This document outlines a presentation on planning for NEASC accreditation with a focus on 21st century skills. It discusses the evolution of educational reform over time from a focus on inputs/outputs to universal proficiency. It emphasizes developing skills like critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration and digital literacy. Charts are included that align student learning goals, assessments, instructional practices and data use to support coherence across these areas. Developing strong measures and using data to connect student learning, adult learning and systems/organizational improvement is highlighted.
The presentation will highlight changing demands (from a sharp focus on access to concerns about throughput) and responses related to admission to higher education, and the research underpinning such responses. Beginning in the late 1980s, the paper traces the development of assessment procedures n the ‘dynamic’ testing tradition (responding to the need to test for ‘potential’ and widen access). The paper ends with a discussion of the National Benchmark Tests Project (responding the need to places students in appropriate curricula and improve throughput), focusing on the research and approaches underlying these tests as well as the findings and some implications both for schooling and higher education.
Presented by A/Prof. Nan Yeld & Robert Prince
Topic2 understanding by the design at a glanceMaria Theresa
For us educators, nothing can be more challenging than the tasks we are facing right now, the infusion of fast pace-technological advancement in the classroom, the differentiated learning, multiple-intelligences, the use appropriate assessment and strategies has brought anxiety and dilemma to all Filipino educators. According to Dir. Andrada, Director of Bureau of Secondary Education “ When students are learning poorly, we cannot expect them to ready for further learning or for work”. We’ve been getting poor results because we are doing what we’ve always done, we need to do things differently and better. What do we need to do together? We need to strengthen the CORE CURRICULUM!
The presentation will highlight changing demands (from a sharp focus on access to concerns about throughput) and responses related to admission to higher education, and the research underpinning such responses. Beginning in the late 1980s, the paper traces the development of assessment procedures n the ‘dynamic’ testing tradition (responding to the need to test for ‘potential’ and widen access). The paper ends with a discussion of the National Benchmark Tests Project (responding the need to places students in appropriate curricula and improve throughput), focusing on the research and approaches underlying these tests as well as the findings and some implications both for schooling and higher education.
Presented by A/Prof. Nan Yeld & Robert Prince
Topic2 understanding by the design at a glanceMaria Theresa
For us educators, nothing can be more challenging than the tasks we are facing right now, the infusion of fast pace-technological advancement in the classroom, the differentiated learning, multiple-intelligences, the use appropriate assessment and strategies has brought anxiety and dilemma to all Filipino educators. According to Dir. Andrada, Director of Bureau of Secondary Education “ When students are learning poorly, we cannot expect them to ready for further learning or for work”. We’ve been getting poor results because we are doing what we’ve always done, we need to do things differently and better. What do we need to do together? We need to strengthen the CORE CURRICULUM!
In Depth Workshop: Academy Development - Day 1 of 2 Day WorkshopNAFCareerAcads
Participants will have the opportunity to explore current best practices for establishing classroom culture and craft a plan for the coming years that will help academy students produce successful projects.
Questions whether used in classroom teaching or for oral / written Examination, are the most important tool for effective teaching & learning. Teachers are expected to have mastery over framing questions.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
1. Planning for NEASC
Focus, Measure, & Connect
21st Century Skills
October 20th 2014
http://digitallearningforallnow.com
http://www.slideshare.net/jpcostasr
costa@educationconnection.org
Jonathan P. Costa
2. Mission
To prepare
EVERY student
for learning, life,
and work
in the 21st century.
5. The Evolution of Educational Reform (Have to Do)
Areas of Before 1986 NCLB 2001 PA12-116 2012
Focus
Learning Goals
Assessment Protocols
Accountability
Teacher Prep
Curriculum
Testing Tools
Student Abilities
Instructional Focus
Inputs/Outputs
Universal Access
Locally Determined
Rank and Sort
No News is Good News
Get A Degree
Table of Contents
Pencil & Paper
Grouped & Labeled
Teacher Dependent
Ready for K - 59.9 to Leave
Universal Proficiency
State by State
Tests for ALL
Label Failing Schools
Certifications & BEST
State Standards &
Frameworks
Pencil & Paper With
Performance Tasks
Integrated (N=40)
Standards Aligned
Need for Pre-School
Skill Demonstrations
Universal Measures
46 State Consortia
(Math, LA, Science)
Smarter Balance (IPI)
for All
Ranking Every District, School and
Teacher
Certifications, TEAM, and
SEED
Multi-State
Unified Standards
Digital With
Performance Tasks
Integrated & Scrutinized (N=20)
Common Core Aligned
And Digitally Supported
Pre-K and Full-K Standards
Demonstrations & Tests
6. Our world has changed…
1. It is digital, flat, open
and pluralistic.
2. It is unpredictable and
volatile.
3. It is increasingly
unforgiving to those
who are unskilled.
12. Shifting from Single Source to Crowd Source
Old School
“Read the part of
Chapter 6 on the
Boston Massacre and
be prepared to answer
questions.”
New School
1. Team One find 5 historical
narratives by different authors
2. Team Two find 5 primary source
documents from the trial
3. Team Three find 5 British history
references and opinions
4. Team Four find 5
contemporaneous editorials.
14. Align Your Systems With Your Goals for Learning
Type of
Assessment
Required
Subject Area
Responsibilities
Everyone’s
Responsibility
Content
(Declarative)
Facts
Content Skills
(Procedural)
Discrete Skills
CC/21st Cent. Skills
(Contextual)
Applied Understandings
Type of
Knowledge
Desired
Type of
Instruction
Required
Lecture, video,
films, assigned
readings and
memory activities.
Classroom or textbook
problems, experiments,
discussions, practice and
repetition.
Complex projects,
real time explorations,
authentic and relevant
skill applications.
Amount of
Time
Required
Discrete units,
spiraled and
predictable.
Ongoing, systemic and
without a finite
or predictable end.
Discrete units,
spiraled and
predictable.
Recall & recognition
based quizzes, tests,
and activities. Multiple
choice, matching, etc.
(SAT/AP/Exams)
Checklists,
analytic rubrics,
or other agreed upon
skill standards
(AP/SB/CAPT/Exams)
Holistic and,
analytic rubrics,
or other agreed upon
standards of rigor
(Portfolios, Exhibitions, SB)
15. Coherence Begins With Student Learning Focus
CC ELA
CC Math 21st CS
Jonathan P. Costa
E1/M3/21 - Demonstrate independent comprehension in reading
complex texts/viewing media.
E2/21 - Build a strong base of knowledge through content rich texts or
other appropriate sources of information.
E3/E6/M5/21 – Use digital tools to obtain, evaluate, synthesize, and
report findings/information clearly and effectively in response to a
variety of tasks and purposes.
M3/E4 - Construct and engage in viable arguments based on evidence
and critique reasoning of others.
E1/E3/E5/21 - Read, write, produce and speak grounded in evidence for
a variety of purposes and audiences.
M1/M2/M8/21 - Make sense of problems and persevere in solving
them.
E7/21 - Come to understand other perspectives & cultures through
reading, listening, and collaborations
M7/21 - Demonstrate innovation, flexibility and adaptability in thinking
patterns, work habits, and working/learning conditions.
M4/E7/21 - Value and demonstrate personal responsibility, character,
cultural understanding, and ethical behavior.
17. Data Based Decision Making
• Asking the questions, “How
do we know (Effect Data)
and “What are we doing
(Cause Data)?” and “How
are these things
connected?”
• How do we use cause and
effect data to guide
evaluation and support
decision making at every
level of the organization?
18. What Student Data Do You Have and Use?
Skill Set
Critical Attributes Assessments & Data Points
(Current)
Assessments & Data Points
(Needed)
Critical Stance
Based on Evidence
M3/E4
Construct and engage in
viable arguments based
on evidence and critique
reasoning of others.
SMP 3 – Distinguish correct logic in
reasoning from that which is flawed.
SMP3 –Build a logical progression of
statements to explore the truth about
conjectures.
SMP 3 -Use stated assumptions,
definitions, and previously established
results in constructing arguments.
SMP 3 - Recognize and use counter
examples.
SMP 3 – Contextualize and
decontextualize quantitative
relationships
E4 - Question an author’s or speaker’s
assumptions and premise
21 - Effectively analyze and evaluate
evidence, arguments, claims and
beliefs
21 - Synthesize and make connections
between information and arguments
21 - Interpret information and draw
conclusions based on the best analysis
CMT Strand 20 (Grade 5
Only) – State a conclusion
and explain why a claim is or
is not reasonable based on
data
CMT Reading
Comprehension: Strand D,
Objective 2 - Select,
synthesize and/or use relevant
information within the text(s)
to extend or evaluate the
text(s)
CAPT Interdisciplinary
Writing
CAPT Process Standards –
Express mathematical ideas
and arguments with clarity
and coherence.
Shared Rubrics
UniformPerformance Task
Smarter Balanced Interim
Assessments
Critical attribute level detail
and data
19.
20.
21.
22. Coherence
Begins With
Student
Learning
Focus
Discrepancy Gap Analysis Matrix
Universal Skills – Leverage Points
Universal Skill Set Importance &
Impact
Your Own
Practice
Total Score
Ranking
E1/21 - Demonstrate independence in reading complex texts or viewing
media and writing, speaking or producing content about them. 7 5 12
E2/21 - Build a strong base of knowledge through content rich texts or
other appropriate sources of information. 6 4 10
E3/21 – Use digital tools to obtain, evaluate, synthesize, and report
findings/information clearly and effectively in response to a variety of tasks
and purposes. 5 6 11
M3/E4 - Construct and engage in viable arguments based on evidence and
critique reasoning of others. 8 9 16
E5/21 - Read, write, produce and speak grounded in evidence for a variety
of purposes and audiences. 9 8 17
M1/M2/M8/21 - Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them 4 3 7
E6/21 - Come to understand other perspectives & cultures through reading,
listening, and collaborations 2 2 4
21 - Demonstrate innovation, flexibility and adaptability in thinking
patterns, work habits, and working/learning conditions. 3 7 10
E7/21 - Value and demonstrate personal responsibility, character, cultural
understanding, and ethical behavior 1 1 2
Common Core Portrait Statements / EDUCATION CONNECTION - Costa – 21st Century Skills Crosswalk Jonathan P. Costa
23. What Is Needed?
In a learning environment that supports the
development of these skills:
Students Should Be… Teachers Should Be…
24. The More You DO,
The More You Learn
Passive
Superficial
Active Involvement
Engaged & Empowered
25. Coherence Pathways
Mission
To develop in all
children the
knowledge, skills,
attitudes and
values...
Theory of Action
Focus
Measure
Connect
G = Goals P = Practices M= Measures Jonathan P. Costa S= Students A = Adults O = District/Building
26. Three Principles of Coherence
Measure
what you
value
Value
what you
measure
Measure Connect
Priority
Student
Learning
Priority
Adult
Learning
Priority
Systems
Learning
Focus
Student
Learning
Adult
Learning
Systems
Learning
27. Student Data
Driving
Instructional
Practices &
Decision
Making
Instruction
Driving
Improved
Measures
Professional
Practice
Driving
Improved
Measures
Systems
Driving
Improved
Measures
Adult Data
Driving
Professional
Learning &
Decision
Making
Organizational
Data
Driving
Systems
Decision
Making
28. Teachers
As
Student
Coaches
Data
Supporting
Reflective
Practice
Data
Supporting
Reflective
Practice
Data
Supporting
Reflective
Practice
Administrators
As
Instructional
Coaches
District
Staff
As
Administrator
Coaches
29. Coherence Pathways – 5,000 Foot View Leadership
Domain One
Student Learning
S-G Goals for Student Learning
• Connecticut Core/21st
Century Skills &
Content
A-G Goals for Professional Learning
• Evaluation & support
goals, SLOs, focus
goals & other
O-G Goals for Building and District
• Improvement targets
related to DPI, SPI or
other goals
Focus
Measure
Connect
O-M
Building &
District
Measures
DPI
SPI
5
10
Other…
A-M
Professional
Measures
45
40
(5/10)
S-M
Student
Measures
Smarter
Balanced &
other valued
summative,
formative,
standardized
and non-standardized
measures
To prepare every
student for
learning, life, and
work in the 21st
O-P
Mission
century.
Building &
District Practices
District or
building
level
plans or
strategies
A-P
Professional
Learning
Practices
Job
focused
& aligned
with
45
5
40
10
S-P
Instructional
Practices
CC/21CS
goal
aligned
teaching
methods
&
strategies
Domain Two
Professional Learning
Domain Three
Organizational Learning
Goals
Mission
Leadership
Practices Focus Measures
G = Goals P = Practices M= Measures Jonathan P. Costa S= Students A = Adults O = District/Building
30. Five Essential Connections for Coherence
1. Goals for Learning
Focus
2. Student Measures
Measure
3. Instructional Practices
Connect
4. Professional Components
(F, M, C)
5. Organizational Components
(F, M, C)
What are your most important,
high leverage goals for learning?
How will you know if you are
improving?
What instructional improvements
will have the greatest impact on
our performance?
How will our professional
components connect with and
reflect these priorities?
How will our organizational
components reflect and support
these priorities?
Priority Improvement Goals from
Common Core/21st Century
Aligned Assessment Data to Measure
Growth over Time
Aligned instructional Improvement
Grounded in TVAL Rubric
Aligned Goals and Data Tied to Student
Measures and Reflected in DPI/SPI
Aligned District and Building Plans That
Facilitate Alignment of Resources
Goals
Measures
Practices
Goals
Measures
Practices
Editor's Notes
This is the defining challenge of our times in public school.
With that accomplished, all else is possible.
Without it, your future is your print-based past.
The only solution then is to wait – wait until that day when we can afford to buy every student the same device.
Is it really more equitable to say that no one has access to technology until everyone can have the same thing?
It’s not about the device, its about what we do with it.
The only solution then is to wait – wait until that day when we can afford to buy every student the same device.
Is it really more equitable to say that no one has access to technology until everyone can have the same thing?
It’s not about the device, its about what we do with it.
The only solution then is to wait – wait until that day when we can afford to buy every student the same device.
Is it really more equitable to say that no one has access to technology until everyone can have the same thing?
It’s not about the device, its about what we do with it.
The only solution then is to wait – wait until that day when we can afford to buy every student the same device.
Is it really more equitable to say that no one has access to technology until everyone can have the same thing?
It’s not about the device, its about what we do with it.