Tony Ross-Hellauer describes OpenAIRE's work to define and survey stakeholder attitudes to open peer review. For Peer Review Week 2017, OpenAIRE and OpenUP hosted a webinar entitled "Open Peer Review: Models, Attitudes and Next Steps – a webinar from OpenUP and OpenAIRE". Recordings shortly available: https://www.openaire.eu/open-peer-review-models-attitudes-and-next-steps-a-webinar-from-openup-and-openaire Time: 12.00 CEST, Friday 15 September 2017 Webinar overview: New models of open peer review (OPR) are emerging that open up traditional, closed processes, making them more transparent, collaborative and/or network-based. This webinar will describe recent work conducted by the OpenAIRE and OpenUP projects to define models of OPR, gauge stakeholder attitudes and lay out a roadmap for future OPR implementation. It will focus on how OPR can potentially strengthen research evaluation, describing how alternative peer review tools and methods could better shape scholarly communication and how they contribute to the strengthening Open Science agenda. Specific issues included in the presentations are the variety of models; barriers/drivers for moving OPR mainstream; attitudes to OPR (what reviewers, authors and editors actually want); how to motivate and credit review work; technical infrastructure and platforms; and the next steps for researching the efficacy of different OPR models. The webinar will be of interest to all with an interest in how research evaluation can better meet the aims of Open Science.

1. Open Peer Review:
Defintions and Attitudes
Tony Ross-Hellauer
State and University Library
Göttingen
Know-Center GmbH
OpenAIRE/OpenUP Webinar: Open Peer
Review: Models, Attitudes and Next Steps
#PeerRevWk17, 15 Sept 2017

3. OpenAIRE
Dec. 2009 – Nov.
2012
OpenAIREplus
Dec. 2011 – Dec.
2014
OpenAIRE2020
Jan. 2015 – Jun.
2018
Now in its third project phase of EC project funding.

4. •
•
•
+ Research and development into new trends in
scholarly communication
•
•
•
•
•
•

5. •
•

8. Findabilityity &
visibility
Transparency
Responsibility
& rigour
Community &
collaboration
Inclusivity &
equality
Accountability
Reproducibility
Interoperability
& re-usability
Open Science

9. •
•
•
•

11. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
Image CC BY AC McCann, w/ amendment (by me)
** 122 definitions collected and analysed **
** 22 distinct configurations of 7 traits identified **
See: Ross-Hellauer, 2017, "What is open peer review? A
systematic review", F1000Research (DOI:
10.12688/f1000research.11369.2)

12. Ross-Hellauer, 2017, "What is open peer review? A systematic review",
F1000Research (DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2)

13. Ross-Hellauer, 2017, "What is
open peer review? A systematic
review", F1000Research (DOI:
10.12688/f1000research.11369.2)

14. •
•
•
•
•

15. CC0 Public Domain
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

16. CC BY-SA Testbirds GmbH
•
•
•
•
•
•

18. •
•
•
•
•

19. •
•
•

24. •
•
•
•
•

26. •
•
•
•

27. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

28. www.openaire.eu
@openaire_eu
facebook.com/groups/openaire
linkedin.com/groups/OpenAIRE-
3893548
Thank you!