GT01003
Macroeconomics
Learning Objectives
1. Identify the key assumptions of the basic Keynesian
model
2. Explain how to develop a model of Planned Aggregate
Expenditure (PAE)
3. Analyze how an economy reaches short-run
equilibrium in the basic Keynesian model
 Do the analysis with both numbers and graphs
Learning Objectives
4. Show how a change in planned aggregate expenditure
can cause a change in the short-run equilibrium
output
 Explain how this is related to the income-expenditure
model
5. Explain why the basic Keynesian model suggests that
fiscal policy is useful
John Maynard Keynes (1883 –
1946)
 The idea that a decline in aggregate
spending may cause output to fall
below potential output was one of the
key insights of John Maynard Keynes.
 The goal of this lecture is to present a
theory/model of how recession and
expansion may arise from
fluctuations in planned aggregate
expenditure or total planned
spending.
Keynesian Model
 Building block for current theories of short-run economic
fluctuations and stabilization policies
 In the short run, firms meet demand at preset prices
 Firms typically set a price and meet the demand at that price
in the short run
 Menu price is the cost of changing prices
 Determining the new price
 Incorporating prices into the business
 Informing consumers of new prices
 Firms change prices when the marginal benefits exceed the
marginal costs
Key
Assumption
Keynesian Model
Will new technologies make the Keynesian theory less
relevant to the real world??
 Technology has reduced menu costs
 Bar codes and scanners reduce costs of changing prices in the store
 Online surveys
 Highly segmented airline pricing
 Internet mechanisms for setting price
 eBay ■ Priceline
 Other costs remain
 Competitive analysis ■ Deciding the new prices
 Informing consumers
New Technologies
New Technologies
New Technologies
Planned Aggregate Expenditure (PAE)
 Planned aggregate expenditure is planned spending on
final goods and services
 Four components of planned aggregate expenditure
 Consumption (C) by households
 Investment (I) is planned spending by domestic firms
on new capital goods
 Government purchases (G) are made by federal state
and local governments
 Net exports (NX) is exports minus imports
Planned Aggregate Expenditure (PAE)
 Actual spending equals planned spending for
 Consumption
 Government purchases of final goods and services
 Net exports
 Adjustments between actual and planned spending
are accomplished with changes in inventories
 The general equation for planned aggregate
expenditures is
PAE = C + IP + G + NX
Develop a Model of PAE:
Consumption Expenditures
 Consumption (C) accounts for two-thirds of total
spending
 Powerful determinant of planned aggregate spending
 Includes purchases of goods, services, and consumer
durables, but not houses
 Rent is considered a service
 C depends on disposable income, (Y – T)
Consumption, 1960 - 2007
Develop a Model of PAE:
Consumption Function
 The consumption function is an equation relating
planned consumption to its determinants, notably
disposable income (Y – T)
C = C + (mpc) (Y – T)
where C is autonomous consumption spending
mpc is the change in consumption for a given
change in (Y – T)
 Autonomous consumption is spending not related to the
level of disposable income
 A change in C shifts the consumption function
Develop a Model of PAE:
Consumption Function
C = C + (mpc) (Y – T)
 The wealth effect is the tendency of changes in asset
prices to affect household's wealth and this
consumption spending
 This effect is included in C
 C also captures the effects of interest rates on
consumption
 Higher rates increase the cost of using credit to purchase
consumer durables and other items
Develop a Model of PAE:
Consumption Function
C = C + (mpc) (Y – T)
 Marginal propensity to consume (mpc) is the
increase in consumption spending when disposable
income increases by $1
 mpc is between 0 and 1 for the economy
 If households receive an extra $1 in income, they spend
part (mpc) and save part
 (Y – T) is disposable income
 Output plus government transfers minus taxes
 Main determinant of consumption spending
Develop a Model of PAE:
Consumption Function
Disposable income (Y – T)
Consumptionspending(C)
C
C = C + (mpc) (Y – T)
Δ (Y – T)
Δ C
C
Intercept
Slope = Δ C / Δ (Y – T)
slope
Planned Aggregate Expenditure
(PAE)
 Two dynamic patterns in the economy
1. Declines in production lead to reduced spending
2. Reductions in spending lead to declines in production
and income
 Consumption is the largest component of PAE
 Consumption depends on output, Y
 PAE depends on Y
Planned Spending Example
PAE = C + IP + G + NX
C = C + mpc (Y – T)
PAE = C + mpc (Y – T) + IP + G + NX
 Suppose that planned spending components have the
following values
PAE = 620 + 0.8 (Y – 250) + 220 + 330 + 20
PAE = 960 + 0.8 Y
C = 620 mpc = 0.8 T = 250
IP = 220 G = 330 NX = 20
Planned Spending Example
C = 620 + 0.8 (Y – 250)
PAE = 960 + 0.8 Y
 If Y increases by $1, C will increase by $0.80
 PAE increases by 80 cents
 Planned aggregate expenditure has two parts
 Autonomous expenditure, the part of spending that
is independent of output
 $960 in our example
 Induced expenditure, the part of spending that
depends on output (Y)
 0.8 Y in our example
Planned Expenditure Graph
Output (Y)
Plannedaggregateexpenditure(PAE)
960
PAE = 960 + 0.8Y
Slope = 0.8
4,800
Short-Run Equilibrium
 Short-run equilibrium is the level of output at which
planned spending is equal to output
 No change in output as long as prices are constant
 Our equilibrium condition can be written
Y = PAE
 Using our previous example, PAE = 960 + 0.8 Y
Y = 960 + 0.8 Y
0.2 Y = 960
Y = $4,800
Short-Run Equilibrium Search
Output (Y) PAE = 960 + 0.8 Y Y – PAE Y = PAE?
4,000 4,160 –160 No
4,200 4,320 –120 No
4,400 4,480 –80 No
4,600 4,640 –40 No
4,800 4,800 0 Yes
5,000 4,960 40 No
5,200 5,120 80 No
 Only when Y = 4,800 does planned spending equal
output
Short-Run Equilibrium Graph
Output (Y)
Plannedaggregateexpenditure(PAE)
960
PAE = 960 + 0.8Y
45o
Y = PAE
4,800
Slope = 0.8
Output Greater than Equilibrium
 Suppose output reaches
5,000
 Planned spending is
less than total output
 Unplanned inventory
increases
 Businesses slow down
production
 Output goes down
PAE
Output (Y)
96
0
PAE = 960 +
0.8Y
45o
Y = PAE
4,800 5,000
Output Less than Equilibrium
 Suppose output is only
4,500
 Planned spending is
more than total
output
 Unplanned inventory
decreases
 Businesses speed up
production
 Output goes up
PAE
Output (Y)
96
0
PAE = 960 +
0.8Y
Y = PAE
4,8004,700
Planned Spending and
the Output Gap
Output Y
Plannedaggregateexpenditure
(PAE)
960
E
PAE = 960 + 0.8Y
45o
Y = PAE
4,800
Y*
Recessionary gap
PAE = 950 + 0.8Y
950
F
4,750
Planned Spending and
the Output Gap
 Autonomous consumption, C, decreases by 10
 Causes a downward shift in the planned aggregate
expenditures curve
 The economy eventually adjusts to a new lower level of
equilibrium spending an output, $4,750
 Suppose that the original equilibrium
level, $4,800, represented potential output, Y*
 A recessionary gap develops
 Size of the recessionary gap is 4,800 – 4,750 = $50
 Entire decrease is in Consumption spending
 Same process applies to a decrease in IP, G, or NX
–
Planned Spending and
the Output Gap
 Japanese recession in 1990s reduced Japanese imports
 East Asian economies developed by promoting
exports
 The decrease in exports to Japan decreased planned
aggregate expenditures in these countries
 The decrease in planned spending caused the economies
to contract to a new, lower level of planned spending and
output
 Japan exported its recession to its neighbors
 US recessions have similar effects on its major trading
partners
Planned Spending and
the Output Gap: US Recession 2001
 Robust investment spending, 1995 – 2000
 High growth economy
 New technologies: internet, fiber optics, genetic
engineering
 Not as promising as anticipated
 Recession caused by a decline in autonomous
spending
 Less investment in 2001
 Terrorist attack 9/11
 Travel spending decreased
 Recovery began 2002
Income-Expenditure Multiplier
 The income – expenditure multiplier shows the effect
of a one-unit increase in autonomous expenditure on
short-run equilibrium output
 Previous example
 Initial planned expenditure = 960 + 0.8 Y
 New planned expenditure = 950 + 0.8 Y
 Equilibrium changed from $4,800 to $4,750
 A $10 change in autonomous expenditures caused a $50
change in output
 Multiplier = 5
 The larger mpc, the greater the multiplier
Stabilization Policy
 Stabilization policies are government actions to
affect planned spending with the intention of
eliminating output gaps
 Expansionary policies increase planned spending
 Contractionary policies decrease planned spending
 Two major stabilization tools are fiscal policy and
monetary policy
 Fiscal policy uses changes in government
spending, transfers, or taxes
 Monetary policy uses changes in the money supply
Fiscal Policy and Recessions
 Government spending is part of planned spending
 Changes in government spending will directly affect planned
aggregate expenditures
 Suppose planned spending decreases $ 10 from
Y = 960 + 0.8 Y to
Y = 950 + 0.8 Y
 Equilibrium Y decreases from $4,800 to $4,750
 Recessionary gap is $50
 Stabilization policy indicates a $10 increase in government
spending will restore the economy to Y* at $4,800
How can the Government eliminate
an Output Gap?
Output Y
Plannedaggregateexpenditure
(PAE)
960
PAE = 960 + 0.8Y
45o
Y = PAE
F
PAE = 950 + 0.8Y
95
0
4,750
E
4,800
Y*
Example: Japanese Spending
 In the 1990s Japan spent over $1 trillion on public
works
 Highways, subways, and transportation projects
 Concert halls
 Re-laying cobblestone sidewalks
Taxes and Transfers
 Planned aggregate expenditures are affected by taxes
and transfers
 The effect is indirect, channeled through the effects on
disposable income
 Lower taxes or higher transfers increase disposable
income
 Increases in disposable income lead to higher C
Fiscal Policy as a Stabilization Tool:
Three Qualifications
 The use of fiscal policy to stabilize the economy is
more complicated than suggested by the basic
Keynesian model.
 Three qualifications must be made to the use of fiscal
policy as a stabilization tool.
1. Fiscal policy may affect potential output as well as
potential spending
2. Large and persistent government budget deficits
reduce national saving and growth
3. The relative inflexibility of fiscal policy
Spending and Output in the Short
Run
Short-Run Spending and Output
Planned
Aggregate
Expenditures
(PAE)
Consumption
Function
Short-Run
Equilibrium
Changes in
Equilibrium
Output Gaps
Multiplier
Fiscal Policy
Limitations
Keynesian Model
Fiscal policy
Fiscal policy
Fiscal policy

Fiscal policy

  • 1.
  • 4.
    Learning Objectives 1. Identifythe key assumptions of the basic Keynesian model 2. Explain how to develop a model of Planned Aggregate Expenditure (PAE) 3. Analyze how an economy reaches short-run equilibrium in the basic Keynesian model  Do the analysis with both numbers and graphs
  • 5.
    Learning Objectives 4. Showhow a change in planned aggregate expenditure can cause a change in the short-run equilibrium output  Explain how this is related to the income-expenditure model 5. Explain why the basic Keynesian model suggests that fiscal policy is useful
  • 6.
    John Maynard Keynes(1883 – 1946)  The idea that a decline in aggregate spending may cause output to fall below potential output was one of the key insights of John Maynard Keynes.  The goal of this lecture is to present a theory/model of how recession and expansion may arise from fluctuations in planned aggregate expenditure or total planned spending.
  • 7.
    Keynesian Model  Buildingblock for current theories of short-run economic fluctuations and stabilization policies  In the short run, firms meet demand at preset prices  Firms typically set a price and meet the demand at that price in the short run  Menu price is the cost of changing prices  Determining the new price  Incorporating prices into the business  Informing consumers of new prices  Firms change prices when the marginal benefits exceed the marginal costs Key Assumption
  • 8.
    Keynesian Model Will newtechnologies make the Keynesian theory less relevant to the real world??  Technology has reduced menu costs  Bar codes and scanners reduce costs of changing prices in the store  Online surveys  Highly segmented airline pricing  Internet mechanisms for setting price  eBay ■ Priceline  Other costs remain  Competitive analysis ■ Deciding the new prices  Informing consumers
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Planned Aggregate Expenditure(PAE)  Planned aggregate expenditure is planned spending on final goods and services  Four components of planned aggregate expenditure  Consumption (C) by households  Investment (I) is planned spending by domestic firms on new capital goods  Government purchases (G) are made by federal state and local governments  Net exports (NX) is exports minus imports
  • 13.
    Planned Aggregate Expenditure(PAE)  Actual spending equals planned spending for  Consumption  Government purchases of final goods and services  Net exports  Adjustments between actual and planned spending are accomplished with changes in inventories  The general equation for planned aggregate expenditures is PAE = C + IP + G + NX
  • 14.
    Develop a Modelof PAE: Consumption Expenditures  Consumption (C) accounts for two-thirds of total spending  Powerful determinant of planned aggregate spending  Includes purchases of goods, services, and consumer durables, but not houses  Rent is considered a service  C depends on disposable income, (Y – T)
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Develop a Modelof PAE: Consumption Function  The consumption function is an equation relating planned consumption to its determinants, notably disposable income (Y – T) C = C + (mpc) (Y – T) where C is autonomous consumption spending mpc is the change in consumption for a given change in (Y – T)  Autonomous consumption is spending not related to the level of disposable income  A change in C shifts the consumption function
  • 17.
    Develop a Modelof PAE: Consumption Function C = C + (mpc) (Y – T)  The wealth effect is the tendency of changes in asset prices to affect household's wealth and this consumption spending  This effect is included in C  C also captures the effects of interest rates on consumption  Higher rates increase the cost of using credit to purchase consumer durables and other items
  • 18.
    Develop a Modelof PAE: Consumption Function C = C + (mpc) (Y – T)  Marginal propensity to consume (mpc) is the increase in consumption spending when disposable income increases by $1  mpc is between 0 and 1 for the economy  If households receive an extra $1 in income, they spend part (mpc) and save part  (Y – T) is disposable income  Output plus government transfers minus taxes  Main determinant of consumption spending
  • 19.
    Develop a Modelof PAE: Consumption Function Disposable income (Y – T) Consumptionspending(C) C C = C + (mpc) (Y – T) Δ (Y – T) Δ C C Intercept Slope = Δ C / Δ (Y – T) slope
  • 20.
    Planned Aggregate Expenditure (PAE) Two dynamic patterns in the economy 1. Declines in production lead to reduced spending 2. Reductions in spending lead to declines in production and income  Consumption is the largest component of PAE  Consumption depends on output, Y  PAE depends on Y
  • 21.
    Planned Spending Example PAE= C + IP + G + NX C = C + mpc (Y – T) PAE = C + mpc (Y – T) + IP + G + NX  Suppose that planned spending components have the following values PAE = 620 + 0.8 (Y – 250) + 220 + 330 + 20 PAE = 960 + 0.8 Y C = 620 mpc = 0.8 T = 250 IP = 220 G = 330 NX = 20
  • 22.
    Planned Spending Example C= 620 + 0.8 (Y – 250) PAE = 960 + 0.8 Y  If Y increases by $1, C will increase by $0.80  PAE increases by 80 cents  Planned aggregate expenditure has two parts  Autonomous expenditure, the part of spending that is independent of output  $960 in our example  Induced expenditure, the part of spending that depends on output (Y)  0.8 Y in our example
  • 23.
    Planned Expenditure Graph Output(Y) Plannedaggregateexpenditure(PAE) 960 PAE = 960 + 0.8Y Slope = 0.8 4,800
  • 25.
    Short-Run Equilibrium  Short-runequilibrium is the level of output at which planned spending is equal to output  No change in output as long as prices are constant  Our equilibrium condition can be written Y = PAE  Using our previous example, PAE = 960 + 0.8 Y Y = 960 + 0.8 Y 0.2 Y = 960 Y = $4,800
  • 26.
    Short-Run Equilibrium Search Output(Y) PAE = 960 + 0.8 Y Y – PAE Y = PAE? 4,000 4,160 –160 No 4,200 4,320 –120 No 4,400 4,480 –80 No 4,600 4,640 –40 No 4,800 4,800 0 Yes 5,000 4,960 40 No 5,200 5,120 80 No  Only when Y = 4,800 does planned spending equal output
  • 27.
    Short-Run Equilibrium Graph Output(Y) Plannedaggregateexpenditure(PAE) 960 PAE = 960 + 0.8Y 45o Y = PAE 4,800 Slope = 0.8
  • 28.
    Output Greater thanEquilibrium  Suppose output reaches 5,000  Planned spending is less than total output  Unplanned inventory increases  Businesses slow down production  Output goes down PAE Output (Y) 96 0 PAE = 960 + 0.8Y 45o Y = PAE 4,800 5,000
  • 29.
    Output Less thanEquilibrium  Suppose output is only 4,500  Planned spending is more than total output  Unplanned inventory decreases  Businesses speed up production  Output goes up PAE Output (Y) 96 0 PAE = 960 + 0.8Y Y = PAE 4,8004,700
  • 31.
    Planned Spending and theOutput Gap Output Y Plannedaggregateexpenditure (PAE) 960 E PAE = 960 + 0.8Y 45o Y = PAE 4,800 Y* Recessionary gap PAE = 950 + 0.8Y 950 F 4,750
  • 32.
    Planned Spending and theOutput Gap  Autonomous consumption, C, decreases by 10  Causes a downward shift in the planned aggregate expenditures curve  The economy eventually adjusts to a new lower level of equilibrium spending an output, $4,750  Suppose that the original equilibrium level, $4,800, represented potential output, Y*  A recessionary gap develops  Size of the recessionary gap is 4,800 – 4,750 = $50  Entire decrease is in Consumption spending  Same process applies to a decrease in IP, G, or NX –
  • 33.
    Planned Spending and theOutput Gap  Japanese recession in 1990s reduced Japanese imports  East Asian economies developed by promoting exports  The decrease in exports to Japan decreased planned aggregate expenditures in these countries  The decrease in planned spending caused the economies to contract to a new, lower level of planned spending and output  Japan exported its recession to its neighbors  US recessions have similar effects on its major trading partners
  • 34.
    Planned Spending and theOutput Gap: US Recession 2001  Robust investment spending, 1995 – 2000  High growth economy  New technologies: internet, fiber optics, genetic engineering  Not as promising as anticipated  Recession caused by a decline in autonomous spending  Less investment in 2001  Terrorist attack 9/11  Travel spending decreased  Recovery began 2002
  • 35.
    Income-Expenditure Multiplier  Theincome – expenditure multiplier shows the effect of a one-unit increase in autonomous expenditure on short-run equilibrium output  Previous example  Initial planned expenditure = 960 + 0.8 Y  New planned expenditure = 950 + 0.8 Y  Equilibrium changed from $4,800 to $4,750  A $10 change in autonomous expenditures caused a $50 change in output  Multiplier = 5  The larger mpc, the greater the multiplier
  • 37.
    Stabilization Policy  Stabilizationpolicies are government actions to affect planned spending with the intention of eliminating output gaps  Expansionary policies increase planned spending  Contractionary policies decrease planned spending  Two major stabilization tools are fiscal policy and monetary policy  Fiscal policy uses changes in government spending, transfers, or taxes  Monetary policy uses changes in the money supply
  • 38.
    Fiscal Policy andRecessions  Government spending is part of planned spending  Changes in government spending will directly affect planned aggregate expenditures  Suppose planned spending decreases $ 10 from Y = 960 + 0.8 Y to Y = 950 + 0.8 Y  Equilibrium Y decreases from $4,800 to $4,750  Recessionary gap is $50  Stabilization policy indicates a $10 increase in government spending will restore the economy to Y* at $4,800
  • 39.
    How can theGovernment eliminate an Output Gap? Output Y Plannedaggregateexpenditure (PAE) 960 PAE = 960 + 0.8Y 45o Y = PAE F PAE = 950 + 0.8Y 95 0 4,750 E 4,800 Y*
  • 40.
    Example: Japanese Spending In the 1990s Japan spent over $1 trillion on public works  Highways, subways, and transportation projects  Concert halls  Re-laying cobblestone sidewalks
  • 41.
    Taxes and Transfers Planned aggregate expenditures are affected by taxes and transfers  The effect is indirect, channeled through the effects on disposable income  Lower taxes or higher transfers increase disposable income  Increases in disposable income lead to higher C
  • 42.
    Fiscal Policy asa Stabilization Tool: Three Qualifications  The use of fiscal policy to stabilize the economy is more complicated than suggested by the basic Keynesian model.  Three qualifications must be made to the use of fiscal policy as a stabilization tool. 1. Fiscal policy may affect potential output as well as potential spending 2. Large and persistent government budget deficits reduce national saving and growth 3. The relative inflexibility of fiscal policy
  • 43.
    Spending and Outputin the Short Run Short-Run Spending and Output Planned Aggregate Expenditures (PAE) Consumption Function Short-Run Equilibrium Changes in Equilibrium Output Gaps Multiplier Fiscal Policy Limitations Keynesian Model