The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt –15th
June 2021
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper provides (1-50) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion
analysis – The questions are:
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise direction?
2- Does aether wind exist?
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of
Relativity? Question Asked December 6, 2019.
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that
conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)?
Do Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable
distance in between them?
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? And what's the dimension of the
space?
13- Do you think that general relativity needs modifications or it is a perfect theory?
14- If the perigee of the moon incurs a larger than historic moon, is the moon getting
closer, if so, on what date is the eclipse bigger than solar ?
15- Who does work on the deviation of the Moon with a rectilinear trajectory during
its rotation around the Earth?
16- Is there any information about the age of the rocks on the Moon, Mars or any
planet? If there have got any information, how is it obtained?
17- Why The Moon Apogee Circumference =2.55 mkm?
18-Is there life outside the solar system?

I do this research
2nd
2
19- What are all the criteria for the occurrence of Lunar Eclipse?
20- I have a question: isn't Jupiter older than the Sun?
21- What else can you explore on the planet Mars and what questions do you get?
22- Physics: A Dark Age reigning for 91 Years?
23- What is the reason for the Saturn's hexagon?
24- Who can explain the collective IQ Blunder of the Big Bang Belief?
25- Is physics ill: The Big-Bang Blunder seen as an Informatics Problem
26- How many big-bang are there?
27- Gravity of Newton
28- Can the solar system be created based on one geometrical design?
28 (repeated)- (Pluto was The Mercury Moon and had migrated), to what extent this
statement is correct?
29- Why does Planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor orbital distance?
29 (repeated)- Why 40 percentage of the solar system distances be rated one another
by the rate (1.0725)?
30- Is anyone on this site doing original work regarding alternate theories of
cosmology?
31- Does the solar system motion geometry need to discover a new geometry science?
32-What would happen if the moon doesn't use Pythagorean rule in its orbital motion?
33- (The one second period of time can't be different from a planet to another), how to
prove this statement is mistaken?
34- Can the classical mechanics explain the solar system motion?
35- If we imagine, (the solar group work as a great clock) (How can it work)?
36- How does the moon influence life on Earth?
37- Which are the most accurate and recent estimates of the mass of Earth?
38- What is the orbit of the Pluto around the Sun?
39- Can plants feel the gravitational force of the moon?
40-What are the fundamental quantities that initially dictate the formation and
evolution of a terrestrial planet or moon?
41- Is it possible that Earth's orbit changes?
42- Did an asteroid hit the Earth 12,800 years ago?
43- What are the consequences for the planet Mars, if the impact as extreme as the
one produced in the Hellas basin occurred?
44- Do any set of exoplanets around any star follow the Titius-Bode law?
45- Does the Moon assist in driving Earth's tectonic plates?
46- Can a planet or star exist without rotating on its axis?
47- How the asteroid belt be created?
48- Why Pluto orbital inclination = 17.2 degrees
49- Why should The solar Planets Data Analysis be considered a basic tool in the
solar system motion research?
50- How does a solar planet define its motion velocity?
Please scan the figure (ORCID)

I do this research
2nd
3
Question No. (1)
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise
direction?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_do_Venus_and_Uranus_rotate_on_their_axes_or_spin_in_a_clockwise_direction
Dr. Nancy Ann Watanabe (1)
Best Greetings
(Data No. 1)
12104 km = Venus Diameter
61920 seconds = Uranus Day Period (=17.2 hours)
90560 DAYS = Pluto Day Period
Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 seconds a distance = 423640 km
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during its day period (17.2 h) a distance =421056 km
Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 90560 SECONDS a distance =425632 km
These 3 distances are different with (1%) at max, so they are almost equal, Why?
means,
35 km/s x 12104 s = 6.8 km/s x 61920 s = 4.7 km/s x 90560 s (Why?)
(Data No. 2)
61920 seconds = 12104 seconds x 5.1
35 km/s = 6.8 km/s x 5.1
24.1 km/s (Mars v.) = 4.7 km/s (Pluto v.) x 5.1
Why?
(Data No. 3)
10747 days (Saturn orbital period) = 257928 hours = 10.7 h (Saturn day period) x 2 x
12053
But
1433 mkm (Saturn orbital distance) = (12053 km x π)2
(The difference between Venus diameter 12104 km and 12053 km is 0.4%)
(Data No. 4)
Saturn diameter 120536 km = π2
x 12104 km (error 1%)
(Data No. 5)
Saturn day period =10.7 hours = 38520 seconds
Saturn diameter 120536 km = π x 38368 km
Venus Circumference = 38025 km
(If 1 km = 1 second, the difference between the previous 3 values be 1% at max)
How to understand this data?
Best regards
Please read my paper

I do this research
2nd
4
The Solar System Motion Analysis
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352151822_The_Solar_System_Motion_Analysis
https://www.academia.edu/s/e8f12035d7
https://www.academia.edu/49131498/The_Solar_System_Motion_Analysis
https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv/file/818651551358
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-solar-system-motion-analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GergesTawdrous1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Researchgate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerges-Tawdrous
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Also
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis?utm_campaign=profiletracking&utm_medium=sssite&utm_source
=ssslideview

I do this research
2nd
5
Question No. (2)
Does aether wind exist?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does_aether_wind_exist
Dr. Edward Wu
Best Greetings
Can The Motion Be Transported Among The Solar Planets?
The planets data proves that, the motion is transported among the solar planets.
The motion transportation can be replaced in place of the gravity concept, because it
does the same task and causes the motion at distance.
This conclusion still faces 2 questions which are:
(1)
Do we have an obligation to attribute mechanical features for the space? NO because
no confirmation that the motion is transported mechanically
(2)
By what mechanism the motion be transported among the solar planets?
The mechanism needs to be discovered – But the data proves the motion
transportation.
THE DATA
- Mars Orbital Period = 687 days
- Jupiter Orbital Period = 687 days x 2π = 4331 days
- Also 4331 days x π = 13606 days
- And 13606 days x π = 42745 days
Data Group No. (1)
- Mars moves during 687 d. a distance= 1433 mkm= Mars Orbital Circumference
- Mars moves during 4331d. a distance= 9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference
- Mars moves during 13606 d a distance= 28255 mkm= Neptune orbital circumference
Data Group No. (2)
- Mercury moves during 687 d. a distance= 2815 mkm= Mercury Uranus Distance
- Mercury moves during 4331d. a distance= 2815 mkm= Mercury Uranus Circum.
Data Group No. (3)
- Jupiter moves during 687 d. a distance= 778.6 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Distance
- Jupiter moves during 4331 d. a distance= 4900 mkm= Jupiter Orbital Circum.
- Jupiter moves during 13606 d. a distance= 15394 mkm.
Data Group No. (4)
- Saturn moves during 687 d. a distance = 576 mkm
- Where
- 1433.5 mkm (Saturn Orbital Distance) = 576 mkm x 2.5

I do this research
2nd
6
- 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference) = 3630 mkm x 2.5
And (2.5 degrees = Saturn Orbital Inclination)
DISCUSSION
The Data proves the motion transportation because Planet Motion data is used by
other planets motions data, and the used data is not a single data by a system of data.
So how this data which be used for one planet motion be used again for another planet
motion? the data must be transported with the transporting motion.
Also
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis?utm_campaign=profiletracking&utm_medium=sssite&utm_source
=ssslideview

I do this research
2nd
7
Question No. (3)
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity?
Question Asked December 6, 2019.
Dr,Nancy Ann Watanabe (2)
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does_aether_wind_exist
Best Greetings
One basic question in the relativity theory is the Meaning of Lorentz Transformations.
Let's use Lorentz length Contraction equation as example for the other 2 equations.
Particle length be contracted when this particle moves by high velocity motion.
Let's ask,
Does Particle own length be contracted (really) with high velocity motion?
Some physics books tell yes (particle own length be contracted really) and other
physics books tell that (the length contraction is illusions of measurements)
I can't accept the illusions of measurements claim, because
(1) The physics is the science of measurements. What's measured is the fact
(2) If the particle data be measured (correctly) when this particle moves by velocity
(equal) my motion velocity and the same particle data will suffer from illusions of
measurements when moves by high velocity relative to my motion velocity. That
means, I'm the Universe Reference Point.
As a result we have to accept that, the particle own length be contracted by high
velocity motion. (Why?)
This question answer should belong to another question (How The Matter Is
Created?)
That means,
Lorentz Transformations tries to deepen our understanding to answer how the matter
is created? but this try is limited after Lorentz and couldn't find the answer
Best regards
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351855225_Did_Lorentz_Ask_How_The_matter_is_Created
https://www.academia.edu/48987206/Did_Lorentz_Ask_How_The_matter_is_Created_
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/did-lorentz-ask-how-the-matter-is-created

I do this research
2nd
8
Also
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis?utm_campaign=profiletracking&utm_medium=sssite&ut
m_source=ssslideview

I do this research
2nd
9
Question No. (4)
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that
conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Which_is_the_most_convincing_physical_experiment_Not_Thou
ght_Experiment_that_conclusively_validates_Einsteins_Special_Theory_of_Relativity
Dr. Gurcharn Singh Sandhu
(My Answer)
Best Greetings
I thank you very much for your interest in my answer.
I support the claim that, (Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon) is a real
contraction occurred for Particle Own Length when this particle moves by high
velocity motion. and I refuse the claim that (the contraction is produced by illusions
of measurements)
I hope to avoid the experimental details for particle contracted length measurement.
Because we deal with results are proved empirically..
The point is that, the illusions of measurements claim disproves Lorentz
Transformations sufficiency because it tells the equations measure illusions and not
facts.
Lorentz was a splendid scientist in his work, and he was very near to answer the
question (how the matter is created?)
The point is that, (almost) the matter is created out of light and because of that the
high velocity motion effects on Matter Dimensions Definition.
The illusions of measurements claim also disproves the physics experiment as a
method of research because we refuse empirical proves without any theoretical
explanation…
Also the illusions of measurements supposes me The Universe Reference Point.
I want to say, Lorentz Transformations are very unique part of Truth. They should be
a start point to search after and answer the question how the matter is created.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351855225_Did_Lorentz_Ask_How_The_matter_is_Creat
ed

I do this research
2nd
10
Also

I do this research
2nd
11
Question No. (5)
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
Best Greetings
https://www.researchgate.net/post/The_advance_of_Mercury_perihelion_is_achieved_in_Newtonia
n_gravity
Christian Corda
In Comparison between the solar planets data and the gravitation equation.
We find that,
(1) Jupiter the greatest Mass is found in order no. (5) from the sun (why not the
nearest planet?)
(2) the 3 planets (Mercury – Venus – Earth) order shows that greater mass (or
diameter) needs greater orbital distance which contradicts the gravitation equation
concept
(3) Uranus (less Mass) be more near to the sun than Neptune (greater mass)
(4) only Jupiter and Saturn data follows the gravitation equation if there are no other
planets in the solar system.
I suppose the motion is transported among the solar planets and this motion
transportation causes the planet motion and can be used as a concept in place of the
mass gravity concept to cause the planet motion .
Also https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis?utm_campaign=profiletracking&utm_medium=sssite&utm_source=ssslideview

I do this research
2nd
12
Question No. (6)
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_Gravity_a_Push_or_a_Pull
Dr.Shehab Khan
Best Greetings
Can The Motion Be Transported Among The Solar Planets?
The planets data proves that, the motion is transported among the solar planets.
The motion transportation can be replaced in place of the gravity concept, because it
does the same task and causes the motion at distance.
This conclusion still faces 2 questions which are:
(1)
Do we have an obligation to attribute mechanical features for the space? NO because
no confirmation that the motion is transported mechanically
(2)
By what mechanism the motion be transported among the solar planets?
The mechanism needs to be discovered – But the data proves the motion
transportation.
THE DATA
- And 13606 days x π = 42745 days
Data Group No. (1)
Data Group No. (2)
Data Group No. (3)
Data Group No. (4)
- Where

I do this research
2nd
13
DISCUSSION
The Data proves the motion transportation because Planet Motion data is used by
other planets motions data, and the used data is not a single data by a system of data.
So how this data which be used for one planet motion be used again for another planet
motion? the data must be transported with the transporting motion.
Also

I do this research
2nd
14
Question No. (7)
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_our_solar_system_exemplary_for_all_other_planetary
_systems2
Hans-G. Hildebrandt
Best Greetings
Can the solar system move one unified motion?
i.e.
Can the solar planets motions be unified together in one general unified motion?
which be similar to (A Train Carriages Motion)
The solar planets motions data proves that, the planets motions produce one unified
motion.
This vision disproves the classical description tells, the solar planets are separated
rigid bodies each is independent in its motion from the other.
Also

I do this research
2nd
15
Question No. (8)
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Life_on_Mars_Open_discussion
Ashraf M. T. Elewa
Best Greetings
I suppose that, Mars has life in ancient times before Mars Migration.
Let's explain Mars Migration Theory In following:
- Mars was the second planet next to Mercury. Mars ancient orbital distance was 84
mkm
- In that time Mars had life
- Then
- Some great earthquake be occurred in the solar system and this earthquake pushed
Mars out of its ancient orbital distance to move to its current orbital distance point
(227.9 mkm)
- The Theory Proves.
- Mars had move from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to it current one (227.9
mkm) and through this displacement, Mars had collided with Venus (at first) and
then with Earth (at second).
- From these collisions debris, Earth created its on Moon.
- Mars itself collided with Earth to create the moon and not any other planet. Giant-
impact hypothesis tells this story perfectly as the moon creation story but Giant-
impact hypothesis supposes that another ancient planet in mars size did this
collision. In fact mars itself did that
- Mars Migration Theory answers the questions lest by Giant- impact hypothesis
which are
(1) why Venus couldn't create its own moon spite it had suffered from a collision
similar to earth? Because Mars had moved its displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9
mkm), mars has collided with Venus through this displacement, but Mars had pushed
all collisions debris with it in its motion direction, because of that Venus had found no
debris around to create its own moon. But Earth gravity is greater than Venus and the
debris lost some of their motion momentum, for that reason Earth could catch some of
them and create its own moon.
(2) The lunar magma ocean origin is Venus, because the Earth moon is consisted of
the 3 planets rocks (Venus – Earth and Mars)

I do this research
2nd
16
(3) The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%), Because The rate (13%) is a middle
between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
(4) Mars could create its own 2 moon from the debris which followed it in its motion.
(5) the rest debris be attracted by Jupiter gravity and created the asteroid belt.
Mars Migration Theory depends on different proves among which the planets order,
where the 3 planets order (Mercury – Venus – Earth) tells that, Mars was the second
planet after Mercury.
(Preprint No. 1) Mars Migration Theory
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351886032_Preprint_No_1_Mars_Migration_Theory
https://www.academia.edu/49051037/_Preprint_No_1_Mars_Migration_Theory
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/preprint-no-1-mars-migration-theory
Also

I do this research
2nd
17
Question No. (9)
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/What-do-you-think-about-wave-particle-duality
Alexandre Georges
Best Greeting
How to explain The Wave – Particle Duality? Let's try to answer in following:
- If 2 light beams travel by (light velocity C) relative to us. And we are the observer for
them and move by low velocity motion.
- We see the 2 light beams as light beams because there's a difference in velocities
between their motions and our motion = ( C velocity).
- How does each light beam see the other light beam? Where there's no difference in
velocity between them? Each light beam will see the other as matter (Particle)
- This is my case with my computer, we together move with the same velocity and no
difference in velocity is found between our motions and because of that we see each
other as matters (particles)
- Now
- Suppose the human mind uses light velocity in the realization and thinking process
- So, we see any (object) moves by light velocity as matter (particle) because our mind
thinking velocity = this object motion velocity
- And any object moves by low velocity we will see it as a light beam because there's a
difference in velocity between the 2 motions = (C velocity)
- But
- Particle changes its velocity. When this particle moves by light velocity we see it as
matter (particle) but when this same particle moves by low velocity motion we see it as a
wave.
Notice
- This idea answers (how can the observer effect on the observation results?)
- Because the observer effects by the light beam energy which is used in the observer
thinking process. That means, the observer has some tool to effect (really) on the
observation results, the observer has a light beam by which he can effect on the
observation process. (Notice the solar cell is a machine its working concept depends on a
light beam came from the sun. the observer thinking process can provide this same effect

I do this research
2nd
18
by his light beam- I try to show how powerful the tool which has the observer to effect
on the observation results).
The Human Mind Realization Process Uses The Light Velocity
http://vixra.org/abs/1905.0489
https://www.academia.edu/s/965f9132c7/human-mind-realization-process-uses-the-light-velocity
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/human-mind-realization-process-uses-the-light-velocity
Also
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis?utm_campaign=profiletracking&utm_medium=sss
ite&utm_source=ssslideview

I do this research
2nd
19
Question No. (10)
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)? Do
Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is-there-somebody-who-believes-in-the-theory-of-
Everett-multitude-of-universes-Do-Einsteins-Field-Equations-allow-multiple-universes
Sofia D. Wechsler
Best Greeting
Let's try to find a solid approach for multitude universes idea in following
Let's ask (How the matter is created?),
A hypothesis:
(The matter is created out of light)
The hypothesis explanation :
- The matter is produced out of light but the matter doesn't separate from its light beam
parent. On the contrary, the matter is born from light beam, but still the born matter
connects with the light beam and both move together.
- But
- The matter and light move with different rates of time, for example, one second of light
motion be = one solar day of a planet motion. based on this idea, the light beam clock
moves one second and during it one solar day be spent on the planet. The motions are
one by different rates of time
- That means
- Planet motion is done based on light motion. but we see the planet motion, where the
light motion (unseen) but still fact as much as the planet motion itself
- Based on this idea
- The (matter) universe depends on (light motion) universe and that shows multitude
universes
- This idea explains why light motion feature be discovered in planet motion.
Please read my papers
Is There A Parallel Universe?
https://www.academia.edu/43150627/Is_There_A_Parallel_Universe
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/is-there-a-parallel-universe
Light Motion Features Are Discovered in Planet Motion
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/light-motion-features-are-discovered-in-planet-
motion

I do this research
2nd
20
Also

I do this research
2nd
21
Question No. (11)
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance
in between them?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Do_the_Gravitational_force_in_between_two_objects_depends_on_the_m
ost_probable_distance_in_between_them
Hussainsha Syed
Best greetings
Let's analyze the solar planets order to find answer for your question…
- Jupiter the greatest mass isn't the most near planet to the sun, but occupies the order no.
(5)
- The gravitation equation tells that (more mass needs shorter distance)
- But
- The 3 planets (Mercury – Venus – Earth) shows that, greater mass (or diameter) needs
greater orbital distance (which contradicts the gravitation equation concept)
- Uranus (less Mass) is more near to the sun than Neptune(greater Mass)
- Only Jupiter and Saturn data be followed the gravitation equation if there are no other
planets in the solar system
- From this data we conclude that, the distance between the sun and the planets were a
function in the planets diameters
- Although the planets current order shows that each planet orbital distance depend on its
previous neighbor orbital distance
- My equation defines the planet orbital distance accurately, let's insert it here
Gerges Equation For Planet Orbital Distance
d2
= 4do (d – do)
Where
d= A Planet Orbital Distance do= The Previous Planet Orbital Distance
(Earth depends on Mercury), (Mars depends on Venus) and (Pluto depends on Uranus)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/planet-orbital-distance-equation
or
https://www.academia.edu/45627166/Planet_Orbital_Distance_Equation

I do this research
2nd
22
Also

I do this research
2nd
23
Question No. (12)
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? and what's the dimension of the space?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Whats-underline-the-Lorentz-transformation-and-whats-
the-dimension-of-the-space
Yucong Cai
Best Greetings
One basic question in the relativity theory is the Meaning of Lorentz Transformations.
Let's use Lorentz length Contraction equation as example for the other 2 equations.
Particle length be contracted when this particle moves by high velocity motion.
Let's ask,
Does Particle own length be contracted (really) with high velocity motion?
Some physics books tell yes (particle own length be contracted really) and other physics
books tell that (the length contraction is illusions of measurements)
I can't accept the illusions of measurements claim, because
(1) The physics is the science of measurements. What's measured is the fact
(2) If the particle data be measured (correctly) when this particle moves by velocity (equal)
my motion velocity and the same particle data will suffer from illusions of measurements
when moves by high velocity relative to my motion velocity. That means, I'm the Universe
Reference Point.
As a result we have to accept that, the particle own length be contracted by high velocity
motion. (Why?)
This question answer should belong to another question (How The Matter Is Created?)
That means,
Lorentz Transformations tries to deepen our understanding to answer how the matter is
created? but this try is limited after Lorentz and couldn't find the answer
Best regards
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351855225_Did_Lorentz_Ask_How_The_matter_i
s_Created

I do this research
2nd
24
Also

I do this research
2nd
25
Question No. (13)
13- Do you think that general relativity needs modifications or it is a perfect theory?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Do_you_think_that_general_relativity_needs_modifications_or_it
_is_a_perfect_theory
Sadeem Fadhil
Best Greetings
One question is still left after the general and special relativity is
(What's happened on the next day after the event?)
In the Lorentz Transformations meaning, let's use the length contraction as an example
The equation tells that, particle length will be contracted by high velocity motion.
We should ask why? what's the relationship between particle length and its motion
velocity…
But
The main question should be (what's happening after?)
Because the relativistic effects are done in our world, so how the cooperation will be
occurred between (relativistic system and non relativistic system?)
The particle whose length is contracted, how will cooperate with other (non-relativistic
effected) particles?
The theory left us with the event and didn't complete the system of motions….
One more notice I should refer to,
The length contraction equation is used for (distances) and for (particle lengths) as if the
(distances) are equivalent to (particles lengths)!
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351855225_Did_Lorentz_Ask_How_The_matter_is_Creat
ed

I do this research
2nd
26
Also

I do this research
2nd
27
Question No. (14)
14- If the perigee of the moon incurs a larger than historic moon, is the moon getting closer,
if so, on what date is the eclipse bigger than solar ?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/If-the-perigee-of-the-moon-incurs-a-larger-than-historic-moon-is-the-
moon-getting-closer-if-so-on-what-date-is-the-eclipse-bigger-than-solar
Jack Don McLovin
Best Regards
(1) Why Do We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc?
Because
(the sun diameter / the moon diameter) = (Earth orbital distance / Earth moon distance)
Then
(2) Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Let's add some more data
The moon circumference x Jupiter circumference = Jupiter orbital circumference
And
(Uranus diameter / the moon diameter) = (Uranus mass/ Earth mass) = (98.6 deg/6.7 deg)
The conclusion:
The main description is mistaken…
The moon is indeed created by planets collisions but the moon diameter is created based on
geometrical calculations.
Because
The solar system has one geometrical design and this geometrical design defines each planet
data to be in harmony with all planets motions data to guarantee the motions general
harmony.
means, the solar planets move as a train carriages, each planet is similar to a carriage.
Based on this vision
The solar system move one unified motion. This vision disproves the classical vision tells
the solar planets are separated rigid bodies independent in their motions from each other.
The solar planets are carriages in one train and because of that the planets data be created
complementary with each other.

I do this research
2nd
28
Also

I do this research
2nd
29
Question No. (15)
15-Who does work on the deviation of the Moon with a rectilinear trajectory during its
rotation around the Earth?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Who-does-work-on-the-deviation-of-the-Moon-with-a-
rectilinear-trajectory-during-its-rotation-around-the-Earth
Valeriy Pakulin
Best Greetings
The moon uses Pythagorean rule in its orbital motion. because of that the moon orbital
motion equation depends on this concept.
The moon orbital motion equation is inserted in following:
θ(1) = θ(0) + 1.7 degrees
Let's explain the equation concept:
- The moon daily displacement =88000 km and the displacements total during (29.53
days) be = 2598693 km.
- This distance 2598693 km should be = the moon apogee circumference = 2π x 413600
km
- i.e.
- The moon apogee radius should be =413600 km
- But
- The moon real apogee radius =406000 km! how can the moon decrease its apogee
radius?
- Also
- Because the moon displacements total is a very long distance(2598693 km), the moon
has to revolve around The Earth through its apogee orbit only (r=413600 km) along
month. And the moon can't revolve around Earth through any more near orbit than its
apogee orbit (r= 413600 km)
- So, how can the moon revolve around the Earth through near orbits as perigee orbit
(r=363000 km)?
- The intelligent moon uses Pythagorean rule in its orbital motion.
- The moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement and the moon orbit horizontal
level, by that the real displacement (L) through the moon orbit be shorter than 88000 km
because it be (L =88000 km cos θ)
- By using Pythagorean rule the moon creates real displacement shorter that (88000km)
and by that, the moon be able to revolve around Earth through more near orbit to the
Earth as perigee orbit (r= 363000km).
- Also by this intelligent technique the moon could decrease its apogee radius to be 406000
km in place of 413600 km
- The angle (θ) controls the moon motion features because with shorter real displacement
(L) the moon can revolve around Earth through more near orbits, but with longer

I do this research
2nd
30
displacement the moon displacements total be so long and needs wide orbit to move
through which forces the moon to revolve around Earth through more far orbits as
apogee orbit (r= 406000km)
- Because of that, the angle (θ) forms the basic part in the moon orbital motion equation.
- Please read my paper to see the equation applications and tests.
(Preprint No. 2) The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351885892_Preprint_No_2_The_Moon_Orbital_Motion_Equation
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/preprint-no-2-the-moon-orbital-motion-equation
https://www.academia.edu/49051029/_Preprint_No_2_The_Moon_Orbital_Motion_Equation
(2nd
Answer)
Valeriy Pakulin
Best Greetings,
Thank you very much for your interest
I understand that it's some how astonished to find the moon uses Pythagorean rule in its
motion
And
The geometry is inherited science, its development and extensions don't effect negatively on
its roots.
Pythagorean rule almost be known because of the moon orbital motion.
The moon orbit geometrical structure shows that, the moon motion basic points depends on
Pythagorean rule
Because of that,
(363000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (373000 km)2
And
(373000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (384000 km)2
And
(384000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (406000 km)2
Where
363000 km = the moon perigee radius
373 000 km = the moon total solar eclipse radius
384000 km = the moon orbital distance
406000 km = the moon apogee radius
(the calculations have error 1% with apogee radius)
This data shows how the moon orbital motion depends (really) on Pythagorean rule
That creates one more result, where
The moon using for Pythagorean rule causes the moon orbital to be created in a triangle form

I do this research
2nd
31
Notice
The moon orbit is a very complex orbit of motion. that because this orbit is created in a
triangle form and because its created by effect of 3 forces (Earth, Jupiter and Uranus)
Let’s refer to one data of the moon orbit.
The moon orbit perigee radius =363000 km = the outer planets diameters total
The moon orbit apogee radius =406000 km = the solar planets diameters total
The distance from perigee to apogee = 4300 km
But
Through this distance (43000km) the moon moves from perigee to apogee, so the distance
without the moon itself (43000 km – 3475 km the moon diameter = 39525 km)
Earth Circumference =40080 km = the 5 inner plants diameters total (different from 39525
km with 1.3%)
Please read my paper.
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (II)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351858672_The_Moon_Orbital_Motion_Geometry_II
https://www.academia.edu/45181646/The_Moon_Orbital_Motion_Geometry_II_
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-orbital-motion-geometry-ii
Also

I do this research
2nd
32
Question No. (16)
16 -Is there any information about the age of the rocks on the Moon, Mars or any planet? If
there have got any information, how is it obtained?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is-there-any-information-about-the-age-of-the-rocks-on-the-Moon-Mars-or-any-planet-If-there-
have-got-any-information-how-is-it-obtained
Gokhan Cevik
Best Greetings
Mars Migration Theory can help to explain the historical order of the planets creation.
Let's explain Mars Migration Theory In following:
- Mars was the second planet next to Mercury. Mars ancient orbital distance was 84 mkm
- Then
- Some great earthquake be occurred in the solar system and this earthquake pushed Mars
out of its ancient orbital distance to move to its current orbital distance point (227.9
mkm)
- Mars had move from its original orbital distance (84 mkm) to it current one (227.9 mkm)
and through this displacement, Mars had collided with Venus (at first) and then with
Earth (at second).
- Mars itself collided with Earth to create the moon and not any other planet. Giant-impact
hypothesis tells this story perfectly as the moon creation story but Giant-impact
hypothesis supposes that another ancient planet in mars size did this collision. In fact
mars itself did that
- Mars Migration Theory answers the questions lest by Giant- impact hypothesis which are
(1) why Venus couldn't create its own moon spite it had suffered from a collision similar to
earth? Because Mars had moved its displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), mars has
collided with Venus through this displacement, but Mars had pushed all collisions debris
with it in its motion direction, because of that Venus had found no debris around to create its
own moon. But Earth gravity is greater than Venus and the debris lost some of their motion
momentum, for that reason Earth could catch some of them and create its own moon.
(2) The lunar magma ocean origin is Venus, because the Earth moon is consisted of the 3
planets rocks (Venus – Earth and Mars)
(3) The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%), Because The rate (13%) is a middle between
Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).

I do this research
2nd
33
Mars Migration Theory depends on different proves among which the planets order, where
the 3 planets order (Mercury – Venus – Earth) tells that, Mars was the second planet after
Mercury.
Also

I do this research
2nd
34
Question No. (17)
17- Why The Moon Apogee Circumference =2.55 mkm?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_The_Moon_Apogee_Circumference_255_mkm
Best Greetings
- Thank you very much for your answers for my question
- This question interests for the moon orbital motion using of Pythagorean rule.
- This is one important fact be discovered by planets motions data analysis
- The moon apogee radius couldn't be 406000 km except by using Pythagorean rule, as
explained in the question…
- The moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement direction and its orbital
horizontal level. by that, the moon real displacement (L) be less that 88000 km, because
it be (L= 88000 km cos θ)
- By that the displacements total during (29.53 days) be less than (2598693 km) as
explained in the question….
- The angle (θ) should get our attention for its specific effect…let's summarize the idea in
following:
- The angle (θ) changes the real displacement (L = 88000 cos (θ)), through the moon orbit..
- We know that, when the real displacement (L) be shorter the moon can move through
near orbits to Earth and by that the moon can be near or at Perigee radius (0.363 mkm)
- When the real displacement (L) be greater the moon has to move through orbits far from
Earth and by that the moon can be near or at apogee orbit (r=0.406 mkm)
- That means, the angle (θ) changes the real displacement (L) and also changes the
distance between the moon to perigee or to apogee, shortly, the angle (θ) defines the
moon position (as a ship) between 2 river banks….
- The angle (θ) defines the moon orbital motion basic features and for that the equation be
(θ1= θ0 + 1.7 degrees), where (1.7 deg) is one day motion angle
Please read my paper.

I do this research
2nd
35
Also

I do this research
2nd
36
Question No. (18)
18- Is there life outside the solar system?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is-there-life-outside-the-solar-system
Dariusz Prokopowicz
(1st
answer)
Best Greetings
Also we may ask if the life was found on other solar planets during the history.
The point is that, we have data about the planets motions but no enough discussions be
performed concerning the planets motions
Where the planets motions can help us to know if a great change is occurred for the planets
during the history
Shortly
The solar planets almost had life (on all of them) before Mars Migration.
The planets migration changed the situation and prevented the life on all planets except
earth.
I want to say that,
This conclusion we can get by the solar planets motions analysis, that means, we don’t need
so far source of knowledge, on the contrary, we can conclude what's happened by analysis of
the solar plants motions data.
Let's use one example for better explanation
Example No. 1
Giant-impact hypothesis tells, ancient planet in Mars size had collided with Earth and caused
to create the Earth moon (the Giant- impact hypothesis called this ancient planet (Theia)).
The solar planets motions data analysis proved that, Mars itself did this collision and caused
the Earth Moon Creation. This is proved by Mars Migration Theory, let's summarize it in
following
Mars Migration Theory:
- Then
mkm)
Earth (at second).

I do this research
2nd
37
mars itself did that
(1) why Venus couldn't create its own moon spite it had suffered from a collision similar to
earth? Because Mars had moved its displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), mars has
own moon. But Earth gravity is greater than Venus and the debris lost some of their motion
momentum, for that reason Earth could catch some of them and create its own moon.
Mercury.

I do this research
2nd
38
Also

I do this research
2nd
39
Question No. (19)
19- What are all the criteria for the occurrence of Lunar Eclipse?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/What-are-all-the-criteria-for-the-occurrence-of-Lunar-
Eclipse
Raja M L Maravan Lakshmana Reddi
Best Greetings
Let's ask, why the solar eclipse is done? Because
We see the sun disc = the moon disc
Why?
Because
(The sun diameter / the moon diameter) = (Earth orbital distance/ earth moon distance)
i.e.
The Diameters Rate = The Distances Rate! Why?
Why the matter dimensions are created in proportionality with space (dimensions)?
It try to show that, the eclipse is phenomenon created geometrically
But
We don't know how the matter is created? neither know if the space has any geometrical
form or dimensions
So,
We simply don't see the geometrical structure behind the machine?
The lunar eclipse basic point is the moon orbital inclination, why it's =5.1 degrees?
I try to say that,
A complex geometrical machine is found behind the eclipse phenomenon but we see it so
simply because we don't know the used geometrical rules and basically because we don't
know how the matter is created? (or why the moon diameter be =3475 km)?
I have many papers discuss the solar system geometrical design,

I do this research
2nd
40
Also

I do this research
2nd
41
Question No. (20)
20- I have a question: isn't Jupiter older than the Sun?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/I-have-a-question-isnt-Jupiter-older-than-the-Sun
Dr. Nancy Ann Watanabe (3)
Best Greetings
Based on the solar planets data analysis, the sun is created after all solar planets.
Jupiter is very ancient planet
Saturn was the last planet be created and Saturn is created after the Earth Moon Creation.
Mars migration Theory gives some details about the planets historical creation order,
Mars migration Theory:
- In that time Mars had a life
- Then
mkm)
Earth (at second).
Mars itself did that
(1) Why Venus couldn't create its own moon spite it had suffered from a collision similar to
earth? Because Mars had moved its displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), Mars has
own moon. But Earth gravity is greater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their motion
momentum, for that reason Earth could catch some of them and created its own moon.

I do this research
2nd
42
Mercury.
Notice
The sun rays energy is produced by the solar planets motions energies total and not by any
nuclear interaction.
Also

I do this research
2nd
43
Question No. (21)
21- What else can you explore on the planet Mars and what questions do you get?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_else_can_you_explore_on_the_planet_Mars_and_what_questions_d
o_you_get
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Best Greetings
Mars Data provides incredible puzzles..
We need some help in explanation how Mars motion data be defined. Let's provide some of
this data in following
THE DATA
- And 13606 days x π = 42745 days
Data Group No. (1)
Data Group No. (2)
Data Group No. (3)
Data Group No. (4)
- Where
DISCUSSION
Can this data proves the motion is transported among the solar planets?
Notice (1)
687 days (Mars orbital period) = 365.25 days (Earth orbital period) x 1.9 = 27.3 days x 25.2
Where

I do this research
2nd
44
27.3 days = The Moon Orbital Period
25.2 deg = Mars Axial Tilt
1.9 deg = Mars Orbital Inclination
Notice (2)
13.17 deg (the moon motion daily degrees) x 1.9 deg = 25.2 degrees
How to understand the previous data
Also

I do this research
2nd
45
Question No. (22)
22- Physics: A Dark Age reigning for 91 Years?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Physics_A_Dark_Age_reigning_for_91_Years
Otto E. Rossler
Best Greetings
The solar planets data analysis suggests that,
(The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
I provide the data in following because it shows clearly that, the motion is indeed transported
among the solar planets.
Please help and comment on data if you wish – because – the motion transportation concept
will change the solar system current description.
THE DATA
- And 13606 days x π = 42745 days
Data Group No. (1)
Data Group No. (2)
Data Group No. (3)
Data Group No. (4)
- Where
DISCUSSION
The Data proves the motion transportation because Planet Motion data is used by other
planets motions data, and the used data is not a single data by a system of data. So how this
data which be used for one planet motion be used again for another planet motion? the data
must be transported with the transporting motion.

I do this research
2nd
46
Also

I do this research
2nd
47
Question No. (23)
23- What is the reason for the Saturn's hexagon?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/What-is-the-reason-for-the-Saturns-hexagon
Jayaram as.
Best Greetings
Saturn motion data is so puzzled one, that may add more questions to the provided one.
Let's insert Saturn motion data analysis in following:
- Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during its day period (10.7 hours) a distance = 373644 km =
98.67% of Saturn Circumference (378675 km).
- The difference between the distance (373644 km) and Saturn Circumference = 5031 km.
- Saturn moves this 5031 km in 518 seconds. Means
- If Saturn day period = 39039 seconds Saturn could move during its day period a distance
= its circumference… why does Saturn day period is shorter with 1.3%?
- The data analysis shows there's a geometrical reason behind forces Saturn to move
during its day period a distance less with 1.3% than its circumference
More data
10747 days (Saturn orbital period) = 257928 h = 10.7 h (Saturn day) x 2 x 12053
But
1433 mkm (Saturn orbital distance) = (12053 km x π)2
But
Saturn diameter (120536 km) = π2
x 12104 km Venus Diameter (error 1)
(the difference between 12104 km and 12053 km is 0.4%)
Why Saturn Day Period = 10.7 hours?
https://www.academia.edu/49038307/Why_Saturn_Day_Period_10_7_hours
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/why-saturn-day-period-107-hours
or

I do this research
2nd
48
Also

I do this research
2nd
49
Question No. (24)
24- Who can explain the collective IQ Blunder of the Big Bang Belief?
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Who_can_explain_the_collective_IQ_Blunder_of_the_Big_Bang
_Belief
Otto E. Rossler
Best Greetings
The big bang theory can't be a fact at all cases
Because
The solar planets data be created based on each other and not by random
Let's summarize this vision in following
(1)
The solar planets as separated rigid bodies independent from each other in their motions
under masses gravity effect. This classical description should be changed
(2)
The solar planets motions consist together one unified motion, based on that, the planets
motions be similar to the train carriages motion. All planets move together one unified
general motion.
(3)
Planets data be created depend on other planets data to perform the general motions
harmony.
As in the double production experiment, where electron and positron be created from gamma
ray, the 2 particles charges are created depend on one another because of the charge
reservation law where the 2 particles move by their charges effect. By that, they move
complementary motions.
(4)
The planets unified motion necessitates to create different rates of time for the planets
motion. by that
1 hour of Mercury Motion be = 9.18 hours of Pluto motion
And
1 hour of Earth motion be = 6.38 hours of Pluto motion.
As a result
The solar planets motions together create one great a clock
(5)
The motion be transported among the solar planets.
By the motion transportation the rates of time be created and the planets motions
unifications is performed.
No confirmation that, The motion transportation nature be mechanical transportation and
because of that no obligation to attribute mechanical features for the space
(6)
There's one equation control all solar planets data?

I do this research
2nd
50
Also

I do this research
2nd
51
Question No. (25)
25- Is physics ill: The Big-Bang Blunder seen as an Informatics Problem
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is-Physics-ill
Otto E. Rossler
Best Greetings
I know one reason why the physics is ill
Because
The solar system study doesn't interest for Planets Motion Data
Many theories are created based on (some) imaginations, while, on the other side, the planets
data is found to guide us to the truth.
Let's use the Big Bang Theory as example
Big Bang Theory is mistaken in concept, it supposes the planets are separated rigid bodies
created by random process. And it's not true. The solar planets data are created based on
geometrical rules and depends on one another –means-
There's ONE EQUATION controls all planets motions data, let's provide one example
Example no. (1)
(Neptune axial tilt 28.3 deg/ Saturn axial tilt 26.7 deg) = (Saturn axial tilt 26.7 deg/ Mars
axial tilt 25.2 deg) = (Mars axial tilt 25.2 deg/ Earth axial tilt) =1.0725
The data shows that the 4 planets axial tilts are rated to each other.
The solar planets data analysis proves that, the solar group is created based on one
geometrical design and because of that the planets data be created depends on other planets
data
(no random process be found behind the solar group creation.)
Let's summarize this vision in following:
(1)
The classical description should be changed
(The classical description tells, The solar planets as separated rigid bodies independent from
each other in their motions under masses gravity effect)
(2)
The solar planets motions consist together one unified motion, based on that, the planets
motions be similar to the train carriages motion. All planets move together one unified
general motion.
(3)
The solar group is similar to a machine of gears and each planet is a gear in it. or it's similar
to one building and each planet is a part of this building. Shortly, the solar group is created
based on one geometrical design and this one design defines for each planet its data to
guarantee the motions general harmony.

I do this research
2nd
52
(4)
i.e.
The Solar Planets data be created depend on one another.
As in the double production experiment, an electron and a positron be created from gamma
ray, the 2 particles charges are created depend on one another because of the charge
reservation law where the 2 particles move by their charges effect. By that, they move
complementary motions.
(5)
The solar planets move complementary motions to be integrated together into one unified
motion (The Train Carriages Motion)
(6)
The planets unified motion necessitates to create different rates of time for the planets
motion. by that
1 hour of Mercury Motion be = 9.18 hours of Pluto motion
And
1 hour of Earth motion be = 6.38 hours of Pluto motion.
As a result
The solar planets motions together create one great a clock
(7)
The motion be transported among the solar planets.
By the motion transportation the rates of time be created and the planets motions
unifications is performed.
No confirmation that, The motion transportation nature be mechanical transportation and
because of that no obligation to attribute mechanical features for the space

I do this research
2nd
53
Also

The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)

The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)

Similar to The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II) (20)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)