We compare how priorities have evolved for residents between 2019 and now at a borough wide and neighbourhood level, and with a special focus on young people. We compare how our residents’ satisfaction with the local area and the council has evolved since 2020 and what areas it has improved in and where there is a need to improve, with a particular focus on our tenants & leaseholders. We outline what residents most want improved in terms of engagement and what issues they’d most like to get involved in, as well how our residents’ ability to count on each other has evolved, with a particular focus on inclusion & cohesion
Webinar: Unlock the power of national, regional and local dataPolicy in Practice
View these webinar slides to learn about national, regional and local case studies.
You will hear:
1. Nationally: How the two child limit to tax credits is set to drive child poverty up by 10% by 2020
2. Regionally: First wave results from our work tracking income, employment and poverty for over half a million low-income households across London
3. Locally: How Winchester City Council's data led strategy uncovered hidden pockets of poverty
Background
The post-2015 welfare reforms will take almost £13bn a year from claimants by 2020-21, bringing the cumulative loss since 2010 to £27bn a year. This is equivalent to £690 a year for every adult of working age, according to analysis by Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research.
Professor Christina Beatty said that the worst is yet to come for those who will be most severly hit, namely low income families with children. She urged local authorities to plan ahead for the impact.
Understanding exactly which low income households will be impacted by the welfare reforms, and how, is the challenge. Policy in Practice works with local authorities to do just that.
Our Low Income Family Tracker combines local authority data with a powerful modelling engine to show the aggregate and cumulative impact of reforms on each household so that local authorities can get the right support to those who need help the most, before crisis hits.
More info
Visit http://policyinpractice.co.uk/low-income-family-tracker/ for more details or email hello@policyinpractice.co.uk.
Policy in Practice analyst Juan Alvarez Vilanova spoke about How longitudinal analysis can help prevent poverty at at Public Policy Exchange's recent event.
Juan's talk featured case studies of data analysis for clients such as Croydon Council and Trust for London, The event was titled Preventing Further Poverty in the UK: Supporting and Improving the Lives of ‘Just About Managing’ Families.
In this State of the Borough, we share an:
• Introduction setting the scene
• Overview of the challenges the borough faces, the progress we’ve made and
delivery we’re planning next
The appendix outlines
• Evidence that underpins work on each of the pillars for Towards a Better Newham
• Case studies of what we have done as a council to tackle the challenges
• Stories from residents who have benefited from these activities
• Commitments we have made on what we will deliver going forwards
Sipple - Shared Services: A Common Reform that WorksJohn Sipple
These are slides from my June 17, 2014 presentation at the Municipal Exchange (MIX) conference in Troy, NY. I reported research findings on shared municipal and school district services, including obstacle, motivators, and outcomes.
Comprehensive Spending Review & Levelling Up - LondonNoel Hatch
The session was focused on understanding the key priorities for Levelling Up and what could be the key challenges & opportunities for the Comprehensive Spending Review, with a London perspective from the GLA and the national perspective from the Institute for Government
With Graham Atkins, Associate Director, Institute for Government and Dr Michelle Reeves, Senior Manager - Policy and Programmes, Strategy Team, City Intelligence Unit, GLA.
The presentations were followed by a discussion on what key issues for councils and public services in London.
Webinar: Unlock the power of national, regional and local dataPolicy in Practice
View these webinar slides to learn about national, regional and local case studies.
You will hear:
1. Nationally: How the two child limit to tax credits is set to drive child poverty up by 10% by 2020
2. Regionally: First wave results from our work tracking income, employment and poverty for over half a million low-income households across London
3. Locally: How Winchester City Council's data led strategy uncovered hidden pockets of poverty
Background
The post-2015 welfare reforms will take almost £13bn a year from claimants by 2020-21, bringing the cumulative loss since 2010 to £27bn a year. This is equivalent to £690 a year for every adult of working age, according to analysis by Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research.
Professor Christina Beatty said that the worst is yet to come for those who will be most severly hit, namely low income families with children. She urged local authorities to plan ahead for the impact.
Understanding exactly which low income households will be impacted by the welfare reforms, and how, is the challenge. Policy in Practice works with local authorities to do just that.
Our Low Income Family Tracker combines local authority data with a powerful modelling engine to show the aggregate and cumulative impact of reforms on each household so that local authorities can get the right support to those who need help the most, before crisis hits.
More info
Visit http://policyinpractice.co.uk/low-income-family-tracker/ for more details or email hello@policyinpractice.co.uk.
Policy in Practice analyst Juan Alvarez Vilanova spoke about How longitudinal analysis can help prevent poverty at at Public Policy Exchange's recent event.
Juan's talk featured case studies of data analysis for clients such as Croydon Council and Trust for London, The event was titled Preventing Further Poverty in the UK: Supporting and Improving the Lives of ‘Just About Managing’ Families.
In this State of the Borough, we share an:
• Introduction setting the scene
• Overview of the challenges the borough faces, the progress we’ve made and
delivery we’re planning next
The appendix outlines
• Evidence that underpins work on each of the pillars for Towards a Better Newham
• Case studies of what we have done as a council to tackle the challenges
• Stories from residents who have benefited from these activities
• Commitments we have made on what we will deliver going forwards
Sipple - Shared Services: A Common Reform that WorksJohn Sipple
These are slides from my June 17, 2014 presentation at the Municipal Exchange (MIX) conference in Troy, NY. I reported research findings on shared municipal and school district services, including obstacle, motivators, and outcomes.
Comprehensive Spending Review & Levelling Up - LondonNoel Hatch
The session was focused on understanding the key priorities for Levelling Up and what could be the key challenges & opportunities for the Comprehensive Spending Review, with a London perspective from the GLA and the national perspective from the Institute for Government
With Graham Atkins, Associate Director, Institute for Government and Dr Michelle Reeves, Senior Manager - Policy and Programmes, Strategy Team, City Intelligence Unit, GLA.
The presentations were followed by a discussion on what key issues for councils and public services in London.
Keynote speech from Andrew Dilnot, Chair of the Commission on Funding of Care and Support - 'Searching for Social Care Solutions'
Find out more at http://www.ageuk.org.uk/conferences
IRRV2015 - Progress on Welfare Reform by Deven GhelaniPolicy in Practice
The IRRV Annual Conference 2015 featured this presentation by Deven Ghelani about Progress on Welfare Reform.
Understanding the impact of cumulative and future welfare reforms on individual residents was at the heart of Deven's talk.
Stark insights from welfare reform impact analysis work done with Leeds City Council and Birmingham City Council were shared.
Deven outlined how specific welfare reforms have different impacts and what these mean to individual residents.
Policy makers in local authorities need to make sure that their policies are appropriate to local needs. Yet, without the insights that councils like Leeds and Birmingham have secured, the risk is that support programmes are blanket and wasteful, not targeted and effective.
London Councils' Welfare Reform Impact Assessment presentationPolicy in Practice
Deven Ghelani presented to the London Councils' Benefits Managers meeting on Thursday 21 January about Welfare Reform Impact Assessment.
Deven shared the approach that Policy in Practice has used to help local authorities in London to understand the impact of welfare reform on individual households. He shared insights from the recent analysis carried out for LB Hounslow.
IRRV WELFARE REFORM AND BENEFITS SEMINAR: The Reality of the Social Impact of...Policy in Practice
Deven Ghelani, Policy in Practice, spoke at the IRRV Welfare Reform and Benefits Seminar – Are We Facing An Impending Disaster? on
The IRRV’s annual seminar on Welfare Reform and Benefits addressed the key issues on Welfare Reform and looked in detail at the Government’s proposal for the months and years to come.
Deven Ghelani, CEO and Founder, Policy in Practice, will delivered the following session at 10:35 am:
The Reality of the Social Impact of Welfare Reform
What will be the detailed social impact of Welfare Reform? What pressure will be placed on local authorities in delivering their statutory functions particularly in relation to housing and local taxation? How will local authorities continue to maintain these functions whilst facing up to the demands of the Governments austerity programme?
View his slides here.
OECD Recommendation on Public Integrity - 26 January 2017 OECD Governance
The OECD Recommendation on Public Integrity provides policy makers with the blueprint for a public integrity strategy.
It shifts the focus from ad hoc integrity policies to a comprehensive, risk-based approach with an emphasis on cultivating a culture of integrity across the whole of society. For more information see www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/recommendation-public-integrity.htm
Latest findings from Policy in Practice's data led investigation into the causes and consequences of poverty in London were presented on 20 September 2018.
We recently shared the latest findings from our pan-london analysis of living standards, tracking 600,000 low income families across 19 London boroughs over two years. The work is unique in its use of large scale administrative data, linked over time, and its ability to look forward at poverty projections for individual households. The approach is being used by a dozen local authorities across the UK to target support.
Highlights from Phase Three include:
Low income Londoners are becoming less financially resilient. The proportion of Londoners with low financial resilience has grown by 20% in the last two years, and will continue to grow through to 2020
Employment helps build financial resilience. Employment is the main driver of people improving their financial resilience; for people affected, welfare reforms are a driver of lower resilience, but they don’t tell the full story
Living standards fluctuate. Over two years a quarter of low income households in work lost their job at least once; improving job stability can help build resilience
The future isn’t bright. Londoners on low incomes face a bleak future with an average drop in their disposable income of £100 p/w if rents and other livings costs continue to rise as expected.
For more information visit www.policyinpractice.co.uk/low-income-Londoners, email hello@policyinpractice.co.uk or call 0330 088 9242.
Review of International Regulatory Co-operation of the United KingdomOECD Governance
International regulatory co-operation (IRC) provides an opportunity for countries to consider the impacts of their regulations beyond their borders, to expand the evidence for decision-making, to learn from the experience of their peers and to develop concerted approaches to challenges that transcend borders. This review documents the context of IRC policies and practices in the United Kingdom. It covers both the UK’s unilateral efforts to embed international considerations in domestic rulemaking and its bilateral, regional and multilateral co-operative efforts on regulatory matters.
In the first in a series of NCVO Brexit seminars in collaboration with UK in a Changing Europe, Thomas Leeper, associate professor in politics at the London School of Economics, explored the latest trends and insight into public attitudes to Brexit.
100713 GOSE Big Society presentation to Consortia Coordinators July 2010Mark Walker
What is this Big Society stuff all about? Is it a smokescreen for Government cuts or a game-changing attempt to change the way our communities are run?
Vicky Westhorp of GOSE provided an excellent summary of what it's all about at a Capacitybuilders meeting of the Coordinators of ChangeUp Consortia in the south east. In other words people who work in the voluntary and community sector at a local level.
This presentation covers a lot of the background as well as the latest news and announcements.
Please use the comments space below the presentation to ask questions or add your thoughts about what is being proposed. I've offered to help moderate a discussion via this page, and/or via the email forum for the Coordinators [contact me for details]
Mark Walker
ICT Champion for the third sector in south east England
Experience with the Governance and Transparency Fund ODI_Webmaster
A presentation given by ODI Research Fellow Fletcher Tembo on Experience with the Governance and Transparency Fund. The presentation was given at the 3rd Annual ebpdn Parnters Meeting held in Colombo, Sri Lanka from 26-27 November 2007.
Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching th...OECD Governance
This highlights document covers the main findings and proposals from the Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave report. Public authorities from all levels of government increasingly turn to Citizens' Assemblies, Juries, Panels and other representative deliberative processes to tackle complex policy problems ranging from climate change to infrastructure investment decisions. Based on the analysis of close to 300 representative deliberative practices, the report explores trends in such processes, identifies different models, and analyses the trade-offs among different design choices as well as the benefits and limits of public deliberation. It also explores the reasons and routes for embedding deliberative activities into public institutions to give citizens a more permanent and meaningful role in shaping the policies affecting their lives.
BCG has launched its Telco Sustainability Index, designed to capture the four dimensions most relevant to a telco’s environmental strategy. The index tracks the company’s commitment to sustainability, its emissions intensity and that of its upstream and downstream partners, its elimination of waste, and its customer enablement.
Keynote speech from Andrew Dilnot, Chair of the Commission on Funding of Care and Support - 'Searching for Social Care Solutions'
Find out more at http://www.ageuk.org.uk/conferences
IRRV2015 - Progress on Welfare Reform by Deven GhelaniPolicy in Practice
The IRRV Annual Conference 2015 featured this presentation by Deven Ghelani about Progress on Welfare Reform.
Understanding the impact of cumulative and future welfare reforms on individual residents was at the heart of Deven's talk.
Stark insights from welfare reform impact analysis work done with Leeds City Council and Birmingham City Council were shared.
Deven outlined how specific welfare reforms have different impacts and what these mean to individual residents.
Policy makers in local authorities need to make sure that their policies are appropriate to local needs. Yet, without the insights that councils like Leeds and Birmingham have secured, the risk is that support programmes are blanket and wasteful, not targeted and effective.
London Councils' Welfare Reform Impact Assessment presentationPolicy in Practice
Deven Ghelani presented to the London Councils' Benefits Managers meeting on Thursday 21 January about Welfare Reform Impact Assessment.
Deven shared the approach that Policy in Practice has used to help local authorities in London to understand the impact of welfare reform on individual households. He shared insights from the recent analysis carried out for LB Hounslow.
IRRV WELFARE REFORM AND BENEFITS SEMINAR: The Reality of the Social Impact of...Policy in Practice
Deven Ghelani, Policy in Practice, spoke at the IRRV Welfare Reform and Benefits Seminar – Are We Facing An Impending Disaster? on
The IRRV’s annual seminar on Welfare Reform and Benefits addressed the key issues on Welfare Reform and looked in detail at the Government’s proposal for the months and years to come.
Deven Ghelani, CEO and Founder, Policy in Practice, will delivered the following session at 10:35 am:
The Reality of the Social Impact of Welfare Reform
What will be the detailed social impact of Welfare Reform? What pressure will be placed on local authorities in delivering their statutory functions particularly in relation to housing and local taxation? How will local authorities continue to maintain these functions whilst facing up to the demands of the Governments austerity programme?
View his slides here.
OECD Recommendation on Public Integrity - 26 January 2017 OECD Governance
The OECD Recommendation on Public Integrity provides policy makers with the blueprint for a public integrity strategy.
It shifts the focus from ad hoc integrity policies to a comprehensive, risk-based approach with an emphasis on cultivating a culture of integrity across the whole of society. For more information see www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/recommendation-public-integrity.htm
Latest findings from Policy in Practice's data led investigation into the causes and consequences of poverty in London were presented on 20 September 2018.
We recently shared the latest findings from our pan-london analysis of living standards, tracking 600,000 low income families across 19 London boroughs over two years. The work is unique in its use of large scale administrative data, linked over time, and its ability to look forward at poverty projections for individual households. The approach is being used by a dozen local authorities across the UK to target support.
Highlights from Phase Three include:
Low income Londoners are becoming less financially resilient. The proportion of Londoners with low financial resilience has grown by 20% in the last two years, and will continue to grow through to 2020
Employment helps build financial resilience. Employment is the main driver of people improving their financial resilience; for people affected, welfare reforms are a driver of lower resilience, but they don’t tell the full story
Living standards fluctuate. Over two years a quarter of low income households in work lost their job at least once; improving job stability can help build resilience
The future isn’t bright. Londoners on low incomes face a bleak future with an average drop in their disposable income of £100 p/w if rents and other livings costs continue to rise as expected.
For more information visit www.policyinpractice.co.uk/low-income-Londoners, email hello@policyinpractice.co.uk or call 0330 088 9242.
Review of International Regulatory Co-operation of the United KingdomOECD Governance
International regulatory co-operation (IRC) provides an opportunity for countries to consider the impacts of their regulations beyond their borders, to expand the evidence for decision-making, to learn from the experience of their peers and to develop concerted approaches to challenges that transcend borders. This review documents the context of IRC policies and practices in the United Kingdom. It covers both the UK’s unilateral efforts to embed international considerations in domestic rulemaking and its bilateral, regional and multilateral co-operative efforts on regulatory matters.
In the first in a series of NCVO Brexit seminars in collaboration with UK in a Changing Europe, Thomas Leeper, associate professor in politics at the London School of Economics, explored the latest trends and insight into public attitudes to Brexit.
100713 GOSE Big Society presentation to Consortia Coordinators July 2010Mark Walker
What is this Big Society stuff all about? Is it a smokescreen for Government cuts or a game-changing attempt to change the way our communities are run?
Vicky Westhorp of GOSE provided an excellent summary of what it's all about at a Capacitybuilders meeting of the Coordinators of ChangeUp Consortia in the south east. In other words people who work in the voluntary and community sector at a local level.
This presentation covers a lot of the background as well as the latest news and announcements.
Please use the comments space below the presentation to ask questions or add your thoughts about what is being proposed. I've offered to help moderate a discussion via this page, and/or via the email forum for the Coordinators [contact me for details]
Mark Walker
ICT Champion for the third sector in south east England
Experience with the Governance and Transparency Fund ODI_Webmaster
A presentation given by ODI Research Fellow Fletcher Tembo on Experience with the Governance and Transparency Fund. The presentation was given at the 3rd Annual ebpdn Parnters Meeting held in Colombo, Sri Lanka from 26-27 November 2007.
Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching th...OECD Governance
This highlights document covers the main findings and proposals from the Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave report. Public authorities from all levels of government increasingly turn to Citizens' Assemblies, Juries, Panels and other representative deliberative processes to tackle complex policy problems ranging from climate change to infrastructure investment decisions. Based on the analysis of close to 300 representative deliberative practices, the report explores trends in such processes, identifies different models, and analyses the trade-offs among different design choices as well as the benefits and limits of public deliberation. It also explores the reasons and routes for embedding deliberative activities into public institutions to give citizens a more permanent and meaningful role in shaping the policies affecting their lives.
BCG has launched its Telco Sustainability Index, designed to capture the four dimensions most relevant to a telco’s environmental strategy. The index tracks the company’s commitment to sustainability, its emissions intensity and that of its upstream and downstream partners, its elimination of waste, and its customer enablement.
Plenary Presentation | Aromar Revi to UN General Assembly OWG on an #urbanSDGAromar Revi
Plenary Presentation by Aromar Revi to UN General Assembly Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals at the 7th General Assembly Open Working Group(OWG) on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
BCG has launched its Telco Sustainability Index, designed to capture the four dimensions most relevant to a telco’s environmental strategy. The index tracks the company’s commitment to sustainability, its emissions intensity and that of its upstream and downstream partners, its elimination of waste, and its customer enablement.
Citizen's charter - From The Perspective of BangladeshShimanta Easin
Citizen's Charter - from the perspective of Bangladesh
Prepared according to cabinet division citizen charter's
Updated Guideline of 2020
Presented By: Assistant Commissioners of Natore DC office - 38th BCS Batch
Prepared By: Easin Sadek
REDD+ project and its impact households’ incomes in Indonesian Borneo: Prelim...CIFOR-ICRAF
Presented by Sandy Nofyanza (CIFOR-ICRAF) at "2023 FLARE Annual Meeting - Parallel Session 16: REDD+ and local livelihoods", Nairobi, Kenya, on 14 Oct 2023
Leveraging mobile to achieve SDGs targets finalprojectAntonino Galo
This is a short Description related to Regulator´s policy, decision & procedures to promote human development, directed to people involved in policy & decision making.
The regulator most establish a framework, rules & mandates to incentivize MNOs to be active part in SDGs accomplishment by 2030.
Regulators must be facilitators & play active roles together with other government entities and MNOs to develop strategies to assure a good implementation of SDGs plans and activities to improve people lives and also to verify the metric used in order to avoid any kind of “embellishment”.
Then the regulator most to communicate effectively those action/activities/acts to MNOs or other parts involved in SDGs promotions.
Concept note on 100 Indian smart citiesPhani Mohan K
The 35-page blue print includes various suggestions on operational procedures, approval process for proposals, nature and extent of Central Government support on financing, capacity building, which would be useful for further discussions.
It outlines in detail about the several facilities that would be developed in smart cities including reliable utility services,efficient social infrastructure and a smart transport system, which would restrict the travel time within the city to 30 to 45 minutes, 100 per cent coverage of road network with storm water drainage network and 100 per cent access to toilets.
All smart cities will need to have a master plan valid for the next 10 years in addition to having digitised spatial maps, regularly updated open data platforms, amongst other benchmarks specified in the Annexures of the concept note.
Physical infrastructure such as the urban mobility system, the housing stock, energy system, water supply system, drainage system, solid waste management and sewerage system etc will have to be integrated through the use of geospatial technology.
Universal access to electricity and water 24 X 7 will be a given.
The municipal offices will have to be fully automated so that citizens have the ability to seek and the municipal offices the ability to deliver services in real time, through IT based facilities.
In terms of social infrastructure, good and high quality education, healthcare and entertainment services are essential.
Adoption of energy-efficient and environmentally benign practices in the use of building material, transport system, sewerage and water supply systems, street lighting, air-conditioning systems and energy consumption in buildings will be non-negotiable.
The document also states that a city having a population of up to 40 lakh or more, cities of tourist and religious importance and select cities which have a population of less than 10 lakh and all state and union territory capitals will get an opportunity to nominate a satellite city for the “Smart City” project.
“In Delhi, it is being proposed that DDA will develop a new smart city through the land pooling scheme as a demonstratively and the NDMC area may be considered for demonstrating all the components of smart cities,” the note says.
While a strong citizen participation in decision-making will be crucial for smart cities, a principle of ‘governance by incentives rather than governance by enforcement’ has to be adopted.
A national urbanization policy would be crucial for guiding the national government financial support to smart cities.
The release of concept note is followed by a National Conclave of States and Union Territories, which is being held on Friday, September 12 to invite suggestions on the blue print.
Barry Fong, Principal Social Policy Analyst at the Greater London Authority (GLA) will take us through the Survey of Londoners 2021-22. Conducted at the end of 2021, so just before the full effects of the cost-of-living crisis began to set in, it was commissioned to provide vital evidence on key social outcomes for Londoners, following the onset of COVID-19 and associated restrictions.
A similar survey was conducted in 2018-19, so this survey would show how things had changed in the capital since then.
Barry will go through some of the key findings from the survey before handing over to Michael Cheetham and Ellen Bloomer from the North East London Integrated Care Board, who collaborated with local authority partners to fund a sample boost for the survey within North East London. They will explain how they used the data, including the analyses, the results and how this impacted strategy and practice.
Barry Fong, Principal Social Policy Analyst at the Greater London Authority (GLA) will take us through the Survey of Londoners 2021-22. Conducted at the end of 2021, so just before the full effects of the cost-of-living crisis began to set in, it was commissioned to provide vital evidence on key social outcomes for Londoners, following the onset of COVID-19 and associated restrictions.
A similar survey was conducted in 2018-19, so this survey would show how things had changed in the capital since then.
Barry will go through some of the key findings from the survey before handing over to Michael Cheetham and Ellen Bloomer from the North East London Integrated Care Board, who collaborated with local authority partners to fund a sample boost for the survey within North East London. They will explain how they used the data, including the analyses, the results and how this impacted strategy and practice.
How can humanities research contribute to policy 2Noel Hatch
There is always a danger that the humanities are overlooked in favour of the social sciences or ‘hard’ sciences in research-policy engagement, when the former have an important role to play.
The session will provide case studies and a facilitated discussion to better understand the potential implications and challenges for policymakers of engaging with humanities researchers.
The London Strategy and Policy Network and the London Research and Policy Partnership invite you to join a session to explore the contributions that humanities research can make to policy by bringing together humanities researchers and policymakers from across the capital and beyond.
Welcome and introduction (1:00 – 1:10pm)
Chaired by:
Professor Ben Rogers, Professor of Practice, University of London & Bloomberg Fellow to LSE Cities
Overview: How can humanists and policymakers work together? Benefits and opportunities of humanities research and policy engagement (1:10 – 1:20pm)
Presented by:
Jo Fox, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Research & Engagement) & Dean, School of Advanced Study, University of London.
Case study 1: Lessons from ‘The Pandemic and Beyond: the Arts and Humanities Contribution to Covid Research and Recovery (1:20 – 1:30pm)
Presented by:
Pascale Aebischer, Professor of Shakespeare and Early Modern Performance Studies, University of Exeter and PI of The Pandemic and Beyond: the Arts and Humanities Contribution to Covid Research and Recovery, University of Exeter.
Case study 2: Place-making, diversity and co-production: making visible the layers of London (1:30 – 1:40pm)
Presented by:
Justin Colston, Senior Lecturer at Institute of Historical Research, University of London.
Q & A / Discussion (1:40 - 1:55pm)
Closing remarks (1:55 - 2pm)
ABOUT LRaPP:
London Research and Policy Partnership (LRaPP) is a new partnership aimed at promoting greater synergy between London government and the academic research community.
The Partnership is evolving among movements bringing universities and local communities, cities and regions closer together - the ‘civic universities agenda’. It encourages universities to use their expertise and organisational resources to address pressing public policy challenges.
There are many examples of London's academics and public sector working together. Yet, most of these relationships develop in an ad hoc way. LRaPP takes a systematic approach through proactive and sustained engagement between the university and government sectors.
London Strategy and Policy Network
This network brings together people working in policy & strategy working in local government across London to learn new insights on cross-cutting issues and new methods in how to develop insight, policy, strategy & change.
This helps them support their organisations make sense of how to tackle issues which cut across various services and that require a whole system approach across local places to tackle.
How can humanities research contribute to policy 1Noel Hatch
There is always a danger that the humanities are overlooked in favour of the social sciences or ‘hard’ sciences in research-policy engagement, when the former have an important role to play.
The session will provide case studies and a facilitated discussion to better understand the potential implications and challenges for policymakers of engaging with humanities researchers.
The London Strategy and Policy Network and the London Research and Policy Partnership invite you to join a session to explore the contributions that humanities research can make to policy by bringing together humanities researchers and policymakers from across the capital and beyond.
Welcome and introduction (1:00 – 1:10pm)
Chaired by:
Professor Ben Rogers, Professor of Practice, University of London & Bloomberg Fellow to LSE Cities
Overview: How can humanists and policymakers work together? Benefits and opportunities of humanities research and policy engagement (1:10 – 1:20pm)
Presented by:
Jo Fox, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Research & Engagement) & Dean, School of Advanced Study, University of London.
Case study 1: Lessons from ‘The Pandemic and Beyond: the Arts and Humanities Contribution to Covid Research and Recovery (1:20 – 1:30pm)
Presented by:
Pascale Aebischer, Professor of Shakespeare and Early Modern Performance Studies, University of Exeter and PI of The Pandemic and Beyond: the Arts and Humanities Contribution to Covid Research and Recovery, University of Exeter.
Case study 2: Place-making, diversity and co-production: making visible the layers of London (1:30 – 1:40pm)
Presented by:
Justin Colston, Senior Lecturer at Institute of Historical Research, University of London.
Q & A / Discussion (1:40 - 1:55pm)
Closing remarks (1:55 - 2pm)
ABOUT LRaPP:
London Research and Policy Partnership (LRaPP) is a new partnership aimed at promoting greater synergy between London government and the academic research community.
The Partnership is evolving among movements bringing universities and local communities, cities and regions closer together - the ‘civic universities agenda’. It encourages universities to use their expertise and organisational resources to address pressing public policy challenges.
There are many examples of London's academics and public sector working together. Yet, most of these relationships develop in an ad hoc way. LRaPP takes a systematic approach through proactive and sustained engagement between the university and government sectors.
London Strategy and Policy Network
This network brings together people working in policy & strategy working in local government across London to learn new insights on cross-cutting issues and new methods in how to develop insight, policy, strategy & change.
This helps them support their organisations make sense of how to tackle issues which cut across various services and that require a whole system approach across local places to tackle.
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale war
Newham Resident Insight
1. Resident Insight for Newham
1. Priorities for residents
2. Satisfaction
3. Cohesion & participation
2. 1. Priorities for residents
Priorities in 2020
Priorities by
neighbourhood 2019-21
Priorities for young
people in 2021
We compare how priorities have
evolved for residents between
2019 and now at a borough wide
and neighbourhood level, and with
a special focus on young people.
5. Priorities for residents by each neighbourhood in
2021
Environment Safety Culture Cleanliness Environment Public Spaces Public Spaces Environment Biodiversity
Safety Youth Activities Public Spaces
Cleanliness Safety Public Spaces Cleanliness Safety Public Spaces
Safety Environment Public Spaces
Cleanliness Environment Public Spaces
8. 2. Satisfaction with the area & council
Satisfaction with the
local area
Satisfaction with the
council
Improvement of
services
Satisfaction by tenants
& leaseholders
We compare how our residents’
satisfaction with the local area and
the council has evolved since 2020
and what areas it has improved in
and where there is a need to
improve, with a particular focus on
our tenants & leaseholders.
9. Satisfaction with the local area from 2019-21
57% 53%
60%
81% 77% 76% 81% 74%
65%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
78%
80%
79%
84%
86%
88%
84%
88%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
73% 70% 75%
87% 86%
79% 84% 85%
76%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Satisfaction by all residents (2019-20) Satisfaction by tenants (2020-21)
Satisfaction by leaseholders (2020-21)
Newham Survey not carried out in 2020, so only satisfaction data from tenants & leaseholders from Housing Survey
10. Areas of satisfaction & concern for both the local
area and the council at the start of 2020
11. Perceptions of many services have improved
% change
from 2018
+12*
+5*
-
+3*
+1
+3
+3*
+15*
+14*
+16*
+12*
65%
89%
48%
83%
2018-19 2020-21
% Responses to Stage 1 Complaints within set timescales
% Responses to Members within set timescales
12. Prioritising what areas tenants want improved
Slide 12
Importance of
aspect of
service (%)
Need to improve aspect of service (%)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Taking views
into account
Value for
money for rent
Neighbourhood
as a place to live
Dealing with anti-
social behaviour
Keeping tenants informed
Repairs and maintenance
Overall quality of the
home
Average
13. Prioritising what areas leaseholders want improved
Slide 13
Need to improve aspect of service (%)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Taking leaseholder’s
views into account
Neighbourhood as a place to live
Repairs and maintenance (of
communal areas)
Value for money for
service charge
Importance of
aspect of service
(%)
Average
Keeping
leaseholder’s
informed
Dealing with anti-social behaviour
14. 3. Cohesion & participation
Engagement between
residents & the
council
Democratic & civic
participation
Social connections &
peer to peer support
Insights on racism,
inequality &
disproportionality
We outline what residents most
want improved in terms of
engagement and what issues
they’d most like to get involved in,
as well how our residents’ ability
to count on each other has
evolved, with a particular focus on
inclusion & cohesion
15. Insights on what residents want the council
to priorities for better engagement
Q9. Which three of these are you personally most concerned about in your local area?
NQ44. The council is thinking about a number of ways to strengthen the local economy. Looking at this list, which do you think should be the council's top 3 priorities?
The top voted priorities for the whole borough were Environment, Community Safety, Green spaces and Parks, Inclusive and Improved indoor and outdoor spaces and Sustainable Development, Nature and Biodiversity.
Phase 1 started place in April, with a focus on local priority ideas. These ideas were submitted onto the Co-create platform during the first assembly events as well as at any time up to the deadline of 3rd May.
Phase 2, over 1,000 residents voted on their top 3 priorities, announced on May 25th and a call out for project applications opened.
Phase 3 Working Groups are now shortlisting and assessing approximately 200 proposals.
Phase 1: Over 1,100 participants took part in the 16 Community Assemblies held across April, approximately 27% were new participants who attended a Community Assembly for the first time
The number of users signed up to the platform since March increased by approximately 600 giving a total of 1,499 registered users
During phase 1 of engagement, over 1,100 submissions of priority topics were submitted on the platform across the eight neighbourhoods
The top 5 emerging themes on the platform were around: Public spaces and buildings, Health and welfare, Community development, Social inclusion, Safety
The Community Assemblies process has a lot of elements to it that has stretched the functionality of the online engagement tool, however the developers are working with the council to upgrade and develop their platform to meet Newham's needs.
Over 100 residents applied to be part of the Working Group process.
Currently 188 residents, council officers, Cllrs and stakeholders form the eight Community Assembly Working Groups for this cycle.
24 active Cllrs are involved in the Working Group.
The Working Groups have been involved with shortlisting of priorities and screening / scoring stage 1 and 2 project applications to put projects forward to the voting round.
The group will is responsible for monitoring the delivery of community projects from August 2021.
“It is good to see the council and residents having conversations and working together on this platform, to improve areas of Newham”.
"The event was an eye opener it terms of Council's objectives to engage with and involve local communities to help shape and develop vital services and initiatives”
“It's good to see neighbours and hear as well as share views, so often we mix with the same circles or see the same views on social media. The assemblies bring the community together”
“The Community Assemblies are such a great idea. It was really good that so many people took part which can only mean that we are all very keen to be involved in positive change for where we live!”
Phase 2:
The top voted priorities for the whole borough were Environment, Community Safety, Green spaces and Parks, Inclusive and Improved indoor and outdoor spaces and Sustainable Development, Nature and Biodiversity.
Phase 3: Where we are now
Working groups are currently reviewing and scoring applications and will also be developing some project proposals.
2,249 users now registered on Newham co-create (66% increase since phase 1).
206 project ideas and 376 comments received on co-create platform.
193 stage 1 application of project proposals received.
150 applications are anticipated to progress onto stage 2.
Service improvements are being filtered out and passed onto the appropriate service areas.
Next steps
Phase 3
Working Groups continue to score Stage 2 applications
Phase 4
Second round of Community Assembly meetings from 5 to 15 July
Phase 5
Local people to vote on projects for up to £100K from 16 to 26 July
Phase 6
Delivery of projects commences August 2021
Autumn
Community assembly progress report to be presented at Cabinet in October 2021
The next round of Community Assemblies will be held across the first two weeks of July on Zoom and will be an opportunity for local residents to hear about projects that will be going forward to the participatory budgeting phase and to also learn about how to vote for the projects online.
Community cohesion, people are coming out of isolation but communities need support to come back even stronger
There is a chance we may not be able to cope in the future
Recovery: How do we help ensure all communities in Newham recover from the impact of the pandemic? (Time to Talk)
Feeling tired, lost a lot of people, George Floyd’s murder has increased the speed of outlining racism
Mental health has been affected due to loss of family and loved one, it's important to address and provide support
Isolation that people have experienced have been amplified by the use of technology. Those who don’t have technology may not recover quickly. How can we help those who don't have appropriate support
Elderly family members have shown resilience, despite being left alone. The impact has been significant and more vulnerable people may be left along for longer
Working with the NHS to support people in the community and what the model should be for that and finding ways to understand residents better
The impact on children with COVID-19, it has affected their health
Specific services for the community are important
Finance will be a key issue for many residents
Huge impact on the education system and the children.
Resilience in the community, although people have been lost, should be continued
The issue of resourcing is important, there is a lot to do, in regards to furlough, job loss, PTSD, there needs to be clear policy to understand what is the key to solve this problem
People have looked inward to find solutions but we need resources to support people. There isn't just one cure for all •
Arts have a valuable role in mirroring our feelings and giving people support so that they can feel better and move forward
People are concerned with mixing in larger groups, we need to find ways of engaging people into soft leisure, getting people confident to move forward and uplift the community
Helping people emotionally, physical support is very important
Depending on what is in our power to help people, creating opportunities for those to have a proper living wage job, doing things to create policies, having a dialogue to understand what will help people with finding jobs
Tenants in 2021 living in Beckton (90%) and Canning Town and Custom House (81%) are significantly more likely to be satisfied with their neighbourhood as a place to live than overall, whereas tenants living in Manor Park (65%) are significantly less likely to express satisfaction.
Q7. Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your local area as a place to live?
Satisfaction with how the council runs things remains high at 78%. More residents feel that the council provides value for money (76%) and perceptions of many of the services provided have improved.
In particular, residents are more likely to have a positive view of the cleanliness of the local area: fewer feel dropped litter is a problem and there is a more positive view of the street cleaning service than last year.
Views of parks and open spaces have also improved significantly: more residents than in 2018 and 2017 give a positive view of the overall quality, cleanliness, security and play areas.
Significantly more residents feel that LBN keeps them well informed (across a range of measures) and more feel that the council involves residents and is responsive.
Newham Residents Survey, October 2019-January 2020, Newham Council
Priority 1: Making Newham the Best Place for Children and Families
Priority 2: Building communities
Priority 3: A strong and inclusive economy
Priority 4: An environment for all
Priority 5: Improving the quality of life
Priority 6: An effective and innovative council
Agreement that the council provides value for money is the biggest driver of overall satisfaction with how the council runs things
Feeling that the council is efficient and well run, and trusting people in the neighbourhood, are both associated with higher levels of trust in the council
Long term trends show that residents are increasingly finding the council is making the local area a better place to live
Long term trends also indicate people feel the council is efficient and well run, provides good value for money and listens to the concerns of residents and responds quickly, and that is better involving them in decision making
Users of services tend to be more satisfied compared with the overall population
Views of the local health service and adult social services are generally good and have improved
Crime and ASB remains residents’ biggest local concern, and more residents are worried about falling victim to crime compared to 2018. There has also been a decline in the proportion who feel safe when outdoors in the area.
While most residents have somebody to rely on, nearly a third (31%) do not.
While certain measures of community cohesion have remained strong (or improved), this year fewer residents feel that the local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together; however the result is very similar to 2016.
More residents report that the council is hard to get through to on the phone than in 2018.
Newham Residents Survey, October 2019-January 2020, Newham Council
Priority 1: Making Newham the Best Place for Children and Families
Priority 2: Building communities
Priority 3: A strong and inclusive economy
Priority 4: An environment for all
Priority 5: Improving the quality of life
Priority 6: An effective and innovative council
Q47. What is your opinion of...?
Repairs is a tenant priority and a key driver of satisfaction, with satisfaction declining by 7%, but in context of Covid where only emergency repairs carried out
Key areas where satisfaction has particularly declined are the way their landlord deals with complaints (49%), general condition of the property (60%) and the proportion of tenants satisfied their views are being taken into account (56%) have fallen significantly by 16, 13 and 10%
this survey was carried out at the end of 2020 and beginning of 2021, in the midst of the pandemic, at a time when services were restricted and we were only able to focus on managing core services. This year, alongside managing core services we have a new Resident Involvement Team in place, have adjusted our KPIs, are focussing on satisfaction and customer service, and have introduced transactional surveys. Whilst it’s clear that towards the end of lockdown satisfaction was hampered, data from our transactional surveys shows that satisfaction and service delivery improved at the start of 2021.
Repairs is a tenant priority and a key driver of satisfaction. Tenant satisfaction with how their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance (56%) declined significantly by 7 percentage points since 2019 (63% in 2019) to the lowest level in recent years. The main reason for dissatisfaction was ‘nothing happening/no response to the problem’. This is in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic where only emergency and essential repairs were carried out April to September 2020.
Satisfaction with services provided by their landlord has seen a general decline in 2020. In particular, satisfaction with the way their landlord deals with complaints (49%) and satisfaction with support provided to vulnerable tenants (61%) have fallen significantly by 16 and 5 percentage points respectively since 2019.
Three fifths (60%) expressed satisfaction with the general condition of their property which is significantly lower by 13 percentage points when compared with last year (73% in 2019).
The proportion of tenants satisfied that their views are being taken into account also decreased to 56% (a significant decrease of 10 percentage points) – the lowest level in recent years.
Repairs and maintenance remains an important service for leaseholders but is replaced by value for money for service charge as the most important.
Key areas where satisfaction has particularly declined are the proportion who think their landlord provides poor value for money (62% and +27%), who feel services have got worse (38% and +22%) proportion who are satisfied with the condition of the exterior of their building (50% and -18%), and satisfaction with the way the landlord deals with repairs and maintenance in communal areas (36% and -16%)
Around half (47%) of leaseholders are satisfied with the way their landlord communicates with them.
The proportion of leaseholders who feel services have stayed the same (55%) over the last 12 months reduced by 25 percentage points since 2019 (80% in 2019). The proportion who feel services have got better (7%) and worse (38%) have both risen significantly, by 3 and 22 percentage points respectively.
Repairs and maintenance remains an important service for leaseholders but is replaced by value for money for service charge as the most important. Satisfaction with the way the landlord deals with repairs and maintenance in communal areas decreased significantly by 16 percentage points since 2019 to 37%. This is in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic where only compliance and building safety work were carried out in communal areas.
More leaseholders think the service charge provides poor value for money (62%) than good value for money (23%). The proportion who think the service charge provides poor value for money has increased significantly by 27 points when compared with the 2019 survey (35% in 2019).
The proportion of leaseholders who are satisfied with the condition of the exterior of their building (50%) has declined significantly by 18 percentage points and is comparable with the 2016 figure.
47% of leaseholders are satisfied with the overall condition of the communal areas in their building.
From Democracy Commission, 2020
To inform the recommendations for the Democracy Commission, residents were engaged on the following topics:
Involving residents in local decision making: Residents wanted the council and councillors being more visible, getting out and listening to residents and to involve them more in decisions and in developing services, communicate in a more transparent way and enable better feedback and accountability
Using digital tools for local democracy: Council should better use digital tools to communicate and share information and promotion and outreach, give local people ways of speaking up online, and tackle barriers to digital exclusion
Working in partnership with residents: The most important areas that residents thought the council should work with them on were public spaces, youth services, community safety, housing & homelessness, environment & climate change, planning & regeneration, traffic & parking and local businesses. They wanted greater co-production and empowering bottom up action
Giving equal voice to all: Residents wanted improvements in reporting issues, accessing services and even making routine contact with the Council and for the Council, and in particular getting feedback from the Council, and issue such as not just listening to the loudest voices, tackling language & disability barriers to getting involved, using a range of formats to engage, reaching out through networks
Supporting communities: supporting what community members are already doing, listening more to residents and providing education & training on local democracy & participation, raise the profile of councillors and supporting community centres & activities
Choosing the best structures for local decision making: Improved transparency & scrutiny
Phase 1 started place in April, with a focus on local priority ideas. These ideas were submitted onto the Co-create platform during the first assembly events as well as at any time up to the deadline of 3rd May.
Phase 2, over 1,000 residents voted on their top 3 priorities, announced on May 25th and a call out for project applications opened.
Phase 3 Working Groups are now shortlisting and assessing approximately 200 proposals.
Phase 1: Over 1,100 participants took part in the 16 Community Assemblies held across April, approximately 27% were new participants who attended a Community Assembly for the first time
The number of users signed up to the platform since March increased by approximately 600 giving a total of 1,499 registered users
During phase 1 of engagement, over 1,100 submissions of priority topics were submitted on the platform across the eight neighbourhoods
The top 5 emerging themes on the platform were around: Public spaces and buildings, Health and welfare, Community development, Social inclusion, Safety
The Community Assemblies process has a lot of elements to it that has stretched the functionality of the online engagement tool, however the developers are working with the council to upgrade and develop their platform to meet Newham's needs.
Over 100 residents applied to be part of the Working Group process.
Currently 188 residents, council officers, Cllrs and stakeholders form the eight Community Assembly Working Groups for this cycle.
24 active Cllrs are involved in the Working Group.
The Working Groups have been involved with shortlisting of priorities and screening / scoring stage 1 and 2 project applications to put projects forward to the voting round.
The group will is responsible for monitoring the delivery of community projects from August 2021.
“It is good to see the council and residents having conversations and working together on this platform, to improve areas of Newham”.
"The event was an eye opener it terms of Council's objectives to engage with and involve local communities to help shape and develop vital services and initiatives”
“It's good to see neighbours and hear as well as share views, so often we mix with the same circles or see the same views on social media. The assemblies bring the community together”
“The Community Assemblies are such a great idea. It was really good that so many people took part which can only mean that we are all very keen to be involved in positive change for where we live!”
Phase 2:
The top voted priorities for the whole borough were Environment, Community Safety, Green spaces and Parks, Inclusive and Improved indoor and outdoor spaces and Sustainable Development, Nature and Biodiversity.
Phase 3: Where we are now
Working groups are currently reviewing and scoring applications and will also be developing some project proposals.
2,249 users now registered on Newham co-create (66% increase since phase 1).
206 project ideas and 376 comments received on co-create platform.
193 stage 1 application of project proposals received.
150 applications are anticipated to progress onto stage 2.
Service improvements are being filtered out and passed onto the appropriate service areas.
Next steps
Phase 3
Working Groups continue to score Stage 2 applications
Phase 4
Second round of Community Assembly meetings from 5 to 15 July
Phase 5
Local people to vote on projects for up to £100K from 16 to 26 July
Phase 6
Delivery of projects commences August 2021
Autumn
Community assembly progress report to be presented at Cabinet in October 2021
The next round of Community Assemblies will be held across the first two weeks of July on Zoom and will be an opportunity for local residents to hear about projects that will be going forward to the participatory budgeting phase and to also learn about how to vote for the projects online.
Q56. From which, if any, of the following sources of information do you currently find out about what Newham Council is doing?
"Treat others how we would like to be treated". Life is too short and precious to waste even a second of it hurting others, whether through words or actions.
“I feel very comfortable challenging inequality, racism and disproportionality in my friendship groups, but not in all of my networks. I feel very uncomfortable about challenging these issues if I am the only person of colour in a given space, especially as a woman of colour.”
NQ17. Do you have a spouse, partner, family member or friend to rely on if you have a serious problem?
Q12. How often do you meet socially with friends, relatives or work colleagues?
The likelihood of socialising each week is linked to disability and age
NQ17. Do you have a spouse, partner, family member or friend to rely on if you have a serious problem?
Q12. How often do you meet socially with friends, relatives or work colleagues?
The likelihood of socialising each week is linked to disability and age