Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit (II)

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit? (II)
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt –23rd
May 2020
1- Abstract
We complete our discussion in the previous paper
Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit?
we have faced a major question which is:
Does The Moon Motion By The Masses Gravity?
Yes
But the masses gravity can't create the moon orbit – let's to answer in following:
- The Light Moves Firstly Because The Light Motion Creates The Distance And
Provides The Energy
- The Planet Moves Secondly Because The Planet Follows The Light Motion
Through The Same Distance And Receives The Providing Energy
- The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion
i.e.
- There's A Parallel Universe Which We Don't See – Specifically – The Planet
Motion hides A Light Motion Accompanying It
- The Created Matter Resists To Save The Motion Based On Which This Matter
Is Created – The Matter Resistance we know as the masses gravity forces
The paper tries to prove this fact
Paper Contents
2- The Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion
3- A Light Motion Is Accompanying With The Planet Motion
4- The Parallel Universe
5- The Masses Gravity Origin

I do this research
2nd
2
2- The Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion
This fact we have learnt from Lorentz – When we have asked our basic question
Is The Particle Length Contraction Phenomenon A real phenomenon or illusion of
measurements?
Is the particle own length contracted by high velocity motion? and why?
This discussion we have discussed frequently – and we have concluded that –
Lorentz Length Contraction Effect is a real phenomenon and can't be an illusions of
measurements
Why?
Because
(1st
) The Empirical Measurements Prove This Phenomenon – And In Physics What's
Measured Is The Real – the physics adopts this concept to protect the experiment
creditability as a physics research method – where in physics – we attribute any
property based on experimental results…
(2nd
) If the particle correct data is defined when no difference in velocities between
my motion and this particle motion – that means –I'm The Universe Reference Point
So based on the previous argument we have to accept that –
The Particle Own Length Is Changed By High Velocity Motion
i.e.
The Particle Own Data Is Changed By High Velocity Motion
Now We May Ask Why??
The direct conclusion is that – the light velocity was a player in the particle data
definition - that means – when the particle doesn't move relative to me - i.e. when the
particle be in static case relative to me – in this situation – This Particle properties
Which I discover when the particle is in static case relative to me – these properties
are defined relative to the light velocity (0.3 mkm/sec)!
Why?
Because when the particle travels with high velocity these properties are changed –
means – this particle original properties must be defined relative to the light velocity
How to prove that?! let's ask another question
Why the particle behaves as particle and not as a wave after its observation – but
before the observation it may behave as a particle or wave…! So what's happened
with the observation? How does the observer effect on the object (Particle Or Wave)
to force it to behave as particle only after the observation?

I do this research
2nd
3
I suggest that the human realization process is a player in the particle data definition-
now the human mind realization may use the light velocity
Because
The human mind has electromagnetic pulses which can be measured by any medical
device (Spite the pulses velocity is so weak but the electromagnetic velocity can be
restored directly in any piece of vacuum)
We don't know what's the geometrical mechanism by which this process is done but
the data shows that the conclusion is almost correct
The Conclusion
1- The Matter Is Created A Function Of Its Motion
2- The light velocity is a player in the particle data definition

I do this research
2nd
4
3- A Light Motion Is Accompanying With The Planet Motion
I suggest that there's a light motion accompanying the planet motion
So the idea becomes clear
- If the matter is created as a function of its motion
- That means – the motion is found before the matter creation
- So – the motion is the light motion found before the planet creation –
- Now – the planet follows the light motion (but the planet now has no matter
yet!) – but if the matter isn’t created yet which is "The Planet" in this case?
- We have only one information that – the light motion causes another motion
(which I call the plant motion but the planet isn't created yet!)
- The planet matter is created as a function of its motion - as Lorentz tells us
- The created matter resists to save the motion on which the matter is created –
and this matter resistance is called "The masses gravity forces"
What we will do in this point?
I will provide some data to prove that there's a light motion accompanying with the
planet motion …because we can't observe the light motion so how can we prove that
this motion is accompanying the plant motion
Let's see the data in following
I- Data
(1)
86400. seconds x 0.3 mkm /sec = 25920 mkm
(2)
4222.6 seconds x 1.16 mkm /sec = 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)
(3)
5040 seconds x 1.16 mkm /sec = 5848 mkm (Mercury Pluto Distance)
(4)
Jupiter Energy
These 4 data may prove that the planet motion is accompanying with a light motion
Let's discuss them in following…

I do this research
2nd
5
Equation No. (1)
(1)
86400 seconds x 0.3 mkm /sec = 25920 mkm
Light with known velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) travels a distance = 25920 mkm during one
solar day (86400 seconds)
But
The planets motions distances total per solar day = 17.75 mkm
That means
The planets motions distances total during 1461 days will be = 25920 mkm
So- the distance which is passed by light motion in (1 solar day) is passed also by all
planets motions during a period (1461 days)
i.e.
We have 2 motions for the same distance but with 2 rates of time
But we know that
25920 years = The Precession Cycle
Why the distance 25920 mkm is seen as 25920 years?!
Because it's a light motion where x =ct when c =1 so x=t that's why we see the
distance value as a period of time
Based on this analysis I suggest that there's a light motion accompanying the planet
motion-
But
Is it true? Can this previous data prove this heavy claim?
We have no tools to discover the fact – because – we can't observe the light motion
and we have no geometrical mechanism by which we can understand how the planet
motion depends on light motion
All What We Have Is The Previous Data –
The argument here is that – the light (supposed) motion is found always connected
with The Planet Data
As in the previous example – I use the light known velocity (0.3mkm/sec) and the
solar day period – these values are astronomical values – also the planets motions
distances total (17.75 mkm) and the Period 1461 days (365+365+365+366) – means
we use known astronomical values – if the light motion explanation is incorrect so
these values must be found by pure coincidences! But there are more examples –
where it may be illogical to consider many pure coincidences found together!

I do this research
2nd
6
Equation No. (2)
4222.6 seconds x 1.16 mkm /sec = 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)
I suppose there's a light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
Now this light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) travels a distance = 4900 mkm = Jupiter orbital
circumference during a period =4222.6 seconds
This is the information based on which I claim there's a light beam accompanying
with the planet motion –
But is it true information? Let's see more data
- 4222.6 hours = Mercury Day Period
- Mercury moves during its day period (4222.6 h) a distance =720.7 mkm=
Mercury Jupiter Distance
- Also the distance 778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital distance) = 1.0725 x 720.7 mkm
(Mercury Jupiter Distance) - and we agreed that the rate 1.0725 is Lorentz
length Contraction rate – that means the value 778.6 mkm and 720.7 mkm are
one value but the difference is found by the length contraction effect
- The value 4222.6 s still works strongly – for example 4222.6 mkm = 2π x670
mkm (where 670 mkm = Venus Jupiter Distance) – and we know that – 680
mkm = Venus orbital circumference – means – Venus moves during its orbital
period a distance = Venus Jupiter Distance (error 1.4%) and this behavior is
similar o Mercury behavior
- (5040/4222.6) = 928 mkm/ 778.6 mkm – where 928 mkm = Earth Jupiter
distance when they be at 2 different sides from the sun – where mercury day
needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days –
Are these data prove the idea?
All what we have is a light beam (with supposed velocity 1.16 mkm/sec) – travels
during 4222.6 seconds – so this number 4222.6 second controls Mercury, Venus and
Earth Motions – can that be proof for the claim " A light motion is accompanying
with the planet motion"
We try to explain how the data is created
Mercury, Venus and Earth behave very similar to each other – so if the connection
between them is this light beam motion – may it be logical- but is it a sufficient
proof? I don't know

I do this research
2nd
7
Equation No. (3)
5040 seconds x 1.16 mkm /sec = 5848 mkm (Mercury Pluto Distance)
Mercury needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days
Light with supposed velocity travels during 5040 seconds a distance = 5848mkm
(Mercury Pluto Distance)
But
Mercury during 346.6 ( The Nodal Year) travels a distance = 1433.5 mkm (Saturn
Orbital Distance)
Now if this distance 1433.5 mkm is used as a period of time 1433.5 days
So
Mercury moves during this period (1433.5 days) a distance = 5848 mkm (= Mercury
Pluto Distance)
That tells us – The planet motion follows the light motion – where the data shows this
fact clearly
Again – We have no empirical proves for that nor a geometrical mechanism to explain
how the planet motion follows the light motion
We just have the data among the planet data – so the previous explanation powerful
argument depends on the number 5040 seconds which creates the question why
Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days
I try to show that – there's a parallel universe to what we see –
What does that mean?
The planets matters are created as functions of their motions - and based on that – the
planet data is created depending on their motions - but the planets motions are
created depending on light motions and because of the same data is transported from
one hand to another –
Example For Explanation
We consider each planet has its Own Axial Tilt – but the equation shows that – 4
planets axial tilts are created depending on each other –
I try to show that – the planets same data is used by some different method from our
understanding – that means – This same data effects geometrically on the solar system
geometry by different ways that creates the final motion of the solar system but we
explain this motion based on our direct vision where the hidden players are more
effective of the solar system geometry. It's A Parallel Universe

I do this research
2nd
8
4- A Parallel Universe
We see the planets motions considering that these motions are found by the masses
gravity forces
But
The matter is created as a function of this matter motion according to Lorentz
Transformations
That means – the planets motions weren't defined by these planets masses – on the
contrary – These planets masses are defined based on their motions –
So the vision is almost different
The light motion which is hidden and unknown – this light motion is the creator of the
distance and provide of the energy – now the planet matter data and motion depends
on these light motions
It's 2 parallel universes
What we see and what we don't see
Of course there's a geometrical mechanism by which the planet motion depends on
light motion – there's a geometrical mechanism connects both universes together –
But
What we know now is that
The Conclusion
1- The Planets Matters and Data Is Created Based ON Light Motion
2- the created matter provides the masses gravity to save the motion based on
which they are lived.
Equation (a)
10921 km (the moon circumference) x 27.3 days = 300000 km
This equation tells that – If the moon rotates around its axis once per a solar day (as
the Earth does) so the moon during its orbital period (27.3 days) will pass a distance =
light motion for 1 second
The secret word here is – the moon orbital period 27.3 days – because the equation
tells that – the moon circumference is created relative to its orbital period
It's the light effect on the planet motion
Equation (a)
10921 km (the moon circumference) x 86400 seconds = 940 mkm
This equation tells that – If Earth revolves around the sun one complete revolution in
one solar day only – so – the moon circumference will be = Earth motion for 1 second
This equation also tells bout the light motion because the different rates of time can be
produced by high velocity motion

I do this research
2nd
9
5- The Masses Gravity Origin
Again
Does the planet move by the masses gravity forces? Yes
But
The Created Matter Resists To Save The Motion Based On Which This Matter Is
Created – The Matter Resistance we know as the masses gravity forces
Based on that, the planets masses gravity must be depending on each other let's see
that in following:
2-1 Planet Gravity Equation
Gerges Equation For Planet Gravity
Table No. 1
Planet Equation Resulted Registered Error
The Sun (Earth/Sun diameters rate)2
(Sun Mass/
Earth Mass)* earth gravity
= (1/109)2
* 333000*9.8= 274
274 274 0
Moon (3.66)2
x (0.073 / 5.97) x 9.8 1.6 m/sec2
1.6 m/sec2
0
Mercury (2.61)2
x (0.23/5.97) x 9.8 3.7 m/sec2
3.7 m/sec2
0
Venus (1.0538)2
x 4.87 /5.97) x 9.8 8.9 m/sec2
8.9 m/sec2
0
Earth 9.8 9.8 9.8 0
Mars (1.878)2
x (0.642 / 5.97) x 9.8 3.7 m/sec2 3.7 m/sec2 0
Jupiter (0.0892)2
x (1898 / 5.97) x 9.8 24.7 m/sec2 23.1 m/sec2 6.9%
Saturn (0.10582)2
x (568/5.97) x 9.8 10.44 m/sec2 9 m/sec2 16%
Uranus (0.25)2
x (86.8/5.97) x 9.8 8.9 8.7 2.3%
Neptune (0.2575)2
x (102/ 5.97) x 9.8 11.1 m/sec2
11 m/sec2
0.9%
Pluto (5.337)2
(0.0131 / 5.97) x 9.8 0.6125 m/sec2
0.6 m/sec2
2%
- Discussion
1. We can see that, the Equation is working sufficiently with all planets and even the sun
follows this same equation, Except With Jupiter And Saturn There Are great
Errors (6.9% and 16% respectively…. Why?)
I claim there are relativistic effects in the solar group and this 2 great errors are found
basically because of it please review (http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0565)
2. we need to observe and analyze deeply The Sun Equation in row No.1 of the
previous table, because this equation supports my claim that the sun is originated
from the same source from which the solar group is originated, otherwise why the sun
herself follows the same equation? That may support my claim that, the sun rays is
created depends on solar planets motions accumulation….
The Sun Gravity Concept is Unreal (Proves) http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0569
gravityEarth)
MassEarthThe
MassPlanetThe
()
DiameterPlanetThe
DiameterEarth
(gravityplanetThe 2
××=

I do this research
2nd
10
References
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations? Why?
https://vixra.org/abs/2005.0079
Is The Earth Moon Diameter Created Based On Geometrical Calculations? Why? (II)
https://www.academia.edu/42966021/Is_The_Earth_Moon_Diameter_Created_Based
_On_Geometrical_Calculations_Why_II_
The Earth Moon is Older Than Saturn https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0573
The Earth is Older Than The Sun https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0553
The Sun Creation Reason And Effect (II) https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0534
Can Titius Bode Law Disprove Mars Immigration Theory?
https://vixra.org/abs/2004.0292
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit (II)

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit (II)

Similar to Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit (II) (20)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Can The Gravity Forces Create The Moon Orbit (II)