Most business leaders believe that some portion of employee pay should be in the form of incentives, but are left struggling to find answers to key questions: How much of someone’s pay should be variable? And who should have incentive pay as part of their mix? How much of the incentive should be short-term and how much should be based on long-term performance? What type of incentive(s) should it be? What if I don’t pay incentives and just pay higher salaries than my competitors? Will that work just as well?
If these are questions you are facing, don’t miss this presentation!
Which Long-Term Incentive Plan is Right for Your Company? If you plan to grow your company, you will need a pay plan that rewards long-term performance. You just will! Employees want to know they can participate in the business value they help create.
The hard part is determining which value-sharing approach is most suitable. Should you share stock? If so, should you give away present value or just future value? If you do not want to share equity, do you still want to tie the incentive to business growth in some way? There are lots of questions to be answered before you can determine which LTIP strategy is best.
In short, we can help you decide how to pick the best LTIP for your company.
Cash or short-term incentive plans (STIP) engage employees in the process of achieving business objectives, reward desired behaviors, and help execute the organization’s long-term strategy. Incentive plans, when properly aligned to business outcomes and rolled-out effectively, can be a powerful tool that enable organizations to “do more with less” and achieve a greater return on investment (ROI) in cash compensation programs.
Most business leaders know that some portion of their pay construct should be in the form of incentives, but are left struggling to find answers to these kinds of questions: How much of someone’s pay should be variable? And who should have incentive pay as part of their mix? How much of the incentive should be short-term and how much should be based on long-term performance? What type of incentive(s) should it be. If these are questions you struggle with, you will not want to miss this.
Share Company Value without Sharing Equity. Many companies wonder whether there is a way to tie a long-term incentive to the value of the company without giving away equity. The answer is yes and the solution is Phantom Stock. This concept has become the answer for many company leaders who feel reluctant about sharing stock but feel equally strong that their key people should participate in the value they help create. This presentation will describe how phantom stock works and why it has become such a valuable solution for business leaders seeking an alternative to equity sharing. Whether you have a phantom stock plan now or are just considering whether it would work in your circumstance, you will not want to miss this presentation!
The COVID economy has likely created competing priorities for you as a business leader. You feel pressure to minimize your compensation expense and protect cash flow. At the same time, you need to incentivize employee performance so your people will be motivated to get results.
So, what should you do?
Tune into this webcast to learn why many enterprise leaders are finding phantom stock to be the answer. In this broadcast, we will show you how this kind of plan enables you to reward performance without increasing your compensation expense. You will also see how phantom stock allows you to share value without diluting owner equity.
In short, we will demonstrate why phantom stock is the compensation equivalent of “having your cake and eating it too.”
Equity/ Stock-based compensation is a method by which corporations use options to buy stock at subsidized/ no cost usually at a future date to incentivize, retain and reward their employees/ advisors.
Which Long-Term Incentive Plan is Right for Your Company? If you plan to grow your company, you will need a pay plan that rewards long-term performance. You just will! Employees want to know they can participate in the business value they help create.
The hard part is determining which value-sharing approach is most suitable. Should you share stock? If so, should you give away present value or just future value? If you do not want to share equity, do you still want to tie the incentive to business growth in some way? There are lots of questions to be answered before you can determine which LTIP strategy is best.
In short, we can help you decide how to pick the best LTIP for your company.
Cash or short-term incentive plans (STIP) engage employees in the process of achieving business objectives, reward desired behaviors, and help execute the organization’s long-term strategy. Incentive plans, when properly aligned to business outcomes and rolled-out effectively, can be a powerful tool that enable organizations to “do more with less” and achieve a greater return on investment (ROI) in cash compensation programs.
Most business leaders know that some portion of their pay construct should be in the form of incentives, but are left struggling to find answers to these kinds of questions: How much of someone’s pay should be variable? And who should have incentive pay as part of their mix? How much of the incentive should be short-term and how much should be based on long-term performance? What type of incentive(s) should it be. If these are questions you struggle with, you will not want to miss this.
Share Company Value without Sharing Equity. Many companies wonder whether there is a way to tie a long-term incentive to the value of the company without giving away equity. The answer is yes and the solution is Phantom Stock. This concept has become the answer for many company leaders who feel reluctant about sharing stock but feel equally strong that their key people should participate in the value they help create. This presentation will describe how phantom stock works and why it has become such a valuable solution for business leaders seeking an alternative to equity sharing. Whether you have a phantom stock plan now or are just considering whether it would work in your circumstance, you will not want to miss this presentation!
The COVID economy has likely created competing priorities for you as a business leader. You feel pressure to minimize your compensation expense and protect cash flow. At the same time, you need to incentivize employee performance so your people will be motivated to get results.
So, what should you do?
Tune into this webcast to learn why many enterprise leaders are finding phantom stock to be the answer. In this broadcast, we will show you how this kind of plan enables you to reward performance without increasing your compensation expense. You will also see how phantom stock allows you to share value without diluting owner equity.
In short, we will demonstrate why phantom stock is the compensation equivalent of “having your cake and eating it too.”
Equity/ Stock-based compensation is a method by which corporations use options to buy stock at subsidized/ no cost usually at a future date to incentivize, retain and reward their employees/ advisors.
Muds Services:
Constitution of Trust
Formation of ESOP Plan
Identification & Appraisal of Eligible Employees
Valuation of Company
Creation of ESOP pool
Documentation & Granting of ESOPs
https://muds.co.in/esop/
Employee stock option - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joymanumelwin
An employee stock option (ESO) is commonly viewed as a complex call option on the common stock of a company, granted by the company to an employee as part of the employee's remuneration package
Phantom Stock : It is an employee benefit plan that gives the selected employees, many of the benefits of stock ownership without actually giving them any company stock. That’s why, also referred to as "Shadow Stocks." The employees are not allotted actual shares, but are issued Options with underlying shares in it, the value of which increases over a period of time and that can be converted into a predetermined cash amount, depending upon the terms of the Stock Option Plan, without any actual allotment of shares. The payment terms may depend upon tenure of employment, performance, appraisal criterion, meeting the targets etc., or any combination of them as well.
Delivered to the Columbus chapter of the Society of Financial Service Professionals on April 13, 2017 by Kegler Brown's Tom Sigmund and Ted Lape of Lazear Capital Partners, this presentation defines and discussed the benefits of an ESOP (an employee stock ownership plan).
Although this presentation covers the basics of an ESOP, it details what they are used for, ESOP transactions, who is a good candidate, tax benefits, and ongoing ESOP considerations.
Compensation And Benefits In Hrm PowerPoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
Presenting this set of slides with name - Compensation And Benefits In Hrm Powerpoint Presentation Slides. This complete deck is oriented to make sure you do not lag in your presentations. Our creatively crafted slides come with apt research and planning. This exclusive deck with thirty five slides is here to help you to strategize, plan, analyse, or segment the topic with clear understanding and apprehension. Utilize ready to use presentation slides on Compensation And Benefits In Hrm Powerpoint Presentation Slide with all sorts of editable templates, charts and graphs, overviews, analysis templates. It is usable for marking important decisions and covering critical issues. Display and present all possible kinds of underlying nuances, progress factors for an all inclusive presentation for the teams. This presentation deck can be used by all professionals, managers, individuals, internal external teams involved in any company organization.
The presentation comprised the strategy to improve employee performances through compensation and benefit. The presentation also includes case study of FMCG industry.
Muds Services:
Constitution of Trust
Formation of ESOP Plan
Identification & Appraisal of Eligible Employees
Valuation of Company
Creation of ESOP pool
Documentation & Granting of ESOPs
https://muds.co.in/esop/
Employee stock option - compensation management - Manu Melwin Joymanumelwin
An employee stock option (ESO) is commonly viewed as a complex call option on the common stock of a company, granted by the company to an employee as part of the employee's remuneration package
Phantom Stock : It is an employee benefit plan that gives the selected employees, many of the benefits of stock ownership without actually giving them any company stock. That’s why, also referred to as "Shadow Stocks." The employees are not allotted actual shares, but are issued Options with underlying shares in it, the value of which increases over a period of time and that can be converted into a predetermined cash amount, depending upon the terms of the Stock Option Plan, without any actual allotment of shares. The payment terms may depend upon tenure of employment, performance, appraisal criterion, meeting the targets etc., or any combination of them as well.
Delivered to the Columbus chapter of the Society of Financial Service Professionals on April 13, 2017 by Kegler Brown's Tom Sigmund and Ted Lape of Lazear Capital Partners, this presentation defines and discussed the benefits of an ESOP (an employee stock ownership plan).
Although this presentation covers the basics of an ESOP, it details what they are used for, ESOP transactions, who is a good candidate, tax benefits, and ongoing ESOP considerations.
Compensation And Benefits In Hrm PowerPoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
Presenting this set of slides with name - Compensation And Benefits In Hrm Powerpoint Presentation Slides. This complete deck is oriented to make sure you do not lag in your presentations. Our creatively crafted slides come with apt research and planning. This exclusive deck with thirty five slides is here to help you to strategize, plan, analyse, or segment the topic with clear understanding and apprehension. Utilize ready to use presentation slides on Compensation And Benefits In Hrm Powerpoint Presentation Slide with all sorts of editable templates, charts and graphs, overviews, analysis templates. It is usable for marking important decisions and covering critical issues. Display and present all possible kinds of underlying nuances, progress factors for an all inclusive presentation for the teams. This presentation deck can be used by all professionals, managers, individuals, internal external teams involved in any company organization.
The presentation comprised the strategy to improve employee performances through compensation and benefit. The presentation also includes case study of FMCG industry.
Startups: Attracting and Retaining Talent (updated 3/6/13)Patrick Seaman
White Paper on attracting and retaining talent for your startup. Based on my own experiences in many startups and early stage companies. Topics include: Introduction 3
Insanity & Genius 4
Founders & a Whiteboard 5
Wearing Many Hats 7
First Hires 9
Prototype 10
Beta 11
Pre-Launch 12
Launch / A-Round 13
State of the Team 14
Growing and Growing 15
Startups are Nimble 16
Startups –vs- Corporate Culture 17
Networking 20
Referral Incentives 21
Events 22
Interns & College/Universities 24
Compelling? 26
Who works for a Startup? 27
Early Employees 28
Poaching? 29
Location & Recruiting 31
Flex 32
Compensation 33
Options Value 34
Compensation Plans 35
Retention 36
The Simple Things 39
Family 41
Perks & Bennies 44
Change of Control 47
Flush with Cash 50
Or not 51
About the Author 52
About Pepperwood Partners 53
This presentation was given at "Hands-on Workshop for Negotiation Prowess" and geared towards women consultants and solopreneurs. We discussed ways to get over the fear of "No", negotiation frameworks, and experts scripts for making concessions and for raising your rate as a consultant.
How to Divide the Pie? Dynamic Equity Share by Mike Moyer Ed Kuiters
This is presentation held at the Tokyo Business Meetup on June 27th. Topic of the presentation; how to make sure that all particpants in a start-up get their fair share. Method by Mike Moyer - Slicing Pie
Raising Your Seed Round Financing: Should You Use Convertible Notes or Prefe...Bart Greenberg
This slide show outlines and discusses the basic differences between preferred stock and convertible notes and the pros and cons to the issuer and the investor in using one over the other.
158ltd.com gives a rapid introduction to NoSQL databases: where they came from, the nature of the data models they use, and the different way you have to think about consistency.
Most business leaders struggle with their incentive plans. What kind of results should they reward? Who should receive them? How will the incentives be "paid for?" And finally, what is the right balance is between short and long-term value-sharing? Although there is no silver bullet answer to these questions for every company, there are guiding principles businesses should follow if they want their incentive plans to help drive the performance they seek. If you find yourself grappling with these issues, you will not want to miss this presentation! http://www.vladvisors.com/compensation-knowledge-center/webinars/how-to-balance-short-and-long-term-incentives
As an enterprise leader, you want to cultivate highly productive performers in your workforce. Your business growth depends upon it. And so you search for rewards strategies that will drive the kind of productivity and performance you need. However, you do so with some skepticism—wondering if pay really has any bearing on the results you achieve. Some things you read suggest it doesn’t, but your business intuition tells you that pay, productivity and performance are (or at least should be) linked. But how? The approaches you’ve tried in the past haven't exactly “worked.” So, you grapple with what to do next. If this is an issue you face, you will not want to miss this.
How do you shift your employees from an entitlement to a stewardship mentality where your people take ownership of outcomes and results? If your company’s culture is showing symptoms of the entitlement “syndrome,” you will not want to miss this.
View a recording of the presentation here: https://www.vladvisors.com/compensation-knowledge-center/webinars/how-to-transform-entitlement-into-stewardship-2018
Ever get questions like these from your employees?
Why is my bonus less this year than last year? Why was my raise not higher? Why are you not paying me as much as salary.com says you should be paying me? Why can’t I have stock? Why…
You get the picture. Questions like these can put you on the defensive and strain your relationship with your employees. Worse, they evidence you have created a culture of entitlement. Yikes!
To learn how to make questions like these go away and transition your employees from a sense of entitlement to one of stewardship, be sure to watch our on-demand broadcast. You will not want to miss it!
In this broadcast, you will learn:
How entitlement takes root and what you can do to prevent it.
How a clear compensation philosophy can make 90% of pay complaints go away.
How to use market pay data more effectively—and why it is less important than you (and your employee’s) think.
What it means to have a balanced pay strategy and why it will make your value proposition more compelling.
Why a Total Rewards approach is critical to creating a positive employee experience, and…
Why today’s talent trends make it essential your people have that positive employee experience.
How do you know whether your company’s pay strategy is successful? It’s a simple question but most company leaders struggle to find an adequate answer.
The reason the question is so difficult is because compensation is seldom considered a strategic issue. It’s considered a cost issue. Therefore, it is designed without the success measures most strategic initiatives carry.
So how do you determine a measure that best defines success when it comes to compensation? If you are struggling to determine whether your pay strategy is successful, you won’t want to miss this valuable presentation.
View the webinar recording online at: http://www.vladvisors.com/compensation-knowledge-center/webinars/what-is-a-successful-pay-strategy
If you are like most business leaders, your confidence in the economy is growing…but your company is not completely recovered from its COVID experience. It’s left you and your leadership feeling a bit numb. You may have had to cut salaries, freeze incentive plans and either furlough or let employees go. It’s been painful. (Our apologies for reminding you!)
Now you need to move forward with optimism but you can’t just pretend nothing has happened, right?
All of this leaves you feeling uncertain about what your pay strategy should look like in 2021. Questions abound: How can you reward employee performance but not make your cash flow vulnerable? How can you create a pay offering that is more flexible without also unleashing compensation chaos? And so on.
If this is where you and your company find yourselves, you should watch this broadcast.
If you lead a business, you must treat your compensation plan as a strategic tool that can accelerate company growth. If you don’t, it can become a profit diluter and a drag on company performance.
With that in mind, we invite you to learn the 3 areas of strategic impact you should be having on your company’s pay design and development. We will discuss which compensation decisions only you should make and those that can be delegated to someone else.
As a prudent enterprise leader, you want your employees’ compensation tied to their performance. However, to accomplish that you must be able to distinguish the results your employees’ are producing from those driven by other factors (such as market conditions or shareholder investment).
So how do you do that? How do you ensure that you are rewarding performance and productivity actually attributable to your people?
This broadcast will address these and other important “pay for performance” questions. you will learn what high-performance companies do to ensure they are rewarding the right results. If you have been unsuccessful in your attempt to build such a plan for your business, you will not want to miss this event.
VisionLink has been building rewards strategies for over 20 years. Now we want to share our secrets with you. Join us to learn the four steps to effective pay design and why each is essential.
The Role of Rewards in the “New Age” of Employee Empowerment. So where does compensation fit in this new engagement environment? Does it play any role? Some analysis suggests its impact is minimal. Other studies indicate it is a larger factor. To the extent attrition can be considered the antithesis of engagement, one might be confused by what seems to be conflicting data analyses among researchers regarding the influence compensation has on this much sought after quality in employees. If these are questions you are trying to answer, you should not miss this presentation.
What if the employee incentive plan you offer didn’t really cost your company anything? How much value would you share? In theory, if it didn’t really cost you anything, the amount you could share would be unlimited, right? So, what’s the catch? Is there actually such a thing as incentive compensation that pays for itself?
There really is no catch. You could start a self-financing incentive plan today if you just knew the steps to take. And that’s the purpose of this webinar. We want to teach you how to reward performance in a way that drives a positive ROI on your compensation investment, and eliminates the “cost” associated with traditional approaches. So, stop wasting money on incentive plans that are a drain on cash flow and profits.
Is Pay Hindering Your Company’s Performance?
A culture of performance is one where success patterns have taken root throughout an organization. The company is winning and you see it manifest in every part of the business. However, for too many companies, the culture is not “firing on all cylinders.” Performance is lagging. As a result, breakthrough growth remains out of reach.
Pay can either drive or inhibit the success patterns that fuel business growth. If your company’s rewards strategy is hindering more than enabling a performance culture, you will not want to miss this presenation
Have you struggled to find a pay strategy that actually drives higher performance?
Well, it doesn’t have to be a mystery. Learn what high performance companies do to develop high performance rewards strategies. Turn Your Compensation Cost into an Investment in Business Growth!
View the recorded presentation on VisionLink's website: https://www.vladvisors.com/compensation-knowledge-center/webinars/5-keys-to-building-a-high-performance-pay-strategy-in-2018
How to build a pay strategy that performs the way you want it to.
Do you want to ensure your pay strategy will succeed—that it will do the job you’ve “hired” it to do?
If so, you must learn the process that compensation experts use. It includes four phases of planning. If followed, you will end up with a compensation offering capable of attracting premier talent and turning your employees into growth partners.
VisionLink has been building rewards strategies for over 20 years. Now we want to share our secrets with you. Join us to learn the four steps to effective pay design and why each is essential.
Underwhelming Pay Strategy = Underwhelming Results
If I'm a CEO, I need my employees to draw the same conclusion I do about "what's important." And I want them to behave in a way that reflects that understanding and commitment. To accomplish that there must be alignment between the growth goals of the company, its business model and strategy, roles and expectations and financial rewards. So how do you create that line of sight and instill a sense of stewardship among employees through compensation? If these are issues you struggle with, you will not want to miss this presentation!
By: The VisionLink Advisory Group. A consulting firm that helps growth-oriented companies create greater alignment between their business plans and their rewards programs—thereby creating a unified financial vision for growing their companies.
If you lead a business, perhaps you’ve had to deal with questions like these: “Why is my bonus less than it was last year?” “Why didn’t I get a bigger salary increase?” “Can I have stock?” All are indicators your employees are feeling a bit entitled.
So, how does this happen? More important, what can you do about it? How can you transform a culture of entitlement into one focused on value creation and engagement?
How do you determine the right blend of salaries and incentives in your pay strategy? Some believe that paying higher salaries attracts the best people, and therefore improves company performance. Others believe employee earnings should be tied to results, so they emphasize variable pay. So, is one right and the other wrong?
Obviously, there is no universal “right” way to pay employees. Instead, you must find what works best for your organization. So, how do you do that?
That is the question this webinar plans to answer. We will discuss 3 principles for determining the right rewards balance for your company and how they can be used to resolve the higher salary versus bigger incentives dilemma.
For most companies, compensation is the costliest item on the P&L. And yet business leaders typically know little about their organization’s pay strategy. In today’s hyper competitive world, that’s not okay. Pay is a strategic tool that can either drive or diminish company profitability. It is a key to recruiting the kind of talent that can positively impact the trajectory of the business. Therefore, chief executives need to play a leading role in charting the compensation course their companies take. But, to do that effectively, they must become better informed about core pay issues. But which issues? What, exactly, do they need to know?
This webinar will answer those questions. It is designed for enterprise leaders who want to learn how compensation can play a more productive role in their businesses.
Chances are, you think differently about compensation now than you did a few months ago. Let’s face it, COVID-19 made us think differently about a lot of things, did it not? And although you’ve survived the crisis so far, you recognize your pay strategy going forward probably needs to change.
But change how? Exactly what should be different?
This broadcast was created to help you answer that question. We recognize business leaders like you are struggling to determine how you can effectively reward performance in the new economy without creating the same financial vulnerabilities you’ve just lived through. We can think we can help.
How to Determine if Your Pay Strategy Needs Professional Help. Compensation planning is not your core competency. Leading a business is. So is it time to stop putting your pay investment at risk and getting experts involved? In this presentation, we’ll show you seven ways you can tell.
View a recording of the presentation: https://www.vladvisors.com/compensation-knowledge-center/webinars/7-signs-you-need-a-compensation-consultant
The economic chaos caused by the coronavirus pandemic is likely causing you to examine every financial element of your business right now. And because compensation is the biggest line item on your P&L, that number blares at you like a neon sign these days. All logic tells you it needs to shrink--and quickly.
As a result, you're wondering what your pay strategy should look like for the foreseeable future. Now, more than ever, your approach to compensation needs to be tied to performance--which means it is linked to results. If that's true, what should those results be and how do you make sure your pay plan effectively rewards them?
Similar to Guaranteed vs Incentive Pay - What's the Right Balance? (20)
When economic conditions are in constant motion, is it even possible to determine the “right” pay strategy?
For example, some company leaders believe high salaries are necessary to attract great people, but are concerned about having costly pay commitments if the economy is shut down again. Others think employee earnings should be tied heavily to performance, but wonder what metrics to use—and how to balance short versus long-term rewards. So, is one right and the other wrong?
The reality is there is no playbook for determining how to pay employees amid the kind of economic uncertainly we have been experiencing. So, what should you do?
This broadcast will help you answer that question. You will learn how to use compensation as a strategic tool and construct a rewards approach that is agile enough for changing conditions but enduring enough to work in any economy. We will, in fact, show you how to resolve the “higher salary versus bigger incentives” dilemma.
The COVID economy has likely caused you to rethink your compensation approach and forced you to confront some difficult questions: Should incentive compensation play a larger or smaller role in your pay strategy going forward? What’s more important—rewards for short or long-term performance? Better yet, should you even be offering incentives at all given the current uncertainty in the business environment?
VisionLink and EBS would like to help you answer those questions. In this webcast, you will learn why incentive plans are more important than ever and how they should be engineered in a post-COVID business world. We will show how the right approach to value-sharing can help you succeed any economy and inspire a balanced result in your employees’ performance.
If there’s one thing that’s certain about the future it’s that nothing about the future is certain. That makes it hard to plan, does it not? Yet, to succeed in the new economy you must have a strategy—and soon. It’s urgent. So, what should you do?
Start with your employees. They will have a lot to do with whether your company’s future is successful or not. Consequently, the experience you provide must be envisioned in advance and delivered according to your plan. It must attract premier talent and ensure they will want to stay and perform. And it must enable your employees to easily buy into and support your vision for the future—so they will be as committed to the company’s success as you are.
So, what kind of experience will do that?
That is the issue we addressed in this broadcast.
You want your people to buy into your vision of the future. You want to attract and keep premier talent. You want your employees to adopt a stewardship mindset and “own” results. You want all stakeholders to feel they are a part of the company’s success. You also want all stakeholders equally invested in preventing mistakes that can set the company back.
You recognize that’s a tall order in the best of times. But in today’s chaotic business environment, the challenge is even greater. So, what should you do?
This broadcast was created to help you answer that question.
The COVID-19 economy changed everything, did it not? The future business environment is not going be the same as it was prior to the pandemic. As a result, your future company can’t be the same either. It will be facing unique challenges. But it also offers you unprecedented new opportunities.
As always, those who anticipate and prepare for that future will have the advantage.
To that end, watch the recorded presentation to learn five ways you can leverage your ability to succeed in the new economy. In this webinar, we will share high impact insights that will help your company thrive regardless of the conditions that lie ahead.
Employee performance management has been undergoing a revolution over the past few years. Highly structured, year-end appraisals are being eliminated. Instead, business leaders are adopting a forward-looking, flexible mentoring and coaching approach. The “new and improved” method is designed to help companies navigate the accelerated pace of change all businesses are experiencing.
So, how is this revolution impacting compensation? What kind of pay strategies are being used with this new performance management approach? How are successful business leaders ensuring their compensation plans offer maximum flexibility without creating a need for constant reinvention?
In this webinar, we will answer all those questions and more. You will discover how a rewards plan can be both agile and enduring—and why that combination is essential in the hyper-change environment we are living in.
Compensation is expensive. And if your pay investment is not managed properly, it can wreak havoc on your company’s cash flow. For many business leaders, that’s been a key learning from the coronavirus economy.
So, how do you solve that problem? What rewards plan allocation is best suited to your organization and most likely to produce the performance results you want?
In this webinar, we will answer both those questions. We will show you how to create a structure that ensures your compensation investment is effectively planned and managed—and generates a real return for the company. Not only that, we will introduce you to an online tool that helps you achieve that outcome simply—and for free.
Happily, our country is beginning to open for business again. So, what now?
While the economy won’t recover overnight, smart companies are starting to plan how their businesses will operate differently in the future, especially when it comes to compensation. Going forward, they want pay programs that won’t paralyze their cash flow or otherwise create the kind of financial strain their current plans have caused.
So, what’s the solution? How should your rewards approach in the future be different than has been previously? What emphasis should be given to guaranteed versus incentive compensation? What is the best way to align pay with results and what kind of performance should be rewarded? How do you make sure your compensation plan has the right balance of flexibility and stability? And what should you start doing now to prepare for success going forward?
Chances are, you’ve been hit hard by the coronavirus pandemic. Not the flu itself, hopefully. (God willing, you’ve steered clear of that contagion.) No, we’re talking about the economic hit. Its impact has been more far reaching and less discriminatory than the actual virus.
If Covid-19 has created an uncertain economic future for your company, we’d like to show you a way to effectively manage compensation in the face of the current chaos that also ensures your success when things rebound. We call this the “survive to thrive” strategy.
In this presentation you will learn a pay approach that is flexible and resilient enough for broad cash flow fluctuations but enduring enough to remain relevant when prosperous times return.
While the coronavirus has stalled business for many companies, some are experiencing a sudden spike in demand for their product or service. Perhaps yours is one of them. If so, you may find yourself “hiring in a hurry” to ensure you have enough talent to handle the sudden increase in interest, traffic and opportunity.
Given the urgency, the risk of mistake-making is high and can be costly—especially when it comes to extending pay offers. Compensation is an expensive proposition, so making promises in a hurry can be particularly hazardous. You don’t want to make commitments now you will regret later.
We can help you avoid that risk.
It is time to get rid of that bonus plan you have reinvented five times in the last six years. More metrics is not the answer. A different payout schedule isn’t going to change anything. You just need to let it go. Incentive plans have become unappreciated, ineffective and economically indefensible. In today’s business environment, your focus should be on value-sharing. To learn how to transition from paying incentives to sharing value—and why it matters—watch our on-demand broadcast.
Is there such a thing as a chief executive who is “satisfied” with the performance of his or her employees? Or, are there any who feel their company’s performance management system is “working?” And what about pay? Do you know anyone who feels good about the relationship between the incentive payments they are making and how their people are performing?
I’m guessing not.
So why is that? How can so many run successful businesses but not be able to figure out how to effectively manage the performance of their people and reward them in a way that drives more of the results they want?
The answer is because there are no rules. And the reason there are no rules is because every business is different.
So, what do you do?
Well, you will need to watch our on-demand webinar to learn the answer. (Sorry, it’s just how marketing works!) Discover the principles and practices successful companies use to drive, manage and reward superior employee performance.
Most business leaders want greater engagement from their employees. So, they hire consultants, go on retreats, survey their workforce, initiate team-building exercises and design one engagement strategy after another. And then…they become frustrated because they have little to show for their efforts.
The truth is, employee engagement is not as complicated as we make it. The problem is, in business, we want to solve everything with a strategy. But engagement isn’t the result of a clever strategy. Its development is organic. Therefore, the focus of business leaders should be on encouraging and accelerating its evolution—not on trying to manipulate it into existence.
What if the employee incentive plan you offer didn’t really cost your company anything? How much value would you share? In theory, if it didn’t really cost you anything, the amount you could share would be unlimited, right? So, what’s the catch? Is there actually such a thing as incentive compensation that pays for itself?
There really is no catch. You could start a self-financing incentive plan today if you just knew the steps to take. And that’s the purpose of this webinar. We want to teach you how to reward performance in a way that drives a positive ROI on your compensation investment, and eliminates the “cost” associated with traditional approaches. So, stop wasting money on incentive plans that are a drain on cash flow and profits.
As a private company leader, have you struggled with the idea of sharing stock? Do you find yourself conflicted because you want to reward your key people for improving business value, but prefer to do so without diluting owner equity? Do you find yourself without a good answer when some says: “Can I have stock in the company?” If so, you’re not alone.
This happens because you simply don’t know what options you have, right? If you don’t share equity, then what do you do instead? This webinar will solve that problem for you. There are six different ways to reward long-term value creation without giving away stock. In this broadcast, we will discuss each of them and teach you how to decide which one is right for your company.
Let’s face it, it is becoming harder and harder to attract the best talent. And without great people, you’ll never achieve a high-performance culture. As a result, your growth ambitions will be left unfulfilled. In short, it is critical to have an “irresistible” pay offer.
In this presentation, you will learn:
What a well-crafted pay philosophy should address and why it matters to the people you are trying to attract.
How to design a pay approach that appeals to the millennial employees you need to recruit.
Why a compensation strategy rooted in a value-sharing model is essential to an irresistible pay offer.
How top talent evaluates your compensation plan—and what they want it to help them achieve.
Why “how” you pay top producers is more important than “how much” you pay them.
How to create a rewards plan that offers unlimited earnings potential and pays for itself.
To watch the recording, visit https://www.vladvisors.com/webinars/the-3-parts-of-an-irresistible-pay-offer
It is time to get rid of that bonus plan you have reinvented five times in the last six years. More metrics is not the answer. A different payout schedule isn’t going to change anything. You just need to let it go. Incentive plans have become unappreciated, ineffective and economically indefensible. In today’s business environment, your focus should be on value-sharing.
To watch the recording, visit https://www.vladvisors.com/webinars/why-you-should-stop-paying-incentives
Finding and keeping great people has never been more important—or as competitive. As a result, once you’ve secured premier talent, the last thing you can afford to do is lose those employees. However, if your organization is like most, you are at risk of losing your key performers. There are four primary reasons your best people may be considering leaving and why a focus on greater employee engagement is so critical. To learn what they are—and how they might work for your business—be sure to view this broadcast.
VisionLink has been building rewards strategies for over 20 years. Now we want to share our secrets with you. Join us to learn the four steps to effective pay design and why each is essential.
As a business leader, at some point you will have to decide if you’re going to share stock. You likely favor the idea of rewarding long-term value creation but don’t like the idea of diluting shareholder equity. So, you wonder if there are other options. The good news is there are alternatives. View this recording to learn about them—and how they might work for your business.
VisionLink has been building rewards strategies for over 20 years. Now we want to share our secrets with you. Join us to learn the four steps to effective pay design and why each is essential.
Most business leaders are dissatisfied with the bonus plan their company offers. Why is that?
The reason they give is that their incentive plan just doesn’t “work.” But the core problem is they start with the wrong expectation. They want their plan to change employee behavior. Therefore, they build their bonus offering on a flawed premise. This becomes a costly issue because companies make huge investments in the performance awards they pay out. Having them not “work” is simply not acceptable. There is a better way—and we would like to teach it to you.
VisionLink has been building rewards strategies for over 20 years. Now we want to share our secrets with you. Join us to learn the four steps to effective pay design and why each is essential.
The case study discusses the potential of drone delivery and the challenges that need to be addressed before it becomes widespread.
Key takeaways:
Drone delivery is in its early stages: Amazon's trial in the UK demonstrates the potential for faster deliveries, but it's still limited by regulations and technology.
Regulations are a major hurdle: Safety concerns around drone collisions with airplanes and people have led to restrictions on flight height and location.
Other challenges exist: Who will use drone delivery the most? Is it cost-effective compared to traditional delivery trucks?
Discussion questions:
Managerial challenges: Integrating drones requires planning for new infrastructure, training staff, and navigating regulations. There are also marketing and recruitment considerations specific to this technology.
External forces vary by country: Regulations, consumer acceptance, and infrastructure all differ between countries.
Demographics matter: Younger generations might be more receptive to drone delivery, while older populations might have concerns.
Stakeholders for Amazon: Customers, regulators, aviation authorities, and competitors are all stakeholders. Regulators likely hold the greatest influence as they determine the feasibility of drone delivery.
Oprah Winfrey: A Leader in Media, Philanthropy, and Empowerment | CIO Women M...CIOWomenMagazine
This person is none other than Oprah Winfrey, a highly influential figure whose impact extends beyond television. This article will delve into the remarkable life and lasting legacy of Oprah. Her story serves as a reminder of the importance of perseverance, compassion, and firm determination.
The Team Member and Guest Experience - Lead and Take Care of your restaurant team. They are the people closest to and delivering Hospitality to your paying Guests!
Make the call, and we can assist you.
408-784-7371
Foodservice Consulting + Design
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to radically reinvent the way we do business. This study explores how CEOs and top decision makers around the world are responding to the transformative potential of AI.
Senior Project and Engineering Leader Jim Smith.pdfJim Smith
I am a Project and Engineering Leader with extensive experience as a Business Operations Leader, Technical Project Manager, Engineering Manager and Operations Experience for Domestic and International companies such as Electrolux, Carrier, and Deutz. I have developed new products using Stage Gate development/MS Project/JIRA, for the pro-duction of Medical Equipment, Large Commercial Refrigeration Systems, Appliances, HVAC, and Diesel engines.
My experience includes:
Managed customized engineered refrigeration system projects with high voltage power panels from quote to ship, coordinating actions between electrical engineering, mechanical design and application engineering, purchasing, production, test, quality assurance and field installation. Managed projects $25k to $1M per project; 4-8 per month. (Hussmann refrigeration)
Successfully developed the $15-20M yearly corporate capital strategy for manufacturing, with the Executive Team and key stakeholders. Created project scope and specifications, business case, ROI, managed project plans with key personnel for nine consumer product manufacturing and distribution sites; to support the company’s strategic sales plan.
Over 15 years of experience managing and developing cost improvement projects with key Stakeholders, site Manufacturing Engineers, Mechanical Engineers, Maintenance, and facility support personnel to optimize pro-duction operations, safety, EHS, and new product development. (BioLab, Deutz, Caire)
Experience working as a Technical Manager developing new products with chemical engineers and packaging engineers to enhance and reduce the cost of retail products. I have led the activities of multiple engineering groups with diverse backgrounds.
Great experience managing the product development of products which utilize complex electrical controls, high voltage power panels, product testing, and commissioning.
Created project scope, business case, ROI for multiple capital projects to support electrotechnical assembly and CPG goods. Identified project cost, risk, success criteria, and performed equipment qualifications. (Carrier, Electrolux, Biolab, Price, Hussmann)
Created detailed projects plans using MS Project, Gant charts in excel, and updated new product development in Jira for stakeholders and project team members including critical path.
Great knowledge of ISO9001, NFPA, OSHA regulations.
User level knowledge of MRP/SAP, MS Project, Powerpoint, Visio, Mastercontrol, JIRA, Power BI and Tableau.
I appreciate your consideration, and look forward to discussing this role with you, and how I can lead your company’s growth and profitability. I can be contacted via LinkedIn via phone or E Mail.
Jim Smith
678-993-7195
jimsmith30024@gmail.com
2. Vision: HelpYou Become a
Wealth Multiplier Organization
Transform the way you use
compensation to share value with
employees.
3. If you do that…
• Quality of talent will improve.
• Employee engagement will expand.
• Performance will be magnified.
• Business growth will be accelerated.
• Shareholder value will increase.
4. 44
Governing Thought
Pay the least amount you can
“get away with” to attract the
best talent available and drive
the maximum performance
possible.
5. 55
Questions
Pay higher salaries and price out the
competition?
Competitive salary but higher upside?
A blend of those approaches?
7. 77
Technology Company
10Years-Old
Grown from $50 to $75
million in revenue over past
three years
Wants to grow to $125
million over next three years
High Attrition
Privately Owned
8. 88
Transportation Company
18 Years-Old
$45 million in annual
revenue, unstable growth
(averaged 3% over past 5
years)
Wants to grow to $75 in the
next five years
Low Attrition
Family Owned: Two sons
working in the business, no
formal succession plan
9. 99
Manufacturing Company
20 Years Old
$150 million in
annual revenue—up
from $75 million
three years ago
Plans to grow to
$200 million in the
next three years
Modest Attrition
Privately Owned:
New CEO hired by
owner three years
ago
11. 1111
Balancing Pay: Five Key Practices
1. Define value creation.
2. Establish a clear pay philosophy.
3. Replace “incentives” with value
sharing.
4. Focus on play plan alignment.
5. Build a Total Compensation
Structure.
12. 1212
1. Define Value Creation
Value attributable
to the productivity
and performance of
human capital.
14. 1414
Keith Williams Assumed leadership of
UL in 2005
Company carrying
considerable debt
Losing market share
Low employee morale
UL had become
bureaucratic and “siloed”
15. 1515
Core Changes Shift from “Incentives” to
“Value Sharing”
Took away local measurements
driving management incentive
plans—all paid on same metrics
“We live together and we die
together”
Aligned everyone behind
company success
“I call it ‘pay the company first.’ ”
16. 1616
Pay the Company First
“Basically, up to the
company’s operating
profit target, all of the
profits go to the
company; and only after
that target is met, do we
start funding the
incentive pool.”
Example: If UL’s target is
$80 million--
100% of first $80 in
profit goes to company
The next $20 million
goes to the incentive
pool
From there on, 50/50
between company &
incentive pool
17. 1717
Pay the Company First
Once value creation is defined,
compensation can follow a formula
for sharing value in a way that
aligns key producers with the
company’s business plan and
priorities.
18. 1818
2. Establish a Clear Pay Philosophy
A written statement of what the
company is willing to “pay for.”
Tie it to value creation.
19. 1919
Compensation Philosophy Statement
How value creation is defined.
How value is shared—and with
whom.
Market pay standards.
How guaranteed pay and value-
sharing will be balanced.
How short and long-term value-
sharing will be balanced.
When or if equity will be shared.
How merit pay is defined.
20. 2020
Spell it Out
Value creation occurs
beyond an appropriate
return on shareholder
capital (12%).
We believe value should
be shared with those who
help create it.
We believe value-sharing
should be split 50/50 in
rewarding short-term and
long-term performance
We believe in being at the
45-50th percentile with
guaranteed pay but in
providing unlimited
upside earnings through
value-sharing
22. 2222
Old School
People Are Lucky to Have a Job
Philosophy Pay the least you can to get the work done.
Cost or Investment? Every dollar spent on pay is one dollar less in profits.
Salaries Check the market; pay less if we can get away with it.
Bonuses Maybe; let's wait and see if we have a good year.
Long-term Incentives
(quasi-equity)
Are you crazy?
Results
If you have a business with sustainable cash flow and it doesn't
require innovative employees or much customer interaction,
this can work…but won’t attract or retain premier talent.
23. 2323
Defensive
Don’t Rock the Boat
Philosophy We want to pay people well, but we have to be very cautious.
Cost or Investment? We need to be very careful to control costs--including pay.
Salaries We want to be "at market." Keep searching for it.
Bonuses We will try to pay bonuses as long as we can afford them.
Long-term Incentives
(quasi-equity)
Not our cup of tea. Seems expensive and unnecessary.
Results
If you want employees who are cautious about bringing up pay
issues . . . and accept that pay should never go lower but rarely
should go higher, this is the approach for you.
24. 2424
Wealth Creation
Let’s Focus on Performance
Philosophy
Pay strong salaries and incentives to enable the company to
attract great talent. We are willing to pay "above market" for
top performers.
Cost or Investment?
We see compensation as an investment that should produce a
positive return for shareholders.
Salaries
Salaries should be "at market" for most positions but
somewhat above for high value positions.
Bonuses
Bonuses are set and communicated early in the year; they are
expressed as a meaningful percentage of salaries.
Long-term Incentives
(quasi-equity)
May play a small role.
Results
If you want to focus on aligning employee performance and
pay with your crucial budgeted goals, consider this approach.
25. 2525
Wealth Multiplier
Let’s Secure Growth Partners
Philosophy
Share economic value. "If you create financial value, you will
participate in a generous portion of it."
Cost or Investment?
Compensation is allocated to produce the highest possible
return for both shareholders and contributing employees.
Salaries
We use data for benchmarking, but our pay philosophy drives
where we want to be vis a vis market pay.
Bonuses
Bonuses (value sharing plans) are tied to crucial metrics,
recognize personal contributions, and are not capped.
Long-term Incentives
(quasi-equity)
Viewed by top performers as the most meaningful part of their
rewards program.
Results
If you want to be able to attract and retain the best talent in
your industry and have them adopt a stewardship mindset
regarding shareholder goals, this is your system.
26. 2626
3. Replace “Incentives” with
Value Sharing
Incentives imply a
“carrot and stick”
approach while value-
sharing is about
reinforcing outcomes
and forging a financial
partnership.
27. 2727
Force Reinforce
This is the behavior that’s
expected and rewarded.
These are the results that are
valued and rewarded.
Do these things whether you like
them or not (they’re a necessary
part of the job).
Assume stewardship for the
outcomes we’re striving for,
determine the best ways to get
them done. Here are our
standards, patterns, expectations.
Our bonuses are reflective of our
“market pay” analysis for your job
classification
Our bonuses reflect the way we
share value that you help create.
Bad profits Good profits
28. 2828
Productivity Profit
Capital Account
Cost of Capital
$ 20,000,000
ROTRI™
Total Rewards Investment
Operating Income
Capital Charge
Productivity Profit
30.4%
$ 25,000,000
$ 7,600,000
$ 10,000,000
12%
$ 2,400,000
(ROTRI™ = Productivity Profit/Total Rewards Investment)
29. 2929
Self-Financing
Capital Account
Cost of Capital
$ 20,000,000
ROTRI™
Total Rewards Investment
Operating Income
Capital Charge
*Productivity Profit
30.4%
$ 25,000,000
$ 7,600,000
$ 10,000,000
12%
$ 2,400,000
*Variable Pay Plans (Value Sharing) are financed
from Productivity Profit
30. 3030
Shareholder Value
Current EquityValue EOY
10% GR
(Threshold) 11% GR 12% GR 13% GR 14% GR 15% GR
25,000,000 1 27,500,000 27,750,000
28,000,000 28,250,000 28,500,000
28,750,000
15 104,431,204 119,614,737
136,839,144
156,356,759
178,448,449 203,426,541
Incremental
increase in
value
15,183,533 17,224,407 19,517,615
22,091,690 24,978,091
CumValue
Increase
Above
Threshold
15,183,533
32,407,940
51,925,555 74,017,245
98,995,336
% Shared 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
$ Shared 1,518,353 4,861,191 10,385,111 18,504,311
29,698,601
Net
Increase for
SH
13,665,180 27,546,749
41,540,444
55,512,934
69,296,736
New SH
Value
118,096,384 131,977,953
145,971,648 159,944,138
173,727,940
IRR 10.9% 11.7% 12.5% 13.2% 13.8%
33. 33
Profit
Based
Allocation
(PBA)
Targeted
KPI’s
(TKPI)
A percentage of
annual profits awarded
to employees
The award amount
is divided among
employees based on a
pre-determined formula
Paid at year-end
Employees assigned
a “targeted” incentive
value – often based
on a percentage of salary
Achievement of award is tied to
multiple specific measurements
or “metrics.” Metrics
can vary person to person.
Typically paid at year end,
but may be quarterly.
40. 4040
Select the Right Plan Type
Stock Option
Performance Shares
Restricted Stock
Phantom Stock
Option
Performance
Phantom Stock
Phantom Stock
Profit Pool
Performance Unit
Strategic Deferred
Compensation
41. 4141
Grant Equity or
Not Equity?
Full Value or
Appreciation Only?
Yes
Appreciation
Stock Option
Full Value
Performance Based?
Yes
Performance Shares
No
Restricted Stock
No
Reward for Value
Increase or Financial
Performance?
Value Increase
Full Value or
Appreciation?
Appreciation
Phantom Stock
Option
Full Value
Performance Based?
Yes
Performance
Phantom Stock
No
Phantom Stock
Financial
Performance
Appreciation-
Performance Based or
Employee Directed?
Performance
Based Reward for
Profit/Cash Flow or
Other Metrics?
Profits
Allocation or
Objectives Based?
Allocation
Profit Pool
ObjectivesOther Metrics
Performance Unit
Employee Directed
Strategic Deferred
Compensation
45. 4545
Eight Components of Pay
Benefits
Core benefits
Executive benefits
Qualified retirement plans
Supplemental retirement plans
Compensation
Salary
Performance incentives
Sales incentives
Growth incentives
Incentives should be in the form of value sharing.
46. 4646
Salary
Performance
Incentives
Sales
Incentives
Growth
Incentives
Core Health
& Welfare
Plans
Executive
Benefit
Plans
Qualified
Retirement
Plans
Nonqualified
Retirement
Plans
Salaries
Competitive with market standards?
Tied to strong performance management process (merit)?
Managed within a flexible but effective structure?
Performance Incentives
Tied to productivity gains?
Clear, achievable and meaningful?
Self-financing?
Sales Incentives
Challenging yet achievable?
Reinforcing the right behaviors?
Differentiating your offering?
Growth Incentives
Linked to a compelling future?
Supporting an ownership mentality?
Securing premier talent?
Core Benefits
Responsive to today’s employee marketplace?
Allocating resources where most needed?
Evaluated to eliminate unnecessary expense?
Executive Benefits
Flexible enough to address varying circumstances?
Communicating a unique relationship?
Reducing employee tax expense?
Qualified Retirement Plans
Giving employees an opportunity to optimize retirement values?
Operated with comprehensive fiduciary accountability?
Avoiding conflicts and minimizing expenses?
Nonqualified Retirement Plans
Optimizing tax-deferral opportunities?
Aligning long-term interests of employees with shareholders?
Structured to receive best possible P&L impact?
An Aligned
Compensation
Strategy
47. 4747
Form of Pay Purpose Standard Investment ROI
Salaries
Provide for the current cash needs
of our executives
40-50th percentile for
peer group
$500,000
Achieve ROA standard
of 0.75%
Short-term Incentives
Enhance current cash payments to
executives for achieving top and
bottom line annual goals
30-40% of base salary $168,000 (Target)
15% revenue growth
and 12% margin
Long-term Incentives
(Cash)
Retain execs; focus them on long-
term earnings growth; align with
shareholder interests; meet wealth
accumulation needs
15-20% of base salary $84,000 (Target)
Long-term growth in
earnings (double
earnings = share 13%
of new value)
Long-term Incentives
(Equity)
Retain execs; focus them on long-
term earnings growth; align with
shareholder interests; meet wealth
accumulation needs
15-20% of base salary $84,000 (Target)
Long-term growth in
earnings (double
earnings = share 13%
of new value)
Core Benefits
Meet basic security needs of the
executives
50th percentile for peer
group
$25,500 ROA of 0.75%
Executive Benefits
Enhance basic security needs and
meet market standards for
perquisites
50th percentile for peer
group
$24,000 ROA of 0.75%
Qualified Retirement
Provide wealth accumulation
opportunity for executives
40th percentile (3% of
salary)
$15,000 ROA of 0.75%
Supplemental
Retirement
Strengthen rewards value
proposition to help recruit and
retain executives; meet wealth
accumulation needs
30th percentile
compared to banks that
have plans
$135,000 ROA of 0.9%
48. 4848
5. Build a Total Compensation Structure
A total compensation structure gives you a comprehensive view of all
compensation and benefit plans and ensures operational integrity.
49. 4949
Structure the Data
There are four common ways
to build a salary structure
Pure Market Pricing Approach
Traditional Salary Structure
Broadband Structure
Hybrid Structure
49
50. 5050
Market Pay Assessment
Benchmark your roles against salary surveys
Major House Surveys
Industry Surveys
Internet Surveys
25th Med 75th
Towers Watson Accountant 1 11.1% 47.0 52.5 58.0
Mercer Accountant - Entry 11.1% 50.0 52.5 55.0
Radford Accountant I 10.0% 11.1% 55.0 59.4 63.8
Salary.com Accountant 11.1% 45.0 51.5 58.0
ERI Accounting - Junior 11.1% 48.0 54.0 60.0
Kenexa Accountant Entry 11.1% 45.0 50.0 55.0
BDG Accountant 11.1% 50.0 52.5 55.0
Pay Scale Associate Accountant 11.1% 50.0 54.5 65.3
Robert Half Accountant I -10.0% 11.1% 50.1 56.0 61.9
Average 100.0% 48.9 53.7 59.1
Accountant 1 51.4
Position Survey Match
Average
Salary
SalaryPremium
Discount Weighting
52. 5252
Creating a Balance
Total Compensation Structure
Name Title/Position Tier Salary
Short-term
Incentive
Target
Long-term
Incentive
Target
Total Direct
Comp
H&W
Annual
Value
QRP
Annual
Value
Security
Plans Annual
Value
Total
Indirect
Comp TRI
Jason Smith CEO 1 $ 300,000 $ 120,000 $ - $ 420,000 $ 18,200 $ 8,000 $ - $ 26,200 $ 446,200
Lucy Jones VP Marketing 2 $ 210,000 $ 45,000 $ - $ 255,000 $ 16,200 $ 7,000 $ - $ 23,200 $ 278,200
Rick Miller VP Sales 2 $ 160,000 $ 85,000 $ - $ 245,000 $ 9,200 $ 6,000 $ - $ 15,200 $ 260,200
Janice Johnson CFO 2 $ 195,000 $ 40,000 $ - $ 235,000 $ 10,200 $ 5,000 $ - $ 15,200 $ 250,200
Maria York Director 3 $ 160,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ 170,000 $ 12,200 $ 4,000 $ - $ 16,200 $ 186,200
Frank North Director 3 $ 150,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ 160,000 $ 11,200 $ 3,000 $ - $ 14,200 $ 174,200
Ricardo South Director 3 $ 140,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ 150,000 $ 7,700 $ 2,000 $ - $ 9,700 $ 59,700
Simon Lewis Director 3 $ 130,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ 140,000 $ 8,700 $ 2,500 $ - $ 11,200 $ 151,200
$ 1,445,000 $ 330,000 $ - $ 1,775,000 $ 93,600 $ 37,500 $ - $ 131,100 $ 1,906,100
How are
these values
determined?
Why no LTI
to balance
the STI?
Should we be
addressing
these needs?
53. 5353
What Does It Tell You?
Total Rewards Investment (TRI) Allocation
TRI looks at each component of pay as a percentage of the total
Name Tier Salary STI% LTI% H&W% QRP% SP% TRI
Jason Smith 1 67.2% 26.9% 0.0% 4.1% 1.8% 0.0% $ 446,200
Lucy Jones 2 75.5% 21.4% 0.0% 7.7% 3.3% 0.0% $ 278,200
Rick Miller 2 61.5% 53.1% 0.0% 5.8% 3.8% 0.0% $ 260,200
Janice Johnson 2 77.9% 20.5% 0.0% 5.2% 2.6% 0.0% $ 250,200
Maria York 3 85.9% 6.3% 0.0% 7.6% 2.5% 0.0% $ 186,200
Frank North 3 86.1% 6.7% 0.0% 7.5% 2.0% 0.0% $ 174,200
Ricardo South 3 87.7% 7.1% 0.0% 5.5% 1.4% 0.0% $ 159,700
Simon Lewis 3 86.0% 7.7% 0.0% 6.7% 1.9% 0.0% $ 151,200
Salary STI% LTI% H&W% QRP% SI%
54. 5454
Balanced Structure
Total Compensation Structure
Name Title/Position Tier Salary
Short-term
Incentive
Target
Long-term
Incentive
Target
Total Direct
Comp
H&W
Annual
Value
QRP
Annual
Value
Security
Plans Annual
Value
Total
Indirect
Comp TRI
Jason Smith CEO 1 $ 300,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 450,000 $ 18,200 $ 8,000 $ 15,000 $ 41,200 $ 491,200
Lucy Jones VP Marketing 2 $ 210,000 $ 36,750 $ 36,750 $ 283,500 $ 16,200 $ 7,000 $ 10,500 $ 33,700 $ 317,200
Rick Miller VP Sales 2 $ 160,000 $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 260,000 $ 9,200 $ 6,000 $ 8,000 $ 23,200 $ 83,200
Janice Johnson CFO 2 $ 95,000 $ 34,125 $ 34,125 $ 263,250 $ 10,200 $ 5,000 $ 9,750 $ 24,950 $ 288,200
Maria York Director 3 $ 160,000 $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 192,000 $ 12,200 $ 4,000 $ 8,000 $ 24,200 $ 216,200
Frank North Director 3 $ 50,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 180,000 $ 1,200 $ 3,000 $ 7,500 $ 21,700 $ 201,700
Ricardo South Director 3 $ 140,000 $ 14,000 $ 14,000 $ 168,000 $ 7,700 $ 2,000 $ 7,000 $ 16,700 $ 184,700
Simon Lewis Director 3 $ 30,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 156,000 $ 8,700 $ 2,500 $ 6,500 $ 17,700 $ 173,700
$ 1,445,000 $ 263,875 $ 243,875 $ 1,952,750 $ 93,600 $ 37,500 $ 72,250 $ 203,350 $ 2,156,100
We’ve
reduced the
STI targets.
But we’ve
balanced with a
LTIP (wealth
creation).
This can
strengthen
partnership and
improve retention.
55. 5555
A balanced approach will typically appeal to premier
talent who hold a long-term view .
Total Rewards Investment (TRI) Allocation
TRI looks at each component of pay as a percentage of the total
Name Tier Salary STI% LTI% H&W% QRP% SP% TRI
Jason Smith 1 61.1% 15.3% 15.3% 3.7% 1.6% 3.1% $ 491,200
Lucy Jones 2 66.2% 17.5% 17.5% 7.7% 3.3% 5.0% $ 317,200
Rick Miller 2 56.5% 37.5% 25.0% 5.8% 3.8% 5.0% $ 283,200
Janice Johnson 2 67.7% 17.5% 17.5% 5.2% 2.6% 5.0% $ 288,200
Maria York 3 74.0% 10.0% 10.0% 7.6% 2.5% 5.0% $ 216,200
Frank North 3 74.4% 10.0% 10.0% 7.5% 2.0% 5.0% $ 201,700
Ricardo South 3 75.8% 10.0% 10.0% 5.5% 1.4% 5.0% $ 184,700
Simon Lewis 3 74.8% 10.0% 10.0% 6.7% 1.9% 5.0% $ 173,700
Salary STI% LTI% H&W% QRP% SI%
56. 5656
Is there one right solution for all three
companies?
Company A Company B Company C
10Year-Old Technology Company 18Year-OldTransportation
Company
20Year-Old Manufacturing
Company
Grown from $50 to $75 million in
revenue over past three years
$45 million in annual revenue,
unstable growth (averaged 3%
over past 5 years)
$150 million in annual revenue—
up from $75 million three years
ago
Wants to grow to $125 million
over next three years
Wants to grow to $75 in the next
five years
Plans to grow to $200 million in
the next three years
High Attrition LowAttrition ModestAttrition
Privately Owned Family Owned:Two sons working
in the business
Privately Owned: New CEO hired
by owner three years ago