Obedience In Religion

Obedience In Religion
Over the years I have heard that Jesus was able to live His life in the manner He did because He was the Son of God. It was said as if the Lord had
some unfair advantage over all humanity in living for the Father. The truth is that He had no such advantages over those born again into the family of
God. Jesus was, in every respect, like us (Hebrews 2:17). In addition, we are commanded to imitate Christ in all aspects of our lives (1 Corinthians
11:1; Matthew 16:24; John 10:4 & 27; 1 Peter 2:21). This is something we could never do if He were somehow granted greater access to holiness and
obedience then His brothers. From the time of Moses and the exodus of Israel from Egypt, it was God's intention that His people would by His sons,
holy and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This does not imply He ever sinned (Hebrews 4:15), but He needed an accurate understanding of humanity's struggle to learn what was required to
learn obedience. This understand occurred by experiencing life through the Holy Spirit's opening of God's word. His struggle would in no way be
ant less than our struggles with the flesh (Hebrews 4:15), and we conquer that battle with the same Spirit opening up for us the same scriptures. I
stress this section not to open a debate about man's ability to be little gods, we can't, but to emphasize Jesus' place as a perfect man. We see Jesus'
quest for scriptural understanding in the Temple at Jerusalem when He was twelve years old. The teacher's amazement came as a result of His
insight. It was not an insight beyond human capacity to know, if it were He would have been deemed a maniac, not a God gifted child. An insight
the teachers recognized as sound and Godly. They knew He was correct because He was using the same reference as they, the Law and the prophets
(Luke 2:46, 47). In every defense of Himself, whether against Satan (Luke 4:1–12) or the Pharisees (John 5:39) or even His disciples (Luke 24:24),
Jesus used the same Bible each of them knew and claimed belief
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Psychology Of Obedience
Obedience is psychology means when a person follows an order from an authority figure. This may mean what they are doing is wrong but they
still do it anyways and this is a form of social influence. This is similar to conformity but differs by it being from a group instead of an authority
figure. You are taking an order from someone, the order is from an authority figure, and this is all based on social power. An example of obedience in
my everyday life is when you are simply going to school. You follow the professor's instructions. If they tell you that you have an exam, you take the
exam. If they tell you to write something down, you do it. We follow these instructions because we are taught from the beginning that these people are
the authority.

Obedience In 1984
The complex mind of the species: homo sapien, is made up of a network of independent and influenceable ideas and feelings. To rein the human into
submission is quite an astounding feat. In the famous novel, "1984" by George Orwell, a struggle between the people, the Outer Party, and the
government, the Inner party, for freedom of thought, expression, and speech is seen. The Inner Party, through a series of strategic tactics accomplishes
the impossible; control over their citizens gaining total obedience. Using invasive technology, threat of annihilation, and the power to manipulate
history, this Inner Party maintains total control over their people and ultimately brainwashes their citizens to have no opinions or resistance to their rule.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This clever play made by the Inner Party distorts time and memory of the citizen. "This day–to–day falsification of the past is carried out by the
Ministry of Truth", with no evidence to back up events occurred, the memory is quickly lost and confused (224). By controlling history, burning the
"wrong" accounts and reshaping history so the Part is always right, there is no trace of the truth left and citizens are lead to believe that all the Party
does is good and right. This tactic allows Big Brother power over time and minds of the

Obedience in the Holocaust
The Holocaust is known as one of the most devastating, or perhaps even the most devastating incident in human history. On paper, the dizzying
statistics are hard to believe. The mass executions, the terrible conditions, the ruthlessness, and the passivity of the majority of witnesses to the
traumatic events all seem like a giant, twisted story blown out of proportion to scare children. But the stories are true, the terror really happened, and
ordinary citizens were convinced into doing savage deeds against innocent people. How, one must ask? How could anyone be so pitiless towards their
neighbors, their friends? In a time of desperation, when a country was on its knees to the rest of the world, one man not only united Germans against a...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I asked Karl Boem–Tettelbach how it was possible in the 1930s that someone could respect Hitler and what he was doing for Germany when Jews were
forced to lose their jobs and leave the country. In his reply spoke, I believe, for millions of other Germans: "That never came up. Everybody
thought the same, that you were in a big team and you didn't separate from the group. You were infected. That explains it a bit." (2) And as for
actual officers, during the Nuremberg Trials, a Commandant named Rudolf Franz Ferdinand Hoess had this to say of his indifference, "Don't you
see, we SS men were not supposed to think about these things; it never even occurred to us. And besides it was something already taken for granted
that the Jews were to blame for everythingВ….It was not just newspapers like Sturmer but it was everything we heard. Even our military and
ideological training took for granted that we had to protect Germany from the JewsВ….We were all so trained to obey orders without even thinking
that the thought of disobeying an order would never have occurred to anybody." (3) So there is a delicate balance between conscious and unconscious
actions of every individual of Nazi Germany. The majority was bewitched by the charismatic Hitler who not only gave them a reason as to why they
were suffering with ubiquitous propaganda, but also promised to strengthen Germany until she was beyond restored. (4) For some it was an underlying
hatred that had finally found a vent. For

Dog Obedience Training Research Paper
Teach Them While Young– Give Puppies Dog Obedience Training Today
By Justin Bryce | Submitted On February 09, 2010
Recommend Article Article Comments Print Article Share this article on Facebook 1 Share this article on Twitter 1 Share this article on Google+
Share this article on Linkedin Share this article on StumbleUpon 2 Share this article on Delicious 1 Share this article on Digg 2 Share this article on
Reddit Share this article on Pinterest
Expert Author Justin Bryce
While there are many dogs up you can take home, most of which can be found in public shelters, it is highly recommended that you choose one that is
still young – a puppy. This way, you won't have a hard time getting yourdog adjust to his new surroundings, and you ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Reward your puppy every time he shows good behavior; on the other hand, it isn't necessary that you punish your dog when he shows poor behavior.
What you want to do is emphasize the privileges and gifts he will receive if he obeys the rules you have laid down. Consistency is key; with practice,
your puppy will grow into a well–trained, well–disciplined dog you can trust and be proud

How To Train Your Dog Essay
Training your dog is the most important part of canine companionship. A happy dog is one who has structure and boundaries. Dogs are pack animals,
and as such, they need guidance in the behavior that you expect from them. If you don't follow through in this leadership role, then the dog will
naturally feel as if it is his place to do so. Adog that understands that you are the leader will naturally be easier to train.
Establish Leadership
You want your dog to understand that you are the person to look to when they question what is right or wrong. This is done by being firm, yet kind
with the dog. You don't want your dog to listen to you out of fear, but out of respect. Setting boundaries is very important in gaining respect. Sit down...
After this second correction, if the dog again repeats the offense, place him in his crate for some downtime.
Stay Active
A dog that is not properly exercised is a dog that will get into trouble! When a dog is bored, he will create his own fun, and that is usually not a good
thing. Take you dog on a walk each day. Grab a Frisbee or a ball and go play in the backyard for a half hour. If you have aworking dog, create a job for
him to do such as pulling the kids around the yard in a cart.
Practice
Your dog is well–exercised and he understands that he needs to refer to you, so now is the time to teach commands. When you begin teaching your
dog obedience commands, it will take practice. First, verbalize the command and attempt to get the dog to obey without any touching. For example, if
you are teaching "sit", you can draw the treat in a straight line form the top of the head. The dog will naturally follow the treat up and in turn his rear
will go down. Repeat the command as he performs it and then give him praise. Repeat this several times with any command you are teaching so that he
gets the hang of it.
But Don't Practice for Too Long
If you drag out training sessions to the point that your dog is getting tired or frustrated, then you

Essay on Obedience
Erin Poulsen ACP W131 Mr. Scanlan 19 October, 2015 Comparative Critique Obedience and Disobedience has been a part of key moments in history.
Many have studied forms of obedience to learn how it affects people and situations. For example, Stanley Milgram conducted a well–known
experiment in which the subject, named the "teacher" must shock the "learner" every time he doesn't remember a word pair from a memory test. The
focus of this study is on the teacher, and whether they will administer killing shocks when told to by an authority figure. Another well–known
experiment is the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip Zimbardo. A group of college boys were separated into two groups, prison guards
and prisoners, and were put... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Dalrymple then discusses the struggle to obey or disobey and that blind disobedience seems like a noble stance but isn't always the correct way to
deal with things. He then goes further in depth by examining the roots of blind disobedience and other key aspects. Fromm states that obedience to
authority is submission in certain situations, and Dalrymple expands on that idea by identifying an example where submission obedience is used.
Fromm and Dalrymple oppose each other in the topic of the roots of disobedience. Fromm believes disobedience has come through history, while
Dalrymple believes that disobedience begins in childhood. Fromm believes that there are various types of obedience, one of them applying to
authority and power. Fromm defines these types of obedience, stating "Obedience to a person, institution or power (heteronomous obedience) is
submission; it implies the abdication of my autonomy and the acceptance of a foreign will or judgement in place of my own" (Fromm 228). Fromm
claims that obedience to any authority, whether it is a person or institution, is called heteronomous obedience. He claims that heteronomous obedience
is submission because a person follows orders and accepts the authority's judgement in place of their own. The obedience is considered submission
and not free will because the obedience suppresses one's self for a higher power. Dalrymple also agrees with Fromm's definition of heteronomous
obedience and

Milgram 's Research On Obedience Essay
Why did Milgram decide to study this topic? What was the motivating factor/event that inspired Milgram to research obedience?
The main reason that Milgram decided to study the topic of obedience was to better understand the extreme inhumane conditions that Jews faced
during the holocaust at the hands of German soldiers. Over the 12 year period between the early 1930's through the mid 1940's millions of Jews died
in death camps run by Germans. Since Milgram himself was of Jewish descent, Milgram wanted to know how and why soldiers obeyed orders to kill
innocent people.
What was hypothesized? You may not find an explicit hypothesis in the article, but do your best to write a summary of what Milgram thought he might
find when conducting the experiment.
In this experiment Milgram hypothesized, how far participants were willing to carry out commands from a peer who had greater power and authority
over them; even if these commands went totally against their values.
How many participants (called subjects in the article) were observed, how were they selected, and how would you describe them?
In the Milgram obedience study 40 males participated in the experience, all of participants were selected based on a newspaper article ad that
Milgram placed. It stated that if they participate in an experiment at Yale University they would be paid a sum of $4.50, which at the time was a large
amount of money. Of the 40 men that were selected their ages ranged from 20 years old

Disobedience Vs Obedience
In society, obedience to authority is ingrained in humanity from an early age, causing some individuals to blindly obey orders without contemplating
the credibility of the source. In psychoanalyst Erich Fromm's article "Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem," he explains that
throughout human history obedience has been associated with virtue and disobedience with sin (Fromm 127). Fromm suggests that our conscience is
an internalized voice of authority (126). Fromm claims individuals need to distinguish the difference between rational and irrational authority because
obedience is effective when individuals want to obey, instead of fearing to disobey (127). Two other authors who examine obedience are Herbert C.
Kelman and V. Lee... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Fromm effectively states that obedience can be established by sheer force or it can be rooted in one's heart (Fromm 127). Fromm considers Downey's
blind obedience to Dawson based on the trust that he has for Dawson in his heart. However, Dalrymple would refute that Downey extinguishes his
existence as an autonomous being by not thinking or acting for himself without approval from Dawson (122). Fromm counters Dalrymple's
conclusions and Dawson's actions by explaining the humanistic conscience that is present in every human being (Fromm 125). Fromm states the
conscience serves our functioning as human beings by having the intuitive knowledge of what is conductive of life and what is destructive of life
(125). Logically agreeing with Fromm, Robert Cialdini, author of "Authority Principle" further explains the need for a sense of control. Cialdini writes
that this sense of control can be gained in two ways: Individuals can either control things themselves or they can trust someone else to provide the
control for them (Cialdini). Fromm and Cialdini would both logically concur that Downey trusts Dawson to provide his sense of control. Cialdini goes
on to explain that another type of authority is being an expert, knowing more about something than others (Cialdini). Downey is younger, smaller, and
weaker, than Dawson, and as

Obedience to Authority
Obedience to Authority No human social organization can function without some degree of obedience to authority, as the alternative would be anarchy
leading to total chaos. Hence we find some sort of a hierarchy in both the most underdeveloped and the most civilized societies where certain
individuals exercise authority over others. Almost everyone will agree that some degree of authority in certain individuals or groups (and their
obedience by other groups) is desirable for the proper functioning of a society. The problem arises when the obedience to authority is taken to extremes.
Unfortunately, history has shown that this happens time and again, usually with undesirable results. It is this blind obedience to authority that... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These shocks were to start at a mild 15 volts and gradually increased to an extremely painful (and lethal) level of 450 volts. During the experiment
the teacher was coaxed to continue giving the shocks to the learner. The results of the experiment were most disturbing: most (60%) of the "teachers"
(who were ordinary people) continued to give the electric shocks right up to the maximum (lethal) level of 450 volts, just with a little bit of coaxing
from the psychologist. Milgram repeated his experiments in several other countries apart from the USA, like Australia, South Africa and several
European countries. The response of the "teachers" in most of these countries was similar. In one of these studies, 85% of the teachers readily
"obeyed" to give the maximum (lethal) punishment to the "erring" learner. ("Baxter"). Although no such experiment can be 100% conclusive, the
Milgram experiments do shed considerable (and disturbing) light on the behavior of ordinary people in obedience of authority. They also explain, to a
large extent, the seemingly perplexing behavior of many ordinary Germans during World War II and some American soldiers in Vietnam. ("Milgram,"
Obedience to Authority..). Another writer who has carried out work of significance on the subject of obedience to authority is Doris Lessing. Although,
not a professional sociologist or historian,

A Study On Obedience And The Obedience
Milgram's Experiment Marlene Reyes University of Phoenix PSYCH/620 May 4, 2015 Dr. Alice D. Akins Introduction Stanley Milgram wanted
to do a study on the obedience to an authority figure, and the obedience is a situationist experiment that evidences what happened the real life
(Badhwar, 2009). Milgram's idea was the Holocaust situation and the Nazis who had the authority over European Jews, during World War II,
when the Nazi killed thousands of people because they had power, as well as how lived Nazis enemies in the death camps. The point of the
research was people behavior in the obedience situation, and Holocaust situation was more compliance behavior of the Jews. Milgram's experiment
had to use three participants' one experimenter, teacher, and learner. Milgram wanted to make observations about if the obedience was a factor of
the life or it was to the Nazis behavior and attitude. Milgram decided to post the experiment information in the newspaper, and he paid four dollars
for one hour in the experiment. The teacher had to give some words to learn if the participant responded wrong he received electroshocks. To be
specific, the researcher used a transmitter with 30 interrupted buttons with 15 volts to 450 volts. In other words, the research has to examine the
capacity of the response of the participant and how is the resistance of an individual. The researcher wanted to analyze the memory of the participant to
recall the words and response time.

Blind Obedience
cars. Without this obedience there would be no order or consistency on the road leading to many problems. Another type of appropriate obedience
would be in war, soldiers must obey their authority figures creating structure. This structure allows armies to work as one in order to accomplish
whatever necessary. If this structure did not exist, soldiers would act freely which would lead to them being killed and other life threatening problems.
However, there are instances when obedience can be inappropriate. Blind obedience is one example of this inappropriate obedience that occurs when
individuals obey without contemplating their actions. Blindly obeying orders from an authority figure can lead to disturbing behaviour, which was
illustrated in... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Weiten and his colleagues describe several problems caused by technology use, however they primarily focus on privacy concerns and the interference
technology has on experiences. Although we stay connected posting pictures on the Internet, by doing this we advertise our personal information
without knowing who may have access to it. If a hacker accesses enough private information they could engage in offences such as identity theft, fraud,
stalking and so on. Nonetheless, technology also interferes with social experiences particularly in schools and at home. As technology becomes
customary children and adolescents are developing attachments to technological devices sometimes choosing them over social interactions. This
relentless use of technology can interfere with the learning experience in schools as students are becoming exceedingly distracted and withdrawn to
their phones. This inappropriate use can deprive children from real life experiences and decline their social skills. Problems with overusing
technology can continue into adulthood, specifically work experiences. The authors of the text explain that technology keeps us so closely connected
that it can deprive us of our alone time. For instance, having a work phone can make it extremely difficulty to get away from a job depriving a person
from down time. With constant emails, text messages and

The Milgram Experiment: The Effects Of Punishment On Learning
–The Milgram experiment was a test created by the Yale University psychologist named Stanley Milgram in 1961. The experiment was to see how
far ordinary people would go to obey an authority figure. The participants of this test were men of different backgrounds, they were told that the
experiment was to find the effects of punishment on learning. Each participant was labeled as either an "teacher" or an "learner". Teachers would give
learner question and if answered incorrectly the teacher was to instruct administers to electric shock the learner. Unknown to the research subjects the
learner wasn't really electric shocked but Milgram hired actors to play the act of it. After the number of established wrong answers from the learner the
actors

Analysis Of The Genocidal Killer In The Mirror
In the article, "The Genocidal Killer in the Mirror," Crispin Sartwell focuses more on power and is concerned with evil. Sartwell states that whether
you believe you are among the evil people or not, you are deeply malicious or a "moral hero" or just profoundly self–deluded. He continues to point out
the timeline of all genocidal events that took place over 500 years, however, he doesn't list all of the genocidal events during the current timeline.
Theodore Dalrymple, the writer of "Just Do What the Pilot Tells You", argues that some people think a determined opposition to authority is
principled and romantic". However, Dalrymple maintains that in his experience as a doctor, people who do not obey authority most of the time have
unsuccessful relationships and a tumultuous life. He also emphasizes this by asking a lady on an airplane if she believed in authority, she states that
she disagrees and that authority is restraining. He then challenges her by asking if it would be all right if he went to the pilot and asked if he could fly
the plane. The lady refuses and states that he does not have the training to fly an aircraft. At this point, Dalrymple predicaments that we gave the pilot
authority to fly the aircraft through his training.
In "The Genocidal Killer in the Mirror," Sartwell states that "no problem is as profound and no evil as prevalent as state power," but that
furthermore, we all have the decisions to be deeply evil and that no one should consider oneself too intelligent, humane, or pure. State power isn't evil
because we need laws and regulations to maintain civilization. Sometimes, authority feels as if they are above the laws because of the status in
society. Sartwell then asks, "Are you a moral hero?" He then points at "Difference in authority." This would be the state, the experts under normal
situations. He also points out, "Do you believe what the authorities tell you just because they are authorities?" Although it is possible to see the
authorities side before the person decides to follow their orders, however, this could lead to chaos. In contrast, "Just Do What the Pilot Tells You"
primarily focuses on the danger contained in blind obedience. Dalrymple looks at Milgram's experiment

What Are The Consequences Of Milgram's Experiment On Human...
In the video , Psychologist Milgram experimented on human behavior and their obedience to authority. Showing examples of regular, everyday
civilians,volunteering to take an experiment on whether they would get questions right or wrong. With this type of experiment comes consequences
where they would be shocked by a "shock generator" which elevates in voltage the more answers that are answered wrong,the higher the voltage goes.
In the experiment Milgram wanted to prove that humans will suffer pain behind their belief of the level of authority that an individual upholds.
Knowing each question that they may answer could possibly become wrong,the consciously continue in the state of conflict of whether they should
proceed on with the experiment or stop. Also, not only does the volunteers continue to take on the abuse of this experiment but their was some
Psychologist that continued with the experiment,even when it became dangerous. One man in the video expressed that he has a heart condition,yet and
stillcontinued to go on with the experiment and the Psycholist agreed,without any hesitations for health of this older male gentleman.... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is just like those that get in airplanes. Considering the plane is going to be in mid air,humans are willing to take a risk of traveling to and from
destinations with their families and believing the pilot would not crash the plane. This type of human behavior goes along with Milgrams
experiment,that humans are willing to take risk, regardless of whether something happens or not. Their obedience to another humans authority( Pilot) is
amazing. Psychologist Milgrams experiment proved that humans will obey to another humans authority of they feel they are superior to

The Levels Of Obedience
During the Holocaust, millions of Jews were murdered. One specific person did not cause these deaths, because there was a division of labor. Adolf
Eichmann, a Nazi organizer of these mass murders, never saw the direct effects of the genocide he was orchestrating. After the Holo–caust, Stanley
Milgram conducted an experiment to study the levels of obedience to authority; he used his experiment to find where evil resided in people and to
discover the cause of the Holo–caust. Some people found his findings useful information, while others thought his experiment was morally
unacceptable due to his use of deception. Diana Baumrind, author of "Some Thoughts on the Ethics of Research: After Reading Milgram's 'Behavioral
Study of Obedi–ence,'" disagrees with Milgram's use of deception and manipulation in his experiment. Con–trasting Baumrind, Richard Herrnstein,
author of "Measuring Evil," believes deception was nec–essary in order for Milgram's experiment to be effective. Deception is ultimately needed in
the experiment, especially because Milgram's findings are beneficial information for social science.
In Stanley Milgram's experiment, "The Perils of Obedience," one person signed up to aid in a study of learning and memory; this person was the
"teacher." This person did not know the other person accompanying him in the study is an actor. This person was a "teacher" in the study, and the actor
was the "learner;" there was another actor, the "experimenter," who was the authority

Stanley Milgram Experiment
In 1963, Stanley Milgram of Yale University conducted a behavioral study on destructive obedience. Researchers hypothesized that obedience to
authority figures is an engrained behavior that can override an individual's ethics, sympathies, and moral conduct. The experiment was designed to
investigate what degree of obedience subjects would display when instructed by an authority figure to inflict pain and harmful punishment (via electric
shock) on another person. In this study, the subjects were told that experimenters were looking into the effect of punishment on learning. Under false
pretense and pretext, subjects were asked by an authority figure (the experimenter) to play the role of "teacher" and were instructed to deliver
increasingly powerful shocks to "learners" when the learners failed to answer the teacher's questions ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The independent variable was the contextual format and procedure of the experiment. That is to say: the perception of the authority figure and their
legitimacy (study conducted at prestigious university with impassively mannered experimenter present in room with subject), the subject's acceptance
of the situation as authentic which was supported by a realistic looking shock machine (that subjects were given a sample shock from) and confederate
learner, and the experimenter's instructions and regimented prodding of teachers to continue. The dependent variable was the amount of obedience and
compliance displayed by subjects. This value was determined by the maximum shock that subjects were willing to inflict on learners before refusing to
continue. Despite initial audibly distressed protests of the learner and descriptions on the shock machine that indicated dangerous levels of severe
shocks would be delivered, 26 of the

Persuasive Essay On Training A Dog
In this day and age, you have a myriad options for training your dog available to you. In fact, the difficulty is more often deciding which approach
will be the most effective in training your particular dog (and the method that will mesh the best with your particular situation). Now that you've
decided that you're going to put the effort into training your dog and that the effort is worth the results you know you'll get, it is time to decide what
kind of training program you will use. Private Training This type of training involves paying an hourly rate for one–on–one with a professional dog
trainer at some sort of training facility (or perhaps in your home for a higher price rate). This can be an extremely effective method of training
your dog. Because you are there with your dog, you are shown exactly what movements and actions to take and your dog benefits from a
professional hand. However, this training is easily the most expensive, because professional trainers often charge 20, 40, or even up to 100 dollars
an hour for their expertise. In addition, if you don't find a trainer who is knowledgeable enough to deal with all of your dog's tendencies or if you
simply don't "click" with your trainer, your time and money can easily slip down the drain with very little observable results. Also, working
extensively with another trainer has the potential to confuse your dog as to who he/she should actually respond to. When this happens, sometimes dogs
who behave very well

Analysis Of Just Do What The Pilot Tells You
Just Do What You Are Told
What if one continued to do what they were told no matter the consequences? The author, Theodore Dalrymple, is a British physician who discusses
why blind obedience is discouraged. His article, " Just Do What the Pilot Tells You", was first published in the New Statesman. In this specific
article, he touches on points in our lives when we are supposed to do what we are told. Disobedience is when a person chooses to disobey some sort
of order they were directed to do. The main point that the author is trying to make is that neither obedience or disobedience should be more prominent
than the other. Although Dalrymple seems to be explaining reasons that people choose to obey or disobey, he is actually using these... Show more
But, on the other hand, one could essentially be follower and does not make their own choices. He is also implying that the findings of Milgram's
experiment may in fact not be true. The author relies on the point that his experiment was heavily supported by the fact that the participants were
being lied to. The author also uses things like examples and past experiences to get his central idea about obey and disobey across. He uses the
example of a social worker from a hospital. In this example, he goes about it by asking the women if she is against all authority. She replies stating
that she is strongly against any type of authority, but she later realized that she was not completely against it because she was allowing the pilot to fly
the plane. During this section of the story, the author once again brings up Milgram's experiment. Dalrymple states that according to Milgram, people
are only doing what they are told. He also examines the fact that during the experiment why people chose to keep going with it even though they did
not agree. According to the writer, this type of obedience would be blind because the person is not thinking for themselves but instead just following
orders. This applies

Obedience to Authority
Obedience to Authority No human social organization can function without some degree of obedience to authority, as the alternative would be anarchy
leading to total chaos. Hence we find some sort of a hierarchy in both the most underdeveloped and the most civilized societies where certain
individuals exercise authority over others. Almost everyone will agree that some degree of authority in certain individuals or groups (and their
obedience by other groups) is desirable for the proper functioning of a society. The problem arises when the obedience to authority is taken to extremes.
Unfortunately, history has shown that this happens time and again, usually with undesirable results. It is this blind obedience to authority that... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this context he observes "among our most shameful memories is–how often we said black was white because other people were saying it."
("Fromm," On Disobedience...) Jo'ana Meyer is a sociologist at the Rutger's University who has carried out valuable research on children's susceptibility
to leading and suggestive interviews in the context of court testimony. She has discussed the effects of stress, prompting and imagination on children's
memories and powers of recall. She stresses the importance of Milgram's research and points out that children are likely to obey authority at an even
higher level than the adults in Milgrim's experiments. Meyer has made important suggestions about ways to interview children that would increase the
accuracy of their testimony. ("Meyer'" Inaccuracies in Children's....). The theme of obedience to authority has even greater significance in the military
environment. The issue has been explored in the recent popular cinema through films such as The General's Daughter and more significantly in the
1999 court–room drama A Few Good Men. The film, starring Tom Cruise and Jack Nicholson, presents both sides of the need for absolute obedience
versus the right of individual conscience in the military. The issue of following orders versus human rights in the military has been intelligently
handled. The film does not treat the issue in a one–sided or black and white manner but gives both sides of the subject. ("A Few

Comparing Milgram's Experiment On Obedience To Authority
Milgram conducted an experiment on obedience to authority. His influence came from the second world war, where Nazi's committed evil crimes
and were part of the mass murder of thousands of Jews. Milgram wanted to know what influences people to do evil things like this, and whether it is
due to 'just following orders' from an authority figure. Slater et al attempted to replicate Milgram's (1963) study of obedience using a virtual
environment. In this essay, I will discuss the similarities and differences between these studies, using evidence to support my points.
Both Slater and Milgram wanted to carry out a study on obedience. To study the obedience of others, they used similar methods, such as conducting
their study in a controlled, laboratory setting which was held in a psychology department. Due to ethical rules now being made ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This is the same in Slater's study, with the teacher also being able to interact with the learner. One of the differences in interaction, in Slater's study, is
that participants were also able to interact through text message, which was shown to cause less tension in the participant when they had to administer
shocks. Even though Milgram's participants were all real people and Slater used an avatar, both studies showed similar results when participants were
able to interact and hear the learner's responses. For example, in Milgram's study, participants showed signs of nervousness, tension and were generally
uncomfortable. When participants were hesitant to stop the task, the experimenter responded saying 'it is absolutely essential that you continue'.
Similar to Slater's study, participants showed signs of stress, frustration and a racing heartbeat. They would also turn to the experimenter for guidance
on what they should do. Both studies resulted in the majority of participants going all the way on the shock

Dog Training The Easy Way
Dog Training the Easy Way (Part I of II)
By Brenden S Sanborn | Submitted On January 23, 2012
Recommend Article Article Comments Print Article Share this article on Facebook Share this article on Twitter Share this article on Google+ Share
this article on Linkedin Share this article on StumbleUpon Share this article on Delicious Share this article on Digg Share this article on Reddit Share
this article on Pinterest
Expert Author Brenden S Sanborn
Dog training is probably the most important topic to every dog owner. Even if it 's not, it probably should be. "Who did this on the rug", "who
destroyed my brand–new leather slipper", and "what happened to the cookies that were cooling on the counter" are also important topics for dog
owners. These topics, however, are less important simply because they are so easily answered.
Every dog is trained to some degree whether you realize it or not. The reason your dog is trained can best be explained by the work of the Russian
scientist Ivan Pavlov. I know what you are thinking. You are thinking, "isn 't he the goalie for the New York Rangers?" Wrong again, gentle reader.
Pavlov was a scientist who worked in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and is probably most famous for his experiment with a dog.
To distill his work to it 's essence, Pavlov fed a dog whilst he rang a bell. He noted that over time if he rang the bell, the dog would salivate, even if no
food were present. It seemed that the cue (the bell) led directly to

House of Obedience
The Bait–al–taa or House of Obedience is a provision in Islam law which gives husbands the right to demand obedience from their wives. If a woman
leaves her husband's home without his permission he has the right to force her to come back. The husband can claim "nushaz" or disobedience and
order her to come back with a qadi (judgement.) Once the woman returns she stays either at her husband's home or in another living area (House of
Obedience) which provides the woman with essential necessities. Divorce is not allowed unless the husband decides that is what he wants. In her short
story "House of Obedience" Ihsan Assal rejects the idea of Bait–al–taa for it only hinders the progression of women in Islam. The short story "House of
Obedience" ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This story also shows us how the House of Obedience essentially served as a blockage to a marriage that might have worked out. If Nabila was not
forced to stay in the House of Obedience and was allowed to stay at her parents's house, she might have come to realize that Adil did infact love
her. Instead she focused all of her time and energy on her hatred towards the House of Obedience, she didn't have time to realize how Adil truly felt,
" I started to cry when I heard the vow of divorce as though a dagger was plunged into my heart....I felt some regret, for I had discovered suddenly that
he really loved me."15 The origin of Bait–al–taa can be attributed to the traditions of Muslim family structures. Women had to stay home, bear and
raise children, and listen to their husbands in exchange for financial support. If she was to ever leave without her husband's consent then the husband
has every right to demand her to comeback home. When she does return it is advised that people and neighbors are near, this way they could hear the
women scream and be witnesses to her treatment. This shows that many women faced the potential of being beaten by their husbands. For the most
part, Bait–al–taa is used by husbands to avoid paying alimony upon divorce, if a woman refuses to go to the House of Obedience, she forfeits her right
to alimony.16 Bait–al–taa is used as another tactic by men to enforce their

Ivan Pavlov: Dog Training
Dog training is probably the most important topic to every dog owner. Even if it's not, it probably should be. "Who did this on the rug", "who
destroyed my brand–new leather slipper", and "what happened to the cookies that were cooling on the counter" are also important topics for dog
owners. These topics, however, are less important simply because they are so easily answered.
Every dog is trained to some degree whether you realize it or not. The reason your dog is trained can best be explained by the work of the Russian
scientist Ivan Pavlov. I know what you are thinking. You are thinking, "isn't he the goalie for the New York Rangers?" Wrong again, gentle reader.
Pavlov was a scientist who worked in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and is probably most famous for his experiment ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He noted that over time if he rang the bell, the dog would salivate, even if no food were present. It seemed that the cue (the bell) led directly to the
desired response (salivation), even when no reward (the food) was present.
When Pavlov tried to publish these findings in a peer–reviewed journal, he was laughed out of the scientific community, as they pointed out that most
dogs salivate almost constantly. Actually, I made that up. My dog salivates almost constantly, so I just thought I would mention it. In reality, Pavlov's
work on what became know as "conditioned response" was rewarded with a Nobel Prize. This may have been the first Nobel Prize that led directly to
an easier method for dog training.
Conditioned response is universal. If you don't believe me, watch a baseball or football game. When the organist starts playing certain tunes, what do
people do? When you hear the jingle of an ice cream truck, what do you do? When you heard your mother use your full name, what did you do? This
is for science, so be honest! In all seriousness, this response makes dog training relatively

House Train Research Paper
How to house train a new puppy by Augusto Deoliveira There are two methods that are my favorites... the first one and most commonly used by
puppy owners is the crate training.. The second method I really like is to have your puppy on a leash while in the house and have that leash attaching
to you while you do your tours around the house... Now let me go into details on how both of these methods work and why.. first lets talk about how
the crate works to help you house train your puppy.. Not only potty train but also avoid unwanted chewing habits to develop. Dogs are clean animals in
their natural habitat the dogs would have an area where they rest,sleep and have raise their babies.. They do not eliminate on these areas.. their instincts
naturally guides them to walk away from that area to use the "bathroom". while young... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
if you are standing outside with them you should ignore them and just make small circles walking around gets them to move which stimulates them
to go to the bathroom.. if you start to talk to them or play with them before they have done their business you may distract them and prevent them
from going to the bathroom outside which means they will have to do it in the house when you go back in.. so ignoring them and just walking in
circles is the best thing to do... Once your puppy has done his/her business you can bring them back in the house and give them a little free time to
explore the home.. no crates or leashes.. but not for more than 30 minutes at a time UNLESS you REALLY are watching them.. remember it is YOUR
job to make sure you don't let your new puppy have accidents..if you fail on supervising them, and letting them out at the right time, then you can't
complain when they leave a mess for you to clean

Milgram Experiment: The Amount Of Compliance And Obedience
In the Milgram Experiment, the researcher is looking for the amount of compliance and obedience that the participants display. This experiment is in
direct contrast to some people's values, but the whole point of this experiment is to see how far the participants are willing to obey orders that have
been given to them. If your values are important to you would you bend your stance in order to comply with an authority figure? As I watched the
Milgram Experiment I found it to be extremely interesting. This is a test to see how far a person is willing to go to obey orders. In this particular
experiment, one participant was assigned the duty to recite words that were said to him by the other participant. The other person's job was to see if the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Now, I do believe parents and children should have a close relationship, but I do not believe they should be best friends. In this situation the parents
try to be "in" with child and allow them to do whatever they want. They do not worry about whether the child has respect, but worries if the child
likes them or not. This teaches your child nothing. You, as a parent, should push your child to do something productive with their life, like go to
school or work. Being your child's best friend does not help them grow as individuals because they know they will always have you in their corner
supporting them, even if it is a bad

The Basics Of Dog Obedience Training
Dog Obedience Training | Puppy Obedience Training– The Basics
Learning first Dog Obedience Training Instruction
Dog Obedience Training simply means the training of any dog. It could range from basic (beginner's) training to a high level (advanced) competition
among different clubs where more accuracy and commands as well as performance are judged and scored. A lot of dog trainers have a lot of fun
during different competition events.
How would you know if the dog is obedient? Just start training with the basic commands and see if it responds each time you give the command. You
can consider dog obedient, instead of just trained in obedience, when it responds reliably each and every time the command is given. Not every dog
that goes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During this course the handler learns proper way to communicate with the dog and train it in a few very simple commands. Most methods are
designed for dog to be trained one command at a time. A good way to start DogObedience Training is leash control (walking as it should be on a
leash). The majority of trainers require dogs to walk on a leash before learning other commands.
Once you learned control your dog on a leash, move on to the next step. When handler is training the dog, there may or may not be a specific word
attached to it. There are certain commands that are accepted as standard and commonly used. However, it doesn't matter if they are used. It is important
though to be consistent in usage.There are five basic commands in Dog Obedience Training:
Basic Dog Obedience Command Sit is Given to the Puppy Sit: the dog simply sits when command is given.
Down: the dog lies down with front feet and rear legs touching the ground.
Heel: the dog's shoulder or head is close and parallel to the handler's leg.
Come (recall command): literally means to "Call your dog". Very important command in dog obedience training. You really have to perfect this

Obedience In The Milgram Experiment
Introduction "Don't eat that, Steve!" yells a worried mother from across the park. Her son, Steve, about to put a chunk of dirt into his mouth looks up
at her, confused. "That's dirt, son, we don't eat that", says his mother in a gentle and reassuring voice. Promptly, the boy obeys her, leaving the dirt on
the ground and running to her arms. Babies like Steve know that, because their mom says so, they should or shouldn't do certain things. This early form
of obedience is present in human beings from a very early age. This is represented in babies obeying simple commands or prohibitions from their
mother (Stayton, Hogan, & Mary D. 1971). This was found to be connected to the mother's responses to the baby's actions, such as her tone and her ...
Most people would not step in the square if they heard Nate firmly tell them to not do so. This is due to the fact that people tend to associate
authority with firmness as it was with Stanley's experiment. Furthermore, it is an innate response to obey people whose tone we recognize to be
linked with negative consequences from when we were babies. The same can be said for why people tended to step on the square more often if
Nate used more gentle tone, as authority is not connected to this sort of tone since early development. It is a social norm to obey people whose
voices reflect authority and to disregard those who do not have this tone. When posed with a situation as bizarre as this one, people will follow their
instincts in order that they may not break the norm. Humans may not be animals like dogs, but they tend to regard authority as something to be
obeyed, even if said authority is not really what it claims to

Dog Training Research Paper
15 Dog Breeds That Are Easiest To Train
Some breed of the dog is not easy to train because of their intelligence, but due to lots of factors. Personality and different environmental factors pose a
challenge in the training of dogs. Some breed of the dog can easily understand the gestural or verbal command and show action on it like when you
pointed out something they easily understand your meaning and move towards that thing. You can easily train yourdog by giving some reward on each
action or by using some other tools like clickers. One of these breeds of the dog can be easily trained by using correct technique and regularity:
1.Labrador Retriever:
This breed is also known as Lab and belongs to the United Kingdom and Canada. This breed of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This breed is very pretty and belongs to small and a tiny group of dog breeds. Yorkshire Terriers are very smart, intelligent, gentle, confident and
courageous.
6.Belgian Sheepdog:
This breed is very loyal, intelligent, gentle and energetic. They are easy to train and mostly used in herding and hunting.
7.Australian Shepherd:
They are also very energetic, loyal and easy to train. They are mostly used in herding in open spaces because they love to run in open spaces.
8.Border Collie:
This breed is highly intelligent and smart. They are also used in hunting and herding. They are very obedient and need exercise to work off their energy.
9.German Shepherd:
This dog is very intelligent and energetic and known for its fearlessness. Mostly this breed is used in police and military due to its fearlessness and
dependability.
10.Bloodhounds:
This breed is very kind, gentle, intelligent and obedient. This breed is well–known for its affection and obedience.
11.Boxer:
This breed is also known as German Boxer and belongs to Germany. This breed is very intelligent, gentle, friendly, playful, confident, cheerful, fearless,
devoted and obedient. Boxers have very cute

Comparative Analysis Of Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of...
Comparative Analysis
The purpose of Stanley Milgram writing his "The Perils of Obedience," is to show to what extent an individual would contradict his/her moral
convictions because of the orders of an authority figure (Milgram 78). He constructed an experiment wherein an experimenter instructs a naГЇve subject
to inflict a series of shocks of increasing voltage on a protesting actor. Contrary to Milgram's expectations, about sixty percent of the subjects
administered the highest voltage shock. (Milgram 80). According to Milgram, experiment variations disproved the theory that the subjects were sadists.
(Milgram 85). Milgram states that although the subjects are against their actions, they desire to please the experimenter, and they often ... Show more
Miles Hewstone, who earned his PhD in social psychology from the University of Oxford, would concur, stating, "This evidence tends to rule out...
the possibility that participants were sadists" (Hewstone 267). Milgram links these ordinary people to the soldiers and Nazi officials who carried out
the Holocaust. Although this argument has partial merit, Milgram's ineffectiveness, is tied to his failure to address the differences between the two
groups. Baumrind effectively addresses this gap in Milgram's logic; she states that the German soldier or SS officer had, unlike the subjects in
Milgram's experiment, no reason to believe that their superiors or authority figures were "benignly disposed towards himself or their victims"
(Baumrind 93). Not only was the relation between the authority and the subject different, but the relation between the subject and the "victim" was as
well. In Milgram's experiment, the learner was an equal to the subject, while in Nazi Germany, the victims were viewed by the soldiers as sub–human.
Baumrind accurately suggests that these altered relationships removed any of the guilt felt by Milgram's subjects from the conscience of the German
soldiers. Thomas Blass, who was an American social psychologist, Holocaust survivor, and author of the first published biography of Milgram, would
add to Baumrind's stance, stating, "Milgram's approach does not provide a

Obedience : Obedience And Obedience
OBEDIENCE
Obedience can be described as an action exhibited by an individual as a result of direct command or order from another person who is normally in
position of authority. Obedience take place when an authority figure ask a person to do something, this usually entails people with status, that is,
someone giving the command has to be above the person the order is being given to.
Everyday Examples of Obedience
Obedience plays a vital role in everyday life; it is an expectation for people to obey authority, obedience is entrenched in most cultures and it is a part
of the society. People exercise their authority through issuing orders or command to people in less authority. For example, in the homes; parents
expect obedience from their children, in schools; students are expected to obey their teachers, same is expected in religions, workplace. In the work
place a boss will command an employee to carry out an order or face being dismissed, the boss is utilizing his/her position to force the employee to act
against his/her wish.
Real life example of obedience was also witnessed during the Second World War, the Nazi Germans ordered people to commit mass murder of the
Holocaust. When Adolf Eichmann was tried in 1961 for the part he played in organizing the Holocaust, by transporting people to the death camps to be
murder, he stated that he was only obeying command given to him. Another example of obedience can be witness in current situation of committing
suicide and

Blind Obedience
Name: Andraie Lewis Eng. 122 May 8,2013 Blind obedience Society often view obedience as a good quality or trait to have; employers want
obedient employees and parents often wish for obedient children. Being obedient means that an individual shows respect for an authority figure and
will carry out the instructions they are given; when someone is obedient they are widely accepted by society, because they do whatever it is that
society asks of them. But obedience carried too far can have disastrous consequences to both the individual and society; this is referred to as blind
obedience. Blind obedience is when a person follows authority without even thinking about the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A lot of people argued that Milgram's experiment was unethical, but made sense logically. His "experiment was carried out in the shadow of the
Holocaust. The trial of Adolf Eichmann had the world wondering how the Nazis were able to persuade so many ordinary Germans to participate in
the murder of innocent people" (Cohen A24). During world war two (WW II), Adolf Hitler, the leader of the Nazis' came to power through his
dictatorship which ultimately led to the demise of millions of Jews in order to create a master race. With the obedience of the militia, he rose to
power annihilating any freedoms Jewish people had. His tactics were brutal and irreconcilably fatal for all who disobeyed him. We can only assume
that the Germans followed Hitler's' gruesome orders out of fear or just out of ignorance but as Tod Hoffman mentioned in his article from the
"Gazette," "How ordinary Germans were transformed into Nazi butchers remains a compelling historical and sociological question" (I12). Those
Germans blindly obeying Hitler's inhumane orders is only apart of the widely astonishing scale of people obeying authority and following orders
without even thinking for themselves. "Even among those who were not rabid National Socialists, faith in, and support for, Hitler "was blind and
boundless." Whether this was genuine or a function of having lived for years under a totalitarian regime that valued obedience above all other

Authority Is A Fundamental Part Of Life Essay
Authority is a fundamental part of life. It is utilized in both micro and macro ways, such as it being used in a particular group of individuals or a mass
society. In order for society to function, some aspect of authority is required. Police officers use authority to maintain order and obedience throughout
communities. Parents possess characteristics of authority in order to teach children right from wrong. As well as, teachers are considered authority
figures since they need to control and maintain obedience in the classroom.
Authority cannot exist without obedience. Society is developed on this notion. Without authority, and its required obedience, disorder and disruption
would occur. But how much obedience to authority is necessary? When is it too much or too little? Authority figures hold such power, that it quite
often becomes abused. We can relate back to these questions by looking into the novel, "Crimes of Power and States of Impunity", and connecting it
with the element of the chain of command. Often, higher authority individuals abuse their powers, just like those involved in the scandal at Abu
Ghraib. The American Soldiers were ambiguously declaring to torture, punish, interrogate, and harm the inmates prior to interrogation. Yet, these
soldiers were following the commands of their higher authorities, that exactly being the United States of America. Obeying the authority can sometimes
be perilous, especially, when one 's morals are disrupted. When you are

Stanley Milgram Experiment: Critical Thinking And Moral...
The Stanley Milgram experiment was a great test on how people react to authority. The experiment tested peoples willingness to follow orders.
Basically the test consisted of the Teacher, the Learner, and the Experimenter. The Teacher was the subject of the test and he administered shocks to the
Learner for incorrect answer. The shocks increased in increments of 15 to a high of 450 volts. More than 50 percent of their test population
administered the highest possible shock. These shocking results make you questions why is there such an absence of critical thinking and moral
responsibility. After watching the original 1962 StanleyMilgram experiment it is interesting to see how people ended up getting to the highest possible
shock. I find that ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The test subjects failed to think critically and even act morally in the face of authority. The teachers often referred to the experimenter to continue
when they knew the learner was in pain. Even after the learner had gone silent the test subjects continued. The test subject didn't know if they were
alive in the room or not and the majority continued regardlessly. One specific dilemma I have was faced with was resolving a grade dispute
amongst a teacher and student. The teacher who was an adjunct filling in for the regular teacher had changed the syllabus contract. Because the
syllabus contract was changed a discrepancy between the two started to grow. The problem grew to such extent that the teacher failed him over
personal issues rather than academic reasons. It took great moral reasoning and review of my peers to come to a conclusion. This experiment to me
really shows just how many people will obey to authority even when it means going against your morals. The Milgram case helped me to criticize my
surroundings more so than rather overlook what is going on. We are taught to obey authority at a young age and all throughout our adolescence. It is
hard to say that some of these pre notions aren't conditioned into our every day

Obedience And Situationism
Situationism, as Doris puts it, allows that "seemingly insubstantial situational factors have substantial effects on what people do" (Doris, p.28).
Whether finding a dime promotes prosocial behavior (Isen & Levin 1972), or an experimenter being in a room with a "teacher" encourages obedience
while a voice over a radio does not (Milgram experiments 1960–63), situation to a significant degree governs action, more so than a person's virtues or
personality (dispositionalism). In no way forgiving the why, situationism allows for understanding how normal people willingly commit heinous and
monstrous acts (as seen with the Holocaust). With that said, this is not to say that personality has no effect on action, rather that it is not dominant as
made out to be. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The argument that, despite strong situational pressures of the Holocaust, there were Germans who engaged in heroic acts of rescue is owed to the
compassion and disposition of the rescuers. This is on say if the situation was that important than these selfless acts of heroism would not occur in the
situation. Surely, it is an alluring look at the people involved in the Milgram experiments and the doctor (Doris, p. 54) who refused to partake in the
evil deed, and view them as acts that speak to a person's character. Additionally, to think that Doris, who agrees with "stepwise acts" counters his own
argument by relying on past experiences rather than what the situation

Essay On Rottweilers
Obedience Training for Rottweilers
Obedience Training: How to train your Rottweiler
Your fearless and loyal Rottweiler may do anything to please you. And with some basic obedience training, this medium breed would become much
easy to care and handle. Your patience will make you a more endearing pet parent and your pet a better behaved canine.
Before starting off do remember that the key to a rewarding training experience is to
There are certain golden rules which, if followed, would give you more fruitful results from the training.
Give time to your dog. Let it get proficient in one trick at a time. Never, that is Never hit the dog as it will not serve your purpose. Rather keep the
training sessions short, fun and training practices consistent. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Practice it till the time dog stretches on the floor on its own.
This command would come handy at times when you need to calm an excited Rottie.
Stay
Your Rottweiler loves to be around you all the time.
The 'Stay' would help you maintain distance when the need be.
Firstly, make the dog sit. Sitting would make staying easier for the dog.
Praise her and tell her to 'Stay' in calm but a firm voice. You may also show your hand wide open, right in front of its face to convey the non–verbal
sign to stop/stay.
Now slowly move away from the dog.
You Fido is more than likely to get up and follow you. Say 'No', take the dog back to its original position and tell it to 'Stay' with your hand across its
face.
Start moving away while repeating the command. And if the dog follows you again, go over the previous steps again.
Please note that, in order to reward the dog for its successful compliance go to the dog and offer it the treat and praise.
Calling them up towards you may confuse the dog. Let them stay where they were asked to stay.
Come
Tie a collar and leash to the dog. Bring the dog to the 'Sit' or 'Stay' position. These postures would help the dog in learning the trick more

Book Review Of The Boxer Dog Tips And Secrets '
"Boxer Dog Tips And Secrets" ReviewThe Boxer Dog Tips and Secrets resource by Bryan Kinnear is a researched book from people who owns
boxer dogs. Essentially, it is a collection of techniques and secrets from various boxer dog lovers, rather than opinions from a single dog expert.
Bryan Kinnear developed this ebook to answer three common questions most loving Boxer dog owners ask. One, how to make your Boxer dog
loving and happy? Two, how to know what your Boxer dog likes or wants, so you can take good care of him/her and make sure he/she is always
healthy? And three, what are the training techniques for your Boxer to obediently follow instructions as well listen to you all the time?Below are a
few of the things I uncovered at Boxer Dog Tips... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
TagsAggressive Dog TrainingBichon Frise Owner's Manual ReviewBichon Frise TrainingBoxer Dog Tips And SecretsBoxer dog trainingClicker
Training: The 4 Secrets of Becoming a SupertrainerClicker training ReviewDog agility trainingdog agility training coursedog behavioral problemsdog
clicker trainingDog crate trainingDoggy Dan'sDoggy Dan's Online Dog Trainer Reviewdog potty trainingdog trainingdog training booksdog training
onlineDog Training Secrets Reviewdog training systemDog Training System reviewdog training tipsdog training treatsdog training videosDove
CresswellGerman Shepherd Handbook reviewGerman Shepherd Traininghousebreaking puppiesHouse Train Any DogHow To Potty Train A Doghow
to train a dogHow to Train My Puppy Fast Track Systemhow to train your puppyKingdom Of PetsKristen Wildobedience training for dogsPerfect
Pooch Train–At–Home System Reviewpotty training puppiesreviewreviewsSecrets To Dog TrainingService Dog TrainingThe Complete Dog Potty
Training In 7 Day

Obedience Essay
Obedience In this essay I am going to write on how obedience can affect individuals on how they would normally behave and integrate in society.
The meaning of Obedience is a form of social influence where an individual acts in response to a direct order from another individual, who is
usually an authority figure. It is assumed that without such an order the person would not have acted in this way. (McLeod, 2007) Migram (1963)
conducted a study on how obedient a person would be to an authority figure and establish a baseline measure of how obedient they would be when
ordered to inflict pain to another human via electric shocks. The way he conducted this was by doing a lab experiment, he advertised for forty
volunteers being paid ВЈ2 to... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The rest going all the way a staggering 65% we believe the pressure of the authoritative figure in the room telling them to continue and telling them
they will not be held responsible for anything bad that happens in the test. Social setting is a powerful determinate of behavior, we are socialized to
recognize authority and react to obedience. There are many positives to Milgrams study such as in has applicability; this experiment has shown us
that we are very obedient to authoritative figures. C.P. Snow (1961) noted that 'when you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find
more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. One such example of
this was when six million innocent people were systematically slaughtered on command by the Nazis during Hitler's regime. One of the criticisms of
Milgram's work is concerned with its ethics was participants were deceived as to the exact nature of the study for which they had volunteered, and by
making them believe they were administering real electric shocks to a real participant. However Milgram could not have found results that truly
reflected the way people behave in real situations if he had not deceived his participants, all of whom were thoroughly debriefed afterwards. A major
criticism of Milgram's study was his unrepresentative sample. Milgram chose to study only American men (thus he was deliberately ethnocentric), but

Obedience Essay
English 1310–04 28 October 2011 Obedience as an act can be traced back to the very beginnings of human history. The common belief has always
been to obey authority at all cost. This act has never been questioned because authority corresponds to the common belief that respecting authority
and obeying them will lead you to success in all aspects of life. Obedience is not defined to specific situations and its context can be portrayed in
various ways. For example, Erich Fromm writes in his essay, "Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem; "Human history began with an act
of disobedience, and it is not unlikely that it will be terminated by an act of disobedience." This statement suggests that everything which we perceived
to be... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Living technically refers to the advances in science that has propelled us to the atomic age. However living emotionally refers to the Old Stone Age
view on ideas about politics, state, society. Fromm makes a very remarkable point when he states, "If a man can only obey and not disobey, he is a
slave; if he can only disobey and not obey, he is a rebel(not a revolutionary); he acts out of anger, disappointment, resentment, yet not in the name of a
conviction or a principle (Fromm 685)". This statement leaves little doubt that we cannot come up with an accurate definition or reason behind
obedience to authority. Essentially there is no gray area between obedience and disobedience. At this point in the essay, Fromm is very close to
convincing the reader that obedience is a psychological and physical problem through the various examples in history he has cited. Fromm continues to
make his case that disobedience is detrimental to society by explaining the two types of conscience that develop within the human psyche when
confronted with a important decision. The first type of conscience is authoritarian conscience which deals with the internal voice that aims to please an
authority figure out of fear. The second type, humanistic conscience, can be explained as the voice in the back of your head that allows you to tell
what is human and inhuman. The complexity of defining which conscience ultimately decides your actions can be explained by

Obedience In Religion

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Tiffany Young

More from Tiffany Young (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Obedience In Religion