This document discusses recent management of surgical site infections. It begins with an introduction on the history and types of surgical infections. It then defines surgical site infections and classifies them as superficial, deep or organ/space infections. Risk factors for surgical site infections include patient factors like diabetes as well as surgical factors like procedure type and duration. Recent management involves measures to prevent infections like controlling blood sugar, administering prophylactic antibiotics appropriately, and maintaining normothermia in the operating room. For treating existing infections, strategies include opening and draining wounds along with targeted antibiotic therapy only in significant infections. The document also discusses sepsis, a serious complication, and its immune mediated pathophysiology as well as approaches for assessment and management.
A discussion on the risk factors, classification and clinical presentation of surgical site infection. Also elucidates the overview of management approach to SSI.
Surgical site Infection during Internship in medical college.pptxrautkrisna
Infections that occur in the wound created by an invasive surgical procedure are generally referred to as surgical site infections (SSIs). SSIs are one of the most important causes of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs). A prevalence survey undertaken in 2006 suggested that approximately 8% of patients in hospital in the UK have an HCAI. SSIs accounted for 14% of these infections and nearly 5% of patients who had undergone a surgical procedure were found to have developed an SSI. However, prevalence studies tend to underestimate SSI because many of these infections occur after the patient has been discharged from hospital. SSIs are associated with considerable morbidity and it has been reported that over one-third of postoperative deaths are related, at least in part, to SSI. However, it is important to recognise that SSIs can range from a relatively trivial wound discharge with no other complications to a life-threatening condition. Other clinical outcomes of SSIs include poor scars that are cosmetically unacceptable, such as those that are spreading, hypertrophic or keloid, persistent pain and itching, restriction of movement, particularly when over joints, and a significant impact on emotional wellbeing. SSI can double the length of time a patient stays in hospital and thereby increase the costs of health care. Additional costs attributable to SSI of between 814 and 6626 have been reported depending on the type of surgery and the severity of the infection. The main additional costs are related to re-operation, extra nursing care and interventions, and drug treatment costs. The indirect costs, due to loss of productivity, patient dissatisfaction and litigation, and reduced quality of life, have been studied less extensively.Infections that occur in the wound created by an invasive surgical procedure are generally referred to as surgical site infections (SSIs). SSIs are one of the most important causes of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs). A prevalence survey undertaken in 2006 suggested that approximately 8% of patients in hospital in the UK have an HCAI. SSIs accounted for 14% of these infections and nearly 5% of patients who had undergone a surgical procedure were found to have developed an SSI. However, prevalence studies tend to underestimate SSI because many of these infections occur after the patient has been discharged from hospital. SSIs are associated with considerable morbidity and it has been reported that over one-third of postoperative deaths are related, at least in part, to SSI. However, it is important to recognise that SSIs can range from a relatively trivial wound discharge with no other complications to a life-threatening condition. Other clinical outcomes of SSIs include poor scars that are cosmetically unacceptable, such as those that are spreading, hypertrophic or keloid, persistent pain and itching, restriction of movement, particularly when over joints, and a significant impact on emotional wllbeing
DOI:10.21276/ijlssr.2016.2.4.1
ABSTRACT- Introduction: Surgical Site Infections (SSI) still remains a significant problem following an operation
and the third most frequently reported nosocomial infections. SSI contributes significantly to increased health care costs in
terms of prolonged hospital stay and lost work days.
Objective: The current study was undertaken to identify incidence of SSI and the risk factors associated with it, and the
common organism isolated and its antibiotic sensitivity and resistance.
Material and Methods: A total number of 3211 patients admitted in general surgical wards for elective surgery in the
study period, out of which 1225 were clean and clean contaminated cases, fulfilling our study criteria. Totally 56 cases
had surgical site infections which had been taken up for this study. Wound discharges were sent for culture and sensitivity.
Results and Conclusions: The overall infection rate was 4.57%. The SSI rate was almost equal in clean surgeries and
clean contaminated ones. Superficial surgical site infections in the most commonest type and accounted for about 66.07%
of all the SSI’s and deep surgical site infection accounted for about 25% with 8.92% was organ space. The most
commonly isolated organism from surgical site infections was staphylococcus aureus followed by pseudomonas and then
E. coli. Drains, prosthesis usage and other risk factors of SSI have been identified. Most of the organisms which were
isolated were multidrug resistant. The high rate of resistance to many antibiotics underscored the need for a policy that
could promote a more rational use of antibiotics. Key-words- Surgical site infections, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) risk index, Antibiotic
— Wound infection is the second commonest complication of wound healing. This study was carried out on 250 post-operative cases operated at a district hospital of western Rajasthan, India with the aim the aim to find out prevalence of post-operative surgical site infection and its causing organism. After taking personal information and detailed clinical, operative and post-operative history of these cases, swab from post-operative wound was taken and sent for culture and sensitivity test in Microbiology. Association was inferred with Chi-square test. Post operative surgical site infection rate was found 11.6 % which was found significantly more in intestinal surgeries than the other. Most common causative organism for infection was Staphylococci cases followed by Streptococci, E. Coli and Klebsella. Out of total 11.6% infected cases, majority (8.8%) of patients had infection with more than one organism only 2.8% were having single organism. Keywords— Post-operative surgical Site Infection (SSI), Microorganism , SSI Infection Rate.
According to the National Center for Health Statistics, approximately 46 million surgical procedures are performed annually in the United States, the majority of which are done in an outpatient setting.1
Infection is the most common complication of surgery.2
Surgical site infections (SSIs) occur in approximately 3% to 6% of
patients and prolong hospitalization by an average of 7 days at a direct annual cost of $5 to $10 billion.3,4
SSIs are the third (14%–16%) most frequent cause of nosocomial infections among hospitalized patients.3
Infection occurs within 30 days after the operative procedure if no implant is left in place or within 1 year if implant is in place and the infection appears to be related to the operative procedure
risk factors includes
Age
Obesity
Diabetes
Malnutrition
Prolonged preoperative stay
Infection at remote site
Systemic steroid use
Nicotine use
Despite the routine use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics, surgical-site infection continues to be associated with significant morbidity and cost after colorectal sur- gery. The gentamicin–collagen sponge, an implantable topical antibiotic agent, is approved for surgical implantation in 54 countries. Since 1985, more than 1 million patients have been treated with the sponges.
A discussion on the risk factors, classification and clinical presentation of surgical site infection. Also elucidates the overview of management approach to SSI.
Surgical site Infection during Internship in medical college.pptxrautkrisna
Infections that occur in the wound created by an invasive surgical procedure are generally referred to as surgical site infections (SSIs). SSIs are one of the most important causes of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs). A prevalence survey undertaken in 2006 suggested that approximately 8% of patients in hospital in the UK have an HCAI. SSIs accounted for 14% of these infections and nearly 5% of patients who had undergone a surgical procedure were found to have developed an SSI. However, prevalence studies tend to underestimate SSI because many of these infections occur after the patient has been discharged from hospital. SSIs are associated with considerable morbidity and it has been reported that over one-third of postoperative deaths are related, at least in part, to SSI. However, it is important to recognise that SSIs can range from a relatively trivial wound discharge with no other complications to a life-threatening condition. Other clinical outcomes of SSIs include poor scars that are cosmetically unacceptable, such as those that are spreading, hypertrophic or keloid, persistent pain and itching, restriction of movement, particularly when over joints, and a significant impact on emotional wellbeing. SSI can double the length of time a patient stays in hospital and thereby increase the costs of health care. Additional costs attributable to SSI of between 814 and 6626 have been reported depending on the type of surgery and the severity of the infection. The main additional costs are related to re-operation, extra nursing care and interventions, and drug treatment costs. The indirect costs, due to loss of productivity, patient dissatisfaction and litigation, and reduced quality of life, have been studied less extensively.Infections that occur in the wound created by an invasive surgical procedure are generally referred to as surgical site infections (SSIs). SSIs are one of the most important causes of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs). A prevalence survey undertaken in 2006 suggested that approximately 8% of patients in hospital in the UK have an HCAI. SSIs accounted for 14% of these infections and nearly 5% of patients who had undergone a surgical procedure were found to have developed an SSI. However, prevalence studies tend to underestimate SSI because many of these infections occur after the patient has been discharged from hospital. SSIs are associated with considerable morbidity and it has been reported that over one-third of postoperative deaths are related, at least in part, to SSI. However, it is important to recognise that SSIs can range from a relatively trivial wound discharge with no other complications to a life-threatening condition. Other clinical outcomes of SSIs include poor scars that are cosmetically unacceptable, such as those that are spreading, hypertrophic or keloid, persistent pain and itching, restriction of movement, particularly when over joints, and a significant impact on emotional wllbeing
DOI:10.21276/ijlssr.2016.2.4.1
ABSTRACT- Introduction: Surgical Site Infections (SSI) still remains a significant problem following an operation
and the third most frequently reported nosocomial infections. SSI contributes significantly to increased health care costs in
terms of prolonged hospital stay and lost work days.
Objective: The current study was undertaken to identify incidence of SSI and the risk factors associated with it, and the
common organism isolated and its antibiotic sensitivity and resistance.
Material and Methods: A total number of 3211 patients admitted in general surgical wards for elective surgery in the
study period, out of which 1225 were clean and clean contaminated cases, fulfilling our study criteria. Totally 56 cases
had surgical site infections which had been taken up for this study. Wound discharges were sent for culture and sensitivity.
Results and Conclusions: The overall infection rate was 4.57%. The SSI rate was almost equal in clean surgeries and
clean contaminated ones. Superficial surgical site infections in the most commonest type and accounted for about 66.07%
of all the SSI’s and deep surgical site infection accounted for about 25% with 8.92% was organ space. The most
commonly isolated organism from surgical site infections was staphylococcus aureus followed by pseudomonas and then
E. coli. Drains, prosthesis usage and other risk factors of SSI have been identified. Most of the organisms which were
isolated were multidrug resistant. The high rate of resistance to many antibiotics underscored the need for a policy that
could promote a more rational use of antibiotics. Key-words- Surgical site infections, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) risk index, Antibiotic
— Wound infection is the second commonest complication of wound healing. This study was carried out on 250 post-operative cases operated at a district hospital of western Rajasthan, India with the aim the aim to find out prevalence of post-operative surgical site infection and its causing organism. After taking personal information and detailed clinical, operative and post-operative history of these cases, swab from post-operative wound was taken and sent for culture and sensitivity test in Microbiology. Association was inferred with Chi-square test. Post operative surgical site infection rate was found 11.6 % which was found significantly more in intestinal surgeries than the other. Most common causative organism for infection was Staphylococci cases followed by Streptococci, E. Coli and Klebsella. Out of total 11.6% infected cases, majority (8.8%) of patients had infection with more than one organism only 2.8% were having single organism. Keywords— Post-operative surgical Site Infection (SSI), Microorganism , SSI Infection Rate.
According to the National Center for Health Statistics, approximately 46 million surgical procedures are performed annually in the United States, the majority of which are done in an outpatient setting.1
Infection is the most common complication of surgery.2
Surgical site infections (SSIs) occur in approximately 3% to 6% of
patients and prolong hospitalization by an average of 7 days at a direct annual cost of $5 to $10 billion.3,4
SSIs are the third (14%–16%) most frequent cause of nosocomial infections among hospitalized patients.3
Infection occurs within 30 days after the operative procedure if no implant is left in place or within 1 year if implant is in place and the infection appears to be related to the operative procedure
risk factors includes
Age
Obesity
Diabetes
Malnutrition
Prolonged preoperative stay
Infection at remote site
Systemic steroid use
Nicotine use
Despite the routine use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics, surgical-site infection continues to be associated with significant morbidity and cost after colorectal sur- gery. The gentamicin–collagen sponge, an implantable topical antibiotic agent, is approved for surgical implantation in 54 countries. Since 1985, more than 1 million patients have been treated with the sponges.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
1. What is new in
management of
Surgical Infection
2. Contents:
Introduction
Types of surgical infections
Definition of SSI
Types SSI
Recent management of SSI
sepsis
Peritonitis
3. Soft tissue/wound Infictions.
Third most reported nosocomial
infections
16% of all reported nosocomial
infections
Most common surgical patient
nosocomial infection (38%)
4. 2/3 involved surgical incision
1/3 deep structures accessed
by incision
Deaths in patients with
nosocomial infections—77%
related to infection.
Soft tissue/wound Infictions.
EWMA Journal 2005; 5(2): 11-15.
5. Introduction
< 1900= 70-80% mortality for
wound infection
>1900: Ignaz Semmelweis and
Joseph Lister = antiseptic surgery
6. Introduction
Surgery, trauma, non-trauma
local invasion can lead to
bacterial insult.
Once present, bacteria, initiate
the host defense processes.
Inflammatory mediators
(kinins, histamine, etc.) PMN’ s
arrive, etc.
7. Introduction
Surgical infections
surgical wound itself or in
other systems in the patient.
They can be initiated not only by
“damage” to the host but also
by changes in the host’s
physiologic state.
26. Catheter Sepsis
80% of cases, colonized catheters
had been inserted by inexperienced
and experienced residents
Key is to identify before sepsis
develops
Stapylococcus epidermis, S. Aureus,
yeast
27. Burn Infections
Necrotic tissue readily colonized
High bacteria counts are NOT
a reliable indication of an infected burn
Histological examination to determine
invasiveness
TX: debridement and antibiotics
32. Surgical wounds are healing
by
1) Primary intention
2) Secondary intention
3) Delayed primary intention
33. Incidence of SSIs →closure/delayed
closure of an infected wound
Opening and re-closure times Re-infection
rate %
Opening and re-closure at
once
50
Opening and re-closure after
two days
20
Opening and re-closure after
four days
5
Opening and re-closure after
nine days
10
[Gottrup, F. Wound healing and principles of wound closure. In: Holström H, Drzewieck KT (Eds).
The Scandinavian Handbook of Plastic Surgery. Malmoe: Studenterliteraturen, 2005
34. Definition of SSI
The CDC : =< 30 days of
surgery (or within a year in
the case of implants)
Mangram . Guideline for prevention of surgical
site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;
36. superficial incisional
surgical site infections
< 30 days of procedure
involve only the skin or
subcutaneous tissue around
the incision.
Mangram . Guideline for prevention of surgical
site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999
37. Deep incisional surgical
site infections
< 30 days of procedure (or one
year in the case of implants)
are related to the procedure
involve deep soft tissues, such
as the fascia and muscles.
Mangram . Guideline for prevention of surgical
site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999
46. Factors influencing SSIs
Surgical Risk Factors
Type of procedure
Degree of contamination
Duration of operation
Urgency of operation
skin preparation
operating room environment
Antibiotic prophylaxis
EWMA Journal 2005; 5(2): 11-15.
47. Wound class Definition Example Infection
rate (%)
Clean Nontraumatic, elective
surgery. GI tract,
respiratory tract, GU tract
not entered
Mastectomy
Vascular
Hernias
2%
Clean-
contaminated
Respiratory, GI, GU tract
entered with minimal
contamination
Gastrectomy
Hysterectomy
< 10%
Contaminated Open, fresh, traumatic
wounds, uncontrolled
spillage, minor break in
sterile technique
Rupture appy
Emergent
bowel resect.
20%
Dirty Open, traumatic, dirty
wounds; traumatic
perforation of hollow
viscus, frank pus in the
field
Intestinal
fistula
resection
28-70%
Berard F, Gandon J, Ann Surg 1964
48. Reduce hemoglobin A1c levels
to <7% before operation
Evidence
Class II data
References
Anderson DJ, Kaye KS, Classen D, et
al. Strategies to prevent surgical site
infections in acute care hospitals.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;
49. Smoking cessation 30 d
before operation
Evidence
Class II data
References
Anderson DJ, Kaye KS, Classen D, et
al. Strategies to prevent surgical site
infections in acute care hospitals.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008
50. Remove hair only if it will interfere with
the operation; hair removal by clipping
immediately before the operation or
with depilatories; no pre- or
perioperative shaving of surgical
Evidence
Class I data
References
Kjønniksen I. Preoperative hair removal–
a systematic literature review. AORN J
2002
51. Use an antiseptic surgical scrub
or alcohol-based hand antiseptic
for preoperative cleansing of the
operative team members’ hands
and forearms
Evidence
Class II data
References
Anderson DJ. Strategies to prevent
surgical site
infections in acute care hospitals.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;
52. Prepare the skin around the
operative site with an appropriate
antiseptic agent, including
preparations based on alcohol,
chlorhexidine, or iodine/iodophors
Evidence
Class II data
References
Anderson . Strategies to prevent
surgical site
infections in acute care hospitals.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;
53. Administer prophylactic antibiotics
for most clean-contaminated and
contaminated procedures, and
selected clean procedures use
antibiotics appropriate for the
potential pathogens
Evidence
Strong Class I data
References
Springer R. The Surgical care
improvement project-focusing on infection
control.Plast Surg Nurs 2007;
54. Administer prophylactic antibiotics within
1 h before incision (2 h for vancomycin
and fluoroquinolones)
Evidence
Strong Class II data
References
Springer R. The Surgical care
improvement project-focusing on
infection control.Plast Surg Nurs
2007
55. Use higher dosages of
prophylactic antibiotics
for morbidly obese patients
Evidence
Limited Class II data
References
Springer R. The Surgical care
improvement project-focusing on
infection control.Plast Surg Nurs
2007
56. Carefully handle tissue, eradicate dead
space, and adhere to standard principles
of asepsis
Evidence
Class III
References
Anderson DJ. Strategies to prevent
surgical site infections in acute care
hospitals. Infect Control Hosp
Epidemiol 2008;
57. Redose prophylactic antibiotics with
short half-lives intraoperatively if
operation is prolonged (for cefazolin if
operation is >3 h) or if there is
extensive blood loss
Evidence
Limited Class I, Class II data
References
Scher K. Studies on the duration of
antibiotic administration for surgical
prophylaxis Am Surg 1997
59. Discontinue prophylactic
antibiotics within 24 h after the
procedure (48 h for cardiac surgery
&liver transplant procedures)
discontinue prophylactic
antibiotics after skin closure
Evidence
Class I;
meta-analyses support single dose
regimens for prophylaxis
References ASHP Therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial
prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999
60. Maintain serum glucose
levels <200 mg/dL on PO
Evidence
Class II data
References
Anderson DJ. Strategies to prevent
surgical site infections in acute care
hospitals. Infect Control Hosp
Epidemiol 2008
61. Monitor wound for the
development of SSI
postoperative days 1 and 2d
Evidence
Class III data
References
Anderson DJ. Strategies to prevent
surgical site infections in acute care
hospitals. Infect Control Hosp
Epidemiol 2008
62. • opening the wound I&D .
• For most patients who have had their
wounds opened and adequately
drained, antibiotic therapy is unnecessary.
Treatment of SSI
Stevens DL. Prguidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue
infections. Clin Infect Dis 2005actice
63. o use antibiotics only when there are
significant systemic signs of infection
(temperature higher than
38.5Cor heart rate greater than 100
beats/min)
erythema extends more than 5 cm
from the incision.
Stevens DL. Prguidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and
soft-tissue infections. Clin Infect Dis 2005actice
Treatment of SSI
64. Sepsis
Sepsis: Commonly called a
"blood stream infection.“
The presence of bacteria
(bacteremia) or other infectious
organisms or their toxins in the
blood (septicemia) or in other
tissue of the body.
65. Sepsis
Sepsis may be associated with clinical
symptoms of systemic (bodywide)
illness, such as fever, chills, malaise ,
low blood pressure, and mental status
changes.
Sepsis can be a serious situation, a life
threatening disease calling for urgent
and comprehensive care.
66. Sepsis, Septic shock
Signs of:
Increased C.O.
Altered O2 SATURATION.
Metabolic acidosis (usually)
Can lead to ---Death.
67. Sepsis
Sepsis remains a major clinical
problem for 21st century
marginal improvement in the
mortality
antibiotics are cornerstone
10% improvement in mortality
Mac Arthur RD et al.Adequacy of early empiric antibiotic treatment in severe sepsis
experience from MONARCS trial . Clin Infect Dis 2004;38(2):284-88
68. Cytokines Release
TNF , IL1
IL6,10
Protease ,PG
PAF
Endothelial
injury
Coagulopathy
Tissue factor
Fibrin
clot
Inhibit activity
Protein C
Antithrombin III
Suppress
fibrinolysis
69. The aim
Sepsis is condition diagnosed on the
bases of clinical & laboratory parameters
increased level of inflammatory
mediators reflects global dysregulation of
immune response
Examine the latest evidence for the use
of immuno-modulating drugs obtained
from human clinical trials
71. Sepsis And host response
More than adequate
or
Inadequate.
72. Inadequate Host response
Stimulation by Levamisole
Pro inflammatory Cytokine
interferon y
Anti- prostaglandins
(immunosuppressive
mediators
73. IL-10
IL- 10 administration
improves survival
following endotoxin
challenge
Live candida - block IL-10-
improves survival
74. More than adequate host
response
Anti-inflammatory cyotkines
like Interleukin 10
Agents to neutralise tumor
necrsois factor or interlekin -1
75. Severity assessment
PAC- initially
Ultra low frequency ossillations in
CO/global end diastolic vol -severity
high
Lactate levels –good severity predictor
Low exogenous clearance – very early
predictor of mortality
C reactive protein – high risk of organ
failure/ too slow to monitor
76. Management of Sepsis
Hemodynamic, respiratory
stability
Source control in sepsis
Early enteral feed/intensive
insulin therapy
stress ulcer prophylaxis, and
deep vein thrombosis
Daily hemodalysis – better survival
77. Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT)
Oximetric central venous catheters
were placed to measure central
venous pressure
(CVP) & CvO2
500-mL aliquots of isotonic
crystalloid were given by bolus
infusion to achieve a central venous
pressure greater than 8 mm Hg.
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment
of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;
78. Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT)
Mean arterial pressure was
maintained at 65 mm Hg or higher
with vasopressors.
If the CvO2 saturation was still less
than 70%, blood was transfused to
a hematocritof 30.
If the CvO2 saturation was still less
than 70%, dobutamine was started.
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment
of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;
79. Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT)
Mortality was significantly lower
among patients randomized to
EGDT (48.2% versus
33.3%, P 5 .01).
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment
of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;
80. Sepsis
it is complex process and the
goal of immune therapy is
identifying critical point of
response to modulate it
81.
82. TNF
TNF is an important mediator
of sepsis
Serum level correlate with
outcome
Immunotherapy :
- Antibodies
- Blocking receptor
Calandra T et al.Prognostic values of tumor necrosis factor/cachectin,interlukin-
1,interferon-alpha and interferon gamma in the serum of patients with septic shock.
J Infec Dis 1990;161:982-87
83. Blockade of tumor necrosis
factor
Improves outcome in E.
coli septicemia.
But increased mortality
with cecal ligation and
puncture.
84. TNF antibody
NEROCEPT :
reduction of mortality 1st 3
days - dose dependant
INTERSEPT :
-reduce progression of sepsis
- rapid resolution of shock
85. TNF antireciptor:
Recombinant receptor :
- dose dependant increase
in mortality
- deleterious effect in
human clinical trial
Fisher CJ et al.Treatment of septic shock with the tumot necrosis factor receptor.Fc
fusion protein .N Engl J Med 1996;334:1697-702
86. Most widely known and used
immunotherapy
Blunt & potent anti-inflammatory
Action :
Prevent complement activation
inhibit nitrous oxide synthatase
Decrease proinflammatory
cytokines
inhibit neutrophil aggregation
stabilise lysosomal membrane
Steroids
87. 1960-90S No advantage
1997 increase mortality with high dose
Beneficial for patient with adrenal
insufficiency
Currently “ 2nd generation trials” :
- low & physiological dose
- long duration
- vasopressor dependant pt
- no difference among
corticotrophic
dependant or non dependant
Minneci PC et al Meta analysis:the effect of steroids on survival & shock during sepsis
depend on the dose. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:47-57
88.
89. Inhibit thrombin and factor Xa
low during sepsis d/t
- impaired synthesis
- consumption by DIC
- degradation by elastase
Abraham E et al.Efficacy and safety of tifacogen in severe sepsis: randomised
controlled trial .JAMA 2003;290:238-47
90.
91. APC action
Anticoagulant
Anti-inflammatory
inhibit transcription
NF-kB reducing
pro-inflammatory
cytokines
APC
inactivate Va,VIIa
Low level in sepsis
cytokine-induced
down-regulation of
thrombomodulin
Esmon CT. Inflammation & thrombosis : mutual regulation by protein C.
Immunologist 1998;6:84-89
92.
93. 48hrs /reduces mortality
iv 24 ug/ kg/hr x 96hrs
Recombinant APC “ Dotrecogin alfa” :
- Significant reduction of mortality
- faster resolution cardiovascular &
respiratory dysfunction
PROWESS ( protein c worldwide evaluation in severe sepsis)
multicentre study,2001
APC
94. Vasopressor/ Inotropics
The Surviving Sepsis guidelines
recommended
dopamine or norepinephrine as first
line agents.
Vasopressin should be considered an
important adjunct vasopressor.
Epinephrine may be considered as a
second line agent.
Matthew C. Byrnes, MDa,b,*, GregJ. Beilman, MDa
97. All of the mentioned immunotherapeutic
strategies worked in animal models of sepsis
but not always converted into patient
Comorbidity
Extreme ages
organ dysfunction
genetic polymorphism
site of infection
100. Only APC has been shown to improve
outcome in septic patient
low steroid dose also worthy , should not
restricted to corticotrophin hypo-
responsive patient
Sprung CL et al.Influence of alterations in foregoing life sustaining treatment
practices on a clinical sepsis trial.Critical Care Medicine 1997;25:383-7
101. most effective management of septic
patient remains recognition support of
organ dysfunction
antibiotics remain the cornerstone of
management