The document provides information about the National Convention Quality Circle team for 2010. It lists the leader and deputy leader, team members, and facilitators. It provides details about the team profile such as date of formation, meeting schedule, attendance, projects undertaken and completed. The document outlines the aim, objectives, and steps followed by the team. It also includes identification of problems, selection of the main problem to address, and definition of the selected problem.

2. WELCOME
National Convention Quality circle
2010

3. LEADER
PHILEMON
DEPUTY LEADER
MONISHA
SAMARTH
TEAM MEMBERS

4. RECODER TIME KEEPER
GEETHIKA DARSHAN
4
SAMARTH

5. ACTIVE MEMBER
ACTIVE MEMBER
RAJESH ANGEL
ACTIVE MEMBER
ABDUL
SAMARTH

7. Ms.CHETHANA
FACILITATORs
CO-ORDINATOR: Mrs.ASHA
SAMARTH
Ms.PALLAVI

8. 8NEC BANGALORE
CP-04 : Diploma in Electronics
CP-08 : Diploma in Computer Engineering
CP-09 : Diploma In Information Technology
CP-10: Post Diploma In Power Electronics
Special Course : NCVT(Only for physically challenged)
SAMARTH

9. TEAM PROFILE:
Date of formation
Day of meeting
Venue of meeting
Duration of meeting
No of meetings
Attendance%
Project under taken
Project completed
: 2nd,Dec 09
: Wednesday
: Classroom 3
: 2 Hours
: 21 no.
: 100%
: 01
: 01
SAMARTH

10. AIM:
“TO DESIGN THE FUTURE
WITH QUALITY AND
INNOVATION.”
SAMART
H

11. OBJECTIVE:
“TO UNIFY THE POTENTIAL OF
OUR TEAM
TO REACH THE ESTEEM LEVEL OF
QUALITY.”
SAMART
H

12. Steps
followed
in
12
SAMART
H

13. Identification of problem
Selection of problem
Definition of problem
Analysis of problem
Cause and effect analysis
Root cause analysis
SAMART
H

14. Data analysis on root
cause
Development of solution
Foreseeing probable
resistance
Trial implementation
Regular implementation
SAMART
H

15. Process
Decision
Program Chart
SAMART
H

16. SAMARTH QC team
process
Identification of the
problem
Brain storming
technique
Past experience
Data
collection
Selection of the
problem
Definition of
The problem
stratification Matrix
diagram
Data collection
A
SAMART
H

17. Analysis of the
problem
Pareto chart &
Check list
Validation & Why-
Why Analysis
Root cause analysis
Cause & effect
diagram
Cause & effect analysis
4W & 1H Technique
A
B
SAMARTH
17

18. Pie chartData collection
Development of solutions
Data analysis on route cause
Regular implementation
Trial implementation
Foreseeing probable
resistance
B SAMARTH
Follow up review
18

19. IDENTIFICATION OF
PROBLEMS
STEP1
SAMARTH
19

20. SAMART
H
Identified 67
PROBLEMs
BRAIN STORMING
&
DATA COLLECTION
SAMARTH

21. 1. No proper utilization of components tester by trainees.
2. No proper maintenance of first aid box.
3. Submission of assignments, notes & records are not done properly by
trainees.
4. No frequent conduction of seminars.
5. No proper utilization of transformer winding machine by trainees.
6. No proper utilization of pneumatic and hydraulic labs by trainees.
7. No proper conduction of open forums.
8. Lack of experienced faculties.
9. No proper guidance for doing projects.
10.No proper transportation facilities for 1st years.
11.Non availability of lockers in 1st year campus.
12.No proper information regarding mess bills.
13.No updating of syllabus for IInd & IIIrd years.
14.Services like Xerox, printout etc, are not provided for trainees.
15.No proper equipments in physics lab for 1st year trainees.
16.No proper contact with other engineering collages.
LISTED PROBLEMS SAMARTH

22. 17.No proper maintenance of 5’s box .
18.No proper exposure of projects done by the trainees.
19.No proper maintenance of projectors, OHP’s and junction boxes.
20.No proper utilization of the machines using in workshop.
21.No proper allocation of particular workbenches to the trainees.
22.High failure in practical's .
23.Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.
24.Lack of knowledge about non-working of equipments in trainees.
25.No updation of components status list in labs.
26.No proper allocation of equipments to the particular trainees in AE-II lab.
27.Consuming more time for taking extra labs.
28.No awareness regarding the safety precaution to be followed in
workshop.
29.Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.
30.No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.
31.Lack of component testers in analog lab AE-II.
32.In efficient utilization of working hours by trainees.
33.Improper working of DTK’s and mp-kits.
SAMARTH

23. 34. Non availability of class rooms for extra classes.
35.No proper allocation of time for sports, to the trainees.
36. No proper net facility for second year trainees.
37. No proper co-curricular activities are conducted for trainees.
38. Insufficient no. of technical portraits in labs and class rooms.
39. No proper conduction of safety week.
40. Completion of syllabus is not done on time by the faculties.
41. Activities are not carried out as mentioned in the activity calendar.
42. Non availability of tools in workshop.
43. Lack of necessary books in library for trainees.
44. No fire alarm system in campus.
45. No proper information regarding the absence of faculties.
46. No proper information regarding industries.
47. Non availability of components during extra labs.
48. Mis -utilization of library cards by trainees.
49. Wastage of time in collecting the components in labs.
50. No proper maintenance of class rooms.
SAMARTH

24. 51. No lab manuals to guide the trainees.
52. Lack of components in analog lab II
53. Wastage of electricity in classrooms.
54. No hobby projects are allocated in 4th semester.
55. No drinking water facility in working area.
56. Non- availability of required software's.
57. No proper engagement of classes in the absence of allocated facilities.
58. Components are not issued in right time for projects.
59. Insufficient stationary items in general stores.
60. Time is not allocated for utilizing library facility.
61. Improper time management in conducting assembly
62. No proper guidance from faculties during extra labs.
63. Lack of library facility for first year trainees.
64. No proper usage of daily dairy by trainees.
65. No proper guidance for visitors
66. No proper awareness regarding new software.
67. No proper 5’s activities are followed in labs and classrooms by the trainees.
SAMARTH

25. SELECTION OF
PROBLEM
STEP2
SAMARTH

26. IDENTIFIED
PROBLEMS
a
C
B
CATEGORIZATION: SAMARTH

27. The problems which can be solved only by the trainees.
The problems which can be solved by the trainees with
the minimum help of the management .
The problems which can be solved only by the
management.
Category A:
Category B:
Category C:
SAMARTH

28. -CATEGORY A13
SAMART
H

29. A- category SAMARTH
1. High failure rate in practical's.
2. Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.
3. No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of CP04 II year
trainees.
4. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.
5. Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.
6. No proper interaction between seniors and juniors.
7. Lack of component testers in analog electronics lab-II.
8. No regular check up of suggestion box.
9. No updating of component status list in labs.
10. Lack of knowledge about the working of equipments in first year
trainees.
11.No awareness, regarding the safety precautions to be followed in
workshop.
12.Lack of junction boxes in CP04 II year class rooms.
13.No proper allocation of particular workbench to the trainees.

30. 20-CATEGORY B
SAMART
H

31. 1. No proper maintenance of 5’s box .
2. No proper exposure of projects done by the trainees.
3. No proper utilization of the machines using in workshop.
4. No proper utilization of components tester by trainees.
5. No proper maintenance of first aid box.
6. Submission of assignments, notes & records are not done properly by trainees.
7. No frequent conduction of seminars.
8. No proper utilization of transformer winding machine by trainees.
9. No proper utilization of pneumatics and hydraulics labs by trainees.
19. No proper 5’s activities are followed in labs and classrooms by trainees.
20. Improper working of DTK’s and mp-kits.
21. No proper usage of daily dairy by trainees.
22. No proper guidance for visitors.
23. No proper awareness regarding new software.
24. No proper information regarding industries.
25. Non availability of components during extra labs.
26. Mis -utilization of library cards by trainees.
27. Wastage of time in collecting the components in labs.
28. No proper maintenance of class rooms.
29. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.
B- category
SAMARTH

32. -CATEGORY C34
SAMART
H

33. 1. No proper conduction of open forums.
2. Lack of experienced faculties.
3. No proper guidance for doing projects.
4. No proper transportation facilities for 1st years.
5. Non availability of lockers in 1st year campus.
6. No proper information regarding mess bills.
7. No updating of syllabus for IInd & IIIrd years.
8. Services like Xerox, printout etc, are not provided for trainees.
9. No proper equipments in physics lab for 1st year trainees.
10.No proper contact with other engineering collages.
11.No proper guidance from faculties during extra labs.
12.Lack of library facility for first year trainees.
25.Non availability of class rooms for extra classes.
26.No proper allocation of time for sports, to the trainees.
27.No proper net facility for second year trainees.
28.No proper co-curricular activities are conducted for trainees.
29.Insufficient no. of technical portraits in labs and class rooms.
c- category:SAMARTH

34. 18.No proper conduction of safety week.
19.Completion of syllabus is not done on time by the faculties.
20.Activities are not carried out as mentioned in the activity calendar.
21. Non availability of tools in workshop.
22. Lack of necessary books in library for trainees.
23. No fire alarm system in campus.
24. No proper information regarding the absence of faculties.
25. No lab manuals to guide the trainees.
26. Lack of components in analog lab II
27. Wastage of electricity in classrooms.
28. No hobby projects are allocated in 4th semester.
29. No drinking water facility in working area.
30. Non- availability of required software's.
31.Components are not issued in right time for projects.
32. Insufficient stationary items in general stores.
33. Time is not allocated for utilizing library facility.
34. Improper time management in conducting assembly.
c- category: SAMART
H

35. 1. No regular check up of suggestion box.
Sol: Allocating leaders to collect the suggestions and to inform the academic in-
charge for every month.
2. No updation of component status list in labs.
Sol: Updating the component status list in labs.
3. Lack of knowledge about the working of equipments in first year
trainees.
Sol: Preparing and pasting the checklist on each and every work bench.
4. No awareness, regarding the safety precautions to be followed in
workshop.
Sol: Preparing and pasting the safety precautions on the machines in the
workshop.
5. Lack of junction boxes in CP04 II year class rooms.
Sol: Provided junction boxes for CP04 II year class rooms.
6. No proper allocation of particular workbench to the trainees.
Sol: Preparation of seating sequence to the trainees in AE-I and AE-II labs.
SAMART
H
The problems which can be solved
then
& there, and their solutions

36. 1. High failure rate in practical's.
2. Lack of trouble shooting skills in trainees.
3. No improvement in the internal’s percentage level
of CP04 II year trainees.
4. Consuming more time for taking extra labs.
5. Lack of basic knowledge in trainees.
6. No proper interaction between seniors and
juniors.
7. Lack of component testers in analog electronics
lab-II.
SAMART
H
The problems which cannot be
solved
then & there

37. REPRESENTATION OF
SELECTED DATA IN THE
FORM OF
CHECK SHEET
SAMARTH

38. PROBLEM TALLY NO.OF
VOTES
CUMULATIVE
FREQUENCY
% CUMMULATIVE
%
1. No improvement in the
internal’s percentage level
of CP04 2nd year trainees
IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII
IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII
70 70 44.03 44.03
2.Lack of trouble shooting
skills in trainees.
IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII
IIII
35 105 22.01 66.04
3. Lack of basic knowledge
in trainees.
IIII IIII IIII IIII 19 124 11.95 77.99
4. Consuming more time for
taking extra labs.
IIII IIII III 13 137 8.18 86.17
5. High failure rate in
practical’s.
IIII IIII 10 147 6.29 92.46
6. No proper interaction
between seniors and
juniors.
IIII III 8 155 5.03 97.49
7. Lack of component IIII 4 159 2.51 100
CHECK SHEET SAMARTH

39. 0
10
20
30
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
140
130
10
20
30
90
80
70
60
50
40
92.46
44.03
66.04
86.17Vital few
Trivialmany
100
1 2 3 4 5 6
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
P
E
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
NO.OF PROBLEMS
70
35
19
13 10 08
77.79
150
160
04
97.49
7
1. No improvement in
the internal’s
percentage level of
CP-04 II year
trainees.
2. Lack of trouble
shooting skills in
trainees.
3. High failure rate in
practical's.
4. Consuming more
time for taking extra
labs.
5. Lack of basic
knowledge in
trainees.
6. No proper
interaction between
seniors and juniors.
7. Lack of components
in analog
electronics lab-II
PARETO CHART: SAMARTH

40. OUR PROBLEM:
NO IMPROVEMENT IN THE
INTERNAL’S PERCENTAGE
LEVEL OF CP04 II YEAR
TRAINEES.
SAMARTH

41. Definition of the
problem
STEP 3
SAMARTH

42. DEFINITION OF PROBLEM
By Considering the Statistics
(i.e., the Internal’s Percentage Level)
of CP04 II year Trainees from the
Exam Cell.
SAMARTH

43. P
E
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
Graph, representing the “THEORY”
internal’ s percentage level of past 3
batches of cpo4 II year.
SAMARTH
Batches

44. A Graph, representing the “PRACTICAL”
internal’s percentage level of past 3
cpo4 II year batches.
P
E
R
C
E
N
T
A
G
E
SAMARTH
Batches

45. We aim,
To Improve the
Internal ‘s Percentage
Level of CP04 II
year trainees.
SAMARTH

46. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Analysis of the
problem
Cause and
effect analysis
Root cause
analysis
Data analysis on
root cause
Development of
solutions
Foreseeing
probable
resistances
Trial
implementation
Regular
implementation
Follow up
review
Meeting noSteps
Milestone chart SAMARTH

47. STEP 4
SAMARTH
Analysis Of The
Problem

48. What is the problem?
No improvement in the internal’s percentage level of
CP04 II year trainees.
When does it occur?
During an academic year.
Where does it occur ?
In internal’s percentage level of CP04 II year trainees.
Who are affected ?
Second year trainees are affected.
How does it effect ?
No decrement in the backlogs of trainees.
4W 1H Analysis SAMARTH

49. STEP 5
SAMARTH
CAUSE AND
EFFECT ANALYSIS

50. Material
Wastage of time
in collecting the
components
from other
labs.
Wastage of time
to get the
belongings in
between the
class hours.
Wastage of time to
arrange stationary,
junction boxes and OHP
for the classes.
Consumption of time in
identifying working and
non working
components.
Inefficient utilization of
working hours by
trainees.
Insufficient time for
doing experiment
by the trainees.
Wastage of time in collecting the
belongings in between the classes.
Utilization the lab hours for
completion of the records.
Trainees are not
attending the class
on time.
ManMachine
Required
software's for
the trainees
are not installed
in systems.
Trainees are not sure
that whether the existing
component testers are
working
or not
No proper outcome in
labs due to increase in
non working
equipments .
Interruptions
occurring
during practical
session.
No
engagement
of classes in
the absence of
concerned
faculties.
Consumption of time for
the trainees to get his
doubts cleared for doing the
further experiment.
Wastage of time for
submission of files
& records.
Method
No
improve
ment in
the
internal’s
% level
of CP04
2nd year
trainees
SAMARTH

51. Inefficient
utilization of
working hours by
trainees.
Insufficient time for
doing experiment by
the trainees.
Utilization the lab
hours for completion
of records.
Variation of time in clocks in
our institute.
In ability to manage
the time by trainees.
Lockers are not kept
in the required
places.
Wastage of time for
giving daily
attendances.
Trainees are unable
to complete the
assignments in the
allocated time.
Trainees are not
attending the class
on time.
Wastage of
time in
collecting the
belongings in
between the
classes.
There is no centralized
timing system.
Utilization more
time than the
allocated time
for a particular
activity.
Trainees are not following the
lab procedure.
MAN
SAMARTH

52. Mishandling the
equipments by
trainees .
Improper
maintenance
of working
equipments.
No proper
maintenance record
regarding the testers
available in lab.
No knowledge
about the
working of
equipments.
No proper
calibration of
the working
equipments.
MACHINE
No proper outcome
in labs due to
increase in non
working equipments.
Required
software's for
the trainees are
not installed in
systems.
Trainees are unable
to identify whether
the existing
component testers
are in working
condition.
SAMARTH

53. Wastage of time to
get the belongings in
between the class
hours.
Consumption of time in
identifying working and
non working
components.
Wastage of time
to arrange
stationary items,
junction boxes
and OHP for the
classes.
Wastage of time
in collecting the
components
from other labs.
No proper component
testers available in lab.
Non-availability of
required components
in particular lab.
Lockers are not kept near the
classrooms
.
Stationary, OHP and
junction boxes are not
kept in class room.
No arrangement to keep
stationary, OHP and
junction boxes safely .
Trainees are not knowing, how to
check the components.MATERIAL
SAMARTH

54. No time
allocated to
submit records
and files.
No information regarding
the absence of faculties.
No proper time allocated
for the cleaner to clean
the lab.
Allocation of theory
classes during lab hours to
the faculties.
No allocation of other faculties to
guide the trainees in absence of
particular subject in charge.
No engagement of
classes in the
absence of
concerned faculties.
Interruptions
occurring
during practical
session.
Due to power
failure.
Wastage of time
for submission of
files & records.
Consumption of time for
the trainees to get his
doubts cleared for doing
the further experiment.
SAMARTH
METHOD

55. Validation of causes
-MAJOR
-NEGLIGIBLE
-MINOR
SAMARTH

56. Validation of causes
1. Inefficient utilization of working hrs by trainees.
2. Wastage of time to arrange junction boxes, stationary items & OHP’s for the classes.
3. Trainees are unable to identify whether the existing component testers are in working
condition.
4. No engagement of classes in the absence of concerned faculties.
MAJOR:
MINOR:
1. Insufficient time for doing experiments by the trainees.
2. Wastage of time collecting the belongings in between the classes.
3. No proper outcome in labs due to increases in non-working equipments.
4. Consumption of time for the trainees to get his doubts cleared for doing the further
experiment.
5. Wastage of time collecting the components from other labs.
NEGLIGIBLE:
1. Utilizing the lab hours for completion of the records.
2. Trainees are not attending the class on time.
3. Required software's for the trainees are not installed in systems.
4. Wastage of time to get the belongings in between class hours.
5. Consumption of time in identifying the working and non working components.
6. Interruption happening during practical session.
7. Wastage of time for submission of files & records.
SAMARTH

57. STEP6
WHY ? WHY ? Analysis
SAMARTH
Root Cause
Analysis

58. Inefficient utilization of working hours by
trainees.
In ability to follow right time by trainees.
Variation of time in clocks in our institution.
No proper check up of timings in all the
clocks in our institution .
WHY???
WHY???
WHY???
For 1st major cause
SAMARTH

59. Wastage of time to arrange junction boxes
stationary items and OHP’s for the class
rooms .
WHY???
OHP’s junction boxes ,stationary items are not
kept in class rooms.
WHY???
No arrangements made to maintain OHP’s
junction boxes and stationary items safely in
For 2nd major cause SAMARTH

60. Trainees are unable to identify whether the
existing components testers are in
working condition.
WHY???
No proper maintenance record regarding the testers
available in lab.
WHY???
No regular maintenance for the component
testers.
For 3rd major cause
SAMARTH

61. For 4th Major cause
No engagement of classes in the absence of
concerned faculties.
WHY???
No information regarding the absence of faculties
.
WHY???
No one is allocated for checking the absence of
faculty.
SAMARTH

62. Data Analysis On
Root Cause
STEP7
SAMARTH

63. SLNO CAUSES
VOTES GIVEN
BY TRAINEES
VOTES IN
PERCENTAGE
1. Inefficient utilization of working
hours by trainees. 92 57.86%
2. Wastage of time to arrange junction
boxes ,stationary items and
OHP’s for the class rooms . 38 23.9%
3. No regular maintenance for the
component testers. 21 13.21%
4. No one is allocated for checking the
absence of faculty. 8 5.03%
DATA FOR INDIVIDUAL CAUSES: SAMARTH

64. Graphical representation
of data
SAMARTH
CAUSES
57.86%
23.9%
13.21%
5.03%

65. 2.50pm-
4.50pm
• Practical
session
WORKING Schedule of CP04
II year trainees
Break
10.00am-10.10am
Lunch break
12:10pm-12:40pm
Break
2:40pm-2:50pm
The same procedure is followed alternately for
the other batches of CP04 II year trainees.
Arranging OHP
7.55 am- 8.00am
SAMART
H

66. How the time is exactly
getting wasted
SAMARTH

67. SAMARTH
Activities Actual
Time(min.)
Utilized
Time(min.)
Wastage
of time(min.)
Allocating
OHP
0 5 5
T-Break 10 25 15
Lunch break 30 50 20
T-Break 10 25 15
Allocation of
faculties
0 10 10
Identifying
components
0 10 10
TOTAL WASTAGE OF TIME :1 Hr. 15mins.
AVERAGE WASTAGE OF TIME PER DAY:

68. SAMARTH
So by this, trainees are wasting 5 min
from the first hour of the theory session.
Allocated time for
arranging OHP:
7:55am – 8:00am
Utilized time for
arranging OHP :
7:55am -8.05am
Wastage of time during working hours:

69. SAMARTH
69
So by this trainees are wasting 15 mins from
the 3rd hour of the theory session.
Allocated time for break:
10:00am – 10:10am
Utilized time for break:
10:00am -10.25am
Wastage of time during working hours:

70. SAMARTH
By this trainees are wasting 20min from the next
practical session
Allocated time for lunch:
12:10pm -12:40pm
Utilized time for lunch:
12:10pm - 1.00pm
Wastage of time during working hours:

71. SAMARTH
71By this trainees are wasting 15min from the next
practical session
Allocated time for break:
2:40pm – 2:50pm
Utilized time for break:
2:40pm -3:05pm
Wastage of time during working hours:

72. SAMARTH
By this, its clear
that the wastage
of time is “1Hr.15
Mins” per day.

73. SAMARTH
“Moments unfold into hours,
Hours unfold into days,
Days unfold into months,
Months unfold into years
&
Years unfold into lifetime”.
“If you waste even a moment
you end up wasting a life”

74. So, we decided to solve
this wastage of time
“1Hr.15Mins”
by developing a solution.
SAMARTH

75. STEP 8
Develop
ment
of
SAMARTH

76. SAMARTH
Taking initiatives by trainees to set the clock.
Informing Faculties Regarding Classes Through
Software
Developing alarm system in our institute.
By Designing centralized timing system in our
institute.
List of solutions

77. Graphical representation of data
SAMARTH
SOLUTIONS
1st solution
2nd solution
3rd solution
4th solution
50.32%
23.9%
16.98%
8.8%

78. Samarth
Centralized
Timing System
Our Project:
SAMART
H

79. SAMARTH
Demonstration
of the
project
SAMARTH

80. SAMARTH
PDCA cycle:

81. SAMARTH
PROCEDURE FOLLOWED FOR
THE PROJECT “SCTS”

82. SCTS
SAMARTH

83. SAMARTH
Printed circuit board 50RS
chassis 100RS
components 200RS
Total cost estimation 350RS
PROJECT COST ESTIMATION

84. Solving one cause will not solve
the problem completely.
So we designed the solutions for
other causes also as follows..
SAMARTH

85. Cause 2: Wastage of time to arrange junction boxes
stationary items and OHP’s for the class rooms .
Equipments Maintenance List
Batch :
Date of updating :
Signature :
(Class Representative)
Equipments Equipment no Status
OHP
Junction Box
For this , we allocated OHP’s , junction boxes,& stationary items to
the class rooms permanently, and prepared a maintenance list for
that.
SAMART
H

86. Cause 3: Trainees are unable to identify whether the existing
component tester are in working condition.
So, We solved this cause by Implementing Maintenance Record of Component
Testers
SAMARTH

87. No Engagement of classes in absence of allocated faculties
We solved this cause by preparing a faculties
SAMARTHCause4:

88. SAMARTH
Sl.no Activity done Done by days
01 Digital clock
Rajesh
Abdul 10
02 Allocation charts
Geethika
Angel 01
03 Check sheet
Philemon
Monisha 01
04 Development of
maintenance records
Angel
Darshan 02
05 Data collection all _
Activity plan sheet

89. STEP 9
Foreseeing Probable
Resistances
SAMARTH

90. SAMARTH
1.If power faIls how the clock works.
we provided the backup circuit for the clock.
2.If there Is varIatIon In tIme due to mal-
functIonIng of the clock.
we provided the facility to set the time
manually.
3.If the power faIls the cIrcuIt may consume
more power for the backup provIded.
we have provided a logic circuit for consuming
less power so that it will have a long backup.
Probable Resistances:

91. 4.If ohp’s and junctIon boxes are not workIng what
can be done.
we have provided maintenance report for testing OHP’s
and junction boxes every weekend.
5.If traInees are not knowIng how to work wIth the
testers.
we have provided guidelines for each component
testers to the trainees.
6.If class representatIve Is absent how the work
contInues.
we have allocated substitute for doing that particular
work.
SAMARTH

92. STEP 10
SAMARTH
TRIAL
IMPLEMENTATION

93. Progress of trainees
Before & after
implementation of
“SCTS”
SAMARTH

94. SAMARTH
In efficient utilization of
working hours by trainees.
Trainees are utilizing
working hours efficiently
and effectively.
1.Before implementation After implementation
Progress of trainees:

95. SAMARTH
Wastage of time in arranging
OHP’s junction boxes and
stationary items for classes.
There is no wastage of time in
arranging OHP’s junction box
and stationary items for the
class rooms.
2. Before implementation After implementation

96. SAMARTH
Trainees were unable to
identify whether the existing
component testers are
Trainees are sure that the
particular component testers are
working by seeing the
3.Before implementation After implementation

97. SAMARTH
No engagement of classes
in the absence of
concerned faculty.
Classes are engaged with
the substitution of absence
faculty.
4.Before implementation After implementation

98. SAMARTH
percentage
61.33%
86.12%
67.8%
65%
89.36%
THEORY PRACTICAL
60.46%
Increment internal’s percentage level
of CP-04 II year trainees.

99. We achieved our target by improving the
average internal’s Percentage level from
63.64% 87.74%
SAMARTH

100. STEP 11
Regular Implementation
SAMARTH
On 30th March 2010

101. TANGIBLE GAINS
Efficient utilization of working hours by
trainees.
No wastage of time for arranging OHP’s,
Junction box for the class room.
Time is utilized by the trainees with the
substitution of absence of faculty.
SAMARTH

102. we improved our thinking power.
Increased our communication skills.
Increased our Presentation Skills.
Developed our team work.
Developed leadership quality.
Can identify easily the component tester.
INTANGIBLE GAINS
SAMARTH

103. STEP 12
FOLLOW UP REVIEW
SAMARTH

104. STANDARDIZATION:
SAMARTH
Records regarding Samarth Centralized
Timing System (SCTS).
Maintenance record for junction boxes,
OHP’s.
Implementing check list.
Maintenance record for component tester.

105. SAMARTH
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Analysis of the
problem
Cause and effect
analysis
Root cause
analysis
Data analysis on
root cause
Development of
solutions
Foreseeing
probable
resistances
Trial
implementation
Regular
implementation
Follow up review
Meeting noSteps
Milestone chart

106. SAMARTH
Future problem:
Lack of trouble shooting
skills in trainees

107. SAMARTH
QC tools used
Sl.no QC tools
01 Pareto chart
02 Check sheet
03 Graphs
04 Cause & Effect diagram
05 Process Decision Program Chart (PDPC)
06 Matrix diagram

108. SAMARTH
THANK
YOU

109. any
QuIres ???????.
SAMARTH