2. HYPOTHESIS
STATEMENT OF THE RELATION SHIP BETWEEN
TWO OR MORE VARIABLES
POLIT AND BECK
HYPOTHESIS SHOULD ALWAYS BE WRITTEN
BEFORE THE STUDY AND SHOULD NOT BE
CHANGED AFTER THE STUDY RESULT ARE
EXAMINED.
3. PURPOSES OF HYPOTHESIS
ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE BY SUPPORTING OR
REJECTING THE TESTED THEORY
PROVIDES DIRECTION AND GUIDE TO A RESEARCH
STUDY
BRIDGE BETWEEN THEORY AND PRACTICE
FRAME WORK FOR DRAWING CONCLUSION OF A
RESEARCH STUDY.
`
4. CHARACTERISTIC OF A GOOD
HYPOTHESIS
CHARATERISTISCS OF HYPOTHESIS
SIMPLE CLEAR RELEVENT TESTABLE VERIFIABLE
12. NON DIRECTIONAL HYPOTHESIS
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE VARIABLES
BUT DOES NOT SPECIFY THE DIRECTIONS
OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VARIABLES.
13. ASSOCIATIVE HYPOTHESIS
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TWO OR MORE
THAN TWO VARIABLES THAT OCCUR IN
NATURE SETTING, SO ONE VARIABLE
CHANGE ANOTHER VARIABLE ALSO
CHANGE
16. CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD
HYPOTHESIS
SHOULD BE WRITTEN IN DECLARATIVE
SENTENCE
WRITTEN IN PRESENT TENSE
SHOULD CONTAIN POPULATION
CONTAIN THE VARIABLES
CONTAIN THE INSTRUMENTS AND TOOLS
REFLECT THE LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE.
17. COMPODENTS OF HYPOTHESIS
POPULATION
VARIABLES
INTRUMENTS AND TOOLS
LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
ANTICIPATED RELATIONSHIP
20. DELIMITATION
Delimitations are boundaries that are set by the
researcher in order to control the range of a study.
They are created before any investigations are carried
out in order to reduce the amount of time or effort
spent in certain unnecessary, and perhaps even
unrelated, areas to the overall study.
21. LIMITATIONS
The limitations of the study are those
characteristics of design or methodology that
impacted or influenced the interpretation of the
findings from your research
They are the constraints on generalizability,
applications to practice, and/or utility of findings
22. ETHICAL CONSIDERATION IN
RESEARCH
Ethical Considerations can be specified as one
of the most important parts of the research.
Research participants should not be subjected to
harm in any ways whats ever
. Full consent should be obtained from the
participants prior to the study.
23. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
BENIFICENCE
NONMALEFICENCE
PROTECTION FROM EXPLOITATION
RESPECT FOR HUMAN DIGNITY
SELF DETERMINATION
FULL EXPOSURE
JUSTICE
FAIR TREATMENT
PRIVACY
24. INFORMED CONSENT
It requires a full explanation of the nature, purpose
and material risks of the proposed procedures in a
language that the patient understands. The patient
should have opportunity to consider information and
ask questions in order to arrive at a balanced
judgement of whether to proceed with the proposed
treatment.
25. ELEMENTS OF INFORMED
CONCENT
1.RESEARCHERS ARE IDENTIFIED.
2.SUBJECT SELECTION PROCESS IS DISCRIBED
3.THE PURPOSE OF STUDY DISCRIBED
4.STUDY PROCEDURE ARE DISCUSSED
5.POTENTIAL RISKS AND BENIFICTS ARE
DISCRIBED
6.COMPENSATION,IFANY, DISCUSSED
26. RESPONSIBILITY OF A RESEARECHER
TO OBTAIN A INFORMED CONCENT
INVESTIGATOR MUST PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY
AND DESIRED INFORMATION TO THE PARTCIPANT
IT MUST BE ENSURED BY THE INVESTIGATOR IS
NOT INFLUENCED
A VERBAL INFORMED CONSENT MAY BE
OBTAINED,WHEN PARTICIPANTS REFUSE TO SIGN
OR GIVE THUMBIMPRESSION OR CANNOT BE DO.
27. VULNERABLE POPULATIONS-
‘Any participant who cannot make voluntary
decision to participate or is unable to understand
the research, especially the procedures and risks,