AUDIENCE FEEDBACK
A REVIEW
QUESTION 1
• Most of the feed back from this question
was positive. We wanted the audience to
feel engaged and excited, to which the
majority did.
QUESTION 2
• Similarly to the video I filmed, I think a lot
of people may not have understood that
this was an opening sequence due to a lot
of stuff happening at once. If we were to
make the full length film, I think that it will
make a lot more sense as many things will
be explained.
QUESTION 3
• 93% voted that they’d watch the whole
film which is what we would like from the
audience. I can understand that if the
opening sequence isn’t easily understood to
some people, I can see why they would
prefer to not watch the entire film.
QUESTION 4
• We are glad that we would get a lot of
recommendations! For those who wouldn’t
it could be that they might not like the
genre as it can be boring or uninteresting
for them, but overall the response is good.
QUESTION 5
• As said by a friend in the video, the plot
line is very hard to relate to and we expect
that. However, if we were to ask someone
aged between 15-18 if they found the
characters relatable, they might agree as
they’d be around the same age and maybe
in education.
QUESTION 6
• Personally, we all thought the music was
a perfect fit, it built up in just the right
places, and most would agree with that also.
We didn’t want to have extremely dramatic
or loud music because that would cancel
out the eerie effect we wanted to achieve.
QUESTION 7
• Majority liked the female protagonist,
which we all think was a good choice and
wouldn’t change this even if we did the
production again. We thought that,
conventionally, it was the way forward.
QUESTION 8
• About half of the audience felt a physical
response, the other half didn’t. We wanted
to make our audience quite uncomfortable
and uneased, which we think we have
achieved. But for those who didn’t, maybe
we could’ve done more shots underwater,
perhaps in a flashback, but with our lack of
recourses and from the practice filming, we
think this would’ve been extremely difficult.
QUESTION 9
• The age of our audience varied from 15-
35, so from the feed back we can tell that
the majority of the people who took the
questionnaire, would’ve been fairy young as
the actors were all in their teens.
QUESTION 10
• We made our production as simple as
possible as we wanted our primary audience
to understand it as much as they could. We
achieved this as the majority liked its simple
nature. If we were to make the entire film,
we would make it slightly more challenging
to suit our secondary audience and to
reflect our independent institution.

Audience feedback

  • 1.
  • 2.
    QUESTION 1 • Mostof the feed back from this question was positive. We wanted the audience to feel engaged and excited, to which the majority did.
  • 3.
    QUESTION 2 • Similarlyto the video I filmed, I think a lot of people may not have understood that this was an opening sequence due to a lot of stuff happening at once. If we were to make the full length film, I think that it will make a lot more sense as many things will be explained.
  • 4.
    QUESTION 3 • 93%voted that they’d watch the whole film which is what we would like from the audience. I can understand that if the opening sequence isn’t easily understood to some people, I can see why they would prefer to not watch the entire film.
  • 5.
    QUESTION 4 • Weare glad that we would get a lot of recommendations! For those who wouldn’t it could be that they might not like the genre as it can be boring or uninteresting for them, but overall the response is good.
  • 6.
    QUESTION 5 • Assaid by a friend in the video, the plot line is very hard to relate to and we expect that. However, if we were to ask someone aged between 15-18 if they found the characters relatable, they might agree as they’d be around the same age and maybe in education.
  • 7.
    QUESTION 6 • Personally,we all thought the music was a perfect fit, it built up in just the right places, and most would agree with that also. We didn’t want to have extremely dramatic or loud music because that would cancel out the eerie effect we wanted to achieve.
  • 8.
    QUESTION 7 • Majorityliked the female protagonist, which we all think was a good choice and wouldn’t change this even if we did the production again. We thought that, conventionally, it was the way forward.
  • 9.
    QUESTION 8 • Abouthalf of the audience felt a physical response, the other half didn’t. We wanted to make our audience quite uncomfortable and uneased, which we think we have achieved. But for those who didn’t, maybe we could’ve done more shots underwater, perhaps in a flashback, but with our lack of recourses and from the practice filming, we think this would’ve been extremely difficult.
  • 10.
    QUESTION 9 • Theage of our audience varied from 15- 35, so from the feed back we can tell that the majority of the people who took the questionnaire, would’ve been fairy young as the actors were all in their teens.
  • 11.
    QUESTION 10 • Wemade our production as simple as possible as we wanted our primary audience to understand it as much as they could. We achieved this as the majority liked its simple nature. If we were to make the entire film, we would make it slightly more challenging to suit our secondary audience and to reflect our independent institution.