The document discusses motion transportation among solar planets. It proposes that planets motions create different time rates, such that 1 hour of Mercury motion = 24 hours of Uranus motion. It aims to prove this by showing Venus and Uranus motions interact such that 1 hour of Venus motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus motion. The document analyzes Venus' rotation period and planetary motion cycles to support its hypothesis.
Abstract
- The solar group is a clock..
- The paper tries to develop our understanding for the solar system motion…
- The classical description which tells - The solar planets are rigid bodies separated from each other in their creation and motion, revolving around the sun by the masses gravity forces – this description fails frequently to explain Planets Motions Data …
- The paper vision tells – The solar planets are one trajectory of energy, or one thread (or one light beam) and each planet is a knot on this thread or a point on this trajectory of energy –
- The solar group – based on the new vision – is one geometrical building and each planet is a part of this same building – and Because of that – Each plant data must be complementary to other planets data –
- (A Complementary Data) is similar to an electron and a positron are produced by the double production experiment – where each particle charge is defined based on the other particle (because of charge reservation law) – similar to that – each planet creation and motion data must be complementary to the other planets to support the general motions harmony –
- That makes the solar group as a machine of gears, and because of the data dependency on one another, that refers to (A Motion Transportation) is found among the planets.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter Cycle of 8 of Jupiter days (=79.2 hours), this Cycle effects on Uranus Orbital Period (30589 solar days)
The hypothesis Explanation:
-Jupiter cycle of 8 days proves that, Uranus orbital period (30589 solar days) can be used as (30589 seconds)!
-That tells us, different rates of time are found in the solar system, and tells also that, several interactions are found between the planets motions which we can't discovered because these interactions are done on different rates of time
-Shortly … Because
-Light motion features are found in the planets motions, Classical Mechanics Science can't help us to discover all interactions found between planets motions, Instead we have to use Relativistic Motions Science to discover these interactions.
Paper Objective:
-The paper discusses the interaction between Jupiter and Uranus Motions which is seen in the dependency of Uranus Orbital Period & Jupiter 8 Days Cycle.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Can Saturn Motion effect on Venus Motion?
The Question Explanation
- The gravitation equation gives no hope for a significant effect from Saturn motion on Venus motion because of the great distance between the 2 planets
- But
- The 2 planets data shows that the 2 planets motions must be effective on one another. The data gives no room for doubt concerning this significant effect.
- The dilemma arises 2 basic arguments…
- The first argument tells that, Saturn motion effects on Venus motion, and that necessitates to search behind the data to find the method by which Saturn motion can effect on Venus motion where this method should be considered as another method of planet motion effect on another planet motion in addition to the gravitation equation.
- The second argument tells, (The Motion Be Transported Among The Planets). This argument is so significant because it gives us a solution to answer (how the motion at distance be done?) – and this argument may help to find a definition for the space.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
(Preprint No. 3) (Planet 8 Days Cycle)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Planets Motions depend On 2 Basic Cycles which are:
(A Cycle Of 8 Days) and (A Cycle of 6 days)
The hypothesis explanation
- The paper hypothesis tells, the solar planet motion can't be considered as an independent motion, because the planets move together based on one general system. This system uses (8 days Cycle) of some planets and (6 days Cycle) of other planets to create a general unified motion.
- Based on that the solar planets motions should be considered as (A Train Carriages Motion). The Planets move together one unified motion in which the planets motions data be complementary with each other
- That proves the claim, the solar group is created based on one geometrical design and that necessitates the planets data to be complementary with one another. by that the solar group should be considered as one machine of Gears and each planet is a gear in it.
- The (8 days) and (6 days) cycles should be used as a proof for this fact.
Paper contents
- The paper explains and discusses the 2 basic Cycles.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (VII)
Abstract
Paper Question
- Can The 1 second period of time be different from a planet to another?
The question discussion
- Someone told that, the second period is a human made unit!, It's not true,
- Earth day period (24 hours) – Earth rotation period (23.9 hours) = 0.1 hour
- This fact forces us to divide the solar day into 24 hours and the 1 hour into 60 minutes – easily by using the same rate we define the second period. That means, the time units are defined based on planets motions and cycles
- The direct question is, why we suppose (Earth second period of time) = (Mercury Second period of time)? On what base this hypothesis is suggested?
- The idea is that, because the time unit is defined depends on planet motion features, and these features are changed from one planet to another, that causes the time unit (period) to be different from one planet to another…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System? Gerges francis
Paper Question
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System?
I claim that – Saturn is the last planet created in the solar system
This claim I provide depend on Saturn data
Because
Saturn Data Is An Old Data
i.e. Saturn Data is found before Saturn Creation
For example
Saturn orbital distance = Mars Orbital Circumference =1433.5 mkm
That tells us may Saturn orbital distance be created depending on Mars orbital circumference or Vice versa – so one planet must be before the other
Also
Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance At The Total Solar Eclipse
Or
Saturn diameter =Venus Circumference x π
The data tells that Saturn is created after Mars, Venus and Earth Moon Creation – this conclusion we can reach based on the suggested Vision – let's remember it:
The solar system is not separated planets from each other – on the contrary – the solar system is one geometrical building and each planet is a part of this same building – because of that the solar system planets data is created depending on each other – based on that the space doesn’t separate the planets but connects them together – where the matter and space (planet matter and distance) is used as geometrical players in this same geometrical building
Shortly
If the planets data is created depending on each other and Saturn data is found as other planets data that may support the claim that "Saturn is created as the last planet in the solar system"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
- The solar group is a clock..
- The paper tries to develop our understanding for the solar system motion…
- The classical description which tells - The solar planets are rigid bodies separated from each other in their creation and motion, revolving around the sun by the masses gravity forces – this description fails frequently to explain Planets Motions Data …
- The paper vision tells – The solar planets are one trajectory of energy, or one thread (or one light beam) and each planet is a knot on this thread or a point on this trajectory of energy –
- The solar group – based on the new vision – is one geometrical building and each planet is a part of this same building – and Because of that – Each plant data must be complementary to other planets data –
- (A Complementary Data) is similar to an electron and a positron are produced by the double production experiment – where each particle charge is defined based on the other particle (because of charge reservation law) – similar to that – each planet creation and motion data must be complementary to the other planets to support the general motions harmony –
- That makes the solar group as a machine of gears, and because of the data dependency on one another, that refers to (A Motion Transportation) is found among the planets.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter Cycle of 8 of Jupiter days (=79.2 hours), this Cycle effects on Uranus Orbital Period (30589 solar days)
The hypothesis Explanation:
-Jupiter cycle of 8 days proves that, Uranus orbital period (30589 solar days) can be used as (30589 seconds)!
-That tells us, different rates of time are found in the solar system, and tells also that, several interactions are found between the planets motions which we can't discovered because these interactions are done on different rates of time
-Shortly … Because
-Light motion features are found in the planets motions, Classical Mechanics Science can't help us to discover all interactions found between planets motions, Instead we have to use Relativistic Motions Science to discover these interactions.
Paper Objective:
-The paper discusses the interaction between Jupiter and Uranus Motions which is seen in the dependency of Uranus Orbital Period & Jupiter 8 Days Cycle.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Can Saturn Motion effect on Venus Motion?
The Question Explanation
- The gravitation equation gives no hope for a significant effect from Saturn motion on Venus motion because of the great distance between the 2 planets
- But
- The 2 planets data shows that the 2 planets motions must be effective on one another. The data gives no room for doubt concerning this significant effect.
- The dilemma arises 2 basic arguments…
- The first argument tells that, Saturn motion effects on Venus motion, and that necessitates to search behind the data to find the method by which Saturn motion can effect on Venus motion where this method should be considered as another method of planet motion effect on another planet motion in addition to the gravitation equation.
- The second argument tells, (The Motion Be Transported Among The Planets). This argument is so significant because it gives us a solution to answer (how the motion at distance be done?) – and this argument may help to find a definition for the space.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
(Preprint No. 3) (Planet 8 Days Cycle)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Planets Motions depend On 2 Basic Cycles which are:
(A Cycle Of 8 Days) and (A Cycle of 6 days)
The hypothesis explanation
- The paper hypothesis tells, the solar planet motion can't be considered as an independent motion, because the planets move together based on one general system. This system uses (8 days Cycle) of some planets and (6 days Cycle) of other planets to create a general unified motion.
- Based on that the solar planets motions should be considered as (A Train Carriages Motion). The Planets move together one unified motion in which the planets motions data be complementary with each other
- That proves the claim, the solar group is created based on one geometrical design and that necessitates the planets data to be complementary with one another. by that the solar group should be considered as one machine of Gears and each planet is a gear in it.
- The (8 days) and (6 days) cycles should be used as a proof for this fact.
Paper contents
- The paper explains and discusses the 2 basic Cycles.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (VII)
Abstract
Paper Question
- Can The 1 second period of time be different from a planet to another?
The question discussion
- Someone told that, the second period is a human made unit!, It's not true,
- Earth day period (24 hours) – Earth rotation period (23.9 hours) = 0.1 hour
- This fact forces us to divide the solar day into 24 hours and the 1 hour into 60 minutes – easily by using the same rate we define the second period. That means, the time units are defined based on planets motions and cycles
- The direct question is, why we suppose (Earth second period of time) = (Mercury Second period of time)? On what base this hypothesis is suggested?
- The idea is that, because the time unit is defined depends on planet motion features, and these features are changed from one planet to another, that causes the time unit (period) to be different from one planet to another…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System? Gerges francis
Paper Question
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System?
I claim that – Saturn is the last planet created in the solar system
This claim I provide depend on Saturn data
Because
Saturn Data Is An Old Data
i.e. Saturn Data is found before Saturn Creation
For example
Saturn orbital distance = Mars Orbital Circumference =1433.5 mkm
That tells us may Saturn orbital distance be created depending on Mars orbital circumference or Vice versa – so one planet must be before the other
Also
Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance At The Total Solar Eclipse
Or
Saturn diameter =Venus Circumference x π
The data tells that Saturn is created after Mars, Venus and Earth Moon Creation – this conclusion we can reach based on the suggested Vision – let's remember it:
The solar system is not separated planets from each other – on the contrary – the solar system is one geometrical building and each planet is a part of this same building – because of that the solar system planets data is created depending on each other – based on that the space doesn’t separate the planets but connects them together – where the matter and space (planet matter and distance) is used as geometrical players in this same geometrical building
Shortly
If the planets data is created depending on each other and Saturn data is found as other planets data that may support the claim that "Saturn is created as the last planet in the solar system"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry Gerges francis
-Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 seconds a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
-But, The Earth moon circumference =10921 km
-We are astonished, and asked, how a planet circumference can be used as a period of time? But the answer was "It's Just Pure Coincidence Of Numbers!"
- There's no doubt that this answer is mistaken
- Even if, we provide more examples – as this one –
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 7510 seconds a distance = 51118 km = Uranus Diameter!
- But, Pluto circumference =7510 km
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Venus motion connects Mercury & Earth Motions
- Venus motion causes to create the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours)
- Venus rotation period is the main platform to use the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
- Venus uses (1 h) of (Mercury Motion) to be equivalent to (24 h) of Earth motion
- Venus motion shows one clear example of (the motion transportation) among the solar planets. (For Venus motion the transportation is done between Mercury and Earth motions)
- The solar group is A Great Clock (= a machine of gears) and the motion is transported among the planets as among gears.
The hypothesis Explanation
Paper objective:
- The paper analyzes Venus rotation period role in the rate of time creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar system motion analysis (questions and answers)Gerges francis
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
- This paper contains 5 questions and their answers concerning the solar system motion analysis
The Questions Are:
- Question no. (1). Why should The solar Planets Data Analysis be considered a basic tool in the solar system motion research? (page no. 2)
- Question no. (2) Can far planets (as Jupiter and Uranus) effect on the Earth moon motion? (page no. 5)
- Question no. (3) Can the classical mechanics explain the solar system motion? (page no. 14)
- Question no. (4) How The Sun Is Created? (page no. 18)
- Question no. (5) Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distance? (page no. 34)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)Gerges francis
Paper objective
The paper provides (1-50) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise direction?
2- Does aether wind exist?
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity? Question Asked December 6, 2019.
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)? Do Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them?
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? And what's the dimension of the space?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Saturn Day Period = 10.7 hours?
Abstract
Paper question
Why Saturn Day Period = 10.7 hours?
The question explanation
- Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during its day period (10.7 hours) a distance = 373644 km = 98.67 % of Saturn Circumference (378675 km).
- The difference between the distance (373644 km) and Saturn Circumference = 5031 km.
- Saturn moves this 5031 km in 518 seconds. Means
- If Saturn day period = 39039 seconds Saturn could move during its day period a distance = its circumference… why does Saturn day period is shorter with 1.3%?
Paper Argument
- The paper claims, Saturn day period be (10.7 h =38520s) and shorter than the required period with 1.3% or 518 seconds because of geometrical necessities
- The paper vision supposes that, the solar group is a machine of gears each planet is a gear in this same machine. Or the solar group is one geometrical design each planet is a part of it.
- Based on this vision, each planet motion data can't be independent from the other planets, on the contrary each planet data is created depends on the other planets data.
- By that, Saturn motion has to use the day (10.7 h) and cause Saturn to move a distance less than its circumference because of the geometrical necessities required for the other planets motions data configuration.
- That's why we analyze Saturn Day Period, because its analysis proves that, the solar planets motions consist together one unified motion which needs each planet data to be created in proportionality with the other planets data to create the general motions harmony.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper tries to prove this fact
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- Mercury Day Period =2 Mercury Orbital period = 3 Mercury Rotation period
- Why?
The Question Explanation
- Frequently we have asked this question, it's noticeable and promised data, which may hides behind the solar system creation and motion secrets
- Now, the answer be available, let's summarize it in following:
- The solar system motion depends on a cycle of (8 days) of some planets
- Also
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses the cycles (8 and 6 days) origin and effect
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)
Abstract
Paper Question
Can Planet diameter be created depending on a period of time? And can it be used as a period of time by the rate (1 km = 1 second)?
Paper question explanation
- One more time we have to ask
- Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
- What's the planet diameter according to Newton Vision?, But
- Jupiter diameter 142984 km can be = 4 Jupiter days periods total
- Saturn diameter 120536 km can be = (π x 10.7 h) (Saturn day period 10.7 h)
- The moon circumference can be = 1/8 of the solar day (if 1 km =1 sec)
- This data be considered as results of pure coincidences of numbers by Newton vision but more data shows that – in fact – Planet diameter be created as a function in some period of time and be used as a period of time – for example
- Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 s a distance = 421056 km = Uranus motion distance during its day period (where 12104 km = Venus diameter) and
- Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 155597 s a distance = 838000 km = 7 Saturn diameters = Saturn motion distance during a solar day
- Newton simply didn't see these motions because he supposed the planet diameter is a piece of rock created by some random process
- Newton theory of the sun gravity is mistaken because the theory components are not defined – the planet diameter is an example
- I want to say
- The solar system is a complex network of motions – Newton theory sees only the planets revolutions around the sun – and by that the basic part of motions be hidden and not defined by the theory
- As a result
- The planets motions features be far from Newton Theory- basically for 3 reasons which are
(1) The Motion Be Transported Among The Solar Planets
(2) The Solar System Distances Be Created Based On A Continuum –and not as individual independent distances
(3) The planets motions effect mutually on one another and these effects can't be attributed to the mass gravity forces
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
- The moon orbital triangle data analysis lead to the following hypothesis (A 2nd Force must effect on the Moon Orbital Motion in addition to Earth Gravity Force)
- Also the 2nd hypothesis is created based on this first one, (Uranus effects on the moon orbital motion, causing to create Metonic Cycle).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (Revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (2nd Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
-Earth (29.8 km/s) moves during (24 hours) a distance = 2574720 km
- The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 2593836 km
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 378675 seconds a distance = 2574990 km
- Mars (24.1km/s) moves during 29.53 hours a distance = 2562023 km
- Why These Distances Are Equal Approximately? (The difference 1%)
Paper Claim
- The paper claims, these distances are equal to enable Pluto to move during its day period a distance = the moon displacements total during its day period, because the equality of these distances has a geometrical necessity for the solar system motion.
- The claim depends on a new description for the solar system which is:
o The solar group is one building and each planet is a part of it
o The solar planets move one unified motion as train carriages
o The solar group is one machine can be considered as (A Great Clock)
o The solar planets data is created depending on one another.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbit Analysis
Earth Moon motion has specific 4 points which are:
1. Perigee Point (R1) : Radius 363000 km from Earth (the nearest point)
2. Total Solar Eclipse (R2) : Radius 377000 km from Earth
3. Average Moon Orbit (R3) : Radius 384000 km (registered)
4. Apogee Point (R4) : Radius 406000 km from Earth (the most far point)
These 4 points are defined by 4 geometrical rules which are:
- (1st Rule) Pythagoras rule : R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1
(why 86000 km? we'll discuss that in this paper)
- (2nd Rule) Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn= (1/Rn+1)
- (3rd Rule) (Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn+1/ Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn) =1.0725
- (4th Rule) The Rate 365.25
This paper tries to prove this fact, and discusses more deep question… why the moon orbital different radiuses are defined by these 4 geometrical rules?
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The SpaceGerges francis
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space?
Yes …
How to prove?
Let's see the moon orbit data in following:
1- Earth moon distance at perigee radius = the outer planets diameters total (1%)
2- Earth moon distance at apogee radius = the solar planets diameters total
3- The moon orbital distance between Perigee and apogee = Earth Circumference = the inner planets diameters total
4- Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse radius = Saturn Circumference
How to explain this data? Can we imagine that Saturn is created after the Earth Moon creation and Saturn used the moon Data
Imagine you have an area and you used partitions to create rooms and offices in this area – now – imagine that – these partitions are so transparent and can't be seen by any person – how to know if the partitions are found or not?
They prevent you to pass– when we don't see the partition it forces us to stop – the moon has to stop at defined points in its motion – the moon can't move beyond neither perigee nor apogee, where both points are defined by other calculations NOT related to the moon motion – even if we don't know yet by what geometrical mechanism the planets diameters total can restrict the moon motion! but because the same points are defined by other calculations that tell us – the restriction points were made by The Space Division and not by the moon motion – that's what I try to prove in this paper – and if I prove that the space is divided, that will prove my claim – "There's A Geometrical Shape For The Space"
Paper Contents
2- The Earth Moon Orbit Analysis
3- Jupiter Effect of the Earth Moon Creation and Motion
4- Mars Migration Theory Revision (The Earth Moon Creation)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The paper suggests that, the solar group is similar to one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in it. or it's similar to one building and each planet is a part of this building.
- The paper vision tells that, the solar planets are created based on One Geometrical Design and because of that the planets data is created complementary with each other.
- Based on this vision, The Motion Must Be Transported Among The Solar Planets.
- The motion transportation doesn't force us to attribute mechanical features for the space, because the motion transportation isn't done mechanically.
- As a result for the motion transportation through the solar system, the Planets motions use different rates of time.
- As example of the different rates of time
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 9.18 hours of Pluto Motion. But
- 1 hour of Earth Motion = 6.387 hours of Pluto Motion
- The solar planets motions different rates of time be unified and created one general rate of time.
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses and proves The Motion Transportation Concept among the solar planets
- And
- The paper discusses and proves the solar planets motions using of different rates of time.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit = 2.55 mkm?
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
- also, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) should force the moon to revolve around Earth through it apogee orbit only (r=406000 km) or even further than it (r=413000 km)!
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
- The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
- The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
- Because
- The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
- Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry Gerges francis
-Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 seconds a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
-But, The Earth moon circumference =10921 km
-We are astonished, and asked, how a planet circumference can be used as a period of time? But the answer was "It's Just Pure Coincidence Of Numbers!"
- There's no doubt that this answer is mistaken
- Even if, we provide more examples – as this one –
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 7510 seconds a distance = 51118 km = Uranus Diameter!
- But, Pluto circumference =7510 km
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Venus motion connects Mercury & Earth Motions
- Venus motion causes to create the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours)
- Venus rotation period is the main platform to use the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
- Venus uses (1 h) of (Mercury Motion) to be equivalent to (24 h) of Earth motion
- Venus motion shows one clear example of (the motion transportation) among the solar planets. (For Venus motion the transportation is done between Mercury and Earth motions)
- The solar group is A Great Clock (= a machine of gears) and the motion is transported among the planets as among gears.
The hypothesis Explanation
Paper objective:
- The paper analyzes Venus rotation period role in the rate of time creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar system motion analysis (questions and answers)Gerges francis
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
- This paper contains 5 questions and their answers concerning the solar system motion analysis
The Questions Are:
- Question no. (1). Why should The solar Planets Data Analysis be considered a basic tool in the solar system motion research? (page no. 2)
- Question no. (2) Can far planets (as Jupiter and Uranus) effect on the Earth moon motion? (page no. 5)
- Question no. (3) Can the classical mechanics explain the solar system motion? (page no. 14)
- Question no. (4) How The Sun Is Created? (page no. 18)
- Question no. (5) Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distance? (page no. 34)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)Gerges francis
Paper objective
The paper provides (1-50) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise direction?
2- Does aether wind exist?
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity? Question Asked December 6, 2019.
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)? Do Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them?
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? And what's the dimension of the space?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Saturn Day Period = 10.7 hours?
Abstract
Paper question
Why Saturn Day Period = 10.7 hours?
The question explanation
- Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during its day period (10.7 hours) a distance = 373644 km = 98.67 % of Saturn Circumference (378675 km).
- The difference between the distance (373644 km) and Saturn Circumference = 5031 km.
- Saturn moves this 5031 km in 518 seconds. Means
- If Saturn day period = 39039 seconds Saturn could move during its day period a distance = its circumference… why does Saturn day period is shorter with 1.3%?
Paper Argument
- The paper claims, Saturn day period be (10.7 h =38520s) and shorter than the required period with 1.3% or 518 seconds because of geometrical necessities
- The paper vision supposes that, the solar group is a machine of gears each planet is a gear in this same machine. Or the solar group is one geometrical design each planet is a part of it.
- Based on this vision, each planet motion data can't be independent from the other planets, on the contrary each planet data is created depends on the other planets data.
- By that, Saturn motion has to use the day (10.7 h) and cause Saturn to move a distance less than its circumference because of the geometrical necessities required for the other planets motions data configuration.
- That's why we analyze Saturn Day Period, because its analysis proves that, the solar planets motions consist together one unified motion which needs each planet data to be created in proportionality with the other planets data to create the general motions harmony.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper tries to prove this fact
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- Mercury Day Period =2 Mercury Orbital period = 3 Mercury Rotation period
- Why?
The Question Explanation
- Frequently we have asked this question, it's noticeable and promised data, which may hides behind the solar system creation and motion secrets
- Now, the answer be available, let's summarize it in following:
- The solar system motion depends on a cycle of (8 days) of some planets
- Also
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses the cycles (8 and 6 days) origin and effect
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)
Abstract
Paper Question
Can Planet diameter be created depending on a period of time? And can it be used as a period of time by the rate (1 km = 1 second)?
Paper question explanation
- One more time we have to ask
- Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
- What's the planet diameter according to Newton Vision?, But
- Jupiter diameter 142984 km can be = 4 Jupiter days periods total
- Saturn diameter 120536 km can be = (π x 10.7 h) (Saturn day period 10.7 h)
- The moon circumference can be = 1/8 of the solar day (if 1 km =1 sec)
- This data be considered as results of pure coincidences of numbers by Newton vision but more data shows that – in fact – Planet diameter be created as a function in some period of time and be used as a period of time – for example
- Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 s a distance = 421056 km = Uranus motion distance during its day period (where 12104 km = Venus diameter) and
- Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 155597 s a distance = 838000 km = 7 Saturn diameters = Saturn motion distance during a solar day
- Newton simply didn't see these motions because he supposed the planet diameter is a piece of rock created by some random process
- Newton theory of the sun gravity is mistaken because the theory components are not defined – the planet diameter is an example
- I want to say
- The solar system is a complex network of motions – Newton theory sees only the planets revolutions around the sun – and by that the basic part of motions be hidden and not defined by the theory
- As a result
- The planets motions features be far from Newton Theory- basically for 3 reasons which are
(1) The Motion Be Transported Among The Solar Planets
(2) The Solar System Distances Be Created Based On A Continuum –and not as individual independent distances
(3) The planets motions effect mutually on one another and these effects can't be attributed to the mass gravity forces
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
- The moon orbital triangle data analysis lead to the following hypothesis (A 2nd Force must effect on the Moon Orbital Motion in addition to Earth Gravity Force)
- Also the 2nd hypothesis is created based on this first one, (Uranus effects on the moon orbital motion, causing to create Metonic Cycle).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (Revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle technique causes the moon orbit to be created in a triangle form, which we analyze in this paper
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Description (2nd Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis No. (1)
There's 2nd force effects on The Earth Moon Orbital Motion
Paper hypothesis No. (2)
Uranus Motion effects on the Earth moon orbital motion and creates Metonic Cycle
Paper Argument
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km
- During 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.59 mkm this distance should be = the moon orbital circumference, and this distance = the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit radius (r=0.406 mkm) (Error 1%)
- That means, if the moon uses this displacement (88000 km) as a real displacement through its orbit, the moon would revolve around Earth only through its apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm), and be always on the most far point from Earth and can't revolve around Earth through any near orbits.
- To solve this dilemma, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle technique
- By this technique, the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement (88000 km) and its orbit horizontal level, So, the real displacement be (L =88000 cos(θ)) by this displacement (L) the moon passes through its orbit although the moon actual displacement = 88000 km daily.
- By Pythagoras technique using the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits as perigee orbit (r=0.363 mkm)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
-Earth (29.8 km/s) moves during (24 hours) a distance = 2574720 km
- The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 2593836 km
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 378675 seconds a distance = 2574990 km
- Mars (24.1km/s) moves during 29.53 hours a distance = 2562023 km
- Why These Distances Are Equal Approximately? (The difference 1%)
Paper Claim
- The paper claims, these distances are equal to enable Pluto to move during its day period a distance = the moon displacements total during its day period, because the equality of these distances has a geometrical necessity for the solar system motion.
- The claim depends on a new description for the solar system which is:
o The solar group is one building and each planet is a part of it
o The solar planets move one unified motion as train carriages
o The solar group is one machine can be considered as (A Great Clock)
o The solar planets data is created depending on one another.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbit Analysis
Earth Moon motion has specific 4 points which are:
1. Perigee Point (R1) : Radius 363000 km from Earth (the nearest point)
2. Total Solar Eclipse (R2) : Radius 377000 km from Earth
3. Average Moon Orbit (R3) : Radius 384000 km (registered)
4. Apogee Point (R4) : Radius 406000 km from Earth (the most far point)
These 4 points are defined by 4 geometrical rules which are:
- (1st Rule) Pythagoras rule : R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1
(why 86000 km? we'll discuss that in this paper)
- (2nd Rule) Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn= (1/Rn+1)
- (3rd Rule) (Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn+1/ Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn) =1.0725
- (4th Rule) The Rate 365.25
This paper tries to prove this fact, and discusses more deep question… why the moon orbital different radiuses are defined by these 4 geometrical rules?
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The SpaceGerges francis
Is There A Geometrical Shape For The Space?
Yes …
How to prove?
Let's see the moon orbit data in following:
1- Earth moon distance at perigee radius = the outer planets diameters total (1%)
2- Earth moon distance at apogee radius = the solar planets diameters total
3- The moon orbital distance between Perigee and apogee = Earth Circumference = the inner planets diameters total
4- Earth moon distance at total solar eclipse radius = Saturn Circumference
How to explain this data? Can we imagine that Saturn is created after the Earth Moon creation and Saturn used the moon Data
Imagine you have an area and you used partitions to create rooms and offices in this area – now – imagine that – these partitions are so transparent and can't be seen by any person – how to know if the partitions are found or not?
They prevent you to pass– when we don't see the partition it forces us to stop – the moon has to stop at defined points in its motion – the moon can't move beyond neither perigee nor apogee, where both points are defined by other calculations NOT related to the moon motion – even if we don't know yet by what geometrical mechanism the planets diameters total can restrict the moon motion! but because the same points are defined by other calculations that tell us – the restriction points were made by The Space Division and not by the moon motion – that's what I try to prove in this paper – and if I prove that the space is divided, that will prove my claim – "There's A Geometrical Shape For The Space"
Paper Contents
2- The Earth Moon Orbit Analysis
3- Jupiter Effect of the Earth Moon Creation and Motion
4- Mars Migration Theory Revision (The Earth Moon Creation)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The paper suggests that, the solar group is similar to one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in it. or it's similar to one building and each planet is a part of this building.
- The paper vision tells that, the solar planets are created based on One Geometrical Design and because of that the planets data is created complementary with each other.
- Based on this vision, The Motion Must Be Transported Among The Solar Planets.
- The motion transportation doesn't force us to attribute mechanical features for the space, because the motion transportation isn't done mechanically.
- As a result for the motion transportation through the solar system, the Planets motions use different rates of time.
- As example of the different rates of time
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 9.18 hours of Pluto Motion. But
- 1 hour of Earth Motion = 6.387 hours of Pluto Motion
- The solar planets motions different rates of time be unified and created one general rate of time.
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses and proves The Motion Transportation Concept among the solar planets
- And
- The paper discusses and proves the solar planets motions using of different rates of time.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit = 2.55 mkm?
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
- also, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) should force the moon to revolve around Earth through it apogee orbit only (r=406000 km) or even further than it (r=413000 km)!
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
- The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
- The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
- Because
- The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
- Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Be A Clock?
Abstract
Paper question
Can The Solar System Be A Clock?
The question explanation
- The 1 second period of time must be different from a solar planet to another, because the 1 second period depends on the planet motion data that necessitates this period of time to be different from a planet to another.
- The solar planets motions harmony must depend on unified units.
- That necessitates to create different rates of time for the planets motions, and also necessitates these different rates of time to be complementary with one another creating one general rate of time.
- Let's use the Earth as example, Earth day =24 hours, but Earth rotation period =23.9 hours, the difference between these 2 periods forces us to divide the one day into 24 hours, and the hour into 60 minutes and into 3600 seconds.
- Means, the 1 second period depends on Earth motion data. Because of that, the 1 second period of time can't be equal period for all planets. But the planets motions general harmony hide this fact by creating one unified rate of time used by the solar system motion. that's why the solar system should be considered as a clock.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the claim and explains the clock work system.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Neptune Motion Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance
- This fact tells, if Uranus and Earth velocities be equal, while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 complete revolutions (19.2 years) - But
- The Earth moon moves a cycle called Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years. this fact creates a puzzle because Earth Cycle is 4 years only (365+365+365+366 =1461 days) and by that the Earth itself doesn't know about Metonic Cycle –
- The question be (How does the moon move Metonic Cycle if Earth doesn't?)
- The answer is …
- Uranus motion effects on the moon motion and caused the moon to move Metonic Cycle (19 years) – Simply, Metonic Cycle is the result of Uranus Motion effect on the moon motion.
- Now, Why The Nobel Prize Decision For Physics 2021 Is Mistaken?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
Why Pluto Day Period = 153.3 hours?
The question explanation
- Pluto day period =153.3 hours
- Where the outer planets days periods are (9.9 h, 10.7 h, 17.2 h and 16.1 h).
- That shows Pluto day period = 3 folds their total together!
- Why Pluto has this long day period and how it's defined?
- Also
- Pluto (9.7 km/s) moves during its day period (153.3 h) a distance =2593836 km = Earth motion distance during the solar day 2574720 km (error 1%)
- The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km = Pluto motion distance during its day period 2593836 km (Zero Error)
- Can these distances equality be a reason behind Pluto day definition? Where
- (Pluto day period / Earth day period) = (Earth velocity/ Pluto velocity)
- Can this data be created based on a geometrical rules, depending on each other?
- Pluto motion distance during a solar day/ the Earth moon displacement daily) = (the Earth moon day period/ Pluto day period).
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- There's a rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 1 solar day) is used in the solar system motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Earth moves during its day period a distance = 2.573 mkm = Pluto motion distance during its day period (error 1%)
- The paper claims, the previous data is found because Earth and Pluto motions are used to create the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
- That means, 1 hour of Earth motion = 24 hours of Pluto motion
- This rate needs Mercury, Venus and the moon cooperation to be created.
- This idea can be supported by the fact that (The moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) =2.573 mkm = Earth motion distance during its day = Pluto motion distance during its day period (153.3 hours)
- The rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a proof for the motion transportation through the solar planets – that means- the motion is transported from a planet to another planet as among gears.
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the creation of the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theoryGerges francis
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
The Solar Group is A Clock (VI) (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 24 hours of Uranus Motion = 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 1.35 hour of Venus Motion = 1.6 hours of Earth Motion= 2 hours of Mars Motion = 48 hours of the moon motion = 4.62 hours of Pluto Motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is A Great Clock
- The Motion is transported from one planet to another
- The motion transportation is done by creation different rates of time among the planets motions
- The planets different rates of time depends on the planets velocities
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to create another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
Paper objective
- The paper aims to prove that, the mentioned planets use the mentioned rates of time in their motions relative to one another
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Can Light Velocity Effect On The Moon Orbital Motion? (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Question
-Can Light Velocity Effect On a Planet Motion?
The Question Explanation
- We observed frequently that, a Planet motion shows light motion features
- Indeed We have observed features as (different rates of time – Lorentz length Contraction phenomenon – distance values are used as periods of time) which are light motion features
- But,
- We couldn't catch the light motion (or any high velocity motion) can cause these features.
- because of that, I have to provide the detailed data in best order and description to be a source of knowledge to whom may concern to help.
- This paper provides a sufficient proof for the claim (Light Motion Features Are Discovered In Planets Motions). Where the paper tries to provide all detailed data and all possible support to whom tries to answer the question (How Can These Features Be Belonged To A Planet Motion?)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (VI)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 24 hours of Uranus Motion = 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 1.35 hour of Venus Motion = 1.6 hours of Earth Motion= 2 hours of Mars Motion = 48 hours of the moon motion = 4.62 hours of Pluto Motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is A Great Clock
- The Motion is transported from one planet to another
- The motion transportation is done by creation different rates of time among the planets motions
- The planets different rates of time depends on the planets velocities
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to create another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
Paper objective
- The paper aims to prove that, the mentioned planets use the mentioned rates of time in their motions relative to one another
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit (II)Gerges francis
We complete our discussion in the previous paper
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit?
we have faced a major question which is:
Does The Moon Motion By The Masses Gravity?
Yes
But the masses gravity can't create the moon orbit – let's to answer in following:
-The Light Moves Firstly Because The Light Motion Creates The Distance And Provides The Energy
-The Planet Moves Secondly Because The Planet Follows The Light Motion Through The Same Distance And Receives The Providing Energy
-The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion
i.e.
-There's A Parallel Universe Which We Don't See – Specifically – The Planet Motion hides A Light Motion Accompanying It
-The Created Matter Resists To Save The Motion Based On Which This Matter Is Created – The Matter Resistance we know as the masses gravity forces
The paper tries to prove this fact
Paper Contents
2- The Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion
3- A Light Motion Is Accompanying With The Planet Motion
4- The Parallel Universe
5- The Masses Gravity Origin
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravityGerges francis
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Abstract
- The Solar Planets motions are relativistic motions
- Earth real Velocity = 0.99 c
- The time is an Energy
- Based on Relativistic Motions, the distances values can be seen as time values
i.e.
- The time is equivalent for the distance
(a development for the Special Theory of Relativity made by me)
- The Solar group geometrical structure depends on the time and Distance equivalence (based on relativistic motions), to create different rates of time, which enables the system to accumulate the Energy
Let's summarize this idea in following:
- Based on the solar group relativistic motions, time and distances values are equivalence
- The solar geometry uses unified distances to create different values of time, which are seen by different cycles
- The time different values depend on each other to create different rates of time
- By this different rates of time the Energy can be accumulated to produce huge energy from average one.
- Based on this description, the solar planets motions produce the sun light beams
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found? (Newton is Wrong) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planet Moves BY Light Motion
Paper hypothesis explanation
- The basic question in the solar system motion is (Do we understand the planets real positions?)
- Newton Theory tells Planet moves by the sun mass gravity force, can that be real? Of course not –Why? because
- The planets motions data show effects of Planets masses gravities on one another - for example – The moon be created by the Earth gravity –that shows an effect of Earth gravity on the moon creation and motion – based on that – Earth gravity effect be seen in the moon creation and motion data – on the other side – No any planet data refers to the sun gravity effect on it?
- Earth gravity is an example of Planets gravities effects on one another where the planets data show clearly that, But no planet data refers to any effect of the sun gravity on it! Why? What options we have to solve this dilemma?
- (a) Can we suppose that the sun mass is an imaginary one and not fact? Or
- (b) Can we suppose that the sun be in some position prevents its gravity effect on the planets motions? to make this question more clear let’s ask –
- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance. Let's ask (Are the Sun, Saturn and Uranus be on one line with an angle 180 degrees or 90 degrees?) Can the planets positions create a distinguish in The Mass Gravity Using?
- But if no sun gravity be found why the planets revolve around the sun? we have discussed this question before(Part No. I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planet Motion Use Different Rates Of Time, Which Disproves (Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity)
- The Planets Motions Using Of Different Rates Of Time Prove (Light Motion Effect on Planet Motion)
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- 3 New Features Of The Solar Planet Motion Be Discovered Later Which Are:
- (1) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Be Integrated In One Unified Motion
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form.
- The solar planets motions data analysis proves that, the previous 3 features are facts and effect on the planets motions.
- The 3 features give us another vision about the solar system motion and disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Also they disprove the planet motion Independency Concept which is inherited from Newton Theory.
Paper Objective
(1) The paper discussion proves that, the 3 features are facts effect on the solar planets motions.
(2) The paper discussion disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity And The Planet Motion Independency Concept.
(3) The paper discussion shows, these 3 features effect on the planets motions as a result of Light Motion Effect On Planets Motions.
Paper Conclusions
- Matter And Space Are Created Out Of Light
- The Solar System Is Created Out Of One Light Beam.
Notice
- No Critic is provided against the mass gravity concept – the critic is against The sun mass gravity as a reason for the solar planets motion – because – the sun is created after the solar planets- and based on that – The solar planets be created and moving before the sun creation. Newton Theory Is Wrong.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Sun Is The Solar System Last Created Piece (Newton Was Wrong) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity Be Refuted Decisively By 2 Facts Which Are:
- (1st Fact) The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion.
- (2nd Fact) The Solar Planets Move A Type Of Motion Different Completely From The Planet Motion Be Described By Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Paper Proves
- The (2nd Fact) is proved by The Solar Planets Motions Analysis.
- While Newton had supposed that, Each planet moves independently from the other planets. The fact is that, the planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion. by that, The Planets Motions Be similar to The Train Carriages Motion. or similar to A Machine Of Gears Motion.
- The Planets Motions Data Analysis disproves the Motion Independency Concept, showing that, the planets motions be different completely from Newton Motion Description.
- The (1st Fact) which is (The Sun is Created after all Planets Creation and Motion). This Fact disproves Newton Theory decisively. This fact proves are discussed in this paper introduction.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometry depends On Light Motion Features
The Hypothesis proves
- The Solar System Data can be explained only by using the light motion geometrical features … let's see some data & Rules in following:
The Equal Distances 50% at least of all distances in the solar system distances are equal each other – we have these distances in the previous paper (Does the Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features?) – We can't explain why these distances are equal each other unless we suggest that these distances are created by a light beam and its reflected one
The Rated Distances by the rate 1.0725 – these distances also we have seen in the previous paper – around 40 % of all the solar planets distances are rated to each by the same one rate (1.0725) and we can't explain why? unless we suggest that – these distances also were equal as the previous point distances but the reflected light beams of these distances are reflected in another frame which created Lorentz length Contraction Phenomenon for all these distances – otherwise why by the same one rate 40% of all distances are rated
The proportionality between the matter and space in the solar system – this also should be a proof that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features - the previous prove we have discussed in the previous paper with many others – is there any new proof?
A NEW PROOF
The Universe Creator is the Motion and NOT the Matter – i.e. – the motion is found before the matter creation- this concept proves that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features. – the paper discuss and tries to prove this concept…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass GravityGerges francis
Light Velocity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- A Light Beam It Velocity=1.16 mkm/s Be A Companion With Mercury Motion.
The hypothesis explanation
- The hypothesis supposes that, the solar planets and their distances be created out of a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s
- The hypothesis is a complex one because we need (at first) to prove that, there's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s.
- How can this hypothesis disprove Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity?
- The hypothesis supposes that, the solar group be created out of one light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/s and the planets creation and motion data registers this light beam velocity because it's their source of energy.
- But
- The sun light velocity =300000 km.
- Means, this light beam (0.3 mkm/s) is created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s). and that proves the claim (The Sun is Created after all solar planets creation and motion) which disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass Gravity.
Paper objective
- The paper proves The light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
This presentation explores a brief idea about the structural and functional attributes of nucleotides, the structure and function of genetic materials along with the impact of UV rays and pH upon them.
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Venus Day Period Analysis
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt –3rd
May 2021
1- Abstract
Paper question
- Can The Motion Be Transported From A Solar Planet To Another?
The Question Explanation
- The planets use (8 days and 6 days) cycles and these cycles refers to a form of the
transportation of motion among the solar planets
- The motion transportation is done based on different rates of time found among the
planets
- Based on that
- 1 hour of Mercury motion be equivalent to 24 hours of Uranus motion
- And because
- (Venus velocity / Mercury velocity) = 0.738
- 1 hour of Venus motion be equivalent to 17.7 hours of Uranus motion
- This claim should be the paper hypothesis, where the paper tries to prove this fact
- By proving the different rates of time (specifically 1 hour of Venus Motion = 17.7
hours of Uranus Motion), that gives a reference of mutual effect of planets motion
on one another which gives support for the motion transposition claim.
- Shortly
- The paper tells that, the motion is transported among the planets by some
geometrical rule unknown for us.
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
Contents
Subject Page no.
1- Abstract 1
Contents 2
2- The Solar Group is a Clock (A General Description) 3
3- Venus Rotation Period Analysis 9
4- Venus And Uranus Motions Interactions 35
5- (1 hour of Venus Motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus Motion)
(More Proves)
54
References 58
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
2- The Solar Group is a Clock (A General Description)
2-1 The main Idea
2-2 The difficulties to accept the description
2-3 The proving method
2-1 The Main Idea
- The solar group works as a machine of gears each planet transports the motion to
another planet
- The motion transportation among the Planets create different rates of time for the
planets motions
- Because of that, the second period of time be different from a planet to another (for
example 1 second of Mercury motion = 24 seconds of Uranus motion)
- The solar planets works as one team and use a motion of 1 second period of time
to cause another motion of (86400 seconds).
- i.e.
- The machine input is a motion done in 1 second and its output is a motion done in
a solar day.
- By that, the solar group works as A Mechanical Clock
- The planets different rates of time depend on their velocities and that means, where
Venus velocity =35 km/s and Mercury velocity =47.4 km/s, because of that, 1 hour
of Mercury motion will be equivalent to 1.354 hours of Venus Motion – that tells –
based on the planets velocities their rates of time is created.
- But
- This rule has an exception, because, the greatest velocity (Mercury) =47.4 km/s
and the smallest velocity (Pluto) = 4.7 km/s and the rate between them = 10.08 and
based on the rule, each 1 hour of Mercury motion be equivalent to 10.08 hours of
Pluto motion, where this rate (10.08) is the max rate can be available based on the
planets velocities
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
- Where this very limited rate (10.08) and the solar group uses a motion of 1 second
to cause a motion of 1 solar day, So, this task can't be limited to the planets
velocities…!
- The dilemma is solved by unification between several planets motions, for
example, the total velocities of (Mercury + Venus + Earth) = 112.2 km/s where
Pluto velocity =4.7 km/s, so the rate between both values (122.2/4.7) = 24 and that
means each 1 hour of the 3 planets velocities total be equivalent to 24 hours of
Pluto motion and by that the rate 1: 24 be created.
- This paper discusses the rate (1: 24) to define how this rate be used in the solar
system motion
- The rate 1 hour be equivalent to 24 hours is used between 3 planets groups which
are:
o 1 Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of Uranus Motion
o 1 Hour Of Mars Motion = 24 Hours Of The Earth Moon Motion
o 1 Hour Of the 3 planets velocities total = 24 Hours Of Pluto Motion
- The previous description provides a new idea about the solar system motion, and
many difficulties are found to accept this description, we need to define these
difficulties and prove that the idea can be fact and proved by the planets motions
data…
- Let's discuss the idea difficulties in the next point…
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
2-2 The Difficulties To Accept The Description
- The motion transportation concept is a new idea and shows great difficulties
because the planets are not gears
- How the motion is transported from a planet to another?
- Let's try to answer in following
o I have discovered planets motion cycle depend on 8 planets days
o And
o I have discovered planets motion cycle depend on 6 planets days
o Of course the planets aren't gears, but the cycles of (8 and 6 days) show that
equal distances are passed by the planets in defined periods of time, for
example the distance Jupiter passes during 8 Jupiter days = The distance
Saturn passes during 10 Saturn days = The distance Neptune passes during
12 Neptune days (this cycles are explained in full details in this paper)
o Because the distances equality is used frequently in the solar planets
motions we have to consider that some transportation of motion is done
among the planets, even if we can't catch the geometrical mechanism by
which this transportation of motion is done but the process is still fact
because of the distances equality using
o If we refuse the motion transportation hypothesis we should answer the
question why these distances are equal
o I want to say that, the distances equality is a proof for the motion
transportation based on some geometrical rule which we don't know yet but
when this rule be discovered the distances equality will be the prove for the
motion transposition process.
o The cycles are explained in point no. (3) of this paper in details, I tried to
summarize the whole idea before the cycle details discussion to explain for
what reason we analyze the cycles
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
2-3 The Proving Method
- If 1 hour of Mercury Motion be equivalent to 24 hours of Uranus Motion, how can
we prove that?
- Let's summarize the proving method in following
o I suggest a hypothesis that (1 hour of Mercury motion =24 hours of Uranus
Motion) (This rate doesn't depend on the direct velocities rate between
Mercury and Uranus, where Mercury velocity = 7 Uranus Velocity)
o The Planet rate of time is created usually based on the planets velocities
o By that 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 1.354 hours of Venus Motion
o But
o 1 hour of Mercury motion =24 hours of Uranus Motion
o Based on that
o 1 hour of Venus motion must be = 17.7 hours of Uranus Motion
o How to prove these rates?
o In Uranus motion data, Uranus Mercury data should show the rate 24 but
Uranus Venus Data should show the rate 17.7
o Shortly
o If we find the rate 24 in Mercury Uranus Motions data and the rate 17.7 in
Venus Uranus Motions data, that provides a proof for the paper hypothesis.
o Let's use one example
o Mercury Uranus Distance = 2815 mkm
o Suppose each 1 mkm = 1 hour
o So, the value 2815 mkm will be = 2815 hours
o But
o Mercury rotation period =1407.6 hours
o means, the period 2815 hours = 1407.6 hours x 2
o but
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
o Mercury moves during its rotation period (1407.6 hours) a distance = 243
mkm (error 1%)
o Venus rotation period =243 solar days
o Means, the distance 243 mkm be used as 1 mkm for 1 solar day
o By that, Mercury rotation period defines 2 different periods for the same
distance (1mkm) which creates the rate 1 hour be equivalent to 24 hours
o This example shows the proving method and test its credibility.
Notice
- Because we don't know the geometrical rule based on which the motion is
transported and don't know how the different rates of time is created by this motion
transportation process, we have to depend on the planets data analysis
- The planets data analysis isn't a weak method of proof, the following example can
support this meaning
o The value 12430 km is the middle rate between Venus diameter 12104 km
and Earth diameter 12756 km
o There's no planet its diameter =12430 km, this value is defined as the middle
rate between the 2 planets diameters but
o Mars (24.1 km/s) moves during 12430 seconds a distance = 300000 km
o Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during 12430 seconds a distance = 120536 km
o Where
o 300000 km = light motion distance for 1 second
o 120536 km = Saturn diameter
o The data shows the value (12430 km) behaves as any planet, for example
o (Jupiter moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Jupiter diameter where
10921 km = the moon circumference) and
o (Uranus moves during 7510 seconds a distance = Uranus diameter where
7510 km = Pluto Circumference).
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
The Solar Planets Data Creation
- The solar planets is similar to a puppets theater, or
- The solar group is similar to one building and each planet is a part of this same
building
- Because of that the planets are parts in the same building or members in the same
creature body
- Also because of that, the planets move together one unified motion as train
carriages.
- Based on that
- The solar planets data are created complementary to each other and because of
that we can conclude the absent data based on the found data analysis…
- The best example to explain (the complementary data meaning) is the double
production experiment, in which from a gamma ray electron and positron are
created, each particle charge is created depending on the other particle change
because of the charge reservation law
- Similar to that, each planet data is created complementarily with the other planets
data, to save the motions general harmony
- This description can help greatly our hypothesis that, the solar group is similar to a
great clock.
- Although this description is so interesting and useful but many difficulties are still
face us because the motion transportation proves is complex to be defined
- One more difficulty we have to face is that, the planet diameter definition, because
the planet diameter is used as a period of time in its motion and we can't catch how
the planet diameter be defined as a function in its motion and velocity (that means
Venus diameter =12104 km because Venus velocity =35 km/s) (This point we
discuss in Venus & Uranus motions interaction).
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
3- Venus Rotation Period Analysis
3-1 Planets Motions (8 days Cycle)
3-2 Earth Velocity Per A Solar Day
3-3 Venus Rotation Period Origin
3-4 Planets Motions (6 days Cycle)
3-5 Saturn orbital Distance 1433.5 mkm
3-6 The Distance 243 mkm
3-1 Planets Motions (8 days Cycle)
(I)
- Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during its day period (9.9 h) a distance = 466884 km
- But
- 466884 km = 449197 km (Jupiter Circumference) + 17687 km
- Where
- (8 x 17687 km = 141496 km (Jupiter Diameter) (error 1%)
- Based on that, we have concluded that, Jupiter has a cycle of 8 days
- Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 8 Jupiter days (79.2 h) a distance = 3735072 km
- (3735072 km= 8 Jupiter circumferences + 141496 km (Jupiter diameter) (1%)
(II)
- The distance 3735072 km passed also by Saturn and Neptune with a rate 80%
depends on one another as following
- Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during 10 Saturn days (107 h) a distance = 3736440 km
- (10 Saturn Circumferences = 3786750 km, the difference =50310 km = Uranus
Diameter error 1.5%)
- Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 12 Neptune days (193.2 h) a distance = 3755808
km
- (24 Neptune Circumferences = 3734323 km, the difference =21485 km = Mars
Circumference (error 0.6 %)
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
(III)
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during Pluto day period (153.3 h) a distance = 3752784
km
- The distance 3752784 km = Jupiter motion distance during 8 days + 17687 km
- And because
- 17687 km x (8) = 141496 km = (Jupiter diameter error 1%)
- That tells another Cycle is found between Uranus and Jupiter based on 8 Pluto
days
- That means, the distance passed by Uranus during 8 Pluto days equal the distance
passed by Jupiter during 64 Jupiter days and equal the distance passed by Saturn
during 80 Saturn days and equal the distance passed by Neptune during 100
Neptune days
Let's see that in following
(1)
Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during (64 Jupiter days) a distance =29880756 km
(2)
Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during (80 Saturn days) a distance =29891520 km
(3)
Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during (100 Neptune days) a distance =31298400 km
(4)
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during (8 Pluto days) a distance =30022272 km
Comments
- The differences between these distances are less than 1 % (generally) and based on
that we can't consider they are different distances but we have to consider that they
are equal distances
- Although still there are small differences which are found for geometrical reasons
for example the difference between Jupiter and Saturn motions distances =
29880756 km – 29891520 km = 10921 = the moon circumference
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
The Discussion:
- Let's discuss the previous data
(A)
- The outer planets are 5 planets, they consist 2 teams,
- The first team is consisted of Jupiter, Saturn and Neptune, these 3 planets move
based on a cycle (8 days cycle) depends on Jupiter motion with the rate 80%,
- That means
- The distance passed by Jupiter in 8 Jupiter days will be equal the distance passed
by Saturn in 10 Saturn days and be equal the distance passed by Neptune during 12
Neptune Days
- The motion depends on the cycle (8 days) because Jupiter is the master motion in
this team and the 2 other planets follow its motion (according to the provided data
analysis)
- Why these 3 planets move equal distances? We still search for an answer … but
- The (small) difference between these 3 distances have geometrical necessities, as
we have seen in the difference between Jupiter and Saturn motions distances which
= 10921 km = The Earth Moon Circumference
- Why the difference = the moon circumference? We still search for answer, but, the
moon circumference itself tells that it's a cycle because if it's not a cycle we would
find a part of the moon circumference
- (as in Earth motion… earth orbital period 365.25 days, but we don't consider this
0.25 day because it has no definition, each 4 years, we consider it as (1 day) and by
that we know Earth has a cycle of 4 years because this (1 day) is defined but the
(0.25 day) isn't defined)
(B)
- The second team is Uranus and Pluto….
- Uranus uses Pluto day period (153.3 hours), and by that, Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves
during Pluto day period (153.3 hours) a distance = 3752784 km
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
- Because
- 3752784 km = Jupiter motion distance during 8 Jupiter days +17687 km
- Because of this data, we have concluded that, these motions depends on (8 days
Cycle), because
- Uranus needs to move during a period (= 8 Pluto days) to cause this value (17687
km) be = (141496 km = Jupiter Diameter 1%)
- Based on that
- Uranus motion distance during 8 Pluto days = Jupiter motion distance during 64
Jupiter days = Saturn motion distance during 80 Saturn days = Neptune motion
distance during 100 Neptune days.
- The cycle depends on (8 days) and connect between Jupiter and Uranus motions as
the 2 heads of the 2 teams and by that the 5 planets motions be in harmony
- Why this cycle (8 days) is required?
- We need to analyze the produced distances to answer this question – so this
process will be done with the next point (3-3 Venus Rotation Period Origin)
- What we know now is that, the planets move equal distances in defined periods of
time following a cycle depends on 8 days (between Jupiter and Uranus) then this
cycle be seen in Saturn as (10 days) and in Neptune as (12 days), it's the same
cycle but it be modified to be suitable for the planet motion and velocity
- The point is that, the planets move based on a geometrical design, and not by a
direct effect of force – that means- the planets move as trains on railways and not
move as cars by their own engine – the planets move on designed geometrical
map.
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
3-2 Earth Velocity Per A Solar Day
I- Data
Group No. (I)
(a)
Earth moves per a solar day (24 h) a distance = 2574720 km
(b)
Pluto moves during its day period (153.3 h) a distance = 2593836 km
(c)
The moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) = 2598693 km
(d)
Uranus moves during 378675 seconds a distance = 2574990 km
Group No. (II)
(e)
Jupiter moves during its day period (9.9 h) = 466884 km
(f)
Neptune moves during the solar day = 466560 km
II- Discussion
- Group no. (I) shows that,
- Earth, Pluto and the Earth moon motion distances during their days periods are
equal (where the difference between them isn't greater than 1%)
- Still the (small) differences have geometrical meaning
- For example
- The moon displacements total (2598693 km) – Pluto distance (2593836 km) =
4857 km (where Mercury Diameter = 4879 km error 0.4%)
- It's almost a general feature that, 2 planets move 2 equal distances in 2 defined
periods of time where these 2 equal distances have (a small) difference which be
another planet diameter or circumference …why?
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
- Earth motion distance per a solar day discussion is found here to create an
extension for our discussion that because the (8 days) cycle provides us some new
behavior of data and I try to show that this behavior is used usually in the solar
system motion
- It's noticeable that, Pluto day period is so long day period in comparison with the
outer planets, and Pluto moves during its day period a distance = Earth motion
distance during its day period – is there any relationship between these 2 facts?
Means, is there any geometrical necessity for which Pluto day period should be so
long to enable Pluto to move a distance = Earth motion distance during its day
period? Why does Pluto need to do that? what's the geometrical benefits behind?
Notice (1)
- (b) (Pluto motion) - (a) (Earth motion) = 19116 km
- Where 19116 km x 2 = 38232 km (= Venus Circumference 38025 km error 0.5%)
- This same difference be between Uranus and Pluto motions,
- That means, Venus diameter is a value mentioned by the 3 planets motions (Earth,
Uranus and Pluto).
Notice (2)
- (c) (the moon displacements) - (a) (Earth motion) = 23973 km
- Where
- The moon displacements total = 2598693 km
- The moon orbital apogee circumference = 2550973 km
- The difference = 47720 km
- But
- 23973 km x 2 = 47946 km
- Data Group no. (II) tells a similar message,
- Some deep relationship is found between Neptune and Jupiter motions,
- the question is that, why Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = Neptune
motion distance during the solar day?!
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
2-3 Venus Rotation Period Origin
I- Data
(1)
Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during (64 Jupiter days) a distance =29880756 km
(2)
Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during (80 Saturn days) a distance =29891520 km
(3)
Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during (100 Neptune days) a distance =31298400 km
(4)
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during (8 Pluto days) a distance =30022272 km
Data Analysis
(2) - (1) = 10921 km = The Earth Moon Circumference
(4) – (1) = 141516 km = Jupiter Diameter (error 1%)
(3) – (4) = 1276128 km = π x 406204 km
(4) – (3) = 130752 km = notice (406000 km = π x 129234 km)
(3) – (1) = 1417644 km
(3) – (2) = 1406880 km
- The difference between 130752 km and 129234 km =1518 km
- During (8 cycles) this value (1518 km) will be = (12104 km Venus diameter)
- In the next data (after discussion) we will use the (8 cycles) to see how to create
the difference 12104 km
- Let's start our discussion
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
II- Discussion
- The rule became clear, that, different planets move equal distances during defined
periods of time
- Although the distances are equal because the difference between them is less than
1% but the (small) differences between them show geometrical effects
- Usually these small differences be = planets diameters or circumferences and
sometimes equal planets motions distances during the solar day or during these
planet days periods
- Why? is the question which we search to answer
- In the previous data
o The difference between Uranus motion (no 4) and Jupiter motion (no.1) =
141516 km = Jupiter diameter (1%)
o Because of this value (141516 km) we conclude a cycle of (8 days) is found
here because during 8 days this distance (141516 km) is accumulated (8 x
17690 km) and be completed after 8 days cycle and by that we concluded
the (8 days cycle)
o The difference between Saturn (29891520 km) and Jupiter (29880756 km) =
10921 km = The Earth Moon Circumference
Notice
- Pluto moves during its day period a distance = 2593836 km
- But
- Uranus moves during Pluto day period a distance = 3752784 km
- The difference = 1.16 mkm (the distance passed by Jupiter during Mars rotation
period).
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
17
In following we use (8 days Cycle)
I- Data
(5)
Jupiter moves during (512 Jupiter days = 64 d x 8) a distance = 239.0446 mkm
(6)
Saturn moves during (640 Saturn days = 80 d x 8) a distance = 239.13216 mkm
(7)
Neptune moves during (800 Neptune d= 100 x 8) a distance = 250.3872 mkm
(8)
Uranus moves during (64 Pluto days = 8 d x 8 ) a distance =240.17818 mkm
(9)
Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves during (1407.6 h) a distance =240.192 mkm
(10)
Mars (24.1 km/s) moves during (2802 h) a distance =243.10152 mkm
(11)
Neptune (5.4km/s) moves during (12430 hours) a distance = 241.6392 mkm
Data Analysis
(6) (Saturn motion) – (5) (Jupiter Motion) = 87550 km
(The moon daily displacement =88000 km)
(8) (Uranus Motion) - (5) (Jupiter Motion) = 1.133566 mkm
(Jupiter motion distance per solar day = 1131840 km )
(8) (Uranus motion) – (6) (Saturn Motion) = 1.04602 mkm
Where
((8 x 406000 km) /π) = 1033870 km
And 1046020 – 1033870 km = 12150 km (Venus diameter = 12104 km)
406000 km = the moon apogee radius = Pluto motion distance during a solar day
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
18
(9) (Mercury Motion) – (5) (Jupiter Motion) = 1148252 km = π x 365500 km
(The outer planets diameters total = 366556 km)
(9) (Mercury Motion)– (6) (Saturn Motion) = 1060700 km
(where 1067148 km x 2 = 2134256 km Mars motion distance during Mars rotation
period)
(10) (Mars Motion) – (5) (Jupiter Motion) = 4.056912 km
(= 4.095 mkm = Mercury velocity per solar day error 1%)
(10) (Mars Motion) - (11) (Neptune Motion) = 1.46232 mkm = π x 466556 km
(Neptune Velocity Per Solar Day =466556 km)
(11) (Neptune Motion)– (5) (Jupiter Motion) =2.594592 mkm
(Pluto motion distance during its day period = 2.593836 mkm)
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
19
II- Discussion
- We used the (8 days Cycle) for the distances we have discussed because the
difference 1518 km will be = 12104 km (Venus Diameter) during (8 days Cycle)
- By performance this objective we have found that,
- The planets move a distance = 243 mkm (Approximately) (error in range 1%)
- And we know that,
- Mercury moves during its rotation period (1407.6 h) a distance = 240.2 mkm
- And
- Mars moves during Venus day period (2802 h) a distance = 243.1 mkm
- For that reason I have added them to our data to see what message is told by this
data…
- What does message the data tell us?
- Notice No. 1
- The distance passed by Saturn during (80 Saturn days) = 29891520 km
- The distance passed by Jupiter during (64 Jupiter days) = 29880756 km
- The difference = 10921 km = the Earth moon circumference
But
- The distance passed by Saturn during (80 Saturn d x 8) = 239132160 km
- The distance passed by Jupiter during (64 Jupiter d x 8) = 239044608 km
- The difference = 87550 km
- Where
- The moon displacement per a solar day = 88000 km
- Simply 88000 = 10921 km x 8
- But
- We should ask, does this cycle different distances mentioned the moon
circumference and motion per a solar day or the values be created by chance?
20. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
20
- Notice No. 2
- The distance passed by Uranus during (8 Pluto days) = 30022272 km
- The distance passed by Jupiter during (64 Jupiter days) = 29880576 km
- The difference =141696 km (= Jupiter diameter error 1%)
But
- The distance passed by Uranus during (8 Pluto days x 8) = 240178176 km
- The distance passed by Jupiter during (64 Jupiter days x 8) = 239044608 km
- The difference = 1133568 km
- Where
- Jupiter motion distance per a solar day =1131800 km
- Simply 1131800 = 141696 km x 8
- The data tells, the planets diameters and their motions distances per solar day are
defined based on geometrical rules
Notice (3)
- Mercury moves during its rotation period (1407.6hours) a distance = 240.192 mkm
- Mercury Jupiter Distance =720.7 mkm
- But
- 720.7 mkm = 3 x 240.192 mkm
- i.e.
- 2 x 720.7 mkm = 6 x 240.192 mkm
- But Mercury Jupiter distance (720.7 mkm) must be used in double value (2 x 720.7
mkm) because it creates 180 degrees through the sun (for a complete revolution)
- That means, the distances (2 x 720.7 mkm and 240. 19 mkm) are defined relative
to each other based on the rate (6) which shows the Cycle (6 periods) (this cycle
will be discussed in this current paper).
21. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
21
- Notice No. 4
- The distance passed by Uranus during (64 Pluto days) = 240178176 km
- The distance passed by Mercury during (1407.6 hours) = 240192864km
- The difference = 14688 km
- Where
- 88000 km (the moon daily displacement) = 6 x 14688 km
- That tells, a cycle of (6 days Period) is used to create the distance (88000 km)
depends on this difference (14688 km)
- Based on that we have to review Then (6 days Cycle) and show if it can help to
perform this process.
22. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
22
3-4 Planets Motions (6 days Cycle)
Preface
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during its day period (17.2 h) a distance = 421056 km
- Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 seconds a distance = 423640 km
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 90560 seconds a distance = 425632 km
- Where
- 12104 km = Venus Diameter
- 90560 days = Pluto orbital Period
- The previous data gives the base on which the (6 time units Cycle) is created – and
based on that, the provided data uses (6 Uranus days 10.3h) and (6 x 12104 s) and
(6 x 90560 s) to pass the mentioned distances and creates the defined differences
- Based on that,
(1)
Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 seconds (x 6) a distance = 2541840 km
Uranus moves during 6 Uranus days period (103.2 h) a distance = 2526336 km
2541840 km – 2526336 km = 15504 km (Mercury Circumference error 1%)
(2)
Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 90560 s x 6 a distance = 2553792 km
Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 seconds (x 6) a distance = 2541840 km
2553792 km – 2541840 km = 11952 km (Venus Diameter 12104 km error 1.2%)
(3)
Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 90560 s x 6 a distance = 2553792 km
Uranus moves during 6 Uranus days period (103.2 h) a distance = 2526336 km
And
2553792 km – 2526336 km = 27456 km (= 86400 km /π)
(4)
Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during (6) of Jupiter days (59.4 h) a distance = 2.8 mkm =
2π2
x 142984 km (Jupiter Diameter)
23. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
23
(5)
Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during (6) of Neptune days (96.6 h) a distance = 1.87 mkm
= Jupiter (13.1 km/s) motion distance during 142984 seconds.
Basic Questions
- The cycle of (6 units) doesn’t depend on planet day period Why?
- Because
o The planet diameter is used as a period of time, and also planet orbital
period is a period of time
o These all data consist together the planet motion required periods of time
but in categories- as we have seen in Saturn analysis – let's remember it
o Saturn day period =10.7 hours but Saturn diameter =120536 km and can be
used as 120536 seconds where 10.7 h x 3600 s x π = 120536 s
o That means, Saturn diameter in fact = Saturn day period but be seen in
another form – Saturn orbital period should be a third form for the same
period of time
o But we have no equation can express these 3 values in each planet..! that's
the difficulty because we don't know the geometrical rule based on which
the planet diameter is created (again we need to ask, how the matter is
created?)
Notice
- Pluto moves during (6 x 90560 s) a distance = 2553792 km
- Pluto moves during its day period (153.3 h) a distance =2593836 km
- The difference = 40080 km = Earth Circumference
- Please remember 40080 km = the 5 inner planets diameters total
24. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
24
The Cycle Discussion
I-Data
(A)
Venus motion distance during its day period = 352.6 mkm
But
2115 mkm = 6 x 352.6 mkm (2136 mkm =680 mkm x π)
(B)
1458 days = 6 x 243 days (Venus Rotation Period)
(C)
18048 mkm (Uranus orbital Circumference) = 6 x 3030 mkm (error 1%)
(D)
30589 days x 6 = 366556 days
And 742 days x 6 = 4452 days
(E)
175.94 days = 6 x 29.32 days
II-Discussion
- Let's analyze the data as possible in following…
o Pluto motion during (6 x 90560 s) pass a distance = 2553792 km
o Pluto moves during its day period (153.3h) a distance = 2593836 km
o Uranus moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 3752784 km
But
o 2593836 km – 2553792 km = 40044 km (Earth Circumference)
o Venus moves during (6 x 12104 s) a distance = 2541840 km
Where
o 2541840 km – 2553792 = 12104 km (Venus Diameter) (error 1.2%)
o That makes Pluto in specific position, so let's analyze it in following:
25. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
25
Pluto Positions In 3 Different Cycles
(1st
Cycle)
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during its day period (153.3 h) a distance =2593836 km
(2nd
Cycle)
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during (6 x 90560 seconds) a distance =2553792 km
(3rd
Cycle)
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 3752784 km
- Let's write a word to remember each cycle in following
o (1st
Cycle) Pluto moves the distance 2593836 km which is equal earth
motion distance during its day period = the moon displacements total
during 29.53 days = Uranus motion distance during (378675 seconds)
o (2nd
Cycle) Pluto moves the distance 2553792 km during the cycle of (6
units) in which Uranus, Venus and Pluto moves equal distances, where
Uranus uses (6 of its days) and Venus uses (6 x 12104 seconds) and Pluto
uses (6 x 90560 seconds)
o (3rd
Cycle) Uranus motion during Pluto day period a distance = Jupiter
motion distance during (8 Jupiter days) = Saturn motion distance during (10
Saturn days) = Neptune motion distance during (12 Neptune days) – by this
cycle Uranus causes Pluto day to be =153.3 hours.
- In this analysis we interest for the following
o 2593836 km – 2553792 km = 40080 km = Earth Circumference
o This is very important because the 2 distances are passed by Pluto motion
during 2 different cycles periods – that makes the 2 cycles as 2 walls to
define the distance 40080 km clearly
o Also, The Earth Circumference = Mercury diameter+ Venus diameter +
Earth diameter + the moon diameter + Mars diameter
26. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
26
A Question
Why does Pluto 2 motion distances difference = Earth Circumference?
- 2593836 km – 2553792 km = 40080 km = Earth Circumference
- In what period of time this difference is found?
- (153.3 hours) – (6 x 90560 seconds) = 8520 seconds
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 8520 s a distance =40044 km= Earth Circumference
- Is this period 8520 seconds so specific?
Saturn Day Period =10.7 hours
- 10.7 hours x 3600 = 38520 seconds
- That means
- 38520 seconds – 8520 seconds = 30000 seconds ( Zero Error)
- Can we use 10 Saturn days? Yes, Why?
- Because
- Uranus motion distance during (Pluto day period 153.3 h) = Jupiter motion
distance during (8 Jupiter days) = Saturn motion distance during (10 Saturn days)
= Neptune motion distance during (12 Neptune days)
- So during 10 Saturn days
- 10 x (10.7 hours) x 3600 = 10 x (38520 seconds - 8520 seconds) = 300000 s
- Why we need this value 300000 seconds? Because
Mercury Day Period =176 solar days – 5040 seconds
- 5040 minutes x 0.99 = 4990 minutes
- 4990 minutes x 60 s = 299400 seconds (approximately = 300000 seconds)
- Why do we need that?
- Because Mercury Day Period is less than 176 solar days by 5040 seconds because
of Saturn motion. (Specifically, because Saturn motion distance during its day
period less with 5040 km than its Circumference).
27. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
27
Notice (1)
- Pluto moves during 8520 seconds a distance = Earth Circumference
- But
- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves during 8520 seconds a distance = 404000 km = Earth
Moon distance at apogee radius (r =406000 km error = 0.5%)
- Please remember that
o The moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km
o This distance should be the moon orbital circumference and where
o 2598693 km = 2π x 413600 km
o That means, the moon apogee radius have to be = 413600 km but
o The moon uses Pythagorean rule and by that could decrease this distance
413600 km to be only 406000 km
o The previous data tells us this decreasing is done depends on the period
8520 seconds by Mercury Motion.
But why Mercury motion is used here?
- Because
- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves during 366556 seconds distance = 17.37 mkm
- And
- (366556 km /Pluto diameter 2390 km) =153.3 (where Pluto Day Period =153.3h)
- (366556 km /The moon diameter 3475 km) =105.5 And (105.5 x 2π =663 km)
- Where the Moon Rotation Period =655.7 hours. (error 1%)
- (366556 km = the outer planets diameters total)
Where
- The moon orbit inclination (5.1 deg) is created depends on (17.2 deg), and as a
result of the moon orbital inclination creation, the moon orbit radius is decreased
from 413600 km to 406000 km – this process is done by Mercury motion during
366556 seconds –
Also 366556 days = 6 x 30589 days (Uranus Orbital Period)
28. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
28
Notice (2)
- Pluto moves during 8520 seconds a distance = Earth Circumference
- Pluto moves during 8520 Minutes a distance = 2.4 mkm = the moon motion
distance during a solar day
- Pluto moves during 8520 hours a distance =144 mkm = Mars displacement from
its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to its current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)
- Pluto moves during 8520 days a distance =3475 mkm = the moon diameter 3475
km x 1 mkm.
Notice (3)
- Light known velocity (0.3 mkm/s) moves during (2 x 8520 seconds) a distance =
5127 mkm (Jupiter Pluto Distance)
- This data is important because it tells there's some reason to use (2) values of this
value (8520 seconds)
- The value (8520 seconds) is the difference (Pluto day period 153.3 hours) and (a
period = 6 x 90560 seconds where 90560 days Pluto orbital period)
- The data tells there's some reason to use the double value (2 Pluto days – 12 x
90560 seconds), let's see why it should be
o During (2 Pluto days 153.3 h x 2) Pluto moves a distance = 5.187672 mkm
o During (12 x 90560 seconds) Pluto moves a distance =5.107584 mkm
o 2 Pluto days 153.3 h x 2) Pluto moves = 5.187672 mkm
o The difference = 80088 km = 4 Earth Circumferences
o Why the period (2 Pluto days) or (12 x 90560 s) is required?
o Because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 deg =5.1 mkm
o That means
o The moon orbital inclination creation needs double value of the distance by
which the moon orbital circumference is created…
Notice (4)
- 12 x 90560 seconds = 224.7 sec x 4846 = 243 sec x 4472
29. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
29
Notice (5)
- Pluto moves during (12 x 90560 s) a distance = 5107584 km
- Venus moves during (12104 s x 12) a distance = 5083680 km
- The difference = 23904 km
- But
- 47720 km = 2 x 23860 km
- (47720 km is the difference between the moon displacement total and the moon
orbital circumference)
- That tells we need a double value?!!
- So
- Pluto moves during (24 x 90560 s) a distance = 10215168 km
- Venus moves during (12104 s x 24) a distance = 10167360 km
- The difference = 47808 km (equal approximately the distance 47720 km)
Notice (6)
- Uranus moves during its day period a distance =421056 km
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = 373644 km
- The difference = 47412 km
- That tells
- This value 47720 km is created as a difference between Uranus and Saturn motion
during their days periods – but this is done as a general concept – the direct effect
is done by the difference of motion between Venus and Pluto motions.
- That means, there's one geometrical context by which this process is done…
Notice (7)
- Uranus moves during (24 of its days periods) (= 412.8 h) a distance = 10.105 mkm
- Pluto moves during (24 x 90560 seconds) a distance = 10.215168 mkm
- The difference = 1% (accurately) = (109824 km) = (6.8 x51118)/π (0.7%)
30. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
30
Let's complete our data discussion in following…
Equation (A)
Venus motion distance during its day period = 352.6 mkm
But 2115 mkm = 6 x 352.6 mkm (2136 mkm =680 mkm x π) (1%)
- 2094 mkm = Jupiter Uranus Distance
- The Equation shows that, the (6) cycles effects on Venus distances
Equation (B)
1458 days = 6 x 243 days (Venus Rotation Period)
- Where
- 1461 days = earth cycle
- There's 3 days different and this value needs more analysis to know why this
difference is found.
Equation (C)
18048 mkm (Uranus orbital Circumference) = 6 x 3030 mkm (error 1%)
- 3030 mkm = Uranus Pluto Distance
- Equation no. (6) tells that Uranus orbital circumference depends on the distance
between Pluto and Uranus based on the Cycle (of 6 units)
Equation (D)
30589 days x 6 = 366556 days And 742 days x 6 = 4452 days
- Where
- 30589 days = Uranus Orbital Period
- 366556 km = the outer planets diameters total
- 742 seconds = (Uranus day period 17.2 h) – (2 x 30589 sec).
- 4495.1 mkm = Neptune Orbital Distance
31. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
31
Equation (4)
Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during (6) of Jupiter days (59.4 h) a distance = 2.8 mkm =
2π2
x 142984 km (Jupiter Diameter)
Equation no (8) shows the cycle (6 units) effect on Jupiter motion
Equation (5)
Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during (6) of Neptune days (96.6 h) a distance = 1.87 mkm
= Jupiter (13.1 km/s) motion distance during 142984 seconds.
Equation no. (9) shows that, Neptune uses the cycle as (6Neptune days) but the
distance depends on Jupiter and not on Uranus - some interaction must be found
behind this data – and the interaction between Uranus and Jupiter (through Pluto day
period) is very useful to understand this relationship.
Equation (E)
175.94 days = 6 x 29.32 days
- Where
- 175.94 days = Mercury day period
- The moon day period =29.53 days and the value 29.32 days is different by around
0.7%).
- (142984 km Jupiter diameter/4879 km Mercury diameter) = 29.32
Notice
- Jupiter moves during 2 Saturn days a distance = 1 mkm (error 1%)
- The moon moves during 2 Saturn days a distance = Mars motion distance during
Mars day period
- Mercury moves during 2 Saturn days a distance =3.65 mkm
32. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
32
The two Cycles Motions Interaction
I- Data
Equation No. (1)
2 x 6 x 243 days = ( 2 x 1461 days) – 6 days
Equation No. (2)
2.908660 mkm x 2π = 18.275 mkm = 3.02 mkm x 6
- Where
- 1461 days = Earth Cycle (365 +365 +365 +366 )
- 2.908660 mkm = Mars motion during (116.7 days) – Mercury motion during
(58.66 days)
II- Discussion
- The 2 cycles discussion follow Venus rotation period as a basic value (243 days
which is equivalent to 243 mkm)
- The previous 2 equations show that, Venus connects between the 2 cycles (8 days
cycle) and (6 days cycle)
- This connection is done for Venus rotation period as a targeted value
Equation No. (1)
2 x 6 x 243 days = ( 2 x 1461 days) – 6 days
- Earth Cycle for (8 years = 2 x 1461 days) depends on Venus rotation period (6
values)
- But the difference between both = 6 solar days
- Venus (35 km/s) moves during 6 solar days (6 x 86400 s) a distance = 18.2 mkm
- This value is defined as the difference between 2 motions which are
o Mars motion distance during Venus day period (116.75 days) =243.1 mkm
o And
o Mercury motion distance during its rotation period (58.66 days) =240 mkm
- The geometrical mechanism behind still need more analysis – but the data shows
that- the two cycles are connected together through Venus rotation period.
33. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
33
3-5 Saturn orbital Distance 1433.5 mkm
Periods Cycle
In the previous motions done by planets to pass distances = 243 mkm approximately
We need to use a cycle of (6 periods) as in following
I- Data
(A)
Jupiter moves during (512 Jupiter days x 6) a distance =1434.267648 mkm
(B)
Saturn moves during (640 Saturn days x 6) a distance = 1434.79296 mkm
(C)
Neptune moves during (12430 hours x 6) a distance = 1449.8352 mkm
(D)
Uranus moves during (64 Pluto days x 6) a distance =1441.069056 mkm
(E)
Mercury moves during (1407.6 h x 6) a distance = 1441.157184 mkm
(F)
Mars moves during (2802 h x 6) a distance = 1458.60912 mkm
(G)
Neptune moves during (778.6 x 16.1 h x 6) a distance = 1462.136055 mkm
II- Data Analysis
(E) – (D) = 88100 km
(F) – (E) = 17.4519 mkm
34. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
34
A Comment
- We should remember that,
- Mercury moves during its rotation period a distance = 243 mkm (error 1%)
- But
- Mercury moves during its day period a distance = 720.7 mkm
- The distance 720.7 mkm between Mercury and Jupiter is the orbital radius and the
diameter needs 2 x 720.7 mkm which need 2 x 4222.6 hours (= 6 x 1407.6 hours
Mercury rotation period)
- And during (6 Mercury rotation periods) Mercury movies a distance = 1433 mkm
- That creates a connection between (243 mkm) and (1433 mkm) that tells both
distances are created depending on each other by the (6 periods) Cycle.
35. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
35
4- Venus And Uranus Motions Interactions
4-1 Preface
4-2 Venus and Uranus Velocities Proportionality
4-3 1 hour of Venus motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus Motion
4-4 Uranus Day Period Analysis
4-5 Pluto Day Period
4-6 Venus and Uranus Motions Interaction
4-1 Preface
- We have supposed, 1 hour of Mercury motion = 24 hours of Uranus Motion
- This hypothesis doesn’t depend on Planet velocity, because Mercury Velocity = 7
x Uranus velocity
- This hypothesis depends on the distance between Mercury and Uranus which
=2815 mkm and if we use each 1 mkm = 1 hour this distance 2815 mkm will be =
2815 hours = 2 x Mercury Rotation Periods (1407.6 hours)
- We use this hypothesis as a fact for now to see what results can be built on it
- Mercury velocity 47.4 km/s = Venus Velocity 35 km/s x 1.354
- Then
- If 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 24 hours of Uranus Motion
- And
- 1 hour of Mercury Motion = 1.354 hours of Venus Motion
- So
- 1 hour of Venus Motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus Motion
- This is an interesting result, because, the number 17.2 connects strongly between
Venus and Uranus Motions Data
- Where 17.2 hours = Uranus Day Period
- Let's discover how this data works
36. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
36
4-2 Venus and Uranus Velocities Proportionality
I- Data
(1)
(35 km/s) (Venus Velocity) / (6.8 km /s) (Uranus Velocity) = 5.1
(2)
(17.2 h x 3600 s) / (12104 s) = 5.1
(3)
17.4 hours = 5.1 x 3.4 hours
(4)
(35 km/s) x 12104s = 423640 km
(BUT, Uranus motion distance during its day period 17.2 h be = 421056 km)
(5)
(5832.5 h /17.2 h) = (17.3 mkm/51118 km)
(6)
17.32 mkm = 12104 km x 1430
(7)
17.2 h x 680 = 2 x 5832.5 hours
(8)
(1461/1433.5) = (1433.5/1407.6)
(9)
(1440/1433.5) = (2815/2802)
37. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
37
II- Discussion
- We analyze the data to prove that, 1 hour of Venus motion is equivalent to 17.2
hours of Uranus Motion
- The discussion isn't a simple one because of Venus Diameter.
- Shortly (How the matter is created?) or (Why Venus Diameter = 12104 km?)
- Can the planet diameter be created as a function in this planet motion velocity?
Means, because Venus velocity =35 km/s, so Venus diameter =12104 km? can that
be possible….
- The data provides us great puzzles and we need to discuss it as deep as possible to
catch the geometrical idea behind…
Equation no. (1)
(35 km/s) (Venus Velocity) / (6.8 km /s) (Uranus Velocity) = 5.1
- Venus velocity = 5.1 Uranus Velocity
- The puzzle data is found with the rate (5.1) because this same rate controls Venus
diameter, that tells, Venus diameter is created as (12104 km) because Venus
velocity =35 km/s
- The next question helps greatly this discussion
Equation no. (2)
(17.2 h x 3600 s) / (12104 s) = 5.1
- Where
- 17.2 hours = Uranus Day Period = 61920 seconds
- Venus diameter = 12104 km
- If each 1 km = 1 second
- So
- 61920 seconds / 12104 seconds = 5.1
- And
- Venus (35 km/s) motion during 12104 seconds a distance = 423640 km
38. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
38
- But
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during its day period (17.2 h) a distance = 421056 km
- The difference between both values = 0.6% = 2584 km
- The equations use Venus diameter as a period of time where 1 km = 1 second (this
using is found widely in the solar plants motions) by that Venus diameter (12104
km) will be = (12104 seconds) where Uranus day period (17.2 h = 61920 s) and
these 2 values have a rate 5.1 between them
- Where Venus velocity =5.1 x Uranus velocity
- Also the period 12104 seconds = 3.4 hours and Venus orbital inclination =3.4 deg
- The data is puzzled but provide a strong approach to define how the matter is
created or how the matter dimensions are defined, (again why Venus diameter
=12104 km)
- The classical description provides no solution for our hard discussion and can't
help us because this description imagine that the planets diameters (and data) is
created by some random process by effect of thousands unknown effects through
the solar group creation history but no idea that the planet diameter and data is
created as a function in its motion (or its velocity). By that no one imagine if
Venus velocity be changed (from 35 km/s to 30 km /s for example) that will
change Venus diameter from 12104 km into 11000 km (for example).
- But the discussion doesn't tell by what effect Venus diameter is created as 12104
km, does it by Uranus motion effect?
- We should keep our eyes on this discussion basic question, if 1hour of Venus
motion = 17.2 hours of Uranus motion, this question is important because it shows
a part of the solar system (as a great clock) and also it shows a transportation of
motion this complex process which we need to define as clear as possible because
the planets are not gears but the motion is transported from a planet to another as
among gears – we still need to see as deep as possible
- To save our discussion objective we need to keep our eyes on the value 17.2
39. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
39
Notice (1)
- The rate 5.1 between Venus & Uranus velocities is a rate used between other 4
planets
- Mars velocity 24.1 km/s = 5.14 x Pluto velocity 4.7 km/s
- The Moon velocity 27.78 km/s = 5.14 x Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s
- Where
- The moon velocity 27.78 km/s = Earth velocity 29.8 / 1.0725
Notice (2)
- 17.2 degrees = Pluto Orbital Inclination
- 17.4 degrees = the inner planets orbital inclinations total
- 23.6 degrees = the outer planets orbital inclinations total
- 23.4 degrees = Earth Axial Tilt
- But
- (23.6 /23.4) = (17.4/17.2)
- Where
- 23.6 degrees +17.2 degrees = 40.8 degrees = 23.4 degrees + 17.4 degrees
Notice (3)
- 30589 days = Uranus orbital period
- But
- 30589 days x 2 = 12104 days x 5.05
- But our rate is (5.1)
- The difference between (5.05 and 5.1) = 1%
- That shows a proportionality between Venus diameter with Uranus orbital period
in addition to Uranus day period! (Why?)
- Because Uranus day period 61920 seconds = 2 x 30589 seconds (error 1.2%)
- Accurately 61920 seconds = 2 x 30589 seconds + 742 seconds
40. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
40
Equation no. (3)
17.4 hours = 5.1 x 3.4 hours
- We know that 17.2 hours = Uranus day Period, And
- We will consider that this value (17.4 hours) express Uranus day period for now…
- Venus diameter =12104 km
- (if we consider each 1 km = 1 second) So,
- 12104 seconds = 3600 s x 3.4 hours
- Where
- 3.4 degrees = Venus orbital inclination
- Equation no. (3) tells that, Uranus Day period is rated with Venus diameter with
the rate 5.1, and this proportionality is mentioned geometrically because of Venus
orbital inclination = 3.4 degrees
- The data causes more puzzles, the basic difficulty is found in our minds, because
we consider the planet diameter is created before and independent from this planet
motion velocity, and based on that, the previous data has no meaning!
- The point is that, the matter dimensions are created based on this matter motion
features and because of that the matter dimensions are created in proportionality
with this matter motion features…
- What we can conclude till now is that, Some strong interaction must be found
between Uranus and Venus Motions
- The next equation may help our discussion
Equation no. (5)
(5832.5 h /17.2 h) = (17.3 mkm/51118 km)
- Where
- 5832.5 hours = Venus Rotation Period
- 17.2 hours = Uranus Day Period = (Uranus Rotation Period)
- 51118 km = Uranus Diameter
41. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
41
- Equation no. (5) tells that, Venus and Uranus (rotation periods) are rated with
Uranus diameter and the value 17.3 mkm
- If the value 17.3 mkm expresses Venus diameter, So, the 2 planets rotation periods
are rated with their diameters
- Equation no (6) shows that the distance 17.3 mkm = 12104 km x 1430 where
12104 km = Venus Diameter,
- But the distance 1430 we don't know and need to wait to the next points to
discover this value (1430)
- So, we consider now that, the 2 planets rotation periods (motions) are in
proportionality with their diameters.
- We can't discuss the rest equations because we need to discover the distance 17.3
mkm which has a great effect on the 2 planets motions interaction.
Equation no. (6)
17.32 mkm = 12104 km x 1430
- Where
- 12104 km = Venus Diameter
- 1430 = this value we need to discuss later
Equation no. (7)
17.2 h x 680 = 2 x 5832.5 hours
- Where
- 17.2 hours = Uranus Day Period
- 5832.5 hours = Venus rotation period
- 680 mkm = Venus Orbital Circumference
Equation no. (8)
(1461/1433.5) = (1433.5/1407.6)
Equation no. (9)
(1440/1433.5) = (2815/2802)
42. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
42
4-3 One hour of Venus motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus Motion
I- Data
(10)
4222.6 hours = 243 x 17.37 hours
(11)
329.8 x 17.4 hours = 2 x 2872.5 hours
(12)
346.6 days x 24 hours = 2 x 241.8 x 17.2
II- Discussion
Notice
- There are 3 values (17.2, 17.4 and 17.7), the rate between Venus and Uranus is 1
hour of Venus motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus Motion
- But the other rates still work because of the geometrical necessities, for that we
need to take care of the difference between them
Equation no. (10)
4222.6 hours = 243 x 17.37 hours
- Where
- 4222.6 hours = Mercury Day Period
- 243 solar days = 5832.5 hours = Venus Rotation Period
- 17.2 hours = Uranus Day Period
- Equation no. (10) tells that, if each day of (243 days) has 17.4 hours, in this case
Venus rotation period will be = Mercury Day Period
- By that, Mercury day period (175.95 solar days =4222.6 hours) will be = Venus
rotation period (243 days each day has 17.4 hours and by that the value 243 days
will have 4222.6 hours)
- But
- Venus rotation period has 5832.5 hours
43. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
43
- That means, each hour of this value (5832.5 hours) should be = 0.72 hours of the
period (243 days x 27.4 hours)
Equation no. (11)
329.8 x 17.4 hours = 2 x 2872.5 hours
- Where
- 2872.5 mkm = Uranus Orbital Distance
- 17.2 hours = Uranus Day Period
- 329.8 = lunar sidereal year (327.6 solar days)
- Notice
- 329.8 days = a lunar sidereal year (327.6 solar days) but it doesn't finish with
the moon sidereal month (27.3 days), instead, it finishes with a synodic month
(29.53 days)
- If 1 mkm = 1 hour
- So, 2872.5 mkm will be = 2872.5 hours
- Equation no. (11) tells that, if each day of (329.8 days) = 17.4 hours, so this
sidereal year (329.8 days) will be equal Uranus orbital diameter after using 1 mkm
for each 1 hour
- This equation also tells about the value 17.4 hours is used geometrically in the
planets motion data
Equation no. (12)
346.6 days x 24 hours = 2 x 241.8 x 17.2
- Where
- 346.6 solar days = the nodal year
- 243 solar days = Venus rotation period (241.8 is very near to 243)
- Equation no. (3) tells that, if each day ( in the nodal year) has only 17.2 hours, in
this case the nodal year will be equal = 2 Venus Rotation period.
- The data supports this meaning (1 hour of Venus Motion = 17.14 hours of Uranus
Motion Distance).
44. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
44
4-4 Uranus Day Period Analysis
I- Data
(13)
4222.6 h x 2 = 17.2 hours x 491
(14)
0.5875 mkm x 29.53 days = 17.4 mkm
(15)
0.5875 mkm x 4879 days = 2 x 1433.5 mkm
(16)
(47.4 km/s) x 366556 s = 17.37 mkm
(17)
2.8 mkm = 160000 km x 17.5 (notice 17.5 x 2 = 35)
II- Discussion
Equation no. (13)
4222.6 h x 2 = 17.2 hours x 491
- Where
- 4222.6 hours = Mercury Day Period
- 17.2 hours = Uranus Day Period
- The rate 491 shows that, a mentioned proportionality is found between Mercury
day period and Uranus day period, because this rate (491) is an integer and
specific number, the geometrical design mentioned this value (491) to be a rate
between the 2 planets days periods – but why?
- But
- 491 = 28.64 x 17.14
- Where 28.64 degrees = (180 degrees /2π) and Neptune axial tilt =28.3 deg (1.2%)
(the equation tells that, Neptune motion must have an effect on the interaction of
Mercury and Uranus motions!)
45. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
45
- Notice
- Our discussion interests to discover the value (17.2) effect on Uranus and Venus
Motions. Many data shows this value effect but we still follow the geometrical
mechanism by which this value creates such great effect on both planets motions
Equation no. (14)
0.5875 mkm x 29.53 days = 17.4 mkm
- The 2 planets interaction depends on the distance 17.4 mkm (or 17.2 mkm), but we
need to know what planet pass this distance (17.4 mkm). Let's try to discover that
in following
o Uranus motion during 29.53 solar days ( the moon day period) a = 17.4
mkm
o Mercury moves during 366557 seconds a distance = 17.4 mkm
o Venus moves during 138 hours a distance = 17.38 mkm
o Pluto moves during 6.7 Pluto days (6.7 x 153.3 h = 1027 h) a distance =
17.37 mkm
Equation no. (15)
0.5875 mkm x 4879 days = 2 x 1433.5 mkm
- Equation no. (15) tells that, Uranus during 4879 days move a distance = 2 x 1433.5
mkm (Saturn Orbital Distance)
- Where
- 4879 km = Mercury diameter
- Equation no. (15) shows an interaction between Mercury and Uranus Motions
depending on Mercury Diameter using as a period of time.
46. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
46
Equation no. (16)
(47.4 km/s) x 366556 s = 17.37 mkm
- Where
- 366556 km = the outer planets diameters total
- 47.4 km/s = Mercury velocity
- Equation no. (16) tells that, mercury moves during 366556 seconds a distance =
17.37 mkm
- Notice
- 366556 km (the outer planets diameters total) /2390 km (Pluto diameter) =153.3
- Where
- 153.3 hours = Pluto day period.
Equation no. (17)
2.8 mkm = 160000 km x 17.5 (notice 17.5 x 2 = 35)
- Where
- 2.8 mkm is the distance passed by Jupiter during 6 Jupiter days (13.1 km/s x 6 x
9.9 hours x 3600 = 2.8 mkm).
- 160000 km = Uranus Circumference.
47. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
47
4-5 Pluto Day Period
I- Data
(18)
4 x 655.7 hours = 153.3 hours x 17.1
(19)
4 x 748 mkm = 2992 mkm (Uranus Pluto Distance 3030 mkm error 1.2%)
Equation no. (18)
4 x 655.7 hours = 153.3 hours x 17.2
- 655.7 hours = The Moon Rotation Period
- 153.3 hours = Pluto Day period
- 17.2 hours = Uranus Day Period
- Equation no. (18) tells that, Pluto day period be so long (153.3 h) because of
Uranus motion effect on Pluto motion, where this effect from Uranus on Pluto
motion is done through the moon rotation period (655.7 hours)
- Notice, Uranus diameter 51118 km = 4 x 12756 km Earth diameter
48. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
48
4-6 Venus and Uranus Motions Interaction
I- Data
(20)
2 x 30589 days = 17.7 x 3475 days
(21)
5832.5 hours = 17.7 hours x 329.8
(22)
3475 mkm = 5.1 x 680 mkm (Venus Orbital Circumference)
(23)
(3475/180.8) = (2872.5 /149.6)
II- Discussion
- Let's remember the hypothesis of this point…. It tells that,
- 1 hour of Venus Motion =17.7 hours of Uranus motion,
- If this hypothesis is a fact, can this proportionality be found between Venus and
Uranus Motions Data? Let's discuss the equations in following
Equation no. (20)
2 x 30589 days = 17.7 x 3475 days
- Where
- 30589 solar days = Uranus Orbital Period
- 3475 km = The Earth Moon Diameter (here is used as a period of time)
- 17.7 = The rate between Venus and Uranus hours
- Equation no (20) should be used as a proof for the hypothesis that (1 hour of
Venus Motion be equivalent to 17.7 hours of Uranus motion)
- Why this equation can be used as a proof?
- We remember that
- 2 x 30589 seconds = 12104 seconds x 5.05 (error 1% with the rate 5.1)
- Also
49. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
49
- Uranus day period (17.2 hours = 61920 seconds) = 2 x 30589 s + 742 s
- Equation no. (20) shows that the rate (1 : 17.7) is found between Venus and
Uranus through the moon diameter (3475 km)
- That means, Uranus motion effect on Venus motion through the moon diameter (or
the moon motion) and that may tell an answer for the question why does the moon
orbit regress? Where Uranus axial tilt regresses and Venus axial tilt regresses and
if Venus motion be effected by Uranus motion through the moon motion, that tells
this effect of Uranus motion on Venus motion through the moon motion causes the
moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year).
- Equation no. (20) shows that, if each day of the days (3475) has 17.7 hours, so the
hours number of this period (3475 days) will be = 2 x 30589 hours
- So the moon diameter (3475 km) will be used as a period of time (days) where
each day be = 17.7 hours.
Equation no. (21)
5832.5 hours = 17.7 hours x 329.8 days
- Where
- 5832.5 hours = Venus rotation period
- 329.8 days = a lunar sidereal year (327.6 solar days) but it doesn't finish with
the moon sidereal month (27.3 days), instead, it finishes with a synodic month
(29.53 days)
- Equation (21) shows that, if each day of the year (329.8 days) has 17.7 hours, so
this period of time (329.8 days) will have a number of hours = Venus rotation
period.
- Why this data can be a proof for the hypothesis?
- Because different cycles and periods are defined in proportionality with the rate
17.7 hours, where this rate is different from Uranus day period (17.2 hours), that
means, the geometrical design aims to create these data in proportionality with the
rate 17.7 which we have concluded based on the hypothesis.
50. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
50
- I want to say that, the geometrical design define the data taken into consideration
the rate 17.7, and we have no other reason for this rate except the proportionality
between Uranus and Venus motions (1 hour of Venus motion = 17.7 hours of
Uranus Motion)
- The data shows that clearly
Equation no. (22)
3475 mkm = 5.1 x 680 mkm (Venus Orbital Circumference)
- Where
- 3475 km = The Moon Diameter
- 3475 mkm = 3475 km x 1 mkm
- 5.1 = The rate between Venus & Uranus velocities
- Also 5.1 deg = The Moon Orbital Inclination
- Equation no. (22) shows that, the proportionality between the moon diameter and
Venus motion data is so wide and this equation is one more form of this
proportionality
- The geometrical mechanism still needs more analysis but the data shows that the
interaction between the moon data (specially the moon diameter) with Venus
Motion data is so strong interaction
Equation no. (23)
(3475/180.8) = (2872.5 /149.6)
- Where
- 3475 km = The Moon Diameter
- 180.8 degrees = 177.4 degrees +3.4 degrees
- 2872.5 mkm = Uranus Orbital Distance
- 149.6 mkm = Earth Orbital Distance
- Equation no. (23) tries to show Uranus motion effect on Venus motion data, where
the value 180.8 degrees shows Uranus Motion data effect.
51. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
51
- 180.8 deg = 177.4 deg (Venus Axial Tilt) + 3.4 deg (Venus orbital; inclination)
- But
- 180.8 degrees = 180 degrees +0.8 deg (Uranus Orbital Inclination)
- That shows Uranus motion effect on Venus Motion Data.
- Equation no. (23) shows that Uranus motion effect on Venus Motion data is done
through the moon diameter and this effect is seen through the rate between Uranus
and Earth orbital distances.
52. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
52
4-7 The General Conclusions
- The paper hypothesis tells that, 1 hour of Venus Motion b equivalent to 17.7 hours
of Uranus Motion
- This rate of time isn't defined based on Planets velocities Rate, because Mercury
velocity = 7 Uranus velocity but 1 hour or Mercury motion should be = 24 hours
of Uranus Motion
- This rate of time is defined based on the distance between Mercury and Uranus,
where Mercury Uranus distance = 2815 mkm and if we use 1mkm = 1 hour that
will make the distance 2815 mkm be equivalent to 2815 hours = 2 x Mercury
rotation period (1407.6 hours).
- Also
- Mercury moves during its rotation period (1407.6 hours) a distance =243 mkm
(error 1%)
- If we use 1 mkm = 1 solar day, so this distance 243 mkm will be = 243 solar days
(= Venus rotation period)
- We have 2 rates of time (one uses 1mkm = 1 hour and the other uses 1 mkm = 1
solar day), based on this data I have supposed that 1 hour of Mercury motion be
equivalent to 24 hours of Uranus motion
- But
- Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) = Venus velocity (35 km/s) x 1.354
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 24 hours of Uranus motion
- And
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 1.354 hours of Venus motion
- So,
- 1 hour of Venus motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus motion
- This is our conclusion based on which the hypothesis is discussed, and then we
have found that many of Uranus and Venus motions data be created in
proportionality with the rate 17.7
53. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
53
- Venus & Uranus motions data almost depend on the rate (17.7 or 17.2) and by that
the hypothesis may be supported.
- The geometrical mechanism by which this data is created depended on the
hypothesis that (1 hour of Venus motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus motion).
54. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
54
5- (1 hour of Venus Motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus Motion) (More Proves)
5-1 Jupiter effect on Venus Uranus Motions interaction
5-2 Conclusions
5-1 Jupiter effect on Venus Uranus Motions interaction
I- Data
(1)
30589 x 2π x (17.7/24) = 142984 (1%)
(2)
30589 x 2π = 17.7 x 10921
(3)
4900 mkm = 6.6 x 742.5 mkm
(4)
2π x 742 mkm = 6 x 778.6 mkm
(5)
4331 days = 17.7 x 243 days
But
4331 = 6 x 720.7
(6)
449197 km = 12756 x 35 =12104 x (116.7/π)
55. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
55
II- Discussion
Equation no. (1)
30589 x 2π x (17.7/24) = 142984 (error 1%)
- Where
- 30589 days = Uranus Orbital Period
- 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
- Equation no. (1) tells that, Jupiter diameter is created in proportionality with
Uranus orbital period based on the rate (17.7/24) because 1 hour of Mercury
motion =24 hours of Uranus motion and 1 hour of Venus Motion = 17.7 hours of
Uranus motion
- The rate (17.7/24) proves clearly the paper hypothesis
- We should note that, Jupiter diameter is the basic value used in the (8 days cycle)
by that, Jupiter (8 days cycle) is defined because of Jupiter diameter creation as a
different distance between Jupiter motion distance during 8 Jupiter days and 8
Jupiter circumferences.
- Also Jupiter diameter is the difference between Uranus motion distance during 8
Pluto days and Jupiter motion distance during 64 Jupiter days
- That tells Jupiter diameter is a value has geometrical effect on the planets motions
- And
- We have seen that, Uranus orbital period (30589 days) is effective value on Uranus
day period (17.2 h) which we have discussed deeply before, that tells equation no.
(1) shows a part of the geometrical mechanism by which the motion is transported
between Venus and Uranus creating the rate of time (1 hour =17.7 hours).
- But
- Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) = Venus velocity (35 km/s) x 1.354
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 24 hours of Uranus motion
- And
- 1 hour of Mercury motion = 1.354 hours of Venus motion
56. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
56
Equation no. (2)
30589 x 2π = 17.7 x 10921
- Where
- 10921 km = The Earth Moon Circumference
- The moon circumference is defined by (almost) the same equation by which
Jupiter diameter is defined
- We know that,
- Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 seconds a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter
diameter where 10921 km = the moon circumference
- Not only but
- Jupiter circumference (449197 km) x the moon circumference (10921 km) = 4900
mkm = Jupiter orbital circumference
- Equation no. (2) tells that, the rate of time (1 hour = 17.7 hours) is the reason based
on which the moon and Jupiter diameters be created to be in so harmony for their
motions, because both are created based on the same geometrical necessity.
Equation no. (3)
4900 mkm = 6.6 x 742 mkm
- Where
- 4900 mkm = Jupiter orbital circumference
- 742 mkm = the distance passed by Uranus during 30589 hours
- Please remember
- This distance 742 mkm is so important distance because the moon displacements
total be equal it during (8445 solar days) where this value 8445 hours = 2 Mercury
Day period – based on this discussion we have discovered that 1 hour of Mercury
motion =48 hours of the moon motion.
- What's the rate 6.6?
57. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
57
- Jupiter velocity = 0.374 of Venus Velocity but 1 hour of Venus motion = 17.7
hours of Uranus motion, based on that 1 hour of Jupiter motion = 6.6 hours of
Uranus motion.
- The data provides more proves for the paper hypothesis…
Equation no. (4)
2π x 742 mkm = 6 x 778.6 mkm
- Where
- 778.6 mkm = Jupiter Orbital Distance
- Equation no. (4) tells that, the connection between Jupiter motion and the distance
742 mkm (which is passed by Uranus during 30589 hours) depends on the (6
periods cycle)
Equation no. (5)
4331 days = 17.7 x 243 days
But
4331 = 6 x 720.7
- Where
- 4331 solar days = Jupiter orbital period
- 243 solar days = Venus Rotation Period
- Equation no. (5) tells that, Jupiter orbital period will be = Venus rotation period if
the rate ( 1 hour =17.7 hours) is used
- The period 4331days depends on the distance 720.7 mkm (Mercury Jupiter
distance) by the (6 periods) Cycle.
Equation no. (6)
449197 km (Jupiter circumference) = 12756 x 35 =12104 x (116.7/π)
- 12756 km = Earth diameter
- 12104 km = Venus diameter
- 35 km/s = Venus velocity
- 116.75 solar days = Venus Day Period
58. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
58
References
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (II)
https://www.academia.edu/45181646/The_Moon_Orbital_Motion_Geometry_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-orbital-motion-geometry-ii
Light Motion Features Are Discovered in Planet Motion
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/light-motion-features-are-discovered-in-planet-motion
or
https://www.academia.edu/44286772/Light_Motion_Features_Are_Discovered_in_Planet_Motion
The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (II)
https://www.academia.edu/44368860/The_Moon_Motion_Trajectory_Analysis_II_
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous