SharePoint Lesson #67: Connect List Data and VisioPeter Heffner
This tutorial shows how to show an display a Visio OrgChart in SP2013. The Contact List is maintained in SP2013. Visio2010 connects to the list and provides an organisational chart as a Vision Drawing. This Visio Drawing is then displayed on a Webpart page.
How to create a filtered lookup field in SharePoint 2013. When referencing to items in another list you can reduce the number of displayed items in the pickup list.
SharePoint Lesson #67: Connect List Data and VisioPeter Heffner
This tutorial shows how to show an display a Visio OrgChart in SP2013. The Contact List is maintained in SP2013. Visio2010 connects to the list and provides an organisational chart as a Vision Drawing. This Visio Drawing is then displayed on a Webpart page.
How to create a filtered lookup field in SharePoint 2013. When referencing to items in another list you can reduce the number of displayed items in the pickup list.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
1. 2.1 work
For unit 2.1 you will be assessed on your role as a performer or a coach in your chosen two activities.
You will be assessed by a moderator who will give you your mark based on the evidence you provide. Therefore you are
required to provide the following evidence:
8 x evaluation sheets for each session you take part in (over an 8 week period)
8 x evaluation sheets for the sessions you personally run (this links into 2.4 work)
Risk assessments for each of the areas you coach / perform in, e.g. netball courts, field etc.
Child protection policy (for coaches only)
6 – 8 match reports
Fixture list for the whole season
Coaching session plans to cover 8 weeks – including a detailed evaluation and how you will progress the next session
This is all underpinned by the edited video of you performing / coaching
Electronic copies can be found at: Y:AcademicResourcesCreative ArtsPhysical EducationA LEVEL PEYR 12UNIT
22.1. PERSONAL PERFORMANCE
2.1 Checklist
8 x Evaluation sheets for each personal practical session
8 x Evaluation sheets for each coaches led practical
session
Risk assessments for each area you coach/perform in
Child protection policy (coaches only)
6 - 8 x Match Reports
Fixture List
Coaching session plans (including evaluation)
DC PE Department Unit 2 starter pack
2. TRAINING SESSION OVERVIEW
Task:
2.1 – Compulsory Evidence – 8 week activity
Session Review
2.4 – Performance Analysis
4.4 – Compulsory Evidence – 8 week activity
Name: Date: 02/02/10
Objective: Evidence /review a training session
Performance role:
Activity: U18 DC
Borgs – Perceived rate of exertion:
Exhausting 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Very Light
Preparation: Excellent Good Poor
Punctuality (On time) 5 4 3 2 1 (Late)
Equipment (Everything) 5 4 3 2 1 (Missing)
Physiological (Ready ) 5 4 3 2 1 (Lacking)
Psychological (Focused) 5 4 3 2 1 (Distracted)
Warm-up (Ordered) 5 4 3 2 1 (Missed)
Performance: Excellent Good Poor
Technical proficiency 5 4 3 2 1
Fitness for purpose 5 4 3 2 1
Decision making – individual 5 4 3 2 1
Concentration 5 4 3 2 1
Cooperation – with team 5 4 3 2 1
Session Outline:
1. Warm up – light jog, passing drill, evolved to 2 on 1 passing drill then stretching
2. Forwards focused on ruck defence
3. Backs and forwards came together to go through game plans and defensive systems
Session review: Session review:
Strengths Weaknesses
1. Communication was good throughout 1. Sometimes got a bit confused around the ruck
the team area with which side to pillar first
2. Focused and ready for the session
Evaluation: (Goal Setting/Targets)
1. Think about where I am going to defend around the ruck before reaching the ruck
Tutor / Coach Signed: Date: 02/02/10
This information will be very detailed in your
2.4 work
DC PE Department Unit 2 starter pack
3. AS PHYSICAL EDUCATION
DUBAICOLLEGE>< RISK ASSESSMENT DATE: -
COACHING SESSION FOR 2.1- PERSONAL PERFORMANCE
RISK ASSESSMENT SCALE OF 25
LIKELIHOOD 1 – 5 (1 NOT LIKELY, 5 MOST CERTAINLY)
SEVERITY OF RISK 1 – 5 (1 VERY LOW RISK, 5 SEVERE RISK)
IF ACTIVITY IS ASSESSED AS MORE THAN 12, THE ACTIVITY SHOULD NOT TAKE PLACE
POTENTIAL HAZARD NATURE OF THREAT RISK FACTOR ACTION REQUIRED
(IDENTIFY WHAT MIGHT HARM YOU) (EXPLAIN WHAT THE THREAT IS) Likelihood x Severity
ENVIRONMENT
EQUIPMENT
PLAYING AREA
ACTIVITY SPECIFIC THREATS
DC PE Department Unit 2 starter pack
4. Name: Opposition: Date:
A Jones Old Gits XV 1.10.09
Venue The DC7’s
Score
Conditions Hot – 36 degrees & Humid
League / Cup / Friendly Warfare!
Playing Position / Role Water Boy & fullback
Positive Factors
Physiological Lasted the game although was breathing heavily
Psychological Visualisation technique of pretending the game was
nearly over worked
Technical Caught balls 2
Successful tackles 3
Tactical Stayed on the touchline & didn’t get tackled
Negative Factors
Physiological Completely lacked any cardiovascular fitness
185 bpm during warm up
Psychological Opposition were strong so lacked confidence & hid in
changing room
Technical Dropped ball 15 times
Missed 24 tackles
Tactical Didn’t understand drift defence& conceded 8 tries
Evaluation / Targets Get fitter and learn the rules
DC PE Department Unit 2 starter pack
5. 2.4 work
The following will look at the first two elements of your 2.4 work that you need to start…straight away!
In unit 2.4 you are required to choose your main sport that you are a performer in, you will then complete a detailed
analysis of your participation from a variety of angles. The first two you will complete are:
Your notational analysis
Your training analysis
Your notational analysis on yourself occurs first, you notice from your notation what you need to improve and this is
then put into place in your training analysis.
The training analysis then takes place over 8 weeks with a very detailed evaluation at the end of each session.
Finally, your second notation on yourself is completed at the end of the 8 week training block and you will be able to see
if you improved and comment on that improvement.
Between your first and second notational analysis of yourself you will also look at a top class performer, you will
complete a notation on them (using the same system you will use for yourself).
Therefore, your notation work should include:
Notation introduction explaining what your notation will be looking at and why
Notation 1 on yourself
Notation 1 evaluation & areas you will look to improve from a skill & a fitness perspective
Notation on top class performer
Evaluation of the top class performer – followed by a comparison of them to you!
Notation 2 on yourself (after 8 weeks)
Evaluation of the 2nd notation
Final notation summarising the improvements you have made and reasons behind them
Notations can take many different forms and will differ between sports. You will have to personalise it to your sport so
that you get the most information possible from them.
Training analysis
This is using the same form as your 2.1 sessions; however it is just for one sport. The main focus is that you are
reflecting and evaluating after your sessions. You have to focus on the following main points in each of your evaluations
about each session:
Physiological
Psychological
Technical (technique, how effective is it)
Tactical
DC PE Department Unit 2 starter pack
6. Example of a notation, including % enables
My First Notation
you to talk about more concrete figures
Position: Goal Keeper
Opposition: Al Ain
Match: League
Successful % Unsuccessful %
rate rate
Passes 8 73 3 27
Interceptions 3 43 4 57
Blocking 8 80 2 20
Marking the shot 5 71 2 29
Rebound 0 0 0 0
Contact 1
Obstruction 4
Footwork/Repossession 0
As you can see from my first notation I passed about 8 successful passes, and 3 unsuccessful passes, this gives me a
success rate of approximately 73%. During this game I performed the basic netball passes such as chest passes and
shoulder passes. Also, I tried to make an overall total of 7 interceptions, but only 3 were successful, and I managed to
gain possession of the ball in order for us to get the ball up the court and into the net. Seeing as I played the position of
goal keeper for this match, one of the roles of GK is to mark the shot of the person shooting. This is an area of strength
for me as I have a very long reach, you can identify this strength by looking at my results table where I was 80%
successful at marking the shot, this therefore prevented the shooter from scoring goals, and so this gave us an
advantage. However, after marking the shot I failed to win any rebounds, which sometimes led to us losing the ball.
Blocking is another vital part of being a GK, if the shooter comes out of the circle, the GK must block her from coming
back in again, and shooting. As you can see from my table I managed to successfully block the shooter 5 times. As for
fouls during this game, I committed an overall of 5 fouls. 4 of which were for obstruction, where I was too close when
marking a player, this will be an area of which I should improve. Overall, by reviewing this table and looking at what I
was successful and unsuccessful at, I can begin to draw conclusions and define what my strengths and weaknesses are.
After fitness training in these specific areas of improvement, hopefully my next notational analysis on myself will have
improved.
DC PE Department Unit 2 starter pack
7. Training Analysis
Introduction:
From my self analysis in the Notational Sector I have Fitness Test Result (Average)
deduced the aspects of training that I could focus on which
would help me to improve my performance overall, in
Sit and Reach Test 27
competition and generally. The ones that I selected to target
would be flexibility, as it seems to me that flexibility helps Sit Up Bleep Test 8.5
a rider stay supple and balanced and also muscular Standing Stork 22 seconds
endurance as I have noticed fatigue in previous Hand Grip 26
competitions and lessons and wish to become more Ruler Drop 15
enduring. I tested myself in the components of fitness (see
table at end of page and results table; right) as the majority of my results were average I aim to improve
it to a standard of excellence or above average.
Why?
I wish to improve my riding technique generally and I want to ensure the efficiency of my performance
in competitions. If increasing my fitness and the components, such as reaction time to see a stride and
then muscular strength to collect and hold the horse under control, will help me then I want to be able
to improve.
How?
I plan to follow training sessions such as circuit training circuits which can focus on all the components
I wish to improve (mainly muscular endurance and flexibility) but also I can isolate one component and
work solely to develop that around the whole body. This would be very useful for flexibility and
muscular endurance as horse riding uses core strength and arm muscle endurance. I will also follow an
8 week program which is done on horseback and although this improves me and the horse’s
components it will come in very useful and be noticeable in competitions.
Goals
In my final fitness testing I hope to be above average or excellent. I will then in my final notation see if
the results have paid any assistance and improved my performance.
Example as to how you may structure your
training analysis introduction. Information
will come from fitness tests and your
notation.
DC PE Department Unit 2 starter pack
8. Session review: Session review:
Strengths Weaknesses
1. Splits were better this week than last 1. Began to fatigue the second time around
week, slightly further down
2. Second time round I put my knees on the floor
2. Bicep Curls were quick and efficient during my push ups as I was very tired and my arms
were slightly aching.
3. Lunges were strong and consistent for the
full time frame 3. Need to make lunges slightly harder so plan to use
weights on this circuit next time
Evaluation: (Goal Setting/Targets)
1. Physiological - This session focused mainly on my flexibility and muscular endurance as well as
core strength in activities such as the plank. I was working at an aerobic energy level but fatigued
quite quickly due to the decrease in resting time in between each station.
2. Psychological - I felt that this session tested my body’s ability to rest quickly and to recover
quickly I was quite focused and hard working and left feeling relaxed.
3. Tactical – Iwould apply this in a competition by flexibility to allow movement in balance with
the horse and core strength to maintain centre of balance and stability. Muscular endurance would
also play a key feature as all the muscles are working against a high force over a period of time.
4. Technical – In this session I used all of my antagonistic muscle pairs as the quadriceps and
hamstrings, abdominals and spinal erectors, shins and calves, biceps and triceps and forearm
flexors and extensors all feature as needed for the movements being performed.
5. Overall from this session I think that I worked myself at a higher level and will continue to
keep the timing of each station and rest station the same as I don’t want to fatigue too much
and I feel this is enough to efficiently train for horse riding as a sport.
Tutor / Coach Signed: Date:
Notice how the evaluation is more reflective
and detailed.
DC PE Department Unit 2 starter pack
9. Tactical analysis
This piece of work is an all-encompassing look at how you approach your sport from a tactical perspective.
You have an opportunity to show all your in depth knowledge of your sport and analyse how you play compared to elite
performers.
This piece of work is to be completed as a word document, not as a PowerPoint. You can still include pictures as
necessary to demonstrate different strategies you or your team may employ.
You need to include the following:
Definition of tactics & strategies, including the differences between them
Rules of your sport
Positions (where applicable), any specific rules due to positions
Aspects of attacking play
Aspects of defensive play These are the biggest areas of the work; go into as much depth as
Set plays (where applicable) possible.
Tactics / strategies when losing Always refer to your own team’s tactics / strategies throughout
Tactics / strategies when winning
Tactics against a particularly strong opposition
Personal tactics you may try to employ in your overall performance
Tactics in different weather environments (where applicable)
Tactics / strategies compared to a particular elite team e.g. England
Physical conditioning (somatotypes in your positions, when type of training you would have to undertake,
components of fitness you should focus on, how you should approach your nutritional aspects)
This is not an exhaustive list, if you have more to add then make sure you do so.
DC PE Department Unit 2 starter pack