Milgram's experiment and subsequent research identified four key reasons for obedience: gradual commitment makes it difficult to disobey small requests; people obey legitimate authorities due to societal hierarchies; individuals can deny responsibility by becoming agents of an external authority through an agentic shift; and dehumanizing victims makes inflicting harm easier by distancing oneself from the individual.
conformity is a type of social influence that is very common in the society and it has the definitions and some experiments during the years done to prove this concept.
Zimbardo's Experiment : The Stanford Prison ExperimentVedang Vatsa
The Stanford prison experiment (SPE) was an attempt to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power, focusing on the struggle between prisoners and prison officers. It was conducted at Stanford University between August 14–20, 1971, by a research group led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo.
Conformity involves changing your behaviors in order to "fit in" or "go along" with the people around you. In some cases, this social influence might involve agreeing with or acting like the majority of people in a specific group, or it might involve behaving in a particular way in order to be perceived as "normal" by the group.
conformity is a type of social influence that is very common in the society and it has the definitions and some experiments during the years done to prove this concept.
Zimbardo's Experiment : The Stanford Prison ExperimentVedang Vatsa
The Stanford prison experiment (SPE) was an attempt to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power, focusing on the struggle between prisoners and prison officers. It was conducted at Stanford University between August 14–20, 1971, by a research group led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo.
Conformity involves changing your behaviors in order to "fit in" or "go along" with the people around you. In some cases, this social influence might involve agreeing with or acting like the majority of people in a specific group, or it might involve behaving in a particular way in order to be perceived as "normal" by the group.
Obedience is a form of social influence that involves performing an action under the orders of an authority figure. It differs from
compliance (which involves changing your behavior at the request of another person) and
conformity (which involves altering your behavior in order to go along with the rest of the group). Instead, obedience involves altering your behavior because a figure of authority has told you to.
The Bobo doll experiment was an experiment conducted by Albert Bandura which put two groups of adults into rooms full of toys which were observed by two groups of children and they both.....
Obedience is compliance with commands given by an authority figure. In the 1960s, the social psychologist Stanley Milgram did a famous research study called the obedience study.
It showed that people have a strong tendency to comply with authority figures.
In psychology, compliance refers to changing one's behavior due to the request or direction of another person.
It is going along with the group or changing a behavior to fit in with the group, while still disagreeing with the group.
Unlike obedience, in which the other individual is in a position of authority, compliance does not rely upon being in a position of power or authority over others.
Psychology 1Compare and contrast the tra.docxpotmanandrea
Psychology
1
Compare and contrast the trait, humanism, psychodynamic, and behavioral personality theories. Minimum 200 words.
You can find some information about Psychology of Personality in the next 3 slides.
#1 Essay
Personality- a person’s unique and relatively stable patterns of thinking emotions and behavior
Personality Traits- A stable, enduring quality that a person shows in most situations
Personality Type- A style of personality defined by a group of related traits
Psychology of Personality
Personality theories- A system of concepts, assumptions, ideas and principles used to understand and explain personality
Categorized in 4 major perspectives
Trait theories
What traits make up personality and how they relate to actual behavior
Psychodynamic Theories
Focus on the inner workings of personality, especially internal conflicts and struggles
Humanistic Theories
Stress private, subjective experience, and personal growth
Behaviorist/ social learning Theories
Place importance on environment and the effects of conditioning and learning
Personality Theories
Interviews- face-to-face meeting held for the purpose of gaining information about an individual’s personal history, personality traits, psychological state, etc.
Some times Direct Observation is used-assessing behavior through surveillance
Limitations- interviewer preconceptions; interviewer’s traits may skew client behavior; people try to deceive interviewer; Halo Effect- generalizing (positive or negative)
Situational testing- simulating real-life conditions so that a person’s reactions may be directly observed
Army, Police department, fire department
Personality Assessments
Describe the Milgram study. Include the design of the study, the purpose of the study, and the results. What do the results represent/mean? Minimum 200 words.
You can find some information about Milgram Study in the next 3 slides.
#2 Essay
Changing our behavior because of the presence of others.
Three levels: conformity, compliance, obedience
The more important the group, the stronger the influence
Social Influence
Milgram
7
Changing our behavior in direct response to the demands of an authority figure
Milgram’s study prompted by Nazi regime
Obedience
Milgram
8
The results
65% obeyed by going all the way to 450 volts on the “shock machine,” even though the learner eventually could not answer any more questions
The learner screamed and provided no further answers once 300 volts (“severe shock”) was reached
Milgram
Milgram
9
...
3. Gradual commitment
Participants become locked
into obedience in small steps ‘Foot in the door’
technique
Once you have made some sort
of commitment it’s hard to go
back on it.
Real life
example?
4. What techniques did you use?
‘Take it for a test ‘Why don’t you sit
drive, see how it in the car and see
feels’ if you like it?’
‘Can I just take
some details so that
‘Imagine driving
we can enter you
home in your new into the system?’
car today’
5. Gradual Commitment A02
P – Evidence to support the gradual commitment
explanation of obedience comes from Milgram’s
experiment
E – For example, the participant was required to
administer shocks starting from 15v and increasing in
15v increments (each action was small making it
harder to back out)
E – This is a strength because Milgram’s research
demonstrates that small level obedience and
increasing in small stages make it very difficult for the
participant to disobey
6. Legitimate Authority
The amount of social power
held by the person who gives Society is ordered
the instruction in a hierarchical
way
From early childhood we are
taught that we should obey those
who have authority over us
Trust
We obey legitimate
authority because:
Punishment
7. Legitimate Authority A02
P – Evidence to support the legitimate authority
explanation of obedience comes from Milgram’s
experiment
E – For example, obedience rates were much higher
when the research took place at Yale with the
experimenter wearing a lab coat compared to the
variation in a run-down office block with the
experimenter in ‘normal’ clothes
E – This is a strength because it shows that the perceived
amount of authority a person holds will directly impact
the extent to which others will obey them.
8. Form your own hierarchy
• Think of who you obey in your life
• Place them in the hierarchy template
• Now try to decide if you obey because you
trust them or fear punishment
9. Agentic Shift
It’s easy to deny personal
responsibility when an order has Individuals
become ‘agents’
come from an authority figure for an external
authority
Obedience occurs because of a
conflict between internal and
external authority:
Internal Authority Own conscience
External Authority Authority Figure
10. Agentic Shift A02
P – Evidence to support the agentic shift explanation of
obedience comes from Milgram’s experiment
E – For example, many participants throughout the
research expressed concern as to the fact they
believed they’d be held responsible for any harm done
to the ‘learner’, to which the experimenter replied that
they’d take full responsibility
E – This supports the idea of the agentic shift as the
participants demonstrated that they would obey the
authority figure when they considered themselves to
be an agent/worker for an external authority
11. Dehumanisation
We are more likely to inflict
harm on someone if we can
Role of ‘buffers’
distance ourselves from the
- often seen in
victim war
Remove the persons
individuality (e.g. removing
face, name)
Dehumanisation makes it
easier to remove/avoid
moral responsibility
12. Dehumanisation A02
P – Evidence to support the dehumanisation explanation of
obedience comes from Milgram’s experiment
E – For example, in the original experiment Mr Wallace (the
‘learner’) was placed in a separate room to the participant,
allowing them to distance themselves from the ‘learner’ and
their pain, however, in the variations where the ‘learner’ was
brought to the same room as the participant obedience rates
dropped
E – This supports the idea of dehumanisation, whereby people are
more willing to inflict harm on others if they can remove
themselves from the individual as a ‘real person’ and rather
view them as a number
13. We know why people conform and
obey
- Now we need to work out...
Why do some people remain independent
and resist conformity and obedience?
In pairs/threes discuss this and write some
answers down on the post-it provided