Fun and Fear
                                      in Open
                                      Spaces
                                          Media Zoo
                                         University of
Image from kurtxio
                                          Leicester
                     Jon Dron and Terry Anderson
Unpaid ADVERTISEMENT
Issues in Distance
Education Series

aupress.ca
www.irrodl.org
Values
We can (and must) continuously improve the
  quality, effectiveness, appeal, cost and time
  efficiency of the learning experience.
Student control and freedom is integral to 21st
  Century life-long education and learning.
Education for elites is not sufficient for
  planetary survival
Pervasive Openness




                     4
University as a More Open
       Community




                            5
agoraphobia




the fear of open spaces


                          2
agoraphilia




the love of open spaces


                          3
Which networks do you use
 and find useful? Why?




                     Anyothers?
Social forms
       collective




 net                set



       group
The Learning Management Systems
              or VLE
•   Fixed periods of engagement
•   limited learner control
•   teaching-led
•   Closed
•   Private
                                  group
Athabasca Landing
A Wordle view of Landing rationale   5
An open space to
          share...
  Anyone can
 share anything
  with anyone.
Open in time and
   in space.
Multiple rationales
                                     collective


Sustaining ties
                                                        Cooperation
Making ties
                                                        Sharing
Ad hoc networks
                                                        Serendipity
Knowledge diffusion            net                set   Interest -orientation
Social capital
                                                        Sense-making
Social presence
                                                        Collective intelligence
                                                        Intentional discovery
                                     group


                       Courses
                       Committees
                       Research groups
                       Study groups
                       Centres and departments
                                                                          15
“Your Friends Make you Fat”




Fowler & Christakis (2007)
A study of Obesity http://www.world-science.net/othernews/070725_obesity.htm
They can also make you smart!




Fowler & Christakis (2007)
A study of Obesity http://www.world-science.net/othernews/070725_obesity.htm
The Closed Garden versus Facebook

•   Boutique networks
•   Differentiating work, from school, from fun
•   Context is king
•   social networking a
    feature, not a
    destination
A Guided Tour of the Landing
  https://landing.athabascau.ca




                                  18
Athabasca Landing
Tool                 Instances
Users:               2657
Messages:            21762
Files:               3561
Blog posts:          3348
Wire posts:          1921
Bookmarked items:    1550
Discussion topics:   1305
Pages:               853
Photos:              788
Top-level pages:     530
Event Calendar:      171
Albums:              109
Bookmark Folder:     87
Polls:               69
New Users Added per Month
Monthly Blog Posts
Landing Groups

•271 Groups
•Average of 9 .39 members each
•42% of population a member of one or more
groups
•Of these, members of 8 groups (on average)
Social networking a
       feature, not a
         destination
• 35% of people followed by
    someone else (long tail shown
    here)
•   22% following someone else
•   17% reciprocal
•   4% members of nets and not
    groups
•   24% in groups but not nets
Content creation and
    the long tail

•   28% are content creators
•   61% of content created by 1% of those
•   33% by next 10%
•   90% of the 28% of people creating
    content create 6% of it
A soft space




               24
Public vs private
• It all depends on context and purpose...
                PUBLIC    SET    NET     GROUP


  Blogs         36%       50%    2%      11%

  Wikis (8.5%
                18%       45%    2%      26%
  private)

  Bookmarks     9%        65%    0.5%    24%


  Images        6%        75%    6%      10%



                                                 25
Public vs private




                    26
Groups
•   Safety
•   familiarity (in education)
•   formality
•   trust                        group
•   scaffolding
•   structure
•   Reliability
•   Group think                      Scariness
•   Cliques, hidden curriculum
                                                 27
Networks
•   Connectivity
•   strength of weak ties
•   blurred boundaries
•   shifting contexts         net
•   risk
•   insecurity
•   partial openness                Scariness

•   (appear) unstructured
                                                28
Sets
•   anonymity
•   Openness
•   Aggregated traces
•   analytics                  set
•   Danger
•   Imposed structure
•   loss of identity                 Scariness

•   unreliability
                                                 29
Why open?
•   Greater interaction and feedback
•   Transparency
•   Social capital
•   Self-promotion
•   Altruism
•   Course requirements
•   Good ideas

                                       30
Why not open?
•   Fear of ....
    •   loss of face
    •   loss of privacy
    •   legal issues
    •   loss of control
    •   permanence
    •   freeloaders
    •   being unkind (especially wikis)
    •   exposure
    •   the unknown
Original Metrics
To increase the ease and effectiveness with   Quantitative

which people at AU can create, sustain and       Spread of social networks (number of users)
                                                 Profile Use
discover relationships and work
collaboratively, both professionally and
                                              Qualitative
personally
                                                 Interviews
                                                 Focus groups
Original Metrics
To increase the ease with which    Quantitative
information and knowledge can be      Number and change in wire useage
shared outside formal channels        Creation of groups
                                      Number of blog posts
                                      Use by university leaders
                                   Qualitative
                                      Interviews
                                      Focus groups
Original Metrics
Integrate of services with existing   Quantitative
provisions                               Successful integration of software
                                         with Moodle, external blogs, twitter,
                                         Wonderland,Zimbra, library, etc
                                         Effectiveness of single sign on
Original Metrics
To enable the use of such services in      Quantitative
formal as well as informal education and      Use in formal courses
research                                      Use by research groups
                                              Creation of „learning‟ groups
                                             (task, subject focused)
                                             Number of “beyond the course”
                                             learning groups
                                           Qualitative
                                              Interviews
                                              Focus groups
Strategies for openness in social
                 spaces
•   Selective access control
•   Context control
•   Use of defaults
•   Establishment of norms
•   Valorisation of open content
•   Help and resources
•   Open discussion
•   Policies and rules
                                        32
Final Questionable Implication




   equivalencytheorem.info       39
40
41
The Interaction Equivalency (EQuiv) Website
         http://equivalencytheorem.info/




Anderson, T. (2003 )Getting the Mix Right Again: An updated and theoretical
                                                                              42
                          rationale for interaction.
OERu
• Can OERs + Student Networking eliminate the
  cost of teachers??




                                                43
OERu as a
Disruptive Technology




Clayton Christiansen 2012
• “The pessimist complains about the wind, the
  optimist expects it to change, the realist adjusts the
  sails.” William Arthur Ward (1921 – 1994)
https://landing.athabascau.ca/pg/profile/jond




         Your comments and
         questions are most
             welcomed
https://landing.athabascau.ca/pg/profile/terrya

Leicester 2011

  • 1.
    Fun and Fear in Open Spaces Media Zoo University of Image from kurtxio Leicester Jon Dron and Terry Anderson
  • 2.
    Unpaid ADVERTISEMENT Issues inDistance Education Series aupress.ca www.irrodl.org
  • 3.
    Values We can (andmust) continuously improve the quality, effectiveness, appeal, cost and time efficiency of the learning experience. Student control and freedom is integral to 21st Century life-long education and learning. Education for elites is not sufficient for planetary survival
  • 4.
  • 5.
    University as aMore Open Community 5
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Which networks doyou use and find useful? Why? Anyothers?
  • 9.
    Social forms collective net set group
  • 10.
    The Learning ManagementSystems or VLE • Fixed periods of engagement • limited learner control • teaching-led • Closed • Private group
  • 11.
  • 12.
    A Wordle viewof Landing rationale 5
  • 13.
    An open spaceto share... Anyone can share anything with anyone. Open in time and in space.
  • 14.
    Multiple rationales collective Sustaining ties Cooperation Making ties Sharing Ad hoc networks Serendipity Knowledge diffusion net set Interest -orientation Social capital Sense-making Social presence Collective intelligence Intentional discovery group Courses Committees Research groups Study groups Centres and departments 15
  • 15.
    “Your Friends Makeyou Fat” Fowler & Christakis (2007) A study of Obesity http://www.world-science.net/othernews/070725_obesity.htm
  • 16.
    They can alsomake you smart! Fowler & Christakis (2007) A study of Obesity http://www.world-science.net/othernews/070725_obesity.htm
  • 17.
    The Closed Gardenversus Facebook • Boutique networks • Differentiating work, from school, from fun • Context is king • social networking a feature, not a destination
  • 18.
    A Guided Tourof the Landing https://landing.athabascau.ca 18
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Tool Instances Users: 2657 Messages: 21762 Files: 3561 Blog posts: 3348 Wire posts: 1921 Bookmarked items: 1550 Discussion topics: 1305 Pages: 853 Photos: 788 Top-level pages: 530 Event Calendar: 171 Albums: 109 Bookmark Folder: 87 Polls: 69
  • 21.
    New Users Addedper Month
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Landing Groups •271 Groups •Averageof 9 .39 members each •42% of population a member of one or more groups •Of these, members of 8 groups (on average)
  • 24.
    Social networking a feature, not a destination • 35% of people followed by someone else (long tail shown here) • 22% following someone else • 17% reciprocal • 4% members of nets and not groups • 24% in groups but not nets
  • 25.
    Content creation and the long tail • 28% are content creators • 61% of content created by 1% of those • 33% by next 10% • 90% of the 28% of people creating content create 6% of it
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Public vs private •It all depends on context and purpose... PUBLIC SET NET GROUP Blogs 36% 50% 2% 11% Wikis (8.5% 18% 45% 2% 26% private) Bookmarks 9% 65% 0.5% 24% Images 6% 75% 6% 10% 25
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Groups • Safety • familiarity (in education) • formality • trust group • scaffolding • structure • Reliability • Group think Scariness • Cliques, hidden curriculum 27
  • 30.
    Networks • Connectivity • strength of weak ties • blurred boundaries • shifting contexts net • risk • insecurity • partial openness Scariness • (appear) unstructured 28
  • 31.
    Sets • anonymity • Openness • Aggregated traces • analytics set • Danger • Imposed structure • loss of identity Scariness • unreliability 29
  • 32.
    Why open? • Greater interaction and feedback • Transparency • Social capital • Self-promotion • Altruism • Course requirements • Good ideas 30
  • 33.
    Why not open? • Fear of .... • loss of face • loss of privacy • legal issues • loss of control • permanence • freeloaders • being unkind (especially wikis) • exposure • the unknown
  • 34.
    Original Metrics To increasethe ease and effectiveness with Quantitative which people at AU can create, sustain and Spread of social networks (number of users) Profile Use discover relationships and work collaboratively, both professionally and Qualitative personally Interviews Focus groups
  • 35.
    Original Metrics To increasethe ease with which Quantitative information and knowledge can be Number and change in wire useage shared outside formal channels Creation of groups Number of blog posts Use by university leaders Qualitative Interviews Focus groups
  • 36.
    Original Metrics Integrate ofservices with existing Quantitative provisions Successful integration of software with Moodle, external blogs, twitter, Wonderland,Zimbra, library, etc Effectiveness of single sign on
  • 37.
    Original Metrics To enablethe use of such services in Quantitative formal as well as informal education and Use in formal courses research Use by research groups Creation of „learning‟ groups (task, subject focused) Number of “beyond the course” learning groups Qualitative Interviews Focus groups
  • 38.
    Strategies for opennessin social spaces • Selective access control • Context control • Use of defaults • Establishment of norms • Valorisation of open content • Help and resources • Open discussion • Policies and rules 32
  • 39.
    Final Questionable Implication equivalencytheorem.info 39
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
    The Interaction Equivalency(EQuiv) Website http://equivalencytheorem.info/ Anderson, T. (2003 )Getting the Mix Right Again: An updated and theoretical 42 rationale for interaction.
  • 43.
    OERu • Can OERs+ Student Networking eliminate the cost of teachers?? 43
  • 44.
    OERu as a DisruptiveTechnology Clayton Christiansen 2012
  • 45.
    • “The pessimistcomplains about the wind, the optimist expects it to change, the realist adjusts the sails.” William Arthur Ward (1921 – 1994)
  • 46.
    https://landing.athabascau.ca/pg/profile/jond Your comments and questions are most welcomed https://landing.athabascau.ca/pg/profile/terrya