This document discusses the concept of deeply engaging in one's work. It defines engaging deeply as going beyond a "chalta hai" or lackadaisical attitude to caring deeply about one's work. It provides examples of the mindsets of contributors versus non-contributors. Contributors commit fully to projects, seek high quality work, and enjoy their work, while non-contributors give up easily and focus only on completing tasks with low quality. Case studies are presented of individuals who overcame disabilities through strong determination and dedication to their goals, exemplifying deeply engaged attitudes. Deeply engaged employees are shown to have lower turnover, better performance, and increase their organizations' success.

1. ENGAGING DEEPLY PREPARED BY :
NEN PATEL
AARYA CHAVDA
AMIT KUMAR YADAV
VYAS SHIV AMIT

2. NEED OF ENGAGING DEEPLY
Need for engaging deeply:- It is easier to
“give up”. The deeper I go into the subject,
the clearer I become. I am able to find new
answers, discover new ways of doing
things, and transform myself in the
process. “Engaging deeply” means giving
up the 'chalta hai' attitude and caring
deeply about your work.
2

3. ▪ To study how people (contributors)
“engage deeply” in their work, and how
they demonstrated “engaging deeply”
practices
“Engaging deeply” means giving up the
'chalta hai' attitude and caring deeply
about your work.
3

4. CONCEPT OF DEEPLY
ENGAGE
▪ In the following term,we are going to discuss
about Contributor’s as well as non-
contributor’s Mindset and approach to their
work. In this topic, we are going to know
following terms-How they involved to their
work? How much they are commited to
their work? What attitude they possess
for their work?
4

5. CONTRIBUTOR AND NON-
CONTRIBUTOR ATTITUDE
 Contributors take up
an idea and work
deeply with that idea to
make it a reality in
their lives
 Contributors commit
themselves to the
success of a project
▪ Non-contributors give
up easily when they
have to go deeper into
the subject
▪ Non-contributors do
not commit themselves
to the success of a
project
5

6.  Non-contributors often focus
on “completing the task” even
if the quality of work is poor.
They have a “chalta hai”
attitude Contributors seek to
create “high quality” products.
They care about what they
have produced.
 Focus on “completing The
“Task”.
 Quality of work low
 “CHALTA HAI” attitude.
▪ Contributors are
instantly distinguished
by the way they
approach work . They
get involved. They are
enthusiastic. They go
deep into the subject.
In short, Contributors
love what they do.
Contributors Attitude.
▪ Create high quality
product
▪ Care deeply about their
work.

7. Different approaches of
contributor and non
contributor :-
Akshay and Vinayak are two students
studying artificial intelligence in the 7th
semester of their computer engineering.
Here Vinayak has a non contributor type
thinking and Akshay has a contributor
thinking and to justify this lets
understand what they think.

8. CONTRIBUTOR APPROACH
Contributor:
Akshay thinks that although the subject is difficult to
understand, the deeper I indulge myself in this subject
and understand the concepts, the more I know and the
better I get at this subject. This not only help me improve
grades but would also let me discover new things in this
vast and emerging field.

9. NON-CONTRIBUTOR
APPROACH
▪ Non-Contributor:-
▪ Vinayak thinks that he just needs to study that much
which is required to boost his grades and because the
subject is difficult to understand, then why struggle
understanding it and move forward without
understanding the subject and just studying the
subject with sole purpose of grades.

10. Example 2:-
Nokia was a popular brand in mobile phones
back in 2007-2012 and was almost with every
single person. But after 2012 they witnessed a
big fall in their sales and the market they built.
Meanwhile the companies like Apple, Samsung,
One Plus, etc. kept on improving their
standards and quality. Then how did Nokia
failed like this? Let’s see

11. CONTRIBUTOR APPROACH
▪ Nokia had a non contributor type thinking because
the firm thought that it would be foolish to update
themselves with time as they were doing good and
stick to Windows OS with limited services. This shows
that they were not ready to implement something
new and interesting, instead they would stick to their
comfort zone. They didn’t even think of implementing
other OS in their phones.

12. NON-CONTRIBUTOR
APPROACH
▪ Nokia had a non contributor type thinking because
the firm thought that it would be foolish to update
themselves with time as they were doing good and
stick to Windows OS with limited services. This shows
that they were not ready to implement something
new and interesting, instead they would stick to their
comfort zone. They didn’t even think of implementing
other OS in their phones.

13. Example 3:-
▪ Waghmare Builders and Savy Builders were two very
reputed construction groups out their. Waghmare group
makes a 5-Floor residential building in Ghatlodiya area of
Ahmedabad and Savy group also make 5-Floor residential
building in Ghatlodiya. Waghmare group, for cost-cutting
and expectations of earning higher rates compromised the
overall architecture and quality of the building. Meanwhile,
Savy group made the building with proper material and with
very high passion they completed the project. Lets see who
among them is a contributor and Non-contributor

14. NON-CONTRIBUTOR
APPROACH
▪ Waghmare Builders were clearly adapting a non
contributor mind-set as they were building for the
sake of building and if something goes the other way
then their attitude would be “CHALTA HAI!”. So their
workers attitude was building the complex fast and
then go home. So if the building is made of poor
quality then in the situation of earthquake, that would
be worrisome as people living their might end up
getting injured or passing away- .

15. CASE STORY-1
▪ Shekar Naik- Naik is a perfect example of someone
who has converted a disability into an opportunity.
With his strong will power and dedication, he became
a T20 Blind Cricket World Champion and has 32
centuries to his name. After a lot of financial and
social troubles, Naik has emerged as a winner and we
salute his spirit

16. CASE STORY-2
▪ Prabhu’s life changed at the age of four when a
botched lumbar puncture made him a quadriplegic for
the rest of his life. But he never let this disability
change his goals of life and continued his education in
a regular school. His immense hard work and
dedication has made him a notable figure and a
leading quadriplegic wheelchair tennis player. He
was a medal winner at the 1998 World Championships
and was also awarded the Padma Shri by Government
of India in 2014. It seems like disability is not a word in
his dictionary.

17. CASE STORY-3
▪ Vishwanathan lost sensation in the lower half of his
body when he was a kid. But he was not one to let a
disability take over his life. He became India’s first
skydiver and has his name registered in the Limca
Book of Records for being the first Indian with
disability to skydive from 14,000 feet. He has co-
founded Sahasra, an organization that provides
scholarships to financially disadvantaged students
with great potential, to pursue higher studies. He
currently works as a risk consultant at Deloitte U.S. in
India

18. CASE STORY-3
▪ Arunima Sinha lost her leg when some robbers
pushed her out of a moving train. Two years later,
she became the first woman amputee to climb Mount
Everest. She disliked the look of pity and sympathy in
everyone’s eyes and did not want to be looked upon
as a handicapped person She has proved that a
strong determination and will is far more important
than a strong body with a prosthetic leg, she
overcame her challenges and made history.

19. CASE STORY-4
▪ Rajinder Singh Rahelu contracted polio when he was eight
months old. Since then, he has not been able to walk. But he
did not let his disability come in between him and his
dreams. Rahelu decided to discontinue his studies after
completing high school. In 1996, a little encouragement from
his powerlifter friend motivated Rahelu to pursue a career
in this sport. He started by lifting a weight of 75 kgs but
rigorous training and motivation made him strong enough
to lift a weight of 115 kgs within six months. He continued to
practice, and today, he has created history after winning a
silver medal in powerlifting at the Commonwealth Games
2014.

20. CASE STORY-5
▪ Preethi Srinivasan was the captain of the under-19
Tamil Nadu women’s cricket team. Even after the
unfortunate swimming accident that left her
paralyzed below the neck, she continues to inspire
other lives through her organization Soulfree. She
has started to provide hope to women with severe
disabilities and assists them in fulfilling their highest
human potential by providing a basic quality of life.

21. CONSEQUENCES OF DEEPLY
ENGAGED
Consequences of Deeply engagement -In this relation,
higher work engagement levels decreases turnover
intention, improves job performance, productivity and
commitment, and increases organization's profits and
revenues When employees are engaged at work,
academic research shows, they tend to stay longer on
the job and are more productive, self-motivated and
happier coming to the office. Engaged employees are also
more likely to see their job as a calling and derive deeper
meaning from the day - to - day work
21

22. THANK YOU
22