The document discusses contributors versus non-contributors and provides examples of each. It describes how contributors fully commit themselves to projects, are deeply interested in their work, and strive for high quality. In contrast, non-contributors only do the bare minimum and are not concerned about the quality of their work. It then provides two case stories as examples of emotional engagement and personal commitment: the story of Dashrath Manjhi who single-handedly carved a path through mountains over 22 years, and the story of the Brooklyn Bridge being built despite the injuries of its chief engineer, Washington Roebling, who used a tapping code to direct construction.

1. ENGAGE DEEPLY
CPDP – V SEM
Winter 2021

2. Non- Contributor’s Attitude
• •Only Do what they Love (COMFORT
ZONE)
• •They easily give up on the topic
which needs core understanding.
• •They simply follow a procedure
devised by the supervisor.

3. Contributor’s Attitude
• •They Love what has to be done.
• •Go deeper in the Subject than just
following general procedure.
• •They realize that life and workspace
have a variety of tasks and hence keeping
aside their tasks of interest, they work
for betterment of society.

4. Personal commitment
• Strongly stand with the taken decision

5. Non- contributors
• • Do not commit themselves to
the success of a project.
• • Thinks why should I give up my
comforts and pleasures and show
interest in the project.

6. Contributors
•Commit themselves to the
success of the project.
•Gets completely involved in
the project for its success.

7. I. .I. .I.
• Initiative. Interest. Intellect
• Interest can be defined as willingness or drive of
a person in doing something.
• Initiative is a persons ability to propel himself for
doing something.
• Intellect is a term used in studies of the human
mind, and refers to the ability of the mind to
come to correct conclusions about what is true or
real, and about how to solve problems.

8. Non Contributors Contributors
• • Focus on Create high quality
COMPLETING THE products. TASK
• • Care deeply about• Quality of
work low. their work.• “ CHALTA
HAI “ Attitude.

9. EMOTIONAL DISENGAGEMENT
•
• • Emotional disengagement: A person who is
not concerned about the work assigned or the
situation faced can be called as emotionally
disengaged person.
• • One who is emotionally disengaged is a non-
contributor and thinks that his work is boring
and hates to struggle for a solution.

10. EXAMPLES
• Emotionally engaged (contributor)
• Emotionally disengaged (non-contributor)

11. Case story 1
Big example of
Emotional engagement
&
Personal commitment

12. Case story 1

13. POSTAL STAMP

14. Dushrath Manjhi Road

15. Dashrath Manjhi
• 14 January 1929 – 17 August 2007
• Also known as Mountain Man
• Was a labor in Gehlaur village,
near Gaya in Bihar, India
• When his wife died in 1959 due to injury
caused by falling from a mountain
• he decided to carve a path of 110 m long,
9.1 m wide and 7.7 m deep through a ridge of
hills using only a hammer and chisel

16. hammer and chisel

17. • After 22 years of work, Dashrath shortened
travel between the Atri and
Wazirganj blocks of Gaya town from 55 km to
15 km
• He travelled to New Delhi to get recognition of
his work and was rewarded by then Chief
Minister of Bihar, Nitish Kumar
• In 2016, Indian Post issued a postage
stamp featuring him.

18. Dushrath Manjhi Road

19. Case story 2
Second big example of
Emotional engagement
&
Personal commitment

20. Case story 2 – Brooklyn Bridge, New
York, US

21. • In 1883, an engineer named John
Roebling was inspired by an idea to build
a spectacular bridge connecting New
York with Long Island.
• Bridge building experts throughout the
world thought that this was an
Impossible feat and told Roebling to
forget it as it had never been done
Before. Roebling knew that it could be
done.

22. • He shared the dream with His son
Washington, an upcoming engineer.
• Working together, the father And son.
• Developed concept of how the dream could
be accomplished.
• With great inspiration and excitement about
the challenge before them, they hired their
crew to build the dream bridge.
• Few months into the project there was an on-
site accident. John Roebling died in it.
• Washington was injured and was left with
brain damage, and could not talk or move.

23. • Everyone thought the project would be
scrapped since the father (Roebling) were the
only ones who knew how the bridge could be
built. Despite his handicap, Washington still
had a burning desire to complete the bridge.
• He tried to inspire and pass on his enthusiasm
to some of his friends, but they were too
afraid to take up the task.
• As he lay on his bed in his hospital room, with
the sunlight streaming through, an idea hit
him.

24. • All he could do was move one finger and he
decided to make the best use of it.
• By moving this finger, he slowly developed a code
of communication by tapping his finger, with his
wife through which he communicated to his
engineers.
• He also encouraged his wife to study higher
mathematics, strengths of different materials,
etc. It seemed foolish, but the project was under
way again.
• For 13 years Washington tapped out his
instructions using his finger until the bridge was
finally completed.
• Today the spectacular Brooklyn Bridge stands in
all its glory

25. THANK YOU