Strategic Issues and Choices in Using
  Contingent and Flexible Workers
Dr. G C Mohanta, BE(Mech), MSc(Engg), MBA, PhD(Mgt)
                     Professor
Role Played by Contingent Workers
    and Flexible Work Schedules
Contribute to meeting the goals of cost control and
 Product or service innovation
Cost control objective requires firms to reduce output
  costs per employee
Contingent employment saves companies
  considerable amounts of money because:
- They do not give these workers most discretionary
  benefits, or
- Provide less general amounts of such benefits
- Discretionary benefits represent a significant fiscal
  cost to companies
Cost Control Objectives
Employers’ use of well trained contingent workers also
 contributes through reduced training costs
Not all contingent workers know company specific
 work practices and procedures
Company specific training represents a significant cost
 to companies
Companies that do not employ contingent workers
 long enough to realize productivity benefits from
 training, undermine cost control objectives
Company sponsored training may seem to contradict
 lowest cost imperative in short term
Factors Increase Short Term Costs
Cost of training materials and instructors’
 professional fees

Downtime while employees are
 participating in training
 Inefficiencies that may result until
 employees master new skills
Longer Term Perspectives on Cost Control

Contingent work arrangements support lowest cost
   imperatives in longer term perspectives
Productivity enhancements and increased flexibility
   should far outweigh short run costs
- if companies establish track records of:
• high productivity,
• quality and
• exemplary customer service
Flexible Schedules
Flexible schedules contribute to lowest
 cost imperatives
Flexible employees demonstrate lower
 absenteeism than employee with fixed work
 schedules
Product and Service Innovation Objective
This requires creative, open minded risk taking
 employees
Companies that pursue differentiation strategies
 must take a longer term focus to attain their
 objectives
Both arrangements should contribute to innovations
Companies will benefit from influx of new
 employees from time to time who bring fresh ideas
 with them
Contingent employment should minimize problems
 of groupthink, as all group members view issues
Flexible work schedules
Flexible work schedules promote differentiation
 strategies for two reasons:
First, flexible work schedules enable employees to work
 when they are at their physical or mental best
Some individuals most alert during morning hours,
 others most alert during afternoon/evening hours
 because of differences in biorhythms
 Second, flexible work schedules allow employees to
 work with fewer distractions & worries about personal
 matters
Inherent flexibility of these schedules allows employees
 to attend to personal matters as needed
Contingent Employment
Employers justify increased contingent employment
 with business necessity - cost containment & flexibility
Companies are trading employee loyalty for reduced
 costs and greater flexibility
Employees previously were maintaining employment
 within their choice companies as long as they wished
Many employees remained with a single company for
 decades at a time culminating in a retirement bash and
 receipt of a ‘gold’ watch for long time service
Such companies as Ford Motor Company, General
 Motors, IBM and Lincoln Electric exemplified extended
 employment
Contingent Employment
Workers do not forget past practices that once led to job
 security and sound retirement benefits
Workers may not take personal interest in companies’
 performance as employment relationship becomes more
 tentative
Workers will look for better and more secured employment
 else where & less loyal to employers
Companies may become victim to reduced employee loyalty,
 resulting in:
- heightened job insecurity among core employees
- lower control over product or service quality
- higher turnover
- compliance burdens and costs and
- greater training costs
Contingent Employment
First, both contingent and core workers may develop
 less loyalty for their employers
Hiring contingent workers may lead core employees
 to feel less secure about their status
Because staffing companies with contingent workers
 generally represents a lower cost alternative to core
 employees
 Consequently, core employees’ loyalties may become
 diminished, which can translate into lower worker
 dependability and work quality
Contingent Employment
Second, employers can lose control over product or
 service quality when they employ contingent workers
 This occurs when companies engage contingent
 workers on short term basis
It takes contingent workers time to learn company
 specific procedures and work processes
Companies that do not employ contingent workers
 long enough will not maintain sufficient control over
 quality
Contingent Employment
Third, turnover rates among core workers will
 probably increase when companies employ
 contingent workers
Core employees may feel uncertain about their job
 status and this uncertainty will lead to lower loyalty
Absence of job security and diminished loyalty will
 increase core employees’ job search activities
most qualified core employees may receive
 competitive job offers that lead to dysfunctional
 turnover
Contingent Employment
Finally companies must bear the costs of training
 contingent workers
In many cases, employing contingent workers can be
 as costly as employing core workers
Savings from not offering contingent workers
 discretionary benefits is offset by training costs
These costs become less significant for companies
 that employ contingent workers long enough to
 realize returns on the training investment through
 higher productivity and work quality
Case
Everyone telecommutes at your firm. All work is done in
virtual teams of four. Divide up into groups of four and
respond to the following questions:
  How  will you organize your team?
  Do you need a virtual leader?

  How will you select your virtual team?

  How will you hold team members
   accountable?

Strategic issues & choices in using contingent workforce

  • 1.
    Strategic Issues andChoices in Using Contingent and Flexible Workers Dr. G C Mohanta, BE(Mech), MSc(Engg), MBA, PhD(Mgt) Professor
  • 2.
    Role Played byContingent Workers and Flexible Work Schedules Contribute to meeting the goals of cost control and  Product or service innovation Cost control objective requires firms to reduce output costs per employee Contingent employment saves companies considerable amounts of money because: - They do not give these workers most discretionary benefits, or - Provide less general amounts of such benefits - Discretionary benefits represent a significant fiscal cost to companies
  • 3.
    Cost Control Objectives Employers’use of well trained contingent workers also contributes through reduced training costs Not all contingent workers know company specific work practices and procedures Company specific training represents a significant cost to companies Companies that do not employ contingent workers long enough to realize productivity benefits from training, undermine cost control objectives Company sponsored training may seem to contradict lowest cost imperative in short term
  • 4.
    Factors Increase ShortTerm Costs Cost of training materials and instructors’ professional fees Downtime while employees are participating in training  Inefficiencies that may result until employees master new skills
  • 5.
    Longer Term Perspectiveson Cost Control Contingent work arrangements support lowest cost imperatives in longer term perspectives Productivity enhancements and increased flexibility should far outweigh short run costs - if companies establish track records of: • high productivity, • quality and • exemplary customer service
  • 6.
    Flexible Schedules Flexible schedulescontribute to lowest cost imperatives Flexible employees demonstrate lower absenteeism than employee with fixed work schedules
  • 7.
    Product and ServiceInnovation Objective This requires creative, open minded risk taking employees Companies that pursue differentiation strategies must take a longer term focus to attain their objectives Both arrangements should contribute to innovations Companies will benefit from influx of new employees from time to time who bring fresh ideas with them Contingent employment should minimize problems of groupthink, as all group members view issues
  • 8.
    Flexible work schedules Flexiblework schedules promote differentiation strategies for two reasons: First, flexible work schedules enable employees to work when they are at their physical or mental best Some individuals most alert during morning hours, others most alert during afternoon/evening hours because of differences in biorhythms  Second, flexible work schedules allow employees to work with fewer distractions & worries about personal matters Inherent flexibility of these schedules allows employees to attend to personal matters as needed
  • 9.
    Contingent Employment Employers justifyincreased contingent employment with business necessity - cost containment & flexibility Companies are trading employee loyalty for reduced costs and greater flexibility Employees previously were maintaining employment within their choice companies as long as they wished Many employees remained with a single company for decades at a time culminating in a retirement bash and receipt of a ‘gold’ watch for long time service Such companies as Ford Motor Company, General Motors, IBM and Lincoln Electric exemplified extended employment
  • 10.
    Contingent Employment Workers donot forget past practices that once led to job security and sound retirement benefits Workers may not take personal interest in companies’ performance as employment relationship becomes more tentative Workers will look for better and more secured employment else where & less loyal to employers Companies may become victim to reduced employee loyalty, resulting in: - heightened job insecurity among core employees - lower control over product or service quality - higher turnover - compliance burdens and costs and - greater training costs
  • 11.
    Contingent Employment First, bothcontingent and core workers may develop less loyalty for their employers Hiring contingent workers may lead core employees to feel less secure about their status Because staffing companies with contingent workers generally represents a lower cost alternative to core employees  Consequently, core employees’ loyalties may become diminished, which can translate into lower worker dependability and work quality
  • 12.
    Contingent Employment Second, employerscan lose control over product or service quality when they employ contingent workers  This occurs when companies engage contingent workers on short term basis It takes contingent workers time to learn company specific procedures and work processes Companies that do not employ contingent workers long enough will not maintain sufficient control over quality
  • 13.
    Contingent Employment Third, turnoverrates among core workers will probably increase when companies employ contingent workers Core employees may feel uncertain about their job status and this uncertainty will lead to lower loyalty Absence of job security and diminished loyalty will increase core employees’ job search activities most qualified core employees may receive competitive job offers that lead to dysfunctional turnover
  • 14.
    Contingent Employment Finally companiesmust bear the costs of training contingent workers In many cases, employing contingent workers can be as costly as employing core workers Savings from not offering contingent workers discretionary benefits is offset by training costs These costs become less significant for companies that employ contingent workers long enough to realize returns on the training investment through higher productivity and work quality
  • 15.
    Case Everyone telecommutes atyour firm. All work is done in virtual teams of four. Divide up into groups of four and respond to the following questions: How will you organize your team? Do you need a virtual leader? How will you select your virtual team? How will you hold team members accountable?

Editor's Notes

  • #16 Students will have various responses to each questions. Some type of “virtual leadership” will probably be necessary – maybe a rotating leader position. The virtual team will probably be selected much as any other team would be selected – based on skills, expertise, ability to collaborate, etc. The accountability is crucial when not face to face. They may email drafts of their work – one person circulates their draft and all edit or provide feedback, etc.