The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)
Abstract
Paper Question
Can Planet diameter be created depending on a period of time? And can it be used as a period of time by the rate (1 km = 1 second)?
Paper question explanation
- One more time we have to ask
- Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
- What's the planet diameter according to Newton Vision?, But
- Jupiter diameter 142984 km can be = 4 Jupiter days periods total
- Saturn diameter 120536 km can be = (π x 10.7 h) (Saturn day period 10.7 h)
- The moon circumference can be = 1/8 of the solar day (if 1 km =1 sec)
- This data be considered as results of pure coincidences of numbers by Newton vision but more data shows that – in fact – Planet diameter be created as a function in some period of time and be used as a period of time – for example
- Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 s a distance = 421056 km = Uranus motion distance during its day period (where 12104 km = Venus diameter) and
- Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 155597 s a distance = 838000 km = 7 Saturn diameters = Saturn motion distance during a solar day
- Newton simply didn't see these motions because he supposed the planet diameter is a piece of rock created by some random process
- Newton theory of the sun gravity is mistaken because the theory components are not defined – the planet diameter is an example
- I want to say
- The solar system is a complex network of motions – Newton theory sees only the planets revolutions around the sun – and by that the basic part of motions be hidden and not defined by the theory
- As a result
- The planets motions features be far from Newton Theory- basically for 3 reasons which are
(1) The Motion Be Transported Among The Solar Planets
(2) The Solar System Distances Be Created Based On A Continuum –and not as individual independent distances
(3) The planets motions effect mutually on one another and these effects can't be attributed to the mass gravity forces
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
Can Saturn Motion effect on Venus Motion?
The Question Explanation
- The gravitation equation gives no hope for a significant effect from Saturn motion on Venus motion because of the great distance between the 2 planets
- But
- The 2 planets data shows that the 2 planets motions must be effective on one another. The data gives no room for doubt concerning this significant effect.
- The dilemma arises 2 basic arguments…
- The first argument tells that, Saturn motion effects on Venus motion, and that necessitates to search behind the data to find the method by which Saturn motion can effect on Venus motion where this method should be considered as another method of planet motion effect on another planet motion in addition to the gravitation equation.
- The second argument tells, (The Motion Be Transported Among The Planets). This argument is so significant because it gives us a solution to answer (how the motion at distance be done?) – and this argument may help to find a definition for the space.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Abstract
Paper Question
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Paper question explanation
(27.78 x π2/ 47.4 x2) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(35 x2 /24.1) = 2.86 (error 1.5%)
(4 x29.8 / 13.1π) = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(27.78 /9.7) = 2.86 (Zero error)
(24.1 x 2 / 5.4 π) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(2π x 13.1)/(5.4)2 = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(9.7 x 2/6.8) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(6.8 x 2/ 4.7) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(1.16/0.406) = 2.86 (Zero error)
- Where
- 47.4 km/s = Mercury velocity
- 35 km/s = Venus velocity
- 29.8 km/s = Earth velocity
- 27.78 km/s = The Earth Moon velocity
- 24.1 km/s = Mars velocity
- 13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity
- 6.8 km/s = Uranus velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
- 1.16 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during mars rotation period
- 0.406 mkm = Pluto motion distance during a solar day
- If The Planets Move By The Masses Gravity,
- Can All Planets Velocities Be Rated To One Another As Seen In The Equation, Where The Planets Masses Don't Show A Similar Proportionality?
Paper Objective
The paper disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity and disproves the Mass gravity force generally as a reason for the solar planets motions?
(The paper analyzes the planets velocities equation in details)
(The moon velocity =27.78 km/s is proved in point no. 7-11 of the paper)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GergesTawdrous1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerges-Tawdrous
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km (Part 2) (Revised)Gerges francis
This Paper discusses the following hypothesis:
("2A" are needed for "1B")
The Previous Rule Controls The Solar Planets Basic Data
Hypothesis Explanation
It tells – all basic solar planets data are created based on the previous rule – we need 2 Equal Values to interact with 1 different Value…
Example (No. 1)
Solar Planets Diameters Total = 2 Jupiter Diameters + 1 Saturn Diameter
How To Understand The Previous Idea:
Solar Group Is One Trajectory of Energy – Each Planet Is A Point On It
a. The Planet Matter (Mass) is Created of Energy (E=mc2supports that)
b. The Planet Orbital Distance (Space) is Created of Energy (Hypothesis)
Solar Group can be similar to one machine each plant is a gear in it (or one body and each planet is a member of this same body)
The Solar Group is Created from only One Energy
The Solar Planets and their orbital distances are created depending on Each Other
The basic solar planets data are created based on this rule ("2A" for "1B")
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Solar Group Creation And Motion
(A description which this paper tries to prove)
1- The Solar System Is created of one energy only - this one energy travels through the solar group from point to another point – creating the planet matter (because E=mc2) and planet orbital distance (because Space = Energy- My Hypothesis).
2- The Solar System Main Energy starts from Jupiter and travels to Pluto (from this energy Neptune orbital circumference is created consuming 16% of the total energy)
3- Neptune reflects the rest of energy toward the inner planets into 2 equal trajectories of energy
4- The Energy is sent from Neptune (and Pluto) to Mercury
5- Energy is sent from Mercury to Saturn
6- Pluto Motion specifically for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second (where this moving light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec – my hypothesis) – that means – 1 second of light motion causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
7- Solar group is created based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day (solar planets diameters total = 406000km= Pluto motion for 1 solar day)
8- Planets motions energies accumulations with 2 other factor effects – lead to produce the sun light beams… these 2 factors are
a. The sun rate of time is different from Earth one
b. Jupiter Energy Interaction with the planets velocities total
9- i.e. Planets Motions energies total produce the sun rays based on changing the sun rate of time and the interaction with Jupiter energy
10- The produce light beam will be 0.3 mkm/second but the original one is 1.16 mkm/sec – for that – the value 0.3 will multiply with 4……(0.3x4 =1.2 mkm/sec from this value the original light beam 1.16 mkm/sec is produced) (Why it multiplies with 4 - because earth has a cycle of 4 years – 1461 days)
11- The final product will be 1.16 mkm/sec moves for 1 second only to repeat the cycle for tomorrow…
Jupiter and mercury motions analysis (revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.3) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun is created after all solar planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun mass gravity decisively
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The paper analyzes the solar planet motion and compares it with Newton theory..
- Many new features be discovered and attributed to the planet motion and these features disprove also Newton theory in addition to the sun age theory.
1. Let's provide a list of these new discovered features in following:
2. The Solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion - By that the planets motions be similar to a machine of gears.
3. The Solar planets revolutions around the sun be done in equal periods of time
4. The Solar planets motions use different rates of time - by that the solar planets motions be similar to a great mechanical clock.
5. The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form. By that the solar system distances be similar to a chess board, each planet moves depending on the other planets motions and by using geometrical calculations
6. Mars and Pluto had migrated from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)
Abstract
Paper Question
Can Planet diameter be created depending on a period of time? And can it be used as a period of time by the rate (1 km = 1 second)?
Paper question explanation
- One more time we have to ask
- Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
- What's the planet diameter according to Newton Vision?, But
- Jupiter diameter 142984 km can be = 4 Jupiter days periods total
- Saturn diameter 120536 km can be = (π x 10.7 h) (Saturn day period 10.7 h)
- The moon circumference can be = 1/8 of the solar day (if 1 km =1 sec)
- This data be considered as results of pure coincidences of numbers by Newton vision but more data shows that – in fact – Planet diameter be created as a function in some period of time and be used as a period of time – for example
- Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 s a distance = 421056 km = Uranus motion distance during its day period (where 12104 km = Venus diameter) and
- Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 155597 s a distance = 838000 km = 7 Saturn diameters = Saturn motion distance during a solar day
- Newton simply didn't see these motions because he supposed the planet diameter is a piece of rock created by some random process
- Newton theory of the sun gravity is mistaken because the theory components are not defined – the planet diameter is an example
- I want to say
- The solar system is a complex network of motions – Newton theory sees only the planets revolutions around the sun – and by that the basic part of motions be hidden and not defined by the theory
- As a result
- The planets motions features be far from Newton Theory- basically for 3 reasons which are
(1) The Motion Be Transported Among The Solar Planets
(2) The Solar System Distances Be Created Based On A Continuum –and not as individual independent distances
(3) The planets motions effect mutually on one another and these effects can't be attributed to the mass gravity forces
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
Can Saturn Motion effect on Venus Motion?
The Question Explanation
- The gravitation equation gives no hope for a significant effect from Saturn motion on Venus motion because of the great distance between the 2 planets
- But
- The 2 planets data shows that the 2 planets motions must be effective on one another. The data gives no room for doubt concerning this significant effect.
- The dilemma arises 2 basic arguments…
- The first argument tells that, Saturn motion effects on Venus motion, and that necessitates to search behind the data to find the method by which Saturn motion can effect on Venus motion where this method should be considered as another method of planet motion effect on another planet motion in addition to the gravitation equation.
- The second argument tells, (The Motion Be Transported Among The Planets). This argument is so significant because it gives us a solution to answer (how the motion at distance be done?) – and this argument may help to find a definition for the space.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Abstract
Paper Question
How Planet Velocity Be Defined?
Paper question explanation
(27.78 x π2/ 47.4 x2) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(35 x2 /24.1) = 2.86 (error 1.5%)
(4 x29.8 / 13.1π) = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(27.78 /9.7) = 2.86 (Zero error)
(24.1 x 2 / 5.4 π) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(2π x 13.1)/(5.4)2 = 2.86 (error 1.3%)
(9.7 x 2/6.8) = 2.86 (error less 1%)
(6.8 x 2/ 4.7) = 2.86 (error 1%)
(1.16/0.406) = 2.86 (Zero error)
- Where
- 47.4 km/s = Mercury velocity
- 35 km/s = Venus velocity
- 29.8 km/s = Earth velocity
- 27.78 km/s = The Earth Moon velocity
- 24.1 km/s = Mars velocity
- 13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity
- 6.8 km/s = Uranus velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
- 1.16 mkm = Jupiter motion distance during mars rotation period
- 0.406 mkm = Pluto motion distance during a solar day
- If The Planets Move By The Masses Gravity,
- Can All Planets Velocities Be Rated To One Another As Seen In The Equation, Where The Planets Masses Don't Show A Similar Proportionality?
Paper Objective
The paper disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity and disproves the Mass gravity force generally as a reason for the solar planets motions?
(The paper analyzes the planets velocities equation in details)
(The moon velocity =27.78 km/s is proved in point no. 7-11 of the paper)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GergesTawdrous1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerges-Tawdrous
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km (Part 2) (Revised)Gerges francis
This Paper discusses the following hypothesis:
("2A" are needed for "1B")
The Previous Rule Controls The Solar Planets Basic Data
Hypothesis Explanation
It tells – all basic solar planets data are created based on the previous rule – we need 2 Equal Values to interact with 1 different Value…
Example (No. 1)
Solar Planets Diameters Total = 2 Jupiter Diameters + 1 Saturn Diameter
How To Understand The Previous Idea:
Solar Group Is One Trajectory of Energy – Each Planet Is A Point On It
a. The Planet Matter (Mass) is Created of Energy (E=mc2supports that)
b. The Planet Orbital Distance (Space) is Created of Energy (Hypothesis)
Solar Group can be similar to one machine each plant is a gear in it (or one body and each planet is a member of this same body)
The Solar Group is Created from only One Energy
The Solar Planets and their orbital distances are created depending on Each Other
The basic solar planets data are created based on this rule ("2A" for "1B")
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Solar Group Creation And Motion
(A description which this paper tries to prove)
1- The Solar System Is created of one energy only - this one energy travels through the solar group from point to another point – creating the planet matter (because E=mc2) and planet orbital distance (because Space = Energy- My Hypothesis).
2- The Solar System Main Energy starts from Jupiter and travels to Pluto (from this energy Neptune orbital circumference is created consuming 16% of the total energy)
3- Neptune reflects the rest of energy toward the inner planets into 2 equal trajectories of energy
4- The Energy is sent from Neptune (and Pluto) to Mercury
5- Energy is sent from Mercury to Saturn
6- Pluto Motion specifically for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second (where this moving light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec – my hypothesis) – that means – 1 second of light motion causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
7- Solar group is created based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day (solar planets diameters total = 406000km= Pluto motion for 1 solar day)
8- Planets motions energies accumulations with 2 other factor effects – lead to produce the sun light beams… these 2 factors are
a. The sun rate of time is different from Earth one
b. Jupiter Energy Interaction with the planets velocities total
9- i.e. Planets Motions energies total produce the sun rays based on changing the sun rate of time and the interaction with Jupiter energy
10- The produce light beam will be 0.3 mkm/second but the original one is 1.16 mkm/sec – for that – the value 0.3 will multiply with 4……(0.3x4 =1.2 mkm/sec from this value the original light beam 1.16 mkm/sec is produced) (Why it multiplies with 4 - because earth has a cycle of 4 years – 1461 days)
11- The final product will be 1.16 mkm/sec moves for 1 second only to repeat the cycle for tomorrow…
Jupiter and mercury motions analysis (revised) (2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.3) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun is created after all solar planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun mass gravity decisively
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The paper analyzes the solar planet motion and compares it with Newton theory..
- Many new features be discovered and attributed to the planet motion and these features disprove also Newton theory in addition to the sun age theory.
1. Let's provide a list of these new discovered features in following:
2. The Solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion - By that the planets motions be similar to a machine of gears.
3. The Solar planets revolutions around the sun be done in equal periods of time
4. The Solar planets motions use different rates of time - by that the solar planets motions be similar to a great mechanical clock.
5. The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form. By that the solar system distances be similar to a chess board, each planet moves depending on the other planets motions and by using geometrical calculations
6. Mars and Pluto had migrated from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Mars ancient orbital distance was 84 mkm and changed to be 227.9 mkm later.
The hypothesis explanation
- Mars was the next planet after Mercury with orbital distance =84 mkm and Mars had migrated into Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)
- Through Mars Displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), Mars had collided with Venus and then with Earth and then reach to its current orbital distance point
- By these collisions debris the Earth could create its own moon and also Mars moons are created in addition to the asteroid belt.
- Means, Mars itself caused the Earth moon creation by its Migration in place of the Planet (Theia) supposed by the Giant-impact hypothesis.
- Mars Migration theory answers the Giant-impact hypothesis questions, are:
- What's The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?– It's Venus
- Why Venus couldn't create its own moon from the collisions debris? Because Mars had moved from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), So Mars had pushed all debris in its motion direction because of that Venus found no debris around it to create its own moon, But Earth gravity is grater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their motion momentum, because of that Earth could create its own moon.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) (2)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
-The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
-The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
-Because
-The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
-Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
-The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Solar planets order disproves the gravity theoryGerges francis
Abstract
- The Solar Planets order proves that, the planet orbital distance is defined based on his Diameter and NOT his Mass, which disproves the Gravity Theory..
But
- Planet Diameter and Orbital Distance Relationship Equation is so hard to define…! Why?
Because
- The solar Group has 2 Heads (The Sun and Earth).
The Solar Group is A Dipole….
We need to modify the Solar Group Basic Description to be " A Dipole System"…
- This paper also discusses the Sun nature and Origin…
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
The solar system design disproves newton theory (revised)Gerges francis
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Motion Depends On A Light Beam Motion Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar system motion depends on a light beam motion.
The hypothesis explanation
- There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec in the solar system
- The solar system is created out of this light beam energy. The light energy creates The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances
- Based on this vision
- The solar system motion depends on this light beam motion.
- As a result
- This light beam effects are seen frequently in the planets motions data. because the planet is similar to a puppet on the puppets theater, the light motion is the main player behind and by that the light moves by using planets motions data and the light motion effects on these planets motions data.
- The hypothesis tells another universe be found behind the universe of matter and the important news is that, the hidden universe causes the matter universe motion.
- By that, the solar planets don't move by the sun mass gravity. The solar planets are similar to ships found on a sea they move by this sea waves. Where the sea is the light motions, because of that the light motions define the planets motions range and creates their motions data.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the light motion existence behind the planets motions and proves also that the light motion cause the planets motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Pluto And The Moon Motions Are Effected By The Earth Motion.
The hypothesis Explanation
- I use the planets data analysis to discover the solar planets creation and motions.
- The planets data shows the following fact….
- Pluto Day Period be =153.3 hours because Pluto day period depends on The Earth moon day period (708.7h). That explains why Pluto day period is so long in comparison with the outer planets days periods. The fact is that, Pluto day period is created as a function in the Earth Moon Day Period.
- On the other side, the moon orbital apogee radius which should be = 413600 km became =406000 km because of Pluto motion effect on the moon orbital motion.
- Paper Objective
- Because no physics theory can give an explanation for such dependency found between 2 small masses planets which are at a huge distance between them, I have to prove this dependency between the 2 planets by all means. And as a result for these proves, we have to search after the method by which this dependency can be created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
- The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
- The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
- Because
- The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
- Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found? (Newton is Wrong) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planet Moves BY Light Motion
Paper hypothesis explanation
- The basic question in the solar system motion is (Do we understand the planets real positions?)
- Newton Theory tells Planet moves by the sun mass gravity force, can that be real? Of course not –Why? because
- The planets motions data show effects of Planets masses gravities on one another - for example – The moon be created by the Earth gravity –that shows an effect of Earth gravity on the moon creation and motion – based on that – Earth gravity effect be seen in the moon creation and motion data – on the other side – No any planet data refers to the sun gravity effect on it?
- Earth gravity is an example of Planets gravities effects on one another where the planets data show clearly that, But no planet data refers to any effect of the sun gravity on it! Why? What options we have to solve this dilemma?
- (a) Can we suppose that the sun mass is an imaginary one and not fact? Or
- (b) Can we suppose that the sun be in some position prevents its gravity effect on the planets motions? to make this question more clear let’s ask –
- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance. Let's ask (Are the Sun, Saturn and Uranus be on one line with an angle 180 degrees or 90 degrees?) Can the planets positions create a distinguish in The Mass Gravity Using?
- But if no sun gravity be found why the planets revolve around the sun? we have discussed this question before(Part No. I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) Gerges francis
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Arguments
- The paper provides 2 basic arguments
- (1st Argument)
- The Paper disproves Newton Theory of The sun mass gravity and proves that the solar planets motions can't be independent motions from one another but each planet motion depends on other planets motions.
- This discussion concludes that, the solar system distances be created in a network form, integrated together in one geometrical design.
- The argument conclusion is (The solar planet move one unified general motion)
- The 1st Argument Depends On (Jupiter Motion Analysis)
- (2nd Argument)
- The Paper claims that the solar planets motions be accompanying with a light beam motion which provides the required energy for the planets and their distances creation (because matter is created of energy and space is created of energy)
- The light motion accompanying with the solar planets motions cause the planets to move one unified general motion.
- The 2nd Argument Depends On (Mercury Motion Analysis)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar System Geometrical Design depends on Mars and Pluto Motions
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Group is a machine of gears and each planet motion be used as a gear in it, the planets motions be integrated one another and create one unified motion.
- This vision tells, the solar system distances must be created as a network designed geometrically based on the planets positions and motions.
- The vision makes the solar group as a train and the planets as carriages in one train
- Accordingly, Planet motion can't be independent from the others'
- The dependency of motions among the planets depends on the planets motions periods, because each planet creates its own rate of time to perform the integration among the planets motions to create the planets unified general motion.
- Based on this vision, each planet position and motion data be defined in comparison with the other planets positions and data. As a result, the planets motions be similar to chess board pieces motions. each motion depends on the others and be calculated geometrically
- The vision disproves The Sun Mass Gravity Of Newton, and also Planet Motion Independency Concept which is inherited of Newton theory, because it tells the solar system moves by one geometrical design creates the planets data and motions.
- And
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury, and Pluto was the Mercury Moon.
- Some great strike caused Mars and Pluto to migrate from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
- By the planets migration, the solar system distances network be confused and needed a repair and by that, the solar system design takes Mars and Pluto as the basic 2 points to redesign the solar system distances Network
- The solar system design caused to create new 2 Planets (The moon and Saturn), to support the solar system redesign process.
Paper Objective
- The paper explains the solar system design, proving that Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken (this discussion be the paper part No. (II) under the title "The Solar System Creation Theory")
- The paper explains the changes be occurred by Mars and Pluto migration in the solar system design, proving the planets migration event (Part no. (I) of this paper under title (The Solar System Design Description)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.2) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Neptune Motion Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance
- This fact tells, if Uranus and Earth velocities be equal, while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 complete revolutions (19.2 years) - But
- The Earth moon moves a cycle called Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years. this fact creates a puzzle because Earth Cycle is 4 years only (365+365+365+366 =1461 days) and by that the Earth itself doesn't know about Metonic Cycle –
- The question be (How does the moon move Metonic Cycle if Earth doesn't?)
- The answer is …
- Uranus motion effects on the moon motion and caused the moon to move Metonic Cycle (19 years) – Simply, Metonic Cycle is the result of Uranus Motion effect on the moon motion.
- Now, Why The Nobel Prize Decision For Physics 2021 Is Mistaken?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The sun gravity concept is incorrect (newton was wrong) (revised)Gerges francis
The Sun Gravity Concept is Incorrect (Newton Was Wrong) (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Don't Move By The Sun Masses Gravity Force.
The Hypothesis Explanation
Newton Was Wrong Because Of The Following Reasons:
- (First Reason)
- The Planets Motions Provide Energy, And This Energy be seen in a clear trajectory shows the real motion trajectory. The energy starts from the inner planets, then transports to Jupiter and from Jupiter to the outer planets till reach to Pluto and then the energy be reflected from Pluto to Neptune and then from Neptune to the inner planets again. This trajectory of energy is defined by directed data and proved the motion trajectory.
- That shows Why Newton is wrong. Because Planet Motion doesn't depend on the sun but depend on another planet motion. by that the solar group is a network connected each point with its neighbor point and by that the line between the sun and the planet has no any effect or role in the planet motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Space is Energy
This supports the claim
"There's A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance"
This paper discusses and tries to prove this fact
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...Gerges francis
A claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision – in Physics -2018
Best Greetings
I send this paper as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board - for their decision - for Nobel Prize in physics 2018
Of course I have nothing against the great people who receive the Nobel Prize in Physics 2018 and I congratulate them for their great works
But at my side, I found there's a serious question here
Because I explained frequently in my research that, there's a serious contradiction in physics current theories and we can't understand the solar group geometry if no one solves this contradiction…
I Provided many hard arguments to prove this claim and thought that, the Nobel Prize Board will support me to solve this contradiction in physics.
But I found the Board decision avoids my work!
For that reason I summarized the main idea in this paper and send it as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board
And I wish the board will accept to give me a chance to explain and defend my point of view..
With the Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Mars ancient orbital distance was 84 mkm and changed to be 227.9 mkm later.
The hypothesis explanation
- Mars was the next planet after Mercury with orbital distance =84 mkm and Mars had migrated into Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)
- Through Mars Displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), Mars had collided with Venus and then with Earth and then reach to its current orbital distance point
- By these collisions debris the Earth could create its own moon and also Mars moons are created in addition to the asteroid belt.
- Means, Mars itself caused the Earth moon creation by its Migration in place of the Planet (Theia) supposed by the Giant-impact hypothesis.
- Mars Migration theory answers the Giant-impact hypothesis questions, are:
- What's The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?– It's Venus
- Why Venus couldn't create its own moon from the collisions debris? Because Mars had moved from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), So Mars had pushed all debris in its motion direction because of that Venus found no debris around it to create its own moon, But Earth gravity is grater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their motion momentum, because of that Earth could create its own moon.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) (2)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
-The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
-The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
-Because
-The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
-Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
-The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Mercury Motion Data Analysis Disproves Newton Theory
Paper hypothesis
Saturn moves by a velocity = 0.99 c (where c = 300000 km per second)
Saturn almost moves by light velocity, and this high velocity motion creates relativistic effects in the solar system data
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Again
- I claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021, because
- Saturn moves by light velocity, and
- No planet moves by the sun mass gravity, because, the matter is created out of light and moves with its parent light by using different rates of time. As a result, the solar planets motions use different rates of time, and by using these different rates of time, Saturn can travel by a velocity = 99% of light velocity (300000 km/s)
- Shortly
- Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken, and tenths of papers provided huge number of proves against this theory – now – the theory lived for 400 years spite its an imaginary idea and wrong in its principle - But
- The Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021 sees nothing of all that! they provide no help for any real progress in the solar system motion understudying. They save the wrong theory of Newton spite the planets data contradicts it frequently
- This paper provides one more feature of planets real motion disproving Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity – and providing a claim against the decision 2021–
- No one has the right to mislead the humanity to learn the lies in place of the real knowledge and facts. No one has the authority and no can face the responsibility of all human misleading and misguiding
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Solar planets order disproves the gravity theoryGerges francis
Abstract
- The Solar Planets order proves that, the planet orbital distance is defined based on his Diameter and NOT his Mass, which disproves the Gravity Theory..
But
- Planet Diameter and Orbital Distance Relationship Equation is so hard to define…! Why?
Because
- The solar Group has 2 Heads (The Sun and Earth).
The Solar Group is A Dipole….
We need to modify the Solar Group Basic Description to be " A Dipole System"…
- This paper also discusses the Sun nature and Origin…
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
The solar system design disproves newton theory (revised)Gerges francis
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Motion Depends On A Light Beam Motion Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar system motion depends on a light beam motion.
The hypothesis explanation
- There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec in the solar system
- The solar system is created out of this light beam energy. The light energy creates The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances
- Based on this vision
- The solar system motion depends on this light beam motion.
- As a result
- This light beam effects are seen frequently in the planets motions data. because the planet is similar to a puppet on the puppets theater, the light motion is the main player behind and by that the light moves by using planets motions data and the light motion effects on these planets motions data.
- The hypothesis tells another universe be found behind the universe of matter and the important news is that, the hidden universe causes the matter universe motion.
- By that, the solar planets don't move by the sun mass gravity. The solar planets are similar to ships found on a sea they move by this sea waves. Where the sea is the light motions, because of that the light motions define the planets motions range and creates their motions data.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the light motion existence behind the planets motions and proves also that the light motion cause the planets motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Pluto And The Moon Motions Are Effected By The Earth Motion.
The hypothesis Explanation
- I use the planets data analysis to discover the solar planets creation and motions.
- The planets data shows the following fact….
- Pluto Day Period be =153.3 hours because Pluto day period depends on The Earth moon day period (708.7h). That explains why Pluto day period is so long in comparison with the outer planets days periods. The fact is that, Pluto day period is created as a function in the Earth Moon Day Period.
- On the other side, the moon orbital apogee radius which should be = 413600 km became =406000 km because of Pluto motion effect on the moon orbital motion.
- Paper Objective
- Because no physics theory can give an explanation for such dependency found between 2 small masses planets which are at a huge distance between them, I have to prove this dependency between the 2 planets by all means. And as a result for these proves, we have to search after the method by which this dependency can be created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system is created out of one light beam its velocity (1.16 mkm/sec), and moves depending on this light beam motion, And
- The light (1.16 mkm/sec) created the solar system distances in a network form.
The hypothesis explanation
- The existence proves of light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) depend on the solar system distances network proves.
- Because
- The solar system distances be created depending on each other by using the light motion that caused the distances to be created in a network form, or based on one geometrical design.
- Where (Distance = Energy). The distances creation process needed energy which is provided by light motion. by that, light energy be registered in the created distances, and by analysis of the distances values we can conclude that these distances be created by energy provided by a light beam. And also we can discover this light beam velocity be (1.16 mkm/s) because this light beam energy and motion features are registered in the created distances.
Paper objective
- The paper proves the solar system distances network and based on this proof, the paper proves the light supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/s) existence.
Paper Conclusion
- Because the solar system be created out of light supposed velocity (=1.16mkm/s) and the sun light velocity (= 0.3 mkm/s)
- Means, the light (0.3mkm/)be created as a side product from the original one (1.16 mkm/s)
- That proves
- The Sun Is Created After All Solar Planets Creation And Motion Which Disproves Decisively Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
How does the planet move if no sun gravity be found (newton is wrong) (ii)Gerges francis
How Does The Planet Move If No Sun Gravity Be Found? (Newton is Wrong) (II)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planet Moves BY Light Motion
Paper hypothesis explanation
- The basic question in the solar system motion is (Do we understand the planets real positions?)
- Newton Theory tells Planet moves by the sun mass gravity force, can that be real? Of course not –Why? because
- The planets motions data show effects of Planets masses gravities on one another - for example – The moon be created by the Earth gravity –that shows an effect of Earth gravity on the moon creation and motion – based on that – Earth gravity effect be seen in the moon creation and motion data – on the other side – No any planet data refers to the sun gravity effect on it?
- Earth gravity is an example of Planets gravities effects on one another where the planets data show clearly that, But no planet data refers to any effect of the sun gravity on it! Why? What options we have to solve this dilemma?
- (a) Can we suppose that the sun mass is an imaginary one and not fact? Or
- (b) Can we suppose that the sun be in some position prevents its gravity effect on the planets motions? to make this question more clear let’s ask –
- Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance. Let's ask (Are the Sun, Saturn and Uranus be on one line with an angle 180 degrees or 90 degrees?) Can the planets positions create a distinguish in The Mass Gravity Using?
- But if no sun gravity be found why the planets revolve around the sun? we have discussed this question before(Part No. I)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory) Gerges francis
The Refutation Of The Sun Mass Gravity Theory (Newton Theory)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Motions Can't Be Created by The Sun Mass Gravity.
- The solar planets motions features show a type of motion can’t be created by the sun mass gravity force if found. (Newton Theory is Mistaken)
The Solar Planets Motions Description
- The solar planets motions be complementary with one another and integrated together, creating One Unified General Motion.
- The planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Arguments
- The paper provides 2 basic arguments
- (1st Argument)
- The Paper disproves Newton Theory of The sun mass gravity and proves that the solar planets motions can't be independent motions from one another but each planet motion depends on other planets motions.
- This discussion concludes that, the solar system distances be created in a network form, integrated together in one geometrical design.
- The argument conclusion is (The solar planet move one unified general motion)
- The 1st Argument Depends On (Jupiter Motion Analysis)
- (2nd Argument)
- The Paper claims that the solar planets motions be accompanying with a light beam motion which provides the required energy for the planets and their distances creation (because matter is created of energy and space is created of energy)
- The light motion accompanying with the solar planets motions cause the planets to move one unified general motion.
- The 2nd Argument Depends On (Mercury Motion Analysis)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar System Geometrical Design depends on Mars and Pluto Motions
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Group is a machine of gears and each planet motion be used as a gear in it, the planets motions be integrated one another and create one unified motion.
- This vision tells, the solar system distances must be created as a network designed geometrically based on the planets positions and motions.
- The vision makes the solar group as a train and the planets as carriages in one train
- Accordingly, Planet motion can't be independent from the others'
- The dependency of motions among the planets depends on the planets motions periods, because each planet creates its own rate of time to perform the integration among the planets motions to create the planets unified general motion.
- Based on this vision, each planet position and motion data be defined in comparison with the other planets positions and data. As a result, the planets motions be similar to chess board pieces motions. each motion depends on the others and be calculated geometrically
- The vision disproves The Sun Mass Gravity Of Newton, and also Planet Motion Independency Concept which is inherited of Newton theory, because it tells the solar system moves by one geometrical design creates the planets data and motions.
- And
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury, and Pluto was the Mercury Moon.
- Some great strike caused Mars and Pluto to migrate from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
- By the planets migration, the solar system distances network be confused and needed a repair and by that, the solar system design takes Mars and Pluto as the basic 2 points to redesign the solar system distances Network
- The solar system design caused to create new 2 Planets (The moon and Saturn), to support the solar system redesign process.
Paper Objective
- The paper explains the solar system design, proving that Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken (this discussion be the paper part No. (II) under the title "The Solar System Creation Theory")
- The paper explains the changes be occurred by Mars and Pluto migration in the solar system design, proving the planets migration event (Part no. (I) of this paper under title (The Solar System Design Description)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.2) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Neptune Motion Analysis Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021 Is Mistaken
Paper hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance
- This fact tells, if Uranus and Earth velocities be equal, while Uranus revolves around the sun one complete revolution Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 complete revolutions (19.2 years) - But
- The Earth moon moves a cycle called Metonic Cycle extends for 19 years. this fact creates a puzzle because Earth Cycle is 4 years only (365+365+365+366 =1461 days) and by that the Earth itself doesn't know about Metonic Cycle –
- The question be (How does the moon move Metonic Cycle if Earth doesn't?)
- The answer is …
- Uranus motion effects on the moon motion and caused the moon to move Metonic Cycle (19 years) – Simply, Metonic Cycle is the result of Uranus Motion effect on the moon motion.
- Now, Why The Nobel Prize Decision For Physics 2021 Is Mistaken?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The sun gravity concept is incorrect (newton was wrong) (revised)Gerges francis
The Sun Gravity Concept is Incorrect (Newton Was Wrong) (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Don't Move By The Sun Masses Gravity Force.
The Hypothesis Explanation
Newton Was Wrong Because Of The Following Reasons:
- (First Reason)
- The Planets Motions Provide Energy, And This Energy be seen in a clear trajectory shows the real motion trajectory. The energy starts from the inner planets, then transports to Jupiter and from Jupiter to the outer planets till reach to Pluto and then the energy be reflected from Pluto to Neptune and then from Neptune to the inner planets again. This trajectory of energy is defined by directed data and proved the motion trajectory.
- That shows Why Newton is wrong. Because Planet Motion doesn't depend on the sun but depend on another planet motion. by that the solar group is a network connected each point with its neighbor point and by that the line between the sun and the planet has no any effect or role in the planet motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Space is Energy
This supports the claim
"There's A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance"
This paper discusses and tries to prove this fact
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...Gerges francis
A claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision – in Physics -2018
Best Greetings
I send this paper as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board - for their decision - for Nobel Prize in physics 2018
Of course I have nothing against the great people who receive the Nobel Prize in Physics 2018 and I congratulate them for their great works
But at my side, I found there's a serious question here
Because I explained frequently in my research that, there's a serious contradiction in physics current theories and we can't understand the solar group geometry if no one solves this contradiction…
I Provided many hard arguments to prove this claim and thought that, the Nobel Prize Board will support me to solve this contradiction in physics.
But I found the Board decision avoids my work!
For that reason I summarized the main idea in this paper and send it as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board
And I wish the board will accept to give me a chance to explain and defend my point of view..
With the Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Kepler 3rd law explanation part no.2 (to support my claim against nobel priz...Gerges francis
Kepler 3rd Law tells that
(d3/t2) = constant where (d= Planet orbital distance, and t= Planet orbital period)
Why (d3/t2) = constant?
Because…
d3 is Energy In Space Form
t2 is Energy In Mass Form
Kepler 3rd Law supports my claim.. That
The solar group is one machine or one body each planet is a member in this body
That tells us
From the same energy the planet matter and his orbital distance are created which provides one source for the whole solar group and guarantees the Planets Motions General Harmony…
This paper aims to support my claim against the Nobel Prize board decision- in physics -2018)
This claim details are written in my previous paper
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
Solar system geometry (summarized discussion part 2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Sun Rays Is Produced By Planets Motions Energies Accumulations
The paper tries to prove this fact
Solar Group Alternative Description
1- The solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory …i.e.
2- The Solar Group is One Building and each planet is a part of this same building-
3- Also The solar group is similar to a train and each planet is a carriage of it.
4- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in it
5- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine, each planet is a gear in it
6- Planet moves with all other planets together as a train moves with all carriages –
Description Basic Concept
Planets cooperation and integration is the reason of their existence and motions.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy.. Can that be possible?
Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for same content, i.e. it's possible to create matter & space of energy
Another Example
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the experiment explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used (light)–outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data complementary to each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis shows the solar planets dependency.
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Mercury Jupiter Distance with Mercury other data supports my claim that,
"The Solar Group is One Machine, Each planet is One Gear In It"
Let's review this idea here again….. I suggest that,
The Matter is created from Energy (this is true based on the Equation E=mc2)
The Distance is created from Energy (my hypothesis)
That means, the Matter and Distance are created from the same Energy,
That means, the whole solar group is created from the same one energy which guarantees the motions harmony.
The matter should be seen as point of light coherence or energy lines connection where the energy is carried in the distances as in matters
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Planet Diameter & Orbital Distance Relationship (A Theoretical Analysis)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
There's A Relationship Between Planet Orbital Distance And Its Diameter.
(2)
- Human vision and realization process effects on the universe around
- The Matter is created as an effect of human mind on the universe around – Matter has no real existence.
i.e.
- Matter is created based on Human Vision (And Realization Process)- which depends on the distance – that explains why there's a relationship between planet diameter and orbital distance.
- There's no a proved relationship between planet orbital distance and its mass (In Planets Data) because the mass can't be measured by a vision
- That explains Planet diameter and orbital distance relationship reason
- That makes many of physics laws around us are rooted in human mind knowledge and realization process which explains why Planets move according to physics laws and not simply in chaos.
Shortly
- Human mind is a player in solar group geometry and without discovering of its geometrical role –the solar group geometry will be obscure forever
Does mars fit his position is the solar group why notGerges francis
The Claim
Mars Data Doesn't Fit his Position In The Solar Group
Because
Mars had immigrated from his original point with distance 84 million km from the sun and dwell in his new point with distance 227.9 million km from the sun (My Conclusion)
So Mars Data was fit to his original position (with distance 84 mkm)
But
Mars Data doesn't fit his new position (with distance 227.9 mkm)
This paper analyzes Mars Data to prove this Fact.
The solar planets different motions are working as gears motions have different rates of time, they use Light Motion Energy for 1 second period and produce this same Energy in 1 Day Period of a Planet Motion…
And by this process the solar planets transform the period of 1 second into 1 day period which produces the solar day…
The solar Day production is the solar planets different motions main job.
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion) Gerges francis
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion)
The Solar Group Geometrical Basic Features:
1- The Solar Group is One Trajectory of Energy and Each Planet is A point on it
2- The sun light is produced by accumulation of planets motions energies and transformation the mechanical waves into light waves
3- Solar Planets Data are created relative to each other
4- There Are relativistic effects in the solar group
5- The unit definition is relative and can change according to the observer situation
This paper discusses and tries to prove the previous features
Research 1st hypothesis discussion (ii) (revised)Gerges francis
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Paper Main Question
Why Does Uranus Orbital Distance = Saturn Orbital Diameter?
(Why does Saturn orbital distance = Saturn Uranus distance?)
Space Definition and Features
- Solar Planets are theater of puppets connecting by one trajectory of energy.
- Space is Energy and created as a result of light motion
- Uranus Orbital Distance is the solar system first distance created as a result of light motion for 1 second (1 second of light motion is equivalent to 1 solar day of planet motion – 3rd hypothesis)
- Saturn Orbital Distance is a defined distance by the solar system motion per a solar day
- Uranus and Saturn orbital distances are produced by one motion done in the same period of time by Earth Moon Effect.
- Earth Moon has no this great energy to effect on Saturn and Uranus orbital distances, but Earth Moon is the solar system general energy indicator and he defines where the energy will pass –that shows his effect secret.
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)Gerges francis
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
Solar planets motions trajectory is a pyramid or a cone (part ii)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Trajectory is A Pyramid Form and Not A Cone
Let's summarize the idea in following:
I- The Solar Planets are Found On Different Horizontal Levels (Steps) Which makes The Solar Group As A Ladder. Based On That, When The Planets revolve Around The Sun, They create A Pyramid Form For Their Motions Trajectory (The Main Hypothesis)
II- The Planet revolution around the sun which we see in ellipse form in fact it's square form.
III- i.e. What we see in circle (ellipse form), Its real form is (a square)
IV- For that reason the Planets motions Trajectory is A Pyramid and not A Cone
This Paper tries to prove this fact
Mass Is Distributed Through Solar System
Paper Hypothesis
1- Planet Mass Is Not A Planet Property But Distributed Based On Solar System Geometrical Rules
2- Mass Distribution Proves That Solar Group Is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building- And The Energy Is Transported Through The Solar Group To Create The Planet Matter And Orbital Distance.
3- Saturn Is Solar System Central Point (i.e. Saturn Is Solar System Motor)
4- Mass Distribution aims To create Different Rates Of Time Between The Solar Planets Motions.
The Moon Orbit Analysis
Earth Moon motion has specific 4 points which are:
1. Perigee Point (R1) : Radius 363000 km from Earth (the nearest point)
2. Total Solar Eclipse (R2) : Radius 377000 km from Earth
3. Average Moon Orbit (R3) : Radius 384000 km (registered)
4. Apogee Point (R4) : Radius 406000 km from Earth (the most far point)
These 4 points are defined by 4 geometrical rules which are:
- (1st Rule) Pythagoras rule : R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1
(why 86000 km? we'll discuss that in this paper)
- (2nd Rule) Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn= (1/Rn+1)
- (3rd Rule) (Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn+1/ Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn) =1.0725
- (4th Rule) The Rate 365.25
This paper tries to prove this fact, and discusses more deep question… why the moon orbital different radiuses are defined by these 4 geometrical rules?
The Paper Claim
The Solar Group Is One Body
The Claim Explanation & Features
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building ….Or
2- The Solar group is One Trajectory of Energy And Each Planet Is A Point On This Same Energy Trajectory…. Or
3- The Solar Group Is One Machine And Each Planet Is A Gear In It… Or
4- The Solar Group Is A Great River And Each Planet Is A Canal of this same river
5- The solar group has One Great Job which is divided into integrated tasks for each planet has one task which should be integrated and cooperated with other planets tasks to perform the General One Great Job….
i.e.
6- Each Planet Data (Diameter- Mass- Orbital Distance -…. etc) is created to be suitable for this planet required task in the whole building and No Solar Planet Single Data Can Be Created Independently
That leads to this paper main hypothesis, let's refer to it in following…
A Hypothesis:-
"The Solar Planet Data Is Created Based On Geometrical And Physical Reasons"
The previous hypothesis provides us 3 results:
1- The Solar Group Is One Building
2- The Solar Planets Motions Harmony Is Found Based On The Planet Construction & Formulation (Planet Data) And Not By The Gravity Forces
3- Any Planet Data Can Be Deduced From The Other Planets Data Analysis
Light Velocity Effect On Solar System Geometry (Part II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
- Space = Energy
- Space is created by light motion
i.e.
- Light motion can create a distance
If
- Light creates a new distance by its motion – we may see this distance as a period of time
But
- If the light pass through a distance found already and not new one – we may see this distance as a distance and not period of time
- This idea supports 2 basic claim which are
- 1st / Time and Distance Values can be equivalent in higher velocity
- 2nd/ Space is Energy and be created by light motion
Paper Basic Question
Why do we analyze Jupiter Data and effect on different Planets?
Because
I try to prove that,
-The planets motions are light motions but we see them motions in planets motions form
-It's a light beam which causes the planets to move in front of us in the sky
-There's no gravity from the sun, there's no Big Bang theory – No more imaginations
-It's A Light Beam Motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter uranus distance (metonic cycle reason) (revised)Gerges francis
1- Metonic Cycle is Energy sent from Uranus to the moon
2- Pluto also effects on Metonic Cycle
3-There's a relationship between Earth and the Moon at one side and Pluto at the other side
4- There's a relationship between Jupiter and Uranus at one side and Pluto at the other side
5- There's a relationship between Mercury and Pluto.
The previous relationships are found because
The solar group is one body (or one machine), and the solar planets are members in this body, and as the body blood connects all remembers. similar to that, the solar group is created from one energy, and this one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance and connects all planets together in one system, which makes the solar group as one body (or one Energy trajectory).
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Slide 1: Title Slide
Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Slide 2: Introduction to Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Definition: Extrachromosomal inheritance refers to the transmission of genetic material that is not found within the nucleus.
Key Components: Involves genes located in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and plasmids.
Slide 3: Mitochondrial Inheritance
Mitochondria: Organelles responsible for energy production.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in mitochondria.
Inheritance Pattern: Maternally inherited, meaning it is passed from mothers to all their offspring.
Diseases: Examples include Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and mitochondrial myopathy.
Slide 4: Chloroplast Inheritance
Chloroplasts: Organelles responsible for photosynthesis in plants.
Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA): Circular DNA molecule found in chloroplasts.
Inheritance Pattern: Often maternally inherited in most plants, but can vary in some species.
Examples: Variegation in plants, where leaf color patterns are determined by chloroplast DNA.
Slide 5: Plasmid Inheritance
Plasmids: Small, circular DNA molecules found in bacteria and some eukaryotes.
Features: Can carry antibiotic resistance genes and can be transferred between cells through processes like conjugation.
Significance: Important in biotechnology for gene cloning and genetic engineering.
Slide 6: Mechanisms of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Non-Mendelian Patterns: Do not follow Mendel’s laws of inheritance.
Cytoplasmic Segregation: During cell division, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are randomly distributed to daughter cells.
Heteroplasmy: Presence of more than one type of organellar genome within a cell, leading to variation in expression.
Slide 7: Examples of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Four O’clock Plant (Mirabilis jalapa): Shows variegated leaves due to different cpDNA in leaf cells.
Petite Mutants in Yeast: Result from mutations in mitochondrial DNA affecting respiration.
Slide 8: Importance of Extrachromosomal Inheritance
Evolution: Provides insight into the evolution of eukaryotic cells.
Medicine: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance helps in diagnosing and treating mitochondrial diseases.
Agriculture: Chloroplast inheritance can be used in plant breeding and genetic modification.
Slide 9: Recent Research and Advances
Gene Editing: Techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 are being used to edit mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.
Therapies: Development of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) for preventing mitochondrial diseases.
Slide 10: Conclusion
Summary: Extrachromosomal inheritance involves the transmission of genetic material outside the nucleus and plays a crucial role in genetics, medicine, and biotechnology.
Future Directions: Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for new treatments and applications.
Slide 11: Questions and Discussion
Invite Audience: Open the floor for any questions or further discussion on the topic.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...
Definition of space
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Definition of Space
By Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
course student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
TEL +201022532292 georgytawdrous@yandex.ru / mrwaheid@gmail.com
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 12th
October 2018
Abstract
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different
forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
This paper aims to support my claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision –
in Physics -2018?
I provided the claim reason in my previous paper
Kepler 3rd
Law Explanation (a Claim Against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
1- Introduction
All my ideas and suggested theories depend on solar planets data analysis..
For example,
When we found that "d" (Mercury orbital distance) = "r" (Mercury diameter) x 1092
, and
found that Earth and Saturn follow this same Equation perfectly
(please review this Equation in "kepler 3rd
law Explanation" http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053)
The previous data pushed me to expect that, there's a relationship between the planet
diameter and his orbital distance…. based on this expectation the following questions were
produced…
Is there a real relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? How this
relationship can be created? And why some solar planets follow the Equation and other
planets don't?
The total solar eclipse phenomena supports the claim that, there's a relationship between the
planet diameter and his orbital distance…we can find this support when we answer our old
question… why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? Because (Sun diameter / Moon
diameter) = (Earth orbital distance /Earth moon distance)… why the diameters rate = the
distances rate? The usual answer was "by pure coincidence" in this case nothing can be
learnt ….!
But if the diameters rate = the distances rate because of a geometrical reason that will push
us to conclude that the planet matter and orbital distance must be created together as a
complementary to each other…
Theoretically how it's possible to find a relationship between the planet diameter and his
orbital distance?
Or to answer the direct questions … How the matter is created? What's the space?
We know the matter is Energy (E= mc2
), so if the matter and distance are created together as
a complementary to each other..
That means the Space also is Energy…
Let's describe that in details…
The matter is created in motion and for that the matter needs a space to move in…
That means each part of matter is connected with a part of space and the general space is
produced by summation of all these parts…
Shortly, I claim that the planet matter and orbital distance both are created from the same
energy regardless their difference in forms.
Now the solar group description will be different… because the distances between the
planets no longer be a space separates the planets from each other but becomes an Energy
trajectory…. And we know the planet matter is Energy also.. that provides 2 results:
1- The Planet mass is NOT independent but dependent on other planets data
2- The solar group is one Trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on it.
The previous conclusions explain the reason of the solar group motions harmony…
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
Let's explain the result No. 2
The solar group is created from one Energy. This energy creates the planet matter
and his orbital distance as a complementary to each other. That means the planet data
is created to be suitable for the planet motion which guarantees the solar group
motions general harmony.
So the solar group is similar to a great river has many canals where these canals
created soils on their banks. So the river, canals and soils all of them are created from
the same water (matter and space are created from the same energy) which
guarantees the motions general harmony.
Also the solar group is similar to one machine or body and each planet is a member
in this body, where all members are connected together by the same blood (the same
energy)…. That makes the distances between the planets as trajectories of Energy
and the planets as a store points of Energy which makes the solar group as one body.
Let's discuss the result No. 1
one of the classical mechanics pillars is the mass definition, where the mass independency is
a doubtless fact! Now how we can explain this result that the mass is dependent on other
planets data?
In my previous paper "Solar Planet Gravity Equation" http://vixra.org/abs/1808.0012
I provided an Equation defines the planet gravity based on his diameter and mass rates with
the Earth… I have showed that the sun herself follows this same equation which supports
my claim that the solar group is one machine or one body, each planet is a member in it.
In fact this description "the solar group is one body" shows a great importance for the
planets integration and cooperation.
But if this description is correct, the planet mass can't be independent from the planets other
data to support the solar planets motions general harmony.
This paper tries to prove 2 claims
1- The space is Energy
2- The planet mass is NOT independent but dependent on other planets data.
The Study Main Objective
This paper supports the main idea that the solar group is one Trajectory of Energy, and each
planet is a point on this trajectory (or one body and each planet is a member in this body)
(For the question, why some planet follow the Equation d = r*1092
but others don't? that because of
Mars Immigration … review Mars Immigration Proves (Revised) http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0268)
2- Methodology
I use the same method in all my researches, The Planet Data Analysis…
Let's explain the idea here again
In Pythagoras triangle we found that a2
+ b2
= c2
, this rule we can conclude from the triangle
data if its dimensions are 3, 4 and 5… so the data may show the geometrical rules….similar
to that, I use the solar planets data analysis to conclude the main geometrical rules which
explain the solar planets origin and motion…
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
3- Earth Jupiter Distance 627 mkm
Data
Group No. I
Equation No. 1
The period 6939.75 seconds x c2
= 627 million km
Equation No. 2
The Value 6939.75 = 2666.7 x 2.6
Equation No. 3
940 mkm = 361 degrees x 2.6
Equation No. 4
1/2.6 mkm = 0.384 mkm
Group No. II
Equation No. 5
1898 x 0.33 = 627
Additional Equation No. c
102 x 5.97 = 609 (this value = 627 with error 2.8%)
Group No. III
Equation 7
d- 1898 km x 627km = 1.19 mkm
Equation 8
2666.7 x 1024
kg (solar group total Masses) = 2466.7 (rate 13.4) + 200 (rate 1)
DistanceJupiterEarthmkm627
DistanceanusJupiter Urmkm2088
MassSaturnkg10568
MassJupiterkg101898
24
24
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
3-1 The Discussion of Data Group No. I
In my try to understand the solar group geometry I found that, our Geometry Science is
insufficient to explain the solar group geometry where many new rules we need to learn to
see much better the picture…
Let's discuss one example in following..
We know the E=mc2
… where m = mass and E= Energy
Let's see our Equation …
Equation No.1
The period 6939.75 seconds x c2
= 627 million km …
How to understand this equation?
The light with c velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) needs 6939.75 seconds to cover a distance = 2088
mkm (Jupiter Uranus Distance)….
The light with c velocity also needs 2088 seconds to cover a distance = 627 mkm (Earth
Jupiter Distance)
So, if we suppose that the value 2088 mkm works as 2088 seconds for some geometrical
reason, that makes Equation No.1 consistent
But what does Equation No.1 tells us?
mc2
=E…! 6939.7 seconds is a period and NOT mass where 627 mkm is a distance and NOT
Energy (my hypothesis is ……. Distance = Energy)
How can we understand this Equation?
Let's see Equation No.2
Equation No.2
6939.75 = 2666.7 x 2.6
Let's define the previous values
- 6939.75 seconds are needed for light (c velocity) to cover Jupiter Uranus Distance
2088 mkm, and also 6939.75 days is Metonic Cycle…
- 2666.7 x 1024
kg = the Solar Planets Masses Total
Note Please
In all Masses Equations the factor 1024
is the main problem, till now I didn't solve it. so I
have to ignore it in my discussion till we reach to the general accurate description…
What does Equation No.2 tell us?
The Solar Planets Total Masses 2666.7 x 1024
kg can be seen as Metonic Cycle Period (or
light travel period ) Based On The Rate 2.6
The Masses total is seen as a period of time…. This idea isn't very strange because we know
mass = Energy and distance = Energy where I claimed that the time and distance values can
be equivalent in some solar planets data (this equivalence I claimed is found because of
high velocity motion – please review the time definition http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0523)
Shortly
The solar group is created from one energy, where the mass and distance both are created
from the same energy. So the energy is seen by us as masses or as distances but we know
that the time and distance values sometimes can be equivalent… that's why the Masses can
be seen as a period of time…
The masses value is seen as a period of time based on this rate 2.6 and what's this rate?
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
3-2 The Rate 2.6
I- Data …..Equation 3 and 4
3- 940 mkm = 361 degrees x 2.6 mkm
4- 1/2.6 mkm = 0.384 mkm ……Please Note also the following
a- 180 degrees = 177.4 degrees (Venus axial tilt) +2.6 degrees
b- 2.58 mkm (Earth daily velocity) x 6939.75 days (Metonic Cycle Period) = 18000
mkm (Uranus orbital Circumference)
II- Discussion
2.6 isn't just a number
This value defines Earth and moon interactive motions ..
Venus axial tilt needs 2.6 degrees to be 180 degrees …
And we know that …..1 degree = 1 mkm
So 2.6 degrees = 2.6 mkm ……….But
1/2.6 mkm = 0.384 mkm (Earth Moon distance in average orbit radius)
That tells us the moon defines his position from Earth based on the value 2.6 mkm
Equation No. 3
940 mkm (Earth orbital Circumference) = 361 degrees x 2.6 mkm
Equation No. 3 tells us that, if Earth revolution around the sun is divided by 361 degrees,
each 1 degree will equal 2.6 mkm … now we can see that the rate 2.6 expresses a
relationship between Earth and Venus, by this relationship the Moon is created (with
Support from Uranus!)…. That supports my claim "the moon belongs to Venus and Earth".
(For example the moon orbit regress 19 degrees yearly.. but 19 degrees = 2π *3.02 degrees,
where Venus daily motion =3.02 mkm)
Any way Equation No.3 tells us one more important information that, the Earth revolution
total degrees aren't 360 degrees but 361 degrees and why?
Because 19 degrees (the moon orbit regresses yearly) x 19 sidereal years = 361 degrees
(total degrees of Metonic Cycle)…
That means Earth rotates Metonic Cycle with her moon but this Cycle isn't seen in Earth
motion (unknown reason till now) but the Cycle is seen in the moon motion…!
Equation No. b
2.58 mkm (Earth daily velocity) x 6939.75 days (Metonic Cycle Period) = 18000 mkm
(Uranus orbital Circumference)
Shortly Earth moves during Metonic Cycle a distance = Uranus Orbital Circumference… in
my previous paper "Does The Moon move by Gravity?" http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0089 I
explained the strong relationship between the Moon and Uranus which tells us that Earth
rotates in fact Metonic Cycle.
The conclusion
Metonic Cycle effects on more than one planet motion (Moon, Earth and others), that
because… Metonic Cycle Period (in days) is born from the light travel period (in seconds)
from Jupiter to Uranus, and this period is the energy which causes Metonic Cycle from
which The solar planets Masses total is found depending on Earth-moon interactive motions
(the rate 2.6) …
Shortly…. E=mc2
this equation control our Equation 6939.75 seconds x c2
= 627 mkm
Where …6939.75 seconds expresses the solar planets total Masses
627 mkm expresses the resulted energy (distance = energy)
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
3-3 The Discussion of Data Group No. II
5- 1898 x 0.33 = 627
Also
c- 102 x 5.97 = 609 ( =627 with error 2.8%)
In my paper (solar Group Geometry Part I http://vixra.org/abs/1509.0126)
I have discussed the following fact:
Earth mass = 4 planets total masses (Mercury + Venus +Moon +Mars)
(in fact 4 planet masses = 99% of Earth Mass)
And I have asked why…? We may remember Anderson experiment which produced
electron and positron from Gamma rays (1.2 mev) (2 particles equal in mass and different in
charge)
Let's imagine that the 5 inner planets are produced from great Gamma rays, which produced
one great electron (Earth) and one great positron (Mercury+ Venus+ Moon + Mars)
What does mean the great electron?
Earth atom has a positive nucleus and negative charges move around
But what does mean the great positron?
The 4 inner planets atoms have a negative nucleus and positive charges move around…
Now the attraction between the 5 inner planets depend on the charges attraction and not on
the gravity…
Based on this old description let's try to understand the previous equations…
Equation No. 5
1898 x 1024
kg (Jupiter Mass) x 0.33 x 1024
kg (Mercury Mass)= 627 x 1048
kg
I ignore the factor 1024
…! And then the Equation will be
1898 x (Jupiter Mass) x 0.33 (Mercury Mass)= 627 (Earth Jupiter distance =627 mkm)
M1 x M2 = E
We know if electron collide with positron the result will be Energy….!
We have 2 masses collide with each other and the result is the same distance 627 mkm
I understand that the factor 1024
effects greatly in the equation explanation, but we may
consider that as units configuration.. for example 627 is million km and not km… that
means the factor 1024
may be consumed in unit configuration process.
So equation no.5 tells us that 2 solar planets masses collision produced this distance 627
mkm which we should consider as Energy…
I wish the reader sees that we use 2 physical equations (E=mc2
and E= m1m2) and we reach
to the same distance 627 mkm … I see some support for my claim spite of its difficulty..
Equation No. c
102 * 1024
kg (Neptune Mass) x 5.97 * 1024
kg (Earth Mass) = 609 ( =627 with error 2.8%)
Spite of the great error…
I see the same distance is produced…
I wish the reader sees with me that the planet data gives us one clear direction.
Yes I don't know the geometrical structure which is behind all this data but I can see easily
that this data is produced related to each other and not independent which supports the main
idea that the solar group is one trajectory of Energy…
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
3-3 The Discussion of Data Group No. III
Equation No. 7
d- 1898 km x 627km = 1.19 mkm
Equation No. 8
2666.7 x 1024
kg (solar group total Masses) = 2466.7 (rate 13.4) + 200 (rate 1)
Equation No. 7
We have studied the distance 2088 mkm (Jupiter Uranus Distance) frequently, and we
know that this distance is Metonic Cycle energy source where the light with c velocity
needs 6939.75 seconds to pass from Jupiter to Uranus…
And we have studied in Equation no.1 (627 mkm = 2088 seconds x c velocity), that means
both distances are important and related to each other strongly
But
What does Equation No. 7 tell us?
Equation 7 tells us that, Jupiter mass/ Saturn Mass = distance 2088 / distance 627… but we
know that the distances 2088 and 627 are related to each other…
Does that mean Jupiter Mass and Saturn Mass are related to each other?
Let's see Equation No. 8
Equation No. 8
2666.7 x 1024
kg (Solar Planets Total Masses) = 2466.7 (rate 13.4) + 200 (rate 1)
2666.7 x 1024
kg = (Solar Planets Total Masses)
2466.7 x 1024
kg = Jupiter Mass + Saturn Mass (rate 13.4)
200 x 1024
kg = rest planets masses total (rate 1)
What does that mean?
The solar planets masses total 2666.7 is divided into 2 parts by rate 13.4 to 1
The rate 13.4 produced the value (2466.7 x 1024
kg = Jupiter Mass + Saturn Mass)
and the rate 1 produced (200 x 1024
kg = the rest planets masses total)
Why this rate 13.4 is important?
Please review my paper Solar Group is one machine http://vixra.org/abs/1808.0081
Where I classified the solar planets data into 5 rates which are (1.392/1.9/3.66/13.4/179.56)
(A, A2
, A3
, A4
, A5
)
Which means, the masses are divided according to other data division rate…
Which proves that the mass isn't independent from the other planets data
To see the masses division more clear we need to discuss the solar planets masses
distribution, let's do it in following…..
DistanceJupiterEarthmkm627
DistanceanusJupiter Urmkm2088
MassSaturnkg10568
MassJupiterkg101898
24
24
DistanceJupiterEarthmkm627
DistanceanusJupiter Urmkm2088
MassSaturnkg10568
MassJupiterkg101898
24
24
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
4- Solar Group Masses Distribution
I- Data
Solar Planets Masses Total = 2666.7 x 1024
kg
This masses total is divided into 2 parts with rate 1: (3.66)2
= 200 :2467
2467 *1024
kg = Saturn Mass +Jupiter Mass
The rest planets mass = 200 *1024
kg
The rest planets mass = 200 *1024
kg is divided into 2 parts with rate 1: 1 (100 *1024
kg
Neptune Mass + 100 *1024
kg the rest planets masses total) (error 2%)
100 *1024
kg (the rest planets masses) is divided into 88 100 *1024
kg Uranus Mass
+12*1024
kg the rest planetsa masses total (error 1.4%)
12*1024
kg (The rest planets masses total) is divided into 2 parts with rate 1: 1 (6*1024
kg
Earth Mass) + 6*1024
kg (Total masses of Mercury + Venus+ Moon +Mars)
The rate 1:1
In Anderson experiment to produce electron and positron from Gamma rays (1.2 Mev) the
products were electron and positron whose masses are equal
i.e. The results rate was 1:1 …… So,
The value 200 is divided into 1:1 to produce Neptune Mass and the rest planets masses
(error 2%) …. Also
the value 12 is divided into 1: 1 to produce Earth mass and the 4 inner planets masses total
As we have discussed before, I noticed that Earth mass = 4 inner planet masses total and
suggested that Earth is the great electron and the 4 planets together are the great positron..
That means the rate 1:1 may produce electron and positron and that may be occurred also
with Neptune….
I want to say there's a resemblance in Mass distribution with Earth and Neptune… as we
have seen…
Let's see the following Equation
- Earth Circumference = 5 inner planets diameters total (with Earth) (no error)
- 2 x Neptune Circumference = 4 outer planets diameters total (without Neptune)
(error 1.8%)
I wish we see clearly the resemblances between Earth and Neptune in Mass and diameters..
This resemblance is found because
Earth Neptune distance x 2π2
= 86400 mkm (the soalr group main energy)..Iwish it's clear
that this data is produced based on a geometrical strcture which gurantees the motion
general harmony…
For more clear discussion please review
Solar Group Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
More Relationships
1st-
MassMercury
MassVenus
MassEarth
MassUranus
2nd- 1
totalmassesplanetsrest
MassNeptune
TotalMassesPlanets4
MassEarth
3rd-
MassPluto
MassNeptune
MassMoon
MassSatrun
(No Error)
4th-
MassMars
MassNeptune2
MassEarth
MassJupiter
(No Error)
5th-
MassVenus
MassUranus
MassMercury
MassEarth
(Error 1.5%)
6th-
MassMercury
MassSatrun
2
MassSatrun
MassSunThe
(Error 1.6%)
7th-
MassMercury
MassNeptune
MassEarth
MassJupiter
(Error 2.8%)
8th-
MassMoon
MassMars
TotalMassesPlanetsInner
MassNeptune
(Error 2.4%)
9th-
MassMars
MassSatrun
MassPLuto
TotalMassesPlanetsInner
(Error 2.4%)
10th-
MassPluto
MassMercury
MassNeptune
TotalMassesPlanetsOuter
(Error 2.5%)
The Discussion
I try to prove clearly that, the planet mass isn't independent from other planets masses and
data…
In fact it's impossible to be independent from other planets data because the planets motions
general harmony is performed by general harmony of the solar planets data….
If this harmony isn't performed, there's no way to produce the solar planets motions general
harmony…
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
5- The Energy E= 627 mkm
I- Data
9- E= 627 = 227.9 mkm x 2 x 1.3756 mkm (= 99% of the sun diameter 1.392 mkm)
10- Lunar umbra length = the sun diameter
Equation No.9
E= 627 mkm= 227.9 mkm x 2 x 1.3756 mkm (= 99% of the sun diameter 1.392 mkm)
Where
227.9 mkm = Mars orbital distance
1.392 mkm = the sun diameter
What does Equation No.9 tell us?
The sun diameter is created based on the distance 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter Distance) by
using Mars orbital distance 227.9 mkm… why?
I don't know…. But we know that Mars axial tilt 25.2 degrees is the constant in kepler 3rd
law table… let's remember it here again …
If we use Kepler 3rd
Law for the solar group data, we will find the following table
P2
* 25 = d3
(Kepler 3rd
Law)
- P : The Planet orbital period
- d : The Planet orbital distance
- 25.2 degrees : Mars Axial Tilt
The results are shown in the following table
Table No.1
Planet P2
* 25 = d3
Error
Mercury (88)2
*25 (57.9)3
0.2%
Venus (224.7)2
*25 (108.2)3
0.3%
Earth (366)2
*25 (149.6)3
0
Mars (687)2
*25 (227.9)3
0.3%
Jupiter (4331)2
*25 (778.6)3
1.4%
Saturn (10474)2
*25 (1433.5)3
1%
Uranus (30589)2
*25 (2872.5)3
1.3%
Neptune (59800)2
*25 (4495.1)3
1.5%
Pluto (90588)2
*25 (5870)3
1.4%
Comment:
The previous table I used many time in my papers, I have no explanation why Mars Axial
Tilt is the constant in Kepler 3rd
Law..
Some people told me I use wrong units to reach this result! I use million km for distance and
day for periods.. why these are wrong units?!
For Mars full discussion please read
Solar Planets Order disproves the Gravity Theory http://vixra.org/abs/1801.0114
Mars axial tilt is the constant in the table, and Mars data importance can be more clear by
revision of my paper
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim Against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
Equation No. 10
Lunar umbra length = The Sun Diameter
Lunar umbra is found in the distance between Earth and Mars…
Let's summarize the whole idea in following
The distance 627 mkm (Earth Jupiter distance) is produced as Energy from many different
equations…
The sun diameter is created based on this distance 627 mkm
Earth, Mars, Jupiter and Uranus with the moon are the main players in the sun production
process
That's why each planet has specific relationship with the sun
The sun diameter = Jupiter diameter xπ2
(error 1.4%)
The sun circles Earth to complete the cycle in 365.25 days (Earth orbital period)
63.7 degrees (sun declination) = 25.2 degrees Mars axial tilt x 2.5 degrees (Saturn orbital
inclination) (note Mars orbital circumference = Saturn orbital distance)
Lunar Umbra length = The Sun diameter (the umbra locates between Mars and Earth)
Author Other Papers
Does The Moon move by Gravity?
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0089
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim Against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
Metonic and Saros Cycles Harmony Reason
http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0559
The Solar Group Main Equation (Part 2)
http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0468
The Solar Group Main Equation
http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0186
The Solar Group Main Energy
http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0152
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All papers https://www.slideshare.net/search/slideshow?searchfrom=header&q=gerges+francis+papers+