OSTEOTOMIES AROUNDTHE
HIP
DR. SIDHARTH YADAV
JR 2 ORTHOPAEDICS
NKPSIMS
DEFINITION
 An osteotomy is a surgical
corrective procedure used to
obtain a correct biomechanical
alignment of the extremity so
as to achieve equivocal load
transmission, performed with
or without removal of a portion
of the bone
HISTORY
 First femoral osteotomy was performed by John-
Rhea, Barton in 1826 when tried to secure the
motion of ankyloid hip.
 1835 Sourvier performed first subtronchanteric
osteotomy for the treatment of CDH.
 1854 Langenback introduced sub-cutaneous
osteotomy of the femur.
 1918 and 19 Von Baeyer and Lorenz described
bifurcation operation of upper femoral osteotomy
to secure stability in old CDH.
HISTORY
 1922 Schanz reported his low sub-trochanteric
abduction osteotomy.
 1935 Pauwels described osteotomy at intertrochanteric
level adduction deformity.
 1936 McMurry performed oblique displacement
osteotomy for osteoarthritis of hip and non-union
fracture neck of femur.
 1955 Chiari did pelvic osteotomy for stable coverage of
head.
 Blount and Moore described excellent blade plate for
fixation of high sub-trochanteric osteotomy.
BIO MECHANICS
Fo rce s acro ss hip jo int
 Body Weight
 Ground reaction forces
 Abductor muscle forces
2 D STATIC ANALYSIS
 One legged stance
5/6 BODY
WEIGHT on
femoral head
 The force acting
on the lever arm is
thrice the body
weight.
 Osteotomies :
 Increases the contact area / congruency.
 Improves coverage of head.
 Moves normal articular cartilage into weight
bearing zone.
 Restore biomechanical advantage.
OSTEOTOMY AROUND HIP
 According to Anatomic Location
 Femoral Osteotomy
 High Cervical.
 Intertrochanteric Osteotomy.
 Subtrochanteric Osteotomy.
 Greater Trochanteric.
 Pelvic Osteotomy.
 Salvage Osteotomies : e g . Chiari, She lf.
 Reconstructive Osteotomies : e g . Pe riace tabular,
Sing le , Do uble , Triple Inno m inate .
Co ntd.
 Based on Indications
 To obtain stability
 old unreduced dislocations.
 Lorenz bifurcation osteotomy.
 Schanz low subtrochanteric.
 To obtain union
 fractures of femoral neck.
 McMurry’s osteotomy.
 Dickson's high geometric osteotomy.
 Schanz Angulation Osteotomy.
 unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
 Dimon Hughston Osteotomy.
 Sarmiento’s Osteotomy
 Relief of pain
 osteoarathritis.
 Pauwel’s type I varus osteotomy.
 Pauwel’s type II valgus osteotomy.
 To Correct deformities
 coxa vara
 slipped upper femoral epiphysis
 Intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy by dunn.
 Compensatory Basilar Osteotomy of Femoral
Neck.
 Extracapsular Base-of-Neck osteotomy.
 Ball-and-Socket Trochanteric Osteotomy.
 Pauwel’s osteotomy (Y).
Co ntd.Co ntd.
 Osteonecrosis of femoral head
Sugioka’s transtrochanteric osteotomy.
Varus deroation osteotomy of Axer.
 In paralytic disorders of hip.
Varus Osteotomy.
Rotational Osteotomy
 In congenital dislocation.
Co ntd.Co ntd.
CONTRAINDICATIONS OF
OSTEOTOMY
 NEUROPATHIC ARTHROPATHY
 INFLAMMATORY ARTHROPATHY
 ACTIVE INFECTIONS
 SEVERE OSTEOPENIA
 ADVANCED ARTHRITIS/ANKYLOSIS
 ADVANCED AGE
 SMOKING, OBESITY
Principles of Osteotomy
 Ostoeotomy can be viewed as either
 Reconstructive
 Salvage
 Femoral osteotomy to correct proximal femoral
abnormalities.
FactorsFactors Reconstructive OsteotomyReconstructive Osteotomy Salvage OsteotomySalvage Osteotomy
AgeAge Generally < 25 yearsGenerally < 25 years Generally < 50 yearsGenerally < 50 years
(Some biological Plasticity(Some biological Plasticity
Remains)Remains)
SymptomsSymptoms Minimal (Out Progressive)Minimal (Out Progressive) Moderate to SevereModerate to Severe
MotionMotion Near NormalNear Normal > 60> 6000
FlexionFlexion
FunctionFunction Near NormalNear Normal Fair to PoorFair to Poor
PthoanatomyPthoanatomy No Irreversible ChangesNo Irreversible Changes Irreversible ChangesIrreversible Changes
RoentgenograpRoentgenograp
hyhy
Congruent but MalalignedCongruent but Malaligned
SurfacesSurfaces
Cartilage narrowing orCartilage narrowing or
incongruity or bothincongruity or both
Prognosis ifPrognosis if
untreateduntreated
PoorPoor PoorPoor
DIFFERENCE
PAUWEL’S VARUS OSTEOTOMY
Varus intertrochanteric femoral osteotomies
are designed to elevate the greater
trochanter and move it laterally, while
moving the abductor and psoas muscles
medially, to :
 Restore joint congruity
 Decrease the force acting on the edge of the
acetabulum moves to the middle of weight
bearing surface.
INDICATIONS
 Antalgic abductor limb
 Abduction deformity
 Painful adduction
 Neck shaft angle > 135°
Oblique cut is
made parallel to
the chisel
inserted
Proximal fragment is
rotated in varus .
Wedge being
shifted to
lateral side.
FINAL RESULT
Insertion of
angled blade
plate
TYPES OF WEDGE IN VARUS OSTEOTOMY
DISADVANTAGES
 Shortens the limb to some degrees.
 Creates a trendelenberg gait.
 Increases the prominence of greater
trochanter.
 Overloading of the medial compartment of
knee.
PAUWELS VALGUS OSTEOTOMY
Valgus intertrochanteric femoral osteotomies transfer the center
of hip rotation medially from the superior aspect of the
acetabulum to decrease the weight bearing area of femoral
head .
 Normally 15° of correction is required.
INDICATIONS:
 Trendelenburg Limb
 Adduction deformity
 Motion in adduction beyond adduction deformity
 Painful abduction
CONTRAINDICATIONS:
 Flexion of less than 60°
 Knock knees as this will increase the deformity at knee.
 After insertion of guide wire & chisel 2cm proximal to
osteotomy site similar to explained before :-
Pelvic Osteotomies
 Reconstructive
 Salter 18m – 6y
 Pemberton 18m – 10y
 Steel skeletal maturity
 PAO (Ganz) skeletal maturity
 Salvage
 Chiari skeletal maturity
SALTER'S INNOMINATE OSTEOTOMY
 In this, the entire acetabulum together with pubis and
ischium is rotated as a unit.
INDICATIONS:
 CDH in children from 18 months to 9 years of age and in
congenital subluxation upto early adult life.
 Before the osteotomy, femoral head should be positioned
opposite the level of the acetabulum achieved by period of
traction.
 Contractures of iliopsoas and adductor muscles must be
released.
Osteotomy made from
AIIS to Greater Sciatic
notch
Graft is taken from iliac
crest and trained to the
shape of a wedge.
The distal segment is
shifted forward,
downward and outward
Place the graft into
open segment
anteriorly.
anteriorlyanteriorly
Secure it by passing a K-
wire from proximal
fragment through graft into
distal fragment taking care
not to enter acetabulum.
 Subluxation in DDH After SALTERS
osteotomy
ADVANTAGES:
 Relatively simple procedure.
 No change in acetabular configuration.
DISADVANTAGES:
 Relatively unstable needs internal fixation.
 Second surgery for pin removal.
 Possibility of joint penetration by pins.
PEMBERTON ACETABULOPLASTY
 This operation redirects the inclination of the
acetabular roof by an osteotomy of the ilium,
superior to the acetabulum followed by levering
of the roof inferiorly.
INDICATION:
 In dysplastic hips between the age of 1 year and
the age when the tri-radiate cartilage became too
inflexible to serve as a hinge (about 12 years in
girls and 14 years in boys).
First cut is made from the
outer cortex of the ilium,
starting just above the AIIS
and extending backwards till it
reaches
triradiate cartilage.
A similar cut is made in the
medial cortex directing it
posteriorly, parallel with the
previous one until it reaches
the triradiate cartilage.
With a wide curved
osteotome lever the distal
fragment distally until
anterior edges of two
fragments is at least 2-3cm
apart.
Resect a wedge of bone from
anterior part of ilium including
ASIS. Place the wedge of bone in
the groove made and drive the
wedge into place and impact it.
ADVANTAGES:
1. Osteotomy is incomplete, therefore more stable
2. Internal fixation is not required
3. Greater degree of correction can be achieved with
less rotation of the acetabulum.
DISADVANTAGES:
1. Technically more difficult
2. It alters the configuration and capacity of the
acetabulum and can result in an incongruence
relationship between it and femoral head.
Acetabular dysplasia after treatment of CDH with Pemberton
acetabuloplasty on Right side.
TRIPLE INNOMINATE OSTEOTOMY BY
STEEL
 INDICATIONS- :-
Adolescents & skeletally mature
adults with residual dysplasia &
subluxation in whom remodelling
of acetabulum is no longer
anticipated.
 ADVANTAGE –
Better coverage of femoral head by
articular cartilage , Better hip
joint stability, no need of spica
cast.
1
2
3
1.Osteotomy made from
AIIS to Greater Sciatic
notch
2. Ischial ramus is
divided posterolaterally
at 45° from
perpendicular.
3.Superior pubic ramus
is divided
posteromedially 15°
from perpendicular.
 DISADVANTAGES:
1. Difficult to perform.
2. Does not change the size of the acetabulum.
3. It distorts the pelvis so natural child birth is impossible
in adulthood.
MODIFIED BY LIPTON & BOWEN
1. Resecting 1-1.5 cm bone from ischial tuberosity to favor
medialization.
2. To resect a triangular wedge from outer part of ilium
which favors slot formation which serves as abutment.
3. Use 7.3mm cannulated screws instead of steinmann
pins.
SHELF OSTEOTOMY BY
STAHELI
 Have commonly been
performed to enlarge the
volume of the
acetabulum.
 The objective is to create a
shelf, the size of which is
decided by measuring the
“width of augmentation
(WA)” using the CE angle
of wiberg.
 Best to do after 5 years of
age.
 CE Angle is measured in standing AP
radiograph.
 After packing the graft the rectus femoris is sutured
for stability of the graft .
 Postoperative: hip spica can be applied in 15 deg of
abduction and 20° of flexion.
Pre operative post op
 CONTRA-INDICATIONS:
1. DDH with spherical congruity suited for
re-directional osteotomy.
2. Hips requiring concurrent open reduction
that must have supplementary stability.
3. Patients un-suited for spica cast
application.
CHIARI OSTEOTOMY
 This is a capsular interposition osteotomy as
the capsule is interposed between the newly
formed acetabular roof and femoral head.
 INDICATIONS:
1. Congenital subluxation in patients 4 to 6 years
or older, including adults.
2. Dysplastic hip with osteoarthritis
3. For Coxa magna after Perthes disease or
avascular necrosis after treatment of congenital
dysplasia.
4. For paralytic dislocation caused by muscular
weakness or spasticity.
TECHNIQUE :ANT-LAT
APPROACH
 The osteotomy is made precisely
between the insertion of the capsule
and reflected head of rectus femoris.
 Ending distal to the AIIS anteriorly
and in sciatic notch posteriorly.
 With a straight narrow osteotome,
start osteotomy on lateral table with
plane directed 20° superiorly towards
inner table.
 The distal fragment is now displaced
medially by forcing the limb into
abduction hinging at symphysis
pubis.
 It is displaced enough medially so
that the proximal fragment
completely covers the femoral head
i.e. about half of the thickness of
bone.
 If necessary the fragments may be
transfixed by screw driven obliquely.
PRE OP POST OP WITH CHIARI
OSTEOTOMIES IN PERTHES
DISEASE
1. SALTER Innominate osteotomy:
2. SHELF procedure (Staheli): If the hip is congruous, it can be
performed for coxa magna and lack of acetabular coverage for
the femoral head.
1. CHIARI Osteotomy: It is used as a salvage procedure to
accomplish coverage of large flattened femoral head.
1. VALGUS EXTENSION osteotomy: Indicated in malformed
femoral head in residual Perthe's disease with hinge
abduction.
PAUWEL'S `Y' OSTEOTOMY
 A guide pin is inserted from the
greater trochanter to head of femur.
 One limb of osteotomy is made from
the base of greater trochanter
towards the base of neck medially
and inferiorly.
 The distal limb of the Y then passes
upwards and medially to reach the
proximal limb and a wedge of bone
with the required correction is
removed from the proximal aspect of
distal fragment with its base
directed laterally.
 The trochanter head segment is
levered into valgus.
 The two fragments are apposed
by displacing the proximal end
of the shaft medially and
abducting the limb.
 The nail is then attached by a
plate to the shaft.
SUGIOKA TRANSTROCHANTRIC
ROTATIONAL OST.
 This is done for osteonecrosis to prevent
progressive collapse of the articular surface and to
improve the congruity of hip joint.
 To do this the femoral head and neck segment is
rotated anteriorly around its longitudinal axis,
though a trans-trochantric osteotomy.
 So that the weight bearing force is transmitted to
the posterior articular surface of femoral head,
which is not involved in the ischemic process.
 Through lateral approach expose the capsule, osteotomize the
greater trochanter.
 Reflect it proximally along with the attached tendon of
Gluteus medius, minimus and Piriformis.
 Incise the joint capsule circumferentially.
 Carefully protect the posterior branch of medial circumflex
femoral artery at inferior edge of Quadratus femoris
 After completing second osteotomy use the
proximal pin to rotate proximal fragment 45-90°
depending on the size of necrotic area.
THANK YOU…

Osteotomies around the hip -sid

  • 1.
    OSTEOTOMIES AROUNDTHE HIP DR. SIDHARTHYADAV JR 2 ORTHOPAEDICS NKPSIMS
  • 2.
    DEFINITION  An osteotomyis a surgical corrective procedure used to obtain a correct biomechanical alignment of the extremity so as to achieve equivocal load transmission, performed with or without removal of a portion of the bone
  • 3.
    HISTORY  First femoralosteotomy was performed by John- Rhea, Barton in 1826 when tried to secure the motion of ankyloid hip.  1835 Sourvier performed first subtronchanteric osteotomy for the treatment of CDH.  1854 Langenback introduced sub-cutaneous osteotomy of the femur.  1918 and 19 Von Baeyer and Lorenz described bifurcation operation of upper femoral osteotomy to secure stability in old CDH.
  • 4.
    HISTORY  1922 Schanzreported his low sub-trochanteric abduction osteotomy.  1935 Pauwels described osteotomy at intertrochanteric level adduction deformity.  1936 McMurry performed oblique displacement osteotomy for osteoarthritis of hip and non-union fracture neck of femur.  1955 Chiari did pelvic osteotomy for stable coverage of head.  Blount and Moore described excellent blade plate for fixation of high sub-trochanteric osteotomy.
  • 5.
    BIO MECHANICS Fo rces acro ss hip jo int  Body Weight  Ground reaction forces  Abductor muscle forces
  • 6.
    2 D STATICANALYSIS  One legged stance 5/6 BODY WEIGHT on femoral head  The force acting on the lever arm is thrice the body weight.
  • 7.
     Osteotomies : Increases the contact area / congruency.  Improves coverage of head.  Moves normal articular cartilage into weight bearing zone.  Restore biomechanical advantage.
  • 8.
    OSTEOTOMY AROUND HIP According to Anatomic Location  Femoral Osteotomy  High Cervical.  Intertrochanteric Osteotomy.  Subtrochanteric Osteotomy.  Greater Trochanteric.  Pelvic Osteotomy.  Salvage Osteotomies : e g . Chiari, She lf.  Reconstructive Osteotomies : e g . Pe riace tabular, Sing le , Do uble , Triple Inno m inate .
  • 9.
    Co ntd.  Basedon Indications  To obtain stability  old unreduced dislocations.  Lorenz bifurcation osteotomy.  Schanz low subtrochanteric.  To obtain union  fractures of femoral neck.  McMurry’s osteotomy.  Dickson's high geometric osteotomy.  Schanz Angulation Osteotomy.  unstable intertrochanteric fractures.  Dimon Hughston Osteotomy.  Sarmiento’s Osteotomy
  • 10.
     Relief ofpain  osteoarathritis.  Pauwel’s type I varus osteotomy.  Pauwel’s type II valgus osteotomy.  To Correct deformities  coxa vara  slipped upper femoral epiphysis  Intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy by dunn.  Compensatory Basilar Osteotomy of Femoral Neck.  Extracapsular Base-of-Neck osteotomy.  Ball-and-Socket Trochanteric Osteotomy.  Pauwel’s osteotomy (Y). Co ntd.Co ntd.
  • 11.
     Osteonecrosis offemoral head Sugioka’s transtrochanteric osteotomy. Varus deroation osteotomy of Axer.  In paralytic disorders of hip. Varus Osteotomy. Rotational Osteotomy  In congenital dislocation. Co ntd.Co ntd.
  • 12.
    CONTRAINDICATIONS OF OSTEOTOMY  NEUROPATHICARTHROPATHY  INFLAMMATORY ARTHROPATHY  ACTIVE INFECTIONS  SEVERE OSTEOPENIA  ADVANCED ARTHRITIS/ANKYLOSIS  ADVANCED AGE  SMOKING, OBESITY
  • 13.
    Principles of Osteotomy Ostoeotomy can be viewed as either  Reconstructive  Salvage  Femoral osteotomy to correct proximal femoral abnormalities.
  • 14.
    FactorsFactors Reconstructive OsteotomyReconstructiveOsteotomy Salvage OsteotomySalvage Osteotomy AgeAge Generally < 25 yearsGenerally < 25 years Generally < 50 yearsGenerally < 50 years (Some biological Plasticity(Some biological Plasticity Remains)Remains) SymptomsSymptoms Minimal (Out Progressive)Minimal (Out Progressive) Moderate to SevereModerate to Severe MotionMotion Near NormalNear Normal > 60> 6000 FlexionFlexion FunctionFunction Near NormalNear Normal Fair to PoorFair to Poor PthoanatomyPthoanatomy No Irreversible ChangesNo Irreversible Changes Irreversible ChangesIrreversible Changes RoentgenograpRoentgenograp hyhy Congruent but MalalignedCongruent but Malaligned SurfacesSurfaces Cartilage narrowing orCartilage narrowing or incongruity or bothincongruity or both Prognosis ifPrognosis if untreateduntreated PoorPoor PoorPoor DIFFERENCE
  • 15.
    PAUWEL’S VARUS OSTEOTOMY Varusintertrochanteric femoral osteotomies are designed to elevate the greater trochanter and move it laterally, while moving the abductor and psoas muscles medially, to :  Restore joint congruity  Decrease the force acting on the edge of the acetabulum moves to the middle of weight bearing surface.
  • 16.
    INDICATIONS  Antalgic abductorlimb  Abduction deformity  Painful adduction  Neck shaft angle > 135°
  • 17.
    Oblique cut is madeparallel to the chisel inserted Proximal fragment is rotated in varus .
  • 18.
    Wedge being shifted to lateralside. FINAL RESULT Insertion of angled blade plate
  • 19.
    TYPES OF WEDGEIN VARUS OSTEOTOMY
  • 20.
    DISADVANTAGES  Shortens thelimb to some degrees.  Creates a trendelenberg gait.  Increases the prominence of greater trochanter.  Overloading of the medial compartment of knee.
  • 21.
    PAUWELS VALGUS OSTEOTOMY Valgusintertrochanteric femoral osteotomies transfer the center of hip rotation medially from the superior aspect of the acetabulum to decrease the weight bearing area of femoral head .  Normally 15° of correction is required. INDICATIONS:  Trendelenburg Limb  Adduction deformity  Motion in adduction beyond adduction deformity  Painful abduction CONTRAINDICATIONS:  Flexion of less than 60°  Knock knees as this will increase the deformity at knee.
  • 22.
     After insertionof guide wire & chisel 2cm proximal to osteotomy site similar to explained before :-
  • 23.
    Pelvic Osteotomies  Reconstructive Salter 18m – 6y  Pemberton 18m – 10y  Steel skeletal maturity  PAO (Ganz) skeletal maturity  Salvage  Chiari skeletal maturity
  • 24.
    SALTER'S INNOMINATE OSTEOTOMY In this, the entire acetabulum together with pubis and ischium is rotated as a unit. INDICATIONS:  CDH in children from 18 months to 9 years of age and in congenital subluxation upto early adult life.  Before the osteotomy, femoral head should be positioned opposite the level of the acetabulum achieved by period of traction.  Contractures of iliopsoas and adductor muscles must be released.
  • 25.
    Osteotomy made from AIISto Greater Sciatic notch
  • 26.
    Graft is takenfrom iliac crest and trained to the shape of a wedge. The distal segment is shifted forward, downward and outward
  • 27.
    Place the graftinto open segment anteriorly. anteriorlyanteriorly
  • 28.
    Secure it bypassing a K- wire from proximal fragment through graft into distal fragment taking care not to enter acetabulum.
  • 29.
     Subluxation inDDH After SALTERS osteotomy
  • 30.
    ADVANTAGES:  Relatively simpleprocedure.  No change in acetabular configuration. DISADVANTAGES:  Relatively unstable needs internal fixation.  Second surgery for pin removal.  Possibility of joint penetration by pins.
  • 31.
    PEMBERTON ACETABULOPLASTY  Thisoperation redirects the inclination of the acetabular roof by an osteotomy of the ilium, superior to the acetabulum followed by levering of the roof inferiorly. INDICATION:  In dysplastic hips between the age of 1 year and the age when the tri-radiate cartilage became too inflexible to serve as a hinge (about 12 years in girls and 14 years in boys).
  • 32.
    First cut ismade from the outer cortex of the ilium, starting just above the AIIS and extending backwards till it reaches triradiate cartilage. A similar cut is made in the medial cortex directing it posteriorly, parallel with the previous one until it reaches the triradiate cartilage.
  • 33.
    With a widecurved osteotome lever the distal fragment distally until anterior edges of two fragments is at least 2-3cm apart. Resect a wedge of bone from anterior part of ilium including ASIS. Place the wedge of bone in the groove made and drive the wedge into place and impact it.
  • 34.
    ADVANTAGES: 1. Osteotomy isincomplete, therefore more stable 2. Internal fixation is not required 3. Greater degree of correction can be achieved with less rotation of the acetabulum. DISADVANTAGES: 1. Technically more difficult 2. It alters the configuration and capacity of the acetabulum and can result in an incongruence relationship between it and femoral head.
  • 35.
    Acetabular dysplasia aftertreatment of CDH with Pemberton acetabuloplasty on Right side.
  • 36.
    TRIPLE INNOMINATE OSTEOTOMYBY STEEL  INDICATIONS- :- Adolescents & skeletally mature adults with residual dysplasia & subluxation in whom remodelling of acetabulum is no longer anticipated.  ADVANTAGE – Better coverage of femoral head by articular cartilage , Better hip joint stability, no need of spica cast. 1 2 3
  • 38.
    1.Osteotomy made from AIISto Greater Sciatic notch
  • 39.
    2. Ischial ramusis divided posterolaterally at 45° from perpendicular.
  • 40.
    3.Superior pubic ramus isdivided posteromedially 15° from perpendicular.
  • 41.
     DISADVANTAGES: 1. Difficultto perform. 2. Does not change the size of the acetabulum. 3. It distorts the pelvis so natural child birth is impossible in adulthood. MODIFIED BY LIPTON & BOWEN 1. Resecting 1-1.5 cm bone from ischial tuberosity to favor medialization. 2. To resect a triangular wedge from outer part of ilium which favors slot formation which serves as abutment. 3. Use 7.3mm cannulated screws instead of steinmann pins.
  • 42.
    SHELF OSTEOTOMY BY STAHELI Have commonly been performed to enlarge the volume of the acetabulum.  The objective is to create a shelf, the size of which is decided by measuring the “width of augmentation (WA)” using the CE angle of wiberg.  Best to do after 5 years of age.
  • 43.
     CE Angleis measured in standing AP radiograph.
  • 44.
     After packingthe graft the rectus femoris is sutured for stability of the graft .  Postoperative: hip spica can be applied in 15 deg of abduction and 20° of flexion. Pre operative post op
  • 45.
     CONTRA-INDICATIONS: 1. DDHwith spherical congruity suited for re-directional osteotomy. 2. Hips requiring concurrent open reduction that must have supplementary stability. 3. Patients un-suited for spica cast application.
  • 46.
    CHIARI OSTEOTOMY  Thisis a capsular interposition osteotomy as the capsule is interposed between the newly formed acetabular roof and femoral head.  INDICATIONS: 1. Congenital subluxation in patients 4 to 6 years or older, including adults. 2. Dysplastic hip with osteoarthritis 3. For Coxa magna after Perthes disease or avascular necrosis after treatment of congenital dysplasia. 4. For paralytic dislocation caused by muscular weakness or spasticity.
  • 47.
    TECHNIQUE :ANT-LAT APPROACH  Theosteotomy is made precisely between the insertion of the capsule and reflected head of rectus femoris.  Ending distal to the AIIS anteriorly and in sciatic notch posteriorly.  With a straight narrow osteotome, start osteotomy on lateral table with plane directed 20° superiorly towards inner table.
  • 48.
     The distalfragment is now displaced medially by forcing the limb into abduction hinging at symphysis pubis.  It is displaced enough medially so that the proximal fragment completely covers the femoral head i.e. about half of the thickness of bone.  If necessary the fragments may be transfixed by screw driven obliquely.
  • 49.
    PRE OP POSTOP WITH CHIARI
  • 50.
    OSTEOTOMIES IN PERTHES DISEASE 1.SALTER Innominate osteotomy: 2. SHELF procedure (Staheli): If the hip is congruous, it can be performed for coxa magna and lack of acetabular coverage for the femoral head. 1. CHIARI Osteotomy: It is used as a salvage procedure to accomplish coverage of large flattened femoral head. 1. VALGUS EXTENSION osteotomy: Indicated in malformed femoral head in residual Perthe's disease with hinge abduction.
  • 51.
    PAUWEL'S `Y' OSTEOTOMY A guide pin is inserted from the greater trochanter to head of femur.  One limb of osteotomy is made from the base of greater trochanter towards the base of neck medially and inferiorly.  The distal limb of the Y then passes upwards and medially to reach the proximal limb and a wedge of bone with the required correction is removed from the proximal aspect of distal fragment with its base directed laterally.
  • 52.
     The trochanterhead segment is levered into valgus.  The two fragments are apposed by displacing the proximal end of the shaft medially and abducting the limb.  The nail is then attached by a plate to the shaft.
  • 53.
    SUGIOKA TRANSTROCHANTRIC ROTATIONAL OST. This is done for osteonecrosis to prevent progressive collapse of the articular surface and to improve the congruity of hip joint.  To do this the femoral head and neck segment is rotated anteriorly around its longitudinal axis, though a trans-trochantric osteotomy.  So that the weight bearing force is transmitted to the posterior articular surface of femoral head, which is not involved in the ischemic process.
  • 54.
     Through lateralapproach expose the capsule, osteotomize the greater trochanter.  Reflect it proximally along with the attached tendon of Gluteus medius, minimus and Piriformis.  Incise the joint capsule circumferentially.  Carefully protect the posterior branch of medial circumflex femoral artery at inferior edge of Quadratus femoris
  • 55.
     After completingsecond osteotomy use the proximal pin to rotate proximal fragment 45-90° depending on the size of necrotic area.
  • 56.

Editor's Notes

  • #6 Improving abductor mech will decrease joint reactiion forces.
  • #15 Reconstructive osteotomy can prevent or delay the development of osteoarthritis. If mild or moderate osteoarthritis is present , a salvage osteotomy can improve function &amp; may delay the need of total hip arthroplasty. The goal of reconstructive osteotomy is to restore as nearly normal anatomy as possible returning joint pressure &amp; loading pattern to normal. Reconstructive are generally indicated in younger patients. If the shape of the articular surface is relatvely normal &amp; primary problem is malalingment. Goal of salvage osteotomy id to relieve pain &amp; improve function enough to delay the need for thr.
  • #16 Varus ostetomy with the medial displacement of femoral shaft relaxes the adductor muscles &amp; abductor; unload the hip joint &amp; increases the weight bearing area.
  • #17 As described by BLOUNTS.
  • #20 A. PAUWELS TECHNIQUE. (B) MULLER TECHNIQUE. (C) MODIFIED MULLERS.
  • #21 CONTRAINDICATIONS : Fixed external rotation of &gt; 25° Flexion of 70° or less.
  • #33 After exposing the hip through anterior Ilio femoral approach
  • #35 Acetabular roof then should remain in a corrected position. Postoperatively a hip spica is given for 8-12 weeks.