This document discusses monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for watershed development projects. It outlines lessons learned from past projects, including weak coordination, lack of stakeholder involvement, and inadequate M&E. Key issues to address are strategic coordination, beneficiary commitment, and strengthening M&E. The document describes the importance of M&E in providing feedback and corrective steps. It outlines different types of M&E including concurrent monitoring, impact assessment, and self-assessment. Finally, it discusses structures and methodologies for implementing effective M&E.
Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation background, concepts and principles, goals of PM&E, the PM&E process, stakeholder analysis, PM&E framework, plan, worksheet, a case study using PM&E
Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation background, concepts and principles, goals of PM&E, the PM&E process, stakeholder analysis, PM&E framework, plan, worksheet, a case study using PM&E
This presentation explains the difference between Monitoring and Evaluation; the types of M&E frameworks; steps in logical framework and its difference from theory of change.
6 M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation of Aid ProjectsTony
A series of course modules on project cycle, planning and the logical framework, aimed at team leaders of international NGOs in developing countries.
This is part 6 of 11, beginning with 2 modules on leadership and conflict resolution, then 9 modules on project cycle management.
This module has 3 handouts and presenter notes as separate documents.
Sample Proposal: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-watsan-training-sample-proposal-09
Slides as a handout: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-me-handout
Presenter notes: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-module-6-presenter-notes
Introduction to the Logical Framework ApproachDamien Sweeney
An introduction into the Logical Framework Approach, and its use and usefulness for project design, project planning, in the international development sector and beyond.
Monitoring and evaluation is a vital component that determines the effectiveness of a corporation's assistance by establishing clear links between past, present and future initiatives and results. The process helps in improving the programme performance and achieving desired results. It provides opportunities for fine-tuning, re-orientation and planning of the programme effectively, without which it becomes impossible to measure the success and impact of the programme even if the approach is right.
This presentation explains the difference between Monitoring and Evaluation; the types of M&E frameworks; steps in logical framework and its difference from theory of change.
6 M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation of Aid ProjectsTony
A series of course modules on project cycle, planning and the logical framework, aimed at team leaders of international NGOs in developing countries.
This is part 6 of 11, beginning with 2 modules on leadership and conflict resolution, then 9 modules on project cycle management.
This module has 3 handouts and presenter notes as separate documents.
Sample Proposal: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-watsan-training-sample-proposal-09
Slides as a handout: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-me-handout
Presenter notes: http://www.slideshare.net/Makewa/6-module-6-presenter-notes
Introduction to the Logical Framework ApproachDamien Sweeney
An introduction into the Logical Framework Approach, and its use and usefulness for project design, project planning, in the international development sector and beyond.
Monitoring and evaluation is a vital component that determines the effectiveness of a corporation's assistance by establishing clear links between past, present and future initiatives and results. The process helps in improving the programme performance and achieving desired results. It provides opportunities for fine-tuning, re-orientation and planning of the programme effectively, without which it becomes impossible to measure the success and impact of the programme even if the approach is right.
During this masterclass, participants will delve into the fundamental concepts, tools, and techniques of project monitoring and evaluation. Through interactive discussions, case studies, and practical exercises, attendees will gain a comprehensive understanding of MEAL principles and their application in diverse project contexts.
Key Objectives
Understand the importance of project monitoring and evaluation in ensuring project success.
Learn how to develop and implement effective monitoring and evaluation frameworks.
Explore various data collection methods and analysis techniques for monitoring and evaluation purposes.
Gain insights into utilizing monitoring and evaluation findings to inform decision-making and improve project outcomes.
Learning Outcomes: By the end of the masterclass, participants will able to:
Define key concepts related to project monitoring and evaluation.
Develop a monitoring and evaluation plan tailored to specific project requirements.
Apply appropriate data collection methods and tools for monitoring and evaluation activities.
Utilize monitoring and evaluation findings to enhance project performance and impact.
Why Attend:
Enhance your professional skills: Acquire practical knowledge and skills in project monitoring and evaluation that can be applied across various sectors and industries.
Boost career prospects: Gain a competitive edge by adding project monitoring and evaluation expertise to your skill set, making you a valuable asset to organizations and employers.
Network with industry professionals: Connect with like-minded individuals, experts, and practitioners in the field of project management and evaluation, fostering valuable relationships and potential collaborations.
Stay updated with industry trends: Learn about the latest trends, best practices, and emerging technologies in project monitoring and evaluation, ensuring you stay ahead in your professional journey.
4. Contact Stakeholders: The last stage is to get in touch with your stakeholders to inquire about their interest in a potential cooperation after they have been found, investigated, and prioritized. The first stage in this process is to use the intelligence you've obtained to pinpoint intersections where you can create chances that will show a win-win situation for both firms. Next, decide who in your organization would be the most appropriate to call and who would be the greatest individual to target within the organization. Note that occasionally building relationships with multiple people inside an organization is beneficial. The exchange of messages among all the parties involved in a project or business is known as stakeholder communication. Project managers, team members, clients, department heads, and firm leaders are examples of stakeholders. Regular video or in-person meetings are a few examples of common stakeholder communication channels
3. Prioritize Stakeholders: Stakeholder mapping is one method you can use to rank stakeholders. In order to do this, stakeholders must be categorized according to their level of Influence, influence, and interest. The stakeholder mapping groups you've generated can then be used to construct engagement strategies. The link between the stakeholder group's influence or power and the interest the stakeholder takes in the relationship can be used to represent stakeholder priority.
This task involved classifying the stakeholders who had been identified into six alternative categories, including demand side stakeholders/customers, infrastructure providers, terminal operators, long-distance transport operators, short-distance transport operators, and transport policy decision makers (local, regional, national, and EU level).
Prioritizing the participants comes after gaining a better understanding of the ecosystem of stakeholders. There are many factors that may be used to rank or categorize stakeholders, and some of the classifications we frequently employ at Proof are:
• Relevance – Do
Monitoring and evaluation.
A presentation in Arabic/English prepared the Palestinian Center for Peace and Democracy (PCPD)
اعداد المركز الفلسطيني للسلام والديمقراطية
فلسطين , ديمقراطية , ديموقراطية , monitoring , elections, evaluation , politics
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
2. Lessons learnt from the past experience
Weak institutional collaboration and co-ordination among various
agencies
Inadequate beneficiary and stake holders involvement in planning and
implementation of programme with a tendency towards top-down
approach resulting in lack sustainability of project activities
Weak linkage with PRIs
Poor cost recovery in many programmes and inadequately defined
benefit and cost-sharing arrangements
Lack of appropriate and technical recommendations and norms
suitable for rainfed agriculture in different agro-climatic Zones
Inadequate emphasis on equity aspects of watershed development
Inadequate Monitoring & Evaluation of physical, financial performance
and quality indicators
3. Issues to be addressed
Strategic co-ordination
Harmonization of norms and guidelines
Beneficiary and stakeholder commitment
Linkage with PRIs
Cost sharing arrangement
Reaching marginalized and vulnerable groups
Location-specific watershed-oriented research
Strengthening Monitoring and Evaluation
4. Why Monitoring & Evaluation
To develop a good monitoring & Evaluation system
M & E is an inseparable component of the project to
provide regular feedback to the management on its weak
links to facilitate taking up necessary & timely corrective
steps on project implementation & to make the project
successful with the expected results
Monitoring is the process of measuring, collecting,
processing & communicating information to assist the
management in project implementation
5. Evaluation is a step further, it assess the physical, financial
inputs, personnel, activities and expected results. It
analysis whether these efforts are in the right direction of
achieving objectives results.
“Learning” as the word devotes provides for corrective
measures based as the said monitoring and evaluation in
the course of the project formulations and executive from
the initial stage to till the completion of the project.
6. Opportunity to observe and trace the path of the project
progress.
Evaluation of specific activities at different stages to verify
whether project progress is on the expected lines.
Reflects deficiency is planning and execution.
Identify loopholes in project progress- adopt corrective
measures.
7. Types of Monitoring & Evaluation
1. Concurrent Monitoring.
a) Input – output monitoring.
b) Process monitoring.
c) Self assessment.
2. Discrete monitoring
a) Impact assessment.
8. Structure of Monitoring & Evaluation
Discrete monitoring
Impact Assessment
Independent M & L
(Frequency)
Concurrent monitoring
Input Output
monitoring
Process
monitoring
Self Evaluation
/ Assessment
By WDD at various
level with support
system by M &L
Independently by
M & L agency
By CBOs themselves
fecilitated,trained & supported by
PNGO/LNGO
Weekly Monthly Quarterly Annually
Continuously/
weekly/monthl
y/quarterly
Half yearly
Before the
project
interventio
ns
Mid term-
after 36
months of
the project
After
completion
of the
project
9. Input Output Monitoring
Tracks the physical and financial progress of the
project implementation.
Ensures monitoring of inputs, outputs and
installations based on quantifiable numbers and
time frame – facilitated through MIS which collects
relevant data and generates reports.
10. Objective of input output Monitoring
To ensure that inputs are delivered within the specified time frame –
Indicative checklist on social mobilization, entry point activities, group
formation (SHG, AG, SWS-EC), training / capacity building, SWAP
preparation and implementation, would facilitate to verify and assess
the outputs expected from the stipulated interventions.
To serve as an early warning mechanism – This shall provide
assistance in implementing corrective measures.
Primarily, the watershed department, and SWS- EC (facilitated by
FNGOs) would be responsible for input / output monitoring of the
project at all levels. This would facilitate concurrent and transparent
monitoring. The regular monitoring would also involve the other
stakeholders in the project
11. Process Monitoring
Process Monitoring (PM), when specifically referred, is a
set of activities designed to collect longitudinal information,
both qualitative and quantitative, on a dynamic platform”. It
focuses not only on inputs and outputs but more
importantly at ‘what drives a process’.
PM is a tool that helps to provide the process and the
contextual data required for capacity building towards
effective programme implementation.
The term ‘Process Monitoring’ is used to denote the activities of
consciously selecting processes. “Selectively and Systematically
observing them so as to ‘compare’ them with others and
communicating on that in order to learn how to steer and shape the
process”.
12. What to monitor
The structural characteristics/institutions have defined
functionalities-each one has a specific role to play and a
well-defined jurisdiction to operate. Having several
institutions, it is to be ascertained that each plays its role to
the optimum in a given context. The ‘functional aspect’ of
each institution lead us to the questions:
What to monitor: and thus guiding us to the indicators of
process monitoring’.
When to monitor: the frequency/ time frame in which these
organizations to be monitored against their given
functionality.
13. Methodology
Sl.no Method adopted Nature of information collected, areas & institutions related
with
1
Focused group discussion
Mainly for gathering information from – SHGs, Ags and ECs, Level
of Awareness, Sensitisation, Environmental, Social equity aspects,
SWAP, etc.
2
Rapid rural Appraisal
For information about sensitization and awareness programmes
conducted by FNGOs; level of awareness about WS & Sujala &
programmes.
3
Participatory observation (Transect walks)
Where FNGOs were fecilitating AG meetings & SHGs; Delineation
& SWAP activities planning.
4 Survey through structured schedules (Mainly
to gather information from individuals)
For issues related to gender, Environmental awareness individual
participation level at the ECs, opinion about NGOs, Govt.
functioning & functioning & DWDO functioning.
5
Case studies
Comprehensive Recording of specific Case – studies in the
process as it occurred based on information at the grass – root
level by the participant people, NGO staff, or officials; These it may
include even a success story or any limitation of a AG, SHG or EC
functioning.
6 In addition to the above the field staff / scientists are advised to maintain the following:
Daily field visit details chart.
Daily field note book.
Weekly summary report book.
14. Self Assessment
‘Self assessment’ is the assessment and evaluation of the project
progress by the stakeholders themselves at their level. ‘Sujala’ project
being conceived as a people planned and implemented project, it
mainly refers to the self assessment of CBOs viz – SHG, AG and SWS-
EC. Particularly self evaluation of SWS-EC is of most important
because, the project responsibilities, implementation and sustaining
the CBOs for the future in development perspective mainly lies with
these SWS-ECs.
Self assessment is done through self applying a structured schedule;
which is eveloed by the PNGO.
PNGO also orients training and capacity building for these CBOs in self
assessment.
15. SHG Monitoring
Time Frame SHG Efficiency/Indicators
1st to 3 months : Micro credit, Routine meetings
& Attendance
II Quarters (3rd – 6th Months) :Micro credit based + WS
Concept (both equal weight
age)
III Quarters (6th – 9th Months) :Credit based (less weight
age )
WS (more weight age)
IV Quarters (9th – 12th Months) :Credit based + Routine
(still I w WS Base (added indicators with weight age)
16. Impact assessment
Impact evaluation of the project is done to
assess the overall impact of project on the
natural resources and socio – economic
aspects. This is done through 10 %
sampling (socio – economic and natural
resources) with respect to baseline, mid
term and final assessment.
17. Stages of Impact Assessment
Impact assessment is done in 3 stages:
1. Initial stage: Baseline survey – random sampling, control villages, GIS
analysis, natural resources survey, social aspects and other data.
2. Mid – term assessment coincides with mid term of project
implementation. Uses baseline information as benchmark.
3. Final Assessment: Coincides with end of project. Focuses on:
Reduction in poverty of small and marginal farmers, landless persons,
women, and indigenous people.
Impact indicators that allow for an assessment of the sustainability of
the institutions created by the project, sustainability of project
interventions, and overall improvement of the watershed.
18. Important indicators of assessment
Socio – economic: Family details, Housing conditions,
Savings and Credits, Assets, Livestock,Food
consumption pattern, Details on the Basic Needs etc.
Natural – resource based: Land Related Information,
Details on Irrigation, Water Management, Agricultural
Inputs, Pesticides, Farming Practices, Post –
harvesting Practices, Ground water and Surface water
details, Soil types and erosion etc.
Others : Village infrastructure details, Common
Property resources etc.
19. M & E as a part of the project
programme
Monitoring & Evaluation to be understood as a part of the
project. It is a part of the project component as any other
intervention activities like natural resource development
plan, agriculture action plan, IGA, VG Sub – plan or
capacity building of CBOs. The ultimate purpose of
Monitoring & Learning is to steer the ship of project in right
direction towards its goal. It is a part and parcel of the
project programme.