Submitted by: Hamid Mnati Dafir. Submitted to :
Assis. Prof. Adil Al Thamiry (Ph.D)
Basrah university / Iraq
2016
 In traditional (older) forms of discourse analysis
the term discourse was used interchangeably with
text, so the written text was referred to as written
discourse and vice versa.{Baker and Ellec 20011}
today there is distinction made between discourse
and text .”Discourse analysis concerned with the
construction of sentences but in recent years it
has been increasing interest in analysing the way
sentences work in sequence to produce coherent
stretches of language .”
• “Discourse analysis focuses on the structure of
naturally occurring spoken language , as found in
such discourses as conversations , interviews,
commentaries, and speeches.
 Where as “text analysis focuses on the structure of
written language , as found in such texts as essays,
notices , road signs , and chapters.”{Crystal,2006
:260)This distinction is not clear-cut .There are
many scholars (such as brown and yule)talk about
written and spoken text and others talked about
written and spoken discourse .Hawthorn (1992)says
“Text may be non- interactive whereas discourse is
interactive .This means text only convey some
meaning while discourse involves in both formal and
informal conversations or it is the use of written and
spoken language in a social context . Brown and
Yule, 1983:ix)refer to discourse as how human use
language to communicate” Stubb (1983:1) (as cited
in Baker and Ellec 2009: 32)refers to it (discourse)
 As attempt to study the organization of language above the
sentence or above the clause; and therefore to study large
linguistic units such as coversational exchanges or written texts .
 Some writers(such as van Dijk) refer to text analysis as discourse
analysis and some of discourse analysts focus on how meaning
and structure are signalled in text .others, especially since
the early 1990s, have used discourse analysis more critically to
examine issues relating to POWER, inequality and IDEOLOGY.{Baker
and Ellec, 2011:32}
 Brown and Yule defined text as the verbal record of a
communicative event.{Brown and Yule,1983:190}. They state that
“text depends on cohesive relationship within and between the
sentences , which create texture .Halliday and Hassen (as cited in
Brown and yule 1983) state that “a text has a texture and this is
what distinguishes it from something that is not text .Cohesive ties
between sentences stand out more clearly because they are the
only source of texture.{Baker and Ellec , 2011:195}
 A discourse is made up of utterances having the property
of coherence.
 We can conclude that Discourse is used in a very
comprehensive way for all those aspect of the situation
and context of communication not only the message
(spoken or written) but also the relation ship between the
addresser and addressee. In this sense discourse would
subsume the text , it is an umbrella which covers a wide
variety of actual research practices
with quite different aims and theoretical backgrounds. All
take language as
 their focus of interest’.Discourse involves the speaker’s
awareness of the audience and containing text which is
written to be orally delivered in a specific situation or
context.
 Baker.P and Ellec,S.(2011). Key Terms in
Discourse Analysis. New York:continuum.
 Brown, G and Yule, G.(1983).discourse analysis.
 Crystal, david.(2006).How language
works.Australia:penguin group.
 Johnstone , B.(2008).Discourse analysis.(second
edition),London :Blackwell publishing.
 The difference between text and discourse.(n.d)
retrievedfromhttp://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/con
tent/36/2/283.abstract
Thank you

How does discourse differ from text

  • 1.
    Submitted by: HamidMnati Dafir. Submitted to : Assis. Prof. Adil Al Thamiry (Ph.D) Basrah university / Iraq 2016
  • 2.
     In traditional(older) forms of discourse analysis the term discourse was used interchangeably with text, so the written text was referred to as written discourse and vice versa.{Baker and Ellec 20011} today there is distinction made between discourse and text .”Discourse analysis concerned with the construction of sentences but in recent years it has been increasing interest in analysing the way sentences work in sequence to produce coherent stretches of language .” • “Discourse analysis focuses on the structure of naturally occurring spoken language , as found in such discourses as conversations , interviews, commentaries, and speeches.
  • 3.
     Where as“text analysis focuses on the structure of written language , as found in such texts as essays, notices , road signs , and chapters.”{Crystal,2006 :260)This distinction is not clear-cut .There are many scholars (such as brown and yule)talk about written and spoken text and others talked about written and spoken discourse .Hawthorn (1992)says “Text may be non- interactive whereas discourse is interactive .This means text only convey some meaning while discourse involves in both formal and informal conversations or it is the use of written and spoken language in a social context . Brown and Yule, 1983:ix)refer to discourse as how human use language to communicate” Stubb (1983:1) (as cited in Baker and Ellec 2009: 32)refers to it (discourse)
  • 4.
     As attemptto study the organization of language above the sentence or above the clause; and therefore to study large linguistic units such as coversational exchanges or written texts .  Some writers(such as van Dijk) refer to text analysis as discourse analysis and some of discourse analysts focus on how meaning and structure are signalled in text .others, especially since the early 1990s, have used discourse analysis more critically to examine issues relating to POWER, inequality and IDEOLOGY.{Baker and Ellec, 2011:32}  Brown and Yule defined text as the verbal record of a communicative event.{Brown and Yule,1983:190}. They state that “text depends on cohesive relationship within and between the sentences , which create texture .Halliday and Hassen (as cited in Brown and yule 1983) state that “a text has a texture and this is what distinguishes it from something that is not text .Cohesive ties between sentences stand out more clearly because they are the only source of texture.{Baker and Ellec , 2011:195}
  • 5.
     A discourseis made up of utterances having the property of coherence.  We can conclude that Discourse is used in a very comprehensive way for all those aspect of the situation and context of communication not only the message (spoken or written) but also the relation ship between the addresser and addressee. In this sense discourse would subsume the text , it is an umbrella which covers a wide variety of actual research practices with quite different aims and theoretical backgrounds. All take language as  their focus of interest’.Discourse involves the speaker’s awareness of the audience and containing text which is written to be orally delivered in a specific situation or context.
  • 6.
     Baker.P andEllec,S.(2011). Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. New York:continuum.  Brown, G and Yule, G.(1983).discourse analysis.  Crystal, david.(2006).How language works.Australia:penguin group.  Johnstone , B.(2008).Discourse analysis.(second edition),London :Blackwell publishing.  The difference between text and discourse.(n.d) retrievedfromhttp://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/con tent/36/2/283.abstract
  • 7.