Kirkpatrick Model

•Download as PPT, PDF•

5 likes•2,869 views

The Kirkpatrick model is a framework for evaluating training programs with four levels: 1) Participant reaction, 2) Learning, 3) Behavior, and 4) Results. Level 1 measures participant satisfaction. Level 2 assesses knowledge gained immediately after training. Level 3 evaluates extent of behavior and knowledge application months later. Level 4 determines if training impacted organizational goals. The model provides tools to design evaluation forms, tests, and follow-up methods at each level to capture a program's full impact.

Kirkpatrick model ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Level 1/ Reaction ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What it can not measure? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Designing level 1 evaluation form ,[object Object],[object Object]

Guidelines to make evaluation form ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Level2/ learning ,[object Object],[object Object]

Tests ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Level3/ purpose ,[object Object],[object Object]

Follow-up methods ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Other methods ,[object Object],[object Object]

Level4/ Evaluation-Results ,[object Object],[object Object]

Donald Kirkpatrick, Professor Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin and past president of the American Society for Training and Development (ASTD), first published his Four-Level Training Evaluation Model in 1959, in the US Training and Development Journal. The model was then updated in 1975, and again in 1994, when he published his best-known work, "Evaluating Training Programs." It is a four level training evaluation model. It helps trainers to measure the effectiveness of their training in an objective way. Kirkpatrick’s model is a worldwide standard for evaluating the effectiveness of training.

Kirkpatrick model

SanK6

Kirk Patrick's Level of EvaluationPeinee Chaw

Adlt 606 class 11 kirkpatrick's evaluation model short versiontjcarter

The purpose for Kirkpatrick’s evaluation is to determine the effectiveness of a training program. According to this model, evaluation should always begin with level one, and then, as time and budget allows, should move sequentially through levels two, three, and four. Information from each prior level serves as a base for the next level\'s evaluation. The purpose of Brinkerhoff’s SCM to prove and to improve impact. It is a cost effective way in determining which components of initiative are working and which are not, and reporting result in a way that organizational leaders can easily understand and believe.

Training & Development ppt

Manoj Kumar

Training – Introduction – Definition – Scope – Objectives – Benefits of Training – Designing of effective Training – Opportunities and Challenges for Training – Learning – Training – Development – Education – Meaning – Concepts – Differences Need Assessment – Reasons for analyzing the Training Needs – Identification of Training Needs – Steps to conduct a Need Assessment – TNA Model – Organizational Analysis – Operational Analysis – Person Analysis – Gather data for TNA Training Design – Introduction – Perspective for Designing training – Building a Training Design – Learning Objectives – Components and Methods – Training Process – Key factors in designing – General features of good demonstration – Training of Trainers programs – Skills of an effective Trainer Methods of Training – On-the-Job – Off-the-Job – Management Games, Case study method, Role play method – In-basket Exercises, Laboratory training – Experiential Learning Techniques – Brain storming, Syndicate method, Discussion method, Outward Bound Learning, Sensitivity Training in Organization – A practical tool – The Fish Bowl Exercise - E-Learning and use of Technology as Training Training Evaluation – Introduction – Reasons for evaluating training – Outcomes used in the evaluation of the training programs – Factors determining the outcomes of Evaluation – Evaluation Techniques and Instruments – Resistance to training evaluation – Future of Training and Development

Training And Development

Premnath R

Training evaluation

Mis bah

Training & Development - Role & Skills of Trainer

M R Jhalawad

Measuring ROI of Training

Yodhia Antariksa

Evaluation of training effectiveness

CommLab India – Rapid eLearning Solutions

Employee training & developmentprakashshankar

Training evaluation models

Megha Anilkumar

Four Levels Of Evaluation (Kirkpatrick Model) By Ravinder Tulsiani

Ravinder Tulsiani

Training Needs Analysis

Dr. Peeyush Verma

Morrison, Ross & Kemp (MRK) Modelshortele

Evaluation of Training & Development

Megha0000

What's hot

Kirkpatrick's model

cindyyew

Kirkpatrick model

Gaurav Patil

Kirkpatrick's Four Levels Of Evaluation Modelsikojp

Training evaluationEyad Al-Samman

Kirk patrick's simplistic approachrhimycrajan

Training evaluation

Nancy Raj

Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model.ppt

HarreamPurdiestudent

training and employee developmentzarna pansuriya

Kirkpatrick's modelJohn Samuel Thomas

Kirkpatricks Levels Presentation

Larry Weas

Training & Development ppt

Manoj Kumar

Training And Development

Premnath R

Training evaluation

Mis bah

Training & Development - Role & Skills of Trainer

M R Jhalawad

Measuring ROI of Training

Yodhia Antariksa

Evaluation of training effectiveness

CommLab India – Rapid eLearning Solutions

Employee training & developmentprakashshankar

Training evaluation models

Megha Anilkumar

Four Levels Of Evaluation (Kirkpatrick Model) By Ravinder Tulsiani

Ravinder Tulsiani

Training Needs Analysis

Dr. Peeyush Verma

What's hot (20)

Kirkpatrick's model

Kirkpatrick model

Kirkpatrick's Four Levels Of Evaluation Model

Training evaluation

Kirk patrick's simplistic approach

Training evaluation

Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model.ppt

training and employee development

Kirkpatrick's model

Kirkpatricks Levels Presentation

Training & Development ppt

Training And Development

Training evaluation

Training & Development - Role & Skills of Trainer

Measuring ROI of Training

Evaluation of training effectiveness

Employee training & development

Training evaluation models

Four Levels Of Evaluation (Kirkpatrick Model) By Ravinder Tulsiani

Training Needs Analysis

Viewers also liked

Morrison, Ross & Kemp (MRK) Modelshortele

Evaluation of Training & Development

Megha0000

Evaluation of training

Self-employed

An Introduction To The Dick & Carey Instructional Design Model

Larry Weas

Dick & Carey Instructional Design ModelMartina Henke

Gerlach & Ely IDM

pgmiehl

Process leadershipChance Boudreaux

Portafolio ciro

Diana Said

Digital Process Leadership as a Tool for Action and Social Innovation in an U...

heidi.harman

A New Approach to Experiential Learning: Combining Portfolios with Other Tool...

Seelio

An Approach To ‘Social Centric’ Planning

Mindshare

Summary of leadership presentation (Leadership Primer)

Yeshraj Singh

Corporate Social Responsibility

Neetu Sharma

Dick and carey model

Suzanne Chang

EDUCARNIVAL 2014 at IIT Delhi- Presentation on Curriculum on school leadershi...

Eduexcellence

Ethical leadership youssef gaboune te dx casablanca 2010ethicalleader

Viewers also liked (16)

Morrison, Ross & Kemp (MRK) Model

Evaluation of Training & Development

Evaluation of training

An Introduction To The Dick & Carey Instructional Design Model

Dick & Carey Instructional Design Model

Gerlach & Ely IDM

Process leadership

Portafolio ciro

Digital Process Leadership as a Tool for Action and Social Innovation in an U...

A New Approach to Experiential Learning: Combining Portfolios with Other Tool...

An Approach To ‘Social Centric’ Planning

Summary of leadership presentation (Leadership Primer)

Corporate Social Responsibility

Dick and carey model

EDUCARNIVAL 2014 at IIT Delhi- Presentation on Curriculum on school leadershi...

Ethical leadership youssef gaboune te dx casablanca 2010

Similar to Kirkpatrick Model

EvaluationNelly Kamel

Quick, Cheap and Dirty Training Evaluation

ITCILO

Interviews Module 05 – Live ChatEvaluating Tr.docx

normanibarber20063

Interviews Module 05 – Live Chat Evaluating Training Programs: Kirkpatrick's 4 Levels. The four levels are: Reaction. Learning. Behavior. Results. Level 1: Reaction Kirkpatrick refers to Level 1 as a measure of customer satisfaction. Most of the forms that people fill out at the end of a class or workshop are instruments for measuring Level 1. Here are 8 guidelines that Kirkpatrick recommends to get maximum benefit from reaction sheets: 1. Determine what you want to find out 2. Design a form that will quantify reactions 3. Encourage written comments and suggestions 4. Get a 100 percent immediate response 5. Get honest responses 6. Develop acceptable standards 7. Measure reactions against standards and take the appropriate action 8. Communicate reactions as appropriate. Level 2: Learning Kirkpatrick defines learning as the extent to which participants change attitudes, increase knowledge, and/or increase skill as a result of attending a program. So to measure learning we need to determine the following: What knowledge was learned What skills were developed or improved What attitudes were changed Here are guidelines for evaluating learning: 1. Use a control group if it is practical 2. Evaluate knowledge, skills, and/or attitudes both before and after the program. Use a paper and pencil test to measure knowledge and attitudes and use a performance test to measure skills. 3. Get a 100 percent response 4. Use the results of the evaluation to take appropriate action. Level 3: Behavior Level three can be defined as the extent to which a change in behavior has occurred because someone attended a training program. In order for change in behavior to occur, four conditions are necessary: The person must have a desire to change The person must know what to do and how to do it The person must work in the right climate The person must be rewarded for changing Level 4: Results This involves measuring the final results that occurred because a person attended a training session. This can include increased production, improved work quality, reduced turnover, etc. Here are some guidelines for evaluating results: 1. Use a control group if it is practical 2. Allow time for results to be achieved 3. Measure both before and after the program if it is practical 4. Repeat the measurement at appropriate times 5. Consider cost versus benefit 6. Be satisfied with evidence if proof is not possible The Link Between Performance Management and Employee Engagement. Why does employee engagement matter? Companies with high engagement experience… 16% higher profitability 37% lower absenteeism 2.5 times higher revenues 65% reduction in turnover 18% increase in productivity Three key drivers of engagement Connection: An employee’s connection to their boss, company and job Recognition: Compensation, appreciation and acknowledgment of achievements Performance: Development, feedback and profess.

Training &n Development Studies & Evaluation

ElsaCherian1

Tarining evaluation

Rahul Rajan

PRESCRIPTIVE-EVALUATION-GALLA-JOHNNY-G..pptx

JOHNNYGALLA2

MED07_joycepagkatipunan.pdf

JOYCEPAGKATIPUNAN

Evaluation of training based on Kirkpatrick

Ana Zulianingrum

Kirkpatrick's evaluation model revised 2017

tjcarter

Companion Materials Looking Through the Lens of Rubrics

anniesyso

evaluation of program.pptx

MahwishBukhari3

purpose of sharing "evaluation of program/ learner" is to develop better understanding about evaluation program for students who are striving hard to get the easy and useful material that can help them to achieve better result in their academics. In this presentation, we have done our best to fulfil the need of students and make it easy to understand for students. BSN students can specifically get help form this ppt as it is include in their curriculum

Creating Assessments

Christina Sax

Kirkpatricks Foul Levels Evaluation.pptx

JohnnyGGalla

Factors in constructing evaluative instruments

Catherine Matias

Kirpatrick model of evaluation

Sajan Ks

Classroom assessment powerpoint ch.2 and 3Etowah High School

Week 7 presentationRhonda Varner Gregory

Sales White Paper: Evaluating Sales Training Programs

Altify