Basic Income Plus as an Alternative to UK Welfare ReformCitizen Network
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform and UBI Lab Sheffield spoke to members of Sheffield's Disability Hub, in partnership with Disability Sheffield about the potential of Basic Income Plus to benefit disabled people and replace the ESA system.
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform and the UBI Lab Network set out the case for Universal Basic income to the AGM of Sheffield Church Action on Poverty. He argued that UBI was going to continue to be the main alternative to the main broken social security system and that Christians should support it.
- The document discusses Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a potential remedy for issues facing modern America. It defines UBI as a guaranteed, regular payout to all citizens that is universal, basic, and without restrictions on how it is spent.
- Proponents argue UBI could help address problems like automation displacing jobs, high student loan debt loads, and lack of funding for passion careers. Alaska's Permanent Fund that pays annual dividends to state residents is presented as a successful case study.
- Objections about inflation, costs, and reduced work incentive are addressed, pointing to Alaska's experience and a study in Uganda showing basic income recipients working more and having higher incomes later. The document estimates U
Simon Duffy and Caroline Richardson of UBI Lab Disability talked about the need for UBI+ system - a system which reflects the reality of what people need. This talk was given at the 2021 World Congress on Basic Income.
This talk was given to the Poverty Network at Dewsbury Minster to explore what is changing in the welfare state and what real welfare reforms might the Church wish to support.
These slides are from a talk Dr Simon Duffy of Citizen Network gave to Café Economique in Leeds, making the case for basic income. The argument set out is that UBI is one necessary part of a range of reforms necessary to support citizenship and strengthen community life. This talk preceded a (rather fiery) debate with Anna Coote of NEF who argued against UBI.
Talk by Dr Simon Duffy for Citizen Advice Derbyshire Districts, June 7th 2017. He explores the reality poverty is mitigated and created by the political system and particularly examines tax-benefit changes between 1997 and 2014.
The document discusses the choice between Universal Credit (UC) and Universal Basic Income (UBI) in the UK. It argues that UC undermines social security and imposes social control, while UBI could help build a society where everyone's basic needs are met. The movement for UBI is part of global efforts for social justice. Going forward, the conflict may be between retaining UC or adopting UBI. Achieving change will likely require social pressure around new ideas like UBI.
Basic Income Plus as an Alternative to UK Welfare ReformCitizen Network
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform and UBI Lab Sheffield spoke to members of Sheffield's Disability Hub, in partnership with Disability Sheffield about the potential of Basic Income Plus to benefit disabled people and replace the ESA system.
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform and the UBI Lab Network set out the case for Universal Basic income to the AGM of Sheffield Church Action on Poverty. He argued that UBI was going to continue to be the main alternative to the main broken social security system and that Christians should support it.
- The document discusses Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a potential remedy for issues facing modern America. It defines UBI as a guaranteed, regular payout to all citizens that is universal, basic, and without restrictions on how it is spent.
- Proponents argue UBI could help address problems like automation displacing jobs, high student loan debt loads, and lack of funding for passion careers. Alaska's Permanent Fund that pays annual dividends to state residents is presented as a successful case study.
- Objections about inflation, costs, and reduced work incentive are addressed, pointing to Alaska's experience and a study in Uganda showing basic income recipients working more and having higher incomes later. The document estimates U
Simon Duffy and Caroline Richardson of UBI Lab Disability talked about the need for UBI+ system - a system which reflects the reality of what people need. This talk was given at the 2021 World Congress on Basic Income.
This talk was given to the Poverty Network at Dewsbury Minster to explore what is changing in the welfare state and what real welfare reforms might the Church wish to support.
These slides are from a talk Dr Simon Duffy of Citizen Network gave to Café Economique in Leeds, making the case for basic income. The argument set out is that UBI is one necessary part of a range of reforms necessary to support citizenship and strengthen community life. This talk preceded a (rather fiery) debate with Anna Coote of NEF who argued against UBI.
Talk by Dr Simon Duffy for Citizen Advice Derbyshire Districts, June 7th 2017. He explores the reality poverty is mitigated and created by the political system and particularly examines tax-benefit changes between 1997 and 2014.
The document discusses the choice between Universal Credit (UC) and Universal Basic Income (UBI) in the UK. It argues that UC undermines social security and imposes social control, while UBI could help build a society where everyone's basic needs are met. The movement for UBI is part of global efforts for social justice. Going forward, the conflict may be between retaining UC or adopting UBI. Achieving change will likely require social pressure around new ideas like UBI.
Dr Simon Duffy gave this talk at a seminar organised by the Erasmus+ funded project the SDS Network which shares expertise on self-directed support globally. The talk explains why human and disability rights support a shift towards Self-Directed Support.
Briefing for Opposition Day Debate - 10th July 2013Citizen Network
An overview of the cumulative impact of UK government policies on disabled people. Prepared as a briefing for MPs for the Opposition Day Debate in the House of Commons on 10th July 2013. Supporting: the Campaign for a Fair Society, Pat's Petition and the WOW Campaign.
Jed Smith, Managing Director, Quantitative Research
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
North Carolina Real Estate Summit
Cary, North Carolina
July 16, 2013
This event launched our state of the nation report, UK Poverty 2017.
The most up to date picture on poverty in the UK today
Keynote address: Rt Hon Robert Halfon MP, Chair of the Education Select Committee
The research assesses the progress the UK is making in reducing poverty and tackling its underlying drivers.
It looks at how a generation are living in poverty in the prime of life, because the routes to building a decent, secure life are increasingly out of reach.
The launch also included a panel discussion to explore how British politics responds to the challenges set out in the report.
The report, which has been produced in-house by the JRF Analysis Unit for the first time, examines poverty rates in the UK, and looks at how figures have changed over the past two decades.
Speakers Include:
Lucy Fisher (chair)
Senior Political Correspondent
The Times
Campbell Robb
Chief Executive
Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Helen Barnard
Head of Analysis
Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Rt Hon Robert Halfon MP
Chair of the Education Select Committee
Nancy Kelley
Deputy Chief Executive
NatCen
Cllr Claire Kober
Leader
London Borough of Haringey & Chair of London Councils
Link to full Keynote Speech - https://www.jrf.org.uk/uk-poverty-2017-ladders-opportunity-keynote-speech-robert-halfon-mp
Link to Full report - https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/uk-poverty-2017
Basic Income and People with Learning DifficultiesCitizen Network
Simon Duffy talked to members of Learning Disability England (LDE) about basic income and basic income plus (UBI+). These slides explain the key ideas and open up a discussion about the value of basic income to people with learning difficulties.
This document provides 8 ways to reframe poverty and open public minds to solving poverty issues. It begins by explaining the importance of framing and cultural models in shaping public sentiment. It then outlines the following strategies: 1) Understand cultural models of poverty; 2) Focus on poverty rather than benefits or the economy as the issue; 3) Connect with values like compassion to shift thinking; 4) Use credible messengers aligned with the audience; 5) Employ metaphors that shift thinking; 6) Use examples and stories rather than just data; 7) Position benefits as a solution rather than the problem; 8) Tell compelling stories. The overall aim is to strategically frame poverty issues in a way that engages the public and g
Income and social inequality continue to be problems in Canada. Income inequality refers to the uneven distribution of income in a country and has implications for social outcomes like crime and life satisfaction. Social inequality involves unequal chances and opportunities based on social status. Some statistics on inequality in Canada include that it has increased over the past 20 years, with the richest group increasing its share of total income while the poorest and middle groups lost share. Income inequality is growing faster in Canada than in most peer countries. Too much inequality is bad for society and the economy.
This document discusses problems facing state pension schemes and potential solutions. It outlines the history and purpose of programs like Social Security. Currently, state pensions face fiscal imbalance as lifespans rise, birth rates fall, and wages stagnate. This puts pressure on pay-as-you-go systems where current workers fund current retirees. Proposed solutions include tax hikes, benefit cuts, raising retirement ages, or shifting to fully funded individual accounts. However, fully funded systems also carry risks around investment choices, costs, and legacy debts. Overall, the document examines challenges facing state pensions and debates between reform options.
The Minimum Income Standard (MIS) represents what families need for an acceptable standard of living, according to members of the public.
This analysis compares the living standards of different household types to MIS in 2010 and 2022.It also breaks down the effect of different policies on household incomes in 2022.
View the extended version of this presentation: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/media/wwwlboroacuk/content/crsp/downloads/reports/How%20is%20public%20policy%20affecting%20peoples%20ability%20to%20make%20ends%20meet.pdf
also published:
Households below a Minimum Income Standard 2008/09 to 2015/16
Report by:Matt Padley, Laura Valadez and Donald Hirsch.
https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/households-below-minimum-income-standard-200809-201516
JRF blog: www.jrf.org.uk/blog/budget-must-improve-living-standards-struggling-families
This talk for Sheffield's Citizen Advice Burea explores the lies behind the UK Government's account of welfare reform and offers thoughts on what real welfare reform might look like.
The document discusses income inequality and the Occupy Wall Street movement. It defines income inequality as the uneven distribution of income among a population. In the U.S., the gap between rich and poor has grown significantly over the past 30 years. Occupy Wall Street protested in 2011 against social and economic inequality and the control large financial institutions have. The movement drew attention to the fact that the top 20% of Americans control over half the country's wealth. Income inequality is a global issue and the gap between rich and poor continues to widen both in developed and developing nations.
Whose Welfare State Now? - Adrian SinfieldOxfam GB
Professor Adrian Sinfield, Emeritus Professor of Social Policy at the University of Edinburgh, talks about the welfare state.
Stephen Boyd, Assistant Secretary of the Scottish Trade Unions Congress, talks about how the Scottish economy works.
The Whose Economy? seminars, organised by Oxfam Scotland and the University of the West of Scotland, brought together experts to look at recent changes in the Scottish economy and their impact on Scotland's most vulnerable communities.
Held over winter and spring 2010-11 in Edinburgh, Inverness, Glasgow and Stirling, the series posed the question of what economy is being created in Scotland and, specifically, for whom?
To find out more and view other Whose Economy? papers, presentations and videos visit:
http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/whose-economy-seminar-series-winter-2010-spring-2011/
1. The document analyzes the political stability of pension reforms that transition defined benefit systems to partially funded defined contribution systems in Poland.
2. Through an overlapping generations model calibrated to Poland, it finds that abolishing the funded pillar and shifting back to a purely PAYG system would have majority political support at every vote, as voters prefer lower taxes even if it means lower future pension benefits.
3. Contrary to some prior literature, the model does not find a coalition forming between low-productivity workers and retirees to preserve the status quo. Introducing altruism toward future generations increases stability of the reform.
This document discusses how civil society organizations can respond to the economic recession and help renew society. It notes that many organizations have seen falling income due to the recession. It suggests that organizations focus on their mission, plan for different scenarios, communicate honestly with staff and trustees, manage finances carefully, and strengthen strategic relationships. Finally, it argues that organizations can help build a fairer, more sustainable society by empowering local voices and action and moving beyond traditional state/market solutions.
Childrens Hospices And The Recession 100129Karl Wilding
The document discusses the impact of the recession on the third sector in the UK. It finds that around a quarter of organizations reported significant concerns due to the recession. Charitable giving dipped by 11% in 2008-2009. While many organizations expect no change in income in the short term, perceptions of the medium term are more pessimistic. Cuts to government funding are expected but will not impact all sectors uniformly. Collaboration and reconfiguration appear necessary strategies for many organizations to weather the challenges.
The document discusses political support for social security systems and reforms from defined benefit (DB) to funded defined contribution (FDC) plans. It reviews literature on three factors influencing political support: 1) existence of intergenerational transfers, 2) size of transfers, and 3) political economy of social contracts. The literature concludes social security becomes politically stable if initially feasible. The document then models a pension reform from DB to a hybrid DB-FDC system in Poland, examining the distribution of costs and gains and whether the FDC pillar becomes politically stable over time through majority voting.
Malcolm Torry on Christian Case for Basic IncomeCitizen Network
Malcolm Torry outlined the arguments of his book Citizen's Basic Income - a Christian Social Policy - at event hosted by Basic Income UK and the Centre for Welfare Reform.
The roots of our crisis presentation to the thunderbird school of global mana...Prabhu Guptara
Explores globlal trends to identify the roots of the current crisis, as well as to promote some possible solutions which have the potential to carry the day.
There are three main methods for redistributing income discussed in the document:
1) In-kind transfers such as food stamps and Medicaid provide direct transfers of goods and services to lower income individuals.
2) Cash transfers like TANF provide direct cash payments but can reduce incentives to work.
3) A negative income tax provides cash payments to lower income individuals while imposing taxes on higher incomes, incentivizing work more than traditional welfare programs. However, it is politically challenging and could reduce work incentives.
Dr Simon Duffy gave this talk at a seminar organised by the Erasmus+ funded project the SDS Network which shares expertise on self-directed support globally. The talk explains why human and disability rights support a shift towards Self-Directed Support.
Briefing for Opposition Day Debate - 10th July 2013Citizen Network
An overview of the cumulative impact of UK government policies on disabled people. Prepared as a briefing for MPs for the Opposition Day Debate in the House of Commons on 10th July 2013. Supporting: the Campaign for a Fair Society, Pat's Petition and the WOW Campaign.
Jed Smith, Managing Director, Quantitative Research
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
North Carolina Real Estate Summit
Cary, North Carolina
July 16, 2013
This event launched our state of the nation report, UK Poverty 2017.
The most up to date picture on poverty in the UK today
Keynote address: Rt Hon Robert Halfon MP, Chair of the Education Select Committee
The research assesses the progress the UK is making in reducing poverty and tackling its underlying drivers.
It looks at how a generation are living in poverty in the prime of life, because the routes to building a decent, secure life are increasingly out of reach.
The launch also included a panel discussion to explore how British politics responds to the challenges set out in the report.
The report, which has been produced in-house by the JRF Analysis Unit for the first time, examines poverty rates in the UK, and looks at how figures have changed over the past two decades.
Speakers Include:
Lucy Fisher (chair)
Senior Political Correspondent
The Times
Campbell Robb
Chief Executive
Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Helen Barnard
Head of Analysis
Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Rt Hon Robert Halfon MP
Chair of the Education Select Committee
Nancy Kelley
Deputy Chief Executive
NatCen
Cllr Claire Kober
Leader
London Borough of Haringey & Chair of London Councils
Link to full Keynote Speech - https://www.jrf.org.uk/uk-poverty-2017-ladders-opportunity-keynote-speech-robert-halfon-mp
Link to Full report - https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/uk-poverty-2017
Basic Income and People with Learning DifficultiesCitizen Network
Simon Duffy talked to members of Learning Disability England (LDE) about basic income and basic income plus (UBI+). These slides explain the key ideas and open up a discussion about the value of basic income to people with learning difficulties.
This document provides 8 ways to reframe poverty and open public minds to solving poverty issues. It begins by explaining the importance of framing and cultural models in shaping public sentiment. It then outlines the following strategies: 1) Understand cultural models of poverty; 2) Focus on poverty rather than benefits or the economy as the issue; 3) Connect with values like compassion to shift thinking; 4) Use credible messengers aligned with the audience; 5) Employ metaphors that shift thinking; 6) Use examples and stories rather than just data; 7) Position benefits as a solution rather than the problem; 8) Tell compelling stories. The overall aim is to strategically frame poverty issues in a way that engages the public and g
Income and social inequality continue to be problems in Canada. Income inequality refers to the uneven distribution of income in a country and has implications for social outcomes like crime and life satisfaction. Social inequality involves unequal chances and opportunities based on social status. Some statistics on inequality in Canada include that it has increased over the past 20 years, with the richest group increasing its share of total income while the poorest and middle groups lost share. Income inequality is growing faster in Canada than in most peer countries. Too much inequality is bad for society and the economy.
This document discusses problems facing state pension schemes and potential solutions. It outlines the history and purpose of programs like Social Security. Currently, state pensions face fiscal imbalance as lifespans rise, birth rates fall, and wages stagnate. This puts pressure on pay-as-you-go systems where current workers fund current retirees. Proposed solutions include tax hikes, benefit cuts, raising retirement ages, or shifting to fully funded individual accounts. However, fully funded systems also carry risks around investment choices, costs, and legacy debts. Overall, the document examines challenges facing state pensions and debates between reform options.
The Minimum Income Standard (MIS) represents what families need for an acceptable standard of living, according to members of the public.
This analysis compares the living standards of different household types to MIS in 2010 and 2022.It also breaks down the effect of different policies on household incomes in 2022.
View the extended version of this presentation: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/media/wwwlboroacuk/content/crsp/downloads/reports/How%20is%20public%20policy%20affecting%20peoples%20ability%20to%20make%20ends%20meet.pdf
also published:
Households below a Minimum Income Standard 2008/09 to 2015/16
Report by:Matt Padley, Laura Valadez and Donald Hirsch.
https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/households-below-minimum-income-standard-200809-201516
JRF blog: www.jrf.org.uk/blog/budget-must-improve-living-standards-struggling-families
This talk for Sheffield's Citizen Advice Burea explores the lies behind the UK Government's account of welfare reform and offers thoughts on what real welfare reform might look like.
The document discusses income inequality and the Occupy Wall Street movement. It defines income inequality as the uneven distribution of income among a population. In the U.S., the gap between rich and poor has grown significantly over the past 30 years. Occupy Wall Street protested in 2011 against social and economic inequality and the control large financial institutions have. The movement drew attention to the fact that the top 20% of Americans control over half the country's wealth. Income inequality is a global issue and the gap between rich and poor continues to widen both in developed and developing nations.
Whose Welfare State Now? - Adrian SinfieldOxfam GB
Professor Adrian Sinfield, Emeritus Professor of Social Policy at the University of Edinburgh, talks about the welfare state.
Stephen Boyd, Assistant Secretary of the Scottish Trade Unions Congress, talks about how the Scottish economy works.
The Whose Economy? seminars, organised by Oxfam Scotland and the University of the West of Scotland, brought together experts to look at recent changes in the Scottish economy and their impact on Scotland's most vulnerable communities.
Held over winter and spring 2010-11 in Edinburgh, Inverness, Glasgow and Stirling, the series posed the question of what economy is being created in Scotland and, specifically, for whom?
To find out more and view other Whose Economy? papers, presentations and videos visit:
http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/whose-economy-seminar-series-winter-2010-spring-2011/
1. The document analyzes the political stability of pension reforms that transition defined benefit systems to partially funded defined contribution systems in Poland.
2. Through an overlapping generations model calibrated to Poland, it finds that abolishing the funded pillar and shifting back to a purely PAYG system would have majority political support at every vote, as voters prefer lower taxes even if it means lower future pension benefits.
3. Contrary to some prior literature, the model does not find a coalition forming between low-productivity workers and retirees to preserve the status quo. Introducing altruism toward future generations increases stability of the reform.
This document discusses how civil society organizations can respond to the economic recession and help renew society. It notes that many organizations have seen falling income due to the recession. It suggests that organizations focus on their mission, plan for different scenarios, communicate honestly with staff and trustees, manage finances carefully, and strengthen strategic relationships. Finally, it argues that organizations can help build a fairer, more sustainable society by empowering local voices and action and moving beyond traditional state/market solutions.
Childrens Hospices And The Recession 100129Karl Wilding
The document discusses the impact of the recession on the third sector in the UK. It finds that around a quarter of organizations reported significant concerns due to the recession. Charitable giving dipped by 11% in 2008-2009. While many organizations expect no change in income in the short term, perceptions of the medium term are more pessimistic. Cuts to government funding are expected but will not impact all sectors uniformly. Collaboration and reconfiguration appear necessary strategies for many organizations to weather the challenges.
The document discusses political support for social security systems and reforms from defined benefit (DB) to funded defined contribution (FDC) plans. It reviews literature on three factors influencing political support: 1) existence of intergenerational transfers, 2) size of transfers, and 3) political economy of social contracts. The literature concludes social security becomes politically stable if initially feasible. The document then models a pension reform from DB to a hybrid DB-FDC system in Poland, examining the distribution of costs and gains and whether the FDC pillar becomes politically stable over time through majority voting.
Malcolm Torry on Christian Case for Basic IncomeCitizen Network
Malcolm Torry outlined the arguments of his book Citizen's Basic Income - a Christian Social Policy - at event hosted by Basic Income UK and the Centre for Welfare Reform.
The roots of our crisis presentation to the thunderbird school of global mana...Prabhu Guptara
Explores globlal trends to identify the roots of the current crisis, as well as to promote some possible solutions which have the potential to carry the day.
There are three main methods for redistributing income discussed in the document:
1) In-kind transfers such as food stamps and Medicaid provide direct transfers of goods and services to lower income individuals.
2) Cash transfers like TANF provide direct cash payments but can reduce incentives to work.
3) A negative income tax provides cash payments to lower income individuals while imposing taxes on higher incomes, incentivizing work more than traditional welfare programs. However, it is politically challenging and could reduce work incentives.
Dr Simon Duffy explores how to fully fund adult social care in England. This presentation was hosted by the Yorkshire branch of the Socialist Health Association at an event to explore radical and progressive ideas to reform the broken social care system.
The document discusses strategies to raise workforce participation and reduce welfare dependency in Australia. It argues that while training and education can help some groups like women rejoin the workforce, it may have limited impact for those with low IQ or skills, as many jobs now require minimum IQ levels or skills above what some groups can attain. It suggests two alternatives - creating more low-skilled, low-wage job opportunities through services, or accepting that conditional welfare will be a long-term reality for some with limited capabilities.
This document discusses fiscal policy in the United States in the context of rising inequality. It makes three key points:
1) Inequality in the US is high and growing, with the top 1% gaining significantly more income than the rest. Government can and should do more to promote equality of opportunity through public investment and insurance programs.
2) Public investment, such as in infrastructure and education, provides jobs and yields high economic returns that complement private sector growth. However, the US underinvests in these areas.
3) The US tax base is inadequate given spending needs. Moderate tax increases coupled with more progressive public spending could help address inequality without steep rate increases. Overall fiscal policy should consider both spending and
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform describes the reality of welfare reform and describes the harm it is doing to already disadvantaged groups. He proposes that there is a better version of welfare reform that has not yet been explored.
Transforming Support for Families with Multiple Disadvantages: Implementing a...Policy in Practice
Deven Ghelani, CEO and founder of Policy in Practice, presented at Public Policy Exchange's event on The Future of Troubled Families.
Deven spoke about Transforming Support for Families with Multiple Disadvantages: Implementing a “Whole Family Approach”. In particular, he covered the following two topics:
- Benefits, Employment and Housing: Supporting families to navigate services and find practical pathways to employment
- Sharing best practice: Discussing innovative strategies improving the lives of families with multiple disadvantages
To find out more about Policy in Practice's work in this area visit www.policyinpractice.co.uk, email hello@policyinpractice.co.uk or call 0330 088 9242.
Micro Economics Chapter 20 , The Distribution of Income by (Nouman Khilji)Noman Khilji
This chapter discusses income inequality and policies to reduce poverty. It finds that wealth and income are unequally distributed around the world. Various measures are used to quantify inequality like the Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient. However, measuring inequality is challenging due to issues like transitory versus permanent income. Governments aim to redistribute income through policies like minimum wages, social security programs, negative income taxes, and in-kind transfers to improve living standards. The goal is to help the poor escape poverty through work incentives and anti-poverty programs.
This document provides an overview of transfer payment programs like welfare and Social Security. It discusses how these programs work, their unintended consequences, and the tradeoffs involved. The major points covered are: transfer payments are provided by the government without an exchange of goods/services; the main recipients are the elderly and poor; these programs can discourage work; and there are dilemmas around balancing welfare eligibility, costs, and work incentives.
This document provides an overview of transfer payment programs like welfare and Social Security. It discusses how these programs work, their unintended consequences, and some of the tradeoffs involved. The major points covered are:
1) Transfer payments are distributed by the government to eligible recipients without requiring an exchange of goods or services. The main recipients are the elderly (via Social Security) and low-income families (via welfare).
2) These programs can discourage work by reducing the incentive to be employed. They may also influence behaviors like family size and retirement decisions.
3) Welfare programs face a dilemma between encouraging work and minimizing costs - strict rules may boost work but limit eligibility, while loose rules do the opposite.
4
1. The document discusses flaws in the current UK welfare system and proposals for reform, arguing that the system overly taxes and stigmatizes the poor.
2. It proposes an alternative "Family Security System" with a universal basic income, fair taxes for all, and a focus on supporting women and families.
3. Key recommendations include establishing legal rights to realize human rights principles, making the income security system universal, and shifting power back to local communities through personalized support systems.
This document summarizes the key points made in a presentation on creating a fair society in Northern Ireland. It notes that unprecedented cuts have targeted disabled people and those in poverty, with 58% of all cuts impacting these groups. It highlights that the poorest families pay the highest taxes and live on very little income. Despite legislation promoting rights and equality, these cuts are exacerbating inequality. The presentation calls for building an alliance to advocate for a vision of a society with equal rights and opportunities for all.
A Taxation and Benefits System to End Child Poverty - John DickieOxfam GB
John Dickie, head of the Child Poverty Action Group Scotland, talks about how a different taxation and benefits system can help end child poverty.
The Whose Economy? seminars, organised by Oxfam Scotland and the University of the West of Scotland, brought together experts to look at recent changes in the Scottish economy and their impact on Scotland's most vulnerable communities.
Held over winter and spring 2010-11 in Edinburgh, Inverness, Glasgow and Stirling, the series posed the question of what economy is being created in Scotland and, specifically, for whom?
To find out more and view other Whose Economy? papers, presentations and videos visit:
http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/whose-economy-seminar-series-winter-2010-spring-2011/
Slides from an APPG on Social Care public debate, in association with the Strategic Society Centre.
Date and time: 16.30-18.30, June 26th 2012
Location: Committee Room 18, House of Commons
Speakers at this event comprised:
James Lloyd, Director, The Strategic Society Centre
Paul Johnson, Director, IFS
Anita Charlesworth, Chief Economist, Nuffield Trust and former Director of Public Spending, HM Treasury
Caroline Abrahams, Director of External Affairs, Age UK
This document outlines key aspects of a universal basic income (UBI) proposal and discusses increased support for the idea during the COVID-19 pandemic. It defines UBI as an unconditional, universal cash benefit distributed regularly to individuals at a level sufficient to meet basic needs. The document examines how UBI could replace some existing welfare programs and addresses criticisms. It explores how the pandemic exposed inadequacies in work-based benefits and increased support across political ideologies by "universalizing" risk. Open questions remain around identifying participants and funding a real-world UBI system.
The document discusses income inequality and poverty in the United States. It examines how inequality is measured and has changed over time. Political philosophies like utilitarianism, liberalism, and libertarianism offer different views on the government's role in redistributing income. The document also analyzes policies aimed at reducing poverty, including minimum wage laws, welfare, negative income taxes, and in-kind transfers, as well as their potential impacts on work incentives.
These slides were generated as part of a Festival of Debate event to explore the possibility of developing a movement in Sheffield to test and develop a basic income pilot.
This document summarizes Peter Saunders' argument that widespread self-funding of services currently provided by the welfare state is both possible and desirable. It argues that rising incomes mean most people could afford to privately pay for services like healthcare, education and retirement if taxes were lower. While some redistribution would still be needed to support those unable to fully self-fund, allowing more self-funding could boost economic growth and individual empowerment while reducing costs and reliance on government. Key questions are whether adequate self-funding is possible and whether moving away from state provision towards self-funding models is economically and socially preferable.
Similar to A brief introduction to basic income (20)
Networked Energy: Energy independence for AlderneyCitizen Network
by Chris Cook and Marcus Saul, Island Power
As Research Fellows at the Institute for Strategy, Resilience and Security, at University College, London, Marcus Saul and Chris Cook researched and developed the Pacific Natural Grid resource resilience strategy.
Here they explain how Denmark has led the way in creating sustainable networks of community-based energy production and distribution.
This has been transformative for Denmark, enabling it to become independent from the oil and gas industry’s dominance. But it is also transformative for communities, who are now creating their own energy economies.
Dr Dave Beck gave this talk for Part 5 of the ‘Grassroots Policies for Farming, Food and Wildlife’ webinar series, hosted by Citizen Network.
In his presentation Dr Beck discusses the harms caused by the monopolisation of supermarkets in the food industry. He also explores the positive possibilities of local currencies.
Dr Beck is a Lecturer at the University of Salford, Manchester.
The webinar recording is available to watch on Citizen Network's website at: www.citizen-network.org
This document discusses key issues in disability and aged care systems and proposes ways to advance citizenship rights through self-directed support. It advocates for personal budgets and upstream solutions to prevent crises. It also highlights the need for innovation from communities, professionals, and individuals to develop sustainable and inclusive systems that respect people's freedom, support, participation, and citizenship.
Sabrina Espeleta of War on Want outlines the enormous and growing level of world hunger. She explains how a few global corporations control the vast majority of food production and supply and markets exploit the food market, leaving communities, especially in the Global South at great disadvantage. Local peasant farmers are now organising to achieve food sovereignty, seeking to farm in ways in harmony with nature and to meet local needs. The Global North needs to respect the rights and autonomy of these people rather than to continue the pattern of exploitation.
This presentation was given on 6 July in Part 4 of a webinar series on grassroots policies for farming, food and wildlife.
Watch the recording at: https://citizen-network.org
Simon Duffy was asked by the Mayor’s Greater Manchester Charity and UBI Lab Manchester to talk at a recent roundtable event on the relevance of Universal Basic Income (UBI) to the problem of homelessness.
These are the slides from that talk. In summary Duffy argued that UBI is relevant to reducing homelessness in two slightly different ways:
1. UBI would help prevent homelessness - UBI addresses the inequalities in income and housing that create the risk of homelessness.
2. UBI would help people escape homelessness - UBI gives people a vital tool which significantly helps people change their situation in times of crisis.
Find more free resources on basic income at: www.citizen-network.org
A presentation for the One Yorkshire Committee introducing Democratic Yorkshire - a voluntary alliance consisting of a group of organisations and individuals interested in planning a better future for our County through modern democratic means secured in a written constitution.
In this presentation exploring planning law, Laird Ryan talks us through the planning process, explores what we can and can't influence and helps us consider how best to create real, organic and local alliances that make the best use of our energy.
To find out more about the Neighbourhood Democracy Movement please visit: https://neighbourhooddemocracy.org
Citizenship is our Business - The Avivo StoryCitizen Network
Avivo is one of the founding organisations in Citizen Network. they are also pioneers in self-direction and personalised support in Australia. Over the past few years they have been reorganising themselves around the principle that everyone is a citizen - and supporting everyone, including paid staff, to be citizens is their central purpose. Avivo are also leading Citizen Network's Rethinking Organisations programme and networking with other organisations on this journey.
Dr Simon Duffy spoke to Doncaster's Mental Wellbeing Alliance about the importance of thinking about what good help really means. He explored the importance of shifting power, resources and thinking upstream.
Markus Vähälä, CEO of Citizen Network, outlined the development of the cooperative as a framework to support the further development of Citizen Network as part of the 2022 Building Citizen network Together events hosted by Eberswalde University.
At BuildingCitizen Network Together in early 2022 Simon Duffy and James Lock discussed the development of Citizen Network and its current approach to membership and explored with members from all around the world next steps for its development.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
Simon Duffy gave this talk for Radical Visions on home, citizenship, institutionalisation and neighbourhood democracy. He explains why institutions are wrong and what we might be do to end the drive towards institutionalisation.
A presentation for the Estia International Confernce in 2021 from Dr Simon Duffy exploring personal budgets, citizenship and community and the challenges for services aiming to work in partnership with people with disabilities in Greece.
An example of good practice in inclusion in employment from Slovenia, shared at the Day Centres Without Walls conference, hosted by JDC in Lithuania. Day Centres Without Walls is an Erasmus+ project funded by the EU.
EPALE - Europos suaugusiųjų švietimo specialistų mokymosi elektroninė platformaCitizen Network
Lina Trebienė of JDC explores the role of European e-learning platform for adult education professionals (EPALE) as part of the Day Centres Without Walls project.
This report explores the significance of border towns and spaces for strengthening responses to young people on the move. In particular it explores the linkages of young people to local service centres with the aim of further developing service, protection, and support strategies for migrant children in border areas across the region. The report is based on a small-scale fieldwork study in the border towns of Chipata and Katete in Zambia conducted in July 2023. Border towns and spaces provide a rich source of information about issues related to the informal or irregular movement of young people across borders, including smuggling and trafficking. They can help build a picture of the nature and scope of the type of movement young migrants undertake and also the forms of protection available to them. Border towns and spaces also provide a lens through which we can better understand the vulnerabilities of young people on the move and, critically, the strategies they use to navigate challenges and access support.
The findings in this report highlight some of the key factors shaping the experiences and vulnerabilities of young people on the move – particularly their proximity to border spaces and how this affects the risks that they face. The report describes strategies that young people on the move employ to remain below the radar of visibility to state and non-state actors due to fear of arrest, detention, and deportation while also trying to keep themselves safe and access support in border towns. These strategies of (in)visibility provide a way to protect themselves yet at the same time also heighten some of the risks young people face as their vulnerabilities are not always recognised by those who could offer support.
In this report we show that the realities and challenges of life and migration in this region and in Zambia need to be better understood for support to be strengthened and tuned to meet the specific needs of young people on the move. This includes understanding the role of state and non-state stakeholders, the impact of laws and policies and, critically, the experiences of the young people themselves. We provide recommendations for immediate action, recommendations for programming to support young people on the move in the two towns that would reduce risk for young people in this area, and recommendations for longer term policy advocacy.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Preliminary findings _OECD field visits to ten regions in the TSI EU mining r...OECDregions
Preliminary findings from OECD field visits for the project: Enhancing EU Mining Regional Ecosystems to Support the Green Transition and Secure Mineral Raw Materials Supply.
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019Partito democratico
DI SEGUITO SONO PUBBLICATI, AI SENSI DELL'ART. 11 DELLA LEGGE N. 3/2019, GLI IMPORTI RICEVUTI DALL'ENTRATA IN VIGORE DELLA SUDDETTA NORMA (31/01/2019) E FINO AL MESE SOLARE ANTECEDENTE QUELLO DELLA PUBBLICAZIONE SUL PRESENTE SITO
A Guide to AI for Smarter Nonprofits - Dr. Cori Faklaris, UNC CharlotteCori Faklaris
Working with data is a challenge for many organizations. Nonprofits in particular may need to collect and analyze sensitive, incomplete, and/or biased historical data about people. In this talk, Dr. Cori Faklaris of UNC Charlotte provides an overview of current AI capabilities and weaknesses to consider when integrating current AI technologies into the data workflow. The talk is organized around three takeaways: (1) For better or sometimes worse, AI provides you with “infinite interns.” (2) Give people permission & guardrails to learn what works with these “interns” and what doesn’t. (3) Create a roadmap for adding in more AI to assist nonprofit work, along with strategies for bias mitigation.
AHMR is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed online journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects (socio-economic, political, legislative and developmental) of Human Mobility in Africa. Through the publication of original research, policy discussions and evidence research papers AHMR provides a comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis of contemporaneous trends, migration patterns and some of the most important migration-related issues.
The Antyodaya Saral Haryana Portal is a pioneering initiative by the Government of Haryana aimed at providing citizens with seamless access to a wide range of government services
Food safety, prepare for the unexpected - So what can be done in order to be ready to address food safety, food Consumers, food producers and manufacturers, food transporters, food businesses, food retailers can ...
3. • There is no country where there is a full working basic income
system.
• There are and have been pilots of basic income around the world.
• Bits of our current system (state pension and child benefit) are
quite close to being a form of basic income.
• Social security for working age people has moved away from the
principles of basic income.
• There is an international campaign for basic income (e.g. BIEN
and Basic Income UK).
• Basic income is Green Party policy and John McDonnell has
expressed support for the idea in the past.
4. basic income is a radical
change to the social
security system
(ie tax and benefits)
5. basic income is different
• No means-testing (within the benefit itself) - universal
• No stigma and shame in claiming benefits - invisible
• No sanctions, you get it no matter what - unconditional
• No dependency, not family-based - individual
• Less confusing - simple(r)
6. basic income impact (?)
• Reduce poverty
• Improve health
• Improve work life
• End stigma
• Reduce suicides
• Reduce bureaucracy
• Increase solidarity
• Increase citizen action
• Improve life for carers
• Reduce domestic violence
• Improve learning
7. basic income in practice
• There is no agreed model or set level
• Housing subsidies may best be treated separately
• Attention will still need to be paid to disability costs
• It is not a replacement for existing public services
• Community support and responsibility are still important
8. basic income critics
Left-wing (e.g. NEF)
• It is better to give people
services than money
• It is a subsidy for bad
employers
• It will distract people from
fighting for employment rights
• It won’t be sensitive to differing
needs
Right-wing (e.g. JRF)
• It is not affordable
• It won’t be accepted
• It will discourage work
• It will encourage
dependence on the state
9. Benefits are not
government expenditure
they are part of a system
of redistribution
constrained by
political power
17. For the better off it is
effectively the equivalent
to the cost of
a cup of coffee…
18.
19. The current system is not
just bad, it has also got
progressively worse, with
income being taken away
form the poorest…
20.
21. If we really did
redistribute money
effectively then we could
eliminate poverty and
radically reduce
inequality…
22. 1. Reduce the income of richest 10% by 8.9%
to lift income of poorest 10% to level of second decile
and improve equality ratio to 1:5
2. Reduce the income of the richest 10% by 15.2%
to lift income of poorest 20% to level of third decile
and improve equality ratio to 1:4
3. Reduce the income of the richest 10% by 27%
to lift income of poorest 30% to level of fourth decile and
improve equality ratio to 1:3
what we could do instead
23.
24. If we were prepared to
change the tax system then
it would not be hard to
come up with a
basic income system more
generous than the
current system