Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features? (II)
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –3rd
June 2020
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometry depends On Light Motion Features
The Hypothesis proves
- The Solar System Data can be explained only by using the light motion
geometrical features … let's see some data & Rules in following:
The Equal Distances 50% at least of all distances in the solar system
distances are equal each other – we have these distances in the previous
paper (Does the Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features?)
– We can't explain why these distances are equal each other unless we
suggest that these distances are created by a light beam and its reflected one
The Rated Distances by the rate 1.0725 – these distances also we have seen
in the previous paper – around 40 % of all the solar planets distances are
rated to each by the same one rate (1.0725) and we can't explain why?
unless we suggest that – these distances also were equal as the previous
point distances but the reflected light beams of these distances are reflected
in another frame which created Lorentz length Contraction Phenomenon for
all these distances – otherwise why by the same one rate 40% of all
distances are rated
The proportionality between the matter and space in the solar system – this
also should be a proof that the solar system geometry depends on light
motion features - the previous prove we have discussed in the previous
paper with many others – is there any new proof?
A NEW PROOF
The Universe Creator is the Motion and NOT the Matter – i.e. – the
motion is found before the matter creation- this concept proves that the
solar system geometry depends on light motion features. – the paper discuss
and tries to prove this concept…

I do this research
2nd
2
1- Introduction
This paper discuss the Basic new concept
Paper Basic Concept
- The Matter Can't Created The Universe But The Motion Can
i.e.
- The Motion is found before any Matter Creation
This concept we have discussed before –basically because of Lorentz Transformations
Let's remember this analysis in following:
Again let's ask
Is Lorentz Length Contraction a real phenomenon occurred for particle own
nature or found by illusion of measurements?
The answer is
We Accept That Lorentz Length Contraction Is A Real Phenomenon And Can't Be
Illusion Of Measurements Why??
Because
1- The Physics Experimental Devices measure This Contraction And In Physics
What's Measured = What's Real (By This Rule We Save The Physics
Methodology Credibility)
2- If we claim that – the length contraction is found by illusion of measurements-
that means simply – the particle data correct definition is found only when no
difference in velocity between my motion and this particle motion – by such
way I will be The Universe Reference Point – which is similar to a person
looks a at mirror
Let's analyze length contraction phenomenon as deep as possible
(1) LENGTH CONTRACTION CONCEPT can't be clear for us – where – in mass
increasing explanation we have understood that – Particle mass is increased
because more energy is provided to the particle through its acceleration – and this
energy causes the mass increasing (E=mc2
) – but why the length is contracted? If
the particle is provided with more energy that means more mass, more volume
…etc means particle length should be increased and not contracted! So why the
length is contracted?! Still the analysis point is difficult because – While particle

I do this research
2nd
3
length and mass only are changed with this particle high velocity motion- we have
no explanation why these 2 data only are changed by such motion? why particle
density doesn’t change with particle high velocity motion "for example"?! And
still the analysis faces a complex question because – based on these changes we
had to have an equation expresses any particle length and its mass – also this
equation is still absent-
And at end we don't understand why Einstein didn't interest for particle length and
mass changes in his theory- instead – he used space-time geometry to explain the
distance & time changes by particle high velocity motion, ignoring the particle
length and mass as if their equations were not found?!
Still we don't understand why Lorentz and also Einstein dealt with the particle
length and distance are equivalent to each other – where one equation only
expresses any particle length contraction and & its distance – as if the particle
length is equivalent to the distance!
(2) But…. If particle data is created as a function of its motion – as Lorentz
Transformations tell us – that will causes a serious difficulty the planet motion
explanation based on Newton Mechanics – Where Newton tells that – The planet
motion is caused by masses gravity forces – now Lorentz tells us that – the planet
(particle) mass is created as a function of its motion – means the motion was
found before the mass creation – Where we know that Newton and Lorentz both
are correct – because of that we need to solve the apparent contradiction between
their theories…
For detailed discussion please review
Is There A Contradiction In The Physics Book? https://vixra.org/abs/1911.0470
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134
Paper Contents
2- The Motion is the Universe Creator
3- The solar system geometry depends on light motion features (the proves revision)

I do this research
2nd
4
2- The Motion is the Universe Creator
2-1 Preface
2-2 The Planet moves following a light motion
2-3 The plant motion for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second
2-4 the solar system moves one unified motion as a train moves with its carriages
2-1 Preface
This Concept "The Motion is the universe creator" I have concluded based on the
light & Planet motions interactions
in my previous papers we have discussed that – the planet moves to follow a light
motion- that means – the planet motion is consisted of 2 motions – the planet (matter)
motion which we see and the light motion which we don't see
The planet and light move through the same distance but with different rate of time
This concept is one of the basic concepts we have concluded from the planet data
analysis – let's see one example to explain this concept
Example No. 1
Light known velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for a solar day (86400 seconds) a distance
= 25920 mkm
But
The planets motions distances total during a solar day = 17.75 mkm
i.e. the planets motions distances total can be = 25920 mkm in a period =1461 days
Now the period 1461 days is Earth Cycle (365+365+365+366 days)
and because the values are in harmony I suggest that there's some geometrical
mechanism behind created these values in such harmony and consistency
I concluded that – the planets motions total follow the light motion – because they
move equal distances – based on that – there are 2 motions found here
So
If we see only the planets motions cover the distance 25920 mkm – but our vision
deceives us simply as in the mirage case – but the fact is that – there's a light beam
travels this same distance in a solar day
i.e.
1 solar day of light motion is an equivalent to the planets motions for 1461 days
Equal distances and Different Rates of time – that tells us that – we deal with 2
motions at least – the planet and the light motion

I do this research
2nd
5
Now
When I provide such data – the available explanation usually tells that – these values
are found by pure coincidences of numbers
We need to overcome this claim because we need to know the truth behind –
My basic proof against the "Pure Coincidence" Claim – is that – The Planets Data Is
Directed Data – let's deepen our understanding here
"The Data Direction" is an expression means the data is not originated by any
random process – but by directed process – here we can disprove the pure coincidence
claim easily – because we don't deal with a random process – on the contrary we deal
with a directed process – let's use one more example
Example No. 2
2 Jupiter Diameters + 1 Saturn Diameter = the solar planets diameters total
Jupiter Diameter = 8 Planets Diameters Total
Jupiter Energy = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total x 2
Jupiter Diameter x The Sun Diameter = (Jupiter Circumference)2
= Jupiter
Energy
Jupiter orbital circumference depends on the inner planets diameters total
The Discussion
The previous data can't be created by any random process – it's a directed data – and
this data tells that Jupiter data is related to the solar system data total –
Means
Jupiter diameter expresses 8 planets diameters total and Jupiter energy expresses the
solar planets circumferences total…..
It can't be pure coincidence to be used Jupiter data in each time to produce the solar
planets data total – So there's no random here – we deal with directed data which is
created based on geometrical rules – means – this data is created based on a
geometrical mechanism behind…

I do this research
2nd
6
2-2 The Planet moves following a light motion
Let's suppose that – There's a light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km/sec
So
Can we by Theoretical Methods Only Conclude That There's A Light Velocity
=1.16 mkm/sec?
I-Data
Let's summarize the answer in following:
1- The Planets Data provides a clear consistency with a value =1.16 mkm/sec
2- This value (or velocity) 1.16 mkm/sec is used frequently – and this using is in
consistency with other many data – let's provide one example to see much
better
(I)
a. Jupiter Energy is created by a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
travels during 2 solar days (2 x 86400 seconds)
b. "Jupiter Energy" is the name I call the distance between Jupiter and
Pluto – where this distance is divided by very specific method – I did that
because I suppose (Space = Energy) – so when we review in full details
the distance between Pluto and Jupiter we will find that this distance is
created by specific geometrical rules and this same distance can be
created by the velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) motion during 2 solar days – I
have concluded based on that – these distance is created by this light
velocity and because of that I have supposed that there's a light beam its
velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
(II)
c. Light with supposed velocity (1.16 mkm/sec) travels Jupiter orbital
circumference (4900 mkm) during a period =4222.6 seconds – but
Mercury Day period =4222.6 hours and Mercury moves during its day
period a distance =720.7 mkm = Mercury Jupiter distance – this data
pushed me to conclude that – the relationship between Mercury and
Jupiter depends on this period (4222.6 hours) and means this relationship
is created by the light beam which travels during (4222.6 seconds) and
see and 4222.6 hours (Mercury day period) – this conclusion was
supported because Jupiter energy already uses the velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
and Jupiter data shows a deep mutual effect between Jupiter and
Mercury – which supports this idea
(III)

I do this research
2nd
7
d. Mercury Day period needs 5040 seconds to be = 176 solar days - now
the light beam supposed velocity 1.16 mkm/sec can travels during this
period 5040 seconds a distance = Mercury Pluto Distance – this data is
so important because (1st
) Pluto is Jupiter Partner to define "Jupiter
Energy" where this energy is seen in the distance between Jupiter and
Pluto
e. Mars Migration Theory tells that Pluto was the Mercury moon and that
causes the relationship between both – and because of that – the value
5040 seconds is so effective value in the solar system geometry – where
simply this value 5040 is the connection between Mercury and Pluto
(IV)
f. More data may support our discussion –
i. 5040 seconds = 84 minutes but Mercury during 84 days moves a
distance = 346.6 mkm (but 346.6 days = the nodal year)
ii. Mercury during a nodal year (346.6 days) moves a distance
=1433.5 mkm (Saturn orbital distance)
iii. Mercury during 1433.5 days moves a distance = 5848 mkm =
Mercury Pluto Distance – So there's some connection in the data
iv. Note please – the distances values are used as periods of time
because we deal with light motion – and as we know that – x=ct
and when c=1 so x=t that's why the distance values are used as
periods of time
v. Based on this data I have concluded that mercury motion follow
the light motion – this concept we have discussed frequently
II-Discussion
Can we see the planet motion follows a light motion?!
In Mercury Pluto Distance Example we have seen that clearly – we don't observe the
light motion – but this motion creates points in its trajectory for the planet to follow –
the points are that – the value 5040 seconds = 84 minutes - if Mercury uses it as 84
days so Mercury moves 346.6 mkm – Mercury will use 346.6 mkm as 346.6 days to
produce 1433.5 mkm and then use 1433.5 days to produce 5848 mkm – the points in
Mercury Data shows clearly that Mercury follows the light motion
Let's use another example
Example No. 3
Mercury Day Period = 4222.6 hours
Now

I do this research
2nd
8
Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference)
during 4222.6 seconds –
Now this distance 4900 mkm is seen by us as 4500 mkm by Lorentz length
Contraction rate (1.0725) which we will review in full details in the proves revision
(Point No. 3)
Means
It's the same rate 1.0725 which is used for all the planets distances – it's a fact – and
this distance 4900 mkm is contracted and seen as 4500 mkm by us
4500 mkm = 2π x 720 mkm (Mercury Jupiter Distance)
Means – the light travels during 4222.6 seconds a distance (relative to or depend on)
720 mkm = Mercury Jupiter Distance
But
Mercury moves during its day period (4222.6 hours) a distance =720 mkm= Mercury
Jupiter Distance
Wee reach to the same point from different roads to consider that's happened by pure
coincidences is absolute illogical – we here deal with a geometrical mechanism in
which the light and planet motions are interacted with each other to produce solar
system as we see –
So- The conclusion should be – there's a light motion a accompanying with the planet
motion -
The idea is clear and proved clearly also
The analysis of Jupiter effect on the inner planets shows that- the planets motions
depend on light different motions and by that we have concluded that the light
motions created a network which produced the planet motions (and also created the
planet matter)
The conclusion
The Light Motion is The Distance Creator and Energy provider
The light motion causes the planet to move (the planet here is a point only)
Based on the planet motion the planet matter is created (the matter is created as
a function of its motion)
Shortly
The solar system is a network of light motions and interactions and based on
this network the planet matter and motion is created
That's Why The Motion is The Universe Creator and Not The Matter

I do this research
2nd
9
2-3 The plant motion for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second
This is one of the planet motion concepts – let's remember them in following
(1st
Concept)
Planet Motion for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second
(2nd
Concept)
Planet Matter is created based on Planet motion for 1 solar day
(3rd
Concept)
The Solar Planets move One Unified Motion
In the previous sub-points (2-1 and 2-2) I have tried to prove that the planet motion
depends on light motion – as short as possible – because these concepts were
discussed frequently in my previous papers
Here we need to review the 1st
concept that
(1st
Concept)
Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day Depends On Light Motion For 1 Second
But is it true?
Because we have seen that the 1 second of light motion is seen as 1 hour of Mercury
day period (4222.6 hours) – so the concept is puzzled based on that?!
This Concept Is A Fact Because Of The Second Concept – that means –
Because the Planet matter is created depending on Planet Motion for 1 solar
day – the planet has to move 1 solar day for each 1 second of light motion –
that because the planet motion and matter both are energy provided by light
motion
??!
The solar system is A Great Clock – its motions aim to create a solar day from
one second – that means – the light motion for 1 second provides an energy
received by the solar planets and the planets work together to make this one
second of time equivalent to one solar day – it’s the main job for the solar
system – based on that – one planet motion changes 1 second into 1 minute and
another planet motion changes 1 minute into one hour …..etc so the calendar is
created based on the planets different motions
For that – Not each planet motion for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1
second – but – The Main Planet Only
And why??
Because the planet matter is created as a function of its motion – the planet
matter by this planet motion for 1 solar day – that means – the matter creation

I do this research
2nd
10
defines a specific rate 1 day for 1 second and this rate can't be similar to any
other rate because based on this specific rate the matter is created
What planet then??
Jupiter
Jupiter motion for 1 solar day produces a distance =1.16 mkm which is passed
by light motion during 1 second (Calculations Error 2.2%)
Jupiter motion for 1 solar day produces a distance = the outer planets
circumferences total
We are very near from some clear fact
Jupiter motion for a solar day produces 2 results (light motion distance for 1
second and the outer planets circumferences total) –Based on that Jupiter
performs the concept clearly –
And Jupiter is the main planet in the solar system as we have discussed
frequently before
Note Please
Pluto
Pluto moves per a solar day a distance =406000 km = the solar planets
diameters total
This data also tells that – the planet matter is created based on the planet motion
for 1 solar day
Pluto Motion – This data should be considered as so important data – because
Jupiter Energy is restricted between Jupiter and Pluto – that tells us the solar
planets matters (volumes and masses…etc) were created by Jupiter energy
which is found between Jupiter and Pluto – that's why Jupiter and Pluto motion
for 1 solar day shows the planets diameters and circumferences total
Please review
Is Jupiter The Solar System Parent? (Jupiter Energy Analysis)
https://www.academia.edu/43030586/Is_Jupiter_The_Solar_System_Parent_Jupiter_Energy_Analys
is_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/is-jupiter-the-solar-system-parent-jupiter-energy-
analysis

I do this research
2nd
11
2-4 the solar system moves one unified motion as a train moves with its carriages
This concept we have discussed before frequently
And this concept can be produced by light motion features more suitable than the
rigid body motion features
The solar system is a similar to a train all carriages move together
And
As we have discussed before – the solar system is a great clock – and they move
depending on each other to produce one solar day from 1 second
That's why the planet move one unified motion
Because their motions are depending on each other
Regardless the difference in velocities between the planets motions because they have
different rates of time
This concept we have discussed deeply in my papers
My Research Hypotheses
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion (As A Train Motion)

I do this research
2nd
12
3-The Solar System Depends On Light Motion Features (The Proves Revision)
3-1 The Equal Distances
Why These Distances Are Equal?
(1)
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
= Mars Orbital Circumference
= Pluto Neptune Distance
= Pluto eccentricity Distance
= Neptune Orbital Distance/π
= Uranus Orbital Distance /2
= Mercury Jupiter Distance x 2
(2)
Mercury Neptune Distance = Saturn Pluto Distance
Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Pluto Distance = Uranus Neptune Circumference
Earth Neptune Distance = Mercury Saturn Circumference (0.5%)
Jupiter Uranus Distance = Jupiter Saturn Circumference (1.5%)
(3)
Jupiter Mercury Distance = 2 Mercury Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Venus Distance = Venus Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Earth Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference
Jupiter Mercury Distance = Mars Orbital Distance x π
Jupiter Uranus Distance = Venus Jupiter Circumference
Uranus Pluto Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference x π
Pluto Orbital Distance = Earth Orbital Circumference x 2π
Why These Distances Are Equal?
Because, these distances are created by light motions – the light beam is reflected and
by that – the original light beam (a distance) = the reflected light beam (another one)
It's the most near explanation to explain this huge number of the equal distances –
Because the previous distances are more than 50% of the solar system distances – and
it's illogical be have all these equal distances by pure coincidences
Also if the planets orbital distance depends on the masses gravity – these distances
equality forms a real puzzle because the planets masses show no similar equality!
(Please note – the planet orbital distance isn't defined based on the masses gravity
because Jupiter which is the greatest mass isn't the most near planet to the sun!)
So- Why These Distances Are Equal? –
Because –they are produced by light motions
2 light beams one is original and the other is its reflected light beam – both are equal
and has equal energy where distance = energy so the distance is equal

I do this research
2nd
13
3-2 The Rated Distances
Why These Distances Are NOT Equal?
1. 0725.1
mkm2.41nceCircumfereOrbitalMoon
mkm2.58MotionDailyEarth
=
2. 1.0725
km)(378500radiusEclipseSolarTotal
km)(406000radiusorbitalApogee
=
3. 0725.1
distanceMercuryJupitermkm720.3
DistanceOrbitalJuppitermkm6.778
= (Error 0.7%)
4. 1.0725
DistanceVenusJupitermkm670
distanceMercuryJupitermkm720.3
=
5. 1.0725
DistanceEarthJupitermkm629
DistanceVenusJupitermkm670
= (0.6%)
6. 1.0725
mkm)(1325.3DistanceVenusSarurn
mkm)(1433.5DistanceOrbitalSaturn
= (0.8%)
7. 1.0725
mkm)(1205.6DistanceMarsSarurn
mkm)(1284DistanceEarthSaturn
= (0.7%)
8. 1.0725
mkm)(2644DistanceMarsUranus
mkm)(2872.5DistanceOrbitalUranus
= (0.7%)
9. 1.0725
mkm)(4495.1DistanceOrbitalNeptune
mkm)(4894nceCircumfereOrbitalJupiter
= (1.5 %)
(10) The Planets Axial Tilts Also Use This Same Rate!
If the rate 1.0725 is produced by Lorentz length contraction effect – so the previous
data can be explained – Where the distances are equal (in previous point) because
these distances are light beams and their reflected light beams
And now
Why the distances are NOT equal?
0725.1
T.AxailEarth23.4
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailMars25.2
T.AxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailSatrun26.7
TiltAxailNeptune28.3
===

I do this research
2nd
14
Because these distances are light beams and their reflected light beams (as the
previous equal distances)
But
The reflected light beams pass through another frame – and because of that – these
distances specifically suffered from Lorentz length contraction effect and because of
that all these distances are contracted by the same rate 1.0725
Of course – we have to agree that "Space = Energy" – this concept is necessary for
the explanation – and we can imagine that – the light motion creates the distance –
that means – the light provides the required energy to create the required distance –
based on that we can accept that "Space = Energy".
Please see Equation No. 10
"Neptune Axial Tilt" is the parent of this equation – the value 28.3 is contracted by
the rate 1.0725 and produced 26.7 (Saturn axial tilt) which will be contracted also by
the same rate to produce 25.2 (Mars axial tilt) which will be contracted also to
produce 23.4 (Earth Axial Tilt) – the order also is logical because Neptune is the
energy source of the inner planets–this idea we discussed in (Jupiter Energy Analysis)
Deep Discussion
The paper objective is to explain how the data is created – in the previous 3 examples
– the data is puzzled – so the suggestion of the light motion behind the planet motion
is a very useful suggestion to explain how this data is created
In the paper we'll discuss many different data which can be explained only by the
hypothesis "The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion" –
Matter Origin and Creation
https://www.academia.edu/43214351/Matter_Origin_and_Creation
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43197587/Is_Saturn_The_Last_Planet_Created_In_The_Solar_S
ystem_II_

I do this research
2nd
15
3-3 The Proportional Between The Matter And Space
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc?
Because
(The sun diameter/ the moon diameter) = (earth orbital distance/earth moon distance)
Why The Distances Rate = The Diameters Rate?
Just if we suppose that – the matter is created by light motion – and – distance is
energy and creation also by light motion – based on that – we will reach to one hand
behind both the diameters and distances
The eclipse phenomenon was the first question – because we didn't understand – how
the distances rate can be created equal to the diameters rate if both are created
independent from each other – on the contrary – they both created based on each other
– but how that can be possible – the light is the power can perform this task
There's one more notice we may refer to here:
- The Moon angular angle =0.5 degrees – that means – 2 sun rays touches the moon
both sides the angle between these 2 sun rays =0.5 degrees
- i.e.
- the moon diameter (3475 km) is equivalent to an angle =0.5 degrees
- What about the full 360 degrees
- 360 degrees (based on this same rate) should define 2.5 million km – but the moon
orbital circumference = 2.5 million km
- and that means
- the same angle define the moon angular diameter and its orbital circumference –
that's the same idea – the diameter and distance has the same rate – regardless by
what mechanism that's done – we know that's done by the light motion –
And based on that we can conclude that
- The solar system geometry depends on light motion features

I do this research
2nd
16
3-4- The Distance Values using as Periods of Time
Frequently we have seen that the distances values are used as periods of time
For example
(1)
- Mercury moves during its rotation period (58.66 solar days) a distance = 243 mkm
- Mars moves during the sun day period (116.7 solar days) a distance = 243 mkm
But
- 243 days = Venus Rotation Period
(2)
Table No.1 error
-1433.5 days x Mercury velocity daily 4.095 mkm = 5870 mkm Pluto Orbital Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Venus velocity daily 3.02 mkm = 4329 mkm Venus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Earth velocity daily 2.58 mkm = 3699 mkm Jupiter Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Mars velocity daily 2.082 mkm = 2984.5 mkm Uranus Pluto Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Jupiter velocity daily 1.1318 mkm = 1622.4 mkm Uranus Neptune Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Saturn velocity daily 0.838 mkm = 1201 mkm Mars Saturn Distance 0.3%
-1433.5 days x Uranus velocity daily 0.5875 mkm = 842 mkm
-1433.5 days x Neptune velocity daily 0.4665 mkm = 670 mkm Venus Jupiter Distance 0
-1433.5 days x Pluto velocity daily 0.406 mkm = 582 mkm Mercury Earth distance*2Π 1%
We have discussed that before please review
The Time Definition
also
Solar Group Geometrical Structure

I do this research
2nd
17
3-5- Are There Different Rates Of Time In The Solar System?
This idea we have discussed frequently – let's provide here 2 examples only
(1)
10921 km (Earth Circumference) x 86400 seconds ( a solar day) =940 mkm
(940 mkm = Earth orbital circumference)
This equation tells us that
If Earth revolves around the sun a complete revolution in one solar day only – so the
Earth moon circumference will be = a distance of Earth Motion for 1 second only
This equation refers to that
One Solar Day On The Sun = One Sidereal Year On Earth
Is it proof? Not
But it's a reference that – the planet matter is created as a function of its motion and to
be in harmony with the other planets data and motions
(2)
10921 km (Earth Circumference) x 27.3 days =300000 km
The equation tells that
If the Earth Moon rotates around its axis one rotation per a solar day (as the Earth
does) so the moon will travel a distance = 300000 km during its orbital period (27.3
days)
Light travels per a second a distance = 300000 km
The value (1 second) is repeated with the moon circumference which may tell that
there's some mechanism behind created the moon circumference to be in harmony
with these equations!
(3)
Earth moves per solar day a distance = 2.58 mkm = The Earth Moon
displacement total during a synodic month (29.53 days)
The distance is equal
That pushes me to suppose that 1 day on Earth =29.53 days on the Moon
Because the distance is equal
Now
We know that 1 day on the Sun = 365.25 days on Earth –
But 1 day on Earth = 29.53 days on the moon – so
1 day on the sun = 10747 days on the moon
But
10747 days = Saturn orbital period
Because the data is in harmony with each other I suppose these rates of time are found
Please review
Matter Origin and Creation (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43214392/Matter_Origin_and_Creation_II_

I do this research
2nd
18
References
Is There A Parallel Universe (I)
https://www.academia.edu/43150627/Is_There_A_Parallel_Universe
"Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit?"
https://www.academia.edu/43133509/Can_The_Gravity_Forces_Create_The_Moon_Orbit
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/can-the-gravity-forces-create-the-moon-orbit
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/43140027/Can_The_Gravity_Forces_Create_The_Moon_Orbit_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/can-the-gravity-forces-create-the-moon-orbit-ii
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)

Similar to Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II) (20)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)