James Cameron Masterclass | Purpose Studios.pdfPurposeStudios
Academy Award–winning director James Cameron, in his masterclass teaches us the nuances of filmmaking - from lighting to characterisation, a must-read for every aspiring filmmaker.
Cisa domain 2 part 3 governance and management of itShivamSharma909
The process of identifying vulnerabilities and threats to the information resources used by an organization in achieving business objectives and what countermeasures to take in reducing risk to an acceptable level.
Data Visualizations in Digital Products (ProductCamp Boston 2016)ProductCamp Boston
Visualizations around fixed datasets such as data journalism are very common, you see them in the New York Times every day, but what happens when data visualization is part of a digital product? These visualizations contain data that changes frequently based on user inputs or other sources. This talk covers examples and an approach on how to incorporate data visualization into your digital product, whether it be mobile, web or desktop.
About C. Todd Lombardo
C. Todd recently joined the team at Fresh Tilled Soil as Chief Design Strategist, helping clients solve product, design, and/or strategy problems. He has a Master’s Degree in Data Visualization from Maryland Institute College of Art.
His background is grounded in science, engineering, and design. He previously was Innovation Architect at Constant Contact’s InnoLoft, he facilitated product and service design sprints for a wide range of external startups and internal product teams. He is also a member of the adjunct faculty at Madrid’s prestigious IE Business School.
A teacher and speaker at heart, he frequently speaks at conferences and has directed five TEDx events in two countries. His book, Design Sprint was published by O’Reilly Media in the fall of 2015.
James Cameron Masterclass | Purpose Studios.pdfPurposeStudios
Academy Award–winning director James Cameron, in his masterclass teaches us the nuances of filmmaking - from lighting to characterisation, a must-read for every aspiring filmmaker.
Cisa domain 2 part 3 governance and management of itShivamSharma909
The process of identifying vulnerabilities and threats to the information resources used by an organization in achieving business objectives and what countermeasures to take in reducing risk to an acceptable level.
Data Visualizations in Digital Products (ProductCamp Boston 2016)ProductCamp Boston
Visualizations around fixed datasets such as data journalism are very common, you see them in the New York Times every day, but what happens when data visualization is part of a digital product? These visualizations contain data that changes frequently based on user inputs or other sources. This talk covers examples and an approach on how to incorporate data visualization into your digital product, whether it be mobile, web or desktop.
About C. Todd Lombardo
C. Todd recently joined the team at Fresh Tilled Soil as Chief Design Strategist, helping clients solve product, design, and/or strategy problems. He has a Master’s Degree in Data Visualization from Maryland Institute College of Art.
His background is grounded in science, engineering, and design. He previously was Innovation Architect at Constant Contact’s InnoLoft, he facilitated product and service design sprints for a wide range of external startups and internal product teams. He is also a member of the adjunct faculty at Madrid’s prestigious IE Business School.
A teacher and speaker at heart, he frequently speaks at conferences and has directed five TEDx events in two countries. His book, Design Sprint was published by O’Reilly Media in the fall of 2015.
This is a presentation about the introduction to system and analysis design. The topic talks about what are the system development life cycle and how it works. It also talks about the professions or the team conducting a study.
Part 1 of this two-part serious was about rethinking and reeducation: ‘Attack Scenarios’ approached the transformation process by getting students to think as if they are attacker so that in Part 2; ‘Defence Scenarios’ they are challenged to get ahead of the game; to anticipate and respond ahead of an attack, by recalling what they did in RED Team mode which gave them the opportunity to design their own criminal empire on screen!
In both Part 1 and Part 2 the detailed discussions occurred in camera and are not for publication or open public access.
Our communications history is dominated by fixed networks of bounded linear predictability. These were based on precise engineering design giving assured information security, and measured operation. However, mobile devices, internet, social networks, IP, and Apps changed all that! Internets are inherently non-linear, unbounded, and essentially designoid — that is, mostly shaped by evolution, steered by demand/rapid innovation - highly adaptive and ‘learning’ in real time.
So, those who suppose we can control such networks to fully guard and protect the information of institutions and individuals are sadly mistaken. And further confounded by Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things (IoT). Here, a mix of the information of individuals and things, is distributed across the planet on a scale far larger than ever conceived in the past, to become essential components in the survival of our species in realising sustainable societies.
Not surprising then, Privacy and Data protection are big issues for regulators, governments and civil liberties organisations. But so far, nothing has worked, and we see the UK Data Protection Act, EU-GDPR, EU-USA Shield, and Copyright Laws often ignored or worked around. These are largely derivatives of a paper based world and a pre-computing world are now largely unfit for purpose.
This is a presentation about the introduction to system and analysis design. The topic talks about what are the system development life cycle and how it works. It also talks about the professions or the team conducting a study.
Part 1 of this two-part serious was about rethinking and reeducation: ‘Attack Scenarios’ approached the transformation process by getting students to think as if they are attacker so that in Part 2; ‘Defence Scenarios’ they are challenged to get ahead of the game; to anticipate and respond ahead of an attack, by recalling what they did in RED Team mode which gave them the opportunity to design their own criminal empire on screen!
In both Part 1 and Part 2 the detailed discussions occurred in camera and are not for publication or open public access.
Our communications history is dominated by fixed networks of bounded linear predictability. These were based on precise engineering design giving assured information security, and measured operation. However, mobile devices, internet, social networks, IP, and Apps changed all that! Internets are inherently non-linear, unbounded, and essentially designoid — that is, mostly shaped by evolution, steered by demand/rapid innovation - highly adaptive and ‘learning’ in real time.
So, those who suppose we can control such networks to fully guard and protect the information of institutions and individuals are sadly mistaken. And further confounded by Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things (IoT). Here, a mix of the information of individuals and things, is distributed across the planet on a scale far larger than ever conceived in the past, to become essential components in the survival of our species in realising sustainable societies.
Not surprising then, Privacy and Data protection are big issues for regulators, governments and civil liberties organisations. But so far, nothing has worked, and we see the UK Data Protection Act, EU-GDPR, EU-USA Shield, and Copyright Laws often ignored or worked around. These are largely derivatives of a paper based world and a pre-computing world are now largely unfit for purpose.
Small Arms Lethality variables 1.6e DRAFTJA Larson
small arms lethality is a complex equation.
military operations are generally a team event.....more like football or soccer than tennis......
therefore teamwork and safety adds complexity
Donate to charity during this holiday seasonSERUDS INDIA
For people who have money and are philanthropic, there are infinite opportunities to gift a needy person or child a Merry Christmas. Even if you are living on a shoestring budget, you will be surprised at how much you can do.
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-to-donate-to-charity-during-this-holiday-season/
#charityforchildren, #donateforchildren, #donateclothesforchildren, #donatebooksforchildren, #donatetoysforchildren, #sponsorforchildren, #sponsorclothesforchildren, #sponsorbooksforchildren, #sponsortoysforchildren, #seruds, #kurnool
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
2. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to
implement an alternative physical
conditioning POI for soldiers who failed
the initial physical fitness assessment.
The three major objectives were:
– Decrease risk of injury.
– Decrease all cause attrition.
– Increase performance on Week 7 APFT.
3. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
IET Research Team
• DR Matt Beekley, PhD (Exercise Physiology)
• DR Todd Crowder, PhD (Exercise Physiology)
• DR Whitfield East, EdD (Measurement and Evaluation)
• DR Sue Tendy (Movement Specialist)
• DR Tom Horne, PhD (Movement Specialist)
• COL Maureen LeBoeuf, PhD (Physical Education)
• CPT Jon Alt, MS (Strength Training)
• MR Craig Yunker, MS, ATC/L (Athletic Training)
• MR Tim Kelly, ATC/L (Athletic Training)
• MR Ken Cameron, ATC/L (Athletic Training)
• LTC Joe Moore (Physical Therapy)
• MAJ Danny McMillian (Physical Therapy)
• DR Ray Wood (Sport Psychology)
• MR Ray Barone (Strength Development/Conditioning)
4. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
IET Timeline
Identify PCU location, cadre
Finalize PCU POI
Finalize SITs Selection Criteria
Select Dependent Variables
Identify PCU location, cadre
Finalize PCU POI
Finalize SITs Selection Criteria
Select Dependent Variables
Analyze Data
Prepare Summary Report
Brief COL Fondacaro
Analyze Data
Prepare Summary Report
Brief COL Fondacaro
Conduct Initial Testing
Assign Soldiers to PCU
Initiate PCU POI
Conduct Initial Testing
Assign Soldiers to PCU
Initiate PCU POI
JUN JUL AUG DECSEPT OCT NOV
T3 PCU POI Supervisors
Assign to BCT
Execute PCU POI
T3 PCU POI Supervisors
Assign to BCT
Execute PCU POI
MAYAPR
5. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Weekly/Daily Training POI
• 2 Cardio sessions/day
– Impact
– Non-impact
• 1 MSE session/day alternating
extremities/core body
• Red Phase military skills
• Wellness and personal fitness lessons
6. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Experimental Protocol
• 250 subjects (125 male/125 female) who
failed the RBn physical fitness test.
• Subjects were housed at Alpha 1/61.
• Participated in 4 weeks of physical
training.
• Retested on week 5 and shipped to BCT –
1/34 and 2/39.
• Physical performance, injury, and attrition
were tracked for BCT.
7. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Cycle 1- 1 16-Jun 17-Jun 18-Jun 19-Jun 20-Jun
Value of
Week
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
0600-0800 Warm-up Warm-up Warm-up Warm-up Warm-up
Trail Walk Track Intervals Hill Intervals Trail Walk Track Intervals
1.5 miles W - R W - R 1.5 miles W - R
Alpha 1-61 PT 2-39 Track Alpha 1-61 PT Alpha 1-61 PT 2-39 Track
Stretch Stretch Stretch Stretch Stretch
DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton
0800-0900 Chow/PH Chow/PH Chow/PH Chow/PH Chow/PH
0900-1030 D&C PD 2
D&C PD 3
(Indivdual Drill)
Army Values
Equal
Opportunity
D&C
(Reinforce)
DS Baxter DS Aiken 1SG Yarborough 1SG Yarborough DS Norton
1030-1200 MSE 1 MSE 2 MSE 1 MSE 2 MSE 1
DS Cruz DS Cruz DS Cruz DS Cruz DS Cruz
1200-1300 Chow Chow Chow Chow Chow
1300-1345
Introduction to
Wellness
Exercise
Adherence
How to Run -
Running Shoes
Principles of CRE
Exercice
Nutrition I
Dr. East Dr. Horne Dr. Horne Dr. Horne Dr. Horne
1400-1500 Pool Pool Pool Pool Pool
DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton
1530-1700 DS Time DS Time DS Time DS Time DS Time
1700-1800 Chow Chow Chow Chow Chow
1800-2100 DS Time DS Time DS Time DS Time DS Time
21-Jun 22-Jun
Saturday Sunday
Warm-up
Hill Intervals Recovery
W - R
Alpha 1-61 PT
Stretch
DS Norton
Chow/PH Chow/PH
AL-DG/FA/
Rape
1SG Yarborough
MSE 2
DS Cruz
Chow Chow
Nutrition II
Dr. Horne
Pool
DS Norton
DS Time
Chow Chow
Values Wrap Up
8. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Cycle 1 - 4 7-Jul 8-Jul 9-Jul 10-Jul 11-Jul
Value of
Week
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
0600-0800 Warm-up Warm-up Warm-up Warm-up Warm-up
Trail Walk Hill Intervals Track Intervals Trail Walk Hill Intervals
4 miles W-R-R-R W-R-R-R 4 miles W-R-R-R
Darby Field Alpha 1-61 PT Pecan Orchard Darby Field Alpha 1-61 PT
Stretch Stretch Stretch Stretch Stretch
DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton
0800-0900 Chow/PH Chow/PH Chow/PH Chow/PH Chow/PH
0900-1030
Guard Duty
PD-2
D&C PD-5
(Sqd.)
Inspection
PD-1
D&C PD-6
(Platoon)
Inspection
PD-2
DS Lyde DS Norton 1SG Yarborough DS Norton CPT Davis
1030-1200 MSE 1 MSE 2 MSE 1 MSE 2 MSE 1
DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton DS Norton
1200-1300 Chow Chow Chow Chow Chow
1300-1345 D & C (Reinforce)
Report Info
Potential Intel.
( SALUTE )
Perform Voice
Commo
FA
(Reinforce)
Map
(Reinforce)
DS Harps DS Norton DS Norton DS Grubbs DS Sharp
1400-1500 Bike Pool Bike Pool Pool
DS Lyde DS Horval DS Lyde DS Horval DS Lyde
1530-1700 DS Time DS Time DS Time DS Time DS Time
1700-1800 Chow Chow Chow Chow Chow
1800-2100 DS Time DS Time DS Time DS Time DS Time
12-Jul 13-Jul
Saturday Sunday
Warm-up Recovery
Track Intervals
W-R-R-R
Pecan Orchard
Stretch
DS Norton
Chow/PH Chow/PH
BRM
(Enhancement)
DS Norton
MSE 2
DS Norton
Chow Chow
Cmdrs Time
Pool
DS Horval
DS Time
Chow Chow
Values Wrap Up
9. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
10. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
11. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
12. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
13. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
14. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
15. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
16. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
17. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
6/16 6/23 6/30 7/7 7/14
Miles per Day
18. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
00:00
02:24
04:48
07:12
09:36
12:00
PCU-X 1MR
Females 11:09 09:16 01:53
Males 09:19 07:55 01:23
Pre Post Delta
19. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Reception Bn 1MR
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
MALES FEMALES
PCU-X
PCU-T*
PCU-C*
NO PCU
*Knapik, et. al.
20. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Percentage PCU ATTRITION
0
5
10
15
20
PCU - X 10 2 12
FY 02 19 1 20
DISCHARGE PTRP TOTAL
21. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
PUSH-UPS (MALES)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
WEEK 1 WEEK 7
PCU-X
PCU-T
PCU-C
NO PCU
22. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
PUSH-UPS (FEMALES)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
WEEK 1 WEEK 7
PCU-X
PCU-T
PCU-C
NO PCU
23. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
SIT-UPS (MALES)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
WEEK 1 WEEK 7
PCU-X
PCU-T
PCU-C
NO PCU
24. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
SIT-UPS (FEMALES)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
WEEK 1 WEEK 7
PCU-X
PCU-T
PCU-C
NO PCU
25. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
2MR (MALES)
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
WEEK 1 WEEK 7
PCU-X
PCU-T
PCU-C
NO PCU
26. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
2MR (FEMALES)
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
WEEK 1 WEEK 7
PCU-X
PCU-T
PCU-C
NO PCU
27. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
APFT TOTAL POINTS (MALES)
0
50
100
150
200
250
WEEK 1 WEEK 7
PCU-X
PCU-T
PCU-C
NO PCU
28. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
APFT TOTAL POINTS (FEMALES)
0
50
100
150
200
250
WEEK 1 WEEK 7
PCU-X
PCU-T
PCU-C
NO PCU
29. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
PERCENTAGE PASSING APFT
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MALES FEMALES
PCU-X
PCU-T
PCU-C
NO PCU
30. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Gender Pushups Situps 2 MR Total
Females 26 62 18:05 216
Males 44 63 15.47 210
Females 23 59 17:59 209
Males 42 61 15:27 203
TRN BN
APFT Averages
1-34
2-39
APFT Results by BN (pass)
FY02 BCT APFT: Males = 219; Females = 218.
31. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
PERCENTAGE FINAL APFT FAILURES*
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
MALES FEMALES
PCU-X
PCU-T
PCU-C
NO PCU
Pending
confirmation of
‘fresh starts’.
32. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
PERCENTAGE BCT INJURIES
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
MALES FEMALES
PCU-X
PCU-T
PCU-C
NO PCU
33. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
BCT ATTRITION: DISCHARGE
PERCENTAGES
0
5
10
15
20
25
MALES FEMALES
FAP-X
FAP-T
FAP-C
NO PCU
34. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Initial Conclusions
Base upon participation in PCU-X:
• All cause attrition was lower than traditional PCU
attrition (11% v. 19%).
• BCT Week 1 APFT scores were higher (M=130/103,
F=134/82).
• BCT Week 7 APFT scores were higher (M=193/177;
F=203/186).
• Female injuries were lower (2.7% v. 8.2%-T 9.6%-C
4.7%-N).
• APFT failure rate was higher for males and females
(15% v. 10%).
35. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS
1. Determine appropriate pre-accession
physical fitness screening tool and
standards.
2. Conduct a PCU Risk Factor Assessment.
3. Study of the proper ‘length’ of PCU/BCT.
4. Properly resource PCU; facilities and
trained staff.
5. Conduct a PCU study that is “real world,”
taking into account logistics, equipment,
and other constraints.
36. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
6. Place Certified Athletic Trainers in the
PCU, IET environment.
7. Work with civilian contractors to provide
healthier meal choices in mess halls
8. Focus on development of life skills in the
cognitive domain during PCU/BCT.
37. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
QUESTIONS?
38. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Backup Slides
39. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
INITIAL SURVEY RESPONSES:
SITs Who Pass/Fail the Initial
RBn Fitness Test
40. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Current Level of Fitness
Yes No Total
Less fit to far
less fit than
average
377
43.6%
488
56.4%
865
100.0%
Average to far
greater
248
15.5%
1348
84.5%
1596
100.0%
Total
522
22.2%
1829
77.8%
2361
100.0%
p = .000
41. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Participated in Running Exercises
3x/week or more
Yes No Total
No
217
24.8%
675
75.2%
874
100.0%
Last Month
204
24.6%
626
75.4%
830
100.0%
> 6 months
103
13.6%
655
86.4%
758
100.0%
Total
524
22.2%
1835
77.8%
2349
100.0%
p = .000
42. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Participated in MSE Exercises
3x/week or more
Yes No Total
No
325
23.6%
105
76.4%
1378
100.0%
Last Month
87
25.8%
250
74.2%
337
100.0%
> 6 months
110
17.3%
526
82.7%
636
100.0%
Total
522
22.2%
1829
77.8%
2351
100.0%
p = .000
43. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Participated in Organized H.S. or
College Sports
Yes No Total
Yes
178
19.4%
739
80.6%
917
100.0%
No
345
24.1%
1087
75.9%
1432
100.0%
Total
523
22.3%
1826
77.7%
2349
100.0%
p = .008
44. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Taken Shots for Birth Control
such as Depo-Provera
Yes No Total
Yes
70
35.2%
129
64.8%
199
100.0%
No
186
24.0%
588
76.0%
774
100.0%
Total
256
26.3%
717
73.7%
973
100.0%
p = .001
45. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
PCU-X Attrition v. APFT Failures
SITS per week 1500
PCU SITs 150 x 48 = 7200
PCU Attrition (19%) 1568 (attrit) / 5832 (ship)
PCU-X (11%) 792 (attrit) / 6408 (ship)
PCU APFT Failure (10%) 583
PCU APFT Pass 5249
PCU-X Failures (17%) 1089
PCU_X Pass 5319
Pass Delta 70
46. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
FAP-X Completion Stats
Initial Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Total
Females 68 59 127
Males 57 66 123
Total 125 125 250
Shipped Cycle 1 Cycle 2
Females 56 50 106
Males 48 65 113
Total 104 115 219
Participation Numbers
47. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
FAP-X Completion Statistics
Ship ELS/EPTS Failures Profile No Record
Cycle 1 125 104 5 11 5 0
Cycle 2 125 109 5 4 6 1
250 213 10 15 11 1
Cycle 1
Holdovers
16 6 9 1 0 0
Final # 250 219 19 5 6 1
Final Ship % 87.60% 7.60% 2.00% 2.40% 0.40%
Cycle Numbers and Percentages
48. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
87.60%
7.60%
2.00% 2.40% 0.40%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Ship
ELS/EPTS
Failures
Profile
No
R
ecord
PCU-X COMPLETION STATS
49. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
FAP-X BCT Results
63.01%
11.87%
3.20% 3.20%
16.89%
1.83%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Passed
ELS/EPTS
PTRP
No
Record
APFT
Failed
R
ecord
APFT
No
Record
50. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
APFT Enhancement Results
Active 4 8.33%
Passed APFT 10 20.83%
ELS/EPTS 8 16.67%
No Info 7 14.58%
Failed No Info 19 39.58%
Total 48 100.00%
51. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Final Injury Results
Ship IET PTRP BCT PTRP
Cycle 1 104 4 6
Cycle 2 110 6 1
Cycle 1 Hold 6 1
Final Ship 220 6
2.40% 3.18%
52. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
INITIAL SUMMARY OF FINDINGS PCU-X
• Sig. BCT ship rates.
• Sig. BCT injuries.
• Week 7 APFT scores.
• overall BCT attritions.
• BCT Week 7 APFT failures (pending
confirmation of ‘fresh starts’.
53. D e p a r t m e n t o f P h y s i c a l E d u c a t i o n
S e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a I n t a I n t h e s t a n d a r dS e t t h e s t a n d a r d . . .m a i n t a i n t h e s t a n d a r d
Take Aways
• Better assess incoming physical
performance.
• 4-weeks appears to be about right.
• PCU SITs need the cognitive/life
skills piece to be successful for the
long term.
• Motivation (caring) is crucial to PCU
SIT’s success and hardiness.