A SERVEY OF ROUTING
PROTOCOLS IN MANET
K.JAGANATHAN
Mtech-CSE
Indian institute of information technology -srirangam
INTRODUCTION
 MANET is the short form of Mobile Ad hoc
Network.
 Ad hoc is a Latin phrase meaning "for this".
 It is completely similar to Ad hoc Network
except for its nodes are mobile devices
connected by wireless.
 MANETs are a kind of Wireless Ad hoc
Network that usually has a routable networking
environment on top of a Link Layer Ad hoc
Network.
ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN
MANETS
 Proactive protocols
 Traditional distributed shortest-path protocols
 Maintain routes between every host pair at all times
 Based on periodic updates; High routing overhead
 Example: DSDV (destination sequenced distance vector)
 Reactive protocols
 Determine route if and when needed
 Source initiates route discovery
 Example: DSR (dynamic source routing)
 Hybrid protocols
 Adaptive; Combination of proactive and reactive
 Example : ZRP (zone routing protocol)
ROUTING PROTOCOLS
 Proactive protocols
 DSDV was one of the early algorithms
available.
 § creating ad hoc networks with
 Small number of nodes.
 Disadvantage
 DSDV requires a regular update of its routing
tables, which Uses up battery power and a small
amount of bandwidth even when the network is
idle.
REACTIVE PROTOCOLS
 The main advantage of this protocol is that
routes are established on demand and destination
sequence numbers are used to find the latest
route to the destination.
 Disadvantage
 The disadvantage of this protocol is that the
route maintenance mechanism does not
locally repair a broken link.
HYBRID ROUTING
 It reduces the control traffic produced by
periodic flooding of routing
information packets (proactive scheme).
 · It reduces the wastage of bandwidth and
control overhead compared to reactive
schemes.
 Disadvantage
 The large overlapping of routing zones
 Central nodes have an extra burden because they
need to have enough memory to store
information about all nodes in the network
CHALLENGES IN MANET ROUTING
 Auto configuration issues
 Address assignment
 Service discovery
 Security issues
 Ease of denial-of-service attack
 Misbehaving nodes difficult to identify
 Nodes can be easily compromised
 New Applications/services
 Location based: Distribute some information to all nodes in a
geographic area
 Content based: Query all sensors that sensed something particular in
the past hour
PROPOSED SYSTEM
 Conventional wired-type schemes (global
routing, proactive):
 Distance Vector; Link State
 Hierarchical (global routing) schemes:
 Fisheye, Hierarchical State Routing, Landmark
Routing
 On- Demand, reactive routing:
 Source routing; backward learning
 Location Assisted routing (Geo-routing):
 DREAM, LAR etc
THANK YOU
THANK YOU

survey of manet protocols

  • 1.
    A SERVEY OFROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MANET K.JAGANATHAN Mtech-CSE Indian institute of information technology -srirangam
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION  MANET isthe short form of Mobile Ad hoc Network.  Ad hoc is a Latin phrase meaning "for this".  It is completely similar to Ad hoc Network except for its nodes are mobile devices connected by wireless.  MANETs are a kind of Wireless Ad hoc Network that usually has a routable networking environment on top of a Link Layer Ad hoc Network.
  • 3.
    ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MANETS Proactive protocols  Traditional distributed shortest-path protocols  Maintain routes between every host pair at all times  Based on periodic updates; High routing overhead  Example: DSDV (destination sequenced distance vector)  Reactive protocols  Determine route if and when needed  Source initiates route discovery  Example: DSR (dynamic source routing)  Hybrid protocols  Adaptive; Combination of proactive and reactive  Example : ZRP (zone routing protocol)
  • 4.
    ROUTING PROTOCOLS  Proactiveprotocols  DSDV was one of the early algorithms available.  § creating ad hoc networks with  Small number of nodes.  Disadvantage  DSDV requires a regular update of its routing tables, which Uses up battery power and a small amount of bandwidth even when the network is idle.
  • 5.
    REACTIVE PROTOCOLS  Themain advantage of this protocol is that routes are established on demand and destination sequence numbers are used to find the latest route to the destination.  Disadvantage  The disadvantage of this protocol is that the route maintenance mechanism does not locally repair a broken link.
  • 6.
    HYBRID ROUTING  Itreduces the control traffic produced by periodic flooding of routing information packets (proactive scheme).  · It reduces the wastage of bandwidth and control overhead compared to reactive schemes.  Disadvantage  The large overlapping of routing zones  Central nodes have an extra burden because they need to have enough memory to store information about all nodes in the network
  • 7.
    CHALLENGES IN MANETROUTING  Auto configuration issues  Address assignment  Service discovery  Security issues  Ease of denial-of-service attack  Misbehaving nodes difficult to identify  Nodes can be easily compromised  New Applications/services  Location based: Distribute some information to all nodes in a geographic area  Content based: Query all sensors that sensed something particular in the past hour
  • 8.
    PROPOSED SYSTEM  Conventionalwired-type schemes (global routing, proactive):  Distance Vector; Link State  Hierarchical (global routing) schemes:  Fisheye, Hierarchical State Routing, Landmark Routing  On- Demand, reactive routing:  Source routing; backward learning  Location Assisted routing (Geo-routing):  DREAM, LAR etc
  • 9.
  • 10.