SlideShare a Scribd company logo
VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE
PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE
EUROCODE 2
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -
Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-1-1:2004
with NA=CEN.
Job Ref.
www.geodomisi.com
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Sheet no./rev. 1
Calc.
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
16/01/2016
Chk'd by
Date App'd by Date
INDEX
DESCRIPTION
CHECKS
1.- Zone adjacent to the support or load (Persistent situations) 3
2.- Zone with punching shear reinforcement (Persistent situations) 5
3.- External zone to the punching shear reinforecement (Persistent
situations) 7
4.- Punching shear reinforcement (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3(2)) 9
5.- Clear distance between two isolated consecutive bars 9
6.- Distance between the support's face and the first punching shear
reinforcement 10
7.- Distance between transverse consecutive reinforcement perimeters 10
8.- Distance between two consecutive reinforcements in peripheral direction 11
9.- Distance between the support's external face and the outermost bar
inclined at 45° 11
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461
Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
DESCRIPTION
Calculation of the punching shear perimeters
CHECKS
1.- Zone adjacent to the support or load (Persistent situations)
The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1.
The following criteria must be satisfied:
Where:
vEd: Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered.
vRd,max: Design value of the maximum punching shear resistance along the
control section considered.
The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained
from the following expression (EN 1992
Where:
VEd: Design value of the applied shear force.
Ed Rd,maxv v≤
Ed
Ed
0
V
v
u d
β ⋅
=
⋅
Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -
Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-
with NA=CEN.
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
16/01/2016
Chk'd by
Calculation of the punching shear perimeters
Perimeter of the s
u0:
Critical perimeter
u1:
xG:
yG:
W1x:
W1y:
Punching shear reinforcement perimeter
uout,ef:
xG:
yG:
Wout,ef,x:
Wout,ef,y:
Zone adjacent to the support or load (Persistent situations)
The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1.
The following criteria must be satisfied:
: Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered.
: Design value of the maximum punching shear resistance along the
of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained
from the following expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5):
: Design value of the applied shear force.
VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
-1-1:2004
Job Ref.
www.geodomisi.com
Sheet no./rev. 1
Date App'd by Date
Page 3 - 11
Perimeter of the support (C1)
1600 mm
Critical perimeter
4362 mm
0 mm
0 mm
19163.6 cm²
19163.6 cm²
Punching shear reinforcement perimeter
5031 mm
0 mm
0 mm
51487.8 cm²
51487.8 cm²
The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1.
2.43 MPa ≤≤≤≤ 4.50 MPa
vEd : 2.43 MPa
vRd,max : 4.50 MPa
of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained
vEd : 2.43 MPa
VEd : 756.75 kN
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -
Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-1-1:2004
with NA=CEN.
Job Ref.
www.geodomisi.com
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Sheet no./rev. 1
Calc.
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
16/01/2016
Chk'd by
Date App'd by Date
Page 4 - 11
ββββ: Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN
1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3). ββββ : 1.13
kx: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions
cy (dimension in direction of the y-axis) and cx (dimension in direction of the
x-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). kx : 0.60
ky: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions cx
(dimension in direction of the x-axis) and cy (dimension in direction of the
y-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). ky : 0.60
MEdx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity of
the critical perimeter u1. MEdx : 58.65 kN·m
MEdy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity of
the critical perimeter u1. MEdy : 12.30 kN·m
MEdOx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity of
the column. MEdOx : 58.65 kN·m
MEdOy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity of
the column. MEdOy : 12.30 kN·m
u1: Critical punching shear perimeter (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.2). u1 : 4362 mm
W1x : 19163.6 cm²
dl: Differential element of the critical perimeter length.
ey: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdx acts about.
W1y : 19163.6 cm²
ex: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdy acts about.
u0: Verification critical punching shear perimeter of the area adjacent to the
support or load (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5). u0 : 1600 mm
d: Nominal depth of the slab. d : 220 mm
The design value of the maximum punching shear resistance along the control section
considered is obtained from the following expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008,
6.4.5):
vRd,max : 4.50 MPa
νννν : 0.54
Where:
fck: Concrete compressive strength. fck : 25.00 MPa
EdyEdx 1 1
x y
Ed 1x Ed 1y
MM u u
1 k k
V W V W
β = + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅
1u
1x y
0
W e dl= ⋅∫
1u
1y x
0
W e dl= ⋅∫
Rd,max cdv 0.5 f= ⋅ ν ⋅
ckf
0.6 1
250
 
ν = ⋅ − 
 
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461
Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
fcd: Design value of the concrete compression force in the direction of
longitudinal member axis.
2.- Zone with punching shear reinforcement (Persistent situations)
The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1.
The following criteria must be satisfied:
Where:
vEd: Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered.
vRd,cs: Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab with punching
shear reinforcement along the control section cons
The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained
from the following expression (EN 1992
Where:
VEd: Design value of the applied shear force.
ββββ: Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN
1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3).
kx: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions
cy (dimension in direction of the y
the x-axis) of the column (EN 1992
ky: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions
cx (dimension in direction of the x
the y-axis) of the column (EN 1992
MEdx: Design moment around the x
the critical perimeter u1.
MEdy: Design moment around the y
the critical perimeter u1.
MEdOx: Design moment around the x
of the column.
MEdOy: Design moment around the y
of the column.
u1: Critical punching shear perimeter (EN 1992
dl: Differential element of the critical perimeter length.
Ed Rd,csv v≤
Ed
Ed
1
V
v
u d
β ⋅
=
⋅
Edx 1 1
x y
Ed 1x Ed 1y
M u u
1 k k
V W V W
β = + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅
1u
1x y
0
W e dl= ⋅∫
Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -
Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-
with NA=CEN.
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
16/01/2016
Chk'd by
: Design value of the concrete compression force in the direction of the
longitudinal member axis.
Zone with punching shear reinforcement (Persistent situations)
The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1.
The following criteria must be satisfied:
: Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered.
: Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab with punching
shear reinforcement along the control section considered.
The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained
from the following expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3):
: Design value of the applied shear force.
: Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN
1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3).
: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions
(dimension in direction of the y-axis) and cx (dimension in direction of
axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1).
: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions
(dimension in direction of the x-axis) and cy (dimension in direction of
axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1).
: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity of
.
: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity of
.
: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity
: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravi
: Critical punching shear perimeter (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.2).
: Differential element of the critical perimeter length.
Edy1 1
x y
Ed 1x Ed 1y
Mu u
1 k k
V W V W
β = + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅
VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
-1-1:2004
Job Ref.
www.geodomisi.com
Sheet no./rev. 1
Date App'd by Date
Page 5 - 11
the
fcd : 16.67 MPa
The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1.
0.89 MPa ≤≤≤≤ 4.90 MPa
vEd : 0.89 MPa
: Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab with punching
vRd,cs : 4.90 MPa
The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained
vEd : 0.89 MPa
VEd : 756.75 kN
: Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN
ββββ : 1.13
: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions
(dimension in direction of
kx : 0.60
: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions
on of
ky : 0.60
axis, regarding the center of gravity of
MEdx : 58.65 kN·m
ng the center of gravity of
MEdy : 12.30 kN·m
axis, regarding the center of gravity
MEdOx : 58.65 kN·m
ty
MEdOy : 12.30 kN·m
1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.2). u1 : 4362 mm
W1x : 19163.6 cm²
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -
Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-1-1:2004
with NA=CEN.
Job Ref.
www.geodomisi.com
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Sheet no./rev. 1
Calc.
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
16/01/2016
Chk'd by
Date App'd by Date
Page 6 - 11
ey: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdx acts about.
W1y : 19163.6 cm²
ex: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdy acts about.
d: Nominal depth of the slab. d : 220 mm
The design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab with punching shear
reinforcement along the control section considered is obtained from the following
expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5):
vRd,cs : 4.90 MPa
Where:
vRd,c : 0.95 MPa
with a minimum value of:
vRd,c,min : 0.68 MPa
Where:
γγγγc: Concrete resistance reduction coefficient. γγγγc : 1.50
k: Coefficient which depends on the nominal depth of 'd'. k : 1.95
fck: Concrete compressive strength. fck : 25.00 MPa
ρρρρl: Geometric steel area of the main tensile longitudinal
reinforcement. ρρρρl : 0.0132
Where:
ρρρρlx: Ratio in X-direction. ρρρρlx : 0.0132
ρρρρly: Ratio in Y-direction. ρρρρly : 0.0132
σσσσcp: Average axial stress on the critical verification surface (positive
compression), with a maximum value of σcp,max. σσσσcp : 2.00 MPa
σσσσcp,max : 3.33 MPa
fcd: Design value of the concrete compression force in the
direction of the longitudinal member axis. fcd : 16.67 MPa
1u
1y x
0
W e dl= ⋅∫
sw
ywd,ef
r
Rd,cs Rd,c
1
A
f sin
s
v 0.75 v 1.5
u
 
⋅ ⋅ α 
 = ⋅ + ⋅
∑
( )
1 / 3
Rd,c l ck cp
c
0.18
v k 100 f 0.1= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ρ ⋅ + ⋅ σ
γ
3 / 2 1 / 2
Rd,c,min ck cpv 0.035 k f 0.1= ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ σ
200
k 1 2
d
 
= + ≤  
 
l lx ly 0.02ρ = ρ ⋅ ρ ≤
cp,max cd0.20 fσ = ⋅
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461
Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
Asw: Total area of punching shear reinforcement within a permieter
concentric with the support or loaded area.
sr: Radial distance between two concentric perimeters of rei
αααα: Angle between the shear reinforcement and the plane of the slab.
Reference
111
111
fywd,ef: Effective design strength of the punching shear
fywd: Design yield strength of the shear reinforcement.
(EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.2.3(3))
u1: Critical punching shear perimeter (EN 1992
3.- External zone to the punching shear reinforecement (Persistent situations)
The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1.
The following criteria must be satisfied:
Where:
vEd: Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered.
vRd,c: Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab without punching
shear reinforcement along the control section considered.
The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained
from the following expression (EN 1992
Where:
VEd: Design value of the applied shear force.
ββββ: Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN
1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3).
ywd,ef ywdf 250 0.25 d f= + ⋅ ≤
ywd ywkf 0.8 f= ⋅
Ed Rd,cv v≤
Ed
Ed
out,ef
V
v
u d
β ⋅
=
⋅
Edx out,ef out,ef
x y
Ed out,ef,x Ed out,ef,y
M u u
1 k k
V W V W
β = + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅
Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -
Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-
with NA=CEN.
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
16/01/2016
Chk'd by
: Total area of punching shear reinforcement within a permieter
concentric with the support or loaded area.
: Radial distance between two concentric perimeters of reinforcement.
: Angle between the shear reinforcement and the plane of the slab.
Asw
(mm²)
sr
(mm)
α
(degrees)
2262 80 45.0
2262 80 45.0
: Effective design strength of the punching shear reinforcement.
: Design yield strength of the shear reinforcement.
1:2004/AC:2008, 6.2.3(3))
perimeter (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.2).
External zone to the punching shear reinforecement (Persistent situations)
The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1.
must be satisfied:
: Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered.
: Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab without punching
nt along the control section considered.
The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained
from the following expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5):
: Design value of the applied shear force.
: Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN
1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3).
EdyEdx out,ef out,ef
x y
Ed out,ef,x Ed out,ef,y
MM u u
1 k k
V W V W
β = + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅
VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
-1-1:2004
Job Ref.
www.geodomisi.com
Sheet no./rev. 1
Date App'd by Date
Page 7 - 11
nforcement.
Asw/sr
(cm²/m)
282.8
282.8
fywd,ef : 305.00 MPa
fywd : 320.00 MPa
fywk : 400.00 MPa
u1 : 4362 mm
External zone to the punching shear reinforecement (Persistent situations)
The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1.
0.72 MPa ≤≤≤≤ 0.95 MPa
vEd : 0.72 MPa
: Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab without punching
vRd,c : 0.95 MPa
The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained
vEd : 0.72 MPa
VEd : 756.75 kN
: Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN
ββββ : 1.05
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -
Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-1-1:2004
with NA=CEN.
Job Ref.
www.geodomisi.com
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Sheet no./rev. 1
Calc.
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
16/01/2016
Chk'd by
Date App'd by Date
Page 8 - 11
kx: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions
cy (dimension in direction of the y-axis) and cx (dimension in direction of
the x-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). kx : 0.60
ky: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions
cx (dimension in direction of the x-axis) and cy (dimension in direction of
the y-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). ky : 0.60
MEdx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity of
the critical perimeter uout,ef. MEdx : 58.65 kN·m
MEdy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity of
the critical perimeter uout,ef. MEdy : 12.30 kN·m
MEdOx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity
of the column. MEdOx : 58.65 kN·m
MEdOy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity
of the column. MEdOy : 12.30 kN·m
uout,ef: Critical punching shear perimeter outside the reinforced zone (EN
1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5). uout,ef : 5031 mm
Wout,ef,x : 51487.8 cm²
dl: Differential element of the critical perimeter length.
ey: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdx acts about.
Wout,ef,y : 51487.8 cm²
ex: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdy acts about.
d: Nominal depth of the slab. d : 220 mm
The design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab without punching shear
reinformcement along the control section considered is obtained from the following
expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.4):
vRd,c : 0.95 MPa
with a minimum value of:
vRd,c,min : 0.68 MPa
Where:
γγγγc: Concrete resistance reduction coefficient. γγγγc : 1.50
k: Coefficient which depends on the nominal depth of 'd'. k : 1.95
fck: Concrete compressive strength. fck : 25.00 MPa
ρρρρl: Geometric steel area of the main tensile longitudinal reinforcement. ρρρρl : 0.0132
out,efu
out,ef,x y
0
W e dl= ⋅∫
out,efu
out,ef,y x
0
W e dl= ⋅∫
( )
1 / 3
Rd,c l ck cp
c
0.18
v k 100 f 0.1= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ρ ⋅ + ⋅ σ
γ
3 / 2 1 / 2
Rd,c,min ck cpv 0.035 k f 0.1= ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ σ
200
k 1 2
d
 
= + ≤  
 
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461
Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
Where:
ρρρρlx: Ratio in X-
ρρρρly: Ratio in Y-
σσσσcp: Average axial stress on the critical verification surface (positive
compression), with a maximum value of
fcd: Design value of the concrete compression for
the longitudinal member axis.
4.- Punching shear reinforcement (EN 1992
Where shear reinforcement is required the area of a link leg (or equivalent), A
(9.11).
Reference
Asw
(mm²)
111 113
111 113
where:
Asw: the area of a link leg (or equivalent).
αααα: is the angle between the shear reinforcement and the main steel (i.e. f
α = 90° and sin α = 1).
sr: is the spacing of shear links in the radial direction.
st: is the spacing of shear links in the tangential direction.
fck: is in MPa
5.- Clear distance between two isolated consecutive bars
The horizontal and vertical clear spacing d
smin (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 8.2(2)):
l lx ly 0.02ρ = ρ ⋅ ρ ≤
cp,max cd0.20 fσ = ⋅
( ) ( ),min 1,5 sin cos / 0,08 / 9.11sw r t ck ykA s s f fα α⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ≥ ⋅
( ) ( )
( )
,min
,min
1,5 sin cos /
0,08 /
w sw r t
w ck yk
A s s
f f
ρ α α
ρ
= ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅
= ⋅
l mind s≥
Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -
Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-
with NA=CEN.
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
16/01/2016
Chk'd by
-direction.
-direction.
: Average axial stress on the critical verification surface (positive
compression), with a maximum value of σcp,max.
: Design value of the concrete compression force in the direction of
the longitudinal member axis.
Punching shear reinforcement (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3(2))
Where shear reinforcement is required the area of a link leg (or equivalent), Asw,min
(mm²)
sr
(mm)
st
(mm)
α
(degrees)
ρw ρw,min
80 33 45.0 0.0757 0.0010
80 33 45.0 0.0757 0.0010
: the area of a link leg (or equivalent).
: is the angle between the shear reinforcement and the main steel (i.e. for vertical links
: is the spacing of shear links in the radial direction.
: is the spacing of shear links in the tangential direction.
between two isolated consecutive bars
The horizontal and vertical clear spacing dl between two consecutive bars should be greater than or equal to
1:2004/AC:2008, 8.2(2)):
0.02
( ) ( )1,5 sin cos / 0,08 / 9.11sw r t ck ykA s s f f⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ≥ ⋅
VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
-1-1:2004
Job Ref.
www.geodomisi.com
Sheet no./rev. 1
Date App'd by Date
Page 9 - 11
ρρρρlx : 0.0132
ρρρρly : 0.0132
σσσσcp : 2.00 MPa
σσσσcp,max : 3.33 MPa
ce in the direction of
fcd : 16.67 MPa
1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3(2))
sw,min, is given by Expression
w,min ρw ≥ ρw,min
0.0010
0.0010
or vertical links
fck : 25.00 MPa
between two consecutive bars should be greater than or equal to
21 mm ≥≥≥≥ 20 mm
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461
Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
Where:
smin: Maximum value of s1, s2
Where:
dg: Maximum size of aggregate.
Ømax: Diameter of the thickest bar of the transverse reinforcement.
111
111
6.- Distance between the support's face and the first punching shear reinforcement
The distance between the face of the support or loaded area and the first punching shear r
not be greater than smax (EN 1992-
Where:
d: Nominal depth of the slab.
7.- Distance between transverse consecutive reinforcemen
The distance dl between consecutive transverse reinforcement perimeters should be, at most, equal to s
1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3):
Where:
1 maxs = ∅
2 gs 5 d= +
3s 20mm=
l maxd s≤
maxs 0.5 d= ⋅
l maxd s≤
Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -
Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-
with NA=CEN.
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
16/01/2016
Chk'd by
2, s3.
: Maximum size of aggregate.
: Diameter of the thickest bar of the transverse reinforcement.
dl
(mm)
smin
(mm)
Ømax
(mm)
21 20 12
21 20 12
Distance between the support's face and the first punching shear reinforcement
The distance between the face of the support or loaded area and the first punching shear r
-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3):
: Nominal depth of the slab.
Distance between transverse consecutive reinforcement perimeters
between consecutive transverse reinforcement perimeters should be, at most, equal to s
VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
-1-1:2004
Job Ref.
www.geodomisi.com
Sheet no./rev. 1
Date App'd by Date
Page 10 - 11
smin : 20 mm
s1 : 12 mm
s2 : 17 mm
s3 : 20 mm
dg : 12 mm
Ømax : 12 mm
Distance between the support's face and the first punching shear reinforcement
The distance between the face of the support or loaded area and the first punching shear reinforcement should
80 mm ≤≤≤≤ 110 mm
smax : 110 mm
d : 220 mm
between consecutive transverse reinforcement perimeters should be, at most, equal to smax (EN
80 mm ≤≤≤≤ 165 mm
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461
Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
d: Nominal depth of the slab.
8.- Distance between two consecutive reinforcements in peripheral direction
The distance dl between two consecutive perimeter reinforcements should not be greater than s
1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3):
Where:
d: Nominal depth of the slab.
9.- Distance between the support's external face and the outermost bar inclined at 45°
This combination does not proceed since the reinforcement is locate
support.
maxs 0.75 d= ⋅
l maxd s≤
= ⋅maxs 1.5 d
Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Fax.:+30 210 5711461 -
Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-
with NA=CEN.
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
Calc.
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
16/01/2016
Chk'd by
: Nominal depth of the slab.
Distance between two consecutive reinforcements in peripheral direction
between two consecutive perimeter reinforcements should not be greater than s
: Nominal depth of the slab.
Distance between the support's external face and the outermost bar inclined at 45°
This combination does not proceed since the reinforcement is located between the external faces of the
GEODOMISI Ltd.
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation
Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263
(+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com
VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING
-1-1:2004
Job Ref.
www.geodomisi.com
Sheet no./rev. 1
Date App'd by Date
Page 11 - 11
smax : 165 mm
d : 220 mm
Distance between two consecutive reinforcements in peripheral direction
between two consecutive perimeter reinforcements should not be greater than smax (EN 1992-
33 mm ≤≤≤≤ 330 mm
smax : 330 mm
d : 220 mm
Distance between the support's external face and the outermost bar inclined at 45°
d between the external faces of the
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation
Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Mobile:
(+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944,
www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...
Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...
Sachpazis Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free E...
 
Sachpazis: Strip Foundation Analysis and Design example (EN1997-1:2004)
Sachpazis: Strip Foundation Analysis and Design example (EN1997-1:2004)Sachpazis: Strip Foundation Analysis and Design example (EN1997-1:2004)
Sachpazis: Strip Foundation Analysis and Design example (EN1997-1:2004)
 
Sachpazis steel sheet piling analysis & design, fixed earth support in ac...
Sachpazis steel sheet piling analysis & design, fixed earth support in ac...Sachpazis steel sheet piling analysis & design, fixed earth support in ac...
Sachpazis steel sheet piling analysis & design, fixed earth support in ac...
 
Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)
Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)
Sachpazis Steel Member Analysis & Design (EN1993 1-1 2005)
 
Sachpazis Cantilever Retaining Wall, In accordance to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10 ...
Sachpazis Cantilever Retaining Wall, In accordance to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10 ...Sachpazis Cantilever Retaining Wall, In accordance to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10 ...
Sachpazis Cantilever Retaining Wall, In accordance to IBC 2012 and ASCE 7-10 ...
 
Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004
Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004
Sachpazis pile analysis & design, in accordance with en 1997 1-2004
 
Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7
Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7
Sachpazis Cantilever Pile Retaining Wall Embedded, In accordance Eurocode 7
 
Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017
Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017
Sachpazis_Wind Loading (EN1991-1-4) for a Duopitch roof example_Apr-2017
 
Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...
Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...
Sachpazis reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis & design, in accordance ...
 
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis & Design example According to EN 1997-1_2004_March-2017
 
Sachpazis: Sloped rear face retaining wall example
Sachpazis: Sloped rear face retaining wall exampleSachpazis: Sloped rear face retaining wall example
Sachpazis: Sloped rear face retaining wall example
 
Sachpazis Foundation Pad with Two Columns Analysis & Design According to EC2 ...
Sachpazis Foundation Pad with Two Columns Analysis & Design According to EC2 ...Sachpazis Foundation Pad with Two Columns Analysis & Design According to EC2 ...
Sachpazis Foundation Pad with Two Columns Analysis & Design According to EC2 ...
 
Sachpazis_Trapezoid Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN...
Sachpazis_Trapezoid Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN...Sachpazis_Trapezoid Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN...
Sachpazis_Trapezoid Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN...
 
Sachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof example
Sachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof exampleSachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof example
Sachpazis: Wind loading to EN 1991 1-4- for a hipped roof example
 
Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994
Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994
Sachpazis gabion retaining wall analysis & design bs8002-1994
 
Sachpazis" Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Earth Slope Stability & Capacity
Sachpazis" Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Earth Slope Stability & CapacitySachpazis" Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Earth Slope Stability & Capacity
Sachpazis" Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Earth Slope Stability & Capacity
 
Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...
Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...
Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...
 
Sachpazis: Reinforced Concrete Beam Analysis & Design Example (EN1992-1-3)
Sachpazis: Reinforced Concrete Beam Analysis & Design Example (EN1992-1-3)Sachpazis: Reinforced Concrete Beam Analysis & Design Example (EN1992-1-3)
Sachpazis: Reinforced Concrete Beam Analysis & Design Example (EN1992-1-3)
 
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design  BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design  BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis & Design BS8110:part 1-1997_plain slab w...
 
Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008
Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008
Sachpazis_Foundation Analysis & Design. Calculation according to EN 1997-1-2008
 

Viewers also liked

1.Blogbeitrag
1.Blogbeitrag1.Blogbeitrag
1.Blogbeitrag
sommer22
 
Review 9 earth_s_history_sc
Review 9 earth_s_history_scReview 9 earth_s_history_sc
Review 9 earth_s_history_sc
Lexume1
 
MSc Dissertation - Selection & Scaling of Natural Earthquake Records for Inel...
MSc Dissertation - Selection & Scaling of Natural Earthquake Records for Inel...MSc Dissertation - Selection & Scaling of Natural Earthquake Records for Inel...
MSc Dissertation - Selection & Scaling of Natural Earthquake Records for Inel...
Konstantinos Myrtsis
 
Review 10 meteorology_sc
Review 10 meteorology_scReview 10 meteorology_sc
Review 10 meteorology_sc
Lexume1
 
생명공학백서2011 발표
생명공학백서2011 발표생명공학백서2011 발표
생명공학백서2011 발표
Park Jinyong
 
Design of reinforced flat slabs to bs 8110 (ciria 110)
Design of reinforced flat slabs to bs 8110 (ciria 110)Design of reinforced flat slabs to bs 8110 (ciria 110)
Design of reinforced flat slabs to bs 8110 (ciria 110)
bmxforu
 

Viewers also liked (16)

1.Blogbeitrag
1.Blogbeitrag1.Blogbeitrag
1.Blogbeitrag
 
Grandes informaticas
Grandes informaticasGrandes informaticas
Grandes informaticas
 
Review 9 earth_s_history_sc
Review 9 earth_s_history_scReview 9 earth_s_history_sc
Review 9 earth_s_history_sc
 
Einfach podcasten
Einfach podcastenEinfach podcasten
Einfach podcasten
 
The new office 365
The new office 365The new office 365
The new office 365
 
MSc Dissertation - Selection & Scaling of Natural Earthquake Records for Inel...
MSc Dissertation - Selection & Scaling of Natural Earthquake Records for Inel...MSc Dissertation - Selection & Scaling of Natural Earthquake Records for Inel...
MSc Dissertation - Selection & Scaling of Natural Earthquake Records for Inel...
 
Review 10 meteorology_sc
Review 10 meteorology_scReview 10 meteorology_sc
Review 10 meteorology_sc
 
Flux Chargers
Flux ChargersFlux Chargers
Flux Chargers
 
생명공학백서2011 발표
생명공학백서2011 발표생명공학백서2011 발표
생명공학백서2011 발표
 
Shear capacity of slabs and slab strips loaded close to the support
Shear capacity of slabs and slab strips loaded close to the supportShear capacity of slabs and slab strips loaded close to the support
Shear capacity of slabs and slab strips loaded close to the support
 
Undergraduate major project_-_design_of
Undergraduate major project_-_design_ofUndergraduate major project_-_design_of
Undergraduate major project_-_design_of
 
Design of reinforced flat slabs to bs 8110 (ciria 110)
Design of reinforced flat slabs to bs 8110 (ciria 110)Design of reinforced flat slabs to bs 8110 (ciria 110)
Design of reinforced flat slabs to bs 8110 (ciria 110)
 
REPORT 6 MONTH Final
REPORT 6 MONTH FinalREPORT 6 MONTH Final
REPORT 6 MONTH Final
 
Sachpazis: Geomorphological investigation of the drainage networks and calcul...
Sachpazis: Geomorphological investigation of the drainage networks and calcul...Sachpazis: Geomorphological investigation of the drainage networks and calcul...
Sachpazis: Geomorphological investigation of the drainage networks and calcul...
 
Sachpazis: Design of a surface water drain
Sachpazis: Design of a surface water drainSachpazis: Design of a surface water drain
Sachpazis: Design of a surface water drain
 
Intro to the Higher Education Advisory Council
Intro to the Higher Education Advisory CouncilIntro to the Higher Education Advisory Council
Intro to the Higher Education Advisory Council
 

Similar to Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 1-1-2004 with na cen

Advanced seismic analysis of building-م.54-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.ناجى أبو شادى
Advanced seismic analysis of building-م.54-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.ناجى أبو شادىAdvanced seismic analysis of building-م.54-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.ناجى أبو شادى
Advanced seismic analysis of building-م.54-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.ناجى أبو شادى
Egyptian Engineers Association
 

Similar to Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 1-1-2004 with na cen (14)

Geodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazis
Geodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazisGeodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazis
Geodomisi cantilever retaining_wall_analysis_sachpazis
 
Sachpazis Masonry Column with eccentric vertical Loading Analysis & Design (E...
Sachpazis Masonry Column with eccentric vertical Loading Analysis & Design (E...Sachpazis Masonry Column with eccentric vertical Loading Analysis & Design (E...
Sachpazis Masonry Column with eccentric vertical Loading Analysis & Design (E...
 
Sachpazis: 4 rc piles cap design with eccentricity example (bs8110 part1-1997)
Sachpazis: 4 rc piles cap design with eccentricity example (bs8110 part1-1997)Sachpazis: 4 rc piles cap design with eccentricity example (bs8110 part1-1997)
Sachpazis: 4 rc piles cap design with eccentricity example (bs8110 part1-1997)
 
Single pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.Sachpazis
Single pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.SachpazisSingle pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.Sachpazis
Single pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.Sachpazis
 
Sachpazis Pad Footing Analysis & Design (EN1997-1-2004)
Sachpazis Pad Footing Analysis & Design (EN1997-1-2004)Sachpazis Pad Footing Analysis & Design (EN1997-1-2004)
Sachpazis Pad Footing Analysis & Design (EN1997-1-2004)
 
Sachpazis: Masonry wall panel design example (EN1996 1-1-2005)
Sachpazis: Masonry wall panel design example (EN1996 1-1-2005)Sachpazis: Masonry wall panel design example (EN1996 1-1-2005)
Sachpazis: Masonry wall panel design example (EN1996 1-1-2005)
 
Design of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel System
Design of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel SystemDesign of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel System
Design of Horse-Shoe Shaped Cross Passage for a Twin Tunnel System
 
Sachpazis_Pocket reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis exampleEN1997-1-2004
Sachpazis_Pocket reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis exampleEN1997-1-2004Sachpazis_Pocket reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis exampleEN1997-1-2004
Sachpazis_Pocket reinforced masonry retaining wall analysis exampleEN1997-1-2004
 
Sachpazis cantilever retaining wall analysis & design (en1997-1-2004)
Sachpazis cantilever retaining wall analysis & design (en1997-1-2004)Sachpazis cantilever retaining wall analysis & design (en1997-1-2004)
Sachpazis cantilever retaining wall analysis & design (en1997-1-2004)
 
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...
 
E0344042054
E0344042054E0344042054
E0344042054
 
Concrete shear wall design
Concrete shear wall designConcrete shear wall design
Concrete shear wall design
 
Advanced seismic analysis of building-م.54-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.ناجى أبو شادى
Advanced seismic analysis of building-م.54-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.ناجى أبو شادىAdvanced seismic analysis of building-م.54-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.ناجى أبو شادى
Advanced seismic analysis of building-م.54-مبادرة#تواصل_تطوير-أ.د.ناجى أبو شادى
 
Sachpazis: Steel member design in biaxial bending and axial compression examp...
Sachpazis: Steel member design in biaxial bending and axial compression examp...Sachpazis: Steel member design in biaxial bending and axial compression examp...
Sachpazis: Steel member design in biaxial bending and axial compression examp...
 

More from Dr.Costas Sachpazis

Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundations
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundationsPile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundations
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundations
Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής ΕνέργειαςΣαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 

More from Dr.Costas Sachpazis (20)

Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
 
Seismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Seismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas SachpazisSeismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Seismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas Sachpazis
 
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
 
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
 
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionSachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective Introduction
 
Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...
Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...
Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...
 
Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...
Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...
Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...
 
Chapter9Lec16Jan03.ppt
Chapter9Lec16Jan03.pptChapter9Lec16Jan03.ppt
Chapter9Lec16Jan03.ppt
 
ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.ppt
ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.pptΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.ppt
ΓΕΩΛΟΓΙΚΟΙ ΧΑΡΤΕΣ IntroToMaps_v2_PART1.ppt
 
MBA-EMarketing-Lecture.pptx
MBA-EMarketing-Lecture.pptxMBA-EMarketing-Lecture.pptx
MBA-EMarketing-Lecture.pptx
 
Marketing.ppt
Marketing.pptMarketing.ppt
Marketing.ppt
 
Sachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκας
Sachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκαςSachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκας
Sachpazis σαχπάζης φορέας αμφιέρειστης πλάκας
 
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundations
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundationsPile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundations
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundations
 
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής ΕνέργειαςΣαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
 
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...
 
Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021
Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021
Sachpazis truss analysis and design example_28-02-2021
 
Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654
Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654
Sachpazis what is differential settlement 4654
 
Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_
Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_
Sachpazis: Retaining Walls - Know How Basics_
 
Sachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About Dams
Sachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About DamsSachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About Dams
Sachpazis: Hydraulic Structures / About Dams
 
Sachpazis: Slope Stability Analysis
Sachpazis: Slope Stability AnalysisSachpazis: Slope Stability Analysis
Sachpazis: Slope Stability Analysis
 

Recently uploaded

Fruit shop management system project report.pdf
Fruit shop management system project report.pdfFruit shop management system project report.pdf
Fruit shop management system project report.pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
LIGA(E)11111111111111111111111111111111111111111.ppt
LIGA(E)11111111111111111111111111111111111111111.pptLIGA(E)11111111111111111111111111111111111111111.ppt
LIGA(E)11111111111111111111111111111111111111111.ppt
ssuser9bd3ba
 
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptxpower quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
ViniHema
 
Standard Reomte Control Interface - Neometrix
Standard Reomte Control Interface - NeometrixStandard Reomte Control Interface - Neometrix
Standard Reomte Control Interface - Neometrix
Neometrix_Engineering_Pvt_Ltd
 
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxCFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
R&R Consult
 
RS Khurmi Machine Design Clutch and Brake Exercise Numerical Solutions
RS Khurmi Machine Design Clutch and Brake Exercise Numerical SolutionsRS Khurmi Machine Design Clutch and Brake Exercise Numerical Solutions
RS Khurmi Machine Design Clutch and Brake Exercise Numerical Solutions
Atif Razi
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Fruit shop management system project report.pdf
Fruit shop management system project report.pdfFruit shop management system project report.pdf
Fruit shop management system project report.pdf
 
Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Arya
Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek AryaDemocratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Arya
Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Arya
 
Courier management system project report.pdf
Courier management system project report.pdfCourier management system project report.pdf
Courier management system project report.pdf
 
LIGA(E)11111111111111111111111111111111111111111.ppt
LIGA(E)11111111111111111111111111111111111111111.pptLIGA(E)11111111111111111111111111111111111111111.ppt
LIGA(E)11111111111111111111111111111111111111111.ppt
 
Cloud-Computing_CSE311_Computer-Networking CSE GUB BD - Shahidul.pptx
Cloud-Computing_CSE311_Computer-Networking CSE GUB BD - Shahidul.pptxCloud-Computing_CSE311_Computer-Networking CSE GUB BD - Shahidul.pptx
Cloud-Computing_CSE311_Computer-Networking CSE GUB BD - Shahidul.pptx
 
Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-5 Notes for II-II Mechanical Engineering
Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-5 Notes for II-II Mechanical EngineeringIntroduction to Machine Learning Unit-5 Notes for II-II Mechanical Engineering
Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-5 Notes for II-II Mechanical Engineering
 
Architectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
Architectural Portfolio Sean LockwoodArchitectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
Architectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
 
A case study of cinema management system project report..pdf
A case study of cinema management system project report..pdfA case study of cinema management system project report..pdf
A case study of cinema management system project report..pdf
 
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptxpower quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
 
Water Industry Process Automation and Control Monthly - May 2024.pdf
Water Industry Process Automation and Control Monthly - May 2024.pdfWater Industry Process Automation and Control Monthly - May 2024.pdf
Water Industry Process Automation and Control Monthly - May 2024.pdf
 
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdfFinal project report on grocery store management system..pdf
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdf
 
Danfoss NeoCharge Technology -A Revolution in 2024.pdf
Danfoss NeoCharge Technology -A Revolution in 2024.pdfDanfoss NeoCharge Technology -A Revolution in 2024.pdf
Danfoss NeoCharge Technology -A Revolution in 2024.pdf
 
Event Management System Vb Net Project Report.pdf
Event Management System Vb Net  Project Report.pdfEvent Management System Vb Net  Project Report.pdf
Event Management System Vb Net Project Report.pdf
 
Online resume builder management system project report.pdf
Online resume builder management system project report.pdfOnline resume builder management system project report.pdf
Online resume builder management system project report.pdf
 
Standard Reomte Control Interface - Neometrix
Standard Reomte Control Interface - NeometrixStandard Reomte Control Interface - Neometrix
Standard Reomte Control Interface - Neometrix
 
A CASE STUDY ON ONLINE TICKET BOOKING SYSTEM PROJECT.pdf
A CASE STUDY ON ONLINE TICKET BOOKING SYSTEM PROJECT.pdfA CASE STUDY ON ONLINE TICKET BOOKING SYSTEM PROJECT.pdf
A CASE STUDY ON ONLINE TICKET BOOKING SYSTEM PROJECT.pdf
 
Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-4 Notes for II-II Mechanical Engineering
Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-4 Notes for II-II Mechanical EngineeringIntroduction to Machine Learning Unit-4 Notes for II-II Mechanical Engineering
Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-4 Notes for II-II Mechanical Engineering
 
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxCFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
 
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
 
RS Khurmi Machine Design Clutch and Brake Exercise Numerical Solutions
RS Khurmi Machine Design Clutch and Brake Exercise Numerical SolutionsRS Khurmi Machine Design Clutch and Brake Exercise Numerical Solutions
RS Khurmi Machine Design Clutch and Brake Exercise Numerical Solutions
 

Sachpazis verification of the ultimate punching shear resistance to ec2 1992 1-1-2004 with na cen

  • 1. VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE EUROCODE 2 GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info
  • 2. GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-1-1:2004 with NA=CEN. Job Ref. www.geodomisi.com Section Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Sheet no./rev. 1 Calc. Dr. C. Sachpazis Date 16/01/2016 Chk'd by Date App'd by Date INDEX DESCRIPTION CHECKS 1.- Zone adjacent to the support or load (Persistent situations) 3 2.- Zone with punching shear reinforcement (Persistent situations) 5 3.- External zone to the punching shear reinforecement (Persistent situations) 7 4.- Punching shear reinforcement (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3(2)) 9 5.- Clear distance between two isolated consecutive bars 9 6.- Distance between the support's face and the first punching shear reinforcement 10 7.- Distance between transverse consecutive reinforcement perimeters 10 8.- Distance between two consecutive reinforcements in peripheral direction 11 9.- Distance between the support's external face and the outermost bar inclined at 45° 11
  • 3. GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info DESCRIPTION Calculation of the punching shear perimeters CHECKS 1.- Zone adjacent to the support or load (Persistent situations) The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1. The following criteria must be satisfied: Where: vEd: Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered. vRd,max: Design value of the maximum punching shear resistance along the control section considered. The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained from the following expression (EN 1992 Where: VEd: Design value of the applied shear force. Ed Rd,maxv v≤ Ed Ed 0 V v u d β ⋅ = ⋅ Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992- with NA=CEN. Section Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Calc. Dr. C. Sachpazis Date 16/01/2016 Chk'd by Calculation of the punching shear perimeters Perimeter of the s u0: Critical perimeter u1: xG: yG: W1x: W1y: Punching shear reinforcement perimeter uout,ef: xG: yG: Wout,ef,x: Wout,ef,y: Zone adjacent to the support or load (Persistent situations) The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1. The following criteria must be satisfied: : Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered. : Design value of the maximum punching shear resistance along the of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained from the following expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5): : Design value of the applied shear force. VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING -1-1:2004 Job Ref. www.geodomisi.com Sheet no./rev. 1 Date App'd by Date Page 3 - 11 Perimeter of the support (C1) 1600 mm Critical perimeter 4362 mm 0 mm 0 mm 19163.6 cm² 19163.6 cm² Punching shear reinforcement perimeter 5031 mm 0 mm 0 mm 51487.8 cm² 51487.8 cm² The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1. 2.43 MPa ≤≤≤≤ 4.50 MPa vEd : 2.43 MPa vRd,max : 4.50 MPa of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained vEd : 2.43 MPa VEd : 756.75 kN
  • 4. GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-1-1:2004 with NA=CEN. Job Ref. www.geodomisi.com Section Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Sheet no./rev. 1 Calc. Dr. C. Sachpazis Date 16/01/2016 Chk'd by Date App'd by Date Page 4 - 11 ββββ: Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3). ββββ : 1.13 kx: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions cy (dimension in direction of the y-axis) and cx (dimension in direction of the x-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). kx : 0.60 ky: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions cx (dimension in direction of the x-axis) and cy (dimension in direction of the y-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). ky : 0.60 MEdx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity of the critical perimeter u1. MEdx : 58.65 kN·m MEdy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity of the critical perimeter u1. MEdy : 12.30 kN·m MEdOx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity of the column. MEdOx : 58.65 kN·m MEdOy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity of the column. MEdOy : 12.30 kN·m u1: Critical punching shear perimeter (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.2). u1 : 4362 mm W1x : 19163.6 cm² dl: Differential element of the critical perimeter length. ey: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdx acts about. W1y : 19163.6 cm² ex: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdy acts about. u0: Verification critical punching shear perimeter of the area adjacent to the support or load (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5). u0 : 1600 mm d: Nominal depth of the slab. d : 220 mm The design value of the maximum punching shear resistance along the control section considered is obtained from the following expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5): vRd,max : 4.50 MPa νννν : 0.54 Where: fck: Concrete compressive strength. fck : 25.00 MPa EdyEdx 1 1 x y Ed 1x Ed 1y MM u u 1 k k V W V W β = + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ 1u 1x y 0 W e dl= ⋅∫ 1u 1y x 0 W e dl= ⋅∫ Rd,max cdv 0.5 f= ⋅ ν ⋅ ckf 0.6 1 250   ν = ⋅ −   
  • 5. GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info fcd: Design value of the concrete compression force in the direction of longitudinal member axis. 2.- Zone with punching shear reinforcement (Persistent situations) The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1. The following criteria must be satisfied: Where: vEd: Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered. vRd,cs: Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab with punching shear reinforcement along the control section cons The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained from the following expression (EN 1992 Where: VEd: Design value of the applied shear force. ββββ: Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3). kx: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions cy (dimension in direction of the y the x-axis) of the column (EN 1992 ky: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions cx (dimension in direction of the x the y-axis) of the column (EN 1992 MEdx: Design moment around the x the critical perimeter u1. MEdy: Design moment around the y the critical perimeter u1. MEdOx: Design moment around the x of the column. MEdOy: Design moment around the y of the column. u1: Critical punching shear perimeter (EN 1992 dl: Differential element of the critical perimeter length. Ed Rd,csv v≤ Ed Ed 1 V v u d β ⋅ = ⋅ Edx 1 1 x y Ed 1x Ed 1y M u u 1 k k V W V W β = + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ 1u 1x y 0 W e dl= ⋅∫ Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992- with NA=CEN. Section Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Calc. Dr. C. Sachpazis Date 16/01/2016 Chk'd by : Design value of the concrete compression force in the direction of the longitudinal member axis. Zone with punching shear reinforcement (Persistent situations) The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1. The following criteria must be satisfied: : Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered. : Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab with punching shear reinforcement along the control section considered. The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained from the following expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3): : Design value of the applied shear force. : Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN 1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3). : Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions (dimension in direction of the y-axis) and cx (dimension in direction of axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). : Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions (dimension in direction of the x-axis) and cy (dimension in direction of axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). : Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity of . : Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity of . : Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity : Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravi : Critical punching shear perimeter (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.2). : Differential element of the critical perimeter length. Edy1 1 x y Ed 1x Ed 1y Mu u 1 k k V W V W β = + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING -1-1:2004 Job Ref. www.geodomisi.com Sheet no./rev. 1 Date App'd by Date Page 5 - 11 the fcd : 16.67 MPa The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1. 0.89 MPa ≤≤≤≤ 4.90 MPa vEd : 0.89 MPa : Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab with punching vRd,cs : 4.90 MPa The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained vEd : 0.89 MPa VEd : 756.75 kN : Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN ββββ : 1.13 : Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions (dimension in direction of kx : 0.60 : Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions on of ky : 0.60 axis, regarding the center of gravity of MEdx : 58.65 kN·m ng the center of gravity of MEdy : 12.30 kN·m axis, regarding the center of gravity MEdOx : 58.65 kN·m ty MEdOy : 12.30 kN·m 1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.2). u1 : 4362 mm W1x : 19163.6 cm²
  • 6. GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-1-1:2004 with NA=CEN. Job Ref. www.geodomisi.com Section Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Sheet no./rev. 1 Calc. Dr. C. Sachpazis Date 16/01/2016 Chk'd by Date App'd by Date Page 6 - 11 ey: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdx acts about. W1y : 19163.6 cm² ex: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdy acts about. d: Nominal depth of the slab. d : 220 mm The design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab with punching shear reinforcement along the control section considered is obtained from the following expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5): vRd,cs : 4.90 MPa Where: vRd,c : 0.95 MPa with a minimum value of: vRd,c,min : 0.68 MPa Where: γγγγc: Concrete resistance reduction coefficient. γγγγc : 1.50 k: Coefficient which depends on the nominal depth of 'd'. k : 1.95 fck: Concrete compressive strength. fck : 25.00 MPa ρρρρl: Geometric steel area of the main tensile longitudinal reinforcement. ρρρρl : 0.0132 Where: ρρρρlx: Ratio in X-direction. ρρρρlx : 0.0132 ρρρρly: Ratio in Y-direction. ρρρρly : 0.0132 σσσσcp: Average axial stress on the critical verification surface (positive compression), with a maximum value of σcp,max. σσσσcp : 2.00 MPa σσσσcp,max : 3.33 MPa fcd: Design value of the concrete compression force in the direction of the longitudinal member axis. fcd : 16.67 MPa 1u 1y x 0 W e dl= ⋅∫ sw ywd,ef r Rd,cs Rd,c 1 A f sin s v 0.75 v 1.5 u   ⋅ ⋅ α   = ⋅ + ⋅ ∑ ( ) 1 / 3 Rd,c l ck cp c 0.18 v k 100 f 0.1= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ρ ⋅ + ⋅ σ γ 3 / 2 1 / 2 Rd,c,min ck cpv 0.035 k f 0.1= ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ σ 200 k 1 2 d   = + ≤     l lx ly 0.02ρ = ρ ⋅ ρ ≤ cp,max cd0.20 fσ = ⋅
  • 7. GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info Asw: Total area of punching shear reinforcement within a permieter concentric with the support or loaded area. sr: Radial distance between two concentric perimeters of rei αααα: Angle between the shear reinforcement and the plane of the slab. Reference 111 111 fywd,ef: Effective design strength of the punching shear fywd: Design yield strength of the shear reinforcement. (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.2.3(3)) u1: Critical punching shear perimeter (EN 1992 3.- External zone to the punching shear reinforecement (Persistent situations) The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1. The following criteria must be satisfied: Where: vEd: Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered. vRd,c: Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab without punching shear reinforcement along the control section considered. The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained from the following expression (EN 1992 Where: VEd: Design value of the applied shear force. ββββ: Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3). ywd,ef ywdf 250 0.25 d f= + ⋅ ≤ ywd ywkf 0.8 f= ⋅ Ed Rd,cv v≤ Ed Ed out,ef V v u d β ⋅ = ⋅ Edx out,ef out,ef x y Ed out,ef,x Ed out,ef,y M u u 1 k k V W V W β = + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992- with NA=CEN. Section Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Calc. Dr. C. Sachpazis Date 16/01/2016 Chk'd by : Total area of punching shear reinforcement within a permieter concentric with the support or loaded area. : Radial distance between two concentric perimeters of reinforcement. : Angle between the shear reinforcement and the plane of the slab. Asw (mm²) sr (mm) α (degrees) 2262 80 45.0 2262 80 45.0 : Effective design strength of the punching shear reinforcement. : Design yield strength of the shear reinforcement. 1:2004/AC:2008, 6.2.3(3)) perimeter (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.2). External zone to the punching shear reinforecement (Persistent situations) The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1. must be satisfied: : Design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered. : Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab without punching nt along the control section considered. The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained from the following expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5): : Design value of the applied shear force. : Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN 1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.3). EdyEdx out,ef out,ef x y Ed out,ef,x Ed out,ef,y MM u u 1 k k V W V W β = + ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING -1-1:2004 Job Ref. www.geodomisi.com Sheet no./rev. 1 Date App'd by Date Page 7 - 11 nforcement. Asw/sr (cm²/m) 282.8 282.8 fywd,ef : 305.00 MPa fywd : 320.00 MPa fywk : 400.00 MPa u1 : 4362 mm External zone to the punching shear reinforecement (Persistent situations) The worst case design forces occur for load combination 1.35·SW+1.35·DL1+1.5·LL1. 0.72 MPa ≤≤≤≤ 0.95 MPa vEd : 0.72 MPa : Design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab without punching vRd,c : 0.95 MPa The design value of the sheer stress along the control section considered is obtained vEd : 0.72 MPa VEd : 756.75 kN : Coefficient which takes into account the effects of load eccentricity. (EN ββββ : 1.05
  • 8. GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992-1-1:2004 with NA=CEN. Job Ref. www.geodomisi.com Section Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Sheet no./rev. 1 Calc. Dr. C. Sachpazis Date 16/01/2016 Chk'd by Date App'd by Date Page 8 - 11 kx: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions cy (dimension in direction of the y-axis) and cx (dimension in direction of the x-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). kx : 0.60 ky: Coefficient which depends on the relationship between the dimensions cx (dimension in direction of the x-axis) and cy (dimension in direction of the y-axis) of the column (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, Table 6.1). ky : 0.60 MEdx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity of the critical perimeter uout,ef. MEdx : 58.65 kN·m MEdy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity of the critical perimeter uout,ef. MEdy : 12.30 kN·m MEdOx: Design moment around the x-axis, regarding the center of gravity of the column. MEdOx : 58.65 kN·m MEdOy: Design moment around the y-axis, regarding the center of gravity of the column. MEdOy : 12.30 kN·m uout,ef: Critical punching shear perimeter outside the reinforced zone (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.5). uout,ef : 5031 mm Wout,ef,x : 51487.8 cm² dl: Differential element of the critical perimeter length. ey: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdx acts about. Wout,ef,y : 51487.8 cm² ex: Distance from dl to the axis where the moment MEdy acts about. d: Nominal depth of the slab. d : 220 mm The design value of the punching shear resistance of a slab without punching shear reinformcement along the control section considered is obtained from the following expression (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 6.4.4): vRd,c : 0.95 MPa with a minimum value of: vRd,c,min : 0.68 MPa Where: γγγγc: Concrete resistance reduction coefficient. γγγγc : 1.50 k: Coefficient which depends on the nominal depth of 'd'. k : 1.95 fck: Concrete compressive strength. fck : 25.00 MPa ρρρρl: Geometric steel area of the main tensile longitudinal reinforcement. ρρρρl : 0.0132 out,efu out,ef,x y 0 W e dl= ⋅∫ out,efu out,ef,y x 0 W e dl= ⋅∫ ( ) 1 / 3 Rd,c l ck cp c 0.18 v k 100 f 0.1= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ρ ⋅ + ⋅ σ γ 3 / 2 1 / 2 Rd,c,min ck cpv 0.035 k f 0.1= ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ σ 200 k 1 2 d   = + ≤    
  • 9. GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info Where: ρρρρlx: Ratio in X- ρρρρly: Ratio in Y- σσσσcp: Average axial stress on the critical verification surface (positive compression), with a maximum value of fcd: Design value of the concrete compression for the longitudinal member axis. 4.- Punching shear reinforcement (EN 1992 Where shear reinforcement is required the area of a link leg (or equivalent), A (9.11). Reference Asw (mm²) 111 113 111 113 where: Asw: the area of a link leg (or equivalent). αααα: is the angle between the shear reinforcement and the main steel (i.e. f α = 90° and sin α = 1). sr: is the spacing of shear links in the radial direction. st: is the spacing of shear links in the tangential direction. fck: is in MPa 5.- Clear distance between two isolated consecutive bars The horizontal and vertical clear spacing d smin (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 8.2(2)): l lx ly 0.02ρ = ρ ⋅ ρ ≤ cp,max cd0.20 fσ = ⋅ ( ) ( ),min 1,5 sin cos / 0,08 / 9.11sw r t ck ykA s s f fα α⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ≥ ⋅ ( ) ( ) ( ) ,min ,min 1,5 sin cos / 0,08 / w sw r t w ck yk A s s f f ρ α α ρ = ⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ = ⋅ l mind s≥ Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992- with NA=CEN. Section Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Calc. Dr. C. Sachpazis Date 16/01/2016 Chk'd by -direction. -direction. : Average axial stress on the critical verification surface (positive compression), with a maximum value of σcp,max. : Design value of the concrete compression force in the direction of the longitudinal member axis. Punching shear reinforcement (EN 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3(2)) Where shear reinforcement is required the area of a link leg (or equivalent), Asw,min (mm²) sr (mm) st (mm) α (degrees) ρw ρw,min 80 33 45.0 0.0757 0.0010 80 33 45.0 0.0757 0.0010 : the area of a link leg (or equivalent). : is the angle between the shear reinforcement and the main steel (i.e. for vertical links : is the spacing of shear links in the radial direction. : is the spacing of shear links in the tangential direction. between two isolated consecutive bars The horizontal and vertical clear spacing dl between two consecutive bars should be greater than or equal to 1:2004/AC:2008, 8.2(2)): 0.02 ( ) ( )1,5 sin cos / 0,08 / 9.11sw r t ck ykA s s f f⋅ ⋅ + ⋅ ≥ ⋅ VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING -1-1:2004 Job Ref. www.geodomisi.com Sheet no./rev. 1 Date App'd by Date Page 9 - 11 ρρρρlx : 0.0132 ρρρρly : 0.0132 σσσσcp : 2.00 MPa σσσσcp,max : 3.33 MPa ce in the direction of fcd : 16.67 MPa 1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3(2)) sw,min, is given by Expression w,min ρw ≥ ρw,min 0.0010 0.0010 or vertical links fck : 25.00 MPa between two consecutive bars should be greater than or equal to 21 mm ≥≥≥≥ 20 mm
  • 10. GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info Where: smin: Maximum value of s1, s2 Where: dg: Maximum size of aggregate. Ømax: Diameter of the thickest bar of the transverse reinforcement. 111 111 6.- Distance between the support's face and the first punching shear reinforcement The distance between the face of the support or loaded area and the first punching shear r not be greater than smax (EN 1992- Where: d: Nominal depth of the slab. 7.- Distance between transverse consecutive reinforcemen The distance dl between consecutive transverse reinforcement perimeters should be, at most, equal to s 1992-1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3): Where: 1 maxs = ∅ 2 gs 5 d= + 3s 20mm= l maxd s≤ maxs 0.5 d= ⋅ l maxd s≤ Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992- with NA=CEN. Section Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Calc. Dr. C. Sachpazis Date 16/01/2016 Chk'd by 2, s3. : Maximum size of aggregate. : Diameter of the thickest bar of the transverse reinforcement. dl (mm) smin (mm) Ømax (mm) 21 20 12 21 20 12 Distance between the support's face and the first punching shear reinforcement The distance between the face of the support or loaded area and the first punching shear r -1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3): : Nominal depth of the slab. Distance between transverse consecutive reinforcement perimeters between consecutive transverse reinforcement perimeters should be, at most, equal to s VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING -1-1:2004 Job Ref. www.geodomisi.com Sheet no./rev. 1 Date App'd by Date Page 10 - 11 smin : 20 mm s1 : 12 mm s2 : 17 mm s3 : 20 mm dg : 12 mm Ømax : 12 mm Distance between the support's face and the first punching shear reinforcement The distance between the face of the support or loaded area and the first punching shear reinforcement should 80 mm ≤≤≤≤ 110 mm smax : 110 mm d : 220 mm between consecutive transverse reinforcement perimeters should be, at most, equal to smax (EN 80 mm ≤≤≤≤ 165 mm
  • 11. GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info d: Nominal depth of the slab. 8.- Distance between two consecutive reinforcements in peripheral direction The distance dl between two consecutive perimeter reinforcements should not be greater than s 1-1:2004/AC:2008, 9.4.3): Where: d: Nominal depth of the slab. 9.- Distance between the support's external face and the outermost bar inclined at 45° This combination does not proceed since the reinforcement is locate support. maxs 0.75 d= ⋅ l maxd s≤ = ⋅maxs 1.5 d Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Project: VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING SHEAR RESISTANCE to EUROCODE2 1992- with NA=CEN. Section Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Calc. Dr. C. Sachpazis Date 16/01/2016 Chk'd by : Nominal depth of the slab. Distance between two consecutive reinforcements in peripheral direction between two consecutive perimeter reinforcements should not be greater than s : Nominal depth of the slab. Distance between the support's external face and the outermost bar inclined at 45° This combination does not proceed since the reinforcement is located between the external faces of the GEODOMISI Ltd. Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com VERIFICATION OF THE ULTIMATE PUNCHING -1-1:2004 Job Ref. www.geodomisi.com Sheet no./rev. 1 Date App'd by Date Page 11 - 11 smax : 165 mm d : 220 mm Distance between two consecutive reinforcements in peripheral direction between two consecutive perimeter reinforcements should not be greater than smax (EN 1992- 33 mm ≤≤≤≤ 330 mm smax : 330 mm d : 220 mm Distance between the support's external face and the outermost bar inclined at 45° d between the external faces of the GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics, Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures. Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 - Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, www.geodomisi.com - costas@sachpazis.info