Rice value chain development 2005–2011:
    IPMS experiences in Fogera Pilot Learning
                     Woredas




          Dirk Hoekstra, IPMS Project Manager
CIDA Stakeholder Workshop, ILRI, Addis Ababa, 2 May 2012
Main actors/partners involved

 Fogera rice farmers
 Rice traders/processors
 Office of Agriculture of Fogera (various
  departments)
 Adet Agricultural Research Centre
 SG 2000
 IPMS
Value chain process followed

 Rapid assessment on Fogera farming systems
      Lowland flood rice system
      Upland system
 Identification of potential marketable commodities
      Vegetables, rice, chickpeas, niger seed, pepper
      Dairy, beef, fish
 Rapid assessment commodity value chain
      Production, input supply, processing marketing
      Support services
 Identification of potential value chain
  interventions by commodity
Farming systems in Fogera, 2005
Methodology/tools used

 Review secondary data/GIS maps

 Field visits

 Focus group discussions with producers

 Interviews with key value chain actors
  (producers, input suppliers, processors and
  traders) and support services
  (extension, research)

 Stakeholder meeting to review and verify results
Main diagnosed findings of the rice
 commodity
 In flood system
    About 5,500 ha grown under flood conditions during
      the rainy season
    Reduced yield due to weed problems
    Farmer to farmer seed supply system exists
    Rice processed into flour (enjera making) and white
      rice (outside the district)
    Breakage of rice during processing
 In upland system
    Desire to include rice as their marketable commodity
      in the cropping pattern
Interventions

 Knowledge management and capacity development
  for rice value chain development
 Flood plain system
      Improved agronomic practices – especially weeding
       (hand and herbicide)
      Harvesting time – effecting breakage
      Rice processing – sieves, parboiling, dish preparations
 Upland system
    Introduce new varieties
    Introduce seed multiplication
Knowledge management & capacity
development
• EAP – web based source of
  information (www.eap.gov.et)
• Woreda knowledge centers- to
  increase access and sharing of
  knowledge
• Use of MSc students to increase
  knowledge generation
• Training followed by field days
  with partner institutions
• Creation of platforms of value
  chain actors to share
  knowledge
Upland seed multiplication

 Testing upland
  varieties in 2006

 Followed by on farm
  multiplication

 Development of seed
  supply system
Yield data and variety testing, 2006


No.     Variety           Yield (Q/ha)
1       NERICA – 4        10 – 52
2       NERICA– 3         6 – 28
3       Superica – 1      28




    Note: X-Jigna (upland) 40 qt
Nerica Seed Production

                   1800
                   1600
                   1400
Production in qt




                   1200
                   1000
                   800                                              Seed Production
                   600
                   400
                   200
                     0
                          2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011
                                           Year
Sale of seed in 2011 (in qt)

             Sold, 104




                          Farmer to
                         Farmer, 1540
Rice weed control

The project tested Roundup with 25
  farmers

Was found cost effective by farmers
 (environment)

Now, more emphasis on manual
  weeding which has positive effect
  on employment


                                  Farmers demonstrating on application of round up
Rice straw used for livestock feed
Rice straw treatment with urea for
livestock feed
Rice processors

 2006 – 09 processors –
  mostly in town




 2011- over 120 in town
  and 30 in rural areas
Progress against baseline

                  Baseline 2004/05             2011 achievement
                  X-Jigna (ha) NERICA-4 (ha)   X-Jigna (ha)   NERICA-4 (ha)
   Agro-ecology    Lowland       Upland         Lowland         Upland
Upland kebele
≥ 1900masl             -            0                 6,058      48.605
Lowland Kebele
‹ 1900masl          5,409           0                 9,435      6.185
     Total          5,409           0               15,493       54.79
White rice retail price/kg from 2005 – 2011 during peak supply
                                        and short supply
           12

           10

           8
Price/Kg




           6                                                       Peak supply (Feb. –
                                                                   Apr.)
           4                                                       Short supply (Aug. –
                                                                   Nov.)

           2

           0
                2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
                                   Year
Future market of rice and by-products

 Rice flour produced for rural markets
    Relatively low quality processing
    Processing partly based on fee, partly on paddy sale
    X-Jigna suitable variety

 White rice produced for urban market
   Higher quality processing
   Processing mostly based on purchase of paddy rice
   Processing results in commercial by products for
    livestock feed (bran)
Current price


 Items             Unit   Unit price
 Paddy Rice        Ton                 8,500
 White rice        Ton        11,400 -12,500
 Rice bran +husk   Ton                 1,200
NERICA-4 – white rice variety
Maize, finger millet, and rice mixture for
making flour for Enjera
Rice grain loading for Addis market
Rice Bran and Rice husk (chaff) loading
for Addis market
Relevant lessons for value chain
supporters
 Value chain development requires attention to
  different parts of the value chain in and over time
 Involvement of private sector in marketing and
  processing will often take place spontaneously
 Private sector can be supported with new knowledge
  on market opportunities and processing
  requirements
 Continuous engagement is needed – post harvest
  management, processing
Rice case study on the IPMS website
Good luck in your value chain
    development work

Rice value chain development 2005-2011: IPMS experiences in Fogera pilot learning woreds

  • 1.
    Rice value chaindevelopment 2005–2011: IPMS experiences in Fogera Pilot Learning Woredas Dirk Hoekstra, IPMS Project Manager CIDA Stakeholder Workshop, ILRI, Addis Ababa, 2 May 2012
  • 2.
    Main actors/partners involved Fogera rice farmers  Rice traders/processors  Office of Agriculture of Fogera (various departments)  Adet Agricultural Research Centre  SG 2000  IPMS
  • 3.
    Value chain processfollowed  Rapid assessment on Fogera farming systems  Lowland flood rice system  Upland system  Identification of potential marketable commodities  Vegetables, rice, chickpeas, niger seed, pepper  Dairy, beef, fish  Rapid assessment commodity value chain  Production, input supply, processing marketing  Support services  Identification of potential value chain interventions by commodity
  • 4.
    Farming systems inFogera, 2005
  • 5.
    Methodology/tools used  Reviewsecondary data/GIS maps  Field visits  Focus group discussions with producers  Interviews with key value chain actors (producers, input suppliers, processors and traders) and support services (extension, research)  Stakeholder meeting to review and verify results
  • 6.
    Main diagnosed findingsof the rice commodity  In flood system  About 5,500 ha grown under flood conditions during the rainy season  Reduced yield due to weed problems  Farmer to farmer seed supply system exists  Rice processed into flour (enjera making) and white rice (outside the district)  Breakage of rice during processing  In upland system  Desire to include rice as their marketable commodity in the cropping pattern
  • 7.
    Interventions  Knowledge managementand capacity development for rice value chain development  Flood plain system  Improved agronomic practices – especially weeding (hand and herbicide)  Harvesting time – effecting breakage  Rice processing – sieves, parboiling, dish preparations  Upland system  Introduce new varieties  Introduce seed multiplication
  • 8.
    Knowledge management &capacity development • EAP – web based source of information (www.eap.gov.et) • Woreda knowledge centers- to increase access and sharing of knowledge • Use of MSc students to increase knowledge generation • Training followed by field days with partner institutions • Creation of platforms of value chain actors to share knowledge
  • 9.
    Upland seed multiplication Testing upland varieties in 2006  Followed by on farm multiplication  Development of seed supply system
  • 10.
    Yield data andvariety testing, 2006 No. Variety Yield (Q/ha) 1 NERICA – 4 10 – 52 2 NERICA– 3 6 – 28 3 Superica – 1 28 Note: X-Jigna (upland) 40 qt
  • 11.
    Nerica Seed Production 1800 1600 1400 Production in qt 1200 1000 800 Seed Production 600 400 200 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year
  • 12.
    Sale of seedin 2011 (in qt) Sold, 104 Farmer to Farmer, 1540
  • 13.
    Rice weed control Theproject tested Roundup with 25 farmers Was found cost effective by farmers (environment) Now, more emphasis on manual weeding which has positive effect on employment Farmers demonstrating on application of round up
  • 14.
    Rice straw usedfor livestock feed
  • 15.
    Rice straw treatmentwith urea for livestock feed
  • 16.
    Rice processors  2006– 09 processors – mostly in town  2011- over 120 in town and 30 in rural areas
  • 17.
    Progress against baseline Baseline 2004/05 2011 achievement X-Jigna (ha) NERICA-4 (ha) X-Jigna (ha) NERICA-4 (ha) Agro-ecology Lowland Upland Lowland Upland Upland kebele ≥ 1900masl - 0 6,058 48.605 Lowland Kebele ‹ 1900masl 5,409 0 9,435 6.185 Total 5,409 0 15,493 54.79
  • 18.
    White rice retailprice/kg from 2005 – 2011 during peak supply and short supply 12 10 8 Price/Kg 6 Peak supply (Feb. – Apr.) 4 Short supply (Aug. – Nov.) 2 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year
  • 19.
    Future market ofrice and by-products  Rice flour produced for rural markets  Relatively low quality processing  Processing partly based on fee, partly on paddy sale  X-Jigna suitable variety  White rice produced for urban market  Higher quality processing  Processing mostly based on purchase of paddy rice  Processing results in commercial by products for livestock feed (bran)
  • 20.
    Current price Items Unit Unit price Paddy Rice Ton 8,500 White rice Ton 11,400 -12,500 Rice bran +husk Ton 1,200
  • 21.
    NERICA-4 – whiterice variety
  • 22.
    Maize, finger millet,and rice mixture for making flour for Enjera
  • 23.
    Rice grain loadingfor Addis market
  • 24.
    Rice Bran andRice husk (chaff) loading for Addis market
  • 25.
    Relevant lessons forvalue chain supporters  Value chain development requires attention to different parts of the value chain in and over time  Involvement of private sector in marketing and processing will often take place spontaneously  Private sector can be supported with new knowledge on market opportunities and processing requirements  Continuous engagement is needed – post harvest management, processing
  • 26.
    Rice case studyon the IPMS website
  • 27.
    Good luck inyour value chain development work