A comparative study on performance of high-rise steel building with and without bracings, carried
out on a residential building by considering the gravity loads and lateral loads in the form of Earth quake loads
and Wind loads incorporating the Bracings to reduce lateral loads on structural elements. In this study, a 20
storey steel frame structure has been selected to be idealized as multi storey steel building model. The model is
analyzed by using STAAD.Pro 2008 structural analysis software with the consideration of wind and earthquake
loads. At the same time the influence of X-bracing pattern has been investigated.The building proposed in
designed by Limit State Method according to steel code IS: 800-2007, the Wind load analysis according to IS:
875-(part-3)1987 and seismic/Earth quake loads according to IS: 1893 (Part-1)-2002. In this study the node
displacements of buildings having with and without bracings of wind and earthquake effect of Zone II and
Zone V, and the axial force of the members of the buildings having with and without bracings of wind and
earthquake effect of Zone II and Zone V.
Linear Dynamic Analysis of Different Structural Systems for Medium Rise Buil...Jamal Ali
A comparative study is carried out to examine the behavior of different structural systems under seismic loads in structurally irregular medium rise building. The structural systems analyzed in the case study include Intermediate Moment Resisting Frame (IMRF), Dual RCC Wall-Frame and RCC Braced Frame
Structures including Cross Braced, Single Diagonally Braced, V Braced and Inverted V Braced Frame Structure.
IRJET-Lateral Stability of High Rise Steel Buildings using E TABSIRJET Journal
This document summarizes a study on improving the lateral stability of high-rise steel buildings using different bracing systems. A 15-story steel building model was created and analyzed using ETABS software under wind and earthquake loads, with no bracing, X-bracing, and V-bracing. Results found that displacement was higher without bracing compared to braced models. X-bracing experienced higher lateral loads under wind, while V-bracing performed better under earthquake loads. More research is needed to further evaluate bracing systems for improving lateral stability of high-rise steel structures.
Topology optimisation of braced frames for high rise buildingsIAEME Publication
This document describes a study on using topology optimization techniques to design optimal braced frame layouts for high-rise buildings. Topology optimization aims to find the most efficient material layout to maximize structural performance while minimizing material usage. The study explores analytical aspects of optimal braced frame geometry and compares conventional and optimized bracing layouts in terms of deflection. Topology optimization was performed on a building module to minimize compliance and find a braced frame layout that provides maximum stiffness. The optimized layout was then analyzed using structural analysis software and compared to conventional bracing configurations.
Structural systems in high rise building and analysis methodsDP NITHIN
This presentation is about the structural systems in tall buildings and also consists of overview of methods of analysis in tall buildings like linear and non linear seismic analysis.
While Designing a High rise Load & Structural Analysis is major factor to consider. Here we analyzed some data and try to describe briefly. We hope that it will help you lot :) Done by Neeti Lamic, Bayezid, Sykot Hasan
The document discusses different types of outrigger concepts used in tall building design, including conventional, offset, alternative offset, and virtual outrigger concepts. It provides background on the conventional outrigger concept, which uses outrigger trusses extending from the building core to exterior columns. This concept has been widely used but has some limitations. Offset and alternative offset outrigger concepts address some of the conventional concept's problems. The document also discusses the virtual outrigger concept proposed by Nair, which uses basement walls and belt trusses/walls as alternative offset outriggers, transferring loads through a 2D horizontal and 3D vertical system. It investigates the use of different outrigger concepts in the world's tallest buildings.
The document outlines key design criteria for high-rise buildings, including:
1. Limit states design philosophy to ensure structures can withstand worst case loads during construction and usage with an acceptable probability of failure.
2. Consideration of construction sequencing and methods to allow for rapid erection given the large capital costs of high-rise projects.
3. Accounting for all expected gravitational and lateral loads over the building's lifetime, including combinations of dead, live, wind and earthquake loads.
Load analysis and structural considerationBee Key Verma
The document discusses various types of loads that act on buildings including dead loads, live loads, wind loads, seismic loads, and temperature loads. It also describes different structural systems for high-rise buildings that efficiently transfer loads, such as braced frames, shear walls, core and outrigger systems, bundled tubes, and diagrid systems. Basements are discussed as providing additional space in buildings for parking or other functions.
Linear Dynamic Analysis of Different Structural Systems for Medium Rise Buil...Jamal Ali
A comparative study is carried out to examine the behavior of different structural systems under seismic loads in structurally irregular medium rise building. The structural systems analyzed in the case study include Intermediate Moment Resisting Frame (IMRF), Dual RCC Wall-Frame and RCC Braced Frame
Structures including Cross Braced, Single Diagonally Braced, V Braced and Inverted V Braced Frame Structure.
IRJET-Lateral Stability of High Rise Steel Buildings using E TABSIRJET Journal
This document summarizes a study on improving the lateral stability of high-rise steel buildings using different bracing systems. A 15-story steel building model was created and analyzed using ETABS software under wind and earthquake loads, with no bracing, X-bracing, and V-bracing. Results found that displacement was higher without bracing compared to braced models. X-bracing experienced higher lateral loads under wind, while V-bracing performed better under earthquake loads. More research is needed to further evaluate bracing systems for improving lateral stability of high-rise steel structures.
Topology optimisation of braced frames for high rise buildingsIAEME Publication
This document describes a study on using topology optimization techniques to design optimal braced frame layouts for high-rise buildings. Topology optimization aims to find the most efficient material layout to maximize structural performance while minimizing material usage. The study explores analytical aspects of optimal braced frame geometry and compares conventional and optimized bracing layouts in terms of deflection. Topology optimization was performed on a building module to minimize compliance and find a braced frame layout that provides maximum stiffness. The optimized layout was then analyzed using structural analysis software and compared to conventional bracing configurations.
Structural systems in high rise building and analysis methodsDP NITHIN
This presentation is about the structural systems in tall buildings and also consists of overview of methods of analysis in tall buildings like linear and non linear seismic analysis.
While Designing a High rise Load & Structural Analysis is major factor to consider. Here we analyzed some data and try to describe briefly. We hope that it will help you lot :) Done by Neeti Lamic, Bayezid, Sykot Hasan
The document discusses different types of outrigger concepts used in tall building design, including conventional, offset, alternative offset, and virtual outrigger concepts. It provides background on the conventional outrigger concept, which uses outrigger trusses extending from the building core to exterior columns. This concept has been widely used but has some limitations. Offset and alternative offset outrigger concepts address some of the conventional concept's problems. The document also discusses the virtual outrigger concept proposed by Nair, which uses basement walls and belt trusses/walls as alternative offset outriggers, transferring loads through a 2D horizontal and 3D vertical system. It investigates the use of different outrigger concepts in the world's tallest buildings.
The document outlines key design criteria for high-rise buildings, including:
1. Limit states design philosophy to ensure structures can withstand worst case loads during construction and usage with an acceptable probability of failure.
2. Consideration of construction sequencing and methods to allow for rapid erection given the large capital costs of high-rise projects.
3. Accounting for all expected gravitational and lateral loads over the building's lifetime, including combinations of dead, live, wind and earthquake loads.
Load analysis and structural considerationBee Key Verma
The document discusses various types of loads that act on buildings including dead loads, live loads, wind loads, seismic loads, and temperature loads. It also describes different structural systems for high-rise buildings that efficiently transfer loads, such as braced frames, shear walls, core and outrigger systems, bundled tubes, and diagrid systems. Basements are discussed as providing additional space in buildings for parking or other functions.
structure, technology and materials of highrise buildingsshahul130103
Structural loads on tall buildings include dead loads, live loads, and environmental loads from seismic activity, wind, and temperature changes. Tall buildings must have structural systems to effectively distribute these loads and resist lateral forces. Common structural typologies include interior moment frames, shear walls, outrigger systems, and exterior tube, diagrid, and bundled tube systems which use closely spaced columns and beams to act as a rigid perimeter wall. The structural forms vary based on the building material (concrete or steel) and optimize the building's ability to transfer loads vertically and resist lateral loads like wind and seismic forces.
Lecture 1 building structure-an introduction-r2Aida Amalina
The document discusses the analysis of plane truss structures. It begins by outlining the major stages in building construction and engineering analysis and design. It then covers the classification of structures, including bending structures, shear structures, tension structures, compression structures, and trusses. The remainder of the document focuses on analyzing plane trusses, including determining the structural condition, identifying zero-force members, determining support reaction forces, and determining internal member forces.
This document discusses the use of steel in buildings and provides details on three specific structures:
1. The Hearst Tower features a diagrid steel frame that saves 20% of steel and allows for an open interior floorplan. Over 90% of its steel is recycled.
2. HL23 is a residential tower with a custom stainless steel and glass curtain wall. It employs a reverse-tapering shape to maximize floorspace within its small footprint.
3. Burj Al Arab hotel is designed to resemble a ship sail. It has an exoskeleton steel frame and truss system to transfer loads to the central spine and foundation.
Study of Eccentrically Braced Outrigger Frame under Seismic ExitationIJTET Journal
Outrigger braced structures has efficient structural form consist of a central core, comprising braced frames with
horizontal cantilever ”outrigger” trusses or girders connecting the core to the outer column. When the structure is loaded
horizontally, vertical plane rotation of the core is restrained by the outriggers through tension in windward column and
compression in leeward column. The effective structural depth of the building is greatly increased, thus augmenting the lateral
stiffness of the building and reducing the lateral deflections and moments in core. In effect, the outriggers join the columns to the
core to make the structure behave as a partly composite cantilever. By providing eccentrically braced system in outrigger frame by
varying the size of links and analyzing it. Push over analysis is carried out by varying the link size using computer programs, Sap
2007 to understand their seismic performance. The ductile behavior of eccentrically braced frame is highly desirable for structures
subjected to strong ground motion. Maximum stiffness, strength, ductility and energy dissipation capacity are provided by
eccentrically braced frame. Studies were conducted on the use of outrigger frame for the high steel building subjected to
earthquake load. Braces are designed not to buckle, regardless of the severity of lateral loading on the frame. Thus eccentrically
braced frame ensures safety against collapse.
RESPONSE OF LATERAL SYSTEM IN HIGH RISE BUILDING UNDER SEISMIC LOADSIjripublishers Ijri
Tall building development has been rapidly increasing worldwide introducing new challenges that need to be met through
engineering judgment. In modern tall buildings, lateral loads induced by wind or earthquake are often resisted by a
system of coupled shear walls. But when the building increases in height, the stiffness of the structure becomes more
important and introduction of outrigger beams between the shear walls and external columns is often used to provide
sufficient lateral stiffness to the structure. In general, earthquake ground motion can occur anywhere in the world and
the risk associated with tall buildings, especially under severe earthquakes, should be given particular attention, since
tall buildings often accommodate thousands of occupants.
Tall structures are ;
Flexible, low in damping, slender and light in weight.
Sensitive to dynamic wind loads.
Adversely affect the serviceability and occupant comfort.
Oscillations are observed in the along-wind and crosswind directions and in torsional mode.
Behaviour of wind response is largely determined by building shapes.
Aerodynamic optimization of building shapes is the most efficient way to achieve wind resistant design.
In ancient China, tall buildings appear to be those of traditional pagodas.
Lecture 9 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering IaşiUrsachi Răzvan
1) Multi-storey steel structures use steel columns, beams, girders, and bracing systems to support vertical loads and resist lateral forces. Columns vary in cross-section depending on load and may be welded, bolted, or have base plates anchored in concrete.
2) Beams and girders are designed to bend and can be continuous or use lattice girders for large spans. Connections between columns and girders vary from articulated to rigid.
3) Floors commonly use steel beams with cast-in-place concrete slabs or prefabricated decking. External walls are often curtain walls comprising mullions and transoms.
This document discusses the analysis of multi-story buildings. It begins by introducing structural analysis and the different load types buildings must withstand. It then describes five common structural systems for multi-story buildings: (1) load bearing wall systems, (2) buildings with flexural systems, (3) moment resisting frame systems, (4) dual frame systems, and (5) tube systems. For each system, it provides details on how the system resists gravity and lateral loads.
The document discusses high rise buildings and their structures. It defines high rise buildings as between 35-100 meters tall or 12-39 floors. Buildings over 100m are called skyscrapers and over 600m are mega-tall. High rises are constructed to address land scarcity in urban areas and increasing demand for space. Their structures have evolved from early stone and iron frames to steel skeleton frames to reinforced concrete shear walls and core structures. Foundations must transfer enormous loads into the ground through methods like raft or pile foundations. Interior structures use rigid frames, shear walls, and exterior structures employ tube systems to resist lateral wind and seismic loads.
presentation gives data on "how Modeling procedure and Case study of ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’ was done" and how mathematics and finite elemental analysis are useful for as a part of analysis of stresses strain,wind loading..ect.
This document provides an introduction and overview of the structural design considerations for tall buildings. It discusses how mankind has sought to build taller structures throughout history as symbols of power. For tall buildings, lateral loads from wind and earthquakes must be effectively resisted to prevent shear failure, overturning, or excessive deflection. Various lateral load resisting systems are explored, including moment frames, braced frames, tube structures, and outrigger systems. Rigidity indices are used to compare the bending and shear resistance of different structural configurations. The challenges of seismic design are also addressed. The document reviews previous research on improving the performance of reinforced concrete frames through the addition of bracing or shear walls.
The document discusses various types of tall buildings and earthquake resistant design strategies. It describes bundled tube, framed tube, braced tube, and tube-in-tube structural systems that are used for tall buildings. The document also summarizes the Bhuj earthquake that occurred in Gujarat in 2001 and killed over 19,000 people. It provides steps for seismic design including planning symmetrical buildings, avoiding soft stories, using ductile materials, and providing vertical load paths like shear walls, bracing, and tuned mass dampers.
Final presentation by Akramul masum from southeast university bangladesh.Integrated Design
This document provides information about a study on the analysis and design of high-rise buildings. It defines what constitutes a high-rise building and explores the various factors driving demand for them. It examines the history of tall buildings and provides a chart showing increases in building heights over time. It also discusses structural systems and loads, including gravity, lateral and special loads. Core functions, parking considerations and case studies of high-rise projects are presented.
Study of lateral load resisting systems of variable heights in all soil types...eSAT Publishing House
This document summarizes a study on the effects of different lateral load resisting systems (shear walls and bracing) at variable heights (15m, 30m, 45m, 60m, 75m) in high seismic zone V for all soil types. Finite element software was used to model multi-story buildings with a square plan of 20m x 20m and 5m bays. Response spectrum analysis was conducted according to Indian codes to determine seismic parameters like base shear, lateral displacements, and drifts. The objectives were to compare these parameters for bare frames and frames with shear walls or bracing at different heights in order to evaluate their effectiveness in resisting earthquake effects.
Design of tall buildings lecture-1-part-2-dr-shafiul-bari-sirjibonghosh
This document outlines the course ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TALL BUILDINGS. It provides information on the instructor, required books, class lectures, and sample content from Lecture 1. Lecture 1 introduces key concepts like the definition of a tall building, classification of tall buildings, structural systems, selection of structural systems based on building function, gravity and lateral load resisting systems, and examples of floor slab systems.
Braced steel frames are commonly used to resist lateral loads from earthquakes. There are two main types of bracing configurations: concentric and eccentric. Cross bracing provides the highest lateral stiffness compared to diagonal bracing or unbraced frames. Analysis of a sample braced steel frame model found that cross bracing reduced story drift by 87% and column shear and bending moments compared to an unbraced frame. However, axial forces in the columns increased with the addition of bracing. Response spectrum analysis accounted for multiple vibration modes while time history analysis used specific earthquake acceleration records over time. Cross bracing consistently performed best at reducing lateral deformation and forces in the frame.
This document provides an overview of structural concrete design and structural systems for reinforced concrete buildings. It discusses the basic functions of building structural systems to support gravity and lateral loads. It also describes various types of loads and reinforced concrete structural systems, including different types of floor systems like flat plate, flat slab, and joist systems. Finally, it discusses common reinforced concrete structural members like beams, columns, slabs/plates, and walls/diaphragms.
structure, technology and materials of highrise buildingsshahul130103
Structural loads on tall buildings include dead loads, live loads, and environmental loads from seismic activity, wind, and temperature changes. Tall buildings must have structural systems to effectively distribute these loads and resist lateral forces. Common structural typologies include interior moment frames, shear walls, outrigger systems, and exterior tube, diagrid, and bundled tube systems which use closely spaced columns and beams to act as a rigid perimeter wall. The structural forms vary based on the building material (concrete or steel) and optimize the building's ability to transfer loads vertically and resist lateral loads like wind and seismic forces.
Lecture 1 building structure-an introduction-r2Aida Amalina
The document discusses the analysis of plane truss structures. It begins by outlining the major stages in building construction and engineering analysis and design. It then covers the classification of structures, including bending structures, shear structures, tension structures, compression structures, and trusses. The remainder of the document focuses on analyzing plane trusses, including determining the structural condition, identifying zero-force members, determining support reaction forces, and determining internal member forces.
This document discusses the use of steel in buildings and provides details on three specific structures:
1. The Hearst Tower features a diagrid steel frame that saves 20% of steel and allows for an open interior floorplan. Over 90% of its steel is recycled.
2. HL23 is a residential tower with a custom stainless steel and glass curtain wall. It employs a reverse-tapering shape to maximize floorspace within its small footprint.
3. Burj Al Arab hotel is designed to resemble a ship sail. It has an exoskeleton steel frame and truss system to transfer loads to the central spine and foundation.
Study of Eccentrically Braced Outrigger Frame under Seismic ExitationIJTET Journal
Outrigger braced structures has efficient structural form consist of a central core, comprising braced frames with
horizontal cantilever ”outrigger” trusses or girders connecting the core to the outer column. When the structure is loaded
horizontally, vertical plane rotation of the core is restrained by the outriggers through tension in windward column and
compression in leeward column. The effective structural depth of the building is greatly increased, thus augmenting the lateral
stiffness of the building and reducing the lateral deflections and moments in core. In effect, the outriggers join the columns to the
core to make the structure behave as a partly composite cantilever. By providing eccentrically braced system in outrigger frame by
varying the size of links and analyzing it. Push over analysis is carried out by varying the link size using computer programs, Sap
2007 to understand their seismic performance. The ductile behavior of eccentrically braced frame is highly desirable for structures
subjected to strong ground motion. Maximum stiffness, strength, ductility and energy dissipation capacity are provided by
eccentrically braced frame. Studies were conducted on the use of outrigger frame for the high steel building subjected to
earthquake load. Braces are designed not to buckle, regardless of the severity of lateral loading on the frame. Thus eccentrically
braced frame ensures safety against collapse.
RESPONSE OF LATERAL SYSTEM IN HIGH RISE BUILDING UNDER SEISMIC LOADSIjripublishers Ijri
Tall building development has been rapidly increasing worldwide introducing new challenges that need to be met through
engineering judgment. In modern tall buildings, lateral loads induced by wind or earthquake are often resisted by a
system of coupled shear walls. But when the building increases in height, the stiffness of the structure becomes more
important and introduction of outrigger beams between the shear walls and external columns is often used to provide
sufficient lateral stiffness to the structure. In general, earthquake ground motion can occur anywhere in the world and
the risk associated with tall buildings, especially under severe earthquakes, should be given particular attention, since
tall buildings often accommodate thousands of occupants.
Tall structures are ;
Flexible, low in damping, slender and light in weight.
Sensitive to dynamic wind loads.
Adversely affect the serviceability and occupant comfort.
Oscillations are observed in the along-wind and crosswind directions and in torsional mode.
Behaviour of wind response is largely determined by building shapes.
Aerodynamic optimization of building shapes is the most efficient way to achieve wind resistant design.
In ancient China, tall buildings appear to be those of traditional pagodas.
Lecture 9 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering IaşiUrsachi Răzvan
1) Multi-storey steel structures use steel columns, beams, girders, and bracing systems to support vertical loads and resist lateral forces. Columns vary in cross-section depending on load and may be welded, bolted, or have base plates anchored in concrete.
2) Beams and girders are designed to bend and can be continuous or use lattice girders for large spans. Connections between columns and girders vary from articulated to rigid.
3) Floors commonly use steel beams with cast-in-place concrete slabs or prefabricated decking. External walls are often curtain walls comprising mullions and transoms.
This document discusses the analysis of multi-story buildings. It begins by introducing structural analysis and the different load types buildings must withstand. It then describes five common structural systems for multi-story buildings: (1) load bearing wall systems, (2) buildings with flexural systems, (3) moment resisting frame systems, (4) dual frame systems, and (5) tube systems. For each system, it provides details on how the system resists gravity and lateral loads.
The document discusses high rise buildings and their structures. It defines high rise buildings as between 35-100 meters tall or 12-39 floors. Buildings over 100m are called skyscrapers and over 600m are mega-tall. High rises are constructed to address land scarcity in urban areas and increasing demand for space. Their structures have evolved from early stone and iron frames to steel skeleton frames to reinforced concrete shear walls and core structures. Foundations must transfer enormous loads into the ground through methods like raft or pile foundations. Interior structures use rigid frames, shear walls, and exterior structures employ tube systems to resist lateral wind and seismic loads.
presentation gives data on "how Modeling procedure and Case study of ‘Gocheok Sky Dome’ was done" and how mathematics and finite elemental analysis are useful for as a part of analysis of stresses strain,wind loading..ect.
This document provides an introduction and overview of the structural design considerations for tall buildings. It discusses how mankind has sought to build taller structures throughout history as symbols of power. For tall buildings, lateral loads from wind and earthquakes must be effectively resisted to prevent shear failure, overturning, or excessive deflection. Various lateral load resisting systems are explored, including moment frames, braced frames, tube structures, and outrigger systems. Rigidity indices are used to compare the bending and shear resistance of different structural configurations. The challenges of seismic design are also addressed. The document reviews previous research on improving the performance of reinforced concrete frames through the addition of bracing or shear walls.
The document discusses various types of tall buildings and earthquake resistant design strategies. It describes bundled tube, framed tube, braced tube, and tube-in-tube structural systems that are used for tall buildings. The document also summarizes the Bhuj earthquake that occurred in Gujarat in 2001 and killed over 19,000 people. It provides steps for seismic design including planning symmetrical buildings, avoiding soft stories, using ductile materials, and providing vertical load paths like shear walls, bracing, and tuned mass dampers.
Final presentation by Akramul masum from southeast university bangladesh.Integrated Design
This document provides information about a study on the analysis and design of high-rise buildings. It defines what constitutes a high-rise building and explores the various factors driving demand for them. It examines the history of tall buildings and provides a chart showing increases in building heights over time. It also discusses structural systems and loads, including gravity, lateral and special loads. Core functions, parking considerations and case studies of high-rise projects are presented.
Study of lateral load resisting systems of variable heights in all soil types...eSAT Publishing House
This document summarizes a study on the effects of different lateral load resisting systems (shear walls and bracing) at variable heights (15m, 30m, 45m, 60m, 75m) in high seismic zone V for all soil types. Finite element software was used to model multi-story buildings with a square plan of 20m x 20m and 5m bays. Response spectrum analysis was conducted according to Indian codes to determine seismic parameters like base shear, lateral displacements, and drifts. The objectives were to compare these parameters for bare frames and frames with shear walls or bracing at different heights in order to evaluate their effectiveness in resisting earthquake effects.
Design of tall buildings lecture-1-part-2-dr-shafiul-bari-sirjibonghosh
This document outlines the course ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF TALL BUILDINGS. It provides information on the instructor, required books, class lectures, and sample content from Lecture 1. Lecture 1 introduces key concepts like the definition of a tall building, classification of tall buildings, structural systems, selection of structural systems based on building function, gravity and lateral load resisting systems, and examples of floor slab systems.
Braced steel frames are commonly used to resist lateral loads from earthquakes. There are two main types of bracing configurations: concentric and eccentric. Cross bracing provides the highest lateral stiffness compared to diagonal bracing or unbraced frames. Analysis of a sample braced steel frame model found that cross bracing reduced story drift by 87% and column shear and bending moments compared to an unbraced frame. However, axial forces in the columns increased with the addition of bracing. Response spectrum analysis accounted for multiple vibration modes while time history analysis used specific earthquake acceleration records over time. Cross bracing consistently performed best at reducing lateral deformation and forces in the frame.
This document provides an overview of structural concrete design and structural systems for reinforced concrete buildings. It discusses the basic functions of building structural systems to support gravity and lateral loads. It also describes various types of loads and reinforced concrete structural systems, including different types of floor systems like flat plate, flat slab, and joist systems. Finally, it discusses common reinforced concrete structural members like beams, columns, slabs/plates, and walls/diaphragms.
The document provides a summary of a financial services technology summit that took place in November 2015 in Austin, Texas. It discusses the keynote speakers, workshop topics, and solution provider contact information. The main points are:
1) The summit focused on digital disruption, business transformation, and using data to better understand customer needs. Workshops covered topics like change management, data strategy, and designing for emotional impact.
2) A lunch keynote discussed how data diodes provide stronger cybersecurity than firewalls for data replication and transfer between networks.
3) Contact information is provided for over 30 solution providers that attended the summit to facilitate continued conversations around challenges and opportunities.
O programa Share Bless é um grupo de apoio e incentivo a contribuição espontânea, composto por um grupo de pessoas com o objetivo em comum de se ajudar mutualmente a obter uma melhor qualidade de vida.
This document analyzes and discusses the connection designs of precast load bearing walls in multi-story buildings subjected to seismic and wind loads. It presents the modeling and analysis of a G+11 story precast concrete shear wall structure using ETABS software. The effects of various seismic zones and wind speeds on structural responses like out-of-plane moments, axial forces, shear forces, base shear, story drift, and tensile forces in the shear walls are extracted and plotted. Maximum values of these responses at different story levels are compared for different seismic zones and wind speeds. Finally, the effect of seismic zone and wind zone on the structural behavior is summarized in tabular form.
Study of Wind Loads on Steel Building with and Without Different Braced Syste...IRJET Journal
This document summarizes a study analyzing the performance of a 40-story steel building under wind loads using different bracing systems in Tekla Structures software. The building was modeled without bracing and with V-bracing, X-bracing, and chevron bracing. Parameters like natural period, story drift, and displacement were compared. The results showed that the chevron bracing design provided the best structural performance with the shortest natural periods and lowest displacements and drifts. Thus, chevron bracing was the most effective at reducing a building's motion under wind loads compared to the other bracing configurations studied.
Study on Effect of Wind Load and Earthquake Load on Multi-storey RC Framed Bu...IJSRD
This document summarizes a study on the effects of wind and earthquake loads on multi-storey reinforced concrete framed buildings. Six different building models with varying use of shear walls were analyzed using structural analysis software to determine parameters like base shear, displacement, story drift, story forces. Results showed that models incorporating shear walls experienced reduced displacement, drift and forces compared to models without shear walls. As lateral loads like wind and earthquakes become more influential in tall building design, shear walls can effectively resist these loads and provide a more stable and economic structure.
The optimum location of shear wall in high rise r.c bulidings under lateral l...eSAT Journals
Abstract Shear walls are the structural elements of the horizontal force resisting system .shear walls have high influence stiffness and strength and provided to resist gravity loads as well as lateral loads caused by seismic and wind. So many literatures are available to analyze and design of shear wall. However the optimum location and its effects in high rise r.c.buildings is not much discussed in any literatures. In this paper the main aim is to find the effective, efficient, and optimum location of shear walls in high rise irregular R.C building. In this present study the optimum location of shear wall has been investigated with the help of three different models. Model 1 is bare frame structural system and other two models are dual type structural system with central core wall and corner shear wall. An earthquake load is calculated as per IS 1893(PART-1)-2002 and applied to (G+20) storey R.C building in zone-2 and zone-5. The analysis is performed using ETABS 9.7.4 Software package. Keywords: Shear wall, Irregular building, ETABS, analysis of structure, High rise building
Wind and Seismic Analysis of Building with Bracing System Resting on Sloping ...IRJET Journal
This document summarizes a research study that analyzed the wind and seismic performance of buildings with different bracing systems on sloping ground. The study used ETABS software to model and analyze step back buildings with various bracing types, including X, V, inverted V, and diagonal bracing. Results showed that X bracing provided the best performance in terms of maximum displacement, drift, base shear, and fundamental time period. Step back buildings with X bracing demonstrated superior performance under wind and seismic loads compared to step back setback buildings. The effectiveness of bracing was found to be limited for buildings over 6 stories or with an increased number of bays along the slope. Increasing bays across the slope enhanced building performance with bra
Structural Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Dome with Shell System under Vari...ijtsrd
There are many different systems constructing dome structure. Among them, the shell system is the most popular in reinforcement concrete structure in these days. Therefore, it is necessary to know the structural behaviours of it. The objectives of this journal is to study the structural behaviours of the reinforced concrete dome structure with shell system under gravity loading and lateral loading in cyclone wind categories and various seismic zones. Seismic loads are considered from zone 1 to zone 4 based on UBC 1997 .Wind loads are considered from I to V category as cyclone categories. Structural elements of RC dome structure are designed according to Building Code of American Concrete Institute ACI 318 99 . With these member forces obtained from the SAP 2000 analysis, the design for all structural members will be performed according to ACI 318 99. The members of dome structure are designed as an intermediate moment resisting frame. The design of the shell beams is verified by using hand calculations with the output forces under the gravity loading and lateral loading obtained from the SAP2000 analysis. Equivalent static analysis procedure is used in this study. Based on the comparison of analysis results, it can be observed where the maximum deflection occurs along the meridian direction under seismic and wind loading conditions. Then, the axial force of dome structure is significant than any other forces in shell system. From the study of analysis results of both systems, it has been noticed that the bottom ring in shell system is essential to control the forces from the shell area. Khine Zar Aung | Khin Aye Mon | Khin Thanda Htun "Structural Behaviors of Reinforced Concrete Dome with Shell System under Various Loading Conditions" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-5 , August 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd27839.pdfPaper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/civil-engineering/27839/structural-behaviors-of-reinforced-concrete-dome-with-shell-system-under-various-loading-conditions/khine-zar-aung
Study of Seismic and Wind Effect on Multi-Storey R.C.C. Building using ETABSIRJET Journal
The document discusses analyzing the effects of building height on base shear and lateral forces due to earthquake and wind loads using ETABS software. A multi-story irregular building is modeled and analyzed at different heights. Results for wind and earthquake loads are compared at various stories to determine the minimum height at which wind load dominates over earthquake load. The analysis includes modeling the building, applying dead, live, wind and earthquake loads, and evaluating base shear, shear forces, and bending moments.
Study of Self Compacting Concrete by using Marginal Materials-Partial Replace...IRJET Journal
The document analyzes the effects of building height on base shear and lateral forces generated by earthquake and wind loads using ETABS software. A multi-storey irregular structure is modeled and analyzed at different heights. Load combinations including dead load, live load, wind load, and earthquake load are considered. Base shear values and lateral forces are calculated at various storeys. The minimum height at which wind load dominates over earthquake load is determined. Force coefficients and base shear results for different load combinations are presented for the 11th to 5th storeys. The analysis aims to compare wind and earthquake loads at varying heights and identify the height where wind load exceeds earthquake load.
IRJET- A Research on Comparing the Effect of Seismic Waves on Multistoried Bu...IRJET Journal
The document compares the effect of seismic waves on multistoried buildings with and without shear walls and flanged concrete columns. Three 10-story building models are analyzed using STAAD Pro: Model 1 without seismic resisting structures, Model 2 with concentrically located shear walls along the exterior, and Model 3 with flanged concrete columns along the exterior. Model 2 and 3 experience approximately 10% less lateral force and base shear compared to Model 1. Introducing shear walls or flanged columns improves seismic performance by increasing stiffness and reducing displacements, stresses, and forces in the building. While shear walls provide the greatest stability, flanged columns also enhance seismic resistance and may be more economical for some applications.
Wind Analysis and Design of G+11 Storied Building using STAAD-ProIRJET Journal
This document presents a study analyzing wind loads on a G+11 storied reinforced concrete building using STAAD-Pro software. A 3D model of the building was created in STAAD-Pro based on specified dimensions and material properties. Wind loads were estimated according to Indian code IS 875 (Part 3)-1987, taking into account basic wind speed, zone factor, and height factor. Static analysis was performed considering dead load, live load, and wind load. Results found that deflection and forces increased with height and were highest under wind load in the x-direction. The study concluded wind loads are more critical for tall structures and designs should consider loads in both directions to determine critical forces.
P-Delta Effects on Tall RC Buildings with and Without Shear WallIRJET Journal
This document discusses the P-delta effect on tall reinforced concrete buildings with and without shear walls. P-delta is a second-order geometric nonlinearity effect that occurs when axial loads cause additional deflection in structures. The study analyzes a 20-story RC building model in ETABS to compare displacements, bending moments, and other parameters with and without considering P-delta effects under seismic and wind loads. Results show that P-delta effects decrease story displacements when shear walls are used and bending moments increase slightly in columns and shear walls after accounting for P-delta.
Analysis of Wind Load on Tall Building of Various Aspect RatiosIRJET Journal
This document analyzes the wind load effects on tall buildings of various aspect ratios through computer modeling and simulation. Four 30-story building models were created with horizontal aspect ratios of 1, 2.25, 4, and 9 to represent buildings with plan dimensions of 60m x 60m, 90m x 40m, 120m x 30m, and 180m x 20m respectively. Wind loads were calculated according to Indian standards and applied to the models. Results show that maximum displacement and story drift increase with higher aspect ratios as the buildings become more susceptible to wind loads. The 180m x 20m building exhibited much greater displacement than the other models. Axial forces in columns and bending moments also rose with larger aspect ratios. The
Study of Comparison Between Static and Dynamic Analysis Subjected to Wind and...IRJET Journal
This document discusses a study comparing static and dynamic analysis of wind and earthquake loads on high-rise buildings. It provides background on wind loads, describes the objectives of investigating parameters like fundamental time period and displacements under dynamic loads. It also outlines the methodology, including design wind load calculation according to Indian codes, modeling a 150m building as a case study, and analyzing it both statically and dynamically under along-wind and across-wind loads.
Comparative Analysis of an RC framed building under Seismic ConditionsIRJET Journal
This document presents a comparative analysis of different earthquake resisting techniques for a 10-story reinforced concrete building, including shear walls and bracings. Seven building models are analyzed using STAAD Pro software: 1) a base structure without seismic restraints, 2) parallel shear walls on all sides, 3) L-shaped corner shear walls, 4) diagonal bracing throughout, 5) diagonal bracing in the middle bays, 6) diagonal bracing at the corners, and 7) a combination of bracing and shear walls. The analysis finds that bracing is most effective at reducing bending moments, shear forces, and axial forces, while adding less weight than shear walls. Diagonal bracing placed in the middle bays
Effect of Impulsive Loads on G+3 RCC BuildingIJMERJOURNAL
This document analyzes the effect of impulsive loads on a G+3 reinforced concrete building modeled in STAAD Pro. Triangular, rectangular, and sinusoidal impulse loads of 100kN applied for 0.5 seconds were analyzed. It was found that:
1) The maximum deformations occurred on the front surface and roof of the building, with deformations decreasing along the height in a parabolic pattern.
2) Triangular impulses produced the largest deformations, followed by sinusoidal then rectangular impulses.
3) The building responded well to the impulses, but reinforcement should be increased to improve ductility under lateral loads. Higher grade concrete and over-reinforced beams and sl
Comparative Study of Irregular Shape BuildingsIRJET Journal
This document discusses a comparative study of irregularly shaped buildings and their behavior under seismic loads. It begins with an abstract that outlines how building irregularities can lead to failures during earthquakes. It then discusses modeling three reinforced concrete building frames with different types of vertical irregularities (at the side, center, or corner) in ETABS to analyze their time periods, displacements, drifts, and responses. The results show that the frame with an irregularity at the center experienced the least variation in its responses compared to the other frames. In conclusion, a frame with a vertical irregularity at the center represents the most cost-effective design for irregular buildings subjected to seismic loads.
Influence of Concrete and Steel Outrigger and Belt Truss in High Rise Moment ...IRJET Journal
1. The document analyzes 7 models of a 44-story reinforced concrete frame building with different outrigger and belt truss configurations to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing lateral displacement, storey drifts, base shear, and fundamental time periods under wind and earthquake loads.
2. Analysis found that a model with X-braced outriggers was most effective at reducing top storey displacement by 29.21% and maximum story drift by 26.64% compared to the bare frame model without outriggers. A model with a belt truss was also effective, reducing displacement by 34.57% and drift by 30.75%.
3. Steel outriggers provided the least benefit, reducing displacement by only
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF SHEAR-WALL IN CASE OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING ...IRJET Journal
The document analyzes and optimizes the design of shear walls in a high-rise building using ETABS software. It discusses modeling a 10-story building in ETABS with and without shear walls, and making design adjustments to the shear wall configuration. Results for story displacement and drift are compared between the models. The optimized model with design adjustments to the shear wall configuration showed reductions in story displacement and drift compared to the initial model without shear walls.
Analysis of Wind Load Effects on R.C Structure Resting on Flat and Sloping Gr...IRJET Journal
This document analyzes the effects of wind loads on reinforced concrete structures resting on flat and sloping ground using ETABS software. 36 models are created to analyze structures of varying heights (G+5, G+10, G+15) in different wind zones (3, 4, 5) on slopes of 0, 10, 20, and 30 degrees. Results for story displacement, drift, mode period are checked and compared to code requirements and manual calculations. The analysis aims to evaluate wind load distribution, compare effects of flat and sloping ground, study structural behavior, assess stability, optimize design, and validate design codes to improve structural design and resistance to wind loads.
IRJET-Effective Location Of Shear Walls and Bracings for Multistoried BuildingIRJET Journal
This document analyzes the effectiveness of different structural configurations for resisting lateral loads in a 10-story building subject to seismic activity. Two structural models are considered: a normal building frame and a dual system with shear walls and bracings placed at the building corners. Both models are analyzed using time history analysis in STAAD-Pro. Results show that the dual system experiences significantly less lateral deflection, with displacements reduced by 86-89% compared to the normal frame building. Additionally, the dual system sees only minor reductions in maximum shear force and bending moment compared to the normal frame building. Therefore, the dual system with corner shear walls and bracings provides greatly enhanced seismic performance over a normal framed building.
Similar to Performance of High-Rise Steel Building With and Without Bracings (20)
Adaptive synchronous sliding control for a robot manipulator based on neural ...IJECEIAES
Robot manipulators have become important equipment in production lines, medical fields, and transportation. Improving the quality of trajectory tracking for
robot hands is always an attractive topic in the research community. This is a
challenging problem because robot manipulators are complex nonlinear systems
and are often subject to fluctuations in loads and external disturbances. This
article proposes an adaptive synchronous sliding control scheme to improve trajectory tracking performance for a robot manipulator. The proposed controller
ensures that the positions of the joints track the desired trajectory, synchronize
the errors, and significantly reduces chattering. First, the synchronous tracking
errors and synchronous sliding surfaces are presented. Second, the synchronous
tracking error dynamics are determined. Third, a robust adaptive control law is
designed,the unknown components of the model are estimated online by the neural network, and the parameters of the switching elements are selected by fuzzy
logic. The built algorithm ensures that the tracking and approximation errors
are ultimately uniformly bounded (UUB). Finally, the effectiveness of the constructed algorithm is demonstrated through simulation and experimental results.
Simulation and experimental results show that the proposed controller is effective with small synchronous tracking errors, and the chattering phenomenon is
significantly reduced.
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024)ClaraZara1
6th International Conference on Machine Learning & Applications (CMLA 2024) will provide an excellent international forum for sharing knowledge and results in theory, methodology and applications of on Machine Learning & Applications.
Introduction- e - waste – definition - sources of e-waste– hazardous substances in e-waste - effects of e-waste on environment and human health- need for e-waste management– e-waste handling rules - waste minimization techniques for managing e-waste – recycling of e-waste - disposal treatment methods of e- waste – mechanism of extraction of precious metal from leaching solution-global Scenario of E-waste – E-waste in India- case studies.
Low power architecture of logic gates using adiabatic techniquesnooriasukmaningtyas
The growing significance of portable systems to limit power consumption in ultra-large-scale-integration chips of very high density, has recently led to rapid and inventive progresses in low-power design. The most effective technique is adiabatic logic circuit design in energy-efficient hardware. This paper presents two adiabatic approaches for the design of low power circuits, modified positive feedback adiabatic logic (modified PFAL) and the other is direct current diode based positive feedback adiabatic logic (DC-DB PFAL). Logic gates are the preliminary components in any digital circuit design. By improving the performance of basic gates, one can improvise the whole system performance. In this paper proposed circuit design of the low power architecture of OR/NOR, AND/NAND, and XOR/XNOR gates are presented using the said approaches and their results are analyzed for powerdissipation, delay, power-delay-product and rise time and compared with the other adiabatic techniques along with the conventional complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) designs reported in the literature. It has been found that the designs with DC-DB PFAL technique outperform with the percentage improvement of 65% for NOR gate and 7% for NAND gate and 34% for XNOR gate over the modified PFAL techniques at 10 MHz respectively.
Using recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) for pavements is crucial to achieving sustainability. Implementing RCA for new pavement can minimize carbon footprint, conserve natural resources, reduce harmful emissions, and lower life cycle costs. Compared to natural aggregate (NA), RCA pavement has fewer comprehensive studies and sustainability assessments.
DEEP LEARNING FOR SMART GRID INTRUSION DETECTION: A HYBRID CNN-LSTM-BASED MODELgerogepatton
As digital technology becomes more deeply embedded in power systems, protecting the communication
networks of Smart Grids (SG) has emerged as a critical concern. Distributed Network Protocol 3 (DNP3)
represents a multi-tiered application layer protocol extensively utilized in Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA)-based smart grids to facilitate real-time data gathering and control functionalities.
Robust Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are necessary for early threat detection and mitigation because
of the interconnection of these networks, which makes them vulnerable to a variety of cyberattacks. To
solve this issue, this paper develops a hybrid Deep Learning (DL) model specifically designed for intrusion
detection in smart grids. The proposed approach is a combination of the Convolutional Neural Network
(CNN) and the Long-Short-Term Memory algorithms (LSTM). We employed a recent intrusion detection
dataset (DNP3), which focuses on unauthorized commands and Denial of Service (DoS) cyberattacks, to
train and test our model. The results of our experiments show that our CNN-LSTM method is much better
at finding smart grid intrusions than other deep learning algorithms used for classification. In addition,
our proposed approach improves accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, achieving a high detection
accuracy rate of 99.50%.
Performance of High-Rise Steel Building With and Without Bracings
1. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 103 | P a g e
Performance of High-Rise Steel Building With and Without
Bracings
G.Hymavathi, B. Kranthi Kumar, N.Vidya Sagar Lal
1
P.G. Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Gokul institute of technology, piridi, bobbili, viziana garam,
Andhra Pradesh, India
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sistam college,ampolu road ,srikakulam,Andhra
Pradesh, India ,
3
Assistant professor, department of civil engineering, gokul institute of technology, piridi, bobbili,
vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Abstract A comparative study on performance of high-rise steel building with and without bracings, carried
out on a residential building by considering the gravity loads and lateral loads in the form of Earth quake loads
and Wind loads incorporating the Bracings to reduce lateral loads on structural elements. In this study, a 20
storey steel frame structure has been selected to be idealized as multi storey steel building model. The model is
analyzed by using STAAD.Pro 2008 structural analysis software with the consideration of wind and earthquake
loads. At the same time the influence of X-bracing pattern has been investigated.The building proposed in
designed by Limit State Method according to steel code IS: 800-2007, the Wind load analysis according to IS:
875-(part-3)1987 and seismic/Earth quake loads according to IS: 1893 (Part-1)-2002. In this study the node
displacements of buildings having with and without bracings of wind and earthquake effect of Zone II and
Zone V, and the axial force of the members of the buildings having with and without bracings of wind and
earthquake effect of Zone II and Zone V.
Keywords: Wind load, Displacement, Axial force, Bracings.
I. INTRODUCTION
The tallness of a building is relative and cannot be
defined in absolute terms either in relation to height
or the number of stories. But, from a structural
engineer's point of view the tall building or multi-
storeyed building can be defined as one that, by
virtue of its height, is affected by lateral forces due
to wind or earthquake or both to an extent that they
play an important role in the structural design.
Buildings and structures are considered stable with
lateral supports by using either bracing systems or
shear system or both such as wall to ensure the
stability of the building. Moreover, the important
thing to consider are the software to be used for the
analysis of tall building structure and wind speed at
construction area to avoid any problems in future.
One of the problems is affected from wind load.
Wind creates inward and outward pressures acting on
building surfaces, depending on the orientation of the
surface such as flat. This pressure increases uplift on
parts of the building, forcing the building apart if it is
too weak to resist the wind loads. Therefore, the most
important thing to overcome this problem is the
connection between beam and column in a frame such
as rigid or pin ended should be considered for a
realistic design it will become instable structure
which means loss of some situation and come close to
a failure such as buckling and sway if the structure
cannot sustain for a certain load whether from dead
load, imposed load, wind load and also natural
phenomena like earthquake.
II. LITRATURE REVIEW
Previous Studies
Suresh P, Panduranga Rao B, kalyana Rama J.S,
presented a Structures are classified as rigid and
flexible. The present investigation deals with the
calculation of wind loads using static and gust factor
method for a sixteen storey high rise building and
results are compared with respect to drift. Structure is
analyzed in STAAD Pro, with wind loads calculated
by gust factor as per IS 875-Part III with and without
X- bracings at all the four corners from bottom to top.
Present Study
In the present problem the 20 storey building
with steel elements as columns and beams, those
building outside panels are provided with X -
bracings and the interior panels of the building are
without bracings are modeled of this problem. The
model is prepared using STAAD Pro analysis
software. All features like dead load, live load, wind
load and seismic load. The loads on various structural
components like vertical, horizontal and inclined
members are evaluated and the members are designed
as per the IS specifications. In Chapter 5 prescribed
the node displacements of buildings having with and
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS
2. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 104 | P a g e
without bracings of earthquake effect of Zone II and
Zone V.
Braced Frames
Application on braced frames is typically used in
which the beam and column are designed resist
vertical loads only . Horizontal loads are resisted by
bracing element to achieve lateral stability of the
structures. The braced framing system able to achieve
material savings with respect to moment resisting
frame and control of frame drift due to lateral forces.
Wind bracing system can be installed as longitudinal
bracing or transverse bracing. A building also can be
designed for combination of both longitudinal and
transverse bracing. There are two types of braced
frames which are concentrically braced frames and
eccentrically braced frames
Concentrically braced frames (CBF)
Factors affecting the inelastic cyclic response of a
concentrically braced frame including the following
The slenderness and compactness of the
bracing member.
The relative axial strength of the brace in
compression and tension.
The strength of the brace connections to the
beam and columns.
The degree of lateral restraint provided to the
brace to beam connection.
The stiffness, strength, and compactness of
the beam into which the brace frames.
Design of Wind Pressure:
The design wind pressure at any height above
mean ground level shall be obtained by the following
relationship between wind pressure and wind
velocity:
Pz = 0.6 Vz2
Where Pz is design wind pressure in N/m2
at height
z, and Vz is design wind velocity in m/s at height z,
Design of wind speed (Vz)
The basic wind speed (Vb) for any site shall be
obtained from below figure and shall be modified to
include the following effects to get design wind
velocity at any height (Vz) for the chosen structure.
a. Risk level;
b. Terrain roughness height and size of
structure; and
c. Local topography
It can be mathematically expressed as follows;
Vz = Vh x K1 x K2 x K3
Where Vz = design wind speed at any height z in
m/s;
K1 is Probability factor (risk coefficient)
K2 is terrain, height and structure size factor
K3 is topography factor
Note: design wind speed up to 10m height from mean
ground level shall be considered constant
Design Approach for Braced frames
A braced frame is one in which resistance to
lateral force and frame instability is provided by a
specially designed bracing system. The bracing
system in a building frame is designed to serve the
following important functions.
Resisting lateral loads
Counteraction the over turning moment (p-∆
moment ) due to gravity loads
Preventing Frame buckling and
Improving sway behavior.
Earthquake Zone Intensity
Zone 5
Zone 5 covers the areas with the highest risks
zone that suffers earthquakes of intensity MSK
IX or greater. The IS code assigns zone factor of
0.36 for Zone 5.
Zone 4
This zone is called the High Damage Risk Zone
and covers areas liable to MSK VIII. The IS code
assigns zone factor of 0.24 for Zone 4.
Zone 3
This zone is classified as Moderate Damage Risk
Zone which is liable to MSK VII. and also 7.8 The IS
code assigns zone factor of 0.16 for Zone 3.
Zone 2
This region is liable to MSK VI or less and is
classified as the Low Damage Risk Zone. The IS code
assigns zone factor of 0.10 for Zone 2.
Load Calculations
Loads and load combinations are given as per
Indian standards. (IS 875:1984, IS 1893:2002 and IS
800:2007)
Gravity Loading
Floor load and Dead loads are calculated as
per general considerations as per IS 875 part1.
(ref Appendix 3&4)
Live load – 2.5kN/m2
Wind Loading
Static wind load is given as per IS 875-Part
3. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 105 | P a g e
III According to IS CODE (875 PART 3),
Vz = Vb×K1×K2×K3
Pz is Design wind pressure at a height z meter.
Pz =0.6Vz
2
The following assumptions are taken for the wind
load calculation
Location – Visakhapatnam
Wind speed – 50m/s (ref Appendix 5)
Terrain category – 3 and Class – C
K1 – 1.08 (life- 100 years)
K2 – depending upon the variation of height
K3 – 1.00 (flat topography)
Dynamic wind load also calculated by using gust
factor approach
ANALYSIS FOR G+20 BUILDING:
Along X – Direction:
Regional wind speed (Vb) = 50 m/sec
Risk coefficient factor (K1) = 1.08 (ref. sec
3.3.3)
Topography factor (K3) = 1 (ref. sec 3.3.3)
Design wind speed (Vz) = k1*k2*k3*Vb = 54*k2
Width of the building along wind (a)=X(a) = 48 m
Width of the building normal wind(b)=Y(b)=44 m
Height (h) above G.L = 77 m
a/b = 1.09
h/b = 1.75
Cf = 1.2 (ref fig.2 in Appendix)
For Wind force at level 10 m for G+20 building at
node 1 along X-direction is
Area (A)= 3.5 m2
Pressure (Pz)= 0.6 Vz2
= 0.6 X 50 K2
= 0.6 X 50 X 0.99
= 1.72 kN/m2
Wind Force (F)=A* Cf* Pz= 3.5x1.2x1.72
= 7.22 kN
Seismic loading: - Seismic load is given as
per IS 1893- 2002. Following assumptions are used
for the calculation.
Zone factor – 0.1 (Zone-2)
– 0.36(Zone-5)
Importance Factor – 1.5
Soil type – 2 (medium Soil)
Structure type –Steel Frame Building
Damping co-efficient – 5%
Response reduction – 4 (for concentric brace)
5 (for eccentric brace)
5(Special Moment
Resisting Frame (SMRF)
4. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 106 | P a g e
NODAL DISPLACEMENTS IN WITHOUT AND
WITH BRACINGS
Zone ii variation of node displacements and
heights for external column in x- direction
(without and with bracings wind load)
Nodal Displacements
Loading (Dead + Live + wind)
Node Height
Without
Bracings
With
Bracings
No. (m) (mm) (mm)
0008 0.0 0.000 0.000
1008 3.5 104.859 92.817
2008 7.0 146.242 126.187
3008 10.5 182.294 153.600
4008 14.0 219.413 180.078
5008 17.5 273.626 219.513
6008 21.0 330.023 259.413
7008 24.5 383.237 296.570
8008 28.0 433.070 331.108
9008 31.5 479.705 363.294
10008 35.0 523.029 393.155
11008 38.5 563.214 420.894
12008 42.0 600.418 446.705
13008 45.5 634.772 470.74
14008 49.0 666.384 493.124
15008 52.5 695.327 513.916
16008 56.0 721.339 532.915
17008 59.5 744.476 550.144
18008 63.0 764.816 565.653
19008 66.5 782.442 579.466
20008 70.0 797.460 591.566
21008 73.5 809.922 601.938
22008 77.0 820.552 -610.212
Zone ii variation of node displacements and heights
for interior column in x- direction (without and with
bracings wind load
Nodal Displacements
Loading (Dead + Live + wind)
Node Height
Without
Bracings
With
Bracings
No. (m) (mm) (mm)
0008 0.0 0.000 0.000
1008 3.5 104.859 92.817
2008 7.0 146.242 126.187
3008 10.5 182.294 153.600
4008 14.0 219.413 180.078
5008 17.5 273.626 219.513
6008 21.0 330.023 259.413
7008 24.5 383.237 296.570
8008 28.0 433.070 331.108
9008 31.5 479.705 363.294
10008 35.0 523.029 393.155
11008 38.5 563.214 420.894
12008 42.0 600.418 446.705
13008 45.5 634.772 470.74
14008 49.0 666.384 493.124
15008 52.5 695.327 513.916
16008 56.0 721.339 532.915
17008 59.5 744.476 550.144
18008 63.0 764.816 565.653
19008 66.5 782.442 579.466
20008 70.0 797.460 591.566
21008 73.5 809.922 601.938
22008 77.0 820.552 -610.212
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 500 1000
NODE DISPLACEMENTS (mm)
Figure 5.1.1 ZONE II VARIATION OF
NODE DISPLACEMENTS IN
EXTERNAL COLUMN WITH AND
WITHOUT WIND LOAD
D+L+W X
(mm)
D+L+W X B
(mm)
5. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 107 | P a g e
PERFORMANCE OF WIND EFFECT
BUILDING ON NODAL DISPLACEMENTS IN
FIGURES
the wind effect that nodal displacements in the
exterior columns in X-direction braced structure and
un braced structure are almost same up to 14 m
height, from this point the braced structure nodal
displacement is varied, the un braced structure the
displacement is more compared with braced structure
at top of building 25.52% and peak displacement at
56m height of building noted. No significant variation
in interior column also.
Zone ii and zone v variation of node displacements
and heights for external column in x- direction
(without bracings)
Nodal Displacements
Loading (Dead + Live + EQ)
Node Height
Without
Bracings
Zone II
Without
Bracings
Zone V
No. (m) (mm) (mm)
0008 0.0 0.000 0.000
1008 3.5 1.029 3.853
2008 7.0 1.589 5.540
3008 10.5 2.006 6.983
4008 14.0 2.370 8.376
5008 17.5 2.583 9.731
6008 21.0 3.106 11.438
7008 24.5 3.654 13.167
8008 28.0 4.202 14.887
9008 31.5 4.747 16.591
10008 35.0 5.286 18.270
11008 38.5 5.816 19.917
12008 42.0 6.338 21.523
13008 45.5 6.848 23.081
14008 49.0 7.346 24.581
15008 52.5 7.834 26.017
16008 56.0 8.314 27.384
17008 59.5 8.791 28.677
18008 63.0 9.276 29.899
19008 66.5 9.786 31.057
20008 70.0 10.359 32.180
21008 73.5 10.973 33.236
22008 77.0 12.114 34.709
Zone ii and zone v variation of node displacements
and heights for internal column in x- direction
(without bracings)
Nodal Displacements
Loading (Dead + Live + EQ)
Node Height
Without
Bracings
Zone II
Without
Bracings
Zone V
No. (m) (mm) (mm)
0008 0.0 0.000 0.000
1008 3.5 1.029 3.853
2008 7.0 1.589 5.540
3008 10.5 2.006 6.983
4008 14.0 2.370 8.376
5008 17.5 2.583 9.731
6008 21.0 3.106 11.438
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 500 1000
HEIGHT(m)
NODE DISPLACEMENTS (mm)
ZONE II VARIATION OF NODE
DISPLACEMENTS IN INTERNAL
COLOUMN WITH AND WITHOUT
WIND LOAD
D+L+W X
(mm)
D+L+W X B
(mm)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 20 40
HEIGHT(m)
NODE DISPLACEMENTS (mm)
ZONE II & ZONE V
VARATION OF NODE
DISPLACEMENTS
EXTERNAL COLUMN WITH
OUT BRACINGS IN EQ LOAD
D+L+E
Z2 X
(mm)
D+L+E
Z5 X
(mm)
6. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 108 | P a g e
7008 24.5 3.654 13.167
8008 28.0 4.202 14.887
9008 31.5 4.747 16.591
10008 35.0 5.286 18.270
11008 38.5 5.816 19.917
12008 42.0 6.338 21.523
13008 45.5 6.848 23.081
14008 49.0 7.346 24.581
15008 52.5 7.834 26.017
16008 56.0 8.314 27.384
17008 59.5 8.791 28.677
18008 63.0 9.276 29.899
19008 66.5 9.786 31.057
20008 70.0 10.359 32.180
21008 73.5 10.973 33.236
22008 77.0 12.114 34.709
PERFORMANCE OF EQ EFFECT BUILDING
ON NODAL DISPLACEMENTS IN WITHOUT
BRACING FIGURES
The Earth quake effect that nodal
displacements in the exterior columns in X-direction
un braced structure are Zone II is low when compared
with Zone V. The variation is linearly from bottom
to top level for both earth quake zones, at the bottom
and top variation is 73.29% and 65% and for both
conditions the peak variation is at 21m height.
The Earth quake effect that nodal displacements in
the interior columns in X-direction un braced
structure are Zone II is low when compared with
Zone V. The variation is linearly from bottom to top
level for both earth quake zones at the bottom and top
variation is 71.52% and 65.91% and for both
conditions the peak variation is at 21m height
Zone ii and zone v variation of node displacements
and heights for external column in x- direction (with
bracings)
Nodal Displacements
Loading (Dead + Live + EQ)
Node Height
Without
Bracings
Zone II
Without
Bracings
Zone V
No. (m) (mm) (mm)
0008 0.0 0.000 0.000
1008 3.5 1.029 3.853
2008 7.0 1.589 5.540
3008 10.5 2.006 6.983
4008 14.0 2.370 8.376
5008 17.5 2.583 9.731
6008 21.0 3.106 11.438
7008 24.5 3.654 13.167
8008 28.0 4.202 14.887
9008 31.5 4.747 16.591
10008 35.0 5.286 18.270
11008 38.5 5.816 19.917
12008 42.0 6.338 21.523
13008 45.5 6.848 23.081
14008 49.0 7.346 24.581
15008 52.5 7.834 26.017
16008 56.0 8.314 27.384
17008 59.5 8.791 28.677
18008 63.0 9.276 29.899
19008 66.5 9.786 31.057
20008 70.0 10.359 32.180
21008 73.5 10.973 33.236
22008 77.0 12.114 34.709
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 20 40
HEIGHT(m)
NODE DISPLACEMENTS (mm)
ZONE II & ZONE V
VARATION OF NODE
DISPLACEMENTS
INTERNAL COLUMN
WITHOUT BRACINGS IN EQ
LOAD
D+L+E
X Z2
(mm)
D+L+E
X Z5
(mm)
7. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 109 | P a g e
Zone ii and zone v variation of node displacements
and heights for internal column in x- direction (with
bracings)
Nodal Displacements
Loading (Dead + Live + EQ)
Node Height With
Bracings
Zone II
With
Bracings
Zone V
No. (m) (mm) (mm)
62 0.0 0.000 0.000
1062 3.5 0.862 2.679
2062 7.0 1.219 3.697
3062 10.5 1.507 4.549
4062 14.0 1.695 5.291
5062 17.5 1.118 5.338
6062 21.0 0.980 5.849
7062 24.5 1.007 6.523
8062 28.0 1.171 7.330
9062 31.5 1.442 8.239
10062 35.0 1.798 9.228
11062 38.5 2.228 10.283
12062 42.0 2.724 11.391
13062 45.5 3.281 12.547
14062 49.0 3.901 13.746
15062 52.5 4.588 14.989
16062 56.0 5.350 16.279
17062 59.5 6.204 17.627
18062 63.0 7.172 19.049
19062 66.5 8.291 20.574
20062 70.0 9.613 22.243
21062 73.5 11.262 24.170
22062 77.0 13.072 26.171
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 20 40
HEIGHT(m)
NODE DISPLACEMENTS (mm)
ZONE II & ZONE V
VARATION OF NODE
DISPLACEMENTS
EXTERNAL COLUMN WITH
BRACINGS IN EQ LOAD
D+L+E Z2
X B (mm)
D+L+E Z5
X B (mm)
8. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 110 | P a g e
PERFORMANCE OF EQ EFFECT BUILDING
ON NODAL DISPLACEMENTS IN WITH
BRACING FIGURES
The Earth quake effect that node displacements in the
exterior columns in X-direction braced structure are
Zone II is low when compared with Zone V. The
variation is parabolic from bottom to top level, at
bottom and top variation is 70.83% and 65.91% and
for both conditions the peak variation is at 24.5m
height.
The Earth quake effect that node displacements in the
interior columns in X-direction braced structure are
Zone II is low when compared with Zone V. The
variation is parabolic from bottom to top level, at
bottom and top variation is 67.80% and 50.05% and
for both conditions the peak variation is at 24.5m
height.
PERFORMANCE OF EQ EFFECT BUILDING
ON AXIAL FORCE IN FIGURES
Zone II the earth quake effect that Axial Force
the exterior and interior columns in X-direction
braced structure and un braced structure is varied
from bottom to top level .The un braced structure
axial force is more compared with braced structure.
The exterior column axial force at top of building
5.96% and bottom of building 14.84% and peak axial
force at 24.5m height of building noted and the
interior column axial force at top to bottom level of
building almost same and peak axial force at 38.5m
height of building noted.
Zone V the earth quake effect that Axial Force the
exterior and interior columns in X-direction braced
structure and un braced structure is varied from
bottom to top level .The un braced structure axial
force is more compared with braced structure. The
exterior column axial force at top of building 5.89%
and bottom of building 14.96% and peak axial force
at 3.5m height of building noted and the interior
column axial force at top to bottom level of building
almost same and peak axial force at 28m height of
building noted.
Zone ii and zone v variation of axial force and heights
for external column in x- direction (with out bracings)
Axial Force
Loading (Dead + Live + EQ)
Beam Height
Without
Bracings
With
Bracings
No. (m) (KN) (KN)
39061 3.5 2540.000 2160.000
40061 7.0 2420.000 2080.000
41061 10.5 2310.000 1990.000
42061 14.0 2190.000 1900.000
43061 17.5 2080.000 1800.000
44061 21.0 1970.000 1710.000
45061 24.5 1850.000 1610.000
46061 28.0 1740.000 1520.000
47061 31.5 1620.000 1420.000
48061 35.0 1510.000 1330.000
49061 38.5 1390.000 1230.000
50061 42.0 1270.000 1130.000
60061 45.5 1160.000 1030.000
70061 49.0 1040.000 926.330
80061 52.5 927.060 824.230
90061 56.0 811.060 721.540
100061 59.5 694.910 618.430
110061 63.0 578.610 515.170
120061 66.5 462.170 412.170
130061 70.0 345.600 310.000
140061 73.5 229.070 209.230
150061 77.0 111.670 105.084
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 20 40
HEIGHT(m)
NODE DISPLACEMENTS (mm)
ZONE II & ZONE V
VARATION OF NODE
DISPLACEMENTS
INTERNAL COLUMN WITH
BRACINGS IN EQ LOAD
D+L+E Z2
X B (mm)
D+L+E Z5
X B (mm)
9. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 111 | P a g e
Zone ii and zone v variation of axial force and heights
for internal column in x- direction (with out bracings)
Axial Force
Loading (Dead + Live + EQ)
Beam Height
Without
Bracings
With
Bracings
No. (m) (KN) (KN)
39061 3.5 2540.000 2160.000
40061 7.0 2420.000 2080.000
41061 10.5 2310.000 1990.000
42061 14.0 2190.000 1900.000
43061 17.5 2080.000 1800.000
44061 21.0 1970.000 1710.000
45061 24.5 1850.000 1610.000
46061 28.0 1740.000 1520.000
47061 31.5 1620.000 1420.000
48061 35.0 1510.000 1330.000
49061 38.5 1390.000 1230.000
50061 42.0 1270.000 1130.000
60061 45.5 1160.000 1030.000
70061 49.0 1040.000 926.330
80061 52.5 927.060 824.230
90061 56.0 811.060 721.540
100061 59.5 694.910 618.430
110061 63.0 578.610 515.170
120061 66.5 462.170 412.170
130061 70.0 345.600 310.000
140061 73.5 229.070 209.230
150061 77.0 111.670 105.084
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 500 10001500200025003000
HEIGHT(m)
AXIAL LOAD (kN)
ZONE II & ZONE V
VARIATION OF AXIAL LOAD
WITHOUT BRACINGS IN EQ
LOAD
D+L+E
Z2 Fx (kN)
D+L+E
Z5 Fx (kN)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 2000 4000
HEIGHT(m)
AXIAL FORCE (kN)
ZONE II & ZONE V
VARIATION OF AXIAL
FORCE WITHOUT
BRACINGS IN EQ LOAD
D+L+E
Z2 Fx
(kN)
D+L+E
Z5 Fx
(kN)
10. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 112 | P a g e
Zone ii and zone v variation of axial force and heights
for external column in x- direction (with bracings)
Axial Force
Loading (Dead + Live + EQ)
Beam Height
Without
Bracings
With
Bracings
No. (m) (KN) (KN)
39061 3.5 2540.000 2160.000
40061 7.0 2420.000 2080.000
41061 10.5 2310.000 1990.000
42061 14.0 2190.000 1900.000
43061 17.5 2080.000 1800.000
44061 21.0 1970.000 1710.000
45061 24.5 1850.000 1610.000
46061 28.0 1740.000 1520.000
47061 31.5 1620.000 1420.000
48061 35.0 1510.000 1330.000
49061 38.5 1390.000 1230.000
50061 42.0 1270.000 1130.000
60061 45.5 1160.000 1030.000
70061 49.0 1040.000 926.330
80061 52.5 927.060 824.230
90061 56.0 811.060 721.540
100061 59.5 694.910 618.430
110061 63.0 578.610 515.170
120061 66.5 462.170 412.170
130061 70.0 345.600 310.000
140061 73.5 229.070 209.230
150061 77.0 111.670 105.084
Zone ii and zone variation of axial force and heights
for internal column in x- direction (with bracings
Axial Force
Loading (Dead + Live + EQ)
Beam Height
Without
Bracings
Zone II
Without
Bracings
Zone V
No. (m) (KN) (KN)
39065 3.5 3400.000 3400.000
40065 7.0 3200.000 3200.000
41065 10.5 3010.000 3010.000
42065 14.0 2820.000 2820.000
43065 17.5 2640.000 2640.000
44065 21.0 2470.000 2470.000
45065 24.5 2300.000 2300.000
46065 28.0 2140.000 2140.000
47065 31.5 1990.000 1990.000
48065 35.0 1830.000 1830.000
49065 38.5 1680.000 1680.000
50065 42.0 1540.000 1540.000
60065 45.5 1390.000 1390.000
70065 49.0 1250.000 1250.000
80065 52.5 1110.000 1110.000
90065 56.0 966.245 966.380
100065 59.5 827.743 827.890
110065 63.0 690.345 690.500
12065 66.5 553.898 554.060
13065 70.0 418.319 418.480
14065 73.5 283.338 283.480
15065 77.0 151.023 151.210
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 1000 2000 3000
HEIGHT(m)
AXIAL FORCE (kN)
ZONE II & ZONE V VARATION
OF AXIAL FORCE WITH
BRACINGS IN EQ LOAD
D+L+E Z2
Fx B (kN)
D+L+E Z5
Fx B (kN)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 2000 4000
HEIGHT(m)
AXIAL FORCE (kN)
ZONE II & ZONE V
VARIATION OF AXIAL
FORCE WITH BRACINGS IN
EQ LOAD
D+L+E Z2
Fx (kN)
D+L+E Z5
Fx (kN)
11. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 113 | P a g e
PERFORMANCE OF EQ EFFECT BUILDING
ON AXIAL FORCE IN FIGURES
The earth quake effect that Axial Force in the
exterior columns in un braced structure are Zone II
and Zone V are same. No significant variation is
found in the interior column.
The earth quake effect that Axial Force in the
exterior columns in braced structure are Zone II and
Zone V are same. No significant variation is found in
the interior column.
Conclusions of building on nodal displacements
Zone II the wind effect that nodal displacements
in the exterior columns in braced structure and un
braced structure nodal displacement is varied, the un
braced structure the displacement is more compared
with braced structure at top of building 25% No
significant variation in interior column also.
Zone II the earth quake effect that nodal
displacements in the exterior and interior columns in
braced structure and un braced structure nodal
displacement is increased gradually up to certain
height and then decreased gradually from top level. In
the un braced structure the displacement is more
compared with braced structure, at top of building
almost same braced and un braced structure.
Zone V the earth quake effect that nodal
displacements in the exterior and interior columns in
braced structure and un braced structure nodal
displacement is increased gradually from top level. In
the un braced structure the displacement is more
compared with braced structure, at top of building
varied 23% braced and un braced structure.
The Earth quake effect that nodal displacements
in the exterior and interior columns in braced and un
braced structure are Zone II is low when compared
with Zone V. The variation is linearly from bottom
to top level for both earth quake zones, at the bottom
to top maximum variation is 75% and for both.
Conclusions of building on axial force
The Wind effect that Axial Force the exterior
columns in braced structure are low when
compared with un braced structure, from top floor
both are same. No significant variation is found in the
interior column.
Zone II and Zone V earth quake effect that axial
force the exterior columns in braced structure are
low when compared with un braced structure, from
top floor both are same. In the interior columns
almost same in braced and un braced structures
The variation of Zone II and Zone V the earth
quake effect that Axial Force in the exterior columns
in braced and un braced structure are same. No
significant variation is found in the interior column.
Discussions
In high rise buildings the stability can be achieved
by suitably adding the dimensions of the external
columns with diagonal X-bracings. Provision of X-
bracings reduces the amount of displacements in
structure.
In case of any reasons Zone provision will be
changed the bracings can also be used as a retrofitting
technique to strengthen the existing structure as X-
bracings will act more like shear wall.
The braced building of the storey displacement
decreases as compared to the un braced building
which indicates that the overall response of the
building decreases.
The displacement of the building decreases depending
upon the different bracing system employed and the
bracing sizes, about the whole of performance of X
braced building better than the other braced building.
Scope for Further Work
The present work is an approach to carry out
initial study the response of very large complicated
tall structures. The work may be extended to aspects
like condition monitoring of these structures due to
moments and time period of earth quake motions. The
following challenging case studies can be taken up
with recent developments in finite element analysis
and sap software.
References
[1.] Alasdair N.Beal (2006). Columns, sway frames
and BS 5950-1:2000. Structural Engineer.
Volume (84) : page 40-42
[2.] B. Dean Kumar, B. L. P. Swami, Y. Balakoti
Reddy, (2011), Appropriate Design Wind
Speeds for Structures, International Journal of
Earth Sciences and Engineering, 4(6), pp 504-
507 .
[3.] B.S. Krishnamachar, and D. Ajitha Simha
(1978). Design of Steel Structures. New Delhi:
Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd.
[4.] Bungale S. Taranath , Wind and
Earthquake resistant buildings: Structural
analysis a and design, CRC press, 2nd edition
May 2012.
[5.] Bush T. D., Jones E. A. and Jirsa J. O.,
“Behavior of RC frame strengthened using
structural steel bracing”, Journal of Structural
Engineering, Vol. 117, No.4, April, 1991
[6.] Chen, X. and Kareem, A, (2004),
Equivalent static wind loads on buildings:
New model, Journal of Structural Engineering,
ASCE, 130(10), pp 1425-1435.
[7.] Davenport, A. G., (1993), Gust loading factors,
Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 93,
pp 11–34.
[8.] Dennis Lam, Thien-Cheong Ang and Sing-
Ping Chiew (2004). Structural Steel Work-
Design to Limit State Theory. 3rd edition.
Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
[9.] Desai J. P., Jain A. K. and Arya A. S.,
“Seismic response of R. C. braced frames”,
12. G.Hymavathi et al. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 11, (Part - 4) November 2015, pp.103-114
www.ijera.com 114 | P a g e
Computers and Structures Volume 29 No.4, pp
557568,1988.
[10.] Fabio Minciarellia, Massimiliano Gioffrec,
Mircea Grigoriud, Emil Simiub, (2001),
Estimates of extreme wind effects and wind
load factors: influence of knowledge
uncertainties, Probabilistic Engineering
Mechanics, 16(4), pp 331-340.
[11.] Ferraioli, M., Avossa, A.M., Malangone P.,
“Performancebased assessment of R.C.
buildings strengthened with steel braces”,
Proceedings of the 2 nd International Congress
Naples, Italy, 2006.
[12.] Ghaffarzadeh H. and Maheri M.R., “Cyclic
tests on the internally braced RC frames”,
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Shiraz University,
Shiraz, Iran, 2006.