Plus, an introduction to the classical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos. This is a quick introduction; later slideshows will go into detail. Look in each Module for a Powerpoint reviewing the They Say I Say Chapters!
This presentation was used in an English 101 ("Introductory Writing") class in Fall 2008 at Washington State University. The topics for the day were summary, use of quotes and citations, using one's own voice, and otherwise working with sources to "enter the conversation" in order to continue it. Slides refer to some specific assignments and readings, but some of the content is general enough to be useful.
This presentation was used in an English 101 ("Introductory Writing") class in Fall 2008 at Washington State University. The topics for the day were summary, use of quotes and citations, using one's own voice, and otherwise working with sources to "enter the conversation" in order to continue it. Slides refer to some specific assignments and readings, but some of the content is general enough to be useful.
Strategies for Teaching Argumentation: Reasoning TreeJill Pavich
Are your students writing an argumentative paper? The Reasoning Tree activity is a great way to give visual value to the concept of building a line of reasoning. In this case, we're growing an argument, and the visual images will remain in the minds of your writers all year! An excellent 'check-yo-self' activity for young writers!
Strategies for Teaching Argumentation: Reasoning TreeJill Pavich
Are your students writing an argumentative paper? The Reasoning Tree activity is a great way to give visual value to the concept of building a line of reasoning. In this case, we're growing an argument, and the visual images will remain in the minds of your writers all year! An excellent 'check-yo-self' activity for young writers!
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docxmigdalialyle
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of informal fallacy arguments. This assignment allows you to examine common fallacies in everyday reasoning.
Using the types of arguments listed in the textbook chapter “Flimsy Structures,” respond to the following:
Draft two original fallacies. Do not identify the fallacies, allow your peers to determine what fallacy your example represents.
Next, using the Internet, respond to the following:
Research a third informal fallacy not already covered in the text.
Identify and define the fallacy. For example, appeal to tradition, false dichotomy, etc.
Provide a citation for your source.
Construct an original fallacy argument of that type.
Support your statements with examples and scholarly references.
Write your initial response in 1–2 paragraphs. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
By
Sunday, October 7, 2012
, post your response to the appropriate
Discussion Area
. Through
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
, review and comment on at least two peers’ responses. Identify their fallacies and suggest ways in which they can refine their arguments.
Grading Criteria and Rubric
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Initial Discussion Response
16
Discussion Participation
16
Writing Craftsmanship and Ethical Scholarship
8
Total:
40
CHAPTER 12
Flimsy Structures
This chapter could have been titled “
Un
warranted Inferences.” The following are certain infamous reasons given to support arguments—infamous because they mimic real support. There are two basic replies to these inferences: “So what?” or “What else?”
Abusing arguments may be among the world’s older professions. Proper names for many types of abuse are in Latin. I’ll deal only with the seven deadliest: inconsistency,
ad hominem
attacks, appeal to pity, begging the questions,
post hoc ergo propter hoc
, appeal (only) to the many, and straw man.
INCONSISTENCY
Two main ways of being inconsistent come to mind:
1.
Offering reasons that are contradictory
. For example, arguing that most people who strive for success do so out of hunger for love and admiration they didn’t get when growing up; and in the same book arguing that most people strive for success because they can afford to take the risk of failure, having been given a lot of encouragement and attention as children. Since encouragement and attention are tantamount to love and admiration, this argument is foundering on inconsistency unless the arguer makes a careful distinction between the pairs of terms
love-admiration
and
encouragement-attention
to explain this disparity.
2.
Offering reasons that contradict the conclusion
. For example, we should conserve on fuel because many of the elderly poor are dying from lack of heat in the winter. Given that reason, the conclusion would appear to be the opposite: that we should expend more fuel, at least on the elderly poor (unless some fiend is advocating killing off the elderly poor).
Enjoy Being on the Lookout
You can .
English Composition I Presentation on Fake News
I have collaborated for over a year with an English professor colleague on his composition classes which spend the whole semester researching and writing about fake news. This is the presentation that I used for their library instruction.
Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra1. What does it mean when s.docxmoirarandell
Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra
1. What does it mean when something grows or decays exponentially? How is that different then rising or falling linearly?
2. Give an example of a real life application of exponential growth or decay. Include the link to a website to show this.
Please answer as two different posts. You need three posts for full credit.
When you reply to others in the class, your replies should contain original thought and/or a follow up question.
Classical Argument
Persuasion and ArgumentPersuasion is the process of drawing conclusions and getting others to accept them and act upon them.Argumentation is the process of drawing conclusions after looking at both sides of an issue and getting others to accept one side based upon logic and careful exploration of facts.
Rhetoric and AudienceRhetoric is the “art of speaking or writing effectively”It is a set of skills used in college and in the business world Effective communication is an important skill in the work forceEffective communication gets our point across without embarrassment for ourselves or others. Effective communication understands what the audience does and does not know about the topic.
Aristotle’s Appeals: Ethos, Logos, and PathosAristotle was a student of Plato. Later, he was a teacher for Alexander the Great. He identified three appeals that can be used to persuade others. Ethos=ethics. Logos=logic. Pathos=emotion
Ethos=Ethics, CredibilityAs a writer, you will establish your credibility through careful research. Articles from experts in the field of study will help you build your ethos in the paper. An advertisement using ethos would be a McDonald’s commercial stating the number of years in business (hence they know how to make a decent hamburger). A car dealership might also state how long they have been at the same location. Or, the dealership might make sure you know“ 2013 Time Dealer of the year award nominee for being among the nation’s most successful auto dealers who also demonstrate a long-standing commitment to community service” (Fuson Automotive).
Logos=LogicWhen using logos in an argument, we provide facts, statistics, evidence, and reason. An automobile commercial stating the vehicle gets x mpg is proving a logos appeal. When gas prices climb, auto makers want to highlight how many miles per gallon the car can travel. Therefore, a car advertised as getting 40 mpg would appeal to a consumer who travels a distance of 40 miles to and from work. If the reader finds the evidence given “logical” it will appeal to the reader.
Pathos=EmotionA pathos appeal will tap into human emotions. Some commercials are deliberately funny and are geared to draw us to the restaurant or product being advertised. From about mid-January until February 14, TV ads focus on how we should tell our “significant” other “I love you.” Commercials such as the “Sandals Resort” plays to adults who want a romantic get-away. We are frequently told ...
Definition of Ethos and How to Use it1. Trustworthiness Does y.docxrandyburney60861
Definition of Ethos and How to Use it
1. Trustworthiness Does your audience believe you are a good person who can be trusted to tell the truth?
2. Similarity Does the writer try to get the reader to identify with him or her? This can be done through language
3. Authority Does the writer have formal or informal authority? Does the writer try to relate to the reader?
4. Reputation What are the expertise the writer uses? How many does he use? What are their areas of authority?
Logos: Logical reasoning, which has two bases:
Deductive reasoning, and
Inductive reasoning
Deductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning generally start with one or more premises, and then comes to a conclusion from them. Premises can be facts, claims, evidence, or a previously proven conclusion. The key is that in a deductive argument, if the writer’s premises are true, then the conclusion must be true.
1. Education determines one’s class base.
2. One’s class base will shape one’s employment.
3. Therefore, education will determine one’s employment.
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is similar in that it consists of premises, which lead to a conclusion. The difference is that the conclusion is not guaranteed to be true — we can only state it with some degree of confidence.
For example, consider the following inductive argument:
5. All Six Minutes articles you have read in the past were insightful. (premise)
6. This is a Six Minutes article. (premise)
Therefore, this article is insightful. (conclusion)
How to Identify Logos
Make it Understandable: Does the writer make the argument understandable? What tools does he or she use to do this?
Make it Logical: Does the arguments make sense? Or does the writer require the reader to make an extreme leap of faith? How easy is it for the writer to make a connection to the argument?
Make it Real: Does the writer make the argument real? Is the argument concrete or abstract?
The language plain language: Does the writer use technical jargon or is a portion of language used for a specific reader that isn’t familiar with the reader?
Does the writer use short words and phrases over long and convoluted counterparts?
The language is explicit: Does the writer make his or her argument plain? What techniques does he or she use to establish explicit argument?
The writer uses a couple premises, to establish his or her position? Are they relatable? Do they show relationship between them? “And these five advantages — capital costs, scheduling, inventory control, marketing, and employee satisfaction — together make this a winning proposal.”
Trace sequences or processes in order.
Does the writer jump around to different places or is there an order to his or her steps that create clarity or confusion for the reader?
Use comparisons, analogies, and metaphors.
Does the writer introduce new concepts, with an appropriate analogy which helps the audience understand the new concept in terms of how they already understand the old one?.
Brainstorming, Thesis Statement, Outline, First Draft and Final draft. This slide show takes you through the Btoff steps and how to compose a 5 paragraph academic essay.
1000+ word essay MLA styleTopic Judging others is human nature..docxAlyciaGold776
1000+ word essay MLA style
Topic
: Judging others is human nature. Some of us may practice fighting the urge to be judgmental more than others, but it is a very active battle. What lessons can you argue the characters from “ A Good Man Is Hard To Find by Flannery Oconnor” and “Young Goodman Brown by Nathaniel Hawthorne” teach readers regarding the dangers of being judgmental?
Please use these strategy questions as the professor is looking for them to be addressed in the writing.
Do you have a lead-in to “hook” your reader? (an example, anecdote, scenario, startling statistic, or provocative question.)
How much background is required to properly acquaint readers with your issue?
Will your claim be placed early (introduction) or delayed (conclusion) in your paper?
What is your supporting evidence?
Have you located authoritative (expert) sources that add credibility to your argument?
Have you considered addressing opposing viewpoints?
Are you willing to make some concessions (compromises) toward opposing sides?
What type of tone (serious, comical, sarcastic, inquisitive) best relates your message to reach your audience?
One written, have you maintained a third person voice? (no “I” or “you” statements)
How will you conclude in a meaningful way? (call your readers to take action, explain why the topic has a global importance, or offer a common ground compromise that benefits all sides?)
I wanted to make the instructions clear so I am not penalized when it comes to grading.
All paragraphs should have a topic sentence and supporting sentences explaining one idea and not multiple ideas.
Things I got hit on, on past papers on here.
Intro
Opposition
Supporting argument
Conclusion
Works cited page
looking for an A+
also have a 2000 word research paper coming up soon that i'm willinng to pay good for will be posting soon
.
What have we learned so farBenjamin Wallace, The Price of Ha.docxalanfhall8953
What have we learned so far?
Benjamin Wallace, “The Price of Happiness”: How does the price of something affect your level of happiness? Conflicting, contradictory. You seem to usually enjoy it more if you spend more money on it.
Michael Norton, “How to Buy Happiness”: Money can buy you happiness, but not when you spend it on yourself, but when you spend it on others.
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, “Flow, The Secret to Happiness”: Money is not really a motivation in people and it’s not a cause for happiness. A state where you’re in the zone, you are working for the sake of working. The work itself is motivating. Your work is something that makes you happy. There’s the diagram of challenging/skills.
Barry Schwartz, “The Paradox of Choice”: Barry does say choice is good, but highlights the numerous bad implications of choice. Choice can make you not satisfied because you’ll think you made the wrong choice, regret. Low expectations really help you make a choice.
Dan Gilbert, “The Surprising Science of Happiness”:
Nancy Etcoff, “The Science of Happiness”: Happiness is a lot more complicated than we thought it was 50 years ago. She brings up lots of different studies on happiness to “update” the audience on happiness. Babies are hardwired to detect pleasure and happiness. People are hardwired to experience unhappiness and discomfort more than happiness. Unhappiness is often medicated.
Malcolm Gladwell, “Choice, Happiness, and Spaghetti Sauce”: He says we need people to help us figure out exactly what we want so they can market something for us. Howard “democratized” food and beverages, this is what expanding choice did.
Sunstein, C.R., “What You Can Learn from the New Science of Smarter Spending”:
Chan, M., “Here’s How Winning the Lottery Makes You Miserable”:
Begley, S., “Happiness: Enough Already”: Sadness and depression and anxiety are okay. They can lead to productivity.
Brooks, D., “What Suffering Does”: He lists benefits to suffering, as opposed to just being happy.
Essay 1: Finding Common Ground
Quality Criteria
No/Limited Proficiency (1)
Minimal Proficiency (2)
Proficiency (3)
High Proficiency (4)
An informative introduction to the issue and opposing positions
The issue(s) at hand are not explained. Thesis is missing. Reader cannot determine thesis and purpose or thesis has no relation to the writing task.
The issue(s) and opposing positions are not well-developed. Thesis may be obvious or unimaginative. Thesis and topic are somewhat vague or only loosely related to the writing task.
The issue(s) and opposing positions are competently developed, but still has some weaknesses. Thesis is somewhat original. Thesis and purpose are fairly clear and match the writing task.
Develops fresh insight. Substantial, logical, and concrete developments of issue and opposing positions. Details are germane, original, and convincingly interpreted. Thesis is clear and specific.
A well-developed, probing analysis of the two articles
Offers simplistic, un.
Presentation created for COMM 107 - Oral Communication: Principles and Practice
University of Maryland
Source: Communication: A Social and Career Focus by Berko, Wolvin & Wolvin
Presentation created for COMM 107 - Oral Communication: Principles and Practice
University of Maryland
Source: Communication: A Social and Career Focus by Berko, Wolvin & Wolvin
Similar to Introduction to They Say/I Say: Review (20)
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
2. Whenever we read or write, we’re involved with more than
ourselves. It’s a three-way!
Reader/Audience
Message/Purpose
Author/Speaker
Purpose: convince,
persuade, inform,
explore, decide,
consider…what?
Context,
occasion
3. The ”templates” in They Say/I Say remind you of the
triangle
Starting with what others are saying is the easiest way
in: it forces you to justify why YOU are here, if others got
there first—which they always do, when you are writing.
4. Your ideas are ALWAYS in response to someone else’s—the
conversation started before you were born
“We don’t make arguments without being provoked”
5. You have three options, when piping in:
Responding directly to someone else
Offering something “new”
Not making any sense at all
Even if you’re incoherent, it’s because no one can connect
what you’re saying to a previous reference. The reference
is still invoked, in other words.
In other words, even if you’re spouting nonsense you are
ALWAYS piping in. You might as well practice doing it
well.
6. Pay attention to author’ explanations for templates.
As they note, when you are really writing, you need to go past
“formulas” in order to
question assumptions
develop strong claims
offer supporting reasons and evidence
consider opposing arguments
say why it matters
Remember these goals: we will review them in the chapters to
follow
7. the “they” can be:
a published author
your mom
That dude at the bus stop who has an opinion about Donald
Trump
someone who has opinions that a general audience at least
recognizes
an implied “they” that the reader needs to do work to infer
8. A) You can disagree (the most obvious way to respond) but
also,
B) You can agree (template on p 8)
C)and even better, and this turns out to be often the most
interesting and useful and supportable position, you can do
both (this is the “yes, but” position). templates on page 9.
9. What is the authors’ response to that critique?
Why isn’t it plagiarism?
What is plagiarism?
Review pages 10-13 for an explanation
11. Appeals that establish character and
credibility
FOR A SPECIFIC AUDIENCE:
credibility is not the same for all audiences:
one has to be able to correctly “call” an
audience, correctly establish what will be
credible (believable) for THAT audience, on
THAT occasion, for THAT purpose.
12. One of the first things you need to do as a
writer is establish your ethos:
establishing trustworthiness and credibility
with your particular audience
This involves: respecting your particular
reader; conceding to objections, adopting the
appropriate tone for your audience
claiming authority
establishing credentials (experience with the
thing being discussed, etc.)
coming clean about motives: admitting your
vested interest
13. Pathos: appeal to emotion/producing affective
response
Arguments that rely on emotion or are based
on emotion and feeling (feeling includes being
moved to pity, sorry, joy, but also anger, rage)
[Humor counts as pathos]
Even an apathetic response counts as pathos
(“I am unmoved” or “I couldn’t care less” or
“meh” still counts as an affective response)
14. The most obvious way to think about appeals to
logos is that they are arguments based on logic,
reason, facts and data.
But while we think logic is always going to help us.
that’s not always the case. The significance of facts
needs to be explained, with reason, for them to have
any meaning.
15. The best time and place to make the argument:
“seizing” the opportunity
Using “appropriate” language: but what does that
mean? Who is your audience? What do they want to
hear? What will turn them off? What will please
them, at the time? These are the questions you ask
when thinking about what opportunity to seize.