• Ion Channels
Lecture 1 –Nernst Equation,
Ohm’s Law, Patch Clamp
Permeation and Gating
Learning Objectives
1. Know the classes of all membrane transport proteins and distinguish them according to
rates of transport.
2. Know the transporter reconstitution into liposomes method of studying the transport
process.
3. Describe Glucose transport through GLUT1 transporters as an example of a uniport-
catalyzed transport system. Know the mechanism thought to account for transport through
uniporters.
4. Understand how distribution of unbalanced charges at the membrane boundary accounts for
membrane potentials.
5. Know the distribution (low vs. high) of the four major ions in most mammalian cells.
6. Know the thermodynamic derivation of the Nernst Equation and be comfortable explaining it
qualitatively.
7. Given a membrane potential be able to determine the flow of ions (for a particular
distribution in and out of the cell) considering the relative magnitude and direction of the
chemical and electrical forces.
8. Be able to use Ohm’s law to determine the currents flowing through the cell membrane.
9. Given a membrane potential be able to determine the flow of ions (for a particular
distribution in and out of the cell) considering Ohm’s Law.
10. Know the different types of Ion Channels and the major features they possess.
11. Understand how the balance of currents determines the membrane potential.
12. Know the voltage clamp and all modes of the patch clamp techniques.
13. Predict how ion flux through a particular ion channel will influence the
membrane potential.
14. Understand how K ion selectivity, permeation and gating occurs.
From: Structure and function of facilitative sugar transporters.
Barrett et al, Current Opinion in Cell Biology 11, 496-502 (1999).
Distribution of Ions and the
Resting Potential
Na+
= 145 mM
Ca++
= 2 mM
K+
= 5 mM
Cl-
= 125 mM
Na+
= 15 mM
Ca++
= .0001 mM
K+
= 145 mM
Cl-
= 10 mM
Equlibrium potentials for major permeable ionic
species
In myocytes:
ENa = 61.5 log (145/15) = + 60 mV
ECa = 61.5 log (2/.0001) = + 131 mV
ECl = -61.5 log (125/ 10) = - 67 mV
EK = 61.5 log (5/ 145) = - 89 mV
Atomic Resolution Structures
Selectivity and Permeation
Atomic Resolution Structures
Gating
Inwardly rectifying K channels
Permeation pathways of Kir3.4 in a “closed” state and
Kv1.2 in an “open” state
From Nishida et al., 2007 EMBO J
26:4005-4015
PIP2 and the
cytoplasmic gates

Lecture 1 Dl.ppt

  • 1.
    • Ion Channels Lecture1 –Nernst Equation, Ohm’s Law, Patch Clamp Permeation and Gating
  • 2.
    Learning Objectives 1. Knowthe classes of all membrane transport proteins and distinguish them according to rates of transport. 2. Know the transporter reconstitution into liposomes method of studying the transport process. 3. Describe Glucose transport through GLUT1 transporters as an example of a uniport- catalyzed transport system. Know the mechanism thought to account for transport through uniporters. 4. Understand how distribution of unbalanced charges at the membrane boundary accounts for membrane potentials. 5. Know the distribution (low vs. high) of the four major ions in most mammalian cells. 6. Know the thermodynamic derivation of the Nernst Equation and be comfortable explaining it qualitatively. 7. Given a membrane potential be able to determine the flow of ions (for a particular distribution in and out of the cell) considering the relative magnitude and direction of the chemical and electrical forces. 8. Be able to use Ohm’s law to determine the currents flowing through the cell membrane. 9. Given a membrane potential be able to determine the flow of ions (for a particular distribution in and out of the cell) considering Ohm’s Law. 10. Know the different types of Ion Channels and the major features they possess. 11. Understand how the balance of currents determines the membrane potential. 12. Know the voltage clamp and all modes of the patch clamp techniques. 13. Predict how ion flux through a particular ion channel will influence the membrane potential. 14. Understand how K ion selectivity, permeation and gating occurs.
  • 6.
    From: Structure andfunction of facilitative sugar transporters. Barrett et al, Current Opinion in Cell Biology 11, 496-502 (1999).
  • 10.
    Distribution of Ionsand the Resting Potential Na+ = 145 mM Ca++ = 2 mM K+ = 5 mM Cl- = 125 mM Na+ = 15 mM Ca++ = .0001 mM K+ = 145 mM Cl- = 10 mM
  • 11.
    Equlibrium potentials formajor permeable ionic species In myocytes: ENa = 61.5 log (145/15) = + 60 mV ECa = 61.5 log (2/.0001) = + 131 mV ECl = -61.5 log (125/ 10) = - 67 mV EK = 61.5 log (5/ 145) = - 89 mV
  • 21.
  • 34.
  • 40.
  • 41.
    Permeation pathways ofKir3.4 in a “closed” state and Kv1.2 in an “open” state
  • 42.
    From Nishida etal., 2007 EMBO J 26:4005-4015
  • 43.

Editor's Notes

  • #11 In the normal myocyte, depolarization results from inward sodium current. The plateau phase results from a balance of inward calcium current and outward potassium current, and finally, repolarization results from unopposed outward potassium current.
  • #42 The Figure shows the transmembrane permeation pathways a) of a model of the Kir3.41,2,3 channel that is gated open by the  subunits of G proteins (G)4 but in their absence is thought to reside in the closed state (left), and b) the equivalent region of the Kv1.2 channel that is gated open by membrane depolarization and in the crystallographic snapshot shown5,6 it is thought to be partially open (right). The transmembrane pores of these two very different channels reveal a strikingly similar design with interesting variations. Substitutions of a prokaryotic pore into eukaryotic Kir or Kv channels have produced chimeric channels that have retained the respective functional hallmarks of the eukaryotic channels, indicating that the ion conduction pore is indeed conserved among K+ channels7 and that our approach of closely comparing the gating apparatus of Kir3.4 with that of Kv1.2 is likely to yield a detailed understanding of their similarities that serve both channels and their differences that serve specifically one or the other type of channel. Two Gates and control of the SF gate: Water and ions filling the permeation pathway (shown in blue) give a visual appreciation of the location of two putative gates: the Selectivity Filter (SF or extracellular gate) and the Inner Helix (TM2) Bundle Crossing (HBC or intracellular gate)8. The SF not only selects K+ over other ions but also serves as a gate. It possesses the triplet GYG, which is the most highly conserved motif among K+ channels. The HBC gate seems to be localized at exact corresponding positions in the two channels (Kir3.4 F1879 and Kv1.2 V40910). Systematic mutagenesis of each Kv1 residue shown in the structure has identified two clusters of mutants that affect gating: one where each inner helix contacts the Pore Helix (P-HLX) and the other where the inner helices cross each other at the HBC11. The SF gate of Kir3.4 seems to also be controlled by residues in its vicinity localized at the P-HLX or the P-loop (e.g. Kir3.4 S143 and Kir3.4 E147)12, 13, 14. LABEL THE HBC, Slide HLX/S4-S5 LNK, P-HLX, TM1, TM2