Mobile IPv4 and Mobile IPv6 were simulated in NS2 to compare their performance. Packet drop and throughput were used as metrics. For TCP traffic over 200 seconds: MIPv4 had 3 dropped packets while MIPv6 had none. MIPv4 throughput was 13.12Mbps receiving, while MIPv6 was unlimited at 2.14Gbps receiving. In conclusion, MIPv6 performed better than MIPv4 according to the simulation results.

1. Performance comparison of MIPv4 andPerformance comparison of MIPv4 and
MIPv6MIPv6
Presented by:
Md. Habibur Rahman (11-94853-2)
Course:
Mobile and Multimedia Network
Instructor:
Md. Manirul Islam

2.  Introduction
 Mobile IP
• MIPv4
• MIPv6
 Simulation Environment
 Performance Metrics
 Simulation Result
 Conclusion
AgendaAgenda

3. Foreign
Agent (FA)
Home Agent
(HA)
Corresponded
Node (CN)
Mobile Node
(MN)
Binding Update
Data Transmission
Home
Network
Foreign
Network
Mobile IPv4 (MIP)Mobile IPv4 (MIP)

4. Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)
Access
Router (AR)
Home Agent
(HA)
Corresponded
Node (CN)
Mobile Node
(MN)
Binding Update
Data Transmission
Home
Network
Foreign
Network

5.  MIPv4
• integrated in NS2
 MIPv6
• MobiWAN Patch (ns-allinone-2.33)
• Patch Link:
• http://www.nicta.com.au/people/mehanio/ns
misc
Implementation of MIPImplementation of MIP

6.  Network Simulator –NS2
 Simulation Area 1200X1200
 Simulation Time -200sec
 MAC/80211
 Channel type - Channel/Wireless channel
 Two Radio propagation model
 Data Packet - TCP
Simulation EnvironmentSimulation Environment

7. Simulation ParametersSimulation Parameters
Parameters Values
Simulation area 1200 X 1200
Mobile Host (MN) 1
Mobile IP MIPv4, MIPv6
Address Type Hierarchical
Traffic type TCP
Packet size 1040 bytes
Simulation time 200s
IEEE MAC Layer 802.11
Protocols DSDV
Network interface type Phy/wirelessphy

8. Simulation TopologySimulation Topology

11.  Drop
• Packet drop is equal to number of packets sent
from source minus number of packet received
in the path of destination i.e.
 Throughput
• Measurement of number of packets passing
through the network in a unit of time.
Performance MetricPerformance Metric

12. Packet Type
(Simulation
Time 200
Sec)
Mobile IP Total Sent
packets
Total
Received
packets
Total
dropped
packets
TCP MIPv4 1300 1297 3
Mipv6 29692 29692 0
Result AnalysisResult Analysis
Packet Type
(Simulation
Time 200 Sec)
Mobile IP Total Sending
Throughput
(kbps)
Total Receiving
Throughput
(kbps)
TCP MIPv4 131220000 129700000
Mipv6 2147483647 2147483647
Throughput Calculation
Packet Drop Calculation

13.  Simulate MIPv4 and MIPv6 in NS2
 Performance compare by two metrics
 Require more performance analysis
 According to our discussion, MIPv6 performs
better than MIPv4
ConclusionConclusion

14. Thank you 