The document discusses assessment data from the health administration and counseling programs. It provides details on the measures used to collect assessment data, including course grades, assignments, student surveys, and exams. The data is being analyzed to determine if curriculum changes are needed based on program outcomes and student performance criteria. The next steps involve discussing the assessment findings to identify areas that need further review.

1. HELP! WE HAVE ASSESSMENT DATA Beth Patton, Associate Dean College of Natural Science Gil Linne, Dean College of Social Science

2. PROGRAM EXAMPLES HEALTH ADMINISTRATION MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COUNSELING DEGREE

3. HEALTH ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT DATA CURRICULUM CHANGE

4. ASSESSMENT DATA MEASURES Identified six program outcomes and specific performance criteria for each outcome Three measures were selected to assess each program outcome GRADES ASSIGNMENTS STUDENT/ALUMNI SURVEY

5. COURSE GRADES Six courses best aligned to program outcomes Course grades reflect the faculty perspective of student performance and learning Course grades are a quasi-direct measure of learning

6. COURSE GRADE SCORES

7. COURSE ASSIGNMENTS Six specific assignments were identified as closely aligning with each program outcome Assignment grades also reflect the faculty perspective of student learning Assignment grades are considered a direct measure of learning

8. COURSE ASSIGNMENT SCORES

9. STUDENT OUTCOMES SURVEY Survey provides information on the student perception of program effectiveness Survey reflected the performance criteria for each outcome Survey initially sent to 267 recent MHA graduates Response rate of 20.6 % Survey will also be embedded in the capstone course

10. STUDENT SURVEY DATA

11. COUNSELING ASSESSMENT

12. COGNITIVE MEASURES. Counselor Preparation Comprehensive Examination (CPCE) Measures a student’s knowledge of counseling content Program Benchmark – 75

14. AFFECTIVE MEASURES Academic Alignment Review Process (AARP) Student Survey Students respond to questions related to – Alignment of objectives Effectives of learning content Effectiveness of Instruction

16. PERFORMANCE MEASURES Measurement of clinical performance determined by- Site supervision evaluations of practicum Internship performance evaluations

18. ASSESSMENT DATA SO NOW WE HAVE DATA – WHAT NEXT?

19. DISCUSSION POINT OF ASSESSMENT IS TO BEGIN DISCUSSING THE FINDINGS…………. What should we be looking at? What needs further review?