SlideShare a Scribd company logo
QUANTITATIVE
SURVEY FEEDBACK
By Luke Boulton
Question 1
■ Our trailer received responses that
told us that 70% of people liked the
trailer.
■ This is a positive sign that our trailer
did its job because the majority
enjoyed the trailer.
■ Also presents how our trailer has
successfully advertised our film as it
presents the film in a positive light.
■ On the other hand, 6 people did
answer no, and though this is
personal preference, further
questions will reveal the reasoning.
Question 2
■ This question also presented an overwhelming
majority as understanding the plot.
■ Though the point of the trailer isn’t so that the
audience know the exact narrative, it is key
that the audience at least understand what the
movie will be about.
■ However, the audience members that didn’t
understand the trailer aren’t a negative, as the
ambiguity of the narrative for these people
may entice them to watch the film anyway.
■ Although, those who answered ‘no’ are more
likely to not go see the film than the other two.
■ Furthermore, the not sure answer, answered
by 1, represents a majority that the ambiguity
has controlled them enough for the film to be
an enigma, likely enticing them to see the film.
Question 3
■ This question presents a highly
mixed responses, which could
suggest that all our elements are of
good quality.
■ However, the plot was the most
popular, a very important part for an
audience to like as that means it is
likely they will see the film.
■ Whereas, the other elements are
subjective and some could like them
while others do not.
Question 4
■ There seemed to be an overall
agreement that the music was the
weaker element within our trailer.
■ This is useful to know, however it
shouldn’t affect the likelihood of how
many people will go see our film as
the music within the trailer will be
different in the film.
■ On the other hand, the music being
of lesser quality affects the trailers
overall quality and therefore may
affect the audiences opinion of the
film.
Question 5
■ This question gave us insight into our
audiences preferred genre of film,
therefore we can see whether our film is
amidst that group, meaning that
audience may watch our film due to
previous experience with similar genres.
■ However, noir is a niche genre and so
will not be much like the mainstream
genres.This is depicted by noir receiving
two votes.
■ Although, an audience member doesn’t
need to love noir, or even know what it
is, to see our film and/or enjoy it.
Question 6
■ This question depicts how the
majority of audiences do not know
what noir is.
■ However, noir is a niche genre, that
celebrates being different, as it uses
a narrative style that no other genre
uses.
■ This doesn’t mean that our audience
will not want to see our film, it just
means that they likely won’t
understand the genre at first.
Question 7
■ This is another question that gives an
insight into our audiences personal
actions and preferences.
■ With this question we can see
whether the cinema is a popular
venture and if audiences go there a
lot.
■ From the responses we can see that
audiences often go to the cinema,
suggesting that our film will do
successfully in the cinema as
opposed to an internet release.
Question 8
■ This question offers insight into the
audiences experience with trailers.
■ Though the answers didn’t suggest that
audience always go see the film because
of the trailer, it does suggest that is
usually a main reason.
■ Therefore, our trailer is essential to the
promoting of our film, as without it we
miss out on a large audience.
■ Furthermore, our trailer is key to also
reaching the audience that doesn’t often
go to see the film, as the trailer is always
influential to the audiences choices.
Question
■ We then asked the audience to
rate the trailer.
■ Our trailer reach 3.8, which is
something that could be
improved further because 3.8
doesn’t sound impressive.
■ However, the lowest our trailer
was rated was a 3 and the
highest a 5, this is slightly more
impressive but the average of
these two is less so.
Question
■ This question asks the audience to
decide whether they want to see this
film in the cinema.
■ Few suggested that they were going
to and many decided to stay
tentative. This could be due to the
fact that this survey was not sent to
just our target audience but to a wide
range of people to receive an overall
understanding.
■ However, the majority did suggest
that them seeing this in the cinema is
likely, maybe or above, therefore
that is a positive.
To Conclude…
■ Overall, this survey offers advice on what to improve, what are the
positives and whether the audience would go see the film.
■ Furthermore, it offers quantitative data from a wide audience, as
opposed to a target one, meaning this data presents a overall response.

More Related Content

What's hot

Audience feedback
Audience feedbackAudience feedback
Audience feedback
hannahgrinham
 
Genre survey results
Genre survey resultsGenre survey results
Genre survey resultsHollieRackley
 
The Deprived | Written Questionnaire Results
The Deprived | Written Questionnaire ResultsThe Deprived | Written Questionnaire Results
The Deprived | Written Questionnaire Results
TheTobyHowell
 
Focus Group Questionnaire Results
Focus Group Questionnaire ResultsFocus Group Questionnaire Results
Focus Group Questionnaire ResultsAlysLeMoignan
 
Question 4
Question 4Question 4
Question 4
imunoztorre
 
Who would be the audience for your media product?
Who would be the audience for your media product? Who would be the audience for your media product?
Who would be the audience for your media product?
James Mclean
 
Survey results
Survey resultsSurvey results
Survey results
davidkimaita
 
Analysis of pilot questionnaire
Analysis of pilot questionnaireAnalysis of pilot questionnaire
Analysis of pilot questionnaire
AlexBurton250
 
Audience quantitative research & analysis
Audience quantitative research & analysisAudience quantitative research & analysis
Audience quantitative research & analysis
Kyri Lambis
 
Audience Quantitative Research & Analysis
Audience Quantitative Research & AnalysisAudience Quantitative Research & Analysis
Audience Quantitative Research & Analysis
Kyri Lambis
 
Q4 media evaluation
Q4 media evaluation Q4 media evaluation
Q4 media evaluation
Ibzie
 
Target audience research results
Target audience research resultsTarget audience research results
Target audience research results
Miles Capp
 
Questionnaire feedback analysis 16 18
Questionnaire feedback analysis 16 18Questionnaire feedback analysis 16 18
Questionnaire feedback analysis 16 18
FinleySinclair1
 
Questionnaire Analysis
Questionnaire AnalysisQuestionnaire Analysis
Questionnaire Analysis
misscarter123
 
Evaluation Q3 A2
Evaluation Q3 A2Evaluation Q3 A2
Evaluation Q3 A2
Shanice Philip
 
Thriller demographic research.
Thriller demographic research.Thriller demographic research.
Thriller demographic research.
FinleySinclair1
 
Poster/Text - Q5 - How did you attract/address your audience? - Media Evaluation
Poster/Text - Q5 - How did you attract/address your audience? - Media EvaluationPoster/Text - Q5 - How did you attract/address your audience? - Media Evaluation
Poster/Text - Q5 - How did you attract/address your audience? - Media Evaluationfsantosallan
 
Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]Alex Jarvis
 
Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]Alex Jarvis
 
Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]Alex Jarvis
 

What's hot (20)

Audience feedback
Audience feedbackAudience feedback
Audience feedback
 
Genre survey results
Genre survey resultsGenre survey results
Genre survey results
 
The Deprived | Written Questionnaire Results
The Deprived | Written Questionnaire ResultsThe Deprived | Written Questionnaire Results
The Deprived | Written Questionnaire Results
 
Focus Group Questionnaire Results
Focus Group Questionnaire ResultsFocus Group Questionnaire Results
Focus Group Questionnaire Results
 
Question 4
Question 4Question 4
Question 4
 
Who would be the audience for your media product?
Who would be the audience for your media product? Who would be the audience for your media product?
Who would be the audience for your media product?
 
Survey results
Survey resultsSurvey results
Survey results
 
Analysis of pilot questionnaire
Analysis of pilot questionnaireAnalysis of pilot questionnaire
Analysis of pilot questionnaire
 
Audience quantitative research & analysis
Audience quantitative research & analysisAudience quantitative research & analysis
Audience quantitative research & analysis
 
Audience Quantitative Research & Analysis
Audience Quantitative Research & AnalysisAudience Quantitative Research & Analysis
Audience Quantitative Research & Analysis
 
Q4 media evaluation
Q4 media evaluation Q4 media evaluation
Q4 media evaluation
 
Target audience research results
Target audience research resultsTarget audience research results
Target audience research results
 
Questionnaire feedback analysis 16 18
Questionnaire feedback analysis 16 18Questionnaire feedback analysis 16 18
Questionnaire feedback analysis 16 18
 
Questionnaire Analysis
Questionnaire AnalysisQuestionnaire Analysis
Questionnaire Analysis
 
Evaluation Q3 A2
Evaluation Q3 A2Evaluation Q3 A2
Evaluation Q3 A2
 
Thriller demographic research.
Thriller demographic research.Thriller demographic research.
Thriller demographic research.
 
Poster/Text - Q5 - How did you attract/address your audience? - Media Evaluation
Poster/Text - Q5 - How did you attract/address your audience? - Media EvaluationPoster/Text - Q5 - How did you attract/address your audience? - Media Evaluation
Poster/Text - Q5 - How did you attract/address your audience? - Media Evaluation
 
Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]
 
Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]
 
Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]Question eval[1]
Question eval[1]
 

Similar to Quantitative survey feedback

Joe Bodfish Evaluation Question 3
Joe Bodfish Evaluation Question 3Joe Bodfish Evaluation Question 3
Joe Bodfish Evaluation Question 3
a2medgroup2
 
Question 3
Question 3Question 3
Question 3
a2medgroup2
 
Pre questionnaire graphs
Pre questionnaire graphsPre questionnaire graphs
Pre questionnaire graphs
monicakigozi
 
Demographics
DemographicsDemographics
Demographics
shanice khalef
 
Audience feedback
Audience feedbackAudience feedback
Audience feedback
hannahgrinham
 
Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3suedehead25
 
Evaluation Question 5
Evaluation Question 5 Evaluation Question 5
Evaluation Question 5
MelissaMinshull
 
Audience feedback questionnaire
Audience feedback questionnaireAudience feedback questionnaire
Audience feedback questionnaireeuddin1
 
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3
jacobdriver
 
Feedback from survey
Feedback from surveyFeedback from survey
Feedback from survey
Emily Ventress
 
Question 5
Question 5Question 5
Question 5
jimmyallway213
 
Main task audience survey
Main task audience surveyMain task audience survey
Main task audience survey
TheMightyGabes
 
Question 5 evaluation
Question 5 evaluationQuestion 5 evaluation
Question 5 evaluation
SarahOlivier1
 
Questionnaire analysis 1
Questionnaire analysis 1Questionnaire analysis 1
Questionnaire analysis 1
sarahlouise12
 
Question 5 evaluation
Question 5 evaluationQuestion 5 evaluation
Question 5 evaluation
SarahOlivier1
 
Evaluation q3 v2
Evaluation q3 v2Evaluation q3 v2
Evaluation q3 v2
peter_c11
 

Similar to Quantitative survey feedback (20)

1hhh
1hhh1hhh
1hhh
 
1eval
1eval1eval
1eval
 
Joe Bodfish Evaluation Question 3
Joe Bodfish Evaluation Question 3Joe Bodfish Evaluation Question 3
Joe Bodfish Evaluation Question 3
 
Question 3
Question 3Question 3
Question 3
 
Pre questionnaire graphs
Pre questionnaire graphsPre questionnaire graphs
Pre questionnaire graphs
 
Demographics
DemographicsDemographics
Demographics
 
Audience feedback
Audience feedbackAudience feedback
Audience feedback
 
Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3
 
Evaluation Question 5
Evaluation Question 5 Evaluation Question 5
Evaluation Question 5
 
Audience feedback questionnaire
Audience feedback questionnaireAudience feedback questionnaire
Audience feedback questionnaire
 
Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3Evaluation question 3
Evaluation question 3
 
Feedback from survey
Feedback from surveyFeedback from survey
Feedback from survey
 
Question 5
Question 5Question 5
Question 5
 
Main task audience survey
Main task audience surveyMain task audience survey
Main task audience survey
 
Question 5 evaluation
Question 5 evaluationQuestion 5 evaluation
Question 5 evaluation
 
Question 3
Question 3Question 3
Question 3
 
Questionnaire analysis 1
Questionnaire analysis 1Questionnaire analysis 1
Questionnaire analysis 1
 
Question 5 evaluation
Question 5 evaluationQuestion 5 evaluation
Question 5 evaluation
 
2. fmp research
2. fmp research2. fmp research
2. fmp research
 
Evaluation q3 v2
Evaluation q3 v2Evaluation q3 v2
Evaluation q3 v2
 

Recently uploaded

How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
Jisc
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Atul Kumar Singh
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Tamralipta Mahavidyalaya
 
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
CarlosHernanMontoyab2
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Po-Chuan Chen
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxInstructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Jheel Barad
 
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdfLapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Jean Carlos Nunes Paixão
 
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
camakaiclarkmusic
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Atul Kumar Singh
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Anna Sz.
 
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxFrancesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
EduSkills OECD
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
Levi Shapiro
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Pavel ( NSTU)
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
GeoBlogs
 
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationA Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
Peter Windle
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
SACHIN R KONDAGURI
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Jisc
 

Recently uploaded (20)

How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
 
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
 
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdfAdversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
 
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxInstructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
 
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdfLapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
Lapbook sobre os Regimes Totalitários.pdf
 
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdfCACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
 
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th SemesterGuidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
Guidance_and_Counselling.pdf B.Ed. 4th Semester
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
 
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxFrancesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
 
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
 
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationA Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
 

Quantitative survey feedback

  • 2. Question 1 ■ Our trailer received responses that told us that 70% of people liked the trailer. ■ This is a positive sign that our trailer did its job because the majority enjoyed the trailer. ■ Also presents how our trailer has successfully advertised our film as it presents the film in a positive light. ■ On the other hand, 6 people did answer no, and though this is personal preference, further questions will reveal the reasoning.
  • 3. Question 2 ■ This question also presented an overwhelming majority as understanding the plot. ■ Though the point of the trailer isn’t so that the audience know the exact narrative, it is key that the audience at least understand what the movie will be about. ■ However, the audience members that didn’t understand the trailer aren’t a negative, as the ambiguity of the narrative for these people may entice them to watch the film anyway. ■ Although, those who answered ‘no’ are more likely to not go see the film than the other two. ■ Furthermore, the not sure answer, answered by 1, represents a majority that the ambiguity has controlled them enough for the film to be an enigma, likely enticing them to see the film.
  • 4. Question 3 ■ This question presents a highly mixed responses, which could suggest that all our elements are of good quality. ■ However, the plot was the most popular, a very important part for an audience to like as that means it is likely they will see the film. ■ Whereas, the other elements are subjective and some could like them while others do not.
  • 5. Question 4 ■ There seemed to be an overall agreement that the music was the weaker element within our trailer. ■ This is useful to know, however it shouldn’t affect the likelihood of how many people will go see our film as the music within the trailer will be different in the film. ■ On the other hand, the music being of lesser quality affects the trailers overall quality and therefore may affect the audiences opinion of the film.
  • 6. Question 5 ■ This question gave us insight into our audiences preferred genre of film, therefore we can see whether our film is amidst that group, meaning that audience may watch our film due to previous experience with similar genres. ■ However, noir is a niche genre and so will not be much like the mainstream genres.This is depicted by noir receiving two votes. ■ Although, an audience member doesn’t need to love noir, or even know what it is, to see our film and/or enjoy it.
  • 7. Question 6 ■ This question depicts how the majority of audiences do not know what noir is. ■ However, noir is a niche genre, that celebrates being different, as it uses a narrative style that no other genre uses. ■ This doesn’t mean that our audience will not want to see our film, it just means that they likely won’t understand the genre at first.
  • 8. Question 7 ■ This is another question that gives an insight into our audiences personal actions and preferences. ■ With this question we can see whether the cinema is a popular venture and if audiences go there a lot. ■ From the responses we can see that audiences often go to the cinema, suggesting that our film will do successfully in the cinema as opposed to an internet release.
  • 9. Question 8 ■ This question offers insight into the audiences experience with trailers. ■ Though the answers didn’t suggest that audience always go see the film because of the trailer, it does suggest that is usually a main reason. ■ Therefore, our trailer is essential to the promoting of our film, as without it we miss out on a large audience. ■ Furthermore, our trailer is key to also reaching the audience that doesn’t often go to see the film, as the trailer is always influential to the audiences choices.
  • 10. Question ■ We then asked the audience to rate the trailer. ■ Our trailer reach 3.8, which is something that could be improved further because 3.8 doesn’t sound impressive. ■ However, the lowest our trailer was rated was a 3 and the highest a 5, this is slightly more impressive but the average of these two is less so.
  • 11. Question ■ This question asks the audience to decide whether they want to see this film in the cinema. ■ Few suggested that they were going to and many decided to stay tentative. This could be due to the fact that this survey was not sent to just our target audience but to a wide range of people to receive an overall understanding. ■ However, the majority did suggest that them seeing this in the cinema is likely, maybe or above, therefore that is a positive.
  • 12. To Conclude… ■ Overall, this survey offers advice on what to improve, what are the positives and whether the audience would go see the film. ■ Furthermore, it offers quantitative data from a wide audience, as opposed to a target one, meaning this data presents a overall response.