Part of the “Enhancing Prostate Cancer Care” MOOC 
Catherine Holborn 
Senior Lecturer in Radiotherapy & Oncology 
Sheffield Hallam University
Aim of the presentation 
To provide an overview of the key aspects of 
surgery in the radical treatment of localised and 
locally advanced prostate cancer 
This supplements the information already 
provided on the overall management of prostate 
cancer and the role of the main radical treatment 
options (surgery and radiotherapy)
Radical Prostatectomy 
Aim is to eradicate the cancer, preserve urinary 
continence and if possible, erectile function 
Involves removal of the entire prostate gland and 
resection of the seminal vesicles, plus a margin of 
surrounding tissue sufficient to achieve a negative margin 
The pelvic lymph nodes will also be removed for high risk 
localised and locally advanced prostate cancer, and also 
possibly for intermediate risk localised prostate cancer
Considerations 
For men with localised prostate cancer, surgery is a 
treatment option alongside radiotherapy 
A number of factors may influence their final decision 
Side effects are covered in a separate presentation 
What else may be a consideration? 
General health and suitability for surgery/general anaesthetic 
The psychological aspect of having the cancer removed from the 
body 
Success can be gauged early as the PSA levels should fall very 
quickly to negligible levels 
The prostate can be examined after surgery to more thoroughly 
assess grade/extra-capsular extension 
Less burden i.e. time spent attending hospital
Negative resection margin 
This is when the resected margin of surrounding tissue (especially 
the outer edge) is clear from any cancer cells, when examined under 
a microscope 
If cancer cells are seen, there is a chance that some may also remain 
in the body. Especially if these extend to the outer edge of the 
margin of tissue resected (a ‘positive’ resection margin) 
These can re-populate and signs of biochemical disease progression 
(rising PSA levels) may eventually occur. If left untreated, this may 
ultimately cause the man to develop clinical symptoms, indicative of 
more advanced disease 
A decision must be made as to whether further treatment (post-operative 
radiotherapy) is given immediately after surgery 
(‘adjuvant’ to), or in a ‘salvage’ setting (when biochemical 
progression occurs)
Surgical expertise 
An important factor , regardless of what surgical method 
is used 
It can influence the ability to achieve a negative resection 
margin (if this is possible given the clinical and 
pathological features of the cancer) 
It can also influence the ability to spare the neuro-vascular 
bundle (again, if this is possible) and in turn, help 
to preserve erectile function
The Neuro-Vascular Bundle (NVB) 
The NVB runs in the posterior-lateral grooves between 
the prostate and rectum. This is close to the peripheral 
zone were most prostate cancers arise and it is 
important to widely dissect around this area as a means 
of achieving a negative resection margin 
Removal of the NVB is responsible for the occurrence of 
erectile dysfunction 
Nerve sparing surgery (of one or both bundles) and 
careful excision around this area is possible but usually 
only for low risk, low volume cancers, maybe 
intermediate risk cancers
Traditional surgical methods 
The traditional method uses an ‘open’ incision 
This may be a ‘retropubic’ incision (via the abdomen) or a 
‘perineal’ incision (via the area between the scrotum and 
the anus) 
Perineal incision provides better access to the prostate 
and is associated with less blood loss; but is potentially 
more limiting in the amount of tissue that can be 
removed e.g. for larger glands/extra capsular spread and 
it is suggested that positive surgical margins may be more 
frequent with this approach as a result. It also doesn’t 
allow for the removal of lymph nodes if this is needed.
Laparoscopic (key hole) 
method 
Less invasive 
5 or 6 small openings are used (as opposed to one large 
one) 
This may be done by hand or robot assisted 
Key advantages are; a quicker procedure, less time spent 
as an in-patient, less surgical complications e.g. blood 
loss and the need for a blood transfusion 
Robotic prostatectomy is increasingly being used, instead 
of the aforementioned traditional methods
Recent evidence 
A recently published systematic literature review 
demonstrated that Robotic Prostatectomy was more 
favourable compared to open surgery and conventional 
laparoscopy, in terms of peri and intra operative 
complications and adverse events; and at least as equivalent 
to these in terms of positive margin rates 
 Reference 
Tewari A, Sooriakumuran P, Block DA, Sehsadri-Kreaden U, gerbert AE, Wiklund P. 
Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical 
treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 
retropubic, laparospcopic and robotic prostatectomy. European Urology. 2012. 62; 
pp.1-15
Post-op care 
During surgery, the prostate is detached from the bladder and 
the urethra. After careful excision, the bladder is then 
attached to the end of the urethra, to re-create the urinary 
tract and a temporary catheter is inserted to bridge this 
connection. 
This enables the urine to drain freely as the wound/stitches 
heal and prevents any build up of pressure being placed on 
these. 
It remains in position for approximately 2 weeks (can be as 
little as 3-4 days) and is usually removed in an outpatient 
setting. The man is allowed to leave once they have passed 
water normally. Whilst the catheter is in place, information 
about how to care for the catheter, to prevent infection, is 
important. 
The man is usually discharged from hospital up to a week post-op 
(could be much less with a robotic prostatectomy).
Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

  • 1.
    Part of the“Enhancing Prostate Cancer Care” MOOC Catherine Holborn Senior Lecturer in Radiotherapy & Oncology Sheffield Hallam University
  • 2.
    Aim of thepresentation To provide an overview of the key aspects of surgery in the radical treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer This supplements the information already provided on the overall management of prostate cancer and the role of the main radical treatment options (surgery and radiotherapy)
  • 3.
    Radical Prostatectomy Aimis to eradicate the cancer, preserve urinary continence and if possible, erectile function Involves removal of the entire prostate gland and resection of the seminal vesicles, plus a margin of surrounding tissue sufficient to achieve a negative margin The pelvic lymph nodes will also be removed for high risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer, and also possibly for intermediate risk localised prostate cancer
  • 4.
    Considerations For menwith localised prostate cancer, surgery is a treatment option alongside radiotherapy A number of factors may influence their final decision Side effects are covered in a separate presentation What else may be a consideration? General health and suitability for surgery/general anaesthetic The psychological aspect of having the cancer removed from the body Success can be gauged early as the PSA levels should fall very quickly to negligible levels The prostate can be examined after surgery to more thoroughly assess grade/extra-capsular extension Less burden i.e. time spent attending hospital
  • 5.
    Negative resection margin This is when the resected margin of surrounding tissue (especially the outer edge) is clear from any cancer cells, when examined under a microscope If cancer cells are seen, there is a chance that some may also remain in the body. Especially if these extend to the outer edge of the margin of tissue resected (a ‘positive’ resection margin) These can re-populate and signs of biochemical disease progression (rising PSA levels) may eventually occur. If left untreated, this may ultimately cause the man to develop clinical symptoms, indicative of more advanced disease A decision must be made as to whether further treatment (post-operative radiotherapy) is given immediately after surgery (‘adjuvant’ to), or in a ‘salvage’ setting (when biochemical progression occurs)
  • 6.
    Surgical expertise Animportant factor , regardless of what surgical method is used It can influence the ability to achieve a negative resection margin (if this is possible given the clinical and pathological features of the cancer) It can also influence the ability to spare the neuro-vascular bundle (again, if this is possible) and in turn, help to preserve erectile function
  • 7.
    The Neuro-Vascular Bundle(NVB) The NVB runs in the posterior-lateral grooves between the prostate and rectum. This is close to the peripheral zone were most prostate cancers arise and it is important to widely dissect around this area as a means of achieving a negative resection margin Removal of the NVB is responsible for the occurrence of erectile dysfunction Nerve sparing surgery (of one or both bundles) and careful excision around this area is possible but usually only for low risk, low volume cancers, maybe intermediate risk cancers
  • 8.
    Traditional surgical methods The traditional method uses an ‘open’ incision This may be a ‘retropubic’ incision (via the abdomen) or a ‘perineal’ incision (via the area between the scrotum and the anus) Perineal incision provides better access to the prostate and is associated with less blood loss; but is potentially more limiting in the amount of tissue that can be removed e.g. for larger glands/extra capsular spread and it is suggested that positive surgical margins may be more frequent with this approach as a result. It also doesn’t allow for the removal of lymph nodes if this is needed.
  • 9.
    Laparoscopic (key hole) method Less invasive 5 or 6 small openings are used (as opposed to one large one) This may be done by hand or robot assisted Key advantages are; a quicker procedure, less time spent as an in-patient, less surgical complications e.g. blood loss and the need for a blood transfusion Robotic prostatectomy is increasingly being used, instead of the aforementioned traditional methods
  • 10.
    Recent evidence Arecently published systematic literature review demonstrated that Robotic Prostatectomy was more favourable compared to open surgery and conventional laparoscopy, in terms of peri and intra operative complications and adverse events; and at least as equivalent to these in terms of positive margin rates  Reference Tewari A, Sooriakumuran P, Block DA, Sehsadri-Kreaden U, gerbert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparospcopic and robotic prostatectomy. European Urology. 2012. 62; pp.1-15
  • 11.
    Post-op care Duringsurgery, the prostate is detached from the bladder and the urethra. After careful excision, the bladder is then attached to the end of the urethra, to re-create the urinary tract and a temporary catheter is inserted to bridge this connection. This enables the urine to drain freely as the wound/stitches heal and prevents any build up of pressure being placed on these. It remains in position for approximately 2 weeks (can be as little as 3-4 days) and is usually removed in an outpatient setting. The man is allowed to leave once they have passed water normally. Whilst the catheter is in place, information about how to care for the catheter, to prevent infection, is important. The man is usually discharged from hospital up to a week post-op (could be much less with a robotic prostatectomy).