Section 5.3
          Evaluating Definite Integrals

                  V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I

                           New York University


                            June 21, 2010



Announcements

   Final Exam is Thursday in class
Announcements



           Sections 5.3–5.4 today
           Section 5.5 tomorrow
           Review and Movie Day
           Wednesday
           Final exam Thursday
                   roughly half-and-half
                   MC/FR
                   FR is all post-midterm
                   MC might have some
                   pre-midterm stuff on it




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   2 / 44
Resurrection Policy
 If your final score beats your midterm score, we will add 10% to its weight,
 and subtract 10% from the midterm weight.




Image credit: Scott Beale / Laughing Squid
V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)      Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   3 / 44
Objectives




           Use the Evaluation Theorem
           to evaluate definite integrals.
           Write antiderivatives as
           indefinite integrals.
           Interpret definite integrals as
           “net change” of a function
           over an interval.




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   4 / 44
Outline

 Last time: The Definite Integral
    The definite integral as a limit
    Properties of the integral
    Comparison Properties of the Integral

 Evaluating Definite Integrals
    Examples

 The Integral as Total Change

 Indefinite Integrals
    My first table of integrals

 Computing Area with integrals


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   5 / 44
The definite integral as a limit

 Definition
 If f is a function defined on [a, b], the definite integral of f from a to b
 is the number
                                        b                               n
                                            f (x) dx = lim                  f (ci ) ∆x
                                    a                        n→∞
                                                                      i=1

                      b−a
 where ∆x =               , and for each i, xi = a + i∆x, and ci is a point in
                       n
 [xi−1 , xi ].

 Theorem
 If f is continuous on [a, b] or if f has only finitely many jump
 discontinuities, then f is integrable on [a, b]; that is, the definite integral
       b
           f (x) dx exists and is the same for any choice of ci .
   a


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)       Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals     June 21, 2010   6 / 44
Notation/Terminology



                                                         b
                                                             f (x) dx
                                                     a


              — integral sign (swoopy S)
         f (x) — integrand
         a and b — limits of integration (a is the lower limit and b the
         upper limit)
         dx — ??? (a parenthesis? an infinitesimal? a variable?)
         The process of computing an integral is called integration




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   7 / 44
Example
                      1
                            4
 Estimate                        dx using the midpoint rule and four divisions.
                  0       1 + x2




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   8 / 44
Example
                      1
                            4
 Estimate                        dx using the midpoint rule and four divisions.
                  0       1 + x2

 Solution
 Dividing up [0, 1] into 4 pieces gives

                                        1      2      3       4
                            x0 = 0, x1 = , x2 = , x3 = , x4 =
                                        4      4      4       4
 So the midpoint rule gives

                   1            4            4            4            4
         M4 =                       2
                                      +          2
                                                   +          2
                                                                +
                   4       1 + (1/8)    1 + (3/8)    1 + (5/8)    1 + (7/8)2




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   8 / 44
Example
                      1
                            4
 Estimate                        dx using the midpoint rule and four divisions.
                  0       1 + x2

 Solution
 Dividing up [0, 1] into 4 pieces gives

                                        1      2      3       4
                            x0 = 0, x1 = , x2 = , x3 = , x4 =
                                        4      4      4       4
 So the midpoint rule gives

                1               4            4            4            4
         M4 =                       2
                                      +          2
                                                   +          2
                                                                +
                4          1 + (1/8)    1 + (3/8)    1 + (5/8)    1 + (7/8)2
                1            4        4        4        4
              =                   +       +        +
                4          65/64 73/64 89/64 113/64




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   8 / 44
Example
                      1
                            4
 Estimate                        dx using the midpoint rule and four divisions.
                  0       1 + x2

 Solution
 Dividing up [0, 1] into 4 pieces gives

                                        1      2      3       4
                            x0 = 0, x1 = , x2 = , x3 = , x4 =
                                        4      4      4       4
 So the midpoint rule gives

                1        4             4            4            4
         M4 =                 2
                                +          2
                                             +          2
                                                          +
                4 1 + (1/8)       1 + (3/8)    1 + (5/8)    1 + (7/8)2
                1     4         4        4        4
              =            +        +        +
                4 65/64 73/64 89/64 113/64
                150, 166, 784
              =               ≈ 3.1468
                47, 720, 465

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   8 / 44
Properties of the integral


 Theorem (Additive Properties of the Integral)
 Let f and g be integrable functions on [a, b] and c a constant. Then
               b
    1.             c dx = c(b − a)
           a
               b                                           b                       b
    2.             [f (x) + g (x)] dx =                        f (x) dx +              g (x) dx.
           a                                           a                       a
               b                            b
    3.             cf (x) dx = c                f (x) dx.
           a                            a
               b                                           b                       b
    4.             [f (x) − g (x)] dx =                        f (x) dx −              g (x) dx.
           a                                           a                       a




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)           Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals           June 21, 2010   9 / 44
More Properties of the Integral



 Conventions:
                                              a                               b
                                                  f (x) dx = −                    f (x) dx
                                          b                               a
                                                         a
                                                             f (x) dx = 0
                                                     a
 This allows us to have
               c                     b                            c
    5.             f (x) dx =            f (x) dx +                   f (x) dx for all a, b, and c.
           a                     a                            b




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)      Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals           June 21, 2010   10 / 44
Definite Integrals We Know So Far


          If the integral computes an
          area and we know the area,
          we can use that. For
                                                                                   y
          instance,
                         1
                                                  π
                             1 − x 2 dx =
                     0                            2

          By brute force we computed                                                         x
                1                           1
                               1                           1
                    x 2 dx =                    x 3 dx =
            0                  3        0                  4




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)       Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   11 / 44
Comparison Properties of the Integral
 Theorem
 Let f and g be integrable functions on [a, b].
    6. If f (x) ≥ 0 for all x in [a, b], then
                                                         b
                                                             f (x) dx ≥ 0
                                                     a




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   12 / 44
Integral of a nonnegative function is nonnegative

 Proof.
 If f (x) ≥ 0 for all x in [a, b], then for any number of divisions n and choice
 of sample points {ci }:
                                            n                       n
                               Sn =              f (ci ) ∆x ≥           0 · ∆x = 0
                                        i=1       ≥0              i=1


 Since Sn ≥ 0 for all n, the limit of {Sn } is nonnegative, too:
                                            b
                                                f (x) dx = lim Sn ≥ 0
                                        a                   n→∞
                                                                        ≥0




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals     June 21, 2010   13 / 44
Comparison Properties of the Integral
 Theorem
 Let f and g be integrable functions on [a, b].
    6. If f (x) ≥ 0 for all x in [a, b], then
                                                          b
                                                              f (x) dx ≥ 0
                                                      a


    7. If f (x) ≥ g (x) for all x in [a, b], then
                                                b                       b
                                                    f (x) dx ≥              g (x) dx
                                            a                       a




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals       June 21, 2010   14 / 44
The definite integral is “increasing”

 Proof.
 Let h(x) = f (x) − g (x). If f (x) ≥ g (x) for all x in [a, b], then h(x) ≥ 0
 for all x in [a, b]. So by the previous property
                                                        b
                                                            h(x) dx ≥ 0
                                                    a

 This means that
            b                     b                             b                              b
                f (x) dx −            g (x) dx =                    (f (x) − g (x)) dx =           h(x) dx ≥ 0
        a                     a                             a                              a

 So
                                              b                             b
                                                  f (x) dx ≥                    g (x) dx
                                          a                             a



V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)    Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals                  June 21, 2010   15 / 44
Comparison Properties of the Integral
 Theorem
 Let f and g be integrable functions on [a, b].
   6. If f (x) ≥ 0 for all x in [a, b], then
                                                              b
                                                                  f (x) dx ≥ 0
                                                          a


   7. If f (x) ≥ g (x) for all x in [a, b], then
                                                    b                         b
                                                        f (x) dx ≥                g (x) dx
                                                a                         a


   8. If m ≤ f (x) ≤ M for all x in [a, b], then
                                                                  b
                                        m(b − a) ≤                    f (x) dx ≤ M(b − a)
                                                              a



V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)     Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals           June 21, 2010   16 / 44
Bounding the integral using bounds of the function


 Proof.
 If m ≤ f (x) ≤ M on for all x in [a, b], then by the previous property
                                     b                    b                       b
                                         m dx ≤               f (x) dx ≤              M dx
                                 a                    a                       a

 By Property 1, the integral of a constant function is the product of the
 constant and the width of the interval. So:
                                                          b
                               m(b − a) ≤                     f (x) dx ≤ M(b − a)
                                                      a




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)     Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals           June 21, 2010   17 / 44
Estimating an integral with inequalities

 Example
                      2
                          1
 Estimate                   dx using Property 8.
                  1       x




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   18 / 44
Estimating an integral with inequalities

 Example
                      2
                          1
 Estimate                   dx using Property 8.
                  1       x

 Solution
 Since
                                                                  1  1  1
                                        1 ≤ x ≤ 2 =⇒                ≤ ≤
                                                                  2  x  1
 we have
                                                            2
                                1                               1
                                  · (2 − 1) ≤                     dx ≤ 1 · (2 − 1)
                                2                       1       x
 or
                                                            2
                                              1                 1
                                                ≤                 dx ≤ 1
                                              2         1       x


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)    Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals    June 21, 2010   18 / 44
Outline

 Last time: The Definite Integral
    The definite integral as a limit
    Properties of the integral
    Comparison Properties of the Integral

 Evaluating Definite Integrals
    Examples

 The Integral as Total Change

 Indefinite Integrals
    My first table of integrals

 Computing Area with integrals


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   19 / 44
Socratic proof



          The definite integral of
          velocity measures
          displacement (net distance)
          The derivative of
          displacement is velocity
          So we can compute
          displacement with the
          definite integral or the
          antiderivative of velocity
          But any function can be a
          velocity function, so . . .



V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   20 / 44
Theorem of the Day



 Theorem (The Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus)
 Suppose f is integrable on [a, b] and f = F for another function F , then
                                            b
                                                f (x) dx = F (b) − F (a).
                                        a




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   21 / 44
Theorem of the Day



 Theorem (The Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus)
 Suppose f is integrable on [a, b] and f = F for another function F , then
                                            b
                                                f (x) dx = F (b) − F (a).
                                        a



 Note
 In Section 5.3, this theorem is called “The Evaluation Theorem”. Nobody
 else in the world calls it that.




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   21 / 44
Proving the Second FTC



                                                        b−a
 Divide up [a, b] into n pieces of equal width ∆x =           as usual. For
                                                          n
 each i, F is continuous on [xi−1 , xi ] and differentiable on (xi−1 , xi ). So
 there is a point ci in (xi−1 , xi ) with

                                 F (xi ) − F (xi−1 )
                                                     = F (ci ) = f (ci )
                                     xi − xi−1

 Or
                                        f (ci )∆x = F (xi ) − F (xi−1 )




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)    Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   22 / 44
Proof continued

 We have for each i
                                        f (ci )∆x = F (xi ) − F (xi−1 )
 Form the Riemann Sum:
                   n                       n
        Sn =           f (ci )∆x =              (F (xi ) − F (xi−1 ))
                 i=1                      i=1


             = (F (x1 ) − F (x0 )) + (F (x2 ) − F (x1 )) + (F (x3 ) − F (x2 )) + · · ·
                    · · · + (F (xn−1 ) − F (xn−2 )) + (F (xn ) − F (xn−1 ))
             = F (xn ) − F (x0 ) = F (b) − F (a)




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)    Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   23 / 44
Proof continued

 We have for each i
                                        f (ci )∆x = F (xi ) − F (xi−1 )
 Form the Riemann Sum:
                   n                       n
        Sn =           f (ci )∆x =              (F (xi ) − F (xi−1 ))
                 i=1                      i=1


             = (F (x1 ) − F (x0 )) + (F (x2 ) − F (x1 )) + (F (x3 ) − F (x2 )) + · · ·
                    · · · + (F (xn−1 ) − F (xn−2 )) + (F (xn ) − F (xn−1 ))
             = F (xn ) − F (x0 ) = F (b) − F (a)

 See if you can spot the invocation of the Mean Value Theorem!


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)    Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   23 / 44
Proof Completed



 We have shown for each n,

                                            Sn = F (b) − F (a)

 so in the limit
                  b
                      f (x) dx = lim Sn = lim (F (b) − F (a)) = F (b) − F (a)
              a                    n→∞             n→∞




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   24 / 44
Computing area with the Second FTC


 Example
 Find the area between y = x 3 and the x-axis, between x = 0 and x = 1.




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   25 / 44
Computing area with the Second FTC


 Example
 Find the area between y = x 3 and the x-axis, between x = 0 and x = 1.

  Solution


                    1                   1
                                   x4           1
       A=               x 3 dx =            =
                0                  4    0       4




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   25 / 44
Computing area with the Second FTC


 Example
 Find the area between y = x 3 and the x-axis, between x = 0 and x = 1.

  Solution


                    1                   1
                                   x4           1
       A=               x 3 dx =            =
                0                  4    0       4

 Here we use the notation F (x)|b or [F (x)]b to mean F (b) − F (a).
                                a           a




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   25 / 44
Computing area with the Second FTC
 Example
 Find the area enclosed by the parabola y = x 2 and y = 1.




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   26 / 44
Computing area with the Second FTC
 Example
 Find the area enclosed by the parabola y = x 2 and y = 1.



                                                        1




                                        −1                                      1




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)    Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   26 / 44
Computing area with the Second FTC
 Example
 Find the area enclosed by the parabola y = x 2 and y = 1.



                                                        1




                                        −1                                      1

 Solution

                              1                               1
                                                        x3                          1     1            4
             A=2−                 x 2 dx = 2 −                      =2−               − −         =
                            −1                          3     −1                    3     3            3

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)    Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals             June 21, 2010   26 / 44
Computing an integral we estimated before

 Example
                                            1
                                                  4
 Evaluate the integral                                 dx.
                                        0       1 + x2




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)           Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   27 / 44
Example
                      1
                            4
 Estimate                        dx using the midpoint rule and four divisions.
                  0       1 + x2

 Solution
 Dividing up [0, 1] into 4 pieces gives

                                        1      2      3       4
                            x0 = 0, x1 = , x2 = , x3 = , x4 =
                                        4      4      4       4
 So the midpoint rule gives

                1        4             4            4            4
         M4 =                 2
                                +          2
                                             +          2
                                                          +
                4 1 + (1/8)       1 + (3/8)    1 + (5/8)    1 + (7/8)2
                1     4         4        4        4
              =            +        +        +
                4 65/64 73/64 89/64 113/64
                150, 166, 784
              =               ≈ 3.1468
                47, 720, 465

V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   28 / 44
Computing an integral we estimated before

 Example
                                            1
                                                  4
 Evaluate the integral                                 dx.
                                        0       1 + x2

 Solution


                                   1                                    1
                                         4                                    1
                                              dx = 4                               dx
                               0       1 + x2                       0       1 + x2




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)           Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   29 / 44
Computing an integral we estimated before

 Example
                                            1
                                                  4
 Evaluate the integral                                 dx.
                                        0       1 + x2

 Solution


                                   1                                    1
                                         4                                    1
                                              dx = 4                               dx
                               0       1 + x2                       0       1 + x2
                                                           = 4 arctan(x)|1
                                                                         0




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)           Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   29 / 44
Computing an integral we estimated before

 Example
                                            1
                                                  4
 Evaluate the integral                                 dx.
                                        0       1 + x2

 Solution


                                   1                                    1
                                         4                                    1
                                              dx = 4                               dx
                               0       1 + x2                       0       1 + x2
                                                           = 4 arctan(x)|1
                                                                         0
                                                           = 4 (arctan 1 − arctan 0)




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)           Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   29 / 44
Computing an integral we estimated before

 Example
                                            1
                                                  4
 Evaluate the integral                                 dx.
                                        0       1 + x2

 Solution


                                   1                                    1
                                         4                                    1
                                              dx = 4                               dx
                               0       1 + x2                       0       1 + x2
                                                           = 4 arctan(x)|1
                                                                         0
                                                           = 4 (arctan 1 − arctan 0)
                                                                 π
                                                           =4      −0
                                                                 4


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)           Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   29 / 44
Computing an integral we estimated before

 Example
                                            1
                                                  4
 Evaluate the integral                                 dx.
                                        0       1 + x2

 Solution


                                   1                                    1
                                         4                                    1
                                              dx = 4                               dx
                               0       1 + x2                       0       1 + x2
                                                           = 4 arctan(x)|1
                                                                         0
                                                           = 4 (arctan 1 − arctan 0)
                                                                 π
                                                           =4      −0 =π
                                                                 4


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)           Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   29 / 44
Computing an integral we estimated before


 Example
                      2
                          1
 Evaluate                   dx.
                  1       x




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   30 / 44
Estimating an integral with inequalities

 Example
                      2
                          1
 Estimate                   dx using Property 8.
                  1       x

 Solution
 Since
                                                                  1  1  1
                                        1 ≤ x ≤ 2 =⇒                ≤ ≤
                                                                  2  x  1
 we have
                                                            2
                                1                               1
                                  · (2 − 1) ≤                     dx ≤ 1 · (2 − 1)
                                2                       1       x
 or
                                                            2
                                              1                 1
                                                ≤                 dx ≤ 1
                                              2         1       x


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)    Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals    June 21, 2010   31 / 44
Computing an integral we estimated before


 Example
                      2
                          1
 Evaluate                   dx.
                  1       x

 Solution


                                                2
                                                    1
                                                      dx
                                            1       x




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   32 / 44
Computing an integral we estimated before


 Example
                      2
                          1
 Evaluate                   dx.
                  1       x

 Solution


                                                2
                                                    1
                                                      dx = ln x|2
                                                                1
                                            1       x




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   32 / 44
Computing an integral we estimated before


 Example
                      2
                          1
 Evaluate                   dx.
                  1       x

 Solution


                                                2
                                                    1
                                                      dx = ln x|2
                                                                1
                                            1       x
                                                         = ln 2 − ln 1




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   32 / 44
Computing an integral we estimated before


 Example
                      2
                          1
 Evaluate                   dx.
                  1       x

 Solution


                                                2
                                                    1
                                                      dx = ln x|2
                                                                1
                                            1       x
                                                         = ln 2 − ln 1
                                                         = ln 2




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   32 / 44
Outline

 Last time: The Definite Integral
    The definite integral as a limit
    Properties of the integral
    Comparison Properties of the Integral

 Evaluating Definite Integrals
    Examples

 The Integral as Total Change

 Indefinite Integrals
    My first table of integrals

 Computing Area with integrals


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   33 / 44
The Integral as Total Change


 Another way to state this theorem is:
                                            b
                                                F (x) dx = F (b) − F (a),
                                        a

 or the integral of a derivative along an interval is the total change between
 the sides of that interval. This has many ramifications:




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)       Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   34 / 44
The Integral as Total Change


 Another way to state this theorem is:
                                            b
                                                F (x) dx = F (b) − F (a),
                                        a

 or the integral of a derivative along an interval is the total change between
 the sides of that interval. This has many ramifications:

 Theorem
 If v (t) represents the velocity of a particle moving rectilinearly, then
                                            t1
                                                 v (t) dt = s(t1 ) − s(t0 ).
                                        t0




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)       Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   34 / 44
The Integral as Total Change


 Another way to state this theorem is:
                                            b
                                                F (x) dx = F (b) − F (a),
                                        a

 or the integral of a derivative along an interval is the total change between
 the sides of that interval. This has many ramifications:

 Theorem
 If MC (x) represents the marginal cost of making x units of a product, then
                                                                       x
                                   C (x) = C (0) +                         MC (q) dq.
                                                                   0




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)       Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals    June 21, 2010   34 / 44
The Integral as Total Change


 Another way to state this theorem is:
                                            b
                                                F (x) dx = F (b) − F (a),
                                        a

 or the integral of a derivative along an interval is the total change between
 the sides of that interval. This has many ramifications:

 Theorem
 If ρ(x) represents the density of a thin rod at a distance of x from its end,
 then the mass of the rod up to x is
                                                                   x
                                                m(x) =                 ρ(s) ds.
                                                               0


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)       Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   34 / 44
Outline

 Last time: The Definite Integral
    The definite integral as a limit
    Properties of the integral
    Comparison Properties of the Integral

 Evaluating Definite Integrals
    Examples

 The Integral as Total Change

 Indefinite Integrals
    My first table of integrals

 Computing Area with integrals


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   35 / 44
A new notation for antiderivatives



 To emphasize the relationship between antidifferentiation and integration,
 we use the indefinite integral notation

                                                        f (x) dx

 for any function whose derivative is f (x).




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   36 / 44
A new notation for antiderivatives



 To emphasize the relationship between antidifferentiation and integration,
 we use the indefinite integral notation

                                                        f (x) dx

 for any function whose derivative is f (x). Thus

                                               x 2 dx = 1 x 3 + C .
                                                        3




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   36 / 44
My first table of integrals


          [f (x) + g (x)] dx =          f (x) dx +      g (x) dx

                          x n+1
               x n dx =           + C (n = −1)                          cf (x) dx = c   f (x) dx
                          n+1
                                                                            1
                        e x dx = e x + C                                      dx = ln |x| + C
                                                                            x
                                                                                     ax
                   sin x dx = − cos x + C                                   ax dx =       +C
                                                                                    ln a

                     cos x dx = sin x + C                              csc2 x dx = − cot x + C

                    sec2 x dx = tan x + C                            csc x cot x dx = − csc x + C
                                                                           1
                 sec x tan x dx = sec x + C                          √          dx = arcsin x + C
                                                                         1 − x2
                   1
                        dx = arctan x + C
                 1 + x2



V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)    Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals           June 21, 2010   37 / 44
Outline

 Last time: The Definite Integral
    The definite integral as a limit
    Properties of the integral
    Comparison Properties of the Integral

 Evaluating Definite Integrals
    Examples

 The Integral as Total Change

 Indefinite Integrals
    My first table of integrals

 Computing Area with integrals


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   38 / 44
Example
 Find the area between the graph of y = (x − 1)(x − 2), the x-axis, and the
 vertical lines x = 0 and x = 3.




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   39 / 44
Example
 Find the area between the graph of y = (x − 1)(x − 2), the x-axis, and the
 vertical lines x = 0 and x = 3.

 Solution
                      3
 Consider                 (x − 1)(x − 2) dx.
                  0




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   39 / 44
Graph

                    y




                                                                                             x
                                           1                         2             3


V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals       June 21, 2010   40 / 44
Example
 Find the area between the graph of y = (x − 1)(x − 2), the x-axis, and the
 vertical lines x = 0 and x = 3.

 Solution
                      3
 Consider                 (x − 1)(x − 2) dx. Notice the integrand is positive on [0, 1)
                  0
 and (2, 3], and negative on (1, 2).




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   41 / 44
Example
 Find the area between the graph of y = (x − 1)(x − 2), the x-axis, and the
 vertical lines x = 0 and x = 3.

 Solution
                      3
 Consider                 (x − 1)(x − 2) dx. Notice the integrand is positive on [0, 1)
                  0
 and (2, 3], and negative on (1, 2). If we want the area of the region, we
 have to do
             1                                        2                                          3
  A=             (x − 1)(x − 2) dx −                      (x − 1)(x − 2) dx +                        (x − 1)(x − 2) dx
           0                                       1                                         2
           1 3                          1                                    2                                     3
      =    3x     − 2 x 2 + 2x
                    3
                                        0
                                            −    1 3
                                                 3x       − 3 x 2 + 2x
                                                            2                1
                                                                                 +     1 3
                                                                                       3x    − 2 x 2 + 2x
                                                                                               3
                                                                                                                   2
          5     1                 5  11
      =     − −               +     = .
          6     6                 6   6



V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)       Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals                    June 21, 2010   41 / 44
Interpretation of “negative area” in motion




 There is an analog in rectlinear motion:
            t1
                  v (t) dt is net distance traveled.
           t0
             t1
                  |v (t)| dt is total distance traveled.
           t0




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals   June 21, 2010   42 / 44
What about the constant?


         It seems we forgot about the +C when we say for instance
                                            1                    1
                                                           x4            1     1
                                                x 3 dx =             =     −0=
                                        0                  4     0       4     4

         But notice
                                    1
                       x4                        1                                 1         1
                          +C            =          +C       − (0 + C ) =             +C −C =
                       4            0            4                                 4         4

         no matter what C is.
         So in antidifferentiation for definite integrals, the constant is
         immaterial.



V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals         June 21, 2010   43 / 44
Summary



         The second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus:
                                               b
                                                   f (x) dx = F (b) − F (a)
                                           a

         where F = f .
         Definite integrals represent net change of a function over an interval.
         We write antiderivatives as indefinite integrals                           f (x) dx




V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU)   Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals       June 21, 2010   44 / 44

Lesson 26: Evaluating Definite Integrals

  • 1.
    Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I New York University June 21, 2010 Announcements Final Exam is Thursday in class
  • 2.
    Announcements Sections 5.3–5.4 today Section 5.5 tomorrow Review and Movie Day Wednesday Final exam Thursday roughly half-and-half MC/FR FR is all post-midterm MC might have some pre-midterm stuff on it V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 2 / 44
  • 3.
    Resurrection Policy Ifyour final score beats your midterm score, we will add 10% to its weight, and subtract 10% from the midterm weight. Image credit: Scott Beale / Laughing Squid V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 3 / 44
  • 4.
    Objectives Use the Evaluation Theorem to evaluate definite integrals. Write antiderivatives as indefinite integrals. Interpret definite integrals as “net change” of a function over an interval. V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 4 / 44
  • 5.
    Outline Last time:The Definite Integral The definite integral as a limit Properties of the integral Comparison Properties of the Integral Evaluating Definite Integrals Examples The Integral as Total Change Indefinite Integrals My first table of integrals Computing Area with integrals V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 5 / 44
  • 6.
    The definite integralas a limit Definition If f is a function defined on [a, b], the definite integral of f from a to b is the number b n f (x) dx = lim f (ci ) ∆x a n→∞ i=1 b−a where ∆x = , and for each i, xi = a + i∆x, and ci is a point in n [xi−1 , xi ]. Theorem If f is continuous on [a, b] or if f has only finitely many jump discontinuities, then f is integrable on [a, b]; that is, the definite integral b f (x) dx exists and is the same for any choice of ci . a V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 6 / 44
  • 7.
    Notation/Terminology b f (x) dx a — integral sign (swoopy S) f (x) — integrand a and b — limits of integration (a is the lower limit and b the upper limit) dx — ??? (a parenthesis? an infinitesimal? a variable?) The process of computing an integral is called integration V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 7 / 44
  • 8.
    Example 1 4 Estimate dx using the midpoint rule and four divisions. 0 1 + x2 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 8 / 44
  • 9.
    Example 1 4 Estimate dx using the midpoint rule and four divisions. 0 1 + x2 Solution Dividing up [0, 1] into 4 pieces gives 1 2 3 4 x0 = 0, x1 = , x2 = , x3 = , x4 = 4 4 4 4 So the midpoint rule gives 1 4 4 4 4 M4 = 2 + 2 + 2 + 4 1 + (1/8) 1 + (3/8) 1 + (5/8) 1 + (7/8)2 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 8 / 44
  • 10.
    Example 1 4 Estimate dx using the midpoint rule and four divisions. 0 1 + x2 Solution Dividing up [0, 1] into 4 pieces gives 1 2 3 4 x0 = 0, x1 = , x2 = , x3 = , x4 = 4 4 4 4 So the midpoint rule gives 1 4 4 4 4 M4 = 2 + 2 + 2 + 4 1 + (1/8) 1 + (3/8) 1 + (5/8) 1 + (7/8)2 1 4 4 4 4 = + + + 4 65/64 73/64 89/64 113/64 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 8 / 44
  • 11.
    Example 1 4 Estimate dx using the midpoint rule and four divisions. 0 1 + x2 Solution Dividing up [0, 1] into 4 pieces gives 1 2 3 4 x0 = 0, x1 = , x2 = , x3 = , x4 = 4 4 4 4 So the midpoint rule gives 1 4 4 4 4 M4 = 2 + 2 + 2 + 4 1 + (1/8) 1 + (3/8) 1 + (5/8) 1 + (7/8)2 1 4 4 4 4 = + + + 4 65/64 73/64 89/64 113/64 150, 166, 784 = ≈ 3.1468 47, 720, 465 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 8 / 44
  • 12.
    Properties of theintegral Theorem (Additive Properties of the Integral) Let f and g be integrable functions on [a, b] and c a constant. Then b 1. c dx = c(b − a) a b b b 2. [f (x) + g (x)] dx = f (x) dx + g (x) dx. a a a b b 3. cf (x) dx = c f (x) dx. a a b b b 4. [f (x) − g (x)] dx = f (x) dx − g (x) dx. a a a V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 9 / 44
  • 13.
    More Properties ofthe Integral Conventions: a b f (x) dx = − f (x) dx b a a f (x) dx = 0 a This allows us to have c b c 5. f (x) dx = f (x) dx + f (x) dx for all a, b, and c. a a b V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 10 / 44
  • 14.
    Definite Integrals WeKnow So Far If the integral computes an area and we know the area, we can use that. For y instance, 1 π 1 − x 2 dx = 0 2 By brute force we computed x 1 1 1 1 x 2 dx = x 3 dx = 0 3 0 4 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 11 / 44
  • 15.
    Comparison Properties ofthe Integral Theorem Let f and g be integrable functions on [a, b]. 6. If f (x) ≥ 0 for all x in [a, b], then b f (x) dx ≥ 0 a V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 12 / 44
  • 16.
    Integral of anonnegative function is nonnegative Proof. If f (x) ≥ 0 for all x in [a, b], then for any number of divisions n and choice of sample points {ci }: n n Sn = f (ci ) ∆x ≥ 0 · ∆x = 0 i=1 ≥0 i=1 Since Sn ≥ 0 for all n, the limit of {Sn } is nonnegative, too: b f (x) dx = lim Sn ≥ 0 a n→∞ ≥0 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 13 / 44
  • 17.
    Comparison Properties ofthe Integral Theorem Let f and g be integrable functions on [a, b]. 6. If f (x) ≥ 0 for all x in [a, b], then b f (x) dx ≥ 0 a 7. If f (x) ≥ g (x) for all x in [a, b], then b b f (x) dx ≥ g (x) dx a a V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 14 / 44
  • 18.
    The definite integralis “increasing” Proof. Let h(x) = f (x) − g (x). If f (x) ≥ g (x) for all x in [a, b], then h(x) ≥ 0 for all x in [a, b]. So by the previous property b h(x) dx ≥ 0 a This means that b b b b f (x) dx − g (x) dx = (f (x) − g (x)) dx = h(x) dx ≥ 0 a a a a So b b f (x) dx ≥ g (x) dx a a V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 15 / 44
  • 19.
    Comparison Properties ofthe Integral Theorem Let f and g be integrable functions on [a, b]. 6. If f (x) ≥ 0 for all x in [a, b], then b f (x) dx ≥ 0 a 7. If f (x) ≥ g (x) for all x in [a, b], then b b f (x) dx ≥ g (x) dx a a 8. If m ≤ f (x) ≤ M for all x in [a, b], then b m(b − a) ≤ f (x) dx ≤ M(b − a) a V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 16 / 44
  • 20.
    Bounding the integralusing bounds of the function Proof. If m ≤ f (x) ≤ M on for all x in [a, b], then by the previous property b b b m dx ≤ f (x) dx ≤ M dx a a a By Property 1, the integral of a constant function is the product of the constant and the width of the interval. So: b m(b − a) ≤ f (x) dx ≤ M(b − a) a V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 17 / 44
  • 21.
    Estimating an integralwith inequalities Example 2 1 Estimate dx using Property 8. 1 x V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 18 / 44
  • 22.
    Estimating an integralwith inequalities Example 2 1 Estimate dx using Property 8. 1 x Solution Since 1 1 1 1 ≤ x ≤ 2 =⇒ ≤ ≤ 2 x 1 we have 2 1 1 · (2 − 1) ≤ dx ≤ 1 · (2 − 1) 2 1 x or 2 1 1 ≤ dx ≤ 1 2 1 x V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 18 / 44
  • 23.
    Outline Last time:The Definite Integral The definite integral as a limit Properties of the integral Comparison Properties of the Integral Evaluating Definite Integrals Examples The Integral as Total Change Indefinite Integrals My first table of integrals Computing Area with integrals V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 19 / 44
  • 24.
    Socratic proof The definite integral of velocity measures displacement (net distance) The derivative of displacement is velocity So we can compute displacement with the definite integral or the antiderivative of velocity But any function can be a velocity function, so . . . V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 20 / 44
  • 25.
    Theorem of theDay Theorem (The Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus) Suppose f is integrable on [a, b] and f = F for another function F , then b f (x) dx = F (b) − F (a). a V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 21 / 44
  • 26.
    Theorem of theDay Theorem (The Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus) Suppose f is integrable on [a, b] and f = F for another function F , then b f (x) dx = F (b) − F (a). a Note In Section 5.3, this theorem is called “The Evaluation Theorem”. Nobody else in the world calls it that. V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 21 / 44
  • 27.
    Proving the SecondFTC b−a Divide up [a, b] into n pieces of equal width ∆x = as usual. For n each i, F is continuous on [xi−1 , xi ] and differentiable on (xi−1 , xi ). So there is a point ci in (xi−1 , xi ) with F (xi ) − F (xi−1 ) = F (ci ) = f (ci ) xi − xi−1 Or f (ci )∆x = F (xi ) − F (xi−1 ) V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 22 / 44
  • 28.
    Proof continued Wehave for each i f (ci )∆x = F (xi ) − F (xi−1 ) Form the Riemann Sum: n n Sn = f (ci )∆x = (F (xi ) − F (xi−1 )) i=1 i=1 = (F (x1 ) − F (x0 )) + (F (x2 ) − F (x1 )) + (F (x3 ) − F (x2 )) + · · · · · · + (F (xn−1 ) − F (xn−2 )) + (F (xn ) − F (xn−1 )) = F (xn ) − F (x0 ) = F (b) − F (a) V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 23 / 44
  • 29.
    Proof continued Wehave for each i f (ci )∆x = F (xi ) − F (xi−1 ) Form the Riemann Sum: n n Sn = f (ci )∆x = (F (xi ) − F (xi−1 )) i=1 i=1 = (F (x1 ) − F (x0 )) + (F (x2 ) − F (x1 )) + (F (x3 ) − F (x2 )) + · · · · · · + (F (xn−1 ) − F (xn−2 )) + (F (xn ) − F (xn−1 )) = F (xn ) − F (x0 ) = F (b) − F (a) See if you can spot the invocation of the Mean Value Theorem! V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 23 / 44
  • 30.
    Proof Completed Wehave shown for each n, Sn = F (b) − F (a) so in the limit b f (x) dx = lim Sn = lim (F (b) − F (a)) = F (b) − F (a) a n→∞ n→∞ V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 24 / 44
  • 31.
    Computing area withthe Second FTC Example Find the area between y = x 3 and the x-axis, between x = 0 and x = 1. V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 25 / 44
  • 32.
    Computing area withthe Second FTC Example Find the area between y = x 3 and the x-axis, between x = 0 and x = 1. Solution 1 1 x4 1 A= x 3 dx = = 0 4 0 4 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 25 / 44
  • 33.
    Computing area withthe Second FTC Example Find the area between y = x 3 and the x-axis, between x = 0 and x = 1. Solution 1 1 x4 1 A= x 3 dx = = 0 4 0 4 Here we use the notation F (x)|b or [F (x)]b to mean F (b) − F (a). a a V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 25 / 44
  • 34.
    Computing area withthe Second FTC Example Find the area enclosed by the parabola y = x 2 and y = 1. V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 26 / 44
  • 35.
    Computing area withthe Second FTC Example Find the area enclosed by the parabola y = x 2 and y = 1. 1 −1 1 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 26 / 44
  • 36.
    Computing area withthe Second FTC Example Find the area enclosed by the parabola y = x 2 and y = 1. 1 −1 1 Solution 1 1 x3 1 1 4 A=2− x 2 dx = 2 − =2− − − = −1 3 −1 3 3 3 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 26 / 44
  • 37.
    Computing an integralwe estimated before Example 1 4 Evaluate the integral dx. 0 1 + x2 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 27 / 44
  • 38.
    Example 1 4 Estimate dx using the midpoint rule and four divisions. 0 1 + x2 Solution Dividing up [0, 1] into 4 pieces gives 1 2 3 4 x0 = 0, x1 = , x2 = , x3 = , x4 = 4 4 4 4 So the midpoint rule gives 1 4 4 4 4 M4 = 2 + 2 + 2 + 4 1 + (1/8) 1 + (3/8) 1 + (5/8) 1 + (7/8)2 1 4 4 4 4 = + + + 4 65/64 73/64 89/64 113/64 150, 166, 784 = ≈ 3.1468 47, 720, 465 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 28 / 44
  • 39.
    Computing an integralwe estimated before Example 1 4 Evaluate the integral dx. 0 1 + x2 Solution 1 1 4 1 dx = 4 dx 0 1 + x2 0 1 + x2 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 29 / 44
  • 40.
    Computing an integralwe estimated before Example 1 4 Evaluate the integral dx. 0 1 + x2 Solution 1 1 4 1 dx = 4 dx 0 1 + x2 0 1 + x2 = 4 arctan(x)|1 0 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 29 / 44
  • 41.
    Computing an integralwe estimated before Example 1 4 Evaluate the integral dx. 0 1 + x2 Solution 1 1 4 1 dx = 4 dx 0 1 + x2 0 1 + x2 = 4 arctan(x)|1 0 = 4 (arctan 1 − arctan 0) V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 29 / 44
  • 42.
    Computing an integralwe estimated before Example 1 4 Evaluate the integral dx. 0 1 + x2 Solution 1 1 4 1 dx = 4 dx 0 1 + x2 0 1 + x2 = 4 arctan(x)|1 0 = 4 (arctan 1 − arctan 0) π =4 −0 4 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 29 / 44
  • 43.
    Computing an integralwe estimated before Example 1 4 Evaluate the integral dx. 0 1 + x2 Solution 1 1 4 1 dx = 4 dx 0 1 + x2 0 1 + x2 = 4 arctan(x)|1 0 = 4 (arctan 1 − arctan 0) π =4 −0 =π 4 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 29 / 44
  • 44.
    Computing an integralwe estimated before Example 2 1 Evaluate dx. 1 x V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 30 / 44
  • 45.
    Estimating an integralwith inequalities Example 2 1 Estimate dx using Property 8. 1 x Solution Since 1 1 1 1 ≤ x ≤ 2 =⇒ ≤ ≤ 2 x 1 we have 2 1 1 · (2 − 1) ≤ dx ≤ 1 · (2 − 1) 2 1 x or 2 1 1 ≤ dx ≤ 1 2 1 x V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 31 / 44
  • 46.
    Computing an integralwe estimated before Example 2 1 Evaluate dx. 1 x Solution 2 1 dx 1 x V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 32 / 44
  • 47.
    Computing an integralwe estimated before Example 2 1 Evaluate dx. 1 x Solution 2 1 dx = ln x|2 1 1 x V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 32 / 44
  • 48.
    Computing an integralwe estimated before Example 2 1 Evaluate dx. 1 x Solution 2 1 dx = ln x|2 1 1 x = ln 2 − ln 1 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 32 / 44
  • 49.
    Computing an integralwe estimated before Example 2 1 Evaluate dx. 1 x Solution 2 1 dx = ln x|2 1 1 x = ln 2 − ln 1 = ln 2 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 32 / 44
  • 50.
    Outline Last time:The Definite Integral The definite integral as a limit Properties of the integral Comparison Properties of the Integral Evaluating Definite Integrals Examples The Integral as Total Change Indefinite Integrals My first table of integrals Computing Area with integrals V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 33 / 44
  • 51.
    The Integral asTotal Change Another way to state this theorem is: b F (x) dx = F (b) − F (a), a or the integral of a derivative along an interval is the total change between the sides of that interval. This has many ramifications: V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 34 / 44
  • 52.
    The Integral asTotal Change Another way to state this theorem is: b F (x) dx = F (b) − F (a), a or the integral of a derivative along an interval is the total change between the sides of that interval. This has many ramifications: Theorem If v (t) represents the velocity of a particle moving rectilinearly, then t1 v (t) dt = s(t1 ) − s(t0 ). t0 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 34 / 44
  • 53.
    The Integral asTotal Change Another way to state this theorem is: b F (x) dx = F (b) − F (a), a or the integral of a derivative along an interval is the total change between the sides of that interval. This has many ramifications: Theorem If MC (x) represents the marginal cost of making x units of a product, then x C (x) = C (0) + MC (q) dq. 0 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 34 / 44
  • 54.
    The Integral asTotal Change Another way to state this theorem is: b F (x) dx = F (b) − F (a), a or the integral of a derivative along an interval is the total change between the sides of that interval. This has many ramifications: Theorem If ρ(x) represents the density of a thin rod at a distance of x from its end, then the mass of the rod up to x is x m(x) = ρ(s) ds. 0 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 34 / 44
  • 55.
    Outline Last time:The Definite Integral The definite integral as a limit Properties of the integral Comparison Properties of the Integral Evaluating Definite Integrals Examples The Integral as Total Change Indefinite Integrals My first table of integrals Computing Area with integrals V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 35 / 44
  • 56.
    A new notationfor antiderivatives To emphasize the relationship between antidifferentiation and integration, we use the indefinite integral notation f (x) dx for any function whose derivative is f (x). V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 36 / 44
  • 57.
    A new notationfor antiderivatives To emphasize the relationship between antidifferentiation and integration, we use the indefinite integral notation f (x) dx for any function whose derivative is f (x). Thus x 2 dx = 1 x 3 + C . 3 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 36 / 44
  • 58.
    My first tableof integrals [f (x) + g (x)] dx = f (x) dx + g (x) dx x n+1 x n dx = + C (n = −1) cf (x) dx = c f (x) dx n+1 1 e x dx = e x + C dx = ln |x| + C x ax sin x dx = − cos x + C ax dx = +C ln a cos x dx = sin x + C csc2 x dx = − cot x + C sec2 x dx = tan x + C csc x cot x dx = − csc x + C 1 sec x tan x dx = sec x + C √ dx = arcsin x + C 1 − x2 1 dx = arctan x + C 1 + x2 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 37 / 44
  • 59.
    Outline Last time:The Definite Integral The definite integral as a limit Properties of the integral Comparison Properties of the Integral Evaluating Definite Integrals Examples The Integral as Total Change Indefinite Integrals My first table of integrals Computing Area with integrals V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 38 / 44
  • 60.
    Example Find thearea between the graph of y = (x − 1)(x − 2), the x-axis, and the vertical lines x = 0 and x = 3. V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 39 / 44
  • 61.
    Example Find thearea between the graph of y = (x − 1)(x − 2), the x-axis, and the vertical lines x = 0 and x = 3. Solution 3 Consider (x − 1)(x − 2) dx. 0 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 39 / 44
  • 62.
    Graph y x 1 2 3 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 40 / 44
  • 63.
    Example Find thearea between the graph of y = (x − 1)(x − 2), the x-axis, and the vertical lines x = 0 and x = 3. Solution 3 Consider (x − 1)(x − 2) dx. Notice the integrand is positive on [0, 1) 0 and (2, 3], and negative on (1, 2). V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 41 / 44
  • 64.
    Example Find thearea between the graph of y = (x − 1)(x − 2), the x-axis, and the vertical lines x = 0 and x = 3. Solution 3 Consider (x − 1)(x − 2) dx. Notice the integrand is positive on [0, 1) 0 and (2, 3], and negative on (1, 2). If we want the area of the region, we have to do 1 2 3 A= (x − 1)(x − 2) dx − (x − 1)(x − 2) dx + (x − 1)(x − 2) dx 0 1 2 1 3 1 2 3 = 3x − 2 x 2 + 2x 3 0 − 1 3 3x − 3 x 2 + 2x 2 1 + 1 3 3x − 2 x 2 + 2x 3 2 5 1 5 11 = − − + = . 6 6 6 6 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 41 / 44
  • 65.
    Interpretation of “negativearea” in motion There is an analog in rectlinear motion: t1 v (t) dt is net distance traveled. t0 t1 |v (t)| dt is total distance traveled. t0 V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 42 / 44
  • 66.
    What about theconstant? It seems we forgot about the +C when we say for instance 1 1 x4 1 1 x 3 dx = = −0= 0 4 0 4 4 But notice 1 x4 1 1 1 +C = +C − (0 + C ) = +C −C = 4 0 4 4 4 no matter what C is. So in antidifferentiation for definite integrals, the constant is immaterial. V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 43 / 44
  • 67.
    Summary The second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: b f (x) dx = F (b) − F (a) a where F = f . Definite integrals represent net change of a function over an interval. We write antiderivatives as indefinite integrals f (x) dx V63.0121.002.2010Su, Calculus I (NYU) Section 5.3 Evaluating Definite Integrals June 21, 2010 44 / 44