The information literacy of college students: gender influences on information source selection - Heather Dalal
1. The Information Literacy of
College Students: Gender
Influences on Information
Source Selection
Librarians’ Information Literacy Annual Conference
Arthur Taylor, Associate Professor, Information Systems and Supply Chain
Management, College of Business Administration
Heather Dalal, Assistant Professor-Librarian, Moore Library
University
College Dublin
Library
21-23 March
2016
2. Previous Research: Students’
Evaluative Behaviors
Students are familiar with However in practice
Source: http://academictimgunn.tumblr.com/
Authority
Accuracy
Credibility
Reliability
Objectivity
Validity
Timeliness
Bias/Point of View
Source:pixabay
3. Previous Research:
Demographic Differences
Source: UI8.net
Males are more likely to
- use newspapers &
magazines
- use free &
nontraditional
sources
Females are more
likely to
• - use books &
journals
- use licensed
library sources
4. Previous Research:
Demographic Differences
Source: UI8.net
Males are more likely to
- be more confident in
their ability to search
- not ask for help
Females are more
likely to
- be anxious at the
start of research
- evaluate their skills
lower
5. Our questions
* Do students understand
evaluative criteria?
* Do they apply the criteria?
* Do demographics influence
their evaluation knowledge &
habits? Source: pixabay
7. Results
We used in group percentages and chi-
squared analysis of variance on tabular
results.
Many results were statistically significant -
strengthening our evidence of gender bias
in this sample.
9. How often have you used research tools
beyond Google for research papers in the
last year?
Images Source: http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2012/gender-divide-reaching-male-vs-female-millennials.html
never
2% of Females 11% males
almost always
30 % of females 20 % of males
10. Females in our sample
Source: UI8.net
* more discerning in
evaluating
* used a number of
criteria in evaluating
* more likely to use
sources beyond
Google or Ask.com
* more likely to use
library databases
11. Males in our sample
Source: UI8.net
*more confident they
could determine
- the author of a site
- the qualifications of
the author
* more likely to believe
search engine results were
accurate, credible, &
objective
•
12. Discussion
Source: UI8.net
Did some male students
not feel the need
evaluate because pages
returned by a search
engine are objective,
credible, and accurate?
Are females more
careful searchers?
Are females are
socialized in a way to
make more effort in
their schoolwork?
13. Library anxiety
This research confirms & extends gender
specific findings related to library anxiety
(Blundell & Lambert, 2014).
Males more comfortable using the library.
Females perceive librarians are not helpful.
http://library.movlic.com/CheckItOut/
10/EasingLibraryAnxiety
14. Implications for IL Instruction:
understanding our students
To teach better:
understand your
users’ needs and
beliefs
offer a gender-aware
approach to
information literacy
instruction Source: http://friendsofebonie.com/
15. Implications for teaching females
Encourage to take
intellectual risks.
Increase self-
efficacy.
Reassure that they
are capable.
16. Implications for teaching males
Stress the limitations
of commercial search
engines.
Stress the need for
careful evaluation.
Focus on the meaning
of these criteria. Source: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/05/the-confidence-gap/359815/
17. Association for College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information Literacy Competency
Standards for Higher Education. Chicago: American Library Association.
Blundell, S., & Lambert, F. (2014). Information anxiety from the undergraduate student
perspective: a pilot study of second-semester freshmen. Journal of Education for Library
and Information Science, 55(4), 261.
Burdick, T. A. (1996). Success and Diversity in Information Seeking: Gender and the
Information Search Styles Model. School Library Media Quarterly, 25(1), 19–26.
Fields, A. M. (2001). Women’s epistemological development: Implications for undergraduate
information literacy instruction. Research Strategies, 18(3), 227–238.
Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: the role of
gender*. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432–448.
References
18. Lim, S., & Kwon, N. (2010). Gender differences in information behavior concerning Wikipedia, an
unorthodox information source? Library & Information Science Research, 32(3), 212–220.
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of
information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education, 41(3), 271–290.
Kay, K. and Shipman, C. “The Confidence Gap,” The Atlantic Monthly 313, no. 4 (2014): 56–66.
Steinerová, J., & Susol, J. (2007). Users’ information behaviour-a gender perspective.
Information Research, 12(3), 13.
Taylor, Arthur & Heather A. Dalal. (2016). Gender and Information Literacy: Evaluation of
Gender Differences in a Student Survey of Information Sources. College & Research
Libraries. Forthcoming.
Taylor, Arthur & Heather A. Dalal. (2014). Information Literacy Standards and the World Wide
Web: Results from a Student Survey on Evaluation of Internet Information
Sources. Information Research. 19(4).
- take a safe approach to research Burdick, 1996; Hargittai & Shafer, 2006; Li & Kirkup, 2007
- express uneasiness & anxiety at the start of their research process Fallows, 2005; Steinerová & Susol, 2007
- send more time investigating and formulating topics Burdick, 1996
evaluate their skills lower than males Burdick, 1996
be more confident in their ability to search for information on the Internet Burdick, 1996; Hargittai & Shafer, 2006; Li & Kirkup, 2007
- focus on gathering info Burdick 1996
- complete their research faster Burdick 1996
- not ask for help Burdick 1996
- be confident in their search Fallows, 2005; Steinerová & Susol, 2007
The survey questions were based on the ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education published in 2000.
Questions were based primarily on Standard 3 which addresses how an information literate student performs critical evaluation of information sources.
Several survey questions were used to gather background information about the subject including their college major and gender.
The remaining questions asked subjects about their use of information sources and their evaluation of the reliability, validity, accuracy, authority, timeliness, and point of view or bias of Internet information sources. Most questions were specifically about Internet information sources though a few questions asked about the use of library databases.
Association for College and Research Libraries, “Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education.”
Questions 1-8 demographic
Questions 9-27 mapped to ACRL IL Standards.
The survey was delivered in an online, Web-based format and results were stored anonymously in a database for later analysis (see Figure 1). There were two groups of survey subjects: one group included students whose instructors had agreed to participate in the survey, the other group was recruited through an email campaign targeted to students in the School of Education and the School of Business.
Delivered online prior to IL instruction - 348 Participants
Includes question such as
Why do you select a page?
How often to research beyond Google?
How many sources is enough for paper?
How do you determine the authority,
credibility, objectivity, etc?
Is it possible to determine these?
Do searchers consider it possible to determine these criteria for documents being evaluated?
How do searchers attempt to evaluate these criteria when evaluating information sources?
Survey based on the ACRL IL Standards
reviewed by Library Faculty
piloted by library student employees.
delivered online prior to research instruction & via email campaign to increase participants (total: 386)
The survey questions were based on the ACRL Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education published in 2000. Questions were based primarily on Standard 3 which addresses how an information literate student performs critical evaluation of information sources. Several survey questions were used to gather background information about the subject including their college major and gender. The remaining questions asked subjects about their use of information sources and their evaluation of the reliability, validity, accuracy, authority, timeliness, and point of view or bias of Internet information sources. Most questions were specifically about Internet information sources though a few questions asked about the use of library databases.
Association for College and Research Libraries, “Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education.”
Questions 1-8 demographic
Questions 9-27 mapped to ACRL IL Standards.
The survey was delivered in an online, Web-based format and results were stored anonymously in a database for later analysis (see Figure 1). There were two groups of survey subjects: one group included students whose instructors had agreed to participate in the survey, the other group was recruited through an email campaign targeted to students in the School of Education and the School of Business.
Delivered online prior to IL instruction - 348 Participants
Includes question such as
Why do you select a page?
How often to research beyond Google?
How many sources is enough for paper?
How do you determine the authority,
credibility, objectivity, etc?
Is it possible to determine these?
Do searchers consider it possible to determine these criteria for documents being evaluated?
How do searchers attempt to evaluate these criteria when evaluating information sources?
The survey questions were developed by the authors and then reviewed by library faculty. A pilot survey was performed using student workers in the library as subjects. Based on feedback from library faculty and the results of the pilot survey, the questions were refined to produce the final survey instrument.
Since there were more female survey respondents than male survey respondents there is bias in the sample towards female responses for this reason examining raw counts of survey responses would not be useful. Instead, in-group percentages (percentages of responses to a question within a group of respondents of a gender) were used.
Chi-square analysis of variance was used to examine correlation between gender and survey responses. This result is reported where the test demonstrated a statistically significant correlation. This analysis involved running the test on the raw survey counts.
Infrequently - less than 25 per cent of the time. 23 % F 23 % M
Sometimes - about 50 per cent of the time. 25 % F 24 % M
Usually - about 75 per cent of the time. 19% F 22% M
More discerning in evaluating
used a number of criteria in evaluating
more likely to use critical evaluation criteria
more likely to evaluate the currency
more likely to evaluate quality of the writing on the site
More likely to use sources beyond Google or Ask.com
more likely to use library databases.
More likely to try to find enough quality sources
More likely to evaluate the quality of the site using the URL
More willing to check with someone with knowledge about quality
More confident they could determine
* the author of a site * the qualifications of the author
More likely to believe
* search engine results were accurate and credible
* an Internet source was objective
More likely to be confused about the criteria of source currency
Less concerned with the number of sources in a paper
more likely to ignore the objectiveness of the site.
Blundell, S., & Lambert, F. (2014). Information anxiety from the undergraduate student perspective: a pilot study of second-semester freshmen. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 55(4), 261.
Burdick
Anne M. Fields, “Women’s Epistemological Development: Implications for Undergraduate Information Literacy Instruction,” Research Strategies 18, no. 3 (2001): 227–38.
Ibid.
Fields, “Self-Efficacy and the First-Year,” 545.
Shelly Blundell and Frank Lambert, “Information Anxiety from the Undergraduate Student Perspective; A Pilot Study of Second-semester Freshmen,” Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 55, no 4 (2014): 261-73.