Resuscitation of Babies born through MSAF
2015 AHA Guidelines Update for CPR
• MSAF incidence-5% in PT,17% in term,27% in post
term.
• MAS 2-10% of babies born through MSAF
• Universal oropharyngeal suctioning on the perineum
followed by routine intubation and suctioning of the
trachea at birth was generally practiced .
• Practice abandoned vigorous babies born through
MSAF at birth did not benefit from intervention and
could avoid the risk of intubation
2015 AHA Guidelines:
• Presence of MSAF -indicate fetal distress -infant may
require resuscitation ,individual skilled in tracheal
intubation should be present at the time of birth.
• Vigorous baby the infant stay with the mother initial
steps of newborn care-Gentle clearing of meconium from the
mouth and nose with a bulb syringe may be done if necessary.
• Non vigorous-Initial steps of resuscitation , PPV
initiated if the infant is not breathing or the heart
rate is less than 100/min after the initial steps are
completed.
• Routine intubation for tracheal suction in this
setting is not suggested, because there is
insufficient evidence .
• Greater value has been placed on harm
avoidance (ie, delays BMV,harm of the
procedure) over the unknown benefit of the
intervention of routine tracheal intubation and
suctioning.
• Emphasis should be made on initiating ventilation
within the first minute of life.
Chettri S, Adhisivam B, Bhat BV. Endotracheal suction for nonvigorous
neonates born through meconium stained amniotic fluid: a randomized
controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2015;166:1208–1213.
• Term, nonvigorous babies born through MSAF
were randomized to endotracheal suction and
no-suction groups (n=61 ).
• 39 (32%) neonates developed MAS and 18
(14.8%) of them died
• There were no significant differences in MAS,
its severity and complications, mortality, and
neurodevelopmental outcome for the 2
groups.
TOPIC NRP 2010 NRP 2015 ERC-2015 LOE COMMENTS
Clearing
the airway
when
meconium
is presesnt
Endotracheal
Suctioning in
non vigorous
baby.
1)Routine
intubation
and ET
suctioning not
indicated in
non vigorous
baby.
2)Initial steps
followed by
PPV should be
done as
routine
indiactions
Same as NRP-
2015.
Routine use of
surfactant not
indicated.
Class 2B -Major
change
having wide
implications.
-Emphasizes
on earlier
initiation of
PPV in non
vigorous
babies born
through
MSAF
NRP 2015 update on MSAF

NRP 2015 update on MSAF

  • 1.
    Resuscitation of Babiesborn through MSAF 2015 AHA Guidelines Update for CPR
  • 2.
    • MSAF incidence-5%in PT,17% in term,27% in post term. • MAS 2-10% of babies born through MSAF • Universal oropharyngeal suctioning on the perineum followed by routine intubation and suctioning of the trachea at birth was generally practiced . • Practice abandoned vigorous babies born through MSAF at birth did not benefit from intervention and could avoid the risk of intubation
  • 3.
    2015 AHA Guidelines: •Presence of MSAF -indicate fetal distress -infant may require resuscitation ,individual skilled in tracheal intubation should be present at the time of birth. • Vigorous baby the infant stay with the mother initial steps of newborn care-Gentle clearing of meconium from the mouth and nose with a bulb syringe may be done if necessary. • Non vigorous-Initial steps of resuscitation , PPV initiated if the infant is not breathing or the heart rate is less than 100/min after the initial steps are completed.
  • 4.
    • Routine intubationfor tracheal suction in this setting is not suggested, because there is insufficient evidence . • Greater value has been placed on harm avoidance (ie, delays BMV,harm of the procedure) over the unknown benefit of the intervention of routine tracheal intubation and suctioning. • Emphasis should be made on initiating ventilation within the first minute of life.
  • 5.
    Chettri S, AdhisivamB, Bhat BV. Endotracheal suction for nonvigorous neonates born through meconium stained amniotic fluid: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2015;166:1208–1213. • Term, nonvigorous babies born through MSAF were randomized to endotracheal suction and no-suction groups (n=61 ). • 39 (32%) neonates developed MAS and 18 (14.8%) of them died • There were no significant differences in MAS, its severity and complications, mortality, and neurodevelopmental outcome for the 2 groups.
  • 6.
    TOPIC NRP 2010NRP 2015 ERC-2015 LOE COMMENTS Clearing the airway when meconium is presesnt Endotracheal Suctioning in non vigorous baby. 1)Routine intubation and ET suctioning not indicated in non vigorous baby. 2)Initial steps followed by PPV should be done as routine indiactions Same as NRP- 2015. Routine use of surfactant not indicated. Class 2B -Major change having wide implications. -Emphasizes on earlier initiation of PPV in non vigorous babies born through MSAF