Use of Forensics to Identify
Sources of Methane
Presented by: Court Sandau, PhD, PChem
November 15, 2007
Air and Waste Management Association’s
Vapour Intrusion – A Rapidly Developing Environmental Challenge
1
© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Environmental Forensic Investigation
“The application of scientific methods used to
identify the origin and timing of a contaminant
release”
www.chemistry-matters.com
2© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
When to use Environmental Forensics
• When contamination may not
be yours (remove liability)
• When contamination is from
multiple sources (share
liability)
www.chemistry-matters.com
3© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Implicate or Vindicate?
• It may demonstrate your own
responsibility
• It may show dual responsibility
(share the liability)
• It may vindicate a party
completely
www.chemistry-matters.com
4© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Issues of Concern
The client (municipality) has identified fugitive
methane gas in the subsurface soils of several
different areas of the city
• Unknown source
• Concerned residents
• Possible health risks
• Potential legal action
www.chemistry-matters.com
5© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Health Region Guidelines
Subsurface Action Levels
• Further investigation
• Evaluation of indoor levels
• Source removal or ventilation system
• Further investigation
• Monitoring, ventilation recommended
• Immediate building evacuation, call 911
• Further investigation
• Alarm, ventilation system, evacuation
plan for nearby buildings
50,000
(100% LEL)
Indoor Methane
Concentration
(ppm)
5,000
1,000
0
www.chemistry-matters.com
6© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Forensic Geo-Gas Investigation (FGI)
• Collect gas samples
from various origins
• Characterize each
source and create a
reference library
• Establish the
composition and
source of the fugitive
gases through
comparisons with the
reference library
www.chemistry-matters.com
7© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Forensic Geo-gas Investigation
Multidisciplinary Approach to develop lines of
evidence
Measurement and interpretation of
physical and chemical sampling data
Historical documents
Witness and knowledgeable individuals Area of highest
confidence
www.chemistry-matters.com
8© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Witness and Knowledgeable
Individuals
• Interview
knowledgeable people
regarding
circumstances
surrounding events
and non-events
www.chemistry-matters.com
9© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Historical Documents
www.chemistry-matters.com
10© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Measurement and Interpretation
Retention Time
RelativeResponse
S
S
www.chemistry-matters.com
11© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Case History
Pre 1940’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s
1953:
nuisance ground
operation began
1963:
nuisance ground
operation closed
2001-2005:
Phase I&II Site
Investigations
indicate elevated
CH4 Levels
Borrow
Pit/
Natural
Vegetation
www.chemistry-matters.com
12© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Investigation
• Sampling location chosen based on historical data
• 1L gas samples taken from 4 sample locations
• Tiered Forensic Approach adopted to identify
potential sources
www.chemistry-matters.com
13© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Tiered Forensic Approach
Calorific Value (BTU Ft3
)
Hydrocarbon Content
Volatile Organic Carbon Content
Level1
Fixed Gas
Radio Active Isotope (14
C)
Stable Isotope Analysis of CH4
Level2
www.chemistry-matters.com
14© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
QA-QC
• Duplicate sample collected at reference library
sampling point
• Relative Percent Differences <20% indicates good
precision
• Lab reported accuracy to within 2% of reference
standards
www.chemistry-matters.com
15© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: Fixed Gas
Results
Methane and Fixed Gas Data Library
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
H
istoric
Landfill
Landfill
Landfill
Sew
age
Sew
age
N
aturalG
as
N
aturalG
as
U
nknow
n
#1
U
nknow
n
#2
Sampling Location
Volume(%)
O2 %
CO2 %
N2 %
CH4%
www.chemistry-matters.com
16© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15
Alkane
s
Concentrationmg/m3
Natural Gas
www.chemistry-matters.com
17© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15
Alkanes
Concentrationmg/m3
Landfill
www.chemistry-matters.com
18© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15
Alkanes
Concentrationmg/m3
Sewage
www.chemistry-matters.com
19© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15
Alkanes
Concentrationmg/m3
Unknown #1
www.chemistry-matters.com
20© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15
Alkanes
Concentrationmg/m3
Unknown #2
www.chemistry-matters.com
21© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: Hydrocarbon Fingerprinting
Results
www.chemistry-matters.com
22© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: VOC Fingerprinting
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Volatile Organic Compounds
Concentrationmg/m3
Natural Gas: Alkanes
and Alkenes
www.chemistry-matters.com
23© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: VOC Fingerprinting
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Volatile Organic Compounds
Concentrationmg/m3
Sewage: Sulfide
Compounds
www.chemistry-matters.com
24© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: VOC Fingerprinting
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Volatile Organic Compounds
Concentrationmg/m3
Landfill: Chlorinated
Compounds
www.chemistry-matters.com
25© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: VOC Fingerprinting
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Volatile Organic Compounds
Concentrationmg/m3
Unknown #1
www.chemistry-matters.com
26© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Level 1: VOC Fingerprinting
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Volatile Organic Compounds
Concentrationmg/m3
Unknown #2
www.chemistry-matters.com
27© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Summary of Level 1 Findings
• 2 locations had elevated levels of CH4
• Based on calorific and fixed gas data
Thermogenic sources were ruled out
• Unable to differentiate landfill, sewage sources
using level 1 investigation
• Need to progress to Level 2
www.chemistry-matters.com
28© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Radio Carbon Isotope Dating 14
C
•Naturally occurring isotope with a half life of
5730 yrs
•The ratio of 14
C contained within CH4 is indicative
of age
50%
Age 5730 yr
100%
Age 0
…
….
25%
Age 11,460 yr
Natural Gas Landfill Sewage Unknown
14
C (pMc) 0 >100 100-110 141
www.chemistry-matters.com
29© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Stable Isotope Analysis
• Highly variable in nature and generally endemic of every
organic compound
• Have been used with petroleum exploration for many
decades, advance is isotope techniques has led to new
areas of applications e.g. archaeology, biomedical
sciences, biosynthesis and environmental forensics
pp
ee--
Hydrogen,1
H
nn
pp
ee--
Deuterium,Deuterium,22
H, DH, D
nn
pp nn
ee--
Tritium,Tritium,33
H, TH, T
99
%
~1
%
<1
%
www.chemistry-matters.com
30© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Clarke Diagram for 2D Fingerprinting
δ13
C-CH4(‰)
Bacterial MF
δ2
H-CH4 (‰)
Bacterial
Carbonate
Reduction
Bacterial
M
ixand
Transition
Early Mature
Thermogenic
migration
Bacterial Oxidation
www.chemistry-matters.com
31© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Combination of Techniques
δ13
C-CH4 (‰)
C1/[C2+C3]
Sewage
Plant
Sewage
Plant
Unknown
Unknown
Landfill
Landfill
Historic
Landfill
Natural Gas
Natural Gas
Bacterial consumption of Methane will cause a
reduction in Methane concentration and
isotopic shift
Migration will cause a change in methane
concentration but not a large isotopic shift
Migration
Migration
Oxidation
www.chemistry-matters.com
32© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Summary
Source
Calorifi
c Value
(BTU/Ft
3
)
CH4
/CO
2
GC Carbon
Analysis
VOC
14
C –
pMC
δ13
C and δ2
H of CH4
Thermogenic ~ 1000 + CH4
Low C1
/C1
– C5 Odorants 0 pMC
δ13
C = -48‰ to -40‰
δ2
H = -250‰ to -200‰
Landfill ~600
CO2
=
CH4
High C1
/C1
– C5
chlorinated
compounds
>100
pMC
δ13
C = -60‰ to -52‰
δ2
H = -400‰ to
-350‰
Sewage ~600
CO2
=
CH4
High C1
/C1
– C5
Sulphur
containing
100
-110
pMC
δ13
C = -52‰ to -48‰
δ2
H = -425‰ to
-375‰
Unknown1 ~447
CO2
<
CH4
High C1
/C1
– C5 ND
141
pMC
δ13
C = -54.5‰
δ2
H = -346‰
Unknown2 ~26
CO2
=
CH4
High C1
/C1
– C5 ND
101
pMC
δ13
C = -51.5‰
δ2
H = -341‰
Level 1 Level 2
www.chemistry-matters.com
33© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Summary
Source
Calorifi
c Value
(BTU/Ft
3
)
CH4
/CO
2
GC Carbon
Analysis
VOC
14
C –
pMC
δ13
C and δ2
H of CH4
Thermogenic ~ 1000 + CH4
Low C1
/C1
– C5 Odorants 0 pMC
δ13
C = -48‰ to -40‰
δ2
H = -250‰ to -200‰
Landfill ~600
CO2
=
CH4
High C1
/C1
– C5
chlorinated
compounds
>100
pMC
δ13
C = -60‰ to -52‰
δ2
H = -400‰ to
-350‰
Sewage ~600
CO2
=
CH4
High C1
/C1
– C5
Sulphur
containing
100
-110
pMC
δ13
C = -52‰ to -48‰
δ2
H = -425‰ to
-375‰
Unknown1 ~447
CO2
<
CH4
High C1
/C1
– C5 ND
141
pMC
δ13
C = -54.5‰
δ2
H = -346‰
Unknown2 ~26
CO2
=
CH4
High C1
/C1
– C5 ND
101
pMC
δ13
C = -51.5‰
δ2
H = -341‰
Level 1 Level 2
Potentially a mixed source
www.chemistry-matters.com
34© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Conclusion
• Main Issue for client was identification of potential sources of
fugitive methane emissions
• Outcomes
– Generation of Library
– Use of historical data and Level 1 analysis eliminated
thermogenic sources
– Level 2 data indicate degradation of landfill material may be
responsible for methane found at sampling point with highest
concentration
– Second sampling point likely to be of a mixed source with landfill
and organic soils contributing
• Further monitoring may determine the fate and behavior of
elevated methane which will help clients to make decision
regarding any action needed
www.chemistry-matters.com
35© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Contact Info:
Chemistry Matters Inc.
Court Sandau
Cell: 1.403.669.8566
Email: csandau@chemistry-matters.com
URL: chemistry-matters.com
Twitter: @Chem_Matters
Slideshare: www.slideshare.net/csandau
© 2015
Chemistry Matters Inc.

Methane forensics techniques for source allocation

  • 1.
    Use of Forensicsto Identify Sources of Methane Presented by: Court Sandau, PhD, PChem November 15, 2007 Air and Waste Management Association’s Vapour Intrusion – A Rapidly Developing Environmental Challenge 1 © 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 2.
    Environmental Forensic Investigation “Theapplication of scientific methods used to identify the origin and timing of a contaminant release” www.chemistry-matters.com 2© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 3.
    When to useEnvironmental Forensics • When contamination may not be yours (remove liability) • When contamination is from multiple sources (share liability) www.chemistry-matters.com 3© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 4.
    Implicate or Vindicate? •It may demonstrate your own responsibility • It may show dual responsibility (share the liability) • It may vindicate a party completely www.chemistry-matters.com 4© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 5.
    Issues of Concern Theclient (municipality) has identified fugitive methane gas in the subsurface soils of several different areas of the city • Unknown source • Concerned residents • Possible health risks • Potential legal action www.chemistry-matters.com 5© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 6.
    Health Region Guidelines SubsurfaceAction Levels • Further investigation • Evaluation of indoor levels • Source removal or ventilation system • Further investigation • Monitoring, ventilation recommended • Immediate building evacuation, call 911 • Further investigation • Alarm, ventilation system, evacuation plan for nearby buildings 50,000 (100% LEL) Indoor Methane Concentration (ppm) 5,000 1,000 0 www.chemistry-matters.com 6© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 7.
    Forensic Geo-Gas Investigation(FGI) • Collect gas samples from various origins • Characterize each source and create a reference library • Establish the composition and source of the fugitive gases through comparisons with the reference library www.chemistry-matters.com 7© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 8.
    Forensic Geo-gas Investigation MultidisciplinaryApproach to develop lines of evidence Measurement and interpretation of physical and chemical sampling data Historical documents Witness and knowledgeable individuals Area of highest confidence www.chemistry-matters.com 8© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 9.
    Witness and Knowledgeable Individuals •Interview knowledgeable people regarding circumstances surrounding events and non-events www.chemistry-matters.com 9© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Measurement and Interpretation RetentionTime RelativeResponse S S www.chemistry-matters.com 11© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 12.
    Case History Pre 1940’s1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 1953: nuisance ground operation began 1963: nuisance ground operation closed 2001-2005: Phase I&II Site Investigations indicate elevated CH4 Levels Borrow Pit/ Natural Vegetation www.chemistry-matters.com 12© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 13.
    Investigation • Sampling locationchosen based on historical data • 1L gas samples taken from 4 sample locations • Tiered Forensic Approach adopted to identify potential sources www.chemistry-matters.com 13© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 14.
    Tiered Forensic Approach CalorificValue (BTU Ft3 ) Hydrocarbon Content Volatile Organic Carbon Content Level1 Fixed Gas Radio Active Isotope (14 C) Stable Isotope Analysis of CH4 Level2 www.chemistry-matters.com 14© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 15.
    QA-QC • Duplicate samplecollected at reference library sampling point • Relative Percent Differences <20% indicates good precision • Lab reported accuracy to within 2% of reference standards www.chemistry-matters.com 15© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 16.
    Level 1: FixedGas Results Methane and Fixed Gas Data Library 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 H istoric Landfill Landfill Landfill Sew age Sew age N aturalG as N aturalG as U nknow n #1 U nknow n #2 Sampling Location Volume(%) O2 % CO2 % N2 % CH4% www.chemistry-matters.com 16© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 17.
    Level 1: HydrocarbonFingerprinting Results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 Alkane s Concentrationmg/m3 Natural Gas www.chemistry-matters.com 17© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 18.
    Level 1: HydrocarbonFingerprinting Results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 Alkanes Concentrationmg/m3 Landfill www.chemistry-matters.com 18© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 19.
    Level 1: HydrocarbonFingerprinting Results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 Alkanes Concentrationmg/m3 Sewage www.chemistry-matters.com 19© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 20.
    Level 1: HydrocarbonFingerprinting Results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 Alkanes Concentrationmg/m3 Unknown #1 www.chemistry-matters.com 20© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 21.
    Level 1: HydrocarbonFingerprinting Results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 Alkanes Concentrationmg/m3 Unknown #2 www.chemistry-matters.com 21© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 22.
    Level 1: HydrocarbonFingerprinting Results www.chemistry-matters.com 22© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 23.
    Level 1: VOCFingerprinting Results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Volatile Organic Compounds Concentrationmg/m3 Natural Gas: Alkanes and Alkenes www.chemistry-matters.com 23© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 24.
    Level 1: VOCFingerprinting Results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Volatile Organic Compounds Concentrationmg/m3 Sewage: Sulfide Compounds www.chemistry-matters.com 24© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 25.
    Level 1: VOCFingerprinting Results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Volatile Organic Compounds Concentrationmg/m3 Landfill: Chlorinated Compounds www.chemistry-matters.com 25© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 26.
    Level 1: VOCFingerprinting Results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Volatile Organic Compounds Concentrationmg/m3 Unknown #1 www.chemistry-matters.com 26© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 27.
    Level 1: VOCFingerprinting Results 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Volatile Organic Compounds Concentrationmg/m3 Unknown #2 www.chemistry-matters.com 27© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 28.
    Summary of Level1 Findings • 2 locations had elevated levels of CH4 • Based on calorific and fixed gas data Thermogenic sources were ruled out • Unable to differentiate landfill, sewage sources using level 1 investigation • Need to progress to Level 2 www.chemistry-matters.com 28© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 29.
    Radio Carbon IsotopeDating 14 C •Naturally occurring isotope with a half life of 5730 yrs •The ratio of 14 C contained within CH4 is indicative of age 50% Age 5730 yr 100% Age 0 … …. 25% Age 11,460 yr Natural Gas Landfill Sewage Unknown 14 C (pMc) 0 >100 100-110 141 www.chemistry-matters.com 29© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 30.
    Stable Isotope Analysis •Highly variable in nature and generally endemic of every organic compound • Have been used with petroleum exploration for many decades, advance is isotope techniques has led to new areas of applications e.g. archaeology, biomedical sciences, biosynthesis and environmental forensics pp ee-- Hydrogen,1 H nn pp ee-- Deuterium,Deuterium,22 H, DH, D nn pp nn ee-- Tritium,Tritium,33 H, TH, T 99 % ~1 % <1 % www.chemistry-matters.com 30© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 31.
    Clarke Diagram for2D Fingerprinting δ13 C-CH4(‰) Bacterial MF δ2 H-CH4 (‰) Bacterial Carbonate Reduction Bacterial M ixand Transition Early Mature Thermogenic migration Bacterial Oxidation www.chemistry-matters.com 31© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 32.
    Combination of Techniques δ13 C-CH4(‰) C1/[C2+C3] Sewage Plant Sewage Plant Unknown Unknown Landfill Landfill Historic Landfill Natural Gas Natural Gas Bacterial consumption of Methane will cause a reduction in Methane concentration and isotopic shift Migration will cause a change in methane concentration but not a large isotopic shift Migration Migration Oxidation www.chemistry-matters.com 32© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 33.
    Summary Source Calorifi c Value (BTU/Ft 3 ) CH4 /CO 2 GC Carbon Analysis VOC 14 C– pMC δ13 C and δ2 H of CH4 Thermogenic ~ 1000 + CH4 Low C1 /C1 – C5 Odorants 0 pMC δ13 C = -48‰ to -40‰ δ2 H = -250‰ to -200‰ Landfill ~600 CO2 = CH4 High C1 /C1 – C5 chlorinated compounds >100 pMC δ13 C = -60‰ to -52‰ δ2 H = -400‰ to -350‰ Sewage ~600 CO2 = CH4 High C1 /C1 – C5 Sulphur containing 100 -110 pMC δ13 C = -52‰ to -48‰ δ2 H = -425‰ to -375‰ Unknown1 ~447 CO2 < CH4 High C1 /C1 – C5 ND 141 pMC δ13 C = -54.5‰ δ2 H = -346‰ Unknown2 ~26 CO2 = CH4 High C1 /C1 – C5 ND 101 pMC δ13 C = -51.5‰ δ2 H = -341‰ Level 1 Level 2 www.chemistry-matters.com 33© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 34.
    Summary Source Calorifi c Value (BTU/Ft 3 ) CH4 /CO 2 GC Carbon Analysis VOC 14 C– pMC δ13 C and δ2 H of CH4 Thermogenic ~ 1000 + CH4 Low C1 /C1 – C5 Odorants 0 pMC δ13 C = -48‰ to -40‰ δ2 H = -250‰ to -200‰ Landfill ~600 CO2 = CH4 High C1 /C1 – C5 chlorinated compounds >100 pMC δ13 C = -60‰ to -52‰ δ2 H = -400‰ to -350‰ Sewage ~600 CO2 = CH4 High C1 /C1 – C5 Sulphur containing 100 -110 pMC δ13 C = -52‰ to -48‰ δ2 H = -425‰ to -375‰ Unknown1 ~447 CO2 < CH4 High C1 /C1 – C5 ND 141 pMC δ13 C = -54.5‰ δ2 H = -346‰ Unknown2 ~26 CO2 = CH4 High C1 /C1 – C5 ND 101 pMC δ13 C = -51.5‰ δ2 H = -341‰ Level 1 Level 2 Potentially a mixed source www.chemistry-matters.com 34© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 35.
    Conclusion • Main Issuefor client was identification of potential sources of fugitive methane emissions • Outcomes – Generation of Library – Use of historical data and Level 1 analysis eliminated thermogenic sources – Level 2 data indicate degradation of landfill material may be responsible for methane found at sampling point with highest concentration – Second sampling point likely to be of a mixed source with landfill and organic soils contributing • Further monitoring may determine the fate and behavior of elevated methane which will help clients to make decision regarding any action needed www.chemistry-matters.com 35© 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.
  • 36.
    Contact Info: Chemistry MattersInc. Court Sandau Cell: 1.403.669.8566 Email: csandau@chemistry-matters.com URL: chemistry-matters.com Twitter: @Chem_Matters Slideshare: www.slideshare.net/csandau © 2015 Chemistry Matters Inc.