Slides from a webinar for the Royal Society of Chemistry on 24th February 2016.
See the URI below to access the full report from the RSC survey "The role of libraries in open access publishing":
http://www.rsc.org/campaigns/m/lc/lc16013/open-access/
We often hear that we are in a transitional phase of open access publishing, but it is not always clear how we will reach a fully open access environment, what that will look like and what it means for scholarly research. This webinar will draw insights from a librarian survey we ran in 2015, discussing areas where librarians feel a lack of confidence and presenting technical and policy developments.
Register to gain a deeper understanding of:
• The historical and political context of scholarly publishing
• Funder and other policy requirements for Open Access (e.g. HEFCE and RCUK in the UK, Horizon2020 in Europe and NIH is the USA)
• Developing models of OA including “Gold”, “Green” and “hybrid”
• Jisc support services for OA
• Social media and OA – e.g. “Altmetrics” (alternative metrics) as potential indicators of impact beyond the traditional readership of scholarly material
Leveraging a Library CMS and Social Media to promote #openaccess (OA) to inst...Nick Sheppard
The confluence of various technologies and Open Access (OA) initiatives make it easy to share research outputs via social media and assess the reach and impact of dissemination. The Library at Leeds Beckett utilises LibGuides as our CMS and supports the institutional research management infrastructure comprising Symplectic Elements and EPrints, and we have developed a dedicated series of LibGuides around selected themes comprising a range of relevant information and including institutional research outputs. For World Diabetes Day, for example, we curated a collection of research outputs and utilised the Elements API to display a date ordered list of citations including, where available, links to author versions, self-archived and openly accessible in EPrints alongside an embedded Twitter feed from @WDD, the Official Twitter account of the campaign from the International Diabetes Federation. The page was disseminated via Twitter from accounts operated by the Library, @BeckettLibrary and @BeckettResearch, including targeted tweets to @WDD and individual academics. With over 4,500 and 1,500 followers respectively these accounts are well subscribed and received several "retweets". The guide, whilst highlighting and strengthening the role of the library as a tool for researchers, was also an advocacy tool to engage academics in OA. This paper will explore the context and technology of this initiative and present data from Twitter analytics and so called "altmetrics" as a means of visualising how research is shared and disseminated online and which are potential indicators of impact beyond the traditional readership of scholarly material, especially in conjunction with OA.
Open Access, Journal, Institutional Repository and BeyondLeslie Chan
Presentation at the Scholarly Communication Retreat, St. Michael's College, University of Toronto. Oct.6, 2015. This talk is a personal perspective on Open Access and what I see as the key impetus for engaging in open access practices. I highlight some recent innovations, both in terms of tools and modes of collaborative research enabled by OA. I also highlight recent developments in financial models in support of OA journal and monograph publishing.
Cultural heritage organizations are collaborating with community partners to tell history in innovative and interactive ways.
How do we design workflows to capture community content, how can we share content “sustainably”, and why does it matter? This session will focus on best practices for gathering community contributions whether you’re collaborating in a physical space or virtually. We’ll share some “lessons learned” on working with cultural heritage data.
NISO Two Day Virtual Conference:
Using the Web as an E-Content Distribution Platform:
Challenges and Opportunities
Oct 21-22, 2014
Frances Pinter, Founder and Executive Director, Knowledge Unlatched
Leveraging a Library CMS and Social Media to promote #openaccess (OA) to inst...Nick Sheppard
The confluence of various technologies and Open Access (OA) initiatives make it easy to share research outputs via social media and assess the reach and impact of dissemination. The Library at Leeds Beckett utilises LibGuides as our CMS and supports the institutional research management infrastructure comprising Symplectic Elements and EPrints, and we have developed a dedicated series of LibGuides around selected themes comprising a range of relevant information and including institutional research outputs. For World Diabetes Day, for example, we curated a collection of research outputs and utilised the Elements API to display a date ordered list of citations including, where available, links to author versions, self-archived and openly accessible in EPrints alongside an embedded Twitter feed from @WDD, the Official Twitter account of the campaign from the International Diabetes Federation. The page was disseminated via Twitter from accounts operated by the Library, @BeckettLibrary and @BeckettResearch, including targeted tweets to @WDD and individual academics. With over 4,500 and 1,500 followers respectively these accounts are well subscribed and received several "retweets". The guide, whilst highlighting and strengthening the role of the library as a tool for researchers, was also an advocacy tool to engage academics in OA. This paper will explore the context and technology of this initiative and present data from Twitter analytics and so called "altmetrics" as a means of visualising how research is shared and disseminated online and which are potential indicators of impact beyond the traditional readership of scholarly material, especially in conjunction with OA.
Open Access, Journal, Institutional Repository and BeyondLeslie Chan
Presentation at the Scholarly Communication Retreat, St. Michael's College, University of Toronto. Oct.6, 2015. This talk is a personal perspective on Open Access and what I see as the key impetus for engaging in open access practices. I highlight some recent innovations, both in terms of tools and modes of collaborative research enabled by OA. I also highlight recent developments in financial models in support of OA journal and monograph publishing.
Cultural heritage organizations are collaborating with community partners to tell history in innovative and interactive ways.
How do we design workflows to capture community content, how can we share content “sustainably”, and why does it matter? This session will focus on best practices for gathering community contributions whether you’re collaborating in a physical space or virtually. We’ll share some “lessons learned” on working with cultural heritage data.
NISO Two Day Virtual Conference:
Using the Web as an E-Content Distribution Platform:
Challenges and Opportunities
Oct 21-22, 2014
Frances Pinter, Founder and Executive Director, Knowledge Unlatched
Open access (OA) to scholarly literature recently hit a major milestone: Half of all research articles published become open access, either immediately or after an embargo period. Are the articles you read among them? What about the articles you write? Are the journals to which you submit open-access friendly? What about the journals for which you peer review? Are there any reasons why the public should not have access to the results of taxpayer-funded research?
In this slideshow, Jill Cirasella (Associate Librarian for Public Services and Scholarly Communication, Graduate Center, CUNY) explains the motivation for OA, describes the details of OA, and differentiates between publishing in open access journals (“gold” OA) and self-archiving works in OA repositories (“green” OA). She also dispels persistent myths about OA and examines some of the challenges to OA.
What does success look like when it comes to library discoverability? Index based discovery systems have seen a dramatic rate of adoption since introduction to the research ecosystem in 2009, with more than 9,000 libraries relying on a discovery system to provide users with a comprehensive index to their offerings. Some issues bar the way to providing this comprehensive view, but many challenges have been overcome through collaboration between libraries, content providers and discovery partners. The NISO ODI initiative began to examine these issues in 2011, and released a best practice in June 2014.
Speakers will highlight examples of successful collaboration, note continued areas of challenge, and provide insight on how the Open Discovery Initiative Conformance Checklists can be used as a mechanism to evaluate content provider or discovery provider conformance with the best practice.
Reveal Digital: innovative library crowdfunding model for open access digita...PaolaMarchionni
Slides from a webinar held on 1 Dec 2016 by Jisc and Reveal Digital on Reveal Digital's library crowdfunding model for their Independent Voices digital collection. This includes information on pledging fees for UK universities as negotiated by Jisc Collections. A recording of the webinar is available at https://goo.gl/kEHRrD.
Going for Gold and Greener Pastures: Open Access Explained
Presentation by Lisa Kruesi, Helen Morgan and Andrew Heath from The University of Queensland Scholarly Publishing and Digititisation Service for Open Access Week, October 2012.
Adaption—The Changing Nature of Libraries (Part 1 of 1), Roger SchonfeldAllen Press
Video of this presentation is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SV58tFYgA2g&index=4&list=PLybpVL27qHff3BVHuNXqYsqTs2e98_MpT
Sometimes survival means being faster, stronger, or smarter. Sometimes it requires flexibility, alertness, and the ability to adapt. Academic libraries are in the midst of a digital transformation, but in this transitional period some real tensions demand strategic nuance. An expert in the changing roles of the library, scholarly publisher, and learned society, keynote speaker Roger Schonfeld will lead us through the three tensions underlying the changing library environment. Each of these tensions is a budgetary tension, and each of them is a systems tension, and for each of them the library would benefit from a more sophisticated engagement by publishers and vendors.
Digital Publishing in the Arts and Humanitiesmattphillpott
Dr Matt Phillpott
Fellows Forum (School of Advanced Study, University of London)
3 June 2015, 1pm-2pm
Talk about the various forms of digital publishing open to artresearchers including articles, monographs, blogs, websites, presentations, and repositories.
Philosophical Transactions to the Finch report: the events that have defined ...Nick Sheppard
Throughout history the creation and dissemination of knowledge has been influenced by innumerable ‘events’, cultural, technological and political in nature; from the invention of Cuneiform to the rise and fall of Classical civilizations and cultural incubation by the Catholic Church through the European Dark Ages to the Enlightenment. The invention of the printing press is obviously pivotal and in 1665 Henry Oldenburg inaugurated the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Phil Trans), utilising print technology to establish the principles of scientific priority and peer review that have defined scientific discourse ever since.
In the 20th Century scholarly publishing became exploited by commercial academic publishers and, as journal prices began to outstrip inflation, ultimately resulted in the “serials crisis” of the 1970s. These unsustainable price rises coincided with emergence of the internet and in 1990 Stevan Harnad introduced Psycoloquy, the first peer-reviewed online scientific journal which paved the way for free academic publishing on the web after 1993. In spite of this, and with the World Wide Web over 2 decades old, the traditional subscription model persists, dominated by multinational corporations that generate huge profits and restrict access to scholarly material.
The Open Access movement is a worldwide effort to make scholarly work available online to everyone regardless of their ability to pay for access and in 2011 David Willetts set up a Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, chaired by Dame Janet Finch and publishing the so called “Finch report” in 2012. The HEFCE policy on OA that comes into effect in 2016 perhaps represents the most recent cultural and political event in this space.
This paper will explore the events that continue to influence academic dissemination and examine how Universities and academics themselves, particularly early career researchers, can utilise modern technology to be part of their own open knowledge event.
Open access (OA) to scholarly literature recently hit a major milestone: Half of all research articles published become open access, either immediately or after an embargo period. Are the articles you read among them? What about the articles you write? Are the journals to which you submit open-access friendly? What about the journals for which you peer review? Are there any reasons why the public should not have access to the results of taxpayer-funded research?
In this slideshow, Jill Cirasella (Associate Librarian for Public Services and Scholarly Communication, Graduate Center, CUNY) explains the motivation for OA, describes the details of OA, and differentiates between publishing in open access journals (“gold” OA) and self-archiving works in OA repositories (“green” OA). She also dispels persistent myths about OA and examines some of the challenges to OA.
What does success look like when it comes to library discoverability? Index based discovery systems have seen a dramatic rate of adoption since introduction to the research ecosystem in 2009, with more than 9,000 libraries relying on a discovery system to provide users with a comprehensive index to their offerings. Some issues bar the way to providing this comprehensive view, but many challenges have been overcome through collaboration between libraries, content providers and discovery partners. The NISO ODI initiative began to examine these issues in 2011, and released a best practice in June 2014.
Speakers will highlight examples of successful collaboration, note continued areas of challenge, and provide insight on how the Open Discovery Initiative Conformance Checklists can be used as a mechanism to evaluate content provider or discovery provider conformance with the best practice.
Reveal Digital: innovative library crowdfunding model for open access digita...PaolaMarchionni
Slides from a webinar held on 1 Dec 2016 by Jisc and Reveal Digital on Reveal Digital's library crowdfunding model for their Independent Voices digital collection. This includes information on pledging fees for UK universities as negotiated by Jisc Collections. A recording of the webinar is available at https://goo.gl/kEHRrD.
Going for Gold and Greener Pastures: Open Access Explained
Presentation by Lisa Kruesi, Helen Morgan and Andrew Heath from The University of Queensland Scholarly Publishing and Digititisation Service for Open Access Week, October 2012.
Adaption—The Changing Nature of Libraries (Part 1 of 1), Roger SchonfeldAllen Press
Video of this presentation is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SV58tFYgA2g&index=4&list=PLybpVL27qHff3BVHuNXqYsqTs2e98_MpT
Sometimes survival means being faster, stronger, or smarter. Sometimes it requires flexibility, alertness, and the ability to adapt. Academic libraries are in the midst of a digital transformation, but in this transitional period some real tensions demand strategic nuance. An expert in the changing roles of the library, scholarly publisher, and learned society, keynote speaker Roger Schonfeld will lead us through the three tensions underlying the changing library environment. Each of these tensions is a budgetary tension, and each of them is a systems tension, and for each of them the library would benefit from a more sophisticated engagement by publishers and vendors.
Digital Publishing in the Arts and Humanitiesmattphillpott
Dr Matt Phillpott
Fellows Forum (School of Advanced Study, University of London)
3 June 2015, 1pm-2pm
Talk about the various forms of digital publishing open to artresearchers including articles, monographs, blogs, websites, presentations, and repositories.
Philosophical Transactions to the Finch report: the events that have defined ...Nick Sheppard
Throughout history the creation and dissemination of knowledge has been influenced by innumerable ‘events’, cultural, technological and political in nature; from the invention of Cuneiform to the rise and fall of Classical civilizations and cultural incubation by the Catholic Church through the European Dark Ages to the Enlightenment. The invention of the printing press is obviously pivotal and in 1665 Henry Oldenburg inaugurated the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Phil Trans), utilising print technology to establish the principles of scientific priority and peer review that have defined scientific discourse ever since.
In the 20th Century scholarly publishing became exploited by commercial academic publishers and, as journal prices began to outstrip inflation, ultimately resulted in the “serials crisis” of the 1970s. These unsustainable price rises coincided with emergence of the internet and in 1990 Stevan Harnad introduced Psycoloquy, the first peer-reviewed online scientific journal which paved the way for free academic publishing on the web after 1993. In spite of this, and with the World Wide Web over 2 decades old, the traditional subscription model persists, dominated by multinational corporations that generate huge profits and restrict access to scholarly material.
The Open Access movement is a worldwide effort to make scholarly work available online to everyone regardless of their ability to pay for access and in 2011 David Willetts set up a Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, chaired by Dame Janet Finch and publishing the so called “Finch report” in 2012. The HEFCE policy on OA that comes into effect in 2016 perhaps represents the most recent cultural and political event in this space.
This paper will explore the events that continue to influence academic dissemination and examine how Universities and academics themselves, particularly early career researchers, can utilise modern technology to be part of their own open knowledge event.
Institutionalisation of an open access – a new possibility for research. A s...Birute Railiene
Birute Railiene. Institutionalisation of an open access – a new possibility for research : a survey of perception and demand
Paper for the 5th International Conference of the European Society of History of Science, Athens, 1-3 November 2012
OpenAccess policies as tools for innovative research and educational challenges.Università di Padova
Intervention to the International Conference
The future of political science: an international and interdisciplinary conversation, Università degli Studi di Padova, 14-15 december 2012.
Alex and Conor introduce SAH Journal (sahjournal.com) as an open access academic journal project involving the collaborative efforts of emerging and established scholars as well as academic librarians. Conor explains the benefits of collaborating with research librarians through publishing. Alex asserts that librarians (libraries) are perfectly positioned to enter into direct competition with established commercial journal publishers. He explains the mechanics of electronic publishing from conceptional planning to implementation via, in this instance, Open Journal Systems (OJS).
O Futuro da Biblioteconomia no Brasil: Workshop Interativo
Quando: 07 de outubro de 2015 – 10h – 15h
Onde: Auditório do INRAD
Instituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP
Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, s/nº – Rua 1 – Cerqueira César – São Paulo, SP.
This presentation in intended to introduce Open Access (OA); the OA movement; OA advantages for authors, institutions and society; OA business models and publishing in OA; important tools for research and publishing; and other ‘open’ initiatives.
Lezione di Emma Lazzeri e Paolo Manghi (Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell’Informazione Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche) entro la Didattica sperimentale per dottorandi dell'Università di Pisa 2018-2019 - Modulo offerti dal LabCD
Open Science and European Access Policies in H2020 Reme Melero
GEOTEC UJI and FOSTER project organized a training seminar in the context of GEO-C ESR entitled “Open Science and European Open Access policies in H2020”.
The seminar took place in Castellon (Spain), Feb 12th from 9.30 to 14.00.
Why Research Libraries supporting Open Access is vital to the achievement of ...ldore1
The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) supports the Lyon Declaration on Access to Information and Development, 2014 (which was a response/commitment to promote meaningful access to information as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals), which states that a right to information worldwide would be transformational. Access to information supports development by empowering people, especially marginalised people and those living in poverty.
In this talk there will be a discussion of the vital importance of the availability of Open Access research publications to improve access to information and knowledge to enable the fulfilment of the SDGs to end poverty, improve health and education, reduce inequality, encourage economic growth, and tackle environmental destruction and climate change.
There will also be discussion of the role Libraries have to play in supporting Open Access at a national and local level, the options for publishing Open Access and the challenges.
Finally, the tools available to measure what proportion of your institutions papers are available as Open Access and what proportion are covering SDG topics will be demonstrated. These Tools will include Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Altmetrics Explorer.
Similar to A librarian's road map to open access (20)
Reflections on Open Educational Practice Nick Sheppard
Slides from a presentation by Antonio Martínez-Arboleda on 18 January 2022: A global challenge: digital and open education for inclusive societies
Antonio Martínez-Arboleda is Academic Lead for Open Educational Practice and Co-Director of the Centre for Research in Digital Education of the University of Leeds. Antonio has been a champion and practitioner of open education since 2009, initially as part of the Humbox team and co-researcher of the JISC funded project OpenLIVES on Digitised Life Stories. His scholarship focuses on the areas of OER (Open Educational Resources) and Critical Digital Pedagogies.
Sustainable support for OER at the University of EdinburghNick Sheppard
Slides from a presentation by Lorna Campbell on 18 January 2022: A global challenge: digital and open education for inclusive societies
Lorna is a learning technology service manager at the University of Edinburgh’s Open Educational Resources (OER) Service. She is also a Trustee of Wikimedia UK and the Association for Learning Technology and has a longstanding personal commitment to supporting open knowledge and education. Her blog, Open World (http://lornamcampbell.org), features personal reflections on all aspects of open education, and she is an active member of the #femedtech network. You can find Lorna on twitter at @lornamcampbell.
Contributing to the global commons: Repositories and WikimediaNick Sheppard
There is huge potential for universities and their libraries to leverage Wikimedia in order to expose research outputs and collections. Wikimedia comprises sixteen projects in total, including Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata. At the University of Leeds, the Research Data Management Service have successfully run a project that focuses on linking research data with the Wikimedia suite of tools via a series of ‘editathons’, in order to increase the visibility of research data and enable reuse on Wikipedia and elsewhere. The project - "Manage it locally to share it globally: RDM and Wikimedia Commons" - was the winning submission to a competition launched in May 2018 and sponsored by SPARC Europe, Jisc and the University of Cambridge, called the "Data Management Engagement Award", which aimed to address cultural challenges involved in promoting effective research data practices.
The project has served as a springboard to further explore Wikimedia strategically, both at the University of Leeds and across the White Rose Consortium. For example we are collaborating on a new project looking at Wikipedia citations of research from York, Sheffield and Leeds, and the proportion of these that are open access. The long term goal might be to establish a "Wikimedian in Residence" across the consortium. In this talk, we will present the project's outputs - including a toolkit that will enable other institutions to apply the same methodology. In addition we will explore the potential of Wikidata to link up repositories and other data silos in a manner that enables reuse and increases impact.
Manage it locally to share it globally: RDM and Wikimedia CommonsNick Sheppard
Slides for Internet Librarian International 2018 about the Data Management Engagement Award, a first-ever competition launched to elicit new and imaginative ideas for engaging researchers in the practices of good Research Data Management (RDM) - http://www.rdmengagementaward.org/
Using social media and quantitative metrics to engage the research communityNick Sheppard
The modern university Library comprises repositories, publishing platforms and social media and is central to the dissemination mission of the University. Recent progress towards ‘Open Access’ has enabled research to be more effectively disseminated via the internet and aggregated into an Institutional Repository, empowering institutions to disseminate their own research and monitor associated metrics. A repository is also an ideal home for grey literature and research data, where IPR is more likely to be retained by universities which are increasingly minting DOIs for this type of content, ensuring persistence and enabling (alternative) metrics. This case study will present a Library led social media initiative at the University of Leeds examining local challenges and presenting usage data from Altmetric.com, Twitter Analytics and IRUS-UK.
The University of Leeds is a research intensive Russell Group University with a well-developed ecosystem of research oriented Twitter accounts. These include both University branded accounts overseen by schools, faculties or research groups as well as a huge number of ‘personal’ accounts operated by individual staff or students. In 2012 an account focussed on research data was set up in the Library as part of the Roadmap project but was used only sporadically before being rebranded in 2017 and used more actively to engage with the research community, to promote both OA research papers and datasets.
Themes and challenges include quantitative metrics, institutional and departmental oversight of social media, operational implications and sustainability.
Has anyone seen my data? Incentivising #opendata sharing with altmetricsNick Sheppard
As an important component of the scholarly record, research data, software and code are increasingly managed as research outputs in their own right, though are not typically subject to peer review.
In line with the broader ‘open research’ movement there is a growing impetus for datasets, software and code to be curated in repositories, openly available wherever possible subject to relevant legal and ethical constraints.
Data repositories such as Figshare, Dryad and Zenodo routinely allocate DOIs for deposited data while many universities in the UK also allocate and mint DOIs in their nascent institutionally based data repositories through Datacite which means they will be automatically tracked by altmetric.com in the same way as journal articles.
While the repository infrastructure continues to develop and there are pockets of best practice, data sharing and reuse is not yet fully established across UK HE. Reward mechanisms are immature and data citation, for example, is limited and not easy to track. Clarivate Analytics’ Data Citation Index coverage of UK based repositories is still relatively low and, as a subscription based product, is not widely accessible. COUNTER compliant downloads can be derived from IRUSdata-UK (beta) which currently tracks 27 UK based institutional data repositories.
Altmetrics therefore offers a low barrier method to track engagement with datasets and, in lieu of a more formal process, might be regarded as a type of informal peer review. We have undertaken a preliminary analysis of repositories that participate in IRUSdata-UK (beta) using it as a source of DOIs to run against the altmetric.com API to discover to what extent research data, software and code is being shared.
This talk will present these preliminary results and explore how and why datasets are being shared across the various platforms tracked by altmetric.com and potential barriers. It will consider how data repository managers can encourage and facilitate data sharing through social media networks, blogs and “data journalism” and will draw on the Research Data Management (RDM) Engagement Award at the University of Leeds which is exploring linking RDM with the Open Science movement via the Wikimedia suite of tools. What does the altmetric data currently tell us about how research data is being linked to this global platform
Extending and measuring the reach and impact of research output: #openaccess,...Nick Sheppard
Research can be easily disseminated online amongst communities of researchers and interested lay people, via social media for example, and it is clearly beneficial if that research is freely accessible on the open web rather than restricted by subscription access. Evidence suggests that OA can increase traditional citations and, increasingly, developments in alternative or “altmetrics” are enabling online social activity around research to be recorded and measured. This session will explore initiatives in this are at Leeds Beckett in the context of the new HEFCE requirements for OA that come into effect in 2016.
Significant developments in OA, driven by HEFCE’s “Policy for open access in the post-2014 Research Excellence Framework” state that authors’ final peer-reviewed manuscripts must be deposited in a repository on acceptance for publication i.e. “green” OA. In many ways the policy is a response to the Finch report and RCUK policy which emphasise “gold” whereby a journal provides immediate OA to articles on the publisher’s website and may levy a fee as an alternative to library subscription.
There is consensus that established models of scholarly communication, especially related to copyright, inhibit scientific progress, and RCUK emphasise that gold OA must be CC-BY. In response, traditional publishers have moved towards a “hybrid” model whereby they facilitate green by permitting “self-archiving” – often subject to embargo – but increasingly promote gold whereby authors pay a fee to publish CC-BY (average fee across the sector ≈ £1800 per article), in stark contrast to the use of open licences in OE more generally and reflecting commercial interests with evidence that publishers benefit in the form of “double dipping”, effectively paid twice for the same content via library subscription and OA fees (Pinfield et al 2014).
To comply with HEFCE, there is considerable activity across the sector to develop robust infrastructure – repositories, CRIS, RIOXX, Jisc’s “Publication Router”, “Open Mirror”, Monitor project and CORE aggregator. Individual HEIs are also iterating to develop infrastructure and appropriate internal policies; at Leeds Beckett, like many Universities, we are looking into the management of APCs to ensure double-dipping does not occur which requires collaboration between library, research office and faculty. In addition, the more specialised requirements of a HEFCE compliant repository means we are reviewing our infrastructure and considering a Jorum “Window” to manage OER rather than the current “blended” repository comprising OA research and OER.
HEFCE policy serves to emphasise OA over OE and there are questions of academic support structure; academic librarians typically specialise in research support or teaching and learning. Increasingly, librarians advocate for OA/OE, particularly using the HEFCE mandate as a tool to encourage OA publishing routes and it was thought OE/OA would solve the problem of the “serial crisis”, this is now not thought to be the case (Harris, 2012).
OA and OE have much to share and remain convergent in many ways. This paper will describe the developing OA landscape and invite participants to explore synergies and dissonance with OE in the contexts of infrastructure, policy and licensing; we will argue that to avoid continued commercial exploitation, the fostering of partnerships across the academy is crucial to mainstreaming Open Education.
Pinfield, S., Salter, J. and Bath, P.A. (2015) The ‘total cost of publication’ in a hyb
Advocating Open Access: Before, during and after HEFCENick Sheppard
Since “self-archiving” of research outputs was first mooted in the mid-1990s, initiatives towards “green” Open Access (OA) across the sector have met with generally limited success and coverage in institutional and subject repositories is generally cited at around 20-30%. However, since the Finch report in 2012 combined with OA policies from RCUK, also in 2012, and HEFCE the following year, there is little doubt that a tipping point of awareness has been reached. This session will aim to contextualise the HEFCE policy in the broader history of Open Access and present a case study of a non-research intensive University and how the repository manager has sought to liaise with academic support services in order to facilitate knowledge exchange across the University. - See more at: http://www.cilip.org.uk/events/open-access-advocacy#sthash.9YqReHt0.dpuf
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
2. A librarian's road map to open
access
Nick Sheppard
Research Services Advisor
Technical Officer UKCoRR
3. Research Services Advisor
•Disclaimer: not a real Librarian
•Began working at Leeds Metropolitan University in
2007
•Repositories Start-up project (Jisc)
•Technical Officer for UKCoRR (UK Council of
Research Repositories)
–http://ukcorr.org
•Research Services Advisor (2015)
–Research Services team
–OA advocacy & training, policy compliance
–Technical infrastructure
–Research Data Management (RDM)
5. Altmetrics: a
manifesto
2010
Language
~100,000yrs
Writing
3500-3000
BCE
Proto-science
900 BCE - 500
CE
Printing press
invented
~1440 CE
Caxton brings printing to
Britain
~1476 CE
WWW invented
1989
Eprints software
released
2000
Babbage works on
Difference Engine
1823-1842
Universal Turing
Machine
1937
Henry Oldenburg
inaugurates
Phil.Trans
1665
Universities
/research output
increases
C19th-C20th
“Serials crisis”
1970s
Psycoloquy – 1st
online scientific
journal
1990
Stevan Harnad's
“subversive
proposal”
1994
Budapest Open
Access Initiative
2002 Finch report and
RCUK OA policy
2012
HEFCE announce
policy for OA in
post-2014 REF
2014
Mainstream social
media
2000-future Academic social
media
2007-future
Background detail from Scanned copy of reproduction in "Maps of Old London" (1908) of Ogilby & Morgan's Map of London
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:City_of_London_Ogilby_and_Morgan%27s_Map_of_1677.jpg (public domain)
6. The problem with Status Quo
*Status Quo at the Hammersmith Odeon in 1978
Public domain - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Status_Quo1978.jpg
1978* 2005
7. Stevan Harnad’s subversive
proposal (1994)
“If all scholars' preprints were universally available to all scholars by anonymous ftp
(and gopher, and World-Wide Web, and the search/retrieval wonders of the future),
NO scholar would ever consent to WITHDRAW any preprint of his from the public eye
after the refereed version was accepted for paper "PUBLICation." Instead, everyone
would, quite naturally, substitute the refereed, published reprint for the unrefereed
preprint.” http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/253351/
“one of the seminal texts of the open access
movement” Richard Poynder June 2014
By Rock1997 (Own work) [GFDL
(http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC BY-SA 4.0-
3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-
sa/4.0-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
8. Budapest Open Access Initiative
(2002)
“An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an
unprecedented public good…Removing access barriers to this literature will
accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor
and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the
foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for
knowledge.”
http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/
Recommended two complementary strategies:
•Self-archiving (green)
•Open-access journals (gold)
9. Royal Society of Chemistry librarian
survey 2015
The role of libraries in open access publishing (click to access full report)
10. Straw poll...
All taken into consideration,
what is your preferred model
of OA?
•Green
•Gold
•Unsure
16. Funding gold OA
A new market is emerging for OA article publication. Open APC data makes this
market as transparent as possible, and therefore of most benefit to customers
(institutions). Institutions and authors can then benchmark the APC costs they face
against those faced by others, or for other journals. There is no legal reason not to
do this.
https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/implementing-open-access#step8
•Institutionally allocated funds for gold OA
–Hybrid or gold only?
•Share article-level APC data
–Jisc Monitor project
–http://bit.ly/1DxZ8D6
•aggregate APC data from institutions
•Jisc Collections aggregated APC data
2014
–http://bit.ly/1TEHVT8 (figshare)
•Jisc total cost of ownership
18. RCUK policy (April 2012)
•RCUK-compliant journals
•Offer suitable gold OR suitable
green option
•Creative Commons-Attribution (CC-
BY)
•RCUK OA block grants
•Establish institutional publication
funds
•expect primary use to be payments
of APCs
•Preference is gold OA
•Decision lies with authors and
institutions
19. Horizon2020
Article 29.2 of the Model Grant Agreement sets out detailed legal requirements on open access to scientific
publications: under Horizon 2020, each beneficiary must ensure open access to all peer-reviewed scientific
publications relating to its results.
To meet this requirement, beneficiaries must, at the very least, ensure that any scientific peer reviewed
publications can be read online, downloaded and printed. Since any further rights - such as the right to copy,
distribute, search, link, crawl and mine - make publications more useful, beneficiaries should make every
effort to provide as many of these options as possible.
Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data in Horizon 2020 (p.4)
Open access infrastructure for research in Europe (OpenAIRE)
National OA Desk (NOAD)
20. NIH Public Access Policy
To advance science and improve human health, NIH makes the peer-reviewed articles it funds publicly
available on PubMed Central. The NIH public access policy requires scientists to submit final peer-
reviewed journal manuscripts that arise from NIH funds to PubMed Central immediately upon
acceptance for publication.
https://publicaccess.nih.gov/
21. HEFCE bombshell (April 2013)
“to be eligible for submission to the
post-2014 REF, authors’ final peer-
reviewed manuscripts must have
been deposited in an institutional or
subject repository on acceptance for
publication”
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/201
4/201407/
23. Jisc services
•Policy compliance
–SHERPA services
–Monitor Local (alpha)
•Discovery, usage and impact
–CORE (Connecting Repositories)
–IRUS-UK
•Cost management
–Jisc Monitor
•Metadata and interoperability
–RIOXX
–ORCID
We’re working to develop services, provide support, and influence policy in order to
enable UK higher education to realise the rewards of open access (OA).
https://www.jisc.ac.uk/content/open-access
24.
25. OA and impact
•Fundamentals of research?
–Creating, using, sharing and
accessing information
•Increases efficiency of research
process
•Evidence of increased citation
•The Open Access Citation
Advantage Service -
http://sparceurope.org/oaca/
As scholarly communication moves increasingly online, more indicators
have become available: how many times an article has been
bookmarked, blogged about, cited in Wikipedia and so on. These
metrics can be considered altmetrics – alternative metrics of impact.
(Piwowar 2013)
26. Traditional bibliometrics
“the branch of library science concerned with the application of mathematical and statistical
analysis to bibliography; the statistical analysis of books, articles, or other publications.”
(Oxford English Dictionary Online)
•Citation count & h-index
•Journal Impact Factor (JIF)
•Other impact measures
–Knowledge transfer
–Activities (presentations,
consultancy, review)
–Prizes
–Public engagement / education
–Policy documents
•Media
–TV and radio
–Blogs/social media
27. Alternative metrics
•Various flavours
–Plum analytics -
http://www.plumanalytics.com/
–Impact story - https://impactstory.org/
–Altmetric - http://www.altmetric.com/
•Article level metrics
–frontiers in Psychology
http://journal.frontiersin.org/arti
cle/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058/
abstract
–PLoS One
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/
article?id=10.1371/journal.pon
e.0121708
–Repositories
–IRUS-UK
–Statistics at Leeds Beckett
•The end of JIF?
33. Paradigm shift?
•Is green a long term solution?
–Maintains subscription model
•Is gold sustainable?
–New serials crisis?
•Books and monographs
•What might a new paradigm look
like?
•Institutional/library publishing?
–PKP - Open Journal System e.g.
http://journals.ed.ac.uk/
•Open Library of the Humanities
–https://www.openlibhums.org/
–Library consortium model
–Extend to STEM?
•Network effects
–OA and social media
–Targetted dissemination
34. Open Access: to the General
Benefit of Mankind
Oldenburg, H,. (1665) Epistle Dedicatory. Phil. Trans. 1. pp.1-2
doi: 10.1098/rstl.1665.0001
Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Henry_Oldenburg.jpg
This image is in the public domain because its copyright has expired.
35. References & bibliography
•Suber, P. Open Access Overview. Available at: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm [Accessed 17
November 2014]
•Guédon, J.-C. (2001) In Oldenburg’s long shadow: librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of
scientific publishing. Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/6375/ [Accessed 17 November 2016]
•Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002) Available at: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml [Accessed 17
November 2014]
•Yiotis, K. (2005) The Open Access Initiative: a new paradigm for scholarly communications. Information Technology
and Libraries 24(4). Available at: http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/view/3378 [Accessed 17th November
2014]
•Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications: Report of the Working Group
on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings (June 2012) Available at http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-
content/uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf [Accessed 17 November 2014]
•RCUK Policy on Open Access (April 2012) Available at
http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/openaccess/policy/ [Accessed 17 November 2014]
•HEFCE (2013) Policy for open access in the post-2014 Research Excellence Framework
Available at http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2014/201407/ [Accessed 17 November 2014]
•Eve, M.P. (2014) Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future,
Cambridge University Press Available OA at http://www.cambridge.org/do/titles/open-access-
and-humanities-contexts-controversies-and-future/ [Accessed 24th February 2016]
•Sheppard, NE and Bower, K (2015) Leveraging a Library CMS and Social Media to promote
#openaccess (OA) to institutional research output. In: Internet Librarian International 2015, 20-
21st October 2015, London, UK. (Unpublished) Available at
http://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/1812/ [Accessed 24th Feb 2016]