The End of Handover
Fiatec h – Tech Tuesday Webinar
July 18, 2017
Unlocking the value of a progressive
handover approach to Information
Management
Generated By Engineering
Received By Operations
UsefulInformation
Required By Operations
The Traditional Handover Approach
OPERATE/MAINTAIN/MODIFYCOMMISSIONINGCONSTRUCTPROCURE
DETAILED
ENGINEERINGFEED
Key Handover Challenges - Ambition vs. Reality
Reason 1
Lack of a well-structured
and well-enforced plan
for information handover
Reason 2
Using inadequate information
management technologies
Reason 3
Handover is viewed as a
late stage activity
▪ Asset Integrity & Reliability
▪ Work Management
▪ Maintenance Management
▪ Asset Management
▪ Risk Management
▪ Automation Control & Monitoring
▪ Process Safety Management
100%
UNSTRUCTURED DATA
30%
STRUCTURED DATA
Who fills the gap and how?
The need to shift to a Progressive Handover approach – Operations
4.2% of capital project
for $100M = $4.2M
CFIHOS - Capital Facilities Information Hand Over Specification
• USPI-NL is the organizational owner
• Comprised of Owners, EPCs and Technology Suppliers
• Value drivers are for capital project execution and operations
• Interoperability: Drive consistency through a common specification and dictionary to reduce
costs at each step in the supply chain across the project
• Debottlenecking: Raise productivity by finding bottlenecks in design review & approval
process using status reporting on information delivery & review
• Accelerated handovers: Continuously stage and validate asset information to assure data
quality and accelerate population of operational systems
• Speed up searches for information. Reduce search time by linking documents to tags (often
quoted as 25% of operational staff time). Improve management of change for brownfield
modifications.
• Reduce operational risk. Demonstrate control over as-built data as a “minimum standard”
for asset information and a specification for data cleansing & integrated service contractors.
Generated By Engineering
UsefulInformation
OPERATE/MAINTAIN/MODIFYCOMMISSIONINGCONSTRUCTPROCURE
DETAILED
ENGINEERINGFEED
Received By OperationsRequired By Operations
Incremental
handover would
reduce cost
A better way forward – Progressive Handover
Source : AVEVA, End of
Handover Report
Digital Asset
Information
Physical Asset
Steel
Evergreen
Mechanical Integrity Data Integrity
The Digital Asset makes Progressive Handover possible
Information
Modeling
Information
Standards
Management
Written Specifications
or
Excel Spreadsheets
Governance
• Role/Responsibilities
• Access/Security Controls
• Compliance & Conformance Policies
Information Modeling
• Tags/Documents
• Attributes and UOM
• Master Reference Data
• Naming / Numbering Rules
• Lifecycle Phase Definitions
• Maturity Rules
Configuration Management
• Change Management
• Class Library Publishing
• Standards Mapping
• Data Loaders
Key capabilities required to manage Information Standards
The Digital Asset Transformation Journey
Manage the
Digital Asset
System of Context
Quality & Progress
Reporting
Project/Asset
Information Search
Engine Tag Centric
Information Retrieval
Tag-to-Doc
Cross Referencing
Multi-Project/
Asset access and
Visibility
Visualization
DigitalAssetJourney
System of Reference
Defines the
Digital AssetNumbering
Systems
Class Library/
Taxonomies
Business
Validation
Rules
Data Requirements
Specification
Data
Governance
Modal
Asset Hierarchies
Create/Modify
the Digital Asset
Systems of Record
Exploit the
Digital Asset
Systems of Engagement
Multi-player Gaming PlatformTouch Devices Mobile Devices Human Machine Devices
{ }
 
 

The End of Handover by AVEVA & Fiatech

  • 1.
    The End ofHandover Fiatec h – Tech Tuesday Webinar July 18, 2017 Unlocking the value of a progressive handover approach to Information Management
  • 2.
    Generated By Engineering ReceivedBy Operations UsefulInformation Required By Operations The Traditional Handover Approach OPERATE/MAINTAIN/MODIFYCOMMISSIONINGCONSTRUCTPROCURE DETAILED ENGINEERINGFEED
  • 3.
    Key Handover Challenges- Ambition vs. Reality Reason 1 Lack of a well-structured and well-enforced plan for information handover Reason 2 Using inadequate information management technologies Reason 3 Handover is viewed as a late stage activity
  • 4.
    ▪ Asset Integrity& Reliability ▪ Work Management ▪ Maintenance Management ▪ Asset Management ▪ Risk Management ▪ Automation Control & Monitoring ▪ Process Safety Management 100% UNSTRUCTURED DATA 30% STRUCTURED DATA Who fills the gap and how? The need to shift to a Progressive Handover approach – Operations 4.2% of capital project for $100M = $4.2M
  • 5.
    CFIHOS - CapitalFacilities Information Hand Over Specification • USPI-NL is the organizational owner • Comprised of Owners, EPCs and Technology Suppliers • Value drivers are for capital project execution and operations • Interoperability: Drive consistency through a common specification and dictionary to reduce costs at each step in the supply chain across the project • Debottlenecking: Raise productivity by finding bottlenecks in design review & approval process using status reporting on information delivery & review • Accelerated handovers: Continuously stage and validate asset information to assure data quality and accelerate population of operational systems • Speed up searches for information. Reduce search time by linking documents to tags (often quoted as 25% of operational staff time). Improve management of change for brownfield modifications. • Reduce operational risk. Demonstrate control over as-built data as a “minimum standard” for asset information and a specification for data cleansing & integrated service contractors.
  • 6.
    Generated By Engineering UsefulInformation OPERATE/MAINTAIN/MODIFYCOMMISSIONINGCONSTRUCTPROCURE DETAILED ENGINEERINGFEED ReceivedBy OperationsRequired By Operations Incremental handover would reduce cost A better way forward – Progressive Handover Source : AVEVA, End of Handover Report
  • 7.
    Digital Asset Information Physical Asset Steel Evergreen MechanicalIntegrity Data Integrity The Digital Asset makes Progressive Handover possible
  • 8.
    Information Modeling Information Standards Management Written Specifications or Excel Spreadsheets Governance •Role/Responsibilities • Access/Security Controls • Compliance & Conformance Policies Information Modeling • Tags/Documents • Attributes and UOM • Master Reference Data • Naming / Numbering Rules • Lifecycle Phase Definitions • Maturity Rules Configuration Management • Change Management • Class Library Publishing • Standards Mapping • Data Loaders Key capabilities required to manage Information Standards
  • 9.
    The Digital AssetTransformation Journey Manage the Digital Asset System of Context Quality & Progress Reporting Project/Asset Information Search Engine Tag Centric Information Retrieval Tag-to-Doc Cross Referencing Multi-Project/ Asset access and Visibility Visualization DigitalAssetJourney System of Reference Defines the Digital AssetNumbering Systems Class Library/ Taxonomies Business Validation Rules Data Requirements Specification Data Governance Modal Asset Hierarchies Create/Modify the Digital Asset Systems of Record Exploit the Digital Asset Systems of Engagement Multi-player Gaming PlatformTouch Devices Mobile Devices Human Machine Devices
  • 10.