Conformity
Why we follow others.
Elmakrufi.Blogspot.com
What is conformity?
• Conformity--a change in behavior or belief as a
result of real or “imagined” group pressure.
• It is not simply acting like others, but also being
effected by how they act.
• You “consciously” act differently from the way
you would act alone.
Two Types of Conformity:
• 1. Compliance - involves publicly acting
in accord with social pressure while
privately disagreeing.
• Why do we do this?
• We comply to receive a reward or to avoid
a punishment.
Types of Conformity contd.
• 2. Acceptance - involves both acting and
believing in accord with social pressure.
• E.g., We may decide not to drink alcohol
because our society adopts a strong moral
view against drinking.
A. Classic Studies in Conformity:
• 1. Sherif’s studies of Norm Formation
• 2. Asch’s Studies of Group Pressure
1. Sherif’s Study: Part I
• Sherif (1935, 1937) wanted to examine the
formation of social norms.
• Ss were seated in a dark room. Fifteen ft. in
front of the S, a pinpoint of light appears.
• At first, nothing happens, then it appears to
move erratically & disappears.
• The S has to guess how far it moved.
The darkness of the room adds to
the Ss uncertainty.
• The S makes a “guess.” (6 inches). The
experimenter repeats the procedure & the S
guesses again.
• With repetitions, the S reports estimates that
tend to fall around an average (around 6-8
inches).
Sherif’s Study: Part II
• The next day, the S returns & is joined by two
others (also previous Ss).
• When light is presented, the other Ss give their
best guesses from the day before. One says “1
inch,” the other S says, “2 inches.”
• Surprised the S, says, “6 inches.” What he said
before.
• Does our subject’s original responses change
when in the company of the other two people?
Sherif’s findings:
• Sherif found that Columbia University
students, did change their responses when
in the presence of others.
• A group norm emerged!!!
The Norm was false!!!!
• Why????
• The light never moved!!! It a perceptual illusion
called the: autokinetic phenomenon.
• A solitary light that is stationary, will appear to
move, unless in the presence of another blinking
light (reference).
Sherif’s followup:
When tested a year later would their
answers change?
• No, they continued to report the group
consensus!!!!
2. Asch’s group pressure study:
• A true S was seated in a row among confederates.
• The S was seated 6th
in a row of 7 people.
• The goal of the study was to examine perceptual
judgments & the participants were instructed to
pick which of 3 lines “matched” a standard line.
The true S could see that one of the lines was
obviously a match, the others obviously wrong.
2. Stimuli for study:
• X- standard line
Asch study
On first 2 trials, all people agree which line is right
size.
On 3rd
trial, all 5 people seated before the S, give
an incorrect answer.
What does our S (6th
seat) say?
75% of Ss in this experiment, conformed at least
once with the group and picked the wrong size
line.
Asch’s results:
• On average across trials, 37% of time Ss
conformed.
Do recent replications of Asch
study hold up?
• Mixed results, but many studies do not find
this conformity result.
B. Milgram Shock Experiment
Milgram advertised for participants to get
paid for completing Yale study on memory.
• 2 people showed up to psychology lab.
One was true S & the other a confederate.
• A stern experimenter in a lab coat,
explained that study was interested in the
effect of punishment on learning.
Milgram Study
• The S was to play the role of “teacher,” the
confederate, the role of “learner.”
• “Teacher” was to read word pairs to the
“learner” who was in another room hooked
up to shock leads.
• With each missed word, the S was to shock
the “learner.”
Milgram study
• The shock panel had switches ranging from
15 to 450 volts in 15-volt increments.
• Switches were labeled: “slight shock,”
“very strong shock,” “danger: severe
shock,” etc.
How many Ss went on shocking the
“learner” all the way?
Milgram’s Results:
• 65-66% of Ss continued shocking “learner”
to full capacity.
What factors influence obedience?
• 1. Emotional distance of victim
• 2. Closeness & legitimacy of the authority
• 3. Institutional authority
• 4. Liberating effects of group influence
When do people conform?
• 1. Group size- 3-5 people will elicit more
conformity than 1 or 2 people.
• Beyond 5 people- conformity drops off.
Milgram’s field study (1969):
• Required 1,2,3,5,10, or 15 people to
“pause” on a busy New York City sidewalk
& look up.
• % of people passing by who also looked up
increased as the number of people looking
up increased (from 1 to 5).
2. Unanimity
• An individual who disagrees with a group,
& punctures the group’s unanimity deflates
its social power.
• Ss will voice their own views if just 1
person has done so.
3. Cohesion
• The greater the cohesiveness of the group, the
more power it has over its members.
• We are more easily swayed by a minority opinion
from inside our group than from another group.
• E.g., we often feel compelled to “act-like” those
within our ethnic group to avoid being mocked by
members of our group (Contrada & others, 2000).
4. Status
• Higher-status people tend to have more
influence over others.
5. Public response:
• People conform more when they must
respond publicly in front of others.
Why do we conform?
• We conform to avoid rejection & to stay in
others’ good graces.
• Normative influence- “When in Rome, do
as the Romans would do.”
Who conforms?
• Are some people more likely to conform
than others?
• Who is more susceptible to conformity?
1. Personality-predisposes us to either
be conforming or non-conforming.
2. Culture- Conformity is higher in
countries high in collectivism & lower in
countries high in individualism.
Resisting Social Pressure
• 1. Reactance- people rebel when their
sense of freedom is threatened.
• 2. Asserting Uniqueness- being different
to make a statement about oneself.

Conformity

  • 1.
    Conformity Why we followothers. Elmakrufi.Blogspot.com
  • 2.
    What is conformity? •Conformity--a change in behavior or belief as a result of real or “imagined” group pressure. • It is not simply acting like others, but also being effected by how they act. • You “consciously” act differently from the way you would act alone.
  • 3.
    Two Types ofConformity: • 1. Compliance - involves publicly acting in accord with social pressure while privately disagreeing. • Why do we do this? • We comply to receive a reward or to avoid a punishment.
  • 4.
    Types of Conformitycontd. • 2. Acceptance - involves both acting and believing in accord with social pressure. • E.g., We may decide not to drink alcohol because our society adopts a strong moral view against drinking.
  • 5.
    A. Classic Studiesin Conformity: • 1. Sherif’s studies of Norm Formation • 2. Asch’s Studies of Group Pressure
  • 6.
    1. Sherif’s Study:Part I • Sherif (1935, 1937) wanted to examine the formation of social norms. • Ss were seated in a dark room. Fifteen ft. in front of the S, a pinpoint of light appears. • At first, nothing happens, then it appears to move erratically & disappears. • The S has to guess how far it moved.
  • 7.
    The darkness ofthe room adds to the Ss uncertainty. • The S makes a “guess.” (6 inches). The experimenter repeats the procedure & the S guesses again. • With repetitions, the S reports estimates that tend to fall around an average (around 6-8 inches).
  • 8.
    Sherif’s Study: PartII • The next day, the S returns & is joined by two others (also previous Ss). • When light is presented, the other Ss give their best guesses from the day before. One says “1 inch,” the other S says, “2 inches.” • Surprised the S, says, “6 inches.” What he said before. • Does our subject’s original responses change when in the company of the other two people?
  • 9.
    Sherif’s findings: • Sheriffound that Columbia University students, did change their responses when in the presence of others. • A group norm emerged!!!
  • 10.
    The Norm wasfalse!!!! • Why???? • The light never moved!!! It a perceptual illusion called the: autokinetic phenomenon. • A solitary light that is stationary, will appear to move, unless in the presence of another blinking light (reference).
  • 11.
    Sherif’s followup: When testeda year later would their answers change? • No, they continued to report the group consensus!!!!
  • 12.
    2. Asch’s grouppressure study: • A true S was seated in a row among confederates. • The S was seated 6th in a row of 7 people. • The goal of the study was to examine perceptual judgments & the participants were instructed to pick which of 3 lines “matched” a standard line. The true S could see that one of the lines was obviously a match, the others obviously wrong.
  • 13.
    2. Stimuli forstudy: • X- standard line
  • 14.
    Asch study On first2 trials, all people agree which line is right size. On 3rd trial, all 5 people seated before the S, give an incorrect answer. What does our S (6th seat) say? 75% of Ss in this experiment, conformed at least once with the group and picked the wrong size line.
  • 15.
    Asch’s results: • Onaverage across trials, 37% of time Ss conformed.
  • 16.
    Do recent replicationsof Asch study hold up? • Mixed results, but many studies do not find this conformity result.
  • 17.
    B. Milgram ShockExperiment Milgram advertised for participants to get paid for completing Yale study on memory. • 2 people showed up to psychology lab. One was true S & the other a confederate. • A stern experimenter in a lab coat, explained that study was interested in the effect of punishment on learning.
  • 18.
    Milgram Study • TheS was to play the role of “teacher,” the confederate, the role of “learner.” • “Teacher” was to read word pairs to the “learner” who was in another room hooked up to shock leads. • With each missed word, the S was to shock the “learner.”
  • 20.
    Milgram study • Theshock panel had switches ranging from 15 to 450 volts in 15-volt increments. • Switches were labeled: “slight shock,” “very strong shock,” “danger: severe shock,” etc. How many Ss went on shocking the “learner” all the way?
  • 21.
    Milgram’s Results: • 65-66%of Ss continued shocking “learner” to full capacity.
  • 22.
    What factors influenceobedience? • 1. Emotional distance of victim • 2. Closeness & legitimacy of the authority • 3. Institutional authority • 4. Liberating effects of group influence
  • 23.
    When do peopleconform? • 1. Group size- 3-5 people will elicit more conformity than 1 or 2 people. • Beyond 5 people- conformity drops off.
  • 24.
    Milgram’s field study(1969): • Required 1,2,3,5,10, or 15 people to “pause” on a busy New York City sidewalk & look up. • % of people passing by who also looked up increased as the number of people looking up increased (from 1 to 5).
  • 25.
    2. Unanimity • Anindividual who disagrees with a group, & punctures the group’s unanimity deflates its social power. • Ss will voice their own views if just 1 person has done so.
  • 26.
    3. Cohesion • Thegreater the cohesiveness of the group, the more power it has over its members. • We are more easily swayed by a minority opinion from inside our group than from another group. • E.g., we often feel compelled to “act-like” those within our ethnic group to avoid being mocked by members of our group (Contrada & others, 2000).
  • 27.
    4. Status • Higher-statuspeople tend to have more influence over others.
  • 28.
    5. Public response: •People conform more when they must respond publicly in front of others.
  • 29.
    Why do weconform? • We conform to avoid rejection & to stay in others’ good graces. • Normative influence- “When in Rome, do as the Romans would do.”
  • 30.
    Who conforms? • Aresome people more likely to conform than others? • Who is more susceptible to conformity?
  • 31.
    1. Personality-predisposes usto either be conforming or non-conforming. 2. Culture- Conformity is higher in countries high in collectivism & lower in countries high in individualism.
  • 32.
    Resisting Social Pressure •1. Reactance- people rebel when their sense of freedom is threatened. • 2. Asserting Uniqueness- being different to make a statement about oneself.