This document provides an overview of research data management (RDM) at the University of Leeds. It defines research data and discusses best practices for managing data during an active project and for long-term archiving after a project is complete. The benefits of proper RDM include avoiding data loss, increasing efficiency, supporting research integrity and enabling collaboration. Funders also require data management plans and data sharing. The University of Leeds Library provides support and resources for RDM and recommends repositories for archiving research data.
What support is being provided to researchers? A view from a universityUoLResearchSupport
Short presentation on Friday 26th December as part of the FAIRsFAIR workshop: Advancing the skills agenda for reproducibility, open and FAIR. A virtual National Roadshow from FAIRsFAIR
"I'm not a scientist, I don't have any research data": Managing arts and humanities data. Presented at the Research Data Network workshop, St Andrews, 30 Nov 2016
What support is being provided to researchers? A view from a universityUoLResearchSupport
Short presentation on Friday 26th December as part of the FAIRsFAIR workshop: Advancing the skills agenda for reproducibility, open and FAIR. A virtual National Roadshow from FAIRsFAIR
"I'm not a scientist, I don't have any research data": Managing arts and humanities data. Presented at the Research Data Network workshop, St Andrews, 30 Nov 2016
Crossing Borders: International Interoperability at the ADSariadnenetwork
Presentation by Michael Charno,
ADS ( Archaeology Data Service)
Full-day session on archaeological infrastructures and services at the 18th Cultural Heritage and New Technologies (CHNT) conference
Vienna, Austria
11th -13th November 2013
What I wish I’d known at the start! What I wish I’d known at the start! Lessons learned the hard way when setting up RDM services;
Stephen Grace, London South Bank University, Sarah Jones, DCC; Research Data Network
Archaeological Training in an Open Access World: Lessons from the REWARD Proj...ariadnenetwork
Presentation by Anastasia Sakellariadi and Brian Hole (UCL Institute of Archaeology & Ubiquity Press)
EAA 2014 session: Open Access and Open Data in Archaeology
Istanbul, Turkey
13 September 2013
Natalie Harrower - DRI, RDA and Irelanddri_ireland
From "A National Approach to Open Research Data in Ireland", a workshop held on 8 September 2017 in National Library of Ireland, organised by The National Library of Ireland, the Digital Repository of Ireland, the Research Data Alliance and Open Research Ireland.
Implementing figshare, research data networkJisc RDM
Implementing figshare and engaging researchers,
Research data network, September 2016, Georgina Parsons, Cranfield University and Megan Hardeman, figshare.
**Researcher engagement resources: a demonstration**
*Rosie Higman, University of Cambridge/Manchester, Hardy Schwamm, Lancaster University*
Research Data Network
Introduction to SUNCAT
Background to the redevelopment of the service
Key enhancements of the new interface
Contributing to SUNCAT
How SUNCAT can help you and your users
Demo of the new service
Future plans
Feedback and questions
Presented by Zena Mulligan at the Interlend 2014 Conference, 23-24 June 2014, Carlton Highland Hotel,
Edinburgh.
This presentation was provided by Scott Warren and Anne Rauh of Syracuse University during the NISO virtual conference, Research Information Systems: The Connections Enabling Collaboration, held on August 16, 2017.
Building data networks: exploring trust and interoperability between authoris...Repository Fringe
Building data networks: exploring trust and interoperability between authoris, repositories and journals. Varsha Khodiyar , Scientific Data; Neil Chue Hong, Journal of Open Research Software; Rachael Kotarski, DataCite, Peter McQuilton, BioSharing; Reza Salek, Metabolights. At Repository Fringe 2015
Presentation made at the 'Towards linked science - Open Data and DataCite Esrtonia seminar as part of the Estonian Open Access Week at University of Tartu
This presentation was provided by Jan Fransen of the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities during the NISO virtual conference, Research Information Systems: The Connections Enabling Collaboration, held on August 16, 2017.
Crossing Borders: International Interoperability at the ADSariadnenetwork
Presentation by Michael Charno,
ADS ( Archaeology Data Service)
Full-day session on archaeological infrastructures and services at the 18th Cultural Heritage and New Technologies (CHNT) conference
Vienna, Austria
11th -13th November 2013
What I wish I’d known at the start! What I wish I’d known at the start! Lessons learned the hard way when setting up RDM services;
Stephen Grace, London South Bank University, Sarah Jones, DCC; Research Data Network
Archaeological Training in an Open Access World: Lessons from the REWARD Proj...ariadnenetwork
Presentation by Anastasia Sakellariadi and Brian Hole (UCL Institute of Archaeology & Ubiquity Press)
EAA 2014 session: Open Access and Open Data in Archaeology
Istanbul, Turkey
13 September 2013
Natalie Harrower - DRI, RDA and Irelanddri_ireland
From "A National Approach to Open Research Data in Ireland", a workshop held on 8 September 2017 in National Library of Ireland, organised by The National Library of Ireland, the Digital Repository of Ireland, the Research Data Alliance and Open Research Ireland.
Implementing figshare, research data networkJisc RDM
Implementing figshare and engaging researchers,
Research data network, September 2016, Georgina Parsons, Cranfield University and Megan Hardeman, figshare.
**Researcher engagement resources: a demonstration**
*Rosie Higman, University of Cambridge/Manchester, Hardy Schwamm, Lancaster University*
Research Data Network
Introduction to SUNCAT
Background to the redevelopment of the service
Key enhancements of the new interface
Contributing to SUNCAT
How SUNCAT can help you and your users
Demo of the new service
Future plans
Feedback and questions
Presented by Zena Mulligan at the Interlend 2014 Conference, 23-24 June 2014, Carlton Highland Hotel,
Edinburgh.
This presentation was provided by Scott Warren and Anne Rauh of Syracuse University during the NISO virtual conference, Research Information Systems: The Connections Enabling Collaboration, held on August 16, 2017.
Building data networks: exploring trust and interoperability between authoris...Repository Fringe
Building data networks: exploring trust and interoperability between authoris, repositories and journals. Varsha Khodiyar , Scientific Data; Neil Chue Hong, Journal of Open Research Software; Rachael Kotarski, DataCite, Peter McQuilton, BioSharing; Reza Salek, Metabolights. At Repository Fringe 2015
Presentation made at the 'Towards linked science - Open Data and DataCite Esrtonia seminar as part of the Estonian Open Access Week at University of Tartu
This presentation was provided by Jan Fransen of the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities during the NISO virtual conference, Research Information Systems: The Connections Enabling Collaboration, held on August 16, 2017.
Executing a Flawless Content Strategy | Chris Bennett | SMX Advanced 201497th Floor
Execute a flawless content strategy by getting more mileage out of your existing efforts. Don't think harder, think smarter. Use what you are already doing and repurpose or upcycle to hit all social sites in their native content medium. Create interactive marketing apps to disrupt and engage with your audience. Pull them away from the day to day stream of nonsense with your well thought out interactive content.
Your website's users want to get stuff done, and you probably aren't making it easy for them. When users encounter forms with unnecessary steps, content that requires too many clicks to access, or things that just don't make sense, they often give up. In this talk, you’ll see some practical examples of sites that do a good job of making interactions and content easy to follow and understand, and you'll learn how to help your users get to where they want to be without annoying them on the way there.
Presented in 2016 at ConFoo.
Knowing the answers may help kids in school, but knowing how to question will help them in life. Here are 5 ways to make us ALL better questioners. From the author of A MORE BEAUTIFUL QUESTION.
Does a company really need a head office? The new organizational structure of the 21st century is the network, not the hierarchy. And the focus of management should be on leadership, not governance. But how can you organize this?
Happy Melly is a company built as a network of entities, connected through a Constitution, with regular gatherings on Skype. The network is led by a CEO who can be voted out any time. The only way for him to stay on top is to keep everyone’s trust. Every day.
5 Steps to Creating a Simple Social Media PlanLaura Click
Creating a social media plan doesn’t have to be a herculean effort. Asking some simple questions can help you build a basic social media plan that will set you up for success.
Can it really be that simple?
Yes, I believe it can. And, I’ll show you how it works.
All it takes is five simple steps to get your social media efforts started off on the right foot.
The famous educational philosopher, John Dewey, stated “We do not learn from experience, we learn from reflecting on experience.’ Maker education involves hands-on and experiential activities. Learning can occur through the act of making but having learners reflect on their making experiences increases the likelihood of learning. It is not left to chance.
One of the best books I have read this year is Brain Rules: 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School. The applications for presentation are many. This is a book review of sorts, though I do not highlight all aspects of the book. I focus on the three rules that relate most directly, though all the rules have lessons. Just a fantastic book.
17 Ways to Design a Presentation People Want to ViewJim MacLeod
Tired of boring PowerPoint presentations? Me too. Here are 17 tips to help you create a presentation that not only engages the audience, but forces them to remember what you want them to remember.
Stuart Macdonald steps through the process of creating a robust data management plan for researchers. Presented at the European Association for Health Information and Libraries (EAHIL) 2015 workshop, Edinburgh, 11 June 2015.
Big Data Europe: SC6 Workshop 3: The European Research Data Landscape: Opport...BigData_Europe
Slides of the keynote at the 3rd Big Data Europe SC6 Workshop co-located at SEMANTiCS2018 in Amsterdam (NL) on: The European Research Data Landscape: Opportunities for CESSDA by Peter Doorn, Director DANS, Chair, Science Europe W.G. on Research Data. Chair, CESSDA ERIC General Assembly
The basics of Research Data Management. Session 1.1 of the RDMRose v3 materials.
The JISC funded RDMRose project (June 2012-May 2013) was a collaboration between the libraries of the University of Leeds, Sheffield and York, with the Information School at Sheffield to provide an Open Educational Resource for information professionals on Research Data Management. The materials were revised between November 2014 and February 2015 for the consortium of North West Academic Libraries (NoWAL).
http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/is/research/projects/rdmrose
Supporting Libraries in Leading the Way in Research Data ManagementMarieke Guy
Marieke Guy, Institutional Support Officer, Digital Curation Centre, UKOLN, University of Bath, UK presents on Supporting Libraries in Leading the Way in Research Data Management at Online Information, London 20th -21st November 2012
dkNET Office Hours - "Are You Ready for 2023? New NIH Data Management and Sha...dkNET
For all proposals submitted on/after January 25 2023, NIH will require the sharing of data from all NIH funded studies. Do you have appropriate data management practices and sharing plans in place to meet these requirements? Have questions or need some help? Join the dkNET office hours to learn about NIH’s policy (NOT-OD-21-013) and resources (https://dknet.org/rin/research-data-management) that could help.
Upcoming Webinars Schedule: https://dknet.org/about/webinar
The academic research data lifecycle. Session 1.4 of the RDMRose v3 materials.
The JISC funded RDMRose project (June 2012-May 2013) was a collaboration between the libraries of the University of Leeds, Sheffield and York, with the Information School at Sheffield to provide an Open Educational Resource for information professionals on Research Data Management. The materials were revised between November 2014 and February 2015 for the consortium of North West Academic Libraries (NoWAL).
http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/is/research/projects/rdmrose
dkNET Office Hours: NIH Data Management and Sharing Mandate 05/03/2024dkNET
Presenter: Jeffrey Grethe, PhD, Principal Investigator of NIDDK Information Network (dkNET), Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California San Diego
For all proposals submitted on/after January 25 2023, NIH requires the sharing of data from all NIH funded studies. Do you have appropriate data management practices and sharing plans in place to meet these requirements? Have questions or need some help? Join the dkNET office hours to learn about NIH’s policy (NOT-OD-21-013) and resources that could help.
*Previous Office Hours Slides and Recording: https://dknet.org/rin/research-data-management
Upcoming Webinars Schedule: https://dknet.org/about/webinar
Reflections on Open Educational Practice Nick Sheppard
Slides from a presentation by Antonio Martínez-Arboleda on 18 January 2022: A global challenge: digital and open education for inclusive societies
Antonio Martínez-Arboleda is Academic Lead for Open Educational Practice and Co-Director of the Centre for Research in Digital Education of the University of Leeds. Antonio has been a champion and practitioner of open education since 2009, initially as part of the Humbox team and co-researcher of the JISC funded project OpenLIVES on Digitised Life Stories. His scholarship focuses on the areas of OER (Open Educational Resources) and Critical Digital Pedagogies.
Sustainable support for OER at the University of EdinburghNick Sheppard
Slides from a presentation by Lorna Campbell on 18 January 2022: A global challenge: digital and open education for inclusive societies
Lorna is a learning technology service manager at the University of Edinburgh’s Open Educational Resources (OER) Service. She is also a Trustee of Wikimedia UK and the Association for Learning Technology and has a longstanding personal commitment to supporting open knowledge and education. Her blog, Open World (http://lornamcampbell.org), features personal reflections on all aspects of open education, and she is an active member of the #femedtech network. You can find Lorna on twitter at @lornamcampbell.
Contributing to the global commons: Repositories and WikimediaNick Sheppard
There is huge potential for universities and their libraries to leverage Wikimedia in order to expose research outputs and collections. Wikimedia comprises sixteen projects in total, including Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata. At the University of Leeds, the Research Data Management Service have successfully run a project that focuses on linking research data with the Wikimedia suite of tools via a series of ‘editathons’, in order to increase the visibility of research data and enable reuse on Wikipedia and elsewhere. The project - "Manage it locally to share it globally: RDM and Wikimedia Commons" - was the winning submission to a competition launched in May 2018 and sponsored by SPARC Europe, Jisc and the University of Cambridge, called the "Data Management Engagement Award", which aimed to address cultural challenges involved in promoting effective research data practices.
The project has served as a springboard to further explore Wikimedia strategically, both at the University of Leeds and across the White Rose Consortium. For example we are collaborating on a new project looking at Wikipedia citations of research from York, Sheffield and Leeds, and the proportion of these that are open access. The long term goal might be to establish a "Wikimedian in Residence" across the consortium. In this talk, we will present the project's outputs - including a toolkit that will enable other institutions to apply the same methodology. In addition we will explore the potential of Wikidata to link up repositories and other data silos in a manner that enables reuse and increases impact.
Manage it locally to share it globally: RDM and Wikimedia CommonsNick Sheppard
Slides for Internet Librarian International 2018 about the Data Management Engagement Award, a first-ever competition launched to elicit new and imaginative ideas for engaging researchers in the practices of good Research Data Management (RDM) - http://www.rdmengagementaward.org/
Using social media and quantitative metrics to engage the research communityNick Sheppard
The modern university Library comprises repositories, publishing platforms and social media and is central to the dissemination mission of the University. Recent progress towards ‘Open Access’ has enabled research to be more effectively disseminated via the internet and aggregated into an Institutional Repository, empowering institutions to disseminate their own research and monitor associated metrics. A repository is also an ideal home for grey literature and research data, where IPR is more likely to be retained by universities which are increasingly minting DOIs for this type of content, ensuring persistence and enabling (alternative) metrics. This case study will present a Library led social media initiative at the University of Leeds examining local challenges and presenting usage data from Altmetric.com, Twitter Analytics and IRUS-UK.
The University of Leeds is a research intensive Russell Group University with a well-developed ecosystem of research oriented Twitter accounts. These include both University branded accounts overseen by schools, faculties or research groups as well as a huge number of ‘personal’ accounts operated by individual staff or students. In 2012 an account focussed on research data was set up in the Library as part of the Roadmap project but was used only sporadically before being rebranded in 2017 and used more actively to engage with the research community, to promote both OA research papers and datasets.
Themes and challenges include quantitative metrics, institutional and departmental oversight of social media, operational implications and sustainability.
Has anyone seen my data? Incentivising #opendata sharing with altmetricsNick Sheppard
As an important component of the scholarly record, research data, software and code are increasingly managed as research outputs in their own right, though are not typically subject to peer review.
In line with the broader ‘open research’ movement there is a growing impetus for datasets, software and code to be curated in repositories, openly available wherever possible subject to relevant legal and ethical constraints.
Data repositories such as Figshare, Dryad and Zenodo routinely allocate DOIs for deposited data while many universities in the UK also allocate and mint DOIs in their nascent institutionally based data repositories through Datacite which means they will be automatically tracked by altmetric.com in the same way as journal articles.
While the repository infrastructure continues to develop and there are pockets of best practice, data sharing and reuse is not yet fully established across UK HE. Reward mechanisms are immature and data citation, for example, is limited and not easy to track. Clarivate Analytics’ Data Citation Index coverage of UK based repositories is still relatively low and, as a subscription based product, is not widely accessible. COUNTER compliant downloads can be derived from IRUSdata-UK (beta) which currently tracks 27 UK based institutional data repositories.
Altmetrics therefore offers a low barrier method to track engagement with datasets and, in lieu of a more formal process, might be regarded as a type of informal peer review. We have undertaken a preliminary analysis of repositories that participate in IRUSdata-UK (beta) using it as a source of DOIs to run against the altmetric.com API to discover to what extent research data, software and code is being shared.
This talk will present these preliminary results and explore how and why datasets are being shared across the various platforms tracked by altmetric.com and potential barriers. It will consider how data repository managers can encourage and facilitate data sharing through social media networks, blogs and “data journalism” and will draw on the Research Data Management (RDM) Engagement Award at the University of Leeds which is exploring linking RDM with the Open Science movement via the Wikimedia suite of tools. What does the altmetric data currently tell us about how research data is being linked to this global platform
Slides from a webinar for the Royal Society of Chemistry on 24th February 2016.
See the URI below to access the full report from the RSC survey "The role of libraries in open access publishing":
http://www.rsc.org/campaigns/m/lc/lc16013/open-access/
We often hear that we are in a transitional phase of open access publishing, but it is not always clear how we will reach a fully open access environment, what that will look like and what it means for scholarly research. This webinar will draw insights from a librarian survey we ran in 2015, discussing areas where librarians feel a lack of confidence and presenting technical and policy developments.
Register to gain a deeper understanding of:
• The historical and political context of scholarly publishing
• Funder and other policy requirements for Open Access (e.g. HEFCE and RCUK in the UK, Horizon2020 in Europe and NIH is the USA)
• Developing models of OA including “Gold”, “Green” and “hybrid”
• Jisc support services for OA
• Social media and OA – e.g. “Altmetrics” (alternative metrics) as potential indicators of impact beyond the traditional readership of scholarly material
Leveraging a Library CMS and Social Media to promote #openaccess (OA) to inst...Nick Sheppard
The confluence of various technologies and Open Access (OA) initiatives make it easy to share research outputs via social media and assess the reach and impact of dissemination. The Library at Leeds Beckett utilises LibGuides as our CMS and supports the institutional research management infrastructure comprising Symplectic Elements and EPrints, and we have developed a dedicated series of LibGuides around selected themes comprising a range of relevant information and including institutional research outputs. For World Diabetes Day, for example, we curated a collection of research outputs and utilised the Elements API to display a date ordered list of citations including, where available, links to author versions, self-archived and openly accessible in EPrints alongside an embedded Twitter feed from @WDD, the Official Twitter account of the campaign from the International Diabetes Federation. The page was disseminated via Twitter from accounts operated by the Library, @BeckettLibrary and @BeckettResearch, including targeted tweets to @WDD and individual academics. With over 4,500 and 1,500 followers respectively these accounts are well subscribed and received several "retweets". The guide, whilst highlighting and strengthening the role of the library as a tool for researchers, was also an advocacy tool to engage academics in OA. This paper will explore the context and technology of this initiative and present data from Twitter analytics and so called "altmetrics" as a means of visualising how research is shared and disseminated online and which are potential indicators of impact beyond the traditional readership of scholarly material, especially in conjunction with OA.
Philosophical Transactions to the Finch report: the events that have defined ...Nick Sheppard
Throughout history the creation and dissemination of knowledge has been influenced by innumerable ‘events’, cultural, technological and political in nature; from the invention of Cuneiform to the rise and fall of Classical civilizations and cultural incubation by the Catholic Church through the European Dark Ages to the Enlightenment. The invention of the printing press is obviously pivotal and in 1665 Henry Oldenburg inaugurated the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Phil Trans), utilising print technology to establish the principles of scientific priority and peer review that have defined scientific discourse ever since.
In the 20th Century scholarly publishing became exploited by commercial academic publishers and, as journal prices began to outstrip inflation, ultimately resulted in the “serials crisis” of the 1970s. These unsustainable price rises coincided with emergence of the internet and in 1990 Stevan Harnad introduced Psycoloquy, the first peer-reviewed online scientific journal which paved the way for free academic publishing on the web after 1993. In spite of this, and with the World Wide Web over 2 decades old, the traditional subscription model persists, dominated by multinational corporations that generate huge profits and restrict access to scholarly material.
The Open Access movement is a worldwide effort to make scholarly work available online to everyone regardless of their ability to pay for access and in 2011 David Willetts set up a Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, chaired by Dame Janet Finch and publishing the so called “Finch report” in 2012. The HEFCE policy on OA that comes into effect in 2016 perhaps represents the most recent cultural and political event in this space.
This paper will explore the events that continue to influence academic dissemination and examine how Universities and academics themselves, particularly early career researchers, can utilise modern technology to be part of their own open knowledge event.
Extending and measuring the reach and impact of research output: #openaccess,...Nick Sheppard
Research can be easily disseminated online amongst communities of researchers and interested lay people, via social media for example, and it is clearly beneficial if that research is freely accessible on the open web rather than restricted by subscription access. Evidence suggests that OA can increase traditional citations and, increasingly, developments in alternative or “altmetrics” are enabling online social activity around research to be recorded and measured. This session will explore initiatives in this are at Leeds Beckett in the context of the new HEFCE requirements for OA that come into effect in 2016.
Significant developments in OA, driven by HEFCE’s “Policy for open access in the post-2014 Research Excellence Framework” state that authors’ final peer-reviewed manuscripts must be deposited in a repository on acceptance for publication i.e. “green” OA. In many ways the policy is a response to the Finch report and RCUK policy which emphasise “gold” whereby a journal provides immediate OA to articles on the publisher’s website and may levy a fee as an alternative to library subscription.
There is consensus that established models of scholarly communication, especially related to copyright, inhibit scientific progress, and RCUK emphasise that gold OA must be CC-BY. In response, traditional publishers have moved towards a “hybrid” model whereby they facilitate green by permitting “self-archiving” – often subject to embargo – but increasingly promote gold whereby authors pay a fee to publish CC-BY (average fee across the sector ≈ £1800 per article), in stark contrast to the use of open licences in OE more generally and reflecting commercial interests with evidence that publishers benefit in the form of “double dipping”, effectively paid twice for the same content via library subscription and OA fees (Pinfield et al 2014).
To comply with HEFCE, there is considerable activity across the sector to develop robust infrastructure – repositories, CRIS, RIOXX, Jisc’s “Publication Router”, “Open Mirror”, Monitor project and CORE aggregator. Individual HEIs are also iterating to develop infrastructure and appropriate internal policies; at Leeds Beckett, like many Universities, we are looking into the management of APCs to ensure double-dipping does not occur which requires collaboration between library, research office and faculty. In addition, the more specialised requirements of a HEFCE compliant repository means we are reviewing our infrastructure and considering a Jorum “Window” to manage OER rather than the current “blended” repository comprising OA research and OER.
HEFCE policy serves to emphasise OA over OE and there are questions of academic support structure; academic librarians typically specialise in research support or teaching and learning. Increasingly, librarians advocate for OA/OE, particularly using the HEFCE mandate as a tool to encourage OA publishing routes and it was thought OE/OA would solve the problem of the “serial crisis”, this is now not thought to be the case (Harris, 2012).
OA and OE have much to share and remain convergent in many ways. This paper will describe the developing OA landscape and invite participants to explore synergies and dissonance with OE in the contexts of infrastructure, policy and licensing; we will argue that to avoid continued commercial exploitation, the fostering of partnerships across the academy is crucial to mainstreaming Open Education.
Pinfield, S., Salter, J. and Bath, P.A. (2015) The ‘total cost of publication’ in a hyb
Advocating Open Access: Before, during and after HEFCENick Sheppard
Since “self-archiving” of research outputs was first mooted in the mid-1990s, initiatives towards “green” Open Access (OA) across the sector have met with generally limited success and coverage in institutional and subject repositories is generally cited at around 20-30%. However, since the Finch report in 2012 combined with OA policies from RCUK, also in 2012, and HEFCE the following year, there is little doubt that a tipping point of awareness has been reached. This session will aim to contextualise the HEFCE policy in the broader history of Open Access and present a case study of a non-research intensive University and how the repository manager has sought to liaise with academic support services in order to facilitate knowledge exchange across the University. - See more at: http://www.cilip.org.uk/events/open-access-advocacy#sthash.9YqReHt0.dpuf
Open Metrics for Open Repositories at OR2012Nick Sheppard
Slides for a paper on "Open Metrics for Open Repositories" based on the paper available from http://opus.bath.ac.uk/30226/ and presented by Nick Sheppard at the Seventh International Conference on Open Repositories (OR2012) held in Edinburgh from 9-13th July 2012.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
8. Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC)
“Data are the main assets of economic and social research. We recognise publicly-funded research data as
valuable, long-term resources that, where practical, must be made available for secondary scientific research.”
ESRC Research Data Policy
This plan looks at managing quantitative and qualitative
data, including audio interviews. The plan discusses ethical
issues around a very sensitive dataset, including using
consent and anonymisation to generate data which can be
shared and reused.
13. Choose a repository
• Research Data Leeds Repository
• Research Data Leeds Registry
• ESRC – UK Data Service
• ReShare repository
• Wellcome Trust
• Deposit data in any
recognised data repository
• re3data.org
• Deposit with recommended
service
• Email DOI or URL to
researchdataenquiries@leeds.ac.u
k
ReShare is where ESRC grant holders submit the data from their
research grants, as a contractual requirement under the ESRC
research data policy.
14. Deposit in Research Data Leeds
https://library.leeds.ac.uk/research-data-deposit
http://archive.researchdata.leeds.ac.uk/