The document discusses microspheres as a drug delivery system. It defines microspheres as small spherical particles ranging from 1μm to 1000μm that can be used to deliver drugs in a sustained, controlled release fashion. Various methods for producing microspheres are described, including single emulsion, double emulsion, phase separation, spray drying, and ionotropic gelation. The properties, mechanisms, types, and applications of microspheres are summarized. Evaluation methods for microspheres such as particle size, drug loading, and in vitro release are also outlined.
Controlled Release Oral Drug Delivery System
Controlled drug delivery is one which delivers the drug at a predetermined rate, for locally or systemically, for a specified period of time.
Controlled Release Oral Drug Delivery System
Controlled drug delivery is one which delivers the drug at a predetermined rate, for locally or systemically, for a specified period of time.
Approaches Of Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System or GRDDSAkshayPatane
Approaches Of Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System
Includes:
Floating and Non-Floating drug delivery system with their subtypes
Like Non-effervescent system, Effervescent system, Raft forming system,
High Density system, Expandable system, Muco-adhesive system,
Super porous hydrogel system and Magnetic Systems, etc.
This presentation includes introduction, physiology of GIT, factors affecting GRDDS, Advantages and disadvantages, approaches to GRDDS and their mechanism, some of the marketed products using GRDDS mechanism.
Gastro retentive drug delivery system (GRDDS)Ravish Yadav
gastro retentive drug delivery system topic include
1. introduction
2.advantages
3.technology
4.evaluation
5.disadvantages
6. matrix tablet
and other relative information regarding the topic
NIOSOMES , GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NIOSOME , TYPES OF NIOSOMES , OTHERS TYPES OF NIOSOMES , NIOSOMES VS LIPOSOMES , COMPONENTS OF NIOSOMES , Non-ionic surfactant , Cholesterol , Charge inducing molecule , METHOD OF PREPARATION , preparation of small unilamellar vesicles , Sonication , Micro fluidization , preparation of large unilamellar vesicles , Reverse Phase Evaporation , Ether Injection , preparation of Multilamellar vesicles , Hand shaking method , Trans membrane pH gradient drug uptake process (remote loading) , Miscellaneous method :Multiple membrane extrusion method , The “Bubble” Method , Formation of Niosomes From Proniosomes , SEPARATION OF UNENTRAPPED DRUGS , Gel Filtration , Dialysis , Centrifugation , FACTORS AFFECTING THE PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF NIOSOMES , Membrane Additives , Temperature of Hydration , PROPERTIES OF DRUGS , AMOUNT AND TYPE OF SURFACTANT
Structure of Surfactants , Resistance to Osmotic Stress , Characterization of niosomes ,Therapeutic applications of Niosomes , For Controlled Release of Drugs , To Improve the Stability and Physical Properties of the Drugs , For Targeting and Retention of Drug in Blood Circulation , Proniosomes , Aspasomes , Vesicles in Water and Oil System (v/w/o) ,Bola - niosomes , Discomes , Deformable niosomes or elastic niosomes , According to the nature of lamellarity ,Small Unilamellar vesicles (SUV) 25 – 500 nm in size.,Large Unilamellar vesicles (LUV) 0.1 – 1μm in size , Multilamellar vesicles (MLV) 1-5 μm in size , According to the size:Small Niosomes (100 nm – 200 nm) , Large Niosomes (800 nm – 900 nm),Big Niosomes (2 μm – 4 μm)
Mucoadhesive drug delivery system interact with the mucus layer covering the mucosal epithelial surface, & mucin molecules & increase the residence time of the dosage form at the site of the absorption.
Mucoadhesive drug delivery system is a part of controlled delivery system.
Since the early 1980,the concept of Mucoadhesion has gained considerable interest in pharmaceutical technology.
combine mucoadhesive with enzyme inhibitory & penetration enhancer properties & improve the patient complaince.
MDDS have been devloped for buccal ,nasal,rectal &vaginal routes for both systemic & local effects.
Hydrophilic high mol. wt. such as peptides that cannot be administered & poor absorption ,then MDDS is best choice.
Mucoadhesiveinner layers called mucosa inner epithelial cell lining is covered with viscoelasticfluid
Composed of water and mucin.
Thickness varies from 40 μm to 300 μm
General composition of mucus
Water…………………………………..95%
Glycoproteinsand lipids……………..0.5-5%
Mineral salts……………………………1%
Free proteins…………………………..0.5-1%
The mechanism responsible in the formation of mucoadhesive bond
Step 1 : Wetting and swelling of the polymer(contact stage)
Step 2 : Interpenetration between the polymer chains and the mucosal membrane
Step 3 : Formation of bonds between the entangled chains (both known as consolidation stage)
Electronic theory
Wetting theory
Adsorption theory
Diffusion theory
Fracture theory
Advantages over other controlled oral controlled release systems by virtue of prolongation of residence of drug in GIT.
Targeting & localization of the dosage form at a specific site
-Painless administration.
-Low enzymatic activity & avoid of first pass metabolism
If MDDS are adhere too tightlgy because it is undesirable to exert too much force to remove the formulation after use,otherwise the mucosa could be injured.
-Some patient suffers unpleasent feeling.
-Unfortunately ,the lack of standardized techniques often leads to unclear results.
-costly drug delivery system
In this ppt ,i have covered the introduction of microspheres,various preparation methods of microspheres, advantages and disadvantage of microspheres,types and evaluation parameters of the microspheres.
microspheres,types, advantages and disadvantages,methods of preparation, evaluation or characterization of microspheres and applications of microspheres in various pharmaceutical fields.
Approaches Of Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System or GRDDSAkshayPatane
Approaches Of Gastro-Retentive Drug Delivery System
Includes:
Floating and Non-Floating drug delivery system with their subtypes
Like Non-effervescent system, Effervescent system, Raft forming system,
High Density system, Expandable system, Muco-adhesive system,
Super porous hydrogel system and Magnetic Systems, etc.
This presentation includes introduction, physiology of GIT, factors affecting GRDDS, Advantages and disadvantages, approaches to GRDDS and their mechanism, some of the marketed products using GRDDS mechanism.
Gastro retentive drug delivery system (GRDDS)Ravish Yadav
gastro retentive drug delivery system topic include
1. introduction
2.advantages
3.technology
4.evaluation
5.disadvantages
6. matrix tablet
and other relative information regarding the topic
NIOSOMES , GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NIOSOME , TYPES OF NIOSOMES , OTHERS TYPES OF NIOSOMES , NIOSOMES VS LIPOSOMES , COMPONENTS OF NIOSOMES , Non-ionic surfactant , Cholesterol , Charge inducing molecule , METHOD OF PREPARATION , preparation of small unilamellar vesicles , Sonication , Micro fluidization , preparation of large unilamellar vesicles , Reverse Phase Evaporation , Ether Injection , preparation of Multilamellar vesicles , Hand shaking method , Trans membrane pH gradient drug uptake process (remote loading) , Miscellaneous method :Multiple membrane extrusion method , The “Bubble” Method , Formation of Niosomes From Proniosomes , SEPARATION OF UNENTRAPPED DRUGS , Gel Filtration , Dialysis , Centrifugation , FACTORS AFFECTING THE PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF NIOSOMES , Membrane Additives , Temperature of Hydration , PROPERTIES OF DRUGS , AMOUNT AND TYPE OF SURFACTANT
Structure of Surfactants , Resistance to Osmotic Stress , Characterization of niosomes ,Therapeutic applications of Niosomes , For Controlled Release of Drugs , To Improve the Stability and Physical Properties of the Drugs , For Targeting and Retention of Drug in Blood Circulation , Proniosomes , Aspasomes , Vesicles in Water and Oil System (v/w/o) ,Bola - niosomes , Discomes , Deformable niosomes or elastic niosomes , According to the nature of lamellarity ,Small Unilamellar vesicles (SUV) 25 – 500 nm in size.,Large Unilamellar vesicles (LUV) 0.1 – 1μm in size , Multilamellar vesicles (MLV) 1-5 μm in size , According to the size:Small Niosomes (100 nm – 200 nm) , Large Niosomes (800 nm – 900 nm),Big Niosomes (2 μm – 4 μm)
Mucoadhesive drug delivery system interact with the mucus layer covering the mucosal epithelial surface, & mucin molecules & increase the residence time of the dosage form at the site of the absorption.
Mucoadhesive drug delivery system is a part of controlled delivery system.
Since the early 1980,the concept of Mucoadhesion has gained considerable interest in pharmaceutical technology.
combine mucoadhesive with enzyme inhibitory & penetration enhancer properties & improve the patient complaince.
MDDS have been devloped for buccal ,nasal,rectal &vaginal routes for both systemic & local effects.
Hydrophilic high mol. wt. such as peptides that cannot be administered & poor absorption ,then MDDS is best choice.
Mucoadhesiveinner layers called mucosa inner epithelial cell lining is covered with viscoelasticfluid
Composed of water and mucin.
Thickness varies from 40 μm to 300 μm
General composition of mucus
Water…………………………………..95%
Glycoproteinsand lipids……………..0.5-5%
Mineral salts……………………………1%
Free proteins…………………………..0.5-1%
The mechanism responsible in the formation of mucoadhesive bond
Step 1 : Wetting and swelling of the polymer(contact stage)
Step 2 : Interpenetration between the polymer chains and the mucosal membrane
Step 3 : Formation of bonds between the entangled chains (both known as consolidation stage)
Electronic theory
Wetting theory
Adsorption theory
Diffusion theory
Fracture theory
Advantages over other controlled oral controlled release systems by virtue of prolongation of residence of drug in GIT.
Targeting & localization of the dosage form at a specific site
-Painless administration.
-Low enzymatic activity & avoid of first pass metabolism
If MDDS are adhere too tightlgy because it is undesirable to exert too much force to remove the formulation after use,otherwise the mucosa could be injured.
-Some patient suffers unpleasent feeling.
-Unfortunately ,the lack of standardized techniques often leads to unclear results.
-costly drug delivery system
In this ppt ,i have covered the introduction of microspheres,various preparation methods of microspheres, advantages and disadvantage of microspheres,types and evaluation parameters of the microspheres.
microspheres,types, advantages and disadvantages,methods of preparation, evaluation or characterization of microspheres and applications of microspheres in various pharmaceutical fields.
Microspheres are small spherical particles, with diameter 1 µm to 1000 µm.
They are spherical free flowing particles consisting of proteins or synthetic polymers which are biodegradable in nature.
Microspheres Preparation and Evaluations.pptxRAHUL PAL
Microspheres are small spherical particles with diameters from 1 to 1000 μm. In some cases, microspheres are also known as microparticles. Microspheres can be produced from several natural and synthetic polymeric materials or even from inorganic materials
ABSTRACT Gliclazide microspheres were prepared by ionotropic gelation method using bioadhesive polymers such as sodium alginate, carbopol 934, carbopol 971, HPMC K4M in different ratios. Totally twelve different formulations of gliclazide were prepared by using the above polymers. The microspheres were characterized for drug content, entrapment efficiency, swelling index, mucoadhesive property by In vitro wash-off test and in-vitro drug release. The results of this investigation indicate that ionic cross linking technique Ionotropic gelation method can be successfully employed to fabricate Model drug microspheres. Micrometric studies revealed that the mean particle size of the prepared microspheres was in the size range of 512-903 μm and are suitable for bioadhesive microspheres for oral administration. The in-vitro mucoadhesive study demonstrated that microspheres of Model drug using sodium alginate along with Carbopol 934 as copolymer adhered to the mucus to a greater extent than the microspheres of Model drug using sodium alginate along with Carbopol 971 and HPMC K4Mas copolymers. Analysis of drug release mechanism showed that the drug release from the formulations followed non-Fickian diffusion and the best fit model was found to be Korsmeyer-Peppas. Based on the results of evaluation tests formulation coded T4 was concluded as best formulation. Keywords: Bioadhesive Microspheres, Gliclazide, Ionotropic gelation method.
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
Knee anatomy and clinical tests 2024.pdfvimalpl1234
This includes all relevant anatomy and clinical tests compiled from standard textbooks, Campbell,netter etc..It is comprehensive and best suited for orthopaedicians and orthopaedic residents.
NVBDCP.pptx Nation vector borne disease control programSapna Thakur
NVBDCP was launched in 2003-2004 . Vector-Borne Disease: Disease that results from an infection transmitted to humans and other animals by blood-feeding arthropods, such as mosquitoes, ticks, and fleas. Examples of vector-borne diseases include Dengue fever, West Nile Virus, Lyme disease, and malaria.
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Saeid Safari
Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists like Ozempic and Semiglutide
ASA GUIDELINE
NYSORA Guideline
2 Case Reports of Gastric Ultrasound
Ethanol (CH3CH2OH), or beverage alcohol, is a two-carbon alcohol
that is rapidly distributed in the body and brain. Ethanol alters many
neurochemical systems and has rewarding and addictive properties. It
is the oldest recreational drug and likely contributes to more morbidity,
mortality, and public health costs than all illicit drugs combined. The
5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-5) integrates alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence into a single
disorder called alcohol use disorder (AUD), with mild, moderate,
and severe subclassifications (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
In the DSM-5, all types of substance abuse and dependence have been
combined into a single substance use disorder (SUD) on a continuum
from mild to severe. A diagnosis of AUD requires that at least two of
the 11 DSM-5 behaviors be present within a 12-month period (mild
AUD: 2–3 criteria; moderate AUD: 4–5 criteria; severe AUD: 6–11 criteria).
The four main behavioral effects of AUD are impaired control over
drinking, negative social consequences, risky use, and altered physiological
effects (tolerance, withdrawal). This chapter presents an overview
of the prevalence and harmful consequences of AUD in the U.S.,
the systemic nature of the disease, neurocircuitry and stages of AUD,
comorbidities, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, genetic risk factors, and
pharmacotherapies for AUD.
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...kevinkariuki227
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,sisternakatoto
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group of receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a teamof receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a team wwww.lisywomensclinic.co.za/
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnatakaaddon Scans
As flu season approaches, health officials in Bangalore, Karnataka, are urging residents to get their flu vaccinations. The seasonal flu, while common, can lead to severe health complications, particularly for vulnerable populations such as young children, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.
Dr. Vidisha Kumari, a leading epidemiologist in Bangalore, emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. "The flu vaccine is our best defense against the influenza virus. It not only protects individuals but also helps prevent the spread of the virus in our communities," he says.
This year, the flu season is expected to coincide with a potential increase in other respiratory illnesses. The Karnataka Health Department has launched an awareness campaign highlighting the significance of flu vaccinations. They have set up multiple vaccination centers across Bangalore, making it convenient for residents to receive their shots.
To encourage widespread vaccination, the government is also collaborating with local schools, workplaces, and community centers to facilitate vaccination drives. Special attention is being given to ensuring that the vaccine is accessible to all, including marginalized communities who may have limited access to healthcare.
Residents are reminded that the flu vaccine is safe and effective. Common side effects are mild and may include soreness at the injection site, mild fever, or muscle aches. These side effects are generally short-lived and far less severe than the flu itself.
Healthcare providers are also stressing the importance of continuing COVID-19 precautions. Wearing masks, practicing good hand hygiene, and maintaining social distancing are still crucial, especially in crowded places.
Protect yourself and your loved ones by getting vaccinated. Together, we can help keep Bangalore healthy and safe this flu season. For more information on vaccination centers and schedules, residents can visit the Karnataka Health Department’s official website or follow their social media pages.
Stay informed, stay safe, and get your flu shot today!
3. • The oral route is considered as the most promising route of drug
delivery. Conventional drug delivery system achieves as well as
maintains the drug concentration within the therapeutically effective
range needed for treatment, only when taken several times a day.
• There are various approaches in delivering a therapeutic susbstance to
the target site in sustained controlled release fashion using
microspheres as carrier for drug
• Administration of drugs in the form of microspheres usually improves
the treatment by providing the localization of the active substances at
the site of action & by prolonging the release of drugs.
3
4. DEFINATIONOF MICROSPHERES:-
Microspheres are defined as Monolithic sphere or therapeutic agent
distributed throughout the matrix either as a molecular dispersion of
particles or can be defined as structure made up of continuous phase
of one or more miscible polymers in which drug particles are
dispersed at the molecular or macroscopic level.
Microspheres are small particles with diameters in the micrometer
range(typically1µm to 1000µm).
Microspheres are sometimes referred to as
microparticles.
4
5. I. It should incorporate reasonably high concentrations of the drug.
II. Stability of the preparation after synthesis with acceptable shelf
life.
III. Controlled particle size and solubility in aqueous vehicles for
injection.
IV. Release of active pharmaceutical reagent with a good control over
a wide time scale.
V. Compatibility with a controllable biodegradability.
VI. Susceptible to chemical modification.
5
6. I. Microspheres provide constant and prolonged
therapeutic effect.
II. Reduces the dosing frequency and there by improve the
patient compliance.
III. They could be injected into the body due to the
spherical shape and smaller size.
IV. Better drug utilization will improve the bioavailability
and reduce the incidence or intensity of adverse effects. 6
7. I. The release rate of the controlled release dosage form
may vary from a variety of factors like food and the rate
of transit though gut.
II. Differences in the release rate from one dose to another.
III. Controlled release formulations generally contain a
higher drug load and thus any loss of integrity of the
release characteristics of the dosage form may lead to
potential toxicity.
IV. Dosage forms of this kind should not be crushed or
chewed.
7
8. For Taste and odour masking.
To delay the volatilization.
For Separation of incompatible substances.
For Improvement of flow properties of powders.
To Increase the stability of the drug against the external
conditions.
To Increase half life of drug.
8
9. For Safe handling of toxic substances.
To improve the solubility of water insoluble substances by
incorporating dispersion of such material in aqueous media.
To reduce the dose dumping potential compared to large
implantable devices.
For conversion of oils and other liquids to solids for ease of
handling.
9
11. 11
POLYMER MECHANISM
Modified starch, HPMC, Carbopol Slower release of drug
Ethyl cellulose Controlled release for longer period of
time
PLGA, Chitosan Vaccine delivery
Magnetic polystyrene microspheres Specific cell labeling
Chitosan coated PIGA microspheres Targeted drug delivery
11
-
12. 1. Bio adhesive microsphere
2. Magnetic microspheres
3. Floating microspheres
4. Radioactive microsphere
5. Polymeric microsphere
12
13. Single emulsion based method
Double emulsion based method
Phase seperation method
Spray drying and spray congealing method
Polymerization technique
Emulsification-Solvent evaporation method
Ionotropic gelation method 13
14. 14
SINGLE EMULSION BASED METHOD
Aq.Solution/suspension of polymer
Dispersion in organic phase
(Oil/Chloroform)
Microspheres in organic phase Microspheres in organic phase
MICROSPHERES
Stirring, Sonication
CROSS LINKING
Chemical cross linking
(Glutaraldehyde/Formald
ehyde/ButanolHeat denaturation
Centrifugation, Washing, Separation
15. 15
Aq.Solution of protein/polymer
First emulsion (W/O)
MICROSPHERES
Dispersion in oil/organic phase
Homogenization
Separation, Washing, Drying
Addition of aq. Solution of PVA
Addition to large aq. Phase
Denaturation/hardening
Multiple emulsion
Microspheres in solution
DOUBLE EMULSION BASED METHOD
16. 16
PHASE SEPARATION METHOD
Aqueous/Organic.Solution of polymer
Drug dispersed or dissolved in polymer solution
MICROSPHERES
Drug
Separation, Washing, Drying
Hardening
Polymer rich globules
Microspheres in aq./organic phase
17. SPRAY DRYING AND SPRAY
CONGEALING METHOD
Polymer dissolve in volatile organic solvent (acetone, dichloromethane)
Drug dispersed in polymer solution under high speed homogenization
Atomized in a stream of hot air
Due to solvent evaporation small droplet or fine mist form
Leads to formation of Microspheres
Microspheres separated from hot air by cyclone separator,
Trace of solvent are removed by vacuum drying
17
18. INTERFACIAL POLYMERIZATION TECHNIQUE
When two reactive monomers are
dissolved in immiscible solvents,
the monomers diffuse to the oil- water
interface where they react to
form a polymeric membrane that
envelopes dispersed phase.
Drug is incorporated either by being
dissolved in the polymerization medium or by adsorption onto the
nanoparticles after polymerization completed.
The nanoparticle suspension is then purified to remove various
stabilizers and surfactants employed for polymerization by
ultracentrifugation and re- suspending the particles in an isotonic
surfactant-free medium.
18
20. Drug is dispersed in organic solvent
(water miscible organic solvent such as Isopropanol)
Polymer in organic solvent
Organic phase is removed by extraction with water .
(This process decreasing hardening time for microspheres)
Hardened microspheres
20
21. IONOTROPIC GELATION METHOD
Alginate particulate system for suitable drug release was
prepared using this technique.
Qt drug in aqueous solution of sodium alginate.
To the complete solution stirring is continued
Added drop wise to a solution containing Ca2+ /Al3+
Microspheres
which wereformed were kept in original solution for 24 hr for
internal gellification by filteration for separation.
21
22. 1)PARTICLE SIZE AND SHAPE
It can be determined by
conventional light microscopy
scanning electron microscopy
Confocal laser scanning microscopy
Confocal fluorescence microscopy
Laser light scattering and multisize coulter counter
2)YIELD VALUES AND LOADING EFFICIENCY:
Yield value = 100 x Obtained wt. Of microspheres
Theoretical wt to be prepared
Loading = 100 x actual amt. of drug obtained by extraction effeciency
theoretical wt. of drug added in preparation 22
23. 3) DENSITY DETERMINATION
Measured by using a Multivolume psychnometer.
4) ISOELECTRIC POINT
The microelectrophoresis is an apparatus used to
measure the electophoretic mobility of microspheres
from which isoelectric point can be determined.
5) RELEASE STUDIES
1)Rotating paddle apparatus
2)Dialysis method
6)ANGLE OF CONTACT
Determine wetting property of microparticulate carrier.
23
24. 7) X-ray diffraction
Change in crystalinity of drug can be determined by this
technique. Scanning range angle between 8 0C - 70 0C. Scan
speed -4o/min Scintillation
8) Stability studies:-
microspheres in screw capped glass container and stored
them at following conditions:
1. Ambient humid condition
2. Room temperature (27+/-2 0C)
3. Oven temperature (40+/-2 0C)
4. Refrigerator (5 0C -80C).
It was carried out of a 60 days and the drug content of the
microsphere was analysed.
24
25. The polyelectrolyte shell was prepared by incorporating chitosan of
different molecular weight into the W2 phase and the resulting particles
were determined by zeta potential measurement.
The drug polymer interaction and also degradation of drug while
processing for microencapsulation can be determined by FTIR.
Accurately the sample was weighed and heated on alumina pan
at constant rate of 10oC/min under nitrogen flow of 40 ml/min.
25
26. IN VIVO METHODS:-
a. Animal models
Animal used: dog, rabbits, rat, cat,
hamster, pigs, and sheep
RAT: The oesophagus is ligated to
prevent absorption pathways other than
oral mucosa
At different time intervals, the blood is
withdrawn and analysed
b. Buccal absorption test
26
28. 1) Kataria S., Middha A., Sandhu P., Bilandi A.,
Kapoor B. Microsphere: A Review. Inter. J. Res.
Pharm. Chem. 2011,1(4) .
2) Parmar H., Bakliwal S, Gujarathi N, Rane B, Pawar S. Different methods of formulation
and evaluation of Mucoadhesive microsphere. Int. J.Bio Phrm.Tec. Nov-Dec -2010I(3),.
3) Singh C, Purohit S, Singh M, Pandey B.L.. Design and Evaluation of microsphere: A
Review. Journal of drug delivery research. 2013,2 (2).
4)Shivhare U.D., Tijare P.M. Formulation and characterization of Microspheres of selected
Anti-infective agent for Urinary tract Infection. Journal of drug delivery research. 2013,2
(1).
5)Ramteke K.H, Jadhav V.B, Dhole S.N. Microspheres: as carrieres used for novel drug
delivery system. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR). (July2012)2( 4)
28
29. 6)Prasanth v.v., Chakraborthy Moy A, Sam T Mathew, Mathapan R. Microspheres - An
Overview. Inter J Res Pharm Biomedical Sci.2012,89-96.
7)Sigimol J, Jacob E, Mathew M, Sharon Anna Babu, SS. Anju. Formulation and
evaluation of Diclofenac sodium loaded albumin microsphere. Inter J Res Pharm N
Scie. 2014, 3(1), 6 - 11.
8)Alagusundaram.M, Chetty.C, Umashankari.K, Lavanya.C, Ramkanth.S. Microsphere
as a Novel drug delivery system- a Review. Inter J Chem Tech Res CODEN (USA):
IJCRGG. 1, No.3, ppJuly-Sept 2009 526-534,.
9)Deshmukh V, Warad S, Solunke R, Walunj S, Palve S, Jagdale G. Microspheres: As
new drug delivery system. W. J. Pharm. Pharma. Scie.:2013, 2(6),.
10) Nikam V. K.,. Gudsoorkar V.R,. Hiremath S.N, Dolas R.T.,. Kashid V.A.
Microspheres - A Novel Drug Delivery System: An Overview. Inter. J. of Pharma.
Che Scie.; Jan – Mar 2012,Vol. 1 (1).
11)Patel N. R., Patel D. A., Bharadia P. D., Pandya V.. Microsphere as a novel drug
delivery. Inter. J. Pharm. L. scie.; Aug., 2011.56-78.
29
30. 12) Soni M L, Kumar M Namdeo, K P. Sodium alginate microspheres for extending
drug release: formulation and in vitro evaluation. Inter.J. D.D. 2 (2010) 64-68.
13) Yadav V., Varshney H. M.. Microsphere: A Review. J. D. D. Therapeutics 1 (7)
2013, 23-33.
14) Pachuau L, Sarkar S, Mazumder B. Formulation and evaluation of matrix
microspheres for simultaneous delivery of salbutamol sulphate and theophylline.
Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, June 2008; 7 (2): 995-1002.
15) Kyekyoon “Kevin” Kim, Daniel W. Pack. Microspheres for Drug Delivery.
16) Chandra D., Chaurasia S.,. Singh V.K, Yadav K. K.. Chitosan based Mucoadhesive
Microsphere: Versatile Carrier for nasal drug delivery system. W. J. Pharm. Res. ;3(
6), 2014.
17) Remington (2000). The Science and Practice of Phrmacy. 21st edition, volume 2,
Edited by Alfanso R Gennaro, Published by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Philadelphia; p 316.
30
31. 18)Jain N.K.. Controlled and Novel Drug Delivery. CBS Publication. p 236.
19) Vyas S.P.., R.K.Khar, International Journal for Targeted & Controlled Drug
Delivery Novel Carrier Systems.,First Edition :2002.,Reprint :2007 page
no:417,453.
20) www.wikipedia.org
31