CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. SECTIONAL TENSIONS IN THE UNITED ST...George Dumitrache
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. SECTIONAL TENSIONS IN THE UNITED STATES. Slavery, economic and social differences, cultural differences, political issues, the revolution.
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 AND ITS BREA...George Dumitrache
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 AND ITS BREAKDOWN. Key issues, the compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act 1854, formation of the Republican Party.
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. SECTIONAL TENSIONS IN THE UNITED ST...George Dumitrache
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. SECTIONAL TENSIONS IN THE UNITED STATES. Slavery, economic and social differences, cultural differences, political issues, the revolution.
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 AND ITS BREA...George Dumitrache
CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: HISTORY OF THE USA. THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 AND ITS BREAKDOWN. Key issues, the compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act 1854, formation of the Republican Party.
The Gold Rush of 1858 passed through the region and Port Pemberton was established as a stopping house along the Douglas Trail. Over 30,000 gold rushers passed through the region making their way to the goldfields of Lillooet and beyond. Beyond the Gold Rush of 1858 there were other major events happening in Canada and in the world.
events leading up to the civil war. MO Compromise, Manifest Destiny, Mexican-American War, Compromise of 1850, Kansas-Nebraska Act, Dred Scott Case, John Brown's Raid on Harper's Ferry, Election of 1860.
Covers key events preceding the American Civil War, including the Compromise of 1850, the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act, the establishment of the underground railroad, the publication of "Uncle Tom's Cabin," and the drafting of the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
The Gold Rush of 1858 passed through the region and Port Pemberton was established as a stopping house along the Douglas Trail. Over 30,000 gold rushers passed through the region making their way to the goldfields of Lillooet and beyond. Beyond the Gold Rush of 1858 there were other major events happening in Canada and in the world.
events leading up to the civil war. MO Compromise, Manifest Destiny, Mexican-American War, Compromise of 1850, Kansas-Nebraska Act, Dred Scott Case, John Brown's Raid on Harper's Ferry, Election of 1860.
Covers key events preceding the American Civil War, including the Compromise of 1850, the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act, the establishment of the underground railroad, the publication of "Uncle Tom's Cabin," and the drafting of the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
Sorry for the wait. Hopefully u can use it to study 4 the AP test... anyways includes ::::::
ch. 17: South & Slavery Controversy 1793-1860
ch.18: Manifest Destiny & Legacy 1841-1840
ch.19:Renewing the Sectional struggle 1848-1854
ch.20: Drifting Towards Disunion-1854-1861
Option 1:
Option 2:
Introduction
As Module 6 showed, the Mexican-American War exposed a deep national divide over the role and future of slavery in the United States. The controversies that had been engendered by the war—Texas’ annexation, the Wilmot Proviso, and the Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo—only quickened during the 1850s. The cascade of events in the 1850s (by which we also include the election of 1860) led to the secession of the Lower Southern states and the start of the Civil War itself. During the first few months of war, both sides struggled to find strategies to force the other side to terms. This chapter addresses the events of the 1850s, the election of 1860 and its aftermath, secession, and the first few months of the Civil War.
1. The Compromise of 1850
While some may have felt that victory over Mexico cemented an American national identity, the impact of sectionalism was the decade’s constant refrain. Without committing overly to a sense of inevitability about the Civil War, it is easy to see how the Mexican-American War set in motion a series of events that resulted in war just barely a decade later.
As we discussed in the last module, the Wilmot Proviso, which failed to pass during several attempts, had stirred Southern paranoia that the North could not be trusted to maintain the free-slave state equilibrium. Likewise, Northerners may have celebrated American victory in the recent war, but criticized the strength of the Southern “slave power” in politics. One primary fear was that the “slave power” would open the western territories to slavery, thereby undercutting the “free labor” ideology and shutting out free-state settlers.
The issue of slavery in the new territories might have remained a backburner issue had it not been for the discovery of gold at Sutter’s Mill, California, in 1848. That event opened the way for a mass American migration west. The sheer number of migrants required the northwestern territories be organized and/or be put on the path to statehood. Likewise, Southerners wanted the southwest territories organized so slavery would be legally recognized. Southerners were aware that California would like come into the Union as a free state, so slave interests needed to be protected elsewhere.
The territorial issue, combined with other pressing section-related issues, convinced Congressional leaders to consider some “grand bargain” to resolve them. If compromises had been made in 1789 and 1820, why not in 1850? A package of bills was assembled and finally passed after furious debates over the first part of the year.
The final bills provided for:
· California to be admitted as a free state
· Texas to cede its New Mexico claims to the US and, in exchange, the US would assume much of its pre-admission debt
· The remaining territory from Mexico to be organized without specific mention of slave or free status
· The slave trade (but not slave ownership) to be abolished in the District of Columbia
· A streng.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.