www.earnperhit.com/essay => Professional academic writing [Help Writing]
www.Lucky-Bet.site => Bet on Sports - 50% Deposit Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/casino => Online Casino - 5000$ Welcome Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/lotto247 => Lotto247 - Win Big, Live Free
www.Lucky-Bet.site/eurobet => Best European Bookmaker
Presentation given at the CSUN Conference 2011, San Diego, CA on Universal Design for Learning and web-based tools.
it is the students themselves who demonstrate higher thinking skills and creativity through such activities searching for information, organizing and synthesizing ideas, creating presentations, and the like.
Intro to PBL and what makes an effective problem #openeducationwkMathieu Plourde
Slides used by Mark Serva during the Open Education Week webinar called "An Open Repository for Problem-Based Learning" on March 10, 2016. Recording available on Youtube https://youtu.be/RrWdt2a1fAM
PBL@UD: http://www.udel.edu/inst
This presentation is geared towards providing an overview on PjBL and on giving a practical example on how this instructional approach or strategy was used to teach mobile app development to K-12 students in a blended learning environment.
Intro presentation for Dr. Brian Housand's presentation on The 4 C's of Gifted Education and Technology at DISCOVER! Purdue University - June 22-25, 2009
Bridging professional learning, doing and innovation through making epistemic...Lina Markauskaite
Bridging professional learning, doing and innovation through making epistemic artefacts
Lina Markauskaite and Peter Goodyear
Centre for Research on Learning and Innovation
Presented at the Practice-Based Education Summit “Bridging Practice Spaces” @ CSU, Sydney 13-14 April, 2016
Abstract
Professional learning and assessment in higher education often involve production of various artefacts, such as lesson plans and reflections in teaching, assessment reports and case studies in counselling, drawings and portfolios in architecture. What is the nature of the artefacts that students produce during their professional learning? How does students’ work on making these artefacts help them to bridge knowledge learnt in university setting with knowledge work in workplaces?
In this presentation we report on our research in which we combine socio-cultural “mediation” (Kaptelinin, 2005), socio-material “objectual practice” (Knorr Cetina, 2001) and extended ecological cognition perspectives (Ingold, 2012; Knappett, 2010) to investigate the nature of learning activities in the overlapping spaces of the university and the workplace. Specifically, we investigate the nature of the artefacts that students create as a part of assessment tasks during their preparation for professional practice.
Initially, we argue that learning in university settings and doing in workplaces are two distinct kinds of objectual practices that are inherently directed towards different kinds of objects. We unpack the nature of these two kinds of objectual practices by distinguishing between object as motive and object as material entity. Specifically, We show that university learning orients itself towards abstract forms of knowledge that can travel across diverse workplace contexts and situations, while workplace practices orient themselves towards production of concrete situated solutions of specific professional problems.
Then, we look at the nature of activities and artefacts produced by students during preparation for work placements in the overlapping space of the university and the workplace., what kinds of epistemic experiences these artefacts afford and what their relationships with professional knowledge and knowing practices are. We show that these artefact-oriented activities, and the artefacts produced, often connect, rather than separate, abstract knowledge and objects of professional practice with embodied skill through concrete, materially expressed, actions and things . This entangled epistemic nature of professional learning artefacts allows bridging not only learning and work, but also learning and innovation. To make this argument we distinguish between different kinds of epistemic artefacts that students create – showing the ways in which they elucidate, preserve, transfer, fine-tune, mediate and advance upon professional knowledge and skills.
it is the students themselves who demonstrate higher thinking skills and creativity through such activities searching for information, organizing and synthesizing ideas, creating presentations, and the like.
Intro to PBL and what makes an effective problem #openeducationwkMathieu Plourde
Slides used by Mark Serva during the Open Education Week webinar called "An Open Repository for Problem-Based Learning" on March 10, 2016. Recording available on Youtube https://youtu.be/RrWdt2a1fAM
PBL@UD: http://www.udel.edu/inst
This presentation is geared towards providing an overview on PjBL and on giving a practical example on how this instructional approach or strategy was used to teach mobile app development to K-12 students in a blended learning environment.
Intro presentation for Dr. Brian Housand's presentation on The 4 C's of Gifted Education and Technology at DISCOVER! Purdue University - June 22-25, 2009
Bridging professional learning, doing and innovation through making epistemic...Lina Markauskaite
Bridging professional learning, doing and innovation through making epistemic artefacts
Lina Markauskaite and Peter Goodyear
Centre for Research on Learning and Innovation
Presented at the Practice-Based Education Summit “Bridging Practice Spaces” @ CSU, Sydney 13-14 April, 2016
Abstract
Professional learning and assessment in higher education often involve production of various artefacts, such as lesson plans and reflections in teaching, assessment reports and case studies in counselling, drawings and portfolios in architecture. What is the nature of the artefacts that students produce during their professional learning? How does students’ work on making these artefacts help them to bridge knowledge learnt in university setting with knowledge work in workplaces?
In this presentation we report on our research in which we combine socio-cultural “mediation” (Kaptelinin, 2005), socio-material “objectual practice” (Knorr Cetina, 2001) and extended ecological cognition perspectives (Ingold, 2012; Knappett, 2010) to investigate the nature of learning activities in the overlapping spaces of the university and the workplace. Specifically, we investigate the nature of the artefacts that students create as a part of assessment tasks during their preparation for professional practice.
Initially, we argue that learning in university settings and doing in workplaces are two distinct kinds of objectual practices that are inherently directed towards different kinds of objects. We unpack the nature of these two kinds of objectual practices by distinguishing between object as motive and object as material entity. Specifically, We show that university learning orients itself towards abstract forms of knowledge that can travel across diverse workplace contexts and situations, while workplace practices orient themselves towards production of concrete situated solutions of specific professional problems.
Then, we look at the nature of activities and artefacts produced by students during preparation for work placements in the overlapping space of the university and the workplace., what kinds of epistemic experiences these artefacts afford and what their relationships with professional knowledge and knowing practices are. We show that these artefact-oriented activities, and the artefacts produced, often connect, rather than separate, abstract knowledge and objects of professional practice with embodied skill through concrete, materially expressed, actions and things . This entangled epistemic nature of professional learning artefacts allows bridging not only learning and work, but also learning and innovation. To make this argument we distinguish between different kinds of epistemic artefacts that students create – showing the ways in which they elucidate, preserve, transfer, fine-tune, mediate and advance upon professional knowledge and skills.
Teaching people to think and work across disciplinary and professional bounda...Lina Markauskaite
Teaching people to think and work across disciplinary and professional boundaries
Organisers and invited discussants: Lina Markauskaite, Peter Goodyear, Marie Carroll, Tina Hinton, Philip Poronnik, Kim Bell-Anderson, Simon Poon
TIME: 11:00-11:45am, Thursday 5, November, STL Research Fest 2015
Developing students’ capacities to work in multidisciplinary teams, communicate effectively with people across traditional professional boundaries, and solve complex real-world issues are a priority area for future enhancements of university teaching. But what is really involved? What kinds of capacities do students actually need for working effectively across disciplinary and professional boundaries? What kinds of interdisciplinary teaching and learning models are effective? What kinds of teaching and learning approaches are most productive for enhancing students’ capacities? How can we validly and effectively assess students’ mastery of various interdisciplinary skills?
In this session, we will share some insights from recent research and teaching, as a stimulus to discussing experiences and practical action in this space. If there is sufficient support, we envisage forming an action research group to collaborate in innovative educational R&D over the next few years.
If you are interested in this challenging area but can’t attend the event, please send us an email and we will keep you informed.
Epistemic fluency perspectives in teaching and learning practice: Learning to...Lina Markauskaite
Summary
Capacities to drive collective learning, address jointly complex practical challenges and create innovative solutions are seen essential for future graduates. How to prepare students to lead complex collaborative learning, change and innovation projects? How to assist them to develop knowledge and skills needed for resourceful teamwork with other people who have different expertises, experiences, and interests?
Systems, Change and Learning is a blended graduate course in the Maters of the Learning Sciences and Technology program that aims to develop students’ capacities to lead complex organisational learning and educational innovation projects. Rooted in systems theories, cybernetics and the learning sciences, this course: 1) introduces students to the theoretical approaches and methods for understanding complexity, facilitating individual learning and managing change, and 2) provides them with practical experiences to engage in systems inquiry and collaborative innovation design projects.
The course draws on the second-order pedagogy and grants students’ agency to design not only the innovation, but also their own learning and innovation process and environment. Students choose complex real life organisational learning or educational change challenges and, over the course of the semester, work in small innovation teams by analysing an encountered problematical situation, modelling possible scenarios and developing innovative solutions. As a result, each team creates a practical guide for Change and Innovation Managers who will be tasked with implementing the proposed innovation in an organisational setting.
The main emphasis is on fostering expansive learning and deliberative innovation culture trough cultivating systems thinking, design practice and responsive action. Through engaging in systemic inquiry, innovation design tasks and authentic teamwork, students develop a number of graduate attributes that are critical for joint learning and knowledge-informed, responsive action in modern workplaces, such as analytical and integrative thinking, effective teamwork, multidisciplinary and intercultural competencies.
Evaluations show that this course promotes deep student engagement and brings about transformative learning experiences. It is now offered as an elective in two other interdisciplinary masters programs.
Teaching people to think and work across disciplinary and professional bounda...Lina Markauskaite
Teaching people to think and work across disciplinary and professional boundaries
Organisers and invited discussants: Lina Markauskaite, Peter Goodyear, Marie Carroll, Tina Hinton, Philip Poronnik, Kim Bell-Anderson, Simon Poon
TIME: 11:00-11:45am, Thursday 5, November, STL Research Fest 2015
Developing students’ capacities to work in multidisciplinary teams, communicate effectively with people across traditional professional boundaries, and solve complex real-world issues are a priority area for future enhancements of university teaching. But what is really involved? What kinds of capacities do students actually need for working effectively across disciplinary and professional boundaries? What kinds of interdisciplinary teaching and learning models are effective? What kinds of teaching and learning approaches are most productive for enhancing students’ capacities? How can we validly and effectively assess students’ mastery of various interdisciplinary skills?
In this session, we will share some insights from recent research and teaching, as a stimulus to discussing experiences and practical action in this space. If there is sufficient support, we envisage forming an action research group to collaborate in innovative educational R&D over the next few years.
If you are interested in this challenging area but can’t attend the event, please send us an email and we will keep you informed.
Epistemic fluency perspectives in teaching and learning practice: Learning to...Lina Markauskaite
Summary
Capacities to drive collective learning, address jointly complex practical challenges and create innovative solutions are seen essential for future graduates. How to prepare students to lead complex collaborative learning, change and innovation projects? How to assist them to develop knowledge and skills needed for resourceful teamwork with other people who have different expertises, experiences, and interests?
Systems, Change and Learning is a blended graduate course in the Maters of the Learning Sciences and Technology program that aims to develop students’ capacities to lead complex organisational learning and educational innovation projects. Rooted in systems theories, cybernetics and the learning sciences, this course: 1) introduces students to the theoretical approaches and methods for understanding complexity, facilitating individual learning and managing change, and 2) provides them with practical experiences to engage in systems inquiry and collaborative innovation design projects.
The course draws on the second-order pedagogy and grants students’ agency to design not only the innovation, but also their own learning and innovation process and environment. Students choose complex real life organisational learning or educational change challenges and, over the course of the semester, work in small innovation teams by analysing an encountered problematical situation, modelling possible scenarios and developing innovative solutions. As a result, each team creates a practical guide for Change and Innovation Managers who will be tasked with implementing the proposed innovation in an organisational setting.
The main emphasis is on fostering expansive learning and deliberative innovation culture trough cultivating systems thinking, design practice and responsive action. Through engaging in systemic inquiry, innovation design tasks and authentic teamwork, students develop a number of graduate attributes that are critical for joint learning and knowledge-informed, responsive action in modern workplaces, such as analytical and integrative thinking, effective teamwork, multidisciplinary and intercultural competencies.
Evaluations show that this course promotes deep student engagement and brings about transformative learning experiences. It is now offered as an elective in two other interdisciplinary masters programs.
Empowering student learning through sustained inquiryJune Wall
Implementing a BYOD program at your school is only the beginning of a journey that should change teaching and learning. A personal device will only make a difference if the implementation includes pedagogical and curriculum review that focusses on inquiry learning and enables individualisation. This session outlines an implementation that incorporates an approach to inquiry learning through a lens of the Australian Curriculum.
A presentation targeted for Kansas Technology Rich Classroom teachers at a summer conference (2011) who are trying to manage PBL amid the infusion of the Common Core, MTSS, TRC, 21st Century Skills and so on.
How to Plan a OBE Lesson incorporating ICT to support aspects of Learning & Thinking
In the Classroom by Ceanlia Vermeulen attending the
INNOVATE 2008 SCHOOLS’ ICT CONFERENCE
CAPE TOWN 1-3 OCTOBER 2008
Providing learning and reflection opportunities to develop in-service CS teac...Mark Guzdial
Meeting the Challenges of Growing CS Teaching:
How we provide opportunities to in-service teachers for reflection with feedback?
Disciplinary Commons for Computing Education provides one model with an emphasis on community.
How do we influence the development of CS teacher identity?
The important factors we can influence are (a) a teacher community and (b) clear definitions of what is CS.
How do we provide Computer Science and Computer Science PCK learning opportunities in-service?
We are building and testing an ebook to meet teachers’ needs.
ASCA's Mindsets and Behaviors competencies are excellent benchmarks to ensure student success in academics, careers, and social/emotional pursuits, but can be a lot for counselors and educators to take on. Learn how AchieveWORKS can personalize the ASCA competencies for students. AchieveWORKS assessments can make learning personalized by identifying focus areas so that students take ownership of the competencies they need most.
Implication of the New Normal needs to be understood by decoding the Triangular Classroom. The PPT gives you an overview of some key strategies and approaches
The Next Generation of Differentiation: The Path to More Powerful Personaliza...DreamBox Learning
As education continues to change, so does our definition of differentiation. In this edWebinar, Madeline Ahearn, Curriculum Administrator in Eugene School District 4J in Oregon, and Kelly Urlacher, Senior Curriculum Designer at DreamBox Learning, explore how personalization has evolved in her district and how new innovative technologies have supported increased opportunities to personalize learning.
www.earnperhit.com/essay => Professional academic writing [Help Writing]
www.Lucky-Bet.site => Bet on Sports - 50% Deposit Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/casino => Online Casino - 5000$ Welcome Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/lotto247 => Lotto247 - Win Big, Live Free
www.Lucky-Bet.site/eurobet => Best European Bookmaker
Slide show for the ATCNE 2017 QIAT session
www.earnperhit.com/essay => Professional academic writing [Help Writing]
www.Lucky-Bet.site => Bet on Sports - 50% Deposit Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/casino => Online Casino - 5000$ Welcome Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/lotto247 => Lotto247 - Win Big, Live Free
www.Lucky-Bet.site/eurobet => Best European Bookmaker
MADA AT presentation with case studies
www.earnperhit.com/essay => Professional academic writing
www.Lucky-Bet.site => Bet on Sports - 50% Deposit Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/casino => Online Casino - 5000$ Welcome Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/lotto247 => Lotto247 - Win Big, Live Free
www.Lucky-Bet.site/eurobet => Best European Bookmaker
MADA AT for learning, organization and math.
www.earnperhit.com/essay => Professional academic writing [Help Writing]
www.Lucky-Bet.site => Bet on Sports - 50% Deposit Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/casino => Online Casino - 5000$ Welcome Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/lotto247 => Lotto247 - Win Big, Live Free
www.Lucky-Bet.site/eurobet => Best European Bookmaker
Assistive Technology for MADA - Vision and Hearing
www.earnperhit.com/essay => Professional academic writing
www.Lucky-Bet.site => Bet on Sports - 50% Deposit Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/casino => Online Casino - 5000$ Welcome Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/lotto247 => Lotto247 - Win Big, Live Free
www.Lucky-Bet.site/eurobet => Best European Bookmaker
AIM for AT Bootcamp
Alternative computer access and the writing process notes
UDL_ CSUN_2011
1. CSUN, March 2011 Universally-Designed Tools and Strategies for Struggling Students Kirk D. Behnke, M.Ed., ATP kbehnke@esc4.net Cecilia Robinson crobinson@esc4.net
13. Good instruction is essential Good teachers are giving good instruction Good teachers are building in flexibility Good teachers are trying new ways Good teachers are listening Good teachers are giving up control Many good teachers are already using UDL, but they don’t know it.
20. It’s a different world for our students http://earth.google.com/images/index-earth_lg.jpg
21. Bring in the 21st century digital native to teach the digital immigrant UDL
22. UDL provides a blueprint for creating instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments that work for everyone--not a single, one-size-fits-all solution but rather flexible approaches that can be customized and adjusted for individual needs.
30. Three Brain Networks: Recognition How we gather facts and categorize what we see, hear, and read. Identifying letters, words, or an author's style are recognition tasks.
31. Three Brain Networks: Strategic Planning and performing tasks. How we organize and express our ideas. Writing an essay or solving a math problem are strategic tasks.
32. Three Brain Networks: Affective How learners get engaged and stay motivated. How they are challenged, excited, or interested. These are affective dimensions.