Understanding the Common Core State StandardsAchieve, Inc.
This PowerPoint presentation was prepared in 2012.
In 2009, 48 states, 2 territories and the District of Columbia signed a memorandum of agreement with the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), committing to a state-led process - the Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI).
Achieve partnered with NGA and CCSSO on the Initiative and a number of Achieve staff and consultants served on the writing and review teams. On June 2, 2010, the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics (CCSS) were released, and since then, over 45 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and are now working to implement the standards.
Achieve has developed materials to help states, districts, and others understand the organization and content of the standards and the content and evidence base used to support the standards. Visit http://www.achieve.org
Understanding the Common Core State StandardsAchieve, Inc.
This PowerPoint presentation was prepared in 2012.
In 2009, 48 states, 2 territories and the District of Columbia signed a memorandum of agreement with the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), committing to a state-led process - the Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI).
Achieve partnered with NGA and CCSSO on the Initiative and a number of Achieve staff and consultants served on the writing and review teams. On June 2, 2010, the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics (CCSS) were released, and since then, over 45 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and are now working to implement the standards.
Achieve has developed materials to help states, districts, and others understand the organization and content of the standards and the content and evidence base used to support the standards. Visit http://www.achieve.org
NSTA15: Performance-Based Portfolio Assessment of the NGSSChris Ludwig
Slide deck for Chris Ludwig's presentation at NSTA15 in Chicago: Student Managed Portfolios: Performance-Based Alternatives to Standardized Tests for the NGSS
This session answers the following questions: (1) What are the implications of the 4IR on Educational Assessment and Education as a whole? (2) What skills do we need to assess given the landscape of the 4IR? (3) How do we assess such skills to prepare students in the 4IR? (4) What standards should schools adapt to prepare students in the 4IR?
NSTA15: Performance-Based Portfolio Assessment of the NGSSChris Ludwig
Slide deck for Chris Ludwig's presentation at NSTA15 in Chicago: Student Managed Portfolios: Performance-Based Alternatives to Standardized Tests for the NGSS
This session answers the following questions: (1) What are the implications of the 4IR on Educational Assessment and Education as a whole? (2) What skills do we need to assess given the landscape of the 4IR? (3) How do we assess such skills to prepare students in the 4IR? (4) What standards should schools adapt to prepare students in the 4IR?
DU CTLAT Presentation Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Educational Program...Dillard University Library
Articulate the genesis of development of a culture of assessment; Identifies the components of institutional effectiveness emanating from a system of data sharing and program improvement; Distinguish the purpose and verbage of a program, course, and student learning outcome
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
CAS Leadership Retreat 2014 - Coherence Planning
1. Finding Coherence
Mission, Leadership, & Focus
CAS Summer Leadership
June 26th 2014
http://digitallearningforallnow.com
http://www.slideshare.net/jpcostasr
costa@educationconnection.org
Jonathan P. Costa
3. The Evolution of Educational Reform (Have to Do)
Focus
Learning Goals
Assessment Protocols
Accountability
Teacher Prep
Curriculum
Testing Tools
Student Abilities
Instructional Focus
Inputs/Outputs
Universal Access
Locally Determined
Rank and Sort
No News is Good News
Get A Degree
Table of Contents
Pencil & Paper
Grouped & Labeled
Teacher Dependent
Ready for K - 59.9 to Leave
Universal Proficiency
State by State
Tests for ALL
Label Failing Schools
Certifications & BEST
State Standards &
Frameworks
Pencil & Paper With
Performance Tasks
Integrated (N=40)
Standards Aligned
Need for Pre-School
Skill Demonstrations
Universal Measures
46 State Consortia
(Math, LA, Science)
Smarter Balance
(IPI) for All
Ranking Every District, School
and Teacher
Certifications, TEAM,
and SEED
Multi-State
Unified Standards
Digital With
Performance Tasks
Integrated & Scrutinized
(N=20)
Common Core Aligned
And Digitally Supported
Pre-K and Full-K Standards
Demonstrations & Tests
Areas of Before 1986 NCLB 2001 PA12-116 2012
5. Our world has changed…
1. It is digital, flat and
open.
2.It is unpredictable
and volatile.
3.It is increasingly
unforgiving to those
who are unskilled.
6. And our world is still changing…
Less paper,
more pixels.
Less single source,
more crowd source.
Less just in case,
more just in time.
Less about testing,
more being tested.
7. Think About What Is Needed…
Students Should Be…
• Self-directed
• Solving problems
• Flexible
• Persistent
• Curious
• Reflective
• Logical
• Creative
Teachers Should Be…
• Crafting problems
• Designing for ambiguity
• Valuing engagement
• Emphasizing evidence
• Organizing activity
• Generating opportunity
• Facilitating learning
• Supporting & encouraging
12. Coherence Pathways
G = Goals P = Practices M= Measures Jonathan P. Costa S= Students A = Adults O = District/Building
Leadership
Focus
Engagement
Ownership
Rigor
Alignment
Mission
To prepare every
student for
learning, life, and
work in the 21st
century.
13. S-G Goals for Student Learning
•All goals for student
learning
A-G Goals for Professional Learning
•All goals for adult
learning
O-G Goals for Building and District
•All building or district
improvement goals
All the
ways we
measure
building
and
district
progress.
O-M
Building &
District
Measures
All the
ways we
measure
individual
adult
learning
and
practice.
A-M
Professional
Measures
All the
ways we
measure
student
learning.
S-M
Student
Measures
All the
plans we
make for
buildings
and
district
progress
O-P
Building &
District Practices
All the
ways
we lead
adults
to learn
All the
ways we
lead
students
to
learning
Domain One
Student Learning
Domain Two
Professional Learning
Domain Three
Organizational Learning
Goals
Mission
Leadership
Focus MeasuresPractices
G = Goals P = Practices M= Measures Jonathan P. Costa S= Students A = Adults O = District/Building
S-P
Instructional
Practices
A-P
Professional
Learning
Practices
Coherence Pathways – 10,000 Foot View Leadership
Focus
Engagement
Ownership
Rigor
Alignment
Mission
To prepare every
student for
learning, life, and
work in the 21st
century.
14. S-G Goals for Student Learning
•Connecticut Core/21st
Century Skills &
Content
A-G Goals for Professional Learning
•Evaluation & support
goals, SLOs, focus
goals & other
O-G Goals for Building and District
•Improvement targets
related to DPI, SPI or
other goals
DPI
SPI
5
10
Other…
O-M
Building &
District
Measures
45
40
(5/10)
Smarter
Balanced &
other valued
summative,
formative,
standardized
and non-
standardized
measures
S-M
Student
Measures
District or
building
level
plans or
strategies
Job
focused
& aligned
with
45
5
40
10
CC/21CS
goal
aligned
teaching
methods
&
strategies
Domain One
Student Learning
Domain Two
Professional Learning
Domain Three
Organizational Learning
Goals
Mission
Leadership
Focus MeasuresPractices
G = Goals P = Practices M= Measures Jonathan P. Costa S= Students A = Adults O = District/Building
S-P
Instructional
Practices
A-P
Professional
Learning
Practices
O-P
Building &
District Practices
A-M
Professional
Measures
Coherence Pathways – 5,000 Foot View Leadership
Focus
Engagement
Ownership
Rigor
Alignment
Mission
To prepare every
student for
learning, life, and
work in the 21st
century.
15. Five Steps to Coherence
Focus on High Leverage Student Learning Goals
Aligned Assessments of Learning
Aligned Instructional Improvements
Aligned Adult and Organizational Measures
Aligned Adult and Organizational Practices
16. Align Your Systems With Your Goals for Learning
Type of
Assessment
Required
Subject Area
Responsibilities
Everyone’s
Responsibility
Content
(Declarative)
Facts
Content Skills
(Procedural)
Discrete Skills
CC/21st Cent. Skills
(Contextual)
Applied Understandings
Type of
Knowledge
Desired
Type of
Instruction
Required
Lecture, video,
films, assigned
readings and
memory activities.
Classroom or textbook
problems, experiments,
discussions, practice and
repetition.
Complex projects,
real time explorations,
authentic and relevant
skill applications.
Amount of
Time
Required
Discrete units,
spiraled and
predictable.
Ongoing, systemic and
without a finite
or predictable end.
Discrete units,
spiraled and
predictable.
Recall & recognition
based quizzes, tests,
and activities. Multiple
choice, matching, etc.
(SAT/AP/Exams)
Checklists,
analytic rubrics,
or other agreed upon
skill standards
(AP/SB/CAPT/Exams)
Holistic and,
analytic rubrics,
or other agreed upon
standards of rigor
(Portfolios, Exhibitions, SB)
17. Coherence Begins With Student Learning Focus
CC ELA
21st CSCC Math
Jonathan P. Costa
E1/M3/21 - Demonstrate independent comprehension in reading
complex texts/viewing media.
E2/21 - Build a strong base of knowledge through content rich texts or
other appropriate sources of information.
E3/E6/M5/21 – Use digital tools to obtain, evaluate, synthesize, and
report findings/information clearly and effectively in response to a
variety of tasks and purposes.
M3/E4 - Construct and engage in viable arguments based on evidence
and critique reasoning of others.
E1/E3/E5/21 - Read, write, produce and speak grounded in evidence for
a variety of purposes and audiences.
M1/M2/M8/21 - Make sense of problems and persevere in solving
them.
E7/21 - Come to understand other perspectives & cultures through
reading, listening, and collaborations
M7/21 - Demonstrate innovation, flexibility and adaptability in thinking
patterns, work habits, and working/learning conditions.
M4/E7/21 - Value and demonstrate personal responsibility, character,
cultural understanding, and ethical behavior.
18. Coherence
Begins With
Student
Learning
Focus
Universal Skill Set Importance &
Impact
Your Own
Practice
Total Score
Ranking
E1/21 - Demonstrate independence in reading complex texts or viewing
media and writing, speaking or producing content about them. 7 5 12
E2/21 - Build a strong base of knowledge through content rich texts or
other appropriate sources of information. 6 4 10
E3/21 – Use digital tools to obtain, evaluate, synthesize, and report
findings/information clearly and effectively in response to a variety of tasks
and purposes.
5 6 11
M3/E4 - Construct and engage in viable arguments based on evidence and
critique reasoning of others. 8 9 16
E5/21 - Read, write, produce and speak grounded in evidence for a variety
of purposes and audiences. 9 8 17
M1/21 - Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them 4 3 7
E6/21 - Come to understand other perspectives & cultures through reading,
listening, and collaborations 2 2 4
21 - Demonstrate innovation, flexibility and adaptability in thinking
patterns, work habits, and working/learning conditions. 3 7 10
E7/21 - Value and demonstrate personal responsibility, character, cultural
understanding, and ethical behavior 1 1 2
Discrepancy Gap Analysis Matrix
Universal Skills – Leverage Points
Jonathan P. CostaCommon Core Portrait Statements / EDUCATION CONNECTION - Costa – 21st Century Skills Crosswalk
20. Coherence
Begins With
Student
Learning
Focus
Decision Making Considerations
For 1A (How Many?)
1. Universal Skills
SLO
(everyone)
• District level
targets
2. Building,
Department or
Course SLO
(most)
• Building
level targets
3. Personal SLO
(some)
• Classroom
level targets
IAGDs are
always at the
classroom level.
Jonathan P. Costa
21. S-G Goals for Student Learning
• Critical stance
• Problem solving
A-G Goals for Professional Learning
•Administrator goals - SLO
(45%) and leadership focus
goals (40%)
•Teacher goals – SLO (45%)
and instructional focus goals.
O-G Goals for Building and District
• Board Goals
• Superintendent’s Goals
• District Goals (Strategic Plan)
• Building/Program Goals
(Building based improvement
plan)
- Data points that
are derived from
the Student
Measures and
Professional
Measures and are
reflective of
success in mastery
of the four key
skill areas.
O-M
Building & District
Measures
- Administrator
measures - SLO
(45%) and
leadership focus
measures (40%)
Teacher
measures – SLO
(45%) and
instructional focus
measures.
A-M
Professional Measures
- Existing CMT/CAPT data
related to the four key
skills
- Potential/eventual
Smarter Balanced
assessment items
that are aligned with
identified behaviors.
- Local assessments
that are aligned with
each of the four key
skills and the
identified behaviors
that demonstrate
successful mastery
S-M
Student Measures
- BOE Strategic Plan -
with master district
strategies to help build
capacity around
instruction and
assessment in the four
key skill areas.
- Building based
improvement plans,
aligned where
appropriate with district
plan, with building
based strategies to build
capacity and around
instruction and
assessment in the four
skill areas.
O-P
Building & District
Practices
- Professional
learning resources
are delivered at the
point of contact and
need to build
proficiency in the
instructional
practices most
required for success.
- These professional
learning resource
pools are connected
to the (S-P) and
captured by the
plans in the (O-P)
Instructional
practices are
identified based on
their ability to
support the
development of
proficiency required
for success in the
four key skill areas.
G = Goals P = Practices M= Measures Jonathan P. Costa S= Students A = Adults O = District/Building
S-P
Instructional Practices
A-P Professional
Learning Practices
Coherence Pathways – Danbury Leadership
Focus
Engagement
Ownership
Rigor
Alignment
Mission
To prepare every
student for
learning, life, and
work in the 21st
century.
22. Coherence
Begins With
Student
Learning
Focus
Decision Making Considerations
Predicting Improvement
Makes
connections
between S-
G & S-M
Connections
between S-G,
S-M, & S-P
Evidence of
some
connections
between S, A,
O & G, M, P
Strong
connections
among and
between S,
A, O & G, M,
P
Jonathan P. Costa
23. Five Steps to Coherence
1. Goals for Learning
(S-G)
2. Student Measures
(S-M)
3. Instructional Practices
(S-P)
4. Adult/Organizational Measures
(A/O-M)
5. Adult/Organizational Practices
(A/O-P)
What are your most important,
high leverage goals for learning?
How will you know if you are
improving?
What instructional improvements
will have the greatest impact on
our performance?
How will our adult measures of
performance connect with and
reflect these priorities?
How will our organizational plans
reflect and support these
priorities?
Priority Improvement Goals from
Common Core/21st Century
Aligned Assessment Data to Measure
Growth over Time
Aligned instructional Improvement
Grounded in TVAL Rubric
Aligned Data from Student Measures
and Reflected in DPI/SPI
Aligned District and Building Plans That
Facilitate Alignment of Resources