Sachpazis masonry column with eccentric vertical and wind loading in accordan...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document summarizes the analysis and design of a clay masonry column according to Eurocode standards. It provides details of the column geometry, material properties, loads, and calculations to check the column's capacity against bending moments. The column passes all checks for strength and stability.
Sachpazis Cantilever Retaining Wall, In accordance to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10 ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
The document provides design details and load calculations for a cantilever retaining wall. It includes material properties, wall geometry, reinforcement details, load combinations, soil parameters, and check summaries. Stability, toe, heel, stem, and reinforcement checks are presented to verify design requirements are met based on the 2012 International Building Code and ASCE 7-10 standards.
This document provides an analysis and design of a gabion retaining wall according to BS8002:1994. It includes the geometry of the 3-tier gabion wall, calculations of forces, and checks for overturning stability, sliding stability, and bearing pressure. The analysis finds the wall design satisfies minimum safety factors of 2.0 for overturning, 1.5 for sliding, and the bearing pressure is less than the allowable soil pressure. A separate analysis is provided for stability between the 2nd and 3rd tiers.
This document describes the analysis and design of a reinforced masonry retaining wall. It provides details of the wall geometry, soil properties, and loading conditions. Calculations are shown for the wall dimensions, force distributions, and safety checks against sliding and overturning. The factor of safety against sliding is calculated to be 1.738, indicating the wall design is sufficient.
Sachpazis Foundation Pad with Two Columns Analysis & Design According to EC2 ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides analysis and design calculations for the foundation of a pad supporting two columns according to Eurocode standards. It includes details of the foundation geometry and applied loads, as well as soil properties and calculations of bearing capacity, settlement, sliding resistance, and overturning to check if code requirements are satisfied. Diagrams and input parameters are provided over 13 pages of calculations and output.
Sachpazis masonry column with eccentric vertical and wind loading in accordan...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document summarizes the analysis and design of a clay masonry column according to Eurocode standards. It provides details of the column geometry, material properties, loads, and calculations to check the column's capacity against bending moments. The column passes all checks for strength and stability.
Sachpazis Cantilever Retaining Wall, In accordance to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10 ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
The document provides design details and load calculations for a cantilever retaining wall. It includes material properties, wall geometry, reinforcement details, load combinations, soil parameters, and check summaries. Stability, toe, heel, stem, and reinforcement checks are presented to verify design requirements are met based on the 2012 International Building Code and ASCE 7-10 standards.
This document provides an analysis and design of a gabion retaining wall according to BS8002:1994. It includes the geometry of the 3-tier gabion wall, calculations of forces, and checks for overturning stability, sliding stability, and bearing pressure. The analysis finds the wall design satisfies minimum safety factors of 2.0 for overturning, 1.5 for sliding, and the bearing pressure is less than the allowable soil pressure. A separate analysis is provided for stability between the 2nd and 3rd tiers.
This document describes the analysis and design of a reinforced masonry retaining wall. It provides details of the wall geometry, soil properties, and loading conditions. Calculations are shown for the wall dimensions, force distributions, and safety checks against sliding and overturning. The factor of safety against sliding is calculated to be 1.738, indicating the wall design is sufficient.
Sachpazis Foundation Pad with Two Columns Analysis & Design According to EC2 ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides analysis and design calculations for the foundation of a pad supporting two columns according to Eurocode standards. It includes details of the foundation geometry and applied loads, as well as soil properties and calculations of bearing capacity, settlement, sliding resistance, and overturning to check if code requirements are satisfied. Diagrams and input parameters are provided over 13 pages of calculations and output.
Sachpazis_Circular Section Column Design & Analysis, Calculations according t...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document contains calculations for the design of a circular reinforced concrete column according to Eurocode standards. It includes the design of the column for various load cases including tension/compression, biaxial bending with axial load, shear and torsion. The calculations determine the required reinforcement area, reinforcement ratios, load capacities, and other design parameters. The document provides the section properties, material strengths, load details and multi-page results of the column design analysis and checks.
Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005 + A1:2012 incorporating Corrigenda
February 2006 and July 2009 and the UK national annex.
Sachpazis: Strip Foundation Analysis and Design example (EN1997-1:2004)Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Strip Foundation Analysis and Design example, in accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the recommended values
Sachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof exampleDr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides an example calculation of wind loading on a hipped roof structure according to Eurocode 1991-1-4. It includes details of the building geometry, terrain conditions, and calculation of peak velocity pressures and net pressures on different zones of the roof and walls. The results are tabulated forces on the roof and walls for two different wind directions. The overall net windward force on the structure is also calculated considering lack of correlation between windward and leeward pressures.
Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document verifies the ultimate punching shear resistance of a structural element according to Eurocode 2. It contains calculations of punching shear stress and resistance for different zones, including the zone adjacent to the support, zone with punching shear reinforcement, and external zone. It checks various design values and requirements regarding punching shear reinforcement spacing, perimeter dimensions, and stress versus resistance criteria. The goal is to verify the punching shear capacity based on the code-specified design method and limit states.
Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
- GEODOMISI Ltd is a civil and geotechnical engineering consulting company located in Greece.
- The document provides details on the analysis and design of a reinforced concrete slab according to Eurocode standards, including slab dimensions, material properties, loading, and reinforcement design calculations at various locations.
- The reinforcement designs at midspan and supports in both span directions meet code requirements for area of steel and bar spacing.
Sachpazis_Trapezoid Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
The document summarizes the calculation of foundations and reinforcement for a trapezoidal pad foundation supporting a column. Soil properties, foundation geometry, loads, and limit states are defined. Calculations are presented for bearing capacity, sliding resistance, uplift, bending moments, required reinforcement, and punching shear. The foundation dimensions were optimized, resulting in a wider and longer foundation with increased depths. All limit states checks passed requirements.
This document provides a raft foundation design analysis and design in accordance with BS8110 Part 1-1997. It includes definitions of the soil properties, raft geometry, material properties, and loading. It then performs checks for bearing capacity, bending, shear, and deflection for the internal slab and edge beams. Reinforcement is designed for the slab and edge beams to satisfy the various design checks.
Pocket reinforced masonry Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the recommended values
Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides a wind loading analysis and design for a duopitch roof according to EN1991-1-4. It includes:
1) Details of the building such as dimensions, roof pitch, and height.
2) Calculation of basic wind values such as velocity and pressure according to the standard.
3) Analysis of wind pressures on different zones of the roof and walls for two wind directions.
4) Calculation of net forces and overall loading on the structure for design.
The analysis determines the peak wind velocities and pressures on the roof and wall elements, accounts for internal pressures, and calculates the net forces and overall design wind load for the structure.
Sachpazis_CHS Column base plate to EC3 1993-1 with NA CENDr.Costas Sachpazis
GEODOMISI Ltd. is a civil and geotechnical engineering consulting company specializing in structural engineering, soil mechanics, rock mechanics, foundation engineering, and retaining structures. The document provides details of a column base plate analysis and design for a CHS column in accordance with Eurocode standards, including the column and base plate dimensions and materials, applied loads, concrete foundation details, and calculations checking the bearing capacity, frictional resistance, and weld strength. The analysis confirms the base plate design is adequate to resist the applied loads with sufficient bearing area, frictional resistance, and weld strength.
Sachpazis: Wind Loading Analysis & Design for a Hipped Roof Example According...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides calculations for wind loading analysis and design of a hipped roof building according to Eurocode standards. It includes details of the building geometry, wind speed calculations, velocity pressure calculations for different zones of the roof and walls, and resulting net forces and pressures on the structure for two different wind directions. The summary provides essential information on the purpose, methodology, and key results of the wind loading analysis.
This document describes the stages of construction for a cantilever pile retaining wall. Stage 1 involves excavating to a depth of 5 meters on one side of the wall. Soil properties, borehole data, wall and surcharge details are provided. Calculations are presented for earth pressures on the wall at various stages, structural forces, and durability. Diagrams show the wall configuration and results of analyses.
This document provides details of the analysis and design of a flat slab foundation according to BS8110:Part 1:1997. It includes the slab geometry, material properties, loading details, and calculations for the design of reinforcement in the sagging and hogging bending moments for internal and edge spans in the x-direction. Reinforcement areas are calculated and reinforcement arrangements are selected to satisfy design requirements. Deflection checks are also performed.
Retaining walls are designed to retain soil at an angle greater than its natural slope, usually in a near-vertical position. They work by either their own mass or through leverage to prevent overturning, sliding, or soil overload. Design considerations include the subsoil type and water table level, as they can impact bearing capacity and hydrostatic pressure. Common wall types are gravity, cantilever, counterfort, precast concrete, and precast crib walls. Proper design is needed to ensure stability based on the wall height, materials, and subsurface conditions.
The document provides a design example for a reinforced concrete retaining wall with the following conditions:
1. The wall must retain a backfill with a unit weight of 100 pcf and a surcharge of 400 psf.
2. The wall stem is designed as a vertical cantilever beam to resist lateral earth pressures.
3. The base thickness is selected as 16 inches and the stem thickness as 15 inches with #8 reinforcing bars at 6 inches.
4. The heel width is selected as 7.5 feet to prevent sliding failure based on resisting and driving forces.
Sachpazis_Circular Section Column Design & Analysis, Calculations according t...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document contains calculations for the design of a circular reinforced concrete column according to Eurocode standards. It includes the design of the column for various load cases including tension/compression, biaxial bending with axial load, shear and torsion. The calculations determine the required reinforcement area, reinforcement ratios, load capacities, and other design parameters. The document provides the section properties, material strengths, load details and multi-page results of the column design analysis and checks.
Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Masonry Wall Panel Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005 + A1:2012 incorporating Corrigenda
February 2006 and July 2009 and the UK national annex.
Sachpazis: Strip Foundation Analysis and Design example (EN1997-1:2004)Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Strip Foundation Analysis and Design example, in accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the recommended values
Sachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof exampleDr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides an example calculation of wind loading on a hipped roof structure according to Eurocode 1991-1-4. It includes details of the building geometry, terrain conditions, and calculation of peak velocity pressures and net pressures on different zones of the roof and walls. The results are tabulated forces on the roof and walls for two different wind directions. The overall net windward force on the structure is also calculated considering lack of correlation between windward and leeward pressures.
Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document verifies the ultimate punching shear resistance of a structural element according to Eurocode 2. It contains calculations of punching shear stress and resistance for different zones, including the zone adjacent to the support, zone with punching shear reinforcement, and external zone. It checks various design values and requirements regarding punching shear reinforcement spacing, perimeter dimensions, and stress versus resistance criteria. The goal is to verify the punching shear capacity based on the code-specified design method and limit states.
Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
- GEODOMISI Ltd is a civil and geotechnical engineering consulting company located in Greece.
- The document provides details on the analysis and design of a reinforced concrete slab according to Eurocode standards, including slab dimensions, material properties, loading, and reinforcement design calculations at various locations.
- The reinforcement designs at midspan and supports in both span directions meet code requirements for area of steel and bar spacing.
Sachpazis_Trapezoid Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
The document summarizes the calculation of foundations and reinforcement for a trapezoidal pad foundation supporting a column. Soil properties, foundation geometry, loads, and limit states are defined. Calculations are presented for bearing capacity, sliding resistance, uplift, bending moments, required reinforcement, and punching shear. The foundation dimensions were optimized, resulting in a wider and longer foundation with increased depths. All limit states checks passed requirements.
This document provides a raft foundation design analysis and design in accordance with BS8110 Part 1-1997. It includes definitions of the soil properties, raft geometry, material properties, and loading. It then performs checks for bearing capacity, bending, shear, and deflection for the internal slab and edge beams. Reinforcement is designed for the slab and edge beams to satisfy the various design checks.
Pocket reinforced masonry Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the recommended values
Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides a wind loading analysis and design for a duopitch roof according to EN1991-1-4. It includes:
1) Details of the building such as dimensions, roof pitch, and height.
2) Calculation of basic wind values such as velocity and pressure according to the standard.
3) Analysis of wind pressures on different zones of the roof and walls for two wind directions.
4) Calculation of net forces and overall loading on the structure for design.
The analysis determines the peak wind velocities and pressures on the roof and wall elements, accounts for internal pressures, and calculates the net forces and overall design wind load for the structure.
Sachpazis_CHS Column base plate to EC3 1993-1 with NA CENDr.Costas Sachpazis
GEODOMISI Ltd. is a civil and geotechnical engineering consulting company specializing in structural engineering, soil mechanics, rock mechanics, foundation engineering, and retaining structures. The document provides details of a column base plate analysis and design for a CHS column in accordance with Eurocode standards, including the column and base plate dimensions and materials, applied loads, concrete foundation details, and calculations checking the bearing capacity, frictional resistance, and weld strength. The analysis confirms the base plate design is adequate to resist the applied loads with sufficient bearing area, frictional resistance, and weld strength.
Sachpazis: Wind Loading Analysis & Design for a Hipped Roof Example According...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides calculations for wind loading analysis and design of a hipped roof building according to Eurocode standards. It includes details of the building geometry, wind speed calculations, velocity pressure calculations for different zones of the roof and walls, and resulting net forces and pressures on the structure for two different wind directions. The summary provides essential information on the purpose, methodology, and key results of the wind loading analysis.
This document describes the stages of construction for a cantilever pile retaining wall. Stage 1 involves excavating to a depth of 5 meters on one side of the wall. Soil properties, borehole data, wall and surcharge details are provided. Calculations are presented for earth pressures on the wall at various stages, structural forces, and durability. Diagrams show the wall configuration and results of analyses.
This document provides details of the analysis and design of a flat slab foundation according to BS8110:Part 1:1997. It includes the slab geometry, material properties, loading details, and calculations for the design of reinforcement in the sagging and hogging bending moments for internal and edge spans in the x-direction. Reinforcement areas are calculated and reinforcement arrangements are selected to satisfy design requirements. Deflection checks are also performed.
Retaining walls are designed to retain soil at an angle greater than its natural slope, usually in a near-vertical position. They work by either their own mass or through leverage to prevent overturning, sliding, or soil overload. Design considerations include the subsoil type and water table level, as they can impact bearing capacity and hydrostatic pressure. Common wall types are gravity, cantilever, counterfort, precast concrete, and precast crib walls. Proper design is needed to ensure stability based on the wall height, materials, and subsurface conditions.
The document provides a design example for a reinforced concrete retaining wall with the following conditions:
1. The wall must retain a backfill with a unit weight of 100 pcf and a surcharge of 400 psf.
2. The wall stem is designed as a vertical cantilever beam to resist lateral earth pressures.
3. The base thickness is selected as 16 inches and the stem thickness as 15 inches with #8 reinforcing bars at 6 inches.
4. The heel width is selected as 7.5 feet to prevent sliding failure based on resisting and driving forces.
Retaining walls are structures used to retain soil or rock in a vertical position. Common materials used include wood, steel, concrete, and gabions. Retaining walls are classified as externally or internally stabilized. Externally stabilized include in-situ and gravity walls. Internally stabilized include reinforced soils and in-site reinforcement. Design considerations include ensuring stability against overturning, sliding, and overloading soils. Design also accounts for active and passive earth pressures. Common gravity wall types are massive gravity, crib, and cantilever walls. In-situ walls include sheet pile, soldier pile, and slurry walls. Reinforced and geosynthetic retaining walls are advanced wall types.
The document discusses retaining walls and includes:
- Definitions of retaining walls and their parts
- Common types of retaining walls including gravity, semi-gravity, cantilever, counterfort and bulkhead walls
- Earth pressures like active, passive and at rest pressures
- Design principles for stability against sliding, overturning and bearing capacity
- Drainage considerations for retaining walls
- Theories for analyzing earth pressures like Rankine and Coulomb's theories
- Sample design calculations and problems for checking stability of retaining walls
Retaining walls are used to retain earth in a vertical position where there is an abrupt change in ground level. There are several types of retaining walls including gravity, cantilever, counterfort, and buttress walls. Cantilever walls are the most common type for heights up to 8 meters. They consist of a vertical stem and base slab that behave like one-way cantilevers. Counterfort walls include transverse supports called counterforts to reduce bending moments in the stem and slabs. Proper design of the stem, heel slab, toe slab, and foundation depth is required to resist overturning, sliding, soil pressure, and bending failure.
The City of Edmonton was undertaking a project to widen Whitemud Drive and the Quesnell Bridge. The original design for the retaining wall presented constructability challenges. The HCM/Isherwood design-build team proposed an alternative design using a cast-in-place retaining wall supported by drilled caissons as a more feasible solution. Monitoring during construction identified weaker soil than expected, requiring design changes to ensure slope stability. The innovative design approach ultimately provided a safer and more constructable solution.
Review of Analysis of Retaining Wall Under Static and Seismic Loadingijsrd.com
This paper presents a comparison of the various methods of analysis of retaining wallsunder seismic loads, which is considered to be very complex.As the soil-structure interaction during the earthquake is very complex, the most commonly used methods for the seismic design of retaining walls are the Pseudo static method, Seed and Whitman method and Mononobe and Okabe method. The retaining wall analysis includes determining the factor of safety for overturning, and sliding as well as the resultant location of the forces, which must be within the middle- third of the footing,. A concrete retaining wall is considered with a certain height and base width, and then analyzed for the static case as well as the earthquake loading condition. Based on this study, it is found that factor of safety obtained by Seed & Whitman method (1970) is lowest as compared to others methods.
This document provides a summary of the report "Seismic Analysis and Design of Retaining Walls, Buried Structures, Slopes, and Embankments". It details the development of analytical design procedures for the seismic design of these structures. The report was developed by analyzing existing literature and practices, identifying knowledge gaps, and developing recommended load and resistance factor design specifications, commentaries, and example problems. The specifications are intended to improve seismic design beyond the limitations of current AASHTO specifications for highway bridges and components.
Rock anchors have been used in the United States since the early 1960s as temporary tie backs and permanently in dams since 1968. Permanent anchors are designed to last up to 100 years with sophisticated corrosion protection systems. There are various types of permanent anchors including multi-strand systems with up to 27 strands and over 4000 kN of tension capacity, as well as permanent stressbar anchors and rock bolts used in infrastructure retention. Proper corrosion protection involving encapsulation and sheathing is necessary for permanent anchors to achieve their long design life.
The document provides design data for a retaining wall including soil density, surcharge loads, wall height, and allowable bearing capacity. The soil density is 18.86 kN/m3. Surcharge loads include traffic and a road and footpath above the wall. The wall height varies from 0.325m to 1.5m and is 0.5m wide at the base.
Reinforced and prestressed concrete kong & evansbridemcdamian
The document discusses the history of chocolate, describing how it originated from cacao beans grown by the Olmecs and Mayans in Mexico and Central America. It then explains how Spanish conquistadors brought cacao beans back to Europe in the 16th century and how chocolate became popularized as a drink among European nobility before eventually becoming widely consumed around the world today.
OPTIMUM DESIGN OF SEMI-GRAVITY RETAINING WALL SUBJECTED TO STATIC AND SEISMIC...IAEME Publication
A 2D (Plain strain) wall‒backfill‒foundation interaction is modeled using finite element
method by ANSYS to find the optimum design based on the principle of soil-structure
interactions analyses. A semi-gravity retaining wall subjected to static and seismic loads has
been considered in this research. Seismic records which are obtained from the records of Iraq
for the period 1900-1988. The optimization process is simulated by ANSYS /APDL language
programming depending on the available optimization commands. The objective function of
optimization process OBJ is to minimize the cross-sectional area of the retaining wall. The
results showed that the optimum design method via ANSYS is a successful strategy prompts to
optimum values of cross‒sectional area with both safety and stability factors as compared with
other optimum design methods. Also, the results showed that the area of optimum section by
ANSYS method is lesser than the section area of the GAs algorithm , PSO, and CSS methods by
percentages are equal to 15.04%, 23.92%, and 25.33%; respectively, when
3.Additionally, from studying the effect of some parameters such as Compressive Strength of
Concrete (´
) and Yielding Strength of Steel ( on cross-sectional area and reinforced
area, is provided that the (´) and have small effect or do not effect on the value of crosssectional
area () and this is due to the lack of weight ratio of steel reinforcement to concrete
weight. Moreover, the yielding strength of steel has larger effect than compressive strength of
concrete in the reinforcement area.
This document discusses different types of retaining walls and their design considerations. It describes:
1. Gravity, cantilever, counterfort, and buttress retaining wall types based on their structural components and typical height ranges.
2. Design considerations for retaining walls including stability against overturning, sliding, and settlement; drainage; and structural design basis using load and safety factors.
3. An example problem showing calculations for earth pressure, restoring moments, and checking stability of a gravity wall.
This document discusses counterfort retaining walls. It defines a retaining wall and lists common types, focusing on counterfort retaining walls. It describes the components and mechanics of counterfort walls, noting they are more economical than cantilever walls for heights over 6 meters. The document also covers forces acting on retaining walls, methods for calculating active and passive earth pressures, and stability conditions walls must satisfy including factors of safety against overturning and sliding and limiting maximum pressure at the base.
The document discusses various types of retaining walls and their failure modes. It describes gravity, semi-gravity, cantilever, counterfort, and buttress retaining walls. The five modes of failure are identified as sliding, overturning, bearing capacity, shallow shear, and deep shear failures. Factors of safety are provided for each failure mode. Two case studies of retaining wall collapses are also summarized.
Prestressed concrete is concrete that is placed under compression using tensioned steel strands, cables, or bars. This is done through either pre-tensioning or post-tensioning. In pre-tensioning, the steel components are tensioned before the concrete is poured, while in post-tensioning, the steel components are tensioned after the concrete has hardened. Prestressed concrete provides benefits over reinforced concrete like lower construction costs, thinner structural elements, and longer spans between supports.
Retaining walls are structures designed to retain earth and prevent it from sliding down slopes. They provide lateral support and hold back earthfill, embankments, and other materials in a vertical position. There are various types of retaining walls that differ based on their materials, structure, and means of stability. Common types include gravity walls, cantilever walls, counterfort walls, buttress walls, sheet pile walls, soldier pile and lagging walls, slurry walls, secant pile walls, crib walls, gabion walls, and mechanically stabilized earth walls. Proper design of a retaining wall requires consideration of the earth pressures acting on it, including active and passive pressures, and ensuring adequate drainage.
A study on the construction process (Precast concrete, In-situ cast concrete,...Bhaddin Al-Naqshabandi
This document provides an overview of precast concrete construction, in-situ cast concrete construction, shoring, and underpinning. It describes that precast concrete elements are cast off-site and include items like slabs, beams, and wall panels. In-situ concrete is poured on-site and can form any shape but requires more time and resources. Shoring uses temporary structures like rakers to support unstable structures during construction. Underpinning strengthens existing foundations, for example by adding new piles or walls underneath for additional support.
This document describes cantilever retaining walls. It defines a retaining wall as a structure that maintains ground surfaces at different elevations on either side. Cantilever retaining walls consist of a stem supported by a base and resist lateral forces through bending. The document discusses the types of forces acting on retaining walls, methods for calculating lateral earth pressures, and design considerations for stability, soil pressure distribution, and reinforcement in the stem, toe slab, and heel slab.
This document provides details of a proposed retaining wall, including dimensions, material properties, and calculations of forces and moments acting on the wall according to Eurocode 7. Key details include a propped cantilever retaining wall with a stem height of 5.5m, retaining loose gravel soil up to 5m high. Calculations show total vertical and horizontal forces of 778.7kN/m and 339.2kN/m respectively. The maximum bearing pressure on the wall foundation is calculated to be 0kPa with no eccentricity of loading.
Sachpazis: Reinforced Concrete Beam Analysis & Design Example (EN1992-1-3)Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides details for the analysis and design of a reinforced concrete beam according to Eurocode 2 (EN1992-1). It includes the beam geometry, material properties, applied loads and load combinations, analysis results for shear and bending moment, and design checks for flexure, shear, and crack control. The beam has three spans supported by A, B, and C and is designed as a rectangular section with 4 top and 2 bottom bars. Design checks are provided for the critical cross sections at supports A and the maximum shear location.
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides an analysis and design of a raft foundation for a two-story house project. It includes definitions of the soil properties, raft slab geometry, reinforcement, and other structural elements. Calculations are shown for checks of internal slab bearing pressure, bending moments, shear forces, and reinforcement requirements in accordance with relevant code standards. The analysis confirms that the applied bearing pressure is less than the allowable soil pressure and that the provided reinforcement is adequate.
This document provides details of a pad footing analysis and design according to BS8110-1:1997. It includes specifications of the pad footing, column, soil properties, loads, and calculations to check stability, reactions, pressures, and moments. The analysis determines that the maximum base pressure is less than the allowable bearing pressure and all other checks pass requirements.
Masonry column with eccentric vertical loading Analysis & Design, in accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005 incorporating corrigenda February 2006 and July 2009 and the recommended values.
Sachpazis: Steel member design in biaxial bending and axial compression examp...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides a summary of the design of a steel member according to Eurocode 3. It includes:
- Details of the steel section being designed, including dimensions, material properties, and classification.
- Checks for shear, bending, axial compression, and buckling according to Eurocode 3, ensuring the design capacities exceed the design forces in each case.
- A summary of the design confirming the steel member meets all requirements for its intended loading based on the specifications in Eurocode 3.
Sachpazis: Masonry wall panel design example (EN1996 1-1-2005)Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document summarizes the design of an unreinforced masonry wall panel according to EN1996-1-1:2005. It provides details of the wall geometry, material properties, loads, and design calculations for strength and serviceability limit states. The calculations show the wall satisfies the strength and serviceability requirements for vertical loading and lateral wind loading according to the code.
The document summarizes the design of a surface water drain. It provides details of the design flow rate, length and fall of the drain. Using the Chezy, Escritt and Colebrook-White equations, it calculates the minimum pipe diameter as 900mm to accommodate the design flow rate of 5 cubic meters per second with a flow velocity greater than 0.75 meters per second.
OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR HIGHWAY EMBANKMENT WITH STONE COLUMNIAEME Publication
In this paper discusses how to design the highway embankment with an optimum process to
get a minimum area of the highway embankment to reduce the cost of construction, and the
problems of soft clay soil in southern of Iraq when construction highway embankment as low
bearing capacity and excessive settlement and the way to treat it.At beginning a model of the
high way embankment without improving of soft clay soil for height of highway embankments
(H=2m and H=3m) was built to note the problems which will be faced when construction of
highway embankment in the future. When the height of embankment is (H=2m) the excessive
settlement appears but when the height of embankment is (H=3m) the low bearing capacity as
well as the excessive settlement will appear. To avoid these problems, the soft clay soil will be
improved by using stone columns and design the stone columns also with optimum process to
get minimum area of stone columns that can carry the applied load without any problem like
low bearing capacity or excessive settlement with lowest cost. When the stone columns are
used to improve the soft clay soil, it can note reduce in settlement by (99%) for height of
highway embankment (H=2m), and increase in bearing capacity to (15%) for height of
highway embankment (H=3m) for certain diameter as minimum increase can carry the load
applied on foundation. The highway embankment with stone column modeling with ANSYS
software program and this program very useful to help to find optimum design by optimization
tool, and use geo slope program to find slope stability for highway embankment by Bishop’s
method.
The document describes an experimental study comparing the ultimate load capacity of soil nailing walls with horizontal nails versus inclined nails in cohesionless soil. The study involves constructing small-scale soil nailing walls in a laboratory tank using steel bars as nails in poorly graded sand at 50% relative density. Nail inclination angles of 10 and 15 degrees will be tested and compared to horizontal nailing (0 degrees). The length-to-height ratio of nails will also be varied. Maximum load will be measured at failure. Analytical calculations of factor of safety for soil nailed walls will also be performed and compared to experimental results. The goal is to evaluate how nail inclination and length-to-height ratio affect ultimate load capacity.
Similar to Sachpazis: Sloped rear face retaining wall example (15)
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Terzaghi's soil bearing capacity theory, developed by Karl Terzaghi, is a fundamental principle in geotechnical engineering used to determine the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. This theory provides a method to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of soil, which is the maximum load per unit area that the soil can support without undergoing shear failure. The Calculation HTML Code included.
Seismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas SachpazisDr.Costas Sachpazis
This simple Python software is designed to assist Civil and Geotechnical Engineers in performing site-specific seismic hazard assessments. The program calculates the seismic response spectrum based on user-provided geotechnical and seismic parameters, generating a comprehensive technical report that includes the response spectrum data and figures. The analysis adheres to Eurocode 8 and the Greek Annex, ensuring compliance with international standards for earthquake-resistant design.
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for Students and Professionals.
Unlock the potential of foundation design with Dr. Costas Sachpazis’s enlightening handbook, a meticulously crafted guide poised to become an indispensable resource for both budding and seasoned civil engineers. This comprehensive manual illuminates the theoretical and practical aspects of structural analysis and design across various types of foundations and retaining walls.
Within these pages, Dr. Sachpazis distills complex engineering principles into digestible, step-by-step processes, enhanced by detailed diagrams, case studies, and real-world examples that bridge the gap between academic study and professional application. From soil mechanics and load calculations to innovative design techniques and sustainability considerations, this book covers a vast landscape of structural engineering.
Key Features:
• In-Depth Analysis and Design: Explore thorough explanations of both shallow and deep foundation designs, supported by case studies that demonstrate their practical implementations.
• Practical Guides: Benefit from detailed guides on site investigation, bearing capacity calculations, and settlement analysis, ensuring designs are both robust and reliable.
• Innovative Techniques: Discover the latest advancements in foundation technology and retaining wall design, preparing you for future trends in civil engineering.
• Educational Tools: Utilize this handbook as an educational tool, perfect for both classroom learning and professional development.
Whether you're a student eager to learn the fundamentals or a professional seeking to deepen your expertise, Dr. Sachpazis’s handbook is designed to support and inspire excellence in the field of structural engineering. Embrace this opportunity to enhance your skills and contribute to building safer, more efficient structures.
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineers. By Dr. Costas Sachpazis.
A Technical Report provides information on Geotechnical Exploration and testing procedures, analysis techniques, allowable criteria, design procedures, and construction consideration for the selection, design, and installation of sheet pile walls.
"Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineers" by Dr. Costas Sachpazis provides an in-depth look into the engineering, design, and construction of sheet pile walls. The book details geotechnical exploration, testing procedures, and analysis techniques essential for determining soil properties and stability under various conditions, including seismic activity. It also covers the impact of groundwater on wall design and offers methods for controlling it during construction. Practical considerations for confined space work and the use of emerging technologies in sheet pile construction are discussed. The guide serves as a comprehensive resource for civil engineers aiming to enhance their expertise in creating durable and effective sheet pile wall solutions for complex engineering projects.
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionDr.Costas Sachpazis
Geotechnical Engineering: A Student's Perspective
By Dr. Costas Sachpazis.
Geotechnical engineering is a branch of civil engineering that focuses on the behavior of earth materials such as soil and rock. It is a crucial aspect of any construction project, as the properties of the ground can have a significant impact on the design and stability of structures. Geotechnical engineers work to understand the physical and mechanical properties of soil and rock, as well as how these materials interact with man-made structures.
Geotechnical engineering plays a crucial role in the field of civil engineering, as it deals with the behavior of earth materials and how they interact with structures. Understanding the properties of soil and rock beneath the surface is essential for designing safe and stable structures that can withstand various loads and environmental conditions. Without proper knowledge of geotechnical engineering, civil engineers would not be able to ensure the safety and longevity of their projects.
Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document summarizes the fire resistance design of a steel member according to EN1993-1-2:2005. The design checks the member for shear, bending moment, temperature, and time to critical temperature under fire conditions. The summary shows the member passes all criteria with utilization levels below 1.0. Key details of the member, loading, fire protection, and temperature analysis are provided.
Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
A retaining wall is a structure that is designed to hold back soil or other materials when there is a change in ground elevation. Retaining walls are commonly used in civil engineering to support soil and prevent erosion. They are typically constructed of various materials, including concrete, masonry, and timber.
Retaining walls are used in a variety of settings, including residential and commercial construction, roadways and highways, and landscaping projects. They are often used to create level areas for building or landscaping by holding back soil or other materials on sloping terrain.
The design of a retaining wall depends on several factors, including the type of soil, the height of the wall, and the slope of the ground. There are several types of retaining walls, including gravity walls, cantilever walls, sheet pile walls, and anchored walls. The type of wall used depends on the specific requirements of the project.
Overall, retaining walls are an important component of civil engineering projects and are used to support soil and prevent erosion. They require careful design and construction to ensure their stability and effectiveness.
Single pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.SachpazisDr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides input data and analysis for the design of a single pile with a length of 18 meters and diameter of 1.1 meters. It includes soil parameters, load assumptions, and analysis of the pile's vertical and horizontal bearing capacity. The analysis found the pile has adequate bearing capacity for the applied loads with a maximum settlement of 3.2 mm under the service load condition.
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundationsDr.Costas Sachpazis
By: Birhanu Asefa, Eleyas Assefa, Lysandros Pantelidis,Costas Sachpazis
This paper examines the impact of different pile configurations and geometric parameters on the bearing capacity and the settlement response of a combined pile–raft foundation system utilizing FLAC3D software. The configurations considered were: (1) uniform piles (denoted as CONF1), (2) shorter and longer piles uniformly distributed on the plan view of the raft (CONF2), (3) shorter piles at the center and longer piles at the edge of the raft (CONF3), and (4) longer piles at the center and shorter piles at the edge of the raft (CONF4). In the same framework, different pile diameters and raft stiffnesses were examined. The piles are considered to float in a cohesive–frictional soil mass, simulating the thick cohesive soil deposit found in Addis Abeba (Ethiopia). During simulation, a zero-thickness interface element was employed to incorporate the complex interaction between the soil elements and the structural elements. The analyses indicate that the configuration of piles has a considerable effect on both the bearing capacity and the settlement response of the foundation system. CONF1 and CONF3 improve the bearing capacity and exhibits a smaller average settlement than other configurations. However, CONF3 registers the highest differential settlement. On the other hand, the lowest differential settlement was achieved by the CONF4 configuration; the same configuration also gives ultimate load resistance comparable to those provided by either CONF1 or CONF3. The study also showed that applying zero-thickness interface elements to simulate the interaction between components of the foundation system is suitable for examining piled raft foundations problem.
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής ΕνέργειαςDr.Costas Sachpazis
Σαχπάζης: Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας.
Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Από Κώστα Σαχπάζη, Πολιτικό Μηχανικό, καθηγητή Πολυτεχνικής Σχολής στην Γεωτεχνική Μηχανική
Η αιολική ενέργεια προσφέρει πολλά πλεονεκτήματα, κάτι που εξηγεί γιατί είναι μια από τις ταχύτερα αναπτυσσόμενες πηγές ενέργειας στον κόσμο. Οι ερευνητικές προσπάθειες αποσκοπούν στην αντιμετώπιση των προκλήσεων για μεγαλύτερη χρήση της αιολικής ενέργειας.
Καθώς είναι πιο καθαρή και φιλική προς το κλίμα, η Αιολική Ενέργεια χρησιμοποιείται ολοένα και περισσότερο για να καλύψει τις συνεχώς αυξανόμενες παγκόσμιες ενεργειακές απαιτήσεις. Στην Ελλάδα, υπάρχει ένα μεγάλο κενό μεταξύ των Αιολικών Πόρων και της πραγματικής παραγωγής ενέργειας, και είναι επιτακτική ανάγκη να επεκταθεί η ανάπτυξη της αιολικής ενέργειας, ιδιαίτερα στις ημέρες μας μετά από την Νέα Εποχή της Απολιγνιτοποίησης που έχουμε εισέλθει με βάση τις προσταγές και τους νόμους της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.
Ας δούμε όμως παρακάτω περισσότερα για τα οφέλη της αιολικής ενέργειας και μερικές από τις προκλήσεις που προσπαθεί να ξεπεράσει:
Πλεονεκτήματα της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
1) The document provides details of a circular column pile design including input parameters such as pile dimensions, safety factors, design parameters, settlement parameters, and layer properties.
2) It summarizes the calculations of layer capacities, total capacities, design capacities, and settlement at service and ultimate limit states.
3) Key outputs include a design load of 3600 kN, a calculated capacity of 5527.83 kN, an Everett settlement of 3.43 mm at SLS and 5.21 mm at ULS, and a required reinforcement area of 2544.69 mm2.
Παράδειγμα ανάλυσης και σχεδίασης Ζευκτών (Trusses) σύμφωνα με τον Ευρωκώδικα EC3, του Δρ. Κώστα Σαχπάζη.
Truss Analysis and Design example to EC3, by Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Differential settlement occurs when different parts of a building's foundation settle by different amounts, causing the building to sink unevenly. This can be caused by variations in soil strength or compaction issues. Uniform settlement across a building is expected over time but differential settlement can damage a building's structure. Signs may include cracks, sticking doors and windows, and leaning walls. Proper site inspection and using deep foundations like helical piers in expansive soils can help prevent differential settlement issues.
Retaining walls are relatively rigid walls used for supporting soil laterally so that it can be retained at different levels on the two sides. Retaining walls are structures designed to restrain soil to a slope that it would not naturally keep to (typically a steep, near-vertical or vertical slope). They are used to bound soils between two different elevations often in areas of terrain possessing undesirable slopes or in areas where the landscape needs to be shaped severely and engineered for more specific purposes like hillside farming or roadway overpasses. A retaining wall that retains soil on the backside and water on the frontside is called a seawall or a bulkhead.
Sachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About Dams.
A dam is a barrier that stops or restricts the flow of water or underground streams. Reservoirs created by dams not only suppress floods but also provide water for activities such as irrigation, human consumption, industrial use, aquaculture, and navigability. Hydropower is often used in conjunction with dams to generate electricity. A dam can also be used to collect water or for storage of water which can be evenly distributed between locations. Dams generally serve the primary purpose of retaining water, while other structures such as floodgates or levees (also known as dikes) are used to manage or prevent water flow into specific land regions. The earliest known dam is the Jawa Dam in Jordan, dating to 3,000 BC.
https://payhip.com/b/oCu8
ARENA - Young adults in the workplace (Knight Moves).pdfKnight Moves
Presentations of Bavo Raeymaekers (Project lead youth unemployment at the City of Antwerp), Suzan Martens (Service designer at Knight Moves) and Adriaan De Keersmaeker (Community manager at Talk to C)
during the 'Arena • Young adults in the workplace' conference hosted by Knight Moves.
Practical eLearning Makeovers for EveryoneBianca Woods
Welcome to Practical eLearning Makeovers for Everyone. In this presentation, we’ll take a look at a bunch of easy-to-use visual design tips and tricks. And we’ll do this by using them to spruce up some eLearning screens that are in dire need of a new look.
Discovering the Best Indian Architects A Spotlight on Design Forum Internatio...Designforuminternational
India’s architectural landscape is a vibrant tapestry that weaves together the country's rich cultural heritage and its modern aspirations. From majestic historical structures to cutting-edge contemporary designs, the work of Indian architects is celebrated worldwide. Among the many firms shaping this dynamic field, Design Forum International stands out as a leader in innovative and sustainable architecture. This blog explores some of the best Indian architects, highlighting their contributions and showcasing the most famous architects in India.
Maximize Your Content with Beautiful Assets : Content & Asset for Landing Page pmgdscunsri
Figma is a cloud-based design tool widely used by designers for prototyping, UI/UX design, and real-time collaboration. With features such as precision pen tools, grid system, and reusable components, Figma makes it easy for teams to work together on design projects. Its flexibility and accessibility make Figma a top choice in the digital age.
Explore the essential graphic design tools and software that can elevate your creative projects. Discover industry favorites and innovative solutions for stunning design results.
International Upcycling Research Network advisory board meeting 4Kyungeun Sung
Slides used for the International Upcycling Research Network advisory board 4 (last one). The project is based at De Montfort University in Leicester, UK, and funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council.
EASY TUTORIAL OF HOW TO USE CAPCUT BY: FEBLESS HERNANEFebless Hernane
CapCut is an easy-to-use video editing app perfect for beginners. To start, download and open CapCut on your phone. Tap "New Project" and select the videos or photos you want to edit. You can trim clips by dragging the edges, add text by tapping "Text," and include music by selecting "Audio." Enhance your video with filters and effects from the "Effects" menu. When you're happy with your video, tap the export button to save and share it. CapCut makes video editing simple and fun for everyone!
Sachpazis: Sloped rear face retaining wall example
1. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
App'd by
Date
RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS
In accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February
2009 and the recommended values
Retaining wall details
Stem type;
Cantilever with inclined rear face
Stem height;
hstem = 4700 mm
Stem thickness;
tstem = 300 mm
Slope length to rear of stem;
lslr = 400 mm
Angle to rear face of stem;
α = atan(hstem / lslr) = 85.1 deg
Stem density;
γstem = 25 kN/m
3
Toe length;
ltoe = 3000 mm
Heel length;
lheel = 2500 mm
Base thickness;
tbase = 550 mm
Key position;
pkey = 5700 mm
Key depth;
dkey = 500 mm
Key thickness;
tkey = 500 mm
Base density;
γbase = 25 kN/m
Height of retained soil;
hret = 4000 mm
3
Angle of soil surface;
β = 10 deg
Depth of cover;
dcover = 700 mm
Depth of excavation;
dexc = 700 mm
Height of water;
hwater = 500 mm
2. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Calc. by
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Water density;
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
γw = 9.8 kN/m
3
Retained soil properties
Soil type;
Organic clay
Moist density;
γmr = 15 kN/m
Saturated density;
γsr = 16 kN/m
Characteristic effective shear resistance angle;
φ'r.k = 29 deg
Characteristic wall friction angle;
δr.k = 16 deg
3
3
Base soil properties
Soil type;
Organic clay
Moist density;
γmb = 17 kN/m
Characteristic cohesion;
c'b.k = 55 kN/m
3
2
2
Characteristic adhesion;
ab.k = 52 kN/m
Characteristic effective shear resistance angle;
φ'b.k = 26 deg
Characteristic wall friction angle;
δb.k = 15 deg
Characteristic base friction angle;
δbb.k = 26 deg
Loading details
Variable surcharge load;
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
SurchargeQ = 10 kN/m
2
App'd by
Date
3. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
22/12/2013
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Date
4. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
App'd by
Date
Calculate retaining wall geometry
Base length;
lbase = ltoe + tstem + lslr + lheel = 6200 mm
Base height;
hbase = tbase + dkey = 1050 mm
Saturated soil height;
hsat = hwater + dcover = 1200 mm
Moist soil height;
hmoist = hret - hwater = 3500 mm
Length of surcharge load;
lsur = (lheel + lslr × hsoil / hstem) = 2900 mm
- Distance to vertical component;
xsur_v = lbase - (lheel + lslr × hsoil / hstem) / 2 = 4750 mm
Effective height of wall;
heff = hbase + dcover + hret + lsur × tan(β) = 6261 mm
- Distance to horizontal component;
xsur_h = heff / 2 - dkey = 2631 mm
Area of wall stem;
Astem = hstem × (tstem + lslr / 2) = 2.35 m
2
- Distance to vertical component;
xstem = (hstem × tstem × (ltoe + tstem / 2) + hstem × lslr / 2 × (ltoe + tstem + lslr / 3)) / Astem = 3263 mm
Area of wall base;
Abase = lbase × tbase + dkey × tkey = 3.66 m
- Distance to vertical component;
xbase = (lbase × tbase / 2 + dkey × tkey × (pkey + tkey / 2)) / Abase = 3295 mm
Area of saturated soil;
Asat = hsat × (lheel + lslr × hsat / (2 × hstem)) = 3.061 m
- Distance to vertical component;
xsat_v = lbase - (hsat × lheel / 2 + lslr × hsat / (2 × hstem) × (lheel + lslr × hsat / (3 × hstem))) / Asat = 4924 mm
- Distance to horizontal component;
xsat_h = (hsat + hbase) / 3 - dkey = 250 mm
Area of water;
Awater = hsat × (lheel + lslr × hsat / (2 × hstem)) = 3.061 m
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
lheel
2
- Distance to vertical component;
xwater_v = lbase - (hsat ×
/ 2 + lslr × hsat / (2 × hstem) × (lheel + lslr × hsat / (3 × hstem))) / Asat = 4924 mm
- Distance to horizontal component;
xwater_h = (hsat + hbase) / 3 - dkey = 250 mm
Area of moist soil;
Amoist = (hret - hwater) × (lheel + lslr × (hmoist + 2 × hsat) / (2 × hstem)) + tan(β) × (lheel + lslr × hsoil / hstem) / 2 =
2
2
10.37 m
- Distance to vertical component;
2
2
xmoist_v = lbase - (hmoist × (lheel + lslr × hsat / hstem) / 2 + lslr × hmoist / (2 × hstem) × ((lheel + lslr × hsat / hstem) + lslr ×
3
hmoist / (3 × hstem)) + tan(β) × (lheel + lslr × hsoil / hstem) / 6) / Amoist = 4852 mm
- Distance to horizontal component;
xmoist_h = ((heff - hsat - hbase) × (tbase + hsat + (heff - hsat - hbase) / 3) / 2 + (hsat + hbase) × ((hsat + hbase)/2 - dkey)) /
(hsat + hbase + (heff - hsat - hbase) / 2) = 1785 mm
5. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Area of base soil;
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
App'd by
Date
2
Apass = dcover × ltoe = 2.1 m
- Distance to vertical component;
xpass_v = lbase - (dcover × ltoe× (lbase - ltoe / 2)) / Apass = 1500 mm
- Distance to horizontal component;
xpass_h = (dcover + hbase) / 3- dkey = 83 mm
Partial factors on actions - Table A.3 - Combination 1
Permanent unfavourable action;
γG = 1.35
Permanent favourable action;
γGf = 1.00
Variable unfavourable action;
γQ = 1.50
Variable favourable action;
γQf = 0.00
Partial factors for soil parameters – Table A.4 - Combination 1
Angle of shearing resistance;
γφ' = 1.00
Effective cohesion;
γc' = 1.00
Weight density;
γγ = 1.00
Retained soil properties
Design effective shear resistance angle;
φ'r.d = atan(tan(φ'r.k) / γφ') = 29 deg
Design wall friction angle;
δr.d = atan(tan(δr.k) / γφ') = 16 deg
Base soil properties
Design effective shear resistance angle;
φ'b.d = atan(tan(φ'b.k) / γφ') = 26 deg
Design wall friction angle;
δb.d = atan(tan(δb.k) / γφ') = 15 deg
Design base friction angle;
δbb.d = atan(tan(δbb.k) / γφ') = 26 deg
Design effective cohesion;
c'b.d = c'b.k / γc' = 55 kN/m
Design adhesion;
2
2
ab.d = ab.k / γc' = 52 kN/m
Using Coulomb theory
Active pressure coefficient;
2
2
2
KA = sin(α + φ'r.d) / (sin(α) × sin(α - δr.d) × [1 + √[sin(φ'r.d + δr.d) × sin(φ'r.d - β) / (sin(α - δr.d) × sin(α + β))]] )
= 0.400
14. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Load inclination factors;
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
App'd by
Date
H = Ftotal_h = 0 kN/m
V = Ftotal_v = 428.2 kN/m
m=2
m
iq = [1 - H / (V + lload × c'b.d × cot(φ'b.d))] = 1
(m + 1)
iγ = [1 - H / (V + lload × c'b.d × cot(φ'b.d))]
=1
ic = iq - (1 - iq) / (Nc × tan(φ'b.d)) = 1
Net ultimate bearing capacity;
nf = c'b.d × Nc × sc × ic + q' × Nq × sq × iq + 0.5 × (γmb - γw) × lload × Nγ × sγ × iγ = 843 kN/m
Factor of safety;
2
FoSbp = nf / max(qtoe, qheel) = 11.471
PASS - Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressure
RETAINING WALL DESIGN
In accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated
January 2008 and the recommended values
Concrete details - Table 3.1 - Strength and deformation characteristics for concrete
Concrete strength class;
C32/40
Characteristic compressive cylinder strength;
fck = 32 N/mm
Characteristic compressive cube strength;
fck,cube = 40 N/mm
Mean value of compressive cylinder strength;
fcm = fck + 8 N/mm = 40 N/mm
Mean value of axial tensile strength;
fctm = 0.3 N/mm × (fck / 1 N/mm )
2
2
2
2
2
2 2/3
= 3.0 N/mm
2
2
5% fractile of axial tensile strength;
fctk,0.05 = 0.7 × fctm = 2.1 N/mm
Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete;
Ecm = 22 kN/mm × (fcm / 10 N/mm )
Partial factor for concrete - Table 2.1N;
γC = 1.50
2
2 0.3
2
= 33346 N/mm
15. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
Compressive strength coefficient - cl.3.1.6(1);
fcd = αcc × fck / γC = 21.3 N/mm
Maximum aggregate size;
Date
αcc = 1.00
Design compressive concrete strength - exp.3.15;
App'd by
hagg = 20 mm
2
Reinforcement details
2
Characteristic yield strength of reinforcement;
fyk = 500 N/mm
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcement;
Es = 200000 N/mm
Partial factor for reinforcing steel - Table 2.1N;
γS = 1.15
Design yield strength of reinforcement;
fyd = fyk / γS = 435 N/mm
2
2
Cover to reinforcement
Front face of stem;
csf = 40 mm
Rear face of stem;
csr = 50 mm
Top face of base;
cbt = 50 mm
Bottom face of base;
cbb = 75 mm
Check stem design at base of stem
Depth of section;
h = 700 mm
Rectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1
Design bending moment combination 1;
M = 243.2 kNm/m
Depth to tension reinforcement;
d = h - csr - φsr / 2 = 640 mm
2
K = M / (d × fck) = 0.019
K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
0.5
Lever arm;
z = min(0.5 + 0.5 × (1 – 3.53 × K) , 0.95) × d = 608 mm
Depth of neutral axis;
x = 2.5 × (d – z) = 80 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required;
Asr.req = M / (fyd × z) = 920 mm /m
Tension reinforcement provided;
20 dia.bars @ 200 c/c
2
16. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
2
App'd by
Date
2
Area of tension reinforcement provided;
Asr.prov = π × φsr / (4 × ssr) = 1571 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N;
Asr.min = max(0.26 × fctm / fyk, 0.0013) × d = 1006 mm /m
Maximum area of reinforcement - cl.9.2.1.1(3);
2
2
Asr.max = 0.04 × h = 28000 mm /m
max(Asr.req, Asr.min) / Asr.prov = 0.641
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control - Section 7.3
Limiting crack width;
wmax = 0.3 mm
Variable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1;
ψ2 = 0.3
Serviceability bending moment;
Msls = 146.7 kNm/m
Tensile stress in reinforcement;
σs = Msls / (Asr.prov × z) = 153.6 N/mm
Load duration;
Long term
Load duration factor;
kt = 0.4
Effective area of concrete in tension;
Ac.eff = min(2.5 × (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) = 150000 mm /m
2
2
2
Mean value of concrete tensile strength;
fct.eff = fctm = 3.0 N/mm
Reinforcement ratio;
ρp.eff = Asr.prov / Ac.eff = 0.010
Modular ratio;
αe = Es / Ecm = 5.998
Bond property coefficient;
k1 = 0.8
Strain distribution coefficient;
k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4
k4 = 0.425
Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11;
sr.max = k3 × csr + k1 × k2 × k4 × φsr / ρp.eff = 495 mm
Maximum crack width - exp.7.8;
wk = sr.max × max(σs – kt × (fct.eff / ρp.eff) × (1 + αe × ρp.eff), 0.6 × σs) / Es
wk = 0.228 mm
wk / wmax = 0.76
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
17. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
App'd by
Date
Rectangular section in shear - Section 6.2
Design shear force;
V = 135.6 kN/m
CRd,c = 0.18 / γC = 0.120
k = min(1 + √(200 mm / d), 2) = 1.559
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio;
ρl = min(Asr.prov / d, 0.02) = 0.002
1/2
vmin = 0.035 N /mm × k
Design shear resistance - exp.6.2a & 6.2b;
3/2
0.5
× fck
2
2
= 0.385 N/mm
4
1/3
VRd.c = max(CRd.c × k × (100 N /mm × ρl × fck) , vmin) × d
VRd.c = 246.7 kN/m
V / VRd.c = 0.550
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Horizontal reinforcement parallel to face of stem - Section 9.6
2
Minimum area of reinforcement – cl.9.6.3(1);
Asx.req = max(0.25 × Asr.prov, 0.001 × (tstem + lslr)) = 700 mm /m
Maximum spacing of reinforcement – cl.9.6.3(2);
ssx_max = 400 mm
Transverse reinforcement provided;
16 dia.bars @ 200 c/c
Area of transverse reinforcement provided;
Asx.prov = π × φsx / (4 × ssx) = 1005 mm /m
2
2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Check base design
Depth of section;
h = 550 mm
Rectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1
Design bending moment combination 2;
M = 138.1 kNm/m
Depth to tension reinforcement;
d = h - cbb - φbb / 2 = 465 mm
2
K = M / (d × fck) = 0.020
K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Lever arm;
0.5
z = min(0.5 + 0.5 × (1 – 3.53 × K) , 0.95) × d = 442 mm
18. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
Depth of neutral axis;
Abb.req = M / (fyd × z) = 719 mm /m
Tension reinforcement provided;
20 dia.bars @ 200 c/c
Area of tension reinforcement provided;
Abb.prov = π × φbb / (4 × sbb) = 1571 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N;
Abb.min = max(0.26 × fctm / fyk, 0.0013) × d = 731 mm /m
Maximum area of reinforcement - cl.9.2.1.1(3);
Date
x = 2.5 × (d – z) = 58 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required;
App'd by
Abb.max = 0.04 × h = 22000 mm /m
2
2
2
2
2
max(Abb.req, Abb.min) / Abb.prov = 0.465
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control - Section 7.3
Limiting crack width;
wmax = 0.3 mm
Variable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1;
ψ2 = 0.3
Serviceability bending moment;
Msls = 85.4 kNm/m
Tensile stress in reinforcement;
σs = Msls / (Abb.prov × z) = 123 N/mm
2
Load duration;
Long term
Load duration factor;
kt = 0.4
Effective area of concrete in tension;
Ac.eff = min(2.5 × (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) = 163958 mm /m
Mean value of concrete tensile strength;
fct.eff = fctm = 3.0 N/mm
Reinforcement ratio;
ρp.eff = Abb.prov / Ac.eff = 0.010
2
2
Modular ratio;
αe = Es / Ecm = 5.998
Bond property coefficient;
k1 = 0.8
Strain distribution coefficient;
k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4
k4 = 0.425
Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11;
sr.max = k3 × cbb + k1 × k2 × k4 × φbb / ρp.eff = 610 mm
Maximum crack width - exp.7.8;
wk = sr.max × max(σs – kt × (fct.eff / ρp.eff) × (1 + αe × ρp.eff), 0.6 × σs) / Es
wk = 0.225 mm
19. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
App'd by
Date
wk / wmax = 0.75
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Rectangular section in shear - Section 6.2
Design shear force;
V = 135.7 kN/m
CRd,c = 0.18 / γC = 0.120
k = min(1 + √(200 mm / d), 2) = 1.656
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio;
ρl = min(Abb.prov / d, 0.02) = 0.003
1/2
vmin = 0.035 N /mm × k
Design shear resistance - exp.6.2a & 6.2b;
3/2
0.5
2
× fck
= 0.422 N/mm
2
4
1/3
VRd.c = max(CRd.c × k × (100 N /mm × ρl × fck) , vmin) × d
VRd.c = 204.3 kN/m
V / VRd.c = 0.664
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Rectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1
Design bending moment combination 1;
M = 126.1 kNm/m
Depth to tension reinforcement;
d = h - cbt - φbt / 2 = 492 mm
2
K = M / (d × fck) = 0.016
K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Lever arm;
0.5
z = min(0.5 + 0.5 × (1 – 3.53 × K) , 0.95) × d = 467 mm
Depth of neutral axis;
x = 2.5 × (d – z) = 62 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required;
Abt.req = M / (fyd × z) = 621 mm /m
2
Tension reinforcement provided;
16 dia.bars @ 200 c/c
Area of tension reinforcement provided;
Abt.prov = π × φbt / (4 × sbt) = 1005 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N;
Abt.min = max(0.26 × fctm / fyk, 0.0013) × d = 774 mm /m
Maximum area of reinforcement - cl.9.2.1.1(3);
2
2
2
2
Abt.max = 0.04 × h = 22000 mm /m
max(Abt.req, Abt.min) / Abt.prov = 0.77
20. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
App'd by
Date
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control - Section 7.3
Limiting crack width;
wmax = 0.3 mm
Variable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1;
ψ2 = 0.3
Serviceability bending moment;
Msls = 68.9 kNm/m
Tensile stress in reinforcement;
σs = Msls / (Abt.prov × z) = 146.7 N/mm
Load duration;
Long term
Load duration factor;
kt = 0.4
Effective area of concrete in tension;
Ac.eff = min(2.5 × (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) = 145000 mm /m
2
2
2
Mean value of concrete tensile strength;
fct.eff = fctm = 3.0 N/mm
Reinforcement ratio;
ρp.eff = Abt.prov / Ac.eff = 0.007
Modular ratio;
αe = Es / Ecm = 5.998
Bond property coefficient;
k1 = 0.8
Strain distribution coefficient;
k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4
k4 = 0.425
Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11;
sr.max = k3 × cbt + k1 × k2 × k4 × φbt / ρp.eff = 562 mm
Maximum crack width - exp.7.8;
wk = sr.max × max(σs – kt × (fct.eff / ρp.eff) × (1 + αe × ρp.eff), 0.6 × σs) / Es
wk = 0.247 mm
wk / wmax = 0.825
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Rectangular section in shear - Section 6.2
Design shear force;
V = 90.4 kN/m
CRd,c = 0.18 / γC = 0.120
k = min(1 + √(200 mm / d), 2) = 1.638
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio;
ρl = min(Abt.prov / d, 0.02) = 0.002
21. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
1/2
vmin = 0.035 N /mm × k
Design shear resistance - exp.6.2a & 6.2b;
3/2
0.5
× fck
2
App'd by
Date
2
= 0.415 N/mm
4
1/3
VRd.c = max(CRd.c × k × (100 N /mm × ρl × fck) , vmin) × d
VRd.c = 204.1 kN/m
V / VRd.c = 0.443
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Check key design
Depth of section;
h = 500 mm
Rectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1
Design bending moment combination 0;
M = 7.1 kNm/m
Depth to tension reinforcement;
d = h - cbb - φk / 2 = 417 mm
2
K = M / (d × fck) = 0.001
K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
0.5
Lever arm;
z = min(0.5 + 0.5 × (1 – 3.53 × K) , 0.95) × d = 396 mm
Depth of neutral axis;
x = 2.5 × (d – z) = 52 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required;
Ak.req = M / (fyd × z) = 41 mm /m
2
Tension reinforcement provided;
16 dia.bars @ 200 c/c
Area of tension reinforcement provided;
Ak.prov = π × φk / (4 × sk) = 1005 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N;
Ak.min = max(0.26 × fctm / fyk, 0.0013) × d = 656 mm /m
Maximum area of reinforcement - cl.9.2.1.1(3);
Ak.max = 0.04 × h = 20000 mm /m
2
2
2
2
max(Ak.req, Ak.min) / Ak.prov = 0.652
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control - Section 7.3
Limiting crack width;
wmax = 0.3 mm
Variable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1;
ψ2 = 0.3
22. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
Serviceability bending moment;
Date
Msls = 7.1 kNm/m
Tensile stress in reinforcement;
App'd by
σs = Msls / (Ak.prov × z) = 17.7 N/mm
2
Load duration;
Long term
Load duration factor;
kt = 0.4
Effective area of concrete in tension;
Ac.eff = min(2.5 × (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) = 149292 mm /m
2
2
Mean value of concrete tensile strength;
fct.eff = fctm = 3.0 N/mm
Reinforcement ratio;
ρp.eff = Ak.prov / Ac.eff = 0.007
Modular ratio;
αe = Es / Ecm = 5.998
Bond property coefficient;
k1 = 0.8
Strain distribution coefficient;
k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4
k4 = 0.425
Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11;
sr.max = k3 × cbb + k1 × k2 × k4 × φk / ρp.eff = 659 mm
Maximum crack width - exp.7.8;
wk = sr.max × max(σs – kt × (fct.eff / ρp.eff) × (1 + αe × ρp.eff), 0.6 × σs) / Es
wk = 0.035 mm
wk / wmax = 0.117
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Rectangular section in shear - Section 6.2
Design shear force;
V = 26 kN/m
CRd,c = 0.18 / γC = 0.120
k = min(1 + √(200 mm / d), 2) = 1.693
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio;
ρl = min(Ak.prov / d, 0.02) = 0.002
1/2
vmin = 0.035 N /mm × k
Design shear resistance - exp.6.2a & 6.2b;
3/2
0.5
× fck
2
2
= 0.436 N/mm
4
1/3
VRd.c = max(CRd.c × k × (100 N /mm × ρl × fck) , vmin) × d
VRd.c = 181.8 kN/m
V / VRd.c = 0.143
23. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
22/12/2013
App'd by
Date
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Secondary transverse reinforcement to base - Section 9.3
Minimum area of reinforcement – cl.9.3.1.1(2);
2
Abx.req = 0.2 × Abb.prov = 314 mm /m
Maximum spacing of reinforcement – cl.9.3.1.1(3); sbx_max = 450 mm
Transverse reinforcement provided;
12 dia.bars @ 200 c/c
Area of transverse reinforcement provided;
Abx.prov = π × φbx / (4 × sbx) = 565 mm /m
2
2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
24. Job Ref.
Project: Sloped rear face retaining wall Analysis & Design, In accordance with
EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the
recommended values
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
22/12/2013
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Date